A multicenter investigation with D-FISH BCR/ABL1 probes

Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Probe Validation for Clinical Use

In this chapter, we provide a systematic overview of the published guidelines and validation procedures for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes for clinical diagnostic use. FISH probes-which are classified as molecular probes or analyte-specific reagents (ASRs)-have been extensively used in vitro for both clinical diagnosis and research. Most commercially available FISH probes in the United States are strictly regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA), and the College of American Pathologists (CAP). Although home-brewed FISH probes-defined as probes made in-house or acquired from a source that does not supply them to other laboratories-are not regulated by these agencies, they too must undergo the same individual validation process prior to clinical use as their commercial counterparts. Validation of a FISH probe involves initial validation and ongoing verification of the test system. Initial validation includes assessment of a probe's technical specifications, establishment of its standard operational procedure (SOP), determination of its clinical sensitivity and specificity, development of its cutoff, baseline, and normal reference ranges, gathering of analytics, confirmation of its applicability to a specific research or clinical setting, testing of samples with or without the abnormalities that the probe is meant to detect, staff training, and report building. Ongoing verification of the test system involves testing additional normal and abnormal samples using the same method employed during the initial validation of the probe.

Comprehensive Molecular Analyses in a Case of Masked Philadelphia Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Here, we report the case of an 80-year-old woman with masked Philadelphia chronic myeloid leukemia (Ph CML). At diagnosis, qualitative PCR demonstrated the presence of a typical e14a2 configuration, and chromosome analysis showed an apparently normal female karyotype. However, FISH with BCR-ABL1 dual fusion probes gave a positive signal in 152/200 analyzed nuclei, with the fusion signal detected on the long arm of a cytogenetically normal chromosome 9. Using locus-specific probes for chromosome 9 and 22 telomeres, a third chromosome involvement was excluded. Furthermore, microarray analysis from the same specimens showed a normal result. Due to a high Charlson Comorbidity Index, the patient was treated with a reduced dose of imatinib, achieving a rapid hematological response after 1 month. However, after 6 months of imatinib therapy, she had to be considered as warning (Ph+ 26.5%, BCR-ABL1 >1%) according to the European LeukemiaNet 2013 recommendations. In conclusion, we confirmed the importance of a combination of cytogenetic and molecular techniques for the diagnosis and therapy monitoring of masked Ph CML, but, different from what has been reported in the literature so far, we cannot completely exclude the fact that the unusual cytogenetic pattern of this patient may have negatively influenced her response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.

Cytogenetic and molecular characteristics of 25 Chilean patients with a variant Ph translocation

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is characterized by the presence of the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph), which results from a balanced translocation between chromosomes 9 and 22, the t(9;22)(q34;q11.2). In 5-10% of the cases, variants of the Ph (vPh) are detected, involving various breakpoints in addition to 9q34 and 22q11.2. Deletions on the der(9) and der(22) can be detected in approximately 10-15% of CML patients. The frequency of a deletion of the der(9) in vPh CML is variable. Most studies have shown high frequencies (30-45%) in this subgroup. We report the cytogenetic evaluation of 25 vPh cases, which represents 6.8% of the CML cases diagnosed at one institution in 20 years. The breakpoints of the partners of the vPh in our patients agree with those reported previously, except for a novel 18q23. We found a low incidence of deletions of the der(9) (10%) and der(22) (5%) in these patients, contrasting with several reports in the literature. This finding may reflect the extensive spectrum of aberrations in vPh, and the possibility that a considerable group of these aberrations may not affect the genetic stability of 5'ABL1 and 3'BCR. Epidemiologic differences may also exist and could explain our results. These differences would require further investigation.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization methods and troubleshooting applied to fixed cell suspensions

A robust procedure for performing fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is described, with tips for troubleshooting. FISH probes are now more reliable and there is a greater range commercially available. FISH is an essential part of the cytogeneticist's repertoire. It remains a powerful, complementary adjunct to karyotype studies, and knowledge of the underlying chromosome abnormalities can be essential for understanding the FISH signal patterns.

Standardization of fluorescence in situ hybridization studies on chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) blood and marrow cells by the CLL Research Consortium

Five laboratories in the Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Research Consortium (CRC) investigated standardizing and pooling of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results as a collaborative research project. This investigation used fixed bone marrow and blood cells available from previous conventional cytogenetic or FISH studies in two pilot studies, a one-day workshop, and proficiency test. Multiple FISH probe strategies were used to detect 6q-, 11q-, +12, 13q-, 17p-, and IGH rearrangements. Ten specimens were studied by participants who used their own probes (pilot study 1). Of 312 FISH interpretations, 224 (72%) were true-negative, 74 (24%) true-positive, 6 (2%) false-negative, and 8 (3%) false-positive. In pilot study no. 2, each participant studied two specimens using identical FISH probe sets to control for variation due to probe sets and probe strategies. Of 80 FISH interpretations, no false interpretations were identified. At a subsequent workshop, discussions produced agreement on scoring criteria. The proficiency test that followed produced no false-negative results and 4% (3/68) false-positive interpretations. Interpretation disagreements among laboratories were primarily attributable to inadequate normal cutoffs, inconsistent scoring criteria, and the use of different FISH probe strategies. Collaborative organizations that use pooled FISH results may wish to impose more conservative empiric normal cutoff values or use an equivocal range between the normal cutoff and the abnormal reference range to eliminate false-positive interpretations. False-negative results will still occur, and would be expected in low-percentage positive cases; these would likely have less clinical significance than false positive results. Individual laboratories can help by closely following rigorous quality assurance guidelines to ensure accurate and consistent FISH studies in their clinical practice and research.

Statistical treatment of fluorescence in situ hybridization validation data to generate normal reference ranges using Excel functions

Fluorescent in situ hybridization has become an essential tool for diagnosing and monitoring hematological disease. Testing for minimal residual disease requires precise and accurate normal cut-offs. There is no consensus in the field on the correct method of establishing a normal reference range. We discuss and compare several proposed statistical methods to calculate normal reference ranges, including Gaussian statistics, the beta inverse function, and a binomial treatment of the data. We demonstrate that a binomial treatment of the data is an accurate and simple method to calculate a normal reference range.

Guidance for fluorescence in situ hybridization testing in hematologic disorders

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) provides an important adjunct to conventional cytogenetics and molecular studies in the evaluation of chromosome abnormalities associated with hematologic malignancies. FISH employs DNA probes and methods that are generally not Food and Drug Administration-approved, and therefore, their use as analyte-specific reagents involves unique pre- and postanalytical requirements. We provide an overview of the technical parameters influencing a reliable FISH result and encourage laboratories to adopt specific procedures and policies in implementing metaphase and interphase FISH testing. A rigorous technologist training program relative to specific types of probes is detailed, as well as guidance for consistent interpretation of findings, including typical and atypical abnormal results. Details are provided on commonly used dual-fusion, extra signal, and break-apart probes, correct FISH nomenclature in the reporting of results, and the use of FISH in relation to other laboratory testing in the ongoing monitoring of disease. This article provides laboratory directors detailed guidance to be used in conjunction with existing regulations to successfully implement a FISH testing program or to assess current practices, allowing for optimal clinical testing for patient care.

Automated Duet spot counting system and manual technologist scoring using dual-fusion fluorescence in situ hybridization (D-FISH) strategy: comparison and application to FISH minimal residual disease testing in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia

The automated BioView Duet system was compared with manual technologist scoring (MTS) using a BCR/ABL dual-fusion FISH (D-FISH) probe strategy for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) specimens. In the first study, 500 nuclei were evaluated for 10 distinct signal patterns in various abnormal cell percentages from each of 89 specimens. The Duet system correctly identified all 27 normal specimens and the abnormal signal pattern of all 63 abnormal specimens. The percentage of abnormal nuclei detected was also concordant, with an average difference between MTS and the Duet system of only 2.7%. However, achievement of accurate quantitative results required reclassification by a technologist for nearly 50% of nuclei per specimen. Next, the Duet system was used to evaluate BCR/ABL D-FISH for FISH minimal residual disease (MRD) detection in CML patients. Up to 6,000 nuclei were evaluated for four signal pattern categories for each of 60 CML MRD samples. Excluding four abnormal specimens with insufficient samples, the Duet system correctly identified all of the abnormal specimens and identified four additional abnormal specimens previously diagnosed as normal by MTS. The technologist time required for evaluation and reclassification of the Duet system data for the FISH MRD samples averaged only 1 minute per case, saving significant technologist effort. We conclude that the Duet system appears to be more sensitive and cost-effective than MTS for CML FISH MRD testing.

FISH analysis for the detection of lymphoma-associated chromosomal abnormalities in routine paraffin-embedded tissue

Over the last decade, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has become a firmly established technique in the diagnosis and assessment of lymphoid malignancies. However, this technique is not wide-ly used in the routine diagnostic evaluation of paraffin-embedded biopsies, most likely because of a perception that it is technically more demanding. There are also uncertainties regarding diagnostic thresholds and the way in which results should be interpreted. In this Review, we describe practical strategies for using FISH analysis to detect lymphoma-associated chromosomal abnormalities in routine paraffin-embedded lymphoma biopsies. Furthermore, we provide proposals on how FISH results should be interpreted (including how to calculate cutoff levels for FISH probes), recorded, and reported. An online appendix (available at http://jmd.amjpathol.org) details various simple, yet robust procedures for paraffin FISH analysis; it also provides additional information on the production of FISH probes, evaluating and reporting FISH results, sources for reagents and equipment, and troubleshooting. We hope that these suggestions will make FISH technology for the study of lymphoma biopsies more accessible to routine diagnostic and research laboratories.

Preclinical validation of fluorescence in situ hybridization assays for clinical practice

PURPOSE

Validation of fluorescence in situ hybridization assays is required before using them in clinical practice. Yet, there are few published examples that describe the validation process, leading to inconsistent and sometimes inadequate validation practices. The purpose of this article is to describe a broadly applicable preclinical validation process.

METHODS

Validation is performed using four consecutive experiments. The Familiarization experiment tests probe performance on metaphase cells to measure analytic sensitivity and specificity for normal blood specimens. The Pilot Study tests a variety of normal and abnormal specimens, using the intended tissue type, to set a preliminary normal cutoff and establish the analytic sensitivity. The Clinical Evaluation experiment tests these parameters in a series of normal and abnormal specimens to simulate clinical practice, establish the normal cutoff and abnormal reference ranges, and finalize the standard operating procedure. The Precision experiment measures the reproducibility of the new assay over 10 consecutive working days. To illustrate documentation and analysis of data with this process, the results for a new assay to detect fusion of IGH and BCL3 associated with t(14;19)(q32;q13.3) in lymphoproliferative disorders are provided in this report.

RESULTS

These four experiments determine the analytic sensitivity and specificity, normal values, precision, and reportable reference ranges for validation of the new test.

CONCLUSION

This report describes a method for preclinical validation of fluorescence in situ hybridization studies of metaphase cells and interphase nuclei using commercial or home brew probes.

Automated fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of t(9;22)(q34;q11) in interphase nuclei

BACKGROUND

For chronic myeloid leukemia, the FISH detection of t(9;22)(q34;q11) in interphase nuclei of peripheral leukocytes is an alternative method to bone marrow karyotyping for monitoring treatment. With automation, several drawbacks of manual analysis may be circumvented. In this article, the capabilities of a commercially available automated image acquisition and analysis system were determined by detecting t(9;22)(q34;q11) in interphase nuclei of peripheral leukocytes.

METHODS

Three peripheral blood samples of normal adults, 21 samples of CML patients, and one sample of a t(9;22)(q34;q11) positive cell-line were used.

RESULTS

Single nuclei with correctly detected signals amounted to 99.6% of nuclei analyzed after exclusion of overlapping nuclei and nuclei with incorrect signal detection. A cut-off value of 0.84 mum was defined to discriminate between translocation positive and negative nuclei based on the shortest distance between signals. Using this value, the false positive rate of the automated analysis for negative samples was 7.0%, whereas that of the manual analysis was 5.8%. Automated and manual results showed strong correlation (R(2) = 0.985), the mean difference of results was only 3.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

A reliable and objective automated analysis of large numbers of cells is possible, avoiding interobserver variability and producing statistically more accurate results than manual evaluation.

Masked Philadelphia chromosome due to atypical BCR/ABL localization on the 9q34 band and duplication of the der(9) in a case of chronic myelogenous leukemia

The cytogenetic studies and molecular evaluation of a Philadelphia chromosome negative chronic myelogenous leukemia patient with trisomy 21 (100% metaphases) and trisomy 9 (50% metaphases) at diagnosis are described. Fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed an atypical location of the BCR/ABL fusion signal on 9q, which was duplicated in cells with trisomy 9 simulating a double Ph. The patient was successfully treated with Glivec (also known as Gleevec; Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) and achieved complete hematological and cytogenetic response as well as a reduction of BCR/ABL transcripts detected by real-time quantitative PCR.

Molecular surveillance of chronic myeloid leukemia patients in the imatinib era - evaluation of response and resistance

Residual disease in chronic myeloid leukemia patients may be assessed by various molecular methods. After imatinib treatment a significant proportion of patients achieve complete cytogenetic remission (CCR) and a sensitive method is necessary to monitor treatment response and to detect early signs of relapse. Reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is by far the most sensitive approach to assess residual disease in this group of patients. Qualitative PCR methods give only limited information about the residual leukemic mass. Quantitative RT-PCR (Q-PCR) assays enable to monitor the kinetics of residual BCR-ABL transcripts over time in patients with a good response to imatinib. Early Q-PCR results on imatinib treatment can help to identify individuals who are likely to have a good response. In chronic phase patients after CCR, Q-PCR may identify patients who are likely to continue with their CCR or to relapse and may help to optimize treatment for this group of patients. The definition of molecular surrogate endpoints beyond CCR for studies which are currently planned demands standardization of the nomenclature and of technologies to measure these targets.

A novel tricolor, dual-fusion fluorescence in situ hybridization method to detect BCR/ABL fusion in cells with t(9;22)(q34;q11.2) associated with deletion of DNA on the derivative chromosome 9 in chronic myelocytic leukemia

Dual-color, dual-fusion fluorescence in situ hybridization (D-FISH) can accurately detect and quantify cells with BCR/ABL fusion in <1% of 500 nuclei in 80% of patients with chronic myelocytic leukemia (CML) and t(9;22)(q34;q11.2). The remaining patients have one of three forms of atypical D-FISH patterns; these patterns have different sensitivities to detect disease. Neoplastic cells with one ABL, one BCR, and one BCR/ABL fusion are particularly problematic, because normal cells with coincidental overlap have the same pattern. For these patients, the normal cutoff for D-FISH is >23%. We tested a new method that incorporates an aqua-labeled probe for the argininosuccinate synthetase (ASS) gene into the conventional BCR/ABL D-FISH probe set. This tricolor D-FISH (TD-FISH) method takes advantage of the aqua-labeled ASS probe to distinguish between neoplastic and normal cells. We used TD-FISH to study 20 normal specimens and 35 specimens from 20 patients with known loss of both BCR and ABL from the derivative chromosome 9. The results show that TD-FISH effectively discriminates between cells with overlapping BCR and ABL signals from cells with true BCR/ABL fusion and improves the ability to quantify minimal residual disease from >23% to >1% of 500 interphase nuclei.

Cytogenetics of chronic myeloproliferative disorders and related myelodysplastic syndromes

The only MPD associated with any specific chromosome anomaly is CML, which is linked with t(9;22)(q34;q11.2) or a variant of this anomaly. An association exists for del(13)(q12q14) and CIMF; t(5;12)(q33;p13) and CEL; and del(20q11), +8, and +9 and PV, but these anomalies can be seen in various hematologic malignancies. The most common chromosomal anomalies among MPD in order of frequency are t(9;22)(q34;q11.2), -Y, +8, +9, -7, del(20) (q11q13), del(13)(q12q14), del(5)(q13q33), and del(12)(p12). FISH techniques are useful for MPD to study inadequate bone marrow or blood specimens and to monitor disease status among patients with known chromosome anomalies, but they are not more sensitive than conventional chromosome studies.

Derivative chromosome 9 deletions in chronic myeloid leukaemia: interpretation of atypical D-FISH pattern

BACKGROUND/AIMS

New molecular cytogenetic techniques are increasingly applied as a routine investigative tool in haematological malignancies, both at diagnosis and subsequent monitoring. This report describes the interpretation of atypical signal patterns encountered using BCR-ABL dual colour dual fusion fluorescence in situ hybridisation (D-FISH) translocation probes in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML).

METHODS

Interphase FISH experiments were carried out using BCR-ABL D-FISH probes in 46 patients with CML at diagnosis and during subsequent disease monitoring. Atypical hybridisation signal patterns were characterised by molecular cytogenetic techniques and correlated with conventional karyotyping.

RESULTS

Two patients showed atypical interphase D-FISH patterns with one orange, one green, and one fusion (1O1G1F) signal. The presence of BCR-ABL gene fusion was documented by a dual colour single fusion (S-FISH) probe. The submicroscopic deletion of the ABL-BCR fusion gene on the derivative chromosome 9 in these cases was subsequently characterised by metaphase FISH on relocated G banded metaphases.

CONCLUSIONS

Atypical interphase D-FISH patterns should not be interpreted in isolation and should be considered in conjunction with other cytogenetic or molecular genetic investigations.

Proficiency testing for laboratories performing fluorescence in situ hybridization with chromosome-specific DNA probes

OBJECTIVE

To assess laboratory performance, use, and limitations in the joint College of American Pathologists and American College of Medical Genetics proficiency testing program for laboratories performing cytogenetic tests based on fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

DATA SOURCES

Eight proficiency surveys dealing with FISH detection of microdeletions or microduplications, aneuploidy in interphase cells, gene amplification, and neoplasm-specific translocations. Participating laboratories used their own DNA probes (commercial or home-brew), hybridization methods, and analytic criteria to answer clinical questions about cases represented by slides included in the survey materials. They also described their test results according to the International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (ISCN) and answered supplementary questions relating to their experience with the subject test systems.

DATA EXTRACTION

In addition to evaluating diagnostic accuracy, we evaluated survey use, laboratory experience, variation in methodologic approach, and the practicality of using ISCN nomenclature for describing test results.

SYNTHESIS AND CONCLUSIONS

With the exception of one challenge, at least 80% of the participants reached the correct diagnostic conclusion. In the sole exception, there was still a consensus of 91.7% of participants with the same (albeit erroneous) diagnostic conclusion. The overall outstanding performance of participating laboratories clearly shows the reliability of current FISH methods. Despite the fact that a large number of laboratories reported little or no experience with the specific test systems, the overwhelming majority performed very well. This result shows that the program's strategy of targeting classes of abnormalities (vs a single abnormality associated with a specific disease) did not put at a disadvantage participants who did not routinely perform all of the potential tests in the class. The extraordinary variation in ISCN descriptions submitted by participants showed that the existing system for human cytogenetic nomenclature is not suitable for facile communication of FISH test results.

Minimal residual disease in chronic myeloid leukaemia patients

In many ways, chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) serves as a paradigm for the utility of molecular methods in the diagnosis of malignancy or for monitoring the response of the patient to therapy. The Philadelphia (Ph) translocation provides an elegant example of how cytogenetic findings provided the starting point for understanding the genetic mechanisms involved in leukaemogenesis. The degree of reduction in tumour load after therapy is an important prognostic factor for CML patients. Several approaches have been introduced that can specifically detect the Ph translocation or its products; these approaches include fluorescent in situ hybridization, Southern blotting, western blotting and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Because non-quantitative RT-PCR analysis after therapy gives only limited information, quantitative or semiquantitative RT-PCR assays have been developed that enable the kinetics of residual BCR-ABL transcripts to be monitored over time in patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation, interferon-alpha, or STI571 therapy.

Persistence of transcriptionally silent BCR-ABL rearrangements in chronic myeloid leukemia patients in sustained complete cytogenetic remission

Persistence of BCR-ABL rearrangements was demonstrated by D-FISH technique in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients in complete cytogenetic response (CCR) after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) or interferon-alpha therapy (IFN-alpha). Samples from bone marrow aspirate or peripheral blood or both were analyzed by conventional cytogenetics, Southern blot, fluorescent interphase in situ hybridization (FISH), and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (Q-RT-PCR). In all patients, FISH detected 1% to 12% nuclei with a BCR-ABL fusion gene, whereas Q-RT-PCR were negative or weakly positive. Based on these results, we hypothesize that the BCR-ABL genomic rearrangement remains unexpressed in a small percentage of cells whatever the treatment (IFN-alpha or BMT), and this in spite of the negativity of the RT-PCR-based classical molecular remission criterion. These data corroborate those obtained by other investigators and point to the need for follow-up of CML patients in CCR over an extensive period, at the DNA level to evaluate the residual disease and at the RNA level (Q-RT-PCR) to estimate the risk of relapse and guide the therapeutic decision. Experimental models suggesting the persistence of positive BCR-ABL cells are discussed and tentative explanations of tumor "dormancy" are proposed.

Cytogenetics of chronic myeloid leukaemia

The standard Philadelphia (Ph) translocation t(9;22), its variants and a proportion of Ph-negative cases are positive for the BCR-ABL fusion gene, as determined by molecular analysis. Extensive deletions of chromosome 9 and 22 derived sequences around the translocation breakpoints on the derivative 9 are seen in 10-30% of patients at diagnosis and may confer a worse prognosis. Additional cytogenetic changes can occur in the few months before or during disease progression and are often specific for blast morphology; however, the molecular basis of the most common additional cytogenetic abnormalities is largely unknown. Cytogenetics is important for monitoring patient response to treatment but is increasingly being replaced by the more sensitive and less invasive techniques of RT-PCR and FISH.