A comparison of multileaf collimator with conformal blocks for the boost phase of dose-escalated conformal prostate radiotherapy

Geometric leaf placement strategies

Geometric leaf placement strategies for multileaf collimators (MLCs) typically involve the expansion of the beam's-eye-view contour of a target by a uniform MLC margin, followed by movement of the leaves until some point on each leaf end touches the expanded contour. Film-based dose-distribution measurements have been made to determine appropriate MLC margins--characterized through an index d90--for multileaves set using one particular strategy to straight lines lying at various angles to the direction of leaf travel. Simple trigonometric relationships exist between different geometric leaf placement strategies and are used to generalize the results of the film work into d90 values for several different strategies. Measured d90 values vary both with angle and leaf placement strategy. A model has been derived that explains and describes quite well the observed variations of d90 with angle. The d90 angular variations of the strategies studied differ substantially, and geometric and dosimetric reasoning suggests that the best strategy is the one with the least angular variation. Using this criterion, the best straightforwardly implementable strategy studied is a 'touch circle' approach for which semicircles are imagined to be inscribed within leaf ends, the leaves being moved until the semicircles just touch the expanded target outline.

Elimination of importance factors for clinically accurate selection of beam orientations, beam weights and wedge angles in conformal radiation therapy

A method of simultaneously optimizing beam orientations, beam weights, and wedge angles for conformal radiotherapy is presented. This method removes the need for importance factors by optimizing one objective only, subject to a set of rigid constraints. This facilitates the production of inverse solutions which, without trial-and-error modification of importance factors, precisely satisfy the specified constraints. The algorithm minimizes an objective function which is based upon the single objective to be optimized, but which is forced to an artificially high value when the constraints are not met, so that only satisfactory solutions are allowed. Due to the complex nature of the objective function space, including multiple local minima separated by large regions of plateau, a random search technique equivalent to fast simulated annealing is used for producing inverse plans. To illustrate the novel features of the new algorithm, a simulation is first presented, for the case of a cylindrical phantom. The morphology of the objective function space is shown to be significantly different for the new algorithm, compared to that for a conventional quadratic objective function. Clinical cases for prostate and craniopharyngioma are then presented. For the prostate case, the objective is to reduce irradiated rectal volume. Three-field, four-field, and six-field optimizations, with or without orientation optimization, are shown to provide solutions which are consistent with previously reported plans and class solutions. For the craniopharyngioma case, which involves the use of a high-precision stereotactic conformal technique, the objective is to reduce the irradiated volume of normal brain. Practically feasible beam angles are produced which, compared to a standard plan, provide a small but worthwhile sparing of normal brain. The algorithm is thereby shown to be robust and suitable for clinical application.

Class solutions for conformal external beam prostate radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To determine a class solution coplanar plan from comparisons of three-field (3F), four-field (4F), and six-field (6F) plans in conformal non-intensity-modulated prostate radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Doses to two clinical target volumes, prostate only (PO) and prostate plus seminal vesicles (PSV) were evaluated in each of 10 patients using a variety of 3F, 4F, and 6F plans with a planning target volume margin of 10 mm. All plans were prescribed to 64 and 74 Gy. The class solution plan for each of 3F, 4F, and 6F was chosen from a variety of symmetrical and asymmetrical field arrangements that had been previously assessed. The class solution plans, 3F (0, 90, 270 degrees ), 4F (35, 90, 270, 325 degrees ), and 6F (50/lat/25) were compared with reference plans: 3F (0, 120, 240 degrees ), 4F (0, 90, 180, 270 degrees ), and 6F (55, 90, 125, 235, 270, 305 degrees ). Rectal volumes irradiated to greater than 50% (V(50)), 80% (V(80)), and 90% (V(90)) of the prescribed dose, normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) for rectum, bladder, and femoral heads (FH), and tumor control probabilities (TCP) were assessed. FH tolerance was set at 52 Gy to 10% volume.

RESULTS

The field arrangement that gave the lowest irradiated rectal volume with acceptable bladder and FH doses was a 3F (0, 90, 270 degrees ) class solution plan. This plan gave a reduction in rectal V(80) of 1.2-12.4% for the PO group and 2.3-23.8% for the PSV group compared with the other plans. The reduction in rectal V(90) was 0.2-11.9% for the PO group and 1.5-23.3% for the PSV group using the 3F (0, 90, 270 degrees ) plan. This plan provided one of the lowest rectal NTCPs, but the difference was not significant when compared with the 4F class solution plan. When target volumes with 10-mm margins remain unchanged to 74 Gy, the irradiated rectal volumes for all plans were higher and rectal NTCPs can be trebled.

CONCLUSION

The use of appropriate beam arrangements can provide a class solution plan using only 3 fields compared with 4 or 6 fields for the parameters considered. Both 3F (0, 90, 270 degrees ) and 4F (35, 90, 270, 325 degrees ) plans can be used as a class solution plan. Other practical issues that may influence the choice of class solution include delivery time with smaller number of fields, ease of verification, the use of 10-mm multileaf collimation vs. conformal blocks, and field shape fitting limitations when using dynamic wedges.

Commissioning and quality assurance of the Pinnacle(3) radiotherapy treatment planning system for external beam photons

The commissioning of a Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system is described. Four Elekta linear accelerators were commissioned for external beam photons. Measured data were used to derive parameter values for the Pinnacle(3) beam model by (1). fitting a Monte Carlo model of the accelerator head to measured data and then extracting the parameters for the Pinnacle(3) beam model, and by (2). using the auto-modelling facility within Pinnacle(3). Both of these methods yielded dose distributions in accord with published recommendations. A separate small-field beam model, customized for an in-house compact blocking system, was also created, which satisfied appropriate acceptance criteria for stereotactically guided conformal brain treatments. Inhomogeneous, oblique, asymmetrical and irregular fields were also assessed, with calculated and measured doses agreeing to within +/-3%. Dose-volume histogram calculation was found to be accurate to within +/-5% dose or volume for a grid size of 4 mm x 4 mm x 4 mm, with better accuracy being achieved for finer grids. Isocentric doses were compared between Pinnacle(3)'s collapsed cone convolution algorithm and the Bentley-Milan algorithm within the Target-2 treatment planning system. Dose differences were generally less than 3% in the dose prescribed, with larger values for breast plans, where the Pinnacle(3) algorithm calculated scatter more accurately. Pelvic and thoracic plans were also verified using an anthropomorphic phantom, with local dose differences between calculated and delivered dose of up to 8%, but mainly less than 3%, and with no systematic difference. Ionization chamber verifications using START and RT-01 trial procedures demonstrated differences between calculated and measured doses of less than 2%. Following satisfactory performance in the commissioning process, Pinnacle(3) has now been introduced into routine clinical use.

Role of multileaf collimator in replacing shielding blocks in radiation therapy

To facilitate the use of multileaf collimator (MLC) in field shaping, we tested the hypothesis that the changes in the penumbra due to MLC replacing a Cerrobend block can be related to a change in the margin of the block. We also investigated if it is possible to estimate the effect of MLC replacing a block in terms of a change in the block margin. Calculations were performed for a single field as well as a multiple field setup. For the single field setup, blocks with equal areas were drawn at the four corners of a 16 x 20 cm(2) field at angles of 20 degrees, 40 degrees, 60 degrees, and 80 degrees with the horizontal axis. The blocks were then replaced with MLC leaves. For 6 MV x-rays, dose profiles in the penumbra regions of the blocks at 5- and 10-cm depths were compared with those obtained with the corresponding MLC setup. For multiple fields, the same sets of blocks were set up on the anterio-posterior (AP-PA) pair of a four-field setup. The margins of the blocks were increased (i.e., block shaved) in 1 mm steps to a maximum of 6 mm. The similarity between MLC and the change in the block margin was examined by comparing the dose-volume histogram (DVH) of the normal tissues in the penumbral regions for the different setups. To correlate the effect of MLC with a change in the block margin, difference dose-volume histograms (DDVH) of the normal tissues relative to the original block were compared for the MLC setup with those for the changes in the block margin. The correlation obtained was used to predict the effect on the penumbra region of the MLC setup for the lateral fields of a patient irradiated with a four-field setup. The calculations were carried out with 15 MV x-rays. For the single field setup, dose undulation is largest for the 50% isodose line (IDL) as reflected in the largest increase in the 50% to 20% isodose region compared with the 90% to 10% and the 80% to 20% regions. The increase in the penumbral width is largest for the 20 degrees block when replaced by the MLC and is smaller as the angle increases. The increase in the penumbral width also increases with depth. The effect of replacing a Cerrobend block with an MLC is similar to an increase in the block margin. For 15 MV x-rays, the increase varies inversely with the angle of the blocks, from > 6 mm increase in block margin for the 20 degrees block to about 1 mm for the 80 degrees block. In the clinical example, replacing the blocks in the lateral fields of a four-field irradiation with MLC is similar to changing the margin of the blocks. For the posterior block, MLC is similar to a 1- to 2-mm increase in the margin of the block, whereas for the anterior block the effect is similar to 1 mm for the straight portion of the block to about 6 mm in the superior portion of the block. Characterization of an MLC setup replacing a Cerrobend block is necessary for adequate coverage of target volume. The effect of MLC replacing a Cerrobend block is similar to a change in the block margin. It is possible to estimate with reasonable accuracy the effect of MLC replacing a Cerrobend block.