145 Prostate volume reduction induced by neoadjuvant androgen ablation in preparation for permanent radioactive seed implantation

New sparse implantation technique of I-125 low-dose-rate brachytherapy using concomitant short-term hormonal treatment for low and intermediate-risk prostate cancer: An initial study of therapeutic feasibility

This study aimed to evaluate the oncological outcomes and post-implantation complications of the concurrent androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with I-125 low-dose-rate (LDR)-prostate brachytherapy (sparse implantation technique: SIT) in comparison with the conventional non-ADT using whole gland brachytherapy (CWT). 302 localized prostate cancer (PCa) patients were treated with CWT (implantation dose: 145 Gy) and 215 patients were treated with SIT, which applied reduced implantation dose of 123.5 Gy. SIT group had ADT consisting of bicalutamide 50 mg/day plus 3-month depot (11.25 mg) of leuprolide acetate subcutaneously on the post-implantation day-0. Post-implantation complications and biochemical-recurrence-free-survival (BCRS) were compared between the two groups. After ADT, SIT group had 40.9% patients (40.9%) with prostate volume reduction between 20–30%. At 3-months post-implantation, SIT group presented significantly better IPSS than CWT group (p = 0.038). Both groups showed decrease in IIEF-5 score at 3-months post-implantation, but ST group showed significantly better mean IIEF-5 scores (13.5) than the CWT group (11.1) (p = 0.045). For 3-months post-implantation dosimetry, both groups showed no significant differences regarding D90 (CWT 156 Gy vs. SIT 152 Gy). CWT group had 3 patients with rectal toxicity ≥radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) grade 2 and 1 patient with urinary toxicity ≥RTOG grade 2 whereas SIT group had no patient with urinary or rectal toxicity ≥RTOG grade 2. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed no significant differences regarding PCSS were observed between the two groups (p = 0.350). The SIT group showed compatible oncological outcomes to the CWT and relatively smaller number of post-implantation complications within low- and intermediate-risk PCa patients.

The Influence of Androgen Deprivation Therapy on Prostate Size and Voiding Symptoms in Prostate Cancer Patients in Korea

Purpose

The goal of this study is to investigate the effects of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on total prostate volume and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).

Methods

Between January 2007 and June 2014, 110 patients who received androgen deprivation treatment were enrolled in this retrospective study. Clinical parameters and urodynamic parameters along with changes at follow-up were analyzed. Factors such as reduction in prostate volume, changes in LUTS, and prostate volume tertiles were compared 1 year after ADT.

Results

After ADT, the total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) score decreased from 17.45 to 12.21 and the IPSS voiding subscore decreased from 9.16 to 6.24. Maximal uroflow rate increased from 8.62 to 11.50 mL/sec and residual urine also reduced significantly by 29.34 mL. Change in prostate size was more prominent (–51.14%) in the patients with less than 1 year of ADT (n=21) than those who had more than 1 year of treatment (n=89, –44.12%). The decrease in the IPSS voiding subscore was greater within 1 year of ADT than after 1 year of treatment (–4.10 vs. –2.65). The differences were more significant in the 30–50 g group (n=59) and >50 g group (n=11) than the <30 g group (n=40) of the IPSS voiding subscore improvement (–3.76 , –4.91 vs. –2.10), and maximal uroflow rate improvement (2.78, 2.90 vs 1.49).

Conclusion

ADT resulted in statistically significant clinical improvement in terms of prostate volume, urodynamic parameters, and LUTS for patients with prostate cancer when analyzed by ADT duration and prostate volume.

Efficacy of neoadjuvant bicalutamide and dutasteride as a cytoreductive regimen before prostate brachytherapy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the cytoreductive effectiveness of combined neoadjuvant bicalutamide and dutasteride before prostate brachytherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

From April 2003 to May 2005, 31 patients opted for cytoreduction with bicalutamide (50 mg daily) and dutasteride (0.5 mg daily). Before, and at 3 months (90 +/- 5 days) after, the initiation of medical therapy, all patients underwent a transrectal ultrasound volumetric study of the prostate gland, with ellipsoid volume determination of the prostate gland and transition zone. The variables analyzed included pretreatment and posttreatment prostate and transition zone volumes and changes in width, height, and length of the prostate gland and transition zone. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors for prostate gland and transition zone volume reduction.

RESULTS

Before the initiation of bicalutamide and dutasteride, the mean prostate volume was 54.3 cm3 by planimetric summation and 49.7 cm3 by ellipsoid volume calculation. After a 3-month course of combination medical therapy, the average prostate volume was 36.1 cm3 (33.6% reduction) and 32.5 cm3 (34.6% reduction) using the volumetric and ellipsoid volume determinations, respectively. Bicalutamide and dutasteride resulted in a 39.8% reduction in transition zone volume (20.8 cm3 versus 12.4 cm3). The prostate gland and transition zone dimensions (width, height, and length) decreased about 11.4% to 19.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

The prostate gland and transition zone volume reductions after a 3-month course of neoadjuvant bicalutamide and dutasteride are comparable to previous reports of volume reduction using a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist with or without an antiandrogen.

Factors influencing risk of acute urinary retention after TRUS-guided permanent prostate seed implantation

PURPOSE

To look for factors predictive of acute urinary retention (AUR) after permanent seed prostate brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From March 1999 to February 2001, 150 permanent seed prostate implants were performed at Princess Margaret Hospital (Stage T1c, n = 113; T2a, n = 37; mean prostate-specific antigen level 5.9 ng/mL, prescription dose 145 Gy per Task Group No. 43). alpha-Blockers were used routinely after implantation. Dosimetry was based on the 1-month postimplant CT scan. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and catheterization were recorded at 1 month and 3 months and then every 3 months. The following variables were examined: age, baseline IPSS, prior androgen ablation, prostate transrectal ultrasound volume, number of seeds, D(90), V(100), V(200), and urethral dose.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (13%) experienced AUR. No difference was seen in the mean D(90) (149 Gy vs. 152 Gy, p = 0.6), V(100) (90% vs. 91%, p = 0.6), V(200) (23% vs. 25% p = 0.4), IPSS (6.4 vs. 5.9, p = 0.8), or maximal urethral dose (204 Gy vs. 210 Gy, p = 0.5). The prostate volume was significantly larger in men with AUR (39.8 cm(3) vs. 34.3 cm(3), p = 0.003), and the mean number of seeds was higher (112 vs. 103, p = 0.006). Of the 20 patients experiencing AUR, 11 (55%) had received prior antiandrogen therapy to downsize their prostates vs. 35 (27%) of the 130 who did not have AUR (p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis showed prostate volume and prior hormone use to be independent predictors of AUR.

CONCLUSIONS

Implant quality as determined by D(90), V(100), V(200), and urethral dose did not predict AUR. Prostate size was the major determinant of AUR. For any given prostate size, prior androgen ablation increased the risk of AUR. Men with larger prostates should be aware of the increased risk when contemplating brachytherapy.