New pieces to the hepatitis C treatment puzzle

Providing treatment for hepatitis C in an Australian district centre

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) poses a major public health problem world wide. The introduction of combined therapy (interferon and ribavirin) and the recent development of pegylated interferon have offered the opportunity to alter the natural history of HCV, potentially reducing morbidity and mortality. Until recently, treatment has been confined to larger Australian cities. This paper describes the establishment of a clinic for the treatment of HCV in a regional Australian city. The facilities of the sexual health clinic were utilised. Factors contributing to the success of the clinic include the specialist nurse, a multidisciplinary approach, and the service model of shared care with general practitioners. The patient population and the outcomes of managing HCV in a regional centre are described. The sustained viral response rate is comparable to the published data from specialist centres.

A randomized 4-arm multicenter study of interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C relapsing after interferon monotherapy

To determine whether a higher dosage of interferon (IFN) and/or a prolonged time of administration may improve the efficacy of combination therapy, we conducted a 4-arm randomized trial on patients with chronic hepatitis C relapsing after 1 or more previous treatment courses with IFN monotherapy. Group A (n = 70) received 3 MU IFN alfa-2b 3 times per week plus ribavirin 1,000 mg/d for 12 months; group B (n = 70) received 5 MU 3 times per week plus ribavirin for 12 months; group C (n = 82) received 3 MU 3 times per week plus ribavirin for 6 months, and group D (n = 73) received 5 MU 3 times per week plus ribavirin for 6 months. The primary end point was the clearance of viremia at the end of 6-month follow-up: test results for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA were negative in 54% of group A, 56% of group B, 40% of group C, and 49% of group D patients (P = NS). Among patients with genotype 1 and 4, the sustained response was significantly higher in groups A and B than in group C (45%, 49% vs. 22%, P =.03; group D = 33%, P = NS). In patients with genotype 2 and 3, the sustained virologic response was not affected by the different regimens (group A = 69%, group B = 68%, group C = 62%, group D = 71%, P = NS). In conclusion, duration of therapy rather than IFN dosage is more important in increasing the sustained virologic rate among HCV-positive patients with genotype 1 and 4 relapsing after IFN monotherapy; patients with genotypes 2 and 3 can be effectively retreated with a 6-month course of combination therapy, avoiding unnecessary side effects and waste of resources.