Short-term effects of statin therapy in patients with hyperlipoproteinemia after liver transplantation: results of a randomized cross-over trial

Statins on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 14 RCTs

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is rising rapidly in the world. Our aim is to investigate the efficacy and safety of statins in the treatment of NAFLD.

METHODS

This study was conducted by searching The National Library of Medicine, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Web of Science, and Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform databases. Literature data are expressed as mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) or relative risk and 95% CI. For I2 > 50% trials, random effect model is used for statistical analysis, otherwise fixed effect model is used.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies are selected for this meta-analysis, which includes totally 534 patients in the treatment group and 527 patients in the control group. As a result, 5 studies show that the total effective rate of the treatment group is 17% higher than that of the control group (Z = 2.11, relative risk = 1.17, 95% CI: [1.01-1.35]). Twelve studies show that alanine aminotransferase levels of the experimental group are lower than that of the control group (Z = 2.63, P = .009, MD = -5.53, 95% CI: [-9.64 to -1.41]). Eleven studies show that aspartate transaminase levels of the experimental group are lower than that of the control group (Z = 2.01, P = .04, MD = -3.43, 95% CI: [-6.77 to -0.08]). Six studies show that alkaline phosphatase levels of the experimental group are lower than that of the control group (Z = 0.79, P = .43, MD = -3.46, 95% CI: [-12.08 to 5.16]). Eight studies show that gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase levels of the experimental group are lower than that of the control group (Z = 2.04, P = .04, MD = -4.05, 95% CI: [-7.96 to -0.15]). Thirteen studies show that triglyceride levels of the experimental group are lower than that of the control group (Z = 4.15, P < .0001, MD = -0.94, 95% CI: [-1.39 to -0.50]). Eleven studies show that the total cholesterol levels of the experimental group are lower than that of the control group (Z = 5.42, P < .00001, MD = -1.51, 95% CI: [-2.05 to -0.96]). Seven studies show that low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels of the experimental group are lower than that of the control group (Z = 5.00, P < .00001, MD = -0.85, 95% CI: [-1.18 to -0.52]).

CONCLUSION

Statins can significantly reduce liver biochemical indicators in patients with NAFLD.

Atherogenic Dyslipidemia After Liver Transplantation: Mechanisms and Clinical Implications

Cardiovascular disease (CVD), particularly atherosclerosis-associated CVD, is a major cause of long-term mortality after liver transplantation (LT). The liver is central in lipid homeostasis, and changes associated with insulin resistance, weight gain, adipose tissue inflammation, and development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) after LT promote atherogenesis. These factors synergistically alter lipid homeostasis, thereby leading to the production of proatherogenic lipoproteins, which contribute to the heighted risk of CVD-associated events observed in LT recipients. Although the exact mechanism promoting this shift of a proatherogenic lipoprotein profile is currently not known, the choice of immunosuppression and preexisting metabolic risk factors (ie, NAFLD) are likely contributors. This shift in proatherogenic lipoprotein subparticles presents clinical challenges as the traditional lipid profile employed in clinical practice may not fully capture this atherogenic risk. This review focuses on lipoprotein metabolism and atherogenesis in LT recipients.

The Underutilization, Adverse Reactions and Efficacy of Statins after Liver Transplant: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

(1) Background: Treatment of dyslipidemia via statin therapy in the non-liver transplant (LT) population is associated with a mortality benefit; however, the impact of statin therapy in post-LT population is not well-defined. This meta-analysis seeks to investigate the safety and efficacy of statin therapy in post-LT patients. (2) Methods: A systematic literature search on Medline and EMBASE database was conducted. A single-arm proportional meta-analysis and conventional pair-wise meta-analysis were performed to compare different outcomes with a random effects model. (3) Results: A total of 11 studies were included in this study, with 697 LT recipients identified to be on statin therapy. Statins were underutilized with only 32% (95% CI: 0.15–0.52) of 1094 post-LT patients on therapy. The incidence of adverse events of 14% (95% CI: 0.05–0.25) related to statin therapy was low. A significant mortality benefit was noted in patients on statin therapy with HR = 0.282 (95% CI: 0.154–0.517, p < 0.001), and improved lipid profiles post LT. The use of statins also significantly decreased odds of graft rejection (OR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.15–0.73) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence (HR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.11–0.89). (4) Conclusions: Statin therapy is safe and efficacious in post-LT patients. Future studies to evaluate the effects of interactions between statins and immunosuppressant therapy are warranted.

Statin Safety and Associated Adverse Events: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

One in 4 Americans >40 years of age takes a statin to reduce the risk of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and other complications of atherosclerotic disease. The most effective statins produce a mean reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol of 55% to 60% at the maximum dosage, and 6 of the 7 marketed statins are available in generic form, which makes them affordable for most patients. Primarily using data from randomized controlled trials, supplemented with observational data where necessary, this scientific statement provides a comprehensive review of statin safety and tolerability. The review covers the general patient population, as well as demographic subgroups, including the elderly, children, pregnant women, East Asians, and patients with specific conditions such as chronic disease of the kidney and liver, human immunodeficiency viral infection, and organ transplants. The risk of statin-induced serious muscle injury, including rhabdomyolysis, is <0.1%, and the risk of serious hepatotoxicity is ≈0.001%. The risk of statin-induced newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus is ≈0.2% per year of treatment, depending on the underlying risk of diabetes mellitus in the population studied. In patients with cerebrovascular disease, statins possibly increase the risk of hemorrhagic stroke; however, they clearly produce a greater reduction in the risk of atherothrombotic stroke and thus total stroke, as well as other cardiovascular events. There is no convincing evidence for a causal relationship between statins and cancer, cataracts, cognitive dysfunction, peripheral neuropathy, erectile dysfunction, or tendonitis. In US clinical practices, roughly 10% of patients stop taking a statin because of subjective complaints, most commonly muscle symptoms without raised creatine kinase. In contrast, in randomized clinical trials, the difference in the incidence of muscle symptoms without significantly raised creatinine kinase in statin-treated compared with placebo-treated participants is <1%, and it is even smaller (0.1%) for patients who discontinued treatment because of such muscle symptoms. This suggests that muscle symptoms are usually not caused by pharmacological effects of the statin. Restarting statin therapy in these patients can be challenging, but it is important, especially in patients at high risk of cardiovascular events, for whom prevention of these events is a priority. Overall, in patients for whom statin treatment is recommended by current guidelines, the benefits greatly outweigh the risks.

Statins and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the era of precision medicine: More friends than foes

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) describes a spectrum of alcohol-like hepatic histological changes, which occur in the absence of any competing causes of chronic liver disease, notably including significant alcohol consumption. A close and bi-directional relationship links NAFLD with the metabolic syndrome (MetS), and concurrent MetS will hasten the progression to more severe forms of NAFLD, including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients with NAFLD will typically exhibit atherogenic dyslipidemia and increased cardiovascular risk (CVR). Statins are among the most widely prescribed lipid-lowering drugs. Their use has historically been hampered, in individuals with liver disease, owing to the fear of hepatotoxicity. However, studies suggest that statins are not only effective in reducing cardiovascular events, but may also exert multiple beneficial effects on the liver. CVR in those with NAFLD has extensively been covered by our group and others. This updated clinical narrative review will critically examine the effects of statins on the pathogenesis of NAFLD, including the key elementary pathological lesions of NAFLD, i.e. steatosis, inflammation and fibrosis, and its liver-related complications, i.e. cirrhosis, portal hypertension and HCC.

Statins and the Liver

Lipid lowering, particularly with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors ("statins"), reduces the risk of cardiovascular disease. Patients with chronic liver disease present challenges to the use of lipid medications. In the case of most liver disorders, the concern has been one of safety. There is evidence that most lipid-lowering medications can be used safely in many situations, although large outcomes trials are lacking. This review examines lipid physiology and cardiovascular risk in specific liver diseases and reviews the evidence for lipid lowering and the use of statins in chronic liver disease.

Appraising cardiac dysfunction in liver transplantation: an ongoing challenge

End-stage liver disease (ESLD) is a multisystemic disease that adversely and mutually aggravates other organs such as the heart. Cardiac dysfunction in ESLD encompasses a spectrum of disease that could be aggravated, precipitated or be occurring hand-in-hand with coexisting aetiological factors precipitating cirrhosis. Additionally and more complexly, liver transplantation, the curative modality of ESLD, is responsible for additional intra- and postoperative short- and long-term cardiac morbidity. The phenotypic distinction of the different forms of cardiac dysfunction in ESLD albeit important prognostically and therapeutically is not allowed by the current societal recommendations, due to conceptual, and methodological limitations in the appraisal of cardiac function and structure in ESLD and in designing studies that are based on this appraisal. This review comprehensively discusses the spectrum of cardiac dysfunction in ESLD, discusses the limitations of the current appraisal of cardiac dysfunction in ESLD, and proposes a hypothetical approach for studying cardiac dysfunction in liver transplant candidates.

Cardiovascular complications after transplantation: treatment options in solid organ recipients

Premature cardiovascular disease is the commonest cause of death in solid organ transplant recipients, with coronary artery disease, sudden cardiac death and heart failure being highly prevalent. There are unique factors leading to CV disease in organ transplant recipients that include underlying comorbidities, and metabolic effects of immunosuppression. As a consequence management strategies developed in the general population may have limited benefit. In this review, we will focus on renal transplantation, where most research has been carried out and, despite incomplete understanding of the disease process, the incidence of cardiovascular disease appears to be falling.

Pediatric post-transplant metabolic syndrome: new clouds on the horizon

Liver transplantation (LT) is a standard treatment for children with end-stage liver disease, standing at more than 90% survival rate after one yr, and at over a 70% survival rate after five yr. The majority of transplanted children enjoy an excellent quality of life but complications can occur in the long term, and can develop subclinically in otherwise well children; there are various underestimated nutritional and metabolic aspects, including the so-called post-transplant metabolic syndrome (PTMS). During the post-transplant period, the use of immunosuppressants, corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and the presence of risk factors, including non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and kidney and bone complications have been largely implicated in PTMS development. Strategies to reduce the progression of PMTS should include careful screening of patients for diabetes, dyslipidemia, and obesity, and to support weight reduction with a carefully constructed program, particularly based on diet modification and exercise. With early identification and appropriate and aggressive management, excellent long-term health outcomes and acceptable graft survival can be achieved.

Long-term outcome after liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is a life-saving therapy for patients with end-stage liver disease, acute liver failure, and liver tumors. Over the past 4 decades, improvements in surgical techniques, peritransplant intensive care, and immunosuppressive regimens have resulted in significant improvements in short-term survival. Focus has now shifted to addressing long-term complications and improving quality of life in liver recipients. These include adverse effects of immunosuppression; recurrence of the primary liver disease; and management of diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, renal dysfunction, osteoporosis, and de novo malignancy. Issues such as posttransplant depression, employment, sexual function, fertility, and pregnancy must not be overlooked, as they have a direct impact on the liver recipient's quality of life. This review summarizes the latest data in long-term outcome after liver transplantation.

Coronary artery disease in orthotopic liver transplantation: pretransplant assessment and management

The prevalence of coronary artery disease in end-stage liver disease is only now being recognized. Liver transplant patients are a high risk subgroup for coronary artery disease, even if asymptomatic. Coronary artery disease is a predictor of poor outcomes; therefore, identification of those at risk must be a key clinical priority. However, risk assessment is particularly difficult as many of the available diagnostic tools have either proven to be unhelpful or remain to be validated. Risk factor profiling has been unable to identify those at risk and commonly underestimates risk. The high negative predictive value of Dobutamine stress echo, when target heart rates are achieved, allows it to be used to identify a low risk group. For all other patients, proceeding to invasive coronary angiography is often necessary, and the risks of the procedure can be reduced by a transradial approach. Pharmacological reduction of the consequences of coronary artery disease can be limited by the underlying liver disease. Revascularization pre-transplantation is recommended in international guidelines but has demonstrated little evidence of benefit. Surgical revascularization carries an increased risk in these patients and is commonly performed pre-transplantation, although combined liver and cardiac surgery has been described. Percutaneous coronary intervention is increasingly used with patients requiring anti-platelet medication for up to one year after intervention. We present a review of all these issues and the evidence for assessing and managing these high-risk patients.

Statins in the treatment of dyslipidemia in the presence of elevated liver aminotransferase levels: a therapeutic dilemma

The beneficial role of statins in primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease has resulted in their frequent use in clinical practice. However, safety concerns, especially regarding hepatotoxicity, have driven multiple trials, which have demonstrated the low incidence of statin-related hepatic adverse effects. The most commonly reported hepatic adverse effect is the phenomenon known as transaminitis, in which liver enzyme levels are elevated in the absence of proven hepatotoxicity. This class effect is usually asymptomatic, reversible, and dose-related. However, the increasing incidence of chronic liver diseases, including nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatitis C, has created a new challenge when initiating statin treatment in patients with high cardiovascular risk. These diseases result in abnormally high liver biochemistry values, discouraging statin use by clinicians, fostering treatment discontinuation, and leaving a large number of at-risk patients untreated. A PubMed/MEDLINE search of the literature regarding statin safety (January 1, 1994-December 31, 2008) was performed, using the following search terms: statin safety, statin-related hepatotoxicity, and chronic liver disease and statin use, as well as the specific names of different statins and different liver diseases. Relevant clinical trials, review articles, panel discussions, and guideline recommendations were selected. This review supports the use of statin treatment in patients with high cardiovascular risk whose elevated aminotransferase levels have no clinical relevance or are attributable to known stable chronic liver conditions. For each patient, the decision should be based on an individual assessment of risks and benefits.

Primary care of the transplant patient

A total of 153,245 patients are living with a solid organ transplant in the US. In addition, patients are experiencing high 5-year survival rates after transplantation. Thus, primary care physicians will be caring for transplanted patients. The aim of this review is to update primary care physicians on chronic diseases, screening for malignancy, immunizations, and contraception in the transplant patient. Several studies on the treatment of hypertension and hyperlipidemia demonstrate that most agents used to treat the general population also can be used to treat transplant recipients. Little information exists on the medical management of diabetes in the transplant population, but experts in the area believe that the treatment of diabetes should be similar. Transplant recipients are at increased risk for all malignancies. Aggressive screening should be employed for all cancers with a proven screening benefit. Killed immunizations are safe for the transplant population, but live virus vaccines should be avoided. Women of childbearing age should be counseled about the impact of immunosuppressants on the efficacy and side effects of contraception.

Impact of lipid lowering therapy on liver function

A cardiovascularis megbetegedések hazánkban is vezetik a morbiditási és mortalitási statisztikákat. Ezen betegségek kialakulásában jelentős szerepet játszik a hyperlipidaemia. A korábbi nagy prospektív multicentrikus tanulmányok azt igazolták, hogy a hatékony lipidcsökkentő kezelés jelentős mértékű cardiovascularis halálozás-összhalálozás csökkenést eredményez. Ez a hatás függ az LDL-C-csökkentés mértékétől, amely gyakran csak a nagy dózisban alkalmazott statinkészítményekkel éri el a kívánt szintet. A nagy dózisban alkalmazott statinok a betegek körülbelül 3%-ában hozhatnak létre májkárosító hatást. A szerzők jelen munkájukban röviden ismertetik a lipidcsökkentő gyógyszerek hatásait, azokat a mechanizmusokat, amelyek a szerek potenciális májkárosító hatásának hátterében állhatnak. Felhívják a figyelmet arra, hogy a korábbi gyakorlattól eltérően, emelkedett transzaminázszintek esetén, sőt, bizonyos májbetegségekben is biztonságosan alkalmazhatóak a lipidcsökkentő készítmények. Természetesen akkor, ha megfelelő dózisban vagy kombinációban alkalmazzuk a gyógyszereket, és figyelemmel vagyunk azon tényezőkre, amelyek fokozhatják a nem kívánt mellékhatásokat. Ezen szempontok betartása mellett magas cardiovascularis rizikójú, egyébként krónikus májbetegségben szenvedők számára is biztosíthatjuk a lipidcsökkentők nyújtotta kedvező hatásokat anélkül, hogy fokoznánk a máj károsodását.

Incidence of adverse events with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in liver transplant patients

Transplant patients are at increased risk of developing dyslipidemia, which contributes to coronary artery disease and cardiovascular events. The purpose of this study was to explore documented adverse effects of liver transplant recipients receiving lipid-lowering therapies.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 69 liver transplant patients was conducted to evaluate the incidence of adverse effects, especially rhabdomyolysis and liver function abnormalities, in liver transplant patients treated with a lipid lowering agent (LLA). Data were collected from the time of initiation of LLA to 12 months later, looking at the type, dose, and duration of LLA, concurrent cytochrome P450 inhibitors, immunosuppression used, and laboratory parameters.

RESULTS

For HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor therapy, simvistatin was used in five (7.8%) patients, pravastatin in 40 (62.5%), fluvastatin in one (1.6%), atorvastatin in five (7.8%), and lovastatin in three (4.7%). Gemfibrozil, a fibric acid derivative, was employed as monotherapy in 10 (15.6%) of patients. There were five patients who received combination therapy with a fibric acid derivative, four (80%) with gemfibrozil + pravastatin, and one (20%) with gemfibrozil + simvastatin. Six patients studied had adverse effects, five (7.2%) with myalgia and one (1.4%) with myopathy. LLA monotherapy with either pravastatin or atorvastatin was used in these patients. The five patients with myalgia were on concurrent therapy with cyclosporin, and the patient with myopathy was on concurrent cyclosporin + diltiazem therapy, both of which are P450 inhibitors. One out of 23 patients on a non-immunosuppressant P450 inhibitor developed adverse effects. No significant elevation of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, or alkaline phosphatase was noted in any patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, there was a general tolerability with a low incidence of adverse events, no incidence of severe complications, and no alterations in liver function tests in the study population with the use of LLA.

Resolving hyperlipidemia after liver transplantation in a patient with primary sclerosing cholangitis

A 64-year-old man with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and resultant liver failure presented to our hospital with severe dyslipidemia (total cholesterol, 525 mg/dL; low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, 489 mg/dL; high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, 13 mg/dL; triglycerides, 114 mg/d) and coronary artery disease. The abnormal lipid profile of patients with cholestatic liver disease, such as PSC, includes an abnormal atherogenic LDL called lipoproteinX. The patient's dyslipidemia persisted despite treatment with a statin. Lipids normalized only after liver transplantation (total cholesterol, 135 mg/dL; LDL cholesterol, 60 mg/dL; high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, 48 mg/dL; triglycerides, 130 mg/dL). To the best of our knowledge, the dramatic improvement in the lipid profile after liver transplantation represents the first such published report for PSC. The recognition of dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis in those with cholestatic liver disease and the normalization of lipid profile after liver transplantation warrant further study. We present a review of dyslipidemia in cholestatic liver disease, its relationship to atherosclerosis, and its treatment.

Immunosuppression: towards a logical approach in liver transplantation

Over the last two decades there has been a significant increase in the number and types of immunosuppressive agents that have been available to clinicians. The protocols for immunosuppression used in liver transplantation have been derived historically from those in renal transplantation. During the last decade there has been a shift in the use of immunosuppression, with the introduction of interleukin (IL)-2 receptor antagonists in place of anti-lymphocyte preparations, substitution of tacrolimus for cyclosporin and mycophenolate for azathioprine. The use of corticosteroids has been reduced. For a variety of reasons, these changes have not always been made on the basis of properly randomized studies. The place of newer agents, such as sirolimus and leflunomide derivatives and of the microbiological agents, is unclear. In this review, we outline briefly the mechanism of action of drugs and suggest possible approaches to the management of the liver allograft recipient, suggesting how treatment could be adjusted according to the indication for transplantation as well as the individual's comorbidities.

Patients with elevated liver enzymes are not at higher risk for statin hepatotoxicity

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Studies that evaluate the risk of hepatotoxicity from statins in hyperlipidemic subjects with elevated baseline serum transaminases are lacking. We conducted a study to test the hypothesis that patients with elevated baseline liver enzymes have higher risk of statin hepatotoxicity.

METHODS

Our study consisted of the following 3 cohorts of patients seen between January 1, 1998 and June 31, 2002: Cohort 1: 342 hyperlipidemic patients with elevated baseline enzymes (AST >40 IU/L or ALT >35 IU/L) who were prescribed a statin; cohort 2: 1437 hyperlipidemic patients with normal transaminases who were prescribed a statin; and cohort 3: 2245 patients with elevated liver enzymes but who were not prescribed a statin. The effect of statins on liver biochemistries was assessed over a 6-month period after statins were prescribed. Elevations in liver biochemistries during follow-up were categorized into mild-moderate or severe based on predefined criteria.

RESULTS

The incidence of mild-moderate elevations and severe elevations in liver biochemistries in cohort 1 were 4.7% and 0.6%, respectively. Compared with cohort 1, individuals in cohort 2 had lower incidence of mild-moderate elevations (1.9%, P = 0.002) but not severe elevations (0.2%, P = 0.2). However, between cohorts 1 and 3, there were no differences in the incidence of mild-moderate elevations (4.7% vs. 6.4%, respectively, P = 0.2) or severe elevations (0.6% vs. 0.4%, respectively, P = 0.6). Statin discontinuation during the follow-up was similar between cohorts 1 and 2 (11.1% vs. 10.7%, respectively, P = 0.8).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that individuals with elevated baseline liver enzymes do not have higher risk for hepatotoxicity from statins.