Endoscopic manometry of esophageal varices: evaluation of a balloon technique compared with direct portal pressure measurement

Managing portal hypertension in patients with liver cirrhosis

Portal hypertension is one cause and a part of a dynamic process triggered by chronic liver disease, mostly induced by alcohol or incorrect nutrition and less often by viral infections and autoimmune or genetic disease. Adequate staging - continuously modified by current knowledge - should guide the prevention and treatment of portal hypertension with defined endpoints. The main goals are interruption of etiology and prevention of complications followed, if necessary, by treatment of these. For the past few decades, shunts, mostly as intrahepatic stent bypass between portal and hepatic vein branches, have played an important role in the prevention of recurrent bleeding and ascites formation, although their impact on survival remains ambiguous. Systemic drugs, such as non-selective beta-blockers, statins, or antibiotics, reduce portal hypertension by decreasing intrahepatic resistance or portal tributary blood flow or by blunting inflammatory stimuli inside and outside the liver. Here, the interactions among the gut, liver, and brain are increasingly examined for new therapeutic options. There is no general panacea. The interruption of initiating factors is key. If not possible or if not possible in a timely manner, combined approaches should receive more attention before considering liver transplantation.

β-2 Adrenergic receptor gene polymorphism and response to propranolol in cirrhosis

AIM: To evaluate the association of β-2 adrenergic receptor (β₂-AR) gene polymorphism with response of variceal pressure to propranolol in cirrhosis.

METHODS: Sixty-four non-related cirrhotic patients participated in this study and accepted variceal pressure measurement before and after propranolol administration. Polymorphism of the β₂-AR gene was determined by directly sequencing of the polymerase chain reaction products from the DNA samples that were prepared from the patients.

RESULTS: The prevalence of Gly16-Glu/Gln27 and Arg16-Gln27 homozygotes, and compound heterozygotes was 29.7%, 10.9%, and 59.4%, respectively. Patients with cirrhosis with Gly16-Glu/Gln27 homozygotes had a greater decrease of variceal pressure after propranolol administration than those with Arg16-Gln27 homozygotes or with compound heterozygotes (22.4% ± 2.1%, 13.1% ± 2.7% and 12.5% ± 3.1%, respectively, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION: The variceal pressure response to propranolol was associated with polymorphism of β₂-AR gene. Patients with the Gly¹⁶-Glu/Gln²⁷ homozygotes probably benefit from propranolol therapy.

Effect of intravariceal sclerotherapy combined with esophageal mucosal sclerotherapy using small-volume sclerosant for cirrhotic patients with high variceal pressure

AIM: To explore the effect of intravariceal-mucosal sclerotherapy using small dose of sclerosant on the recurrence of esophageal varices.

METHODS: We randomly assigned 38 cirrhotic patients with previous variceal bleeding and high variceal pressure (> 15.2 mmHg) to receive endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) and combined intravariceal and esophageal mucosal sclerotherapy (combined group) using small-volume sclerosant. The end-points of the study were rebleeding and recurrence of esophageal varices.

RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 16 mo, varices recurred in 1 patient in the combined group as compared with 7 patients in the EVL group (P = 0.045). Rebleeding occurred in 3 patients in the EVL group as compared with 1 patient in the combined group (P = 0.687). No patient died in the two groups. No significant differences were observed between the two groups with respect to serious adverse events.

CONCLUSION: Intravariceal-mucosal sclerotherapy using small dose of sclerosant is more effective than EVL in decreasing the incidence of variceal recurrence for cirrhotic patients.

Effects of propranolol or propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate on variceal pressure in schistosomiasis

AIM: To compare the effects of propranolol (PR) to that of PR plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate (ISMN) on variceal pressure in patients with schistosomiasis.

METHODS: Forty-eight patients with schistosomiasis who had no previous variceal bleeding were treated with PR alone or PR plus ISMN. Seven patients refused variceal pressure manometry (3 receiving PR and 4 receiving PR plus ISMN). One patient withdrew from the trial due to headache after taking ISMN. At the time of termination, twenty patients were randomly assigned to treatment with PR plus ISMN or PR alone. The dose of PR was adjusted until the resting heart rate had been reduced by 25% or was less than 55 bpm. In the PR plus ISMN group, after PR was titrated to the same target, the dose of ISMN was increased up to 20 mg orally twice a day. Variceal pressure was measured using a noninvasive endoscopic balloon technique at the end of the 6-mo treatment period.

RESULTS: In 40 patients (20 in the PR group and 20 in the PR plus ISMN group), variceal pressure was measured before treatment and at the end of the 6-mo treatment period. PR or PR plus ISMN treatment caused a significant reduction in variceal pressure (PR group: from 24.15 ± 6.05 mmHg to 22.68 ± 5.70 mmHg, P = 0.001; PR plus ISMN group: from 25.69 ± 5.26 mmHg to 20.48 ± 5.43 mmHg; P < 0.001). The percentage decrease in variceal pressure was significant after PR plus ISMN compared with that after PR alone (15.93% ± 8.37% vs 6.05% ± 3.67%, P = 0.01). One patient in the PR plus ISMN group and two patients in the PR group had variceal bleeding during follow-up. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the incidence of variceal bleeding. In the PR plus ISMN group, three patients had headache and hypotension. The headache was mild and transient and promptly disappeared after continuation of the relevant drug in two patients. Only one patient withdrew from the trial due to severe and lasting headache after taking ISMN. No side effects occurred in the PR group.

CONCLUSION: PR plus ISMN therapy may be an alternative treatment for patients with schistosomiasis who have a high risk of bleeding.

Perendoscopic variceal pressure measurement

OBJECTIVES

In patients with cirrhosis, the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is the reference method for the assessment of portal hypertension (PHT). Variceal pressure (VP) may be measured at endoscopy, but its relationship to the HVPG remains controversial. The aim of the study was to retrospectively compare HVPG and VP values obtained in a cohort of patients with cirrhosis and PHT.

METHODS

Within 8 days (range: 6-10 days), 64 patients in a stable condition with biopsy-proven cirrhosis [alcoholic: 47; other 17; mean age: 56.5 yrs (35-70); mean Child-Pugh's score: 9.4 +/- 1.9; ascites: 37/64; previous variceal bleeding (="bleeders"): 24/64) and oesophageal varices (grade 2: 49; grade 3: 15)] underwent both measurement of the HVPG during transjugular liver biopsy and VP at endoscopy using a "home made" pressure sensitive gauge in the absence of needle puncture of the varix. Alcoholic hepatitis was present in 28 patients with alcoholic cirrhosis.

RESULTS

The pressure sensitive gauge was well tolerated. The mean HVPG and VP values were 18.5 +/- 3.4 mmHg and 19 +/- 3.7 mmHg, respectively. A significant difference was observed between "bleeders" (n=24) and non "bleeders" (n=40) in terms of VP values (21.4 +/- 3.3 vs 17.2 +/- 3.2 mmHg, P<0.001), but not for HVPG values (19.4 +/- 4.1 vs 17.9 +/- 2.8 mmHg, P=0.075). A positive correlation was observed between VP and HVPG values (r=0.62, P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this group of patients with cirrhosis and oesophageal varices, a "home-made" pressure sensitive gauge allowed a non invasive perendoscopic measurement of VP. The positive correlation between VP and HVPG values suggests that measurement of VP may be a reliable estimate of portal pressure in these patients.

Esophageal Varices: Evaluation with Transesophageal MR Imaging—Initial Experience

PURPOSE

To prospectively use transesophageal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to determine the morphologic and hemodynamic characteristics of esophageal varices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was approved by the ethics committee. All patients gave written informed consent. Forty-two patients (29 men, 13 women; mean age, 58 years +/- 11 [standard deviation]) with esophageal varices that were recently demonstrated at endoscopy were included in the study. MR imaging was performed by using a receiver probe that was placed in the esophagus. Black-blood T2-weighted MR images were obtained with cardiac triggering and navigator gating of the right hemidiaphragm. On these images, the maximal diameter, minimal diameter, and surface area of the largest esophageal varix were measured. Periesophageal and paraesophageal varices were recorded. A hemodynamic examination was performed in the last 21 patients to undergo MR imaging, which was used to obtain measurements of flow velocity and rate before and after intravenous injection of 50 mug of octreotide or a placebo. A Kruskal-Wallis test was used to assess differences in the diameter and surface area of the varices according to endoscopic grade. Hemodynamic changes observed after octreotide or placebo injection were compared by using an analysis of variance and a 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

Periesophageal varices were observed in 36 patients, and paraesophageal varices were observed in 32 patients. The minimal diameter, maximal diameter, and surface area of the esophageal varices at MR imaging differed significantly according to endoscopic grade (P < .001). In the periesophageal varices, the velocity and flow changes caused by octreotide differed significantly from those caused by the placebo (P < .001). A decrease in velocity (mean velocity change, -2.766 cm.sec(-1)) and flow (mean flow change, -0.455 mL.sec(-1)) was noted after octreotide injection, but no significant change in velocity (mean velocity change, 0.252 cm.sec(-1)) or flow (mean flow change, 0.018 mL.sec(-1)) was noted after placebo injection. The surface area of the varices did not change significantly after octreotide (mean change, -0.771 mm2) or placebo (mean change, -0.015 mm2) injection.

CONCLUSION

Transesophageal MR imaging is a feasible method to assess the morphologic and hemodynamic characteristics of esophageal varices before and after pharmacologic treatment.

Prospective evaluation of a clinical score for 60-day mortality after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt: Bonn TIPSS early mortality analysis

OBJECTIVE

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt (TIPSS) is increasingly used to treat complications of portal hypertension, but proven tools for risk assessment of early mortality are lacking.

DESIGN

The prospective evaluation of a new 60-day mortality score.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a tertiary medical centre, 30 consecutive TIPSS patients were analysed for early mortality predictors, such as Child-Pugh score, TIPSS urgency (elective: > or = 36 h or emergency: < 36 h after variceal bleeding), comorbidity (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE]-II) and clinical data. Main predictors (P< 0.01) in this group (group-1: Child-Pugh score 10A, 10B, 10C) were graded (1, 2 or 3 points representing low, medium and high risk, respectively) and summarized as a Bonn TIPSS early mortality (BOTEM) score. This score was then tested prospectively in the next 73 TIPSS patients (group-2: Child-Pugh score 14A, 42B, 17C).

RESULTS

Group 1 early mortality (30%) depended primarily on bilirubin (P< 0.005), APACHE-II (P < 0.001) and TIPSS urgency (P< 0.001). Added risk points (1, 2, 3) for bilirubin (< 3 mg/dl, 3-6 mg/dl, > 6 mg/dl, respectively), APACHE-II (< 10, 10-20, > 20 points, respectively) and urgency (elective, emergency, active bleeding, respectively) represented individual BOTEM score points. BOTEM was the best mortality predictor (P< 0.001); < or = / > 6 score points was the optimal cut-off, with 56% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value, 84% negative predictive value and 87% accuracy. In group 2, early mortality (8.2%) was again best predicted by BOTEM (P < 0.01) with the same cut-off and 67% sensitivity, 99% specificity, 80% positive predictive value, 97% negative predictive value and 96% accuracy.

CONCLUSION

BOTEM score based on bilirubin, comorbidity and TIPSS-urgency predicts rather reliably post-TIPSS 60-day mortality and might optimize TIPSS treatment.

Assessment of portal hypertension in humans

Patients suspected of having portal hypertension (either by clinical history, physical examination, or previous diagnosis) should undergo ultrasonography and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Ultrasonography, preferably using the duplex technique, can disclose the patency of the portal venous system, the presence of signs of portal hypertension (splenomegaly, portocollateral vessels, repermeabilization of the umbilical vein, and so forth) and provide additional information about liver, biliary, or pancreatic diseases that may be the cause of portal hypertension. Endoscopy can assess the presence and size of gastroesophageal varices, the appearance of the variceal wall, and the presence and severity of portal hypertensive gastropathy. Patients showing a patent portal vein should have hepatic vein catheterization to evaluate the presence of presinusoidal, sinusoidal, or postsinusoidal portal hypertension. Patients in whom presinusoidal portal hypertension is suspected (those having esophageal varices with an HVPG below 10 mm Hg) should have liver biopsy and percutaneous transhepatic measurement of portal pressure. In sinusoidal portal hypertension, the results of endoscopy and HVPG measurement are decisive for the therapeutic management of the patients. The authors' results indicate that, before starting prophylactic therapy with beta-blockers, all patients should undergo at least an hepatic vein catheterization to assess HVPG; it would be preferable to have a variceal pressure measurement also. These measurements must be repeated 3 to 4 weeks after the final dose of therapy has been reached to assess the risk of variceal bleeding or rebleeding.