Ascites and hepatorenal syndrome during cirrhosis: two entities or the continuation of the same complication?

Renal impairment in cirrhosis unrelated to hepatorenal syndrome

Renal impairment is common in liver disease and may occur as a consequence of the pathophysiological changes that underpin cirrhosis or secondary to a pre-existing unrelated insult. Nevertheless, the onset of renal impairment often portends a worsening prognosis. Hepatorenal syndrome remains one of the most recognized and reported causes of renal impairment in cirrhosis. However, other causes of renal impairment occur and can be classified into prerenal, intrinsic or postrenal, which are the subjects of the present review.

Hepatorenal syndrome: beyond liver failure

Critical care nurses occasionally confront patient conditions that are not common. One such condition is hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). Three primary processes contribute to regional alterations in circulation in the renal and splanchnic beds. These processes include effective hypovolemia from the massive release of vasoactive mediators, thereby underfilling circulation, systemic and splanchnic vasodilation along with renal vasoconstriction, and hyperdynamic circulation. A "second-hit" hypothesis, whereby a triggering event causes intravascular volume depletion, likely initiates the development of HRS. The idea of a second hit focuses the attention of the health care team on surveillance strategies to prevent or limit HRS in patients with advanced cirrhosis and ascites. The treatment goal is to restore systemic and splanchnic vasoconstriction, while promoting renal vasodilation, balance sodium, and achieve euvolemia. The critical care nurse must maintain ongoing education to care for the patient with this complex syndrome in order to prevent complications and death.

Regulatory processes interacting to maintain hepatic blood flow constancy: Vascular compliance, hepatic arterial buffer response, hepatorenal reflex, liver regeneration, escape from vasoconstriction

Constancy of hepatic blood flow (HBF) is crucial for several homeostatic roles. The present conceptual review focuses on interrelated mechanisms that act to maintain a constant HBF per liver mass. The liver cannot directly control portal blood flow (PF); therefore, these mechanisms largely operate to compensate for PF changes. A reduction in PF leads to reduced intrahepatic distending pressure, resulting in the highly compliant hepatic vasculature passively expelling up to 50% of its blood volume, thus adding to venous return, cardiac output and HBF. Also activated immediately upon reduction of PF are the hepatic arterial buffer response and an HBF-dependent hepatorenal reflex. Adenosine is secreted at a constant rate into the small fluid space of Mall which surrounds the terminal branches of the hepatic arterioles, portal venules and sensory nerves. The concentration of adenosine is regulated by washout into the portal venules. Reduced PFreduces the washout and the accumulated adenosine causes dilation of the hepatic artery, thus buffering the PF change. Adenosine also activates hepatic sensory nerves to cause reflex renal fluid retention, thus increasing circulating blood volume and maintaining cardiac output and PF. If these mechanisms are not able to maintain total HBF, the hemodynamic imbalance results in hepatocyte proliferation, or apoptosis, by a shear stress/nitric oxide-dependent mechanism, to adjust total liver mass to match the blood supply. These mechanisms are specific to this unique vascular bed and provide an excellent example of multiple integrative regulation of a major homeostatic organ.

Hemodynamic alterations in liver cirrhosis

In cirrhotic patients, portal hypertension is often associated with a hyperdynamic circulatory syndrome, with high cardiac output and reduced systemic vascular resistance and arterial pressure. The hyperdynamic circulatory syndrome is due to arterial vasodilation that mainly occurs in the splanchnic circulation, while vascular resistance in the other circulatory districts is normal or increased, accordingly with the degree of portal hypertension, liver impairment and activation of the renin-aldosterone and sympathetic nervous system. The mechanism(s) leading to splanchnic vasodilation is unclear. A favored hypothesis translocation of intestinal bacteria and/or some their products, such as endotoxin, into the interstitial space in the splanchnic organs results in the local release of vasodilating factors such as nitric oxide, carbon monoxide and others.

Contribution of hepatic adenosine A1 receptors to renal dysfunction associated with acute liver injury in rats

Acute liver injury is associated with renal insufficiency, whose mechanism may be related to activation of the hepatorenal reflex. We previously showed that intrahepatic adenosine is involved in activation of the hepatorenal reflex to restrict urine production in both healthy rats and in rats with cirrhosis. The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that activation of intrahepatic adenosine receptors is involved in the pathogenesis of the renal insufficiency seen in acute liver injury. Acute liver injury was induced by intraperitoneal injection of thioacetamide (TAA, 500 mg/kg) in rats. The animals were instrumented 24 hours later to monitor systemic, hepatic, and renal circulation and urine production. Severe liver injury developed following TAA insult, which was associated with renal insufficiency, as demonstrated by decreased (approximately 25%) renal arterial blood flow, a lower (approximately 30%) glomerular filtration rate, and decreased urine production. Further, the increase in urine production following volume expansion challenge was inhibited. Intraportal, but not intravenous, administration of a nonselective adenosine receptor antagonist, 8-phenyltheophylline, improved urine production. To specify receptor subtype, the effects of 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX, an adenosine A(1) receptor antagonist) and 3,7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine (DMPX, an adenosine A(2) receptor antagonist) were compared. Intraportal but not intravenous administration of DPCPX greatly improved impaired renal function induced by acute liver injury, and this beneficial effect was blunted in rats with liver denervation. In contrast, neither intraportal nor intravenous administration of DMPX showed significant improvement in renal function. In conclusion, an activated hepatorenal reflex, triggered by intrahepatic adenosine A(1) receptors, contributed to the pathogenesis of the water and sodium retention associated with acute liver injury.

Blockade of intrahepatic adenosine receptors improves urine excretion in cirrhotic rats induced by thioacetamide

BACKGROUND/AIMS

In healthy rats, we recently showed that reduced intrahepatic portal blood flow leads to activation of hepatic adenosine receptors and a nerve-induced decrease in urine production. We hypothesize that the impaired urine excretion in liver cirrhosis is related to an increase in intrahepatic adenosine.

METHODS

Anesthetized normal and thioacetamide-induced cirrhotic rats were instrumented for the measurement of urine flow, hepatic portal venous blood flow, and renal arterial blood flow. 8-Phenyltheophylline was used to block adenosine receptors.

RESULTS

Compared to normal rats, cirrhotic rats had a lower baseline urine flow (P<0.05). In both normal and cirrhotic rats, intraportal but not intravenous administration of 8-phenyltheophylline increased urine flow. Saline overload in normal rats increased urine flow (from 6.8+/-0.6 to 42.2+/-4.6 microlmin(-1)) and this ability was impaired in cirrhotic rats (from 3.9+/-0.4 to 6.2+/-0.9 microlmin(-1)). Intraportal, but not intravenous, administration of 8-phenyltheophylline partially restored the renal ability to excrete the saline load.

CONCLUSIONS

Impaired renal ability to excrete urine in liver cirrhosis is related to the activation of intrahepatic adenosine receptors, and this is consistent with our previous data showing renal regulation through a hepatorenal neural mechanism activated by intrahepatic adenosine.

Clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites

BACKGROUND

In patients with cirrhosis, refractory ascites is associated with a poor prognosis and is an indication for liver transplantation. However, factors that determine prognosis remain unclear.

AIMS

To investigate the predictive factors of prognosis in patients with refractory ascites.

METHODS

Seventy-five patients with refractory ascites were followed-up for 18+/-13 months (mean+/-SD) and survival was analyzed.

RESULTS

The 1-year probability of survival was 52%. Univariate analyses showed that older patients, hepatocellular carcinoma and diabetes, all assessed at entry, were associated with significantly increased risk ratios of death. The risk ratio of death was significantly lower in abstinent alcoholics than in patients with nonalcoholic cirrhosis. The risk ratio of death did not significantly differ between patients with nonalcoholic cirrhosis and nonabstinent alcoholics. Child-Pugh score at entry had no prognostic value. Multivariate analysis showed that older age, hepatocellular carcinoma, diabetes and abstinence were independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites, older age, hepatocellular carcinoma and diabetes, but not Child-Pugh score at entry, were independent predictive factors of poor survival while abstinence was an independent predictive factor of good survival. These findings should be taken into account when deciding on liver transplantation in patients with refractory ascites.

Anti-leukotriene drugs in the prevention and treatment of hepatorenal syndrome

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a peculiar form of progressive renal failure complicating the course of cirrhosis and ascites. The renal impairment of HRS is merely functional and potentially reversible. Notwithstanding, in spite of several encouraging attempts, a satisfactory medical treatment for HRS is still expected. Several pathophysiological mechanisms are active in HRS. Arachidonate metabolism derangements are among these, and prostaglandins and thromboxane antagonists have been tried with variable outcomes. Also leukotrienes (LT) appear to be involved in HRS. Three drugs (zileuton, montelukast and zafirlukast) interfering with LT synthesis and receptor binding are currently available, but they have not yet been tried in HRS. Accordingly, the author would like to suggest physicians engaged in care of these critical patients to consider a trial with these drugs-as well as with any future innovative agent active on the arachidonate-derived metabolic pathways.

Update on ascites and hepatorenal syndrome

Ascites is the most common complication occurring during liver cirrhosis. Even if a significant decrease in renal clearance may be observed in the first step of chronic active liver disease, renal impairment, at times complicated by the typical signs of hepatorenal syndrome, occurs only in patients with ascites, especially when tense and refractory. Experimental and clinical data seem to suggest a primary sodium and water retention in the pathogenesis of ascites, in the presence of an intrahepatic increase of hydrostatic pressure, which, by itself, physiologically occurs during digestion. Abnormal sodium and water handling leads to plasma volume expansion, followed by decreased peripheral vascular resistance and increased cardiac output. This second step is in agreement with the peripheral arterial vasodilation hypothesis, depicted by an increase in total blood volume, but with a decreased effective arterial blood volume. This discrepancy leads to the activation of the sympathetic nervous and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone systems associated with the progressive activation of the renal autacoid systems, especially, that of the arachidonic acid. During advanced cirrhosis, renal impairment becomes more sustained and renal autacoid vasodilating substances are less available, possibly due to a progressive exhaustion of these systems. At the same time ascites becomes refractory inasmuch as it is no longer responsive to diuretic treatment. Various pathogenetic mechanisms leading to refractory ascites are mentioned. Finally, several treatment approaches to overcome the reduced effectiveness of diuretic therapy are cited. Paracentesis, together with simultaneous administration of human albumin or other plasma expanders is the main common approach to treat refractory ascites and to avoid a further decrease in renal failure. Other effective tools are: administration of terlipressin together with albumin, implantation of the Le Veen shunt, surgical porto-systemic shunting or transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt, or orthotopic liver transplantation, according to the conditions of the individual patient.

Management of refractory ascites and hepatorenal syndrome

Refractory ascites and hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) are the late complications of the terminal stages of cirrhosis. The definitions of refractory ascites and HRS proposed by the International Ascites Club in 1996 are now widely accepted, and are useful in diagnosis, treatment and research in this field. In both conditions, the only treatment of proven value for improved survival is liver transplantation. However, because of better understanding about the pathophysiology of HRS, including the roles of portal hypertension, ascites formation and hemodynamic derangements, treatments such as transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic shunt (TIPS) and new pharmacological agents may be considered to alleviate the problem prior to transplantation. Symptomatic treatment of refractory ascites includes TIPS and repeated large volume paracentesis. Transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic shunt can improve survival while waiting for liver transplantation. Practical management guidelines for TIPS and large volume paracentesis, including the prevention and management of further complications, are considered in this review.

Increased plasma levels of neuropeptide Y in hepatorenal syndrome

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To investigate the relationship between neuropeptide Y (NPY), a potent renal vasoconstrictor peptide released upon marked stimulations of sympathetic nervous system (SNS), and renal and circulatory function in cirrhosis.

METHODS

Plasma levels of NPY (radioimmunoassay) and norepinephrine and renal function parameters were determined in 17 healthy controls, nine patients with cirrhosis without ascites, and 37 patients with cirrhosis and ascites, of whom 12 had hepatorenal syndrome (HRS).

RESULTS

Patients with ascites showed circulating levels of NPY similar to those of patients without ascites and controls (73+/-4, +/-4 and 68+/-4 pmol/l, respectively; NS). However, patients with HRS had significantly increased levels of NPY with respect to the other groups (110+/-6 pmol/l; P<0.001). NPY levels correlated inversely with renal plasma flow and glomerular filtration rate and directly with norepinephrine. In patients with HRS (n=6) treatment with terlipressin and albumin was associated with a marked improvement in circulatory and renal function and marked suppression of NPY and norepinephrine levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with HRS have increased levels of NPY which are related to circulatory dysfunction and SNS activation and may contribute to renal vasoconstriction.

Intrahepatic adenosine triggers a hepatorenal reflex to regulate renal sodium and water excretion

The mechanism for water and sodium retention in liver cirrhosis is related to the disturbance in hepatic portal circulation. We hypothesize that the increases in intraportal adenosine, which occur when the portal blood flow decreases, may trigger the hepatorenal reflex to inhibit renal water and sodium excretion. In anesthetized rats, intravenous vs. intraportal adenosine-induced effect on renal water and sodium excretion was compared in normal animals and animals with hepatic or renal denervation, and in the presence of an adenosine receptor antagonist. Compared to saline infusion, intraportal adenosine (0.02 mg kg(-1) min(-1) for 1 h) infusion decreased urine flow by 51.3% (11.7 +/- 2.3 vs. 5.7 +/- 0.5 microl min(-1)) for the first 30 min and by 49% (22.8 +/- 5.4 vs. 11.6 +/- 1.5 microl min(-1)) for the second 30-min duration. Urinary sodium excretion was also decreased. Intraportal administration of an adenosine receptor antagonist (8-phenyltheophylline (8-PT), 3 mg kg(-1) bolus injection followed by 0.05 mg kg(-1) min(-1) continuous infusion), as well as liver or kidney denervation, abolished adenosine-induced inhibition. In contrast, intravenous adenosine infusion had no influence on either urine flow or sodium excretion. The data indicated that selectively increased intraportal adenosine inhibited renal water and sodium excretion. The water and sodium retention commonly seen in the hepatorenal syndrome may be related to intraportal adenosine accumulation due to the decrease in intraportal portal flow.