Post-zygotic mutations and somatic mosaicism in androgen insensitivity syndrome

Somatic mosaicism of androgen receptor gene in an androgen insensitivity syndrome patient conceived through assisted reproduction technique

Background

Mutations of human androgen receptor (AR) gene are responsible for androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS). Variable phenotypes and androgen receptor binding activity have permitted the classification of AIS into complete (CAIS), partial (PAIS), and minimal or mild (MAIS) forms. Somatic mosaicism in AIS is a rare condition which happened when de novo mutations occur after the zygotic stage.

Methods

Clinical evaluation, hormone measurements, and molecular analysis were performed to diagnose the patient in the study.

Results

A 46, XY girl who conceived through in vitro fertilization (IVF), presented with partial virilization of external genitalia, was found to have the p.C620R in heterozygosity. The variant p.C620R of AR has been previously reported in a patient with completely feminized external genitalia, which was inherited from the heterozygote carrier mother. Mutation analysis of the mother of our patient revealed that the variant was de novo and presented as a somatic mosaicism which indicated an insufficient amount of wild‐type AR in our patient.

Conclusion

This is the first case that AIS was caused by de novo mutation of AR in a 46, XY Disorder of Sexual Development (DSD) patient by the assisted reproduction technique (ART). The phenotype of partial virilization could be explained by AR mutation in somatic mosaicism.

Androgen insensitivity syndrome: somatic mosaicism of the androgen receptor in seven families and consequences for sex assignment and genetic counseling

Androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS) is caused by numerous mutations of the androgen receptor (AR) gene. The phenotype may range from partial AIS (PAIS) with ambiguous genitalia to complete AIS (CAIS) with female genitalia. In 70% of the cases, AR mutations are transmitted in an X-linked recessive manner through the carrier mothers, but in 30%, the mutations arise de novo. When de novo mutations occur after the zygotic stage, they result in somatic mosaicisms, which are an important consideration for both virilization in later life-because both mutant and wild-type receptors are expressed-and genetic counseling. We report here six patients with AIS due to somatic mutations of the AR and one mother with somatic mosaicism who transmitted the mutation twice. Of the four patients with PAIS, three presented spontaneous or induced virilization at birth or puberty. These cases underline the crucial role of the remnant wild-type AR for virilization because the same mutations, when they are inherited, lead to CAIS. We also report two novel mutations of the AR, with somatic mosaicism, detected in patients with CAIS. Thus, the remnant wild-type receptor does not always lead to virilization. In one of these patients, a high ratio of wild-type to mutant AR expression was found in the gonads and genital skin fibroblasts. Although no prenatal virilization occurred, the possibility of virilization at puberty could not be excluded, and early gonadectomy was performed. A seventh patient had a CAIS with a novel germline AR mutation. The mutation was inherited from the mother, in whom mosaicism was detected in blood and who transmitted the mutation to a second, XX, offspring. The detection of somatic AR mutations is particularly important for the clinical management and genetic counseling of patients with AIS. Before definite sex assignment, a testosterone treatment trial should be performed in all patients with PAIS, but it becomes crucial when an AR mosaicism has been detected. In patients with CAIS or severe PAIS raised as female, there is no consensus about when (early childhood or puberty) gonadectomy should be performed. When somatic AR mutations are detected, however, gonadectomy should be performed earlier because of the risk of virilization during puberty. When a germline de novo mutation is identified in the index case, the risk of transmission to a second child due to a possible germ cell mosaicism in the mother cannot be excluded. However, given the high number of AR de novo mutations and the rarity of such reports, this risk appears to be very low.

Molecular basis of pubertal abnormalities

The causes of abnormal pubertal development are numerous. Recent molecular investigation has increased our understanding of the genetic basis of pubertal disorders. Investigators have identified some of the genes that are critical for normal puberty and have begun to elucidate the genes and pathogenesis of genetic disorders associated with abnormal pubertal development. Identification of specific chromosomal abnormalities and gene mutations allows for diagnostic testing and enables the clinician to provide accurate counseling of the recurrence risk for relatives. In the future, knowledge of the genetic basis of these disorders will facilitate the development of novel therapies and approaches to the fertility assessment and treatment of individuals with pubertal disorders. Although great strides have been made in identifying these genes, questions remain. Why do some genetic mutations affect puberty differentially in males and females? What is the long-term impact in terms of future fertility, and what is the risk to the offspring of such patients? Further research is needed to address these issues and to identify additional genetic loci involved in pubertal development.

Differential gene-expression patterns in genital fibroblasts of normal males and 46,XY females with androgen insensitivity syndrome: evidence for early programming involving the androgen receptor

BACKGROUND

Androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS) comprises a range of phenotypes from male infertility to complete feminization. Most individuals with AIS carry germline mutations of the androgen receptor (AR) that interfere with or ablate its function. As genital fibroblasts retain expression of the AR in vitro, we used genital skin fibroblasts from normal males and 46,XY females with complete AIS due to known AR mutations to gain insights into the role of the AR in human genital differentiation.

RESULTS

Using DNA microarrays representing 32,968 different genes, we identified 404 transcripts with significant differences in transcription levels between genital skin fibroblasts cultured from normal and AIS-affected individuals. Gene-cluster analyses uncovered coordinated expression of genes involved in key processes of morphogenesis. On the basis of animal studies and human genetic syndromes, several of these genes are known to have specific roles in genital differentiation. Remarkably, genital fibroblasts from both normal and AIS-affected individuals showed no transcriptional response to dihydrotestosterone treatment despite expression of the AR.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that in addition to differences in the anatomic origin of the cells, androgen signaling during prenatal development contributes to setting long-lasting, androgen-independent transcriptional programs in genital fibroblasts. Our findings have broad implications in understanding the establishment and the stability of sexual dimorphism in human genital development.