Regional differences of the inhibition of GABAB ligand binding by the GTP analogue Gpp(NH)p

Influence of positive allosteric modulators on GABA(B) receptor coupling in rat brain: a scintillation proximity assay characterisation of G protein subtypes

Little is known concerning coupling of cerebral GABA(B) receptors to G protein subtypes, and the influence of positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) has not been evaluated. These questions were addressed by an antibody-capture/scintillation proximity assay strategy. GABA concentration-dependently enhanced the magnitude of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to Galphao and, less markedly, Galphai(1/3) in cortex, whereas Gq and Gs/olf were unaffected. (R)-baclofen and SKF97581 likewise activated Galphao and Galphai(1/3), expressing their actions more potently than GABA. Similar findings were acquired in hippocampus and cerebellum, and the GABA(B) antagonist, CGP55845A, abolished agonist-induced activation of Galphao and Galphai(1/3) in all structures. The PAMs, GS39783, CGP7930 and CGP13501, inactive alone, enhanced efficacy and potency of agonist-induced [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to Galphao in all regions, actions abolished by CGP55845A. In contrast, they did not modify efficacies at Galphai(1/3). Similarly, in human embryonic kidney cells expressing GABA(B(1a+2)) or GABA(B(1b+2)) receptors, allosteric modulators did not detectably enhance efficacy of GABA at Galphai(1/3), though they increased its potency. To summarise, GABA(B) receptors coupled both to Galphao and to Galphai, but not Gq and Gs/olf, in rat brain. PAMs more markedly enhanced efficacy of coupling to Go versus Gi(1/3). It will be of interest to confirm these observations employing complementary techniques and to evaluate their potential therapeutic significance.

Binding characteristics of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid as a weak but selective GABAB receptor agonist

The aim of this study was to reexamine the concept that gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) is a weak but selective agonist at gamma-aminobutyric acidB (GABAB) receptors, using binding experiments with several radioligands. Ki values of GHB were similar (approximately equal to 100 microM) in three agonist radioligand assays for GABAB receptors, [3H]baclofen (beta-para-chlorophenyl-gamma-aminobutyric acid), [3H]CGP 27492 (3-aminopropyl-phosphinic acid) and [3H]GABA, in the presence of the GABAA receptor agonist isoguvacine with rat cortical, cerebellar and hippocampal membranes. In competition experiments between GHB and the GABAB receptor antagonist, [3H]CGP 54626 (3-N [1-{(S)-3,4-dichlorophenyl}-ethylamino]-2-(S)-hydroxypropyl cyclo-hexylmethyl phosphinic acid), the IC50 values were significantly increased with 300 microM of 5'-guanyl-imidodiphosphate (Gpp(NH)p), which suggested that guanine nucleotide binding proteins (G-proteins) modulate GHB binding on GABAB receptors. The inhibition by GHB of [3H]CGP 27492 binding in cortical membranes was not altered in the presence of 0.3 or 3 mM of the two GHB dehydrogenase inhibitors, valproate and ethosuximide. Thus, GHB is not reconverted into GABA by GHB dehydrogenase. Taken together, the results of this study demonstrated that GHB is an endogenous weak but selective agonist at GABAB receptors.