2
|
Yano R, Konno A, Watanabe K, Tsukamoto H, Kayano Y, Ohnaka H, Goto N, Nakamura T, Masada M. Pharmacoethnicity of docetaxel-induced severe neutropenia: integrated analysis of published phase II and III trials. Int J Clin Oncol 2011; 18:96-104. [PMID: 22095245 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-011-0349-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2011] [Accepted: 10/31/2011] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ethnic differences in drug susceptibility and toxicity are a major concern, not only in drug development but also in the clinical setting. We review the toxicity profiles of docetaxel according to dose and ethnicity. METHODS We analyzed phase II and III clinical trials that included a once-every-3-weeks single-agent docetaxel arm. Logistic regression analysis was applied to identify the significant variables affecting the reported incidence of docetaxel-induced severe neutropenia. RESULTS Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified studies conducted in Asia [odds ratio (OR) 19.0; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 3.64-99.0] and docetaxel dose (OR 1.08; 95% CI 1.03-1.13) as independent variables for the incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS There is a significant difference in the incidence of docetaxel-induced severe neutropenia between Asian and non-Asian clinical studies. Physicians and pharmacists should consider ethnic diversity in docetaxel toxicity when interpreting the results of clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryoichi Yano
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Fukui Hospital, 23-3 Matsuokashimoaizuki, Eiheiji-cho, Yoshida-gun, Fukui, 910-1193, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chan JK, Ueda SM, Sugiyama VE, Stave CD, Shin JY, Monk BJ, Sikic BI, Osann K, Kapp DS. Analysis of Phase II Studies on Targeted Agents and Subsequent Phase III Trials: What Are the Predictors for Success? J Clin Oncol 2008; 26:1511-8. [PMID: 18285603 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.14.8874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To identify the characteristics of phase II studies that predict for subsequent “positive” phase III trials (those that reached the proposed primary end points of study or those wherein the study drug was superior to the standard regimen investigating targeted agents in advanced tumors. Methods We identified all phase III clinical trials of targeted therapies against advanced cancers published from 1985 to 2005. Characteristics of the preceding phase II studies were reviewed to identify predictive factors for success of the subsequent phase III trial. Data were analyzed using the χ2 test and logistic regression models. Results Of 351 phase II studies, 167 (47.6%) subsequent phase III trials were positive and 184 (52.4%) negative. Phase II studies from multiple rather than single institutions were more likely to precede a successful trial (60.4% v 39.4%; P < .001). Positive phase II results were more likely to lead to a successful phase III trial (50.8% v 22.5%; P = .003). The percentage of successful trials from pharmaceutical companies was significantly higher compared with academic, cooperative groups, and research institutes (89.5% v 44.2%, 45.2%, and 46.3%, respectively; P = .002). On multivariate analysis, these factors and shorter time interval between publication of phase II results and III study publication were independent predictive factors for a positive phase III trial. Conclusion In phase II studies of targeted agents, multiple- versus single-institution participation, positive phase II trial, pharmaceutical company-based trials, and shorter time period between publication of phase II to phase III trial were independent predictive factors of success in a phase III trial. Investigators should be cognizant of these factors in phase II studies before designing phase III trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John K. Chan
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, San Francisco, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco; Department of Radiation Therapy, Division of Medical Oncology; Lane Medical Library & Knowledge Management Center, Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; and the Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, Medical Center, Orange, CA
| | - Stefanie M. Ueda
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, San Francisco, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco; Department of Radiation Therapy, Division of Medical Oncology; Lane Medical Library & Knowledge Management Center, Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; and the Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, Medical Center, Orange, CA
| | - Valerie E. Sugiyama
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, San Francisco, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco; Department of Radiation Therapy, Division of Medical Oncology; Lane Medical Library & Knowledge Management Center, Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; and the Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, Medical Center, Orange, CA
| | - Christopher D. Stave
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, San Francisco, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco; Department of Radiation Therapy, Division of Medical Oncology; Lane Medical Library & Knowledge Management Center, Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; and the Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, Medical Center, Orange, CA
| | - Jacob Y. Shin
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, San Francisco, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco; Department of Radiation Therapy, Division of Medical Oncology; Lane Medical Library & Knowledge Management Center, Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; and the Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, Medical Center, Orange, CA
| | - Bradley J. Monk
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, San Francisco, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco; Department of Radiation Therapy, Division of Medical Oncology; Lane Medical Library & Knowledge Management Center, Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; and the Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, Medical Center, Orange, CA
| | - Branimir I. Sikic
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, San Francisco, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco; Department of Radiation Therapy, Division of Medical Oncology; Lane Medical Library & Knowledge Management Center, Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; and the Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, Medical Center, Orange, CA
| | - Kathryn Osann
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, San Francisco, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco; Department of Radiation Therapy, Division of Medical Oncology; Lane Medical Library & Knowledge Management Center, Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; and the Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, Medical Center, Orange, CA
| | - Daniel S. Kapp
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, San Francisco, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco; Department of Radiation Therapy, Division of Medical Oncology; Lane Medical Library & Knowledge Management Center, Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; and the Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, Medical Center, Orange, CA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
The efficiency of single agent docetaxel in patients with platinum-refractory non-small cell lung carcinoma. Med Oncol 2008; 25:408-14. [PMID: 18320363 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-008-9055-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2007] [Accepted: 02/19/2008] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the efficiency of docetaxel as second line chemotherapy in patients with platinum-refractory non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty-two patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who had platinum-refractory disease (progressed through or within 3 months of completion of first line therapy) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance (ECOG) status 0-2 were treated with second-line chemotherapy consisting of single agent docetaxel (100 mg/m(2), intravenously, on day 1 of a 21-day cycle). The median number of treatment cycles was 4 (2-6). Disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS), response rates and toxicity were evaluated. RESULTS The median progression-free survival of patients was 3 months (95% CI: 0.01-5.99) and overall survival was 7.2 months (95% CI: 2.2-9.5). One-year overall survival rate was 29%. Disease control (complete response, partial response, or stable disease) was achieved in 25 patients (48%) and overall response rate was 13% (7 patients). There were no complete responses. Seventeen patients (33%) had stable disease and twenty-seven patients (52%) had progressive disease. Age, gender, stage at diagnosis (IIIB vs. IV), performance status at initiation of second-line therapy (0-1 vs. 2) histopathological type (epidermoid vs. others), grade, LDH, albumin, weight loss were evaluated as prognostic factors; however, none of these had a significant affect on survivals. The protocol was well tolerated and there were no toxic deaths. Grade III-IV anemia was present in 8 patients (15%) and thrombopenia in 12 (23%) patients. The most frequent grade 3-4 toxicities were leucopenia (52%) and neutropenia (48%). Febril neutropenia occurred in 14 patients (26%). No patients experienced grade III-IV mucositis and diarrhea. Totally, the need of a dose reduction was about 25% and treatment delay (4-9 days) occurred in 5 patients (10%) and 7 patients (13%), respectively, because of toxicity. CONCLUSIONS Second-line chemotherapy with single-agent docetaxel offers a small but significant survival advantage with acceptable toxicity for patients with advanced NSCLC who have platinum-refractory disease.
Collapse
|
7
|
Kurata T, Matsuo K, Takada M, Kawahara M, Tsuji M, Matsubara Y, Otani N, Matsuyama S, Muraishi K, Fujita T, Ishikawa M, Koyano K, Okamoto I, Satoh T, Tamura K, Nakagawa K, Fukuoka M. Is the Importance of Achieving Stable Disease Different between Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Cytotoxic Agents in the Second-Line Setting for Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer? J Thorac Oncol 2006. [DOI: 10.1016/s1556-0864(15)30382-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
8
|
Barlési F, Jacot W, Astoul P, Pujol JL. Second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review. Lung Cancer 2006; 51:159-72. [PMID: 16360238 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2005.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2005] [Accepted: 08/17/2005] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, most will resist or relapse after first-line chemotherapy. As a result, second-line therapy has been a major focus for clinical research. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review was carried out from 1996 to February 2005. RESULTS Second-line chemotherapy provides pre-treated NSCLC patients with a clear survival advantage. Docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks is the present standard second-line chemotherapy. Despite promising results regarding efficacy and toxicity in phase III studies, a docetaxel weekly schedule could not be recommended. Pemetrexed recently emerged as an alternative with similar efficacy and less toxicity. Although the combination of two drugs was not associated with a survival benefit when compared with single-agent chemotherapy, such regimens induced a dramatic increase in toxicities and therefore mono-chemotherapy remains the standard as second-line therapy. Finally, few new agents were reported with better results than those used previously and clinical research on second-line therapy currently focuses on combinations with targeted therapies. CONCLUSION Second-line chemotherapy offers NSCLC patients a small but significant survival improvement. However, this field of clinical research needs further investigations in order to answer certain remaining questions especially concerning targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrice Barlési
- Faculty of Medicine, Université de la Méditerranée, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Thoracic Oncology, Fédération des Maladies Respiratoires, Sainte-Marguerite Hospital, France.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Si MS, Imagawa DK, Ji P, Wei X, Holm B, Kwok J, Lee M, Reitz BA, Borie DC. Immunomodulatory effects of docetaxel on human lymphocytes. Invest New Drugs 2004; 21:281-90. [PMID: 14578678 DOI: 10.1023/a:1025408425660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Docetaxel is an antineoplastic taxoid that interferes with microtubule polymerization dynamics and is used clinically to treat advanced cancers. Because microtubules play significant roles in T lymphocyte activation and function we characterized the in vitro immunomodulatory properties of docetaxel. Effects of docetaxel on lectin-induced peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) proliferation were measured by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium (MTS) assay and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) staining. In addition, apoptosis was measured by annexin V staining and cell activation by determination of CD25 and CD71 cell surface expression. Intracellular calcium kinetics in lectin-activated Jurkat T lymphocytes exposed to docetaxel were investigated. Th1 cytokine production was assessed in T lymphocytes by intracellular cytokine staining. Docetaxel significantly inhibited PBMC proliferation and promoted apoptosis of lectin-activated PBMCs. Docetaxel significantly decreased expression of CD71 but not that of CD25. Docetaxel altered intracellular calcium homeostasis but did not affect Th1 cytokine production in T lymphocytes. In conclusion we demonstrate that docetaxel, although exerting significant antiproliferative effects on lymphocytes and promoting activation-induced apoptosis does affect only partially lymphocyte activation and function and does not affect Th1 cytokine production. These results suggest maintenance of lymphocyte functions important for host tumor surveillance and suggest that this compound may have a role in the treatment of cancer arising organ transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming-Sing Si
- Transplantation Immunology Laboratory, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5407, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Petrioli R, Pozzessere D, Messinese S, Sabatino M, Ceciarini F, Marsili S, Correale P, Fiaschi AI, Voltolini L, Gotti G, Francini G. Weekly low-dose docetaxel in advanced non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with two chemotherapy regimens. Lung Cancer 2003; 39:85-9. [PMID: 12499099 DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5002(02)00306-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of salvage chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still controversial, but the recent development of a number of active antineoplastic agents has created new possibilities for disease management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity and safety of weekly docetaxel treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC previously treated with two chemotherapy regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study involved 26 patients with histologically documented stage IIIB, IV or recurrent metastatic NSCLC previously treated with two non-taxane based-chemotherapy regimens. They all received docetaxel 25 mg/m(2)/week administered as a 1-h infusion in an outpatient setting with corticosteroid premedication. RESULTS Fourteen of the 26 patients (54%) had distant metastases and 12 (46%) chest-localised disease. Six patients (23%; confidence interval: 9.8-44.1%) showed a partial response, 8 (31%) stable disease, and 12 (46%) progressive disease. The median time to progression was 4 months (range 2-8), and the median survival was 7+ months (range 3-13+). There were no statistically significant differences between the global quality of life scores recorded at baseline and those recorded after subsequent cycles. The treatment was very well tolerated. CONCLUSION The results of this study suggest that weekly low-dose docetaxel is effective, well tolerated and maintains a relatively good quality of life in patients with advanced NSCLC previously exposed to two chemotherapy regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Petrioli
- Medical Oncology Division, Institute of Internal Medicine, University of Siena, Policlinico le Scotte, Viale Bracci 11, 53100, Siena, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|