Induction treatment before surgery for non-small cell lung cancer

The Impact of Immunotherapy Use in Stage IIIA (T1-2N2) NSCLC: A Nationwide Analysis

Introduction

Multiple clinical trials have revealed the benefit of immunotherapy (IO) for NSCLC, including unresectable stage III disease. Our aim was to investigate the impact of IO use on treatment and outcomes of potentially resectable stage IIIA NSCLC in a broader nationwide patient cohort.

Methods

We queried the National Cancer Database (2004-2019) for patients with stage IIIA (T1-2N2) NSCLC. Treatment and survival were evaluated with descriptive statistics, logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox proportional hazards modeling.

Results

Overall, 5.5% (3777 of 68,335) of patients received IO. IO use was uncommon until 2017, but by 2019, it was given to 40.1% (1544 of 2308) of stage IIIA patients. The increased use of IO after 2017 was associated with increased definitive chemoradiation treatment (54.2% [6800 of 12,535] from years 2017 to 2019 versus 46.9% [26,251 of 55,914] from 2004 to 2016, p < 0.001) and less use of surgery (18.1% [2266 of 12,535] from years 2017 to 2019 versus 22.0% [12,300 of 55,914] from 2004 to 2016, p < 0.001). IO treatment was associated with significantly better 5-year survival in the entire cohort (36.9% versus 23.4%, p < 0.001) and the subsets of patients treated with chemoradiation (37.2% versus 22.7%, p < 0.001) and surgery (48.6% versus 44.3%, p < 0.001). Pneumonectomy use decreased with increased IO treatment (5.1% of surgical patients [116 of 2266] from years 2017 to 2019 versus 9.2% [1127 of 12,300] from 2004 to 2016, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Increased use of IO was associated with a change in treatment patterns and improved survival for patients with stage IIIA(N2) NSCLC.

Long-Term Outcomes After Chemoradiotherapy and Surgery for Superior Sulcus Tumors

Introduction

Superior sulcus tumors (SSTs) are uncommon, and their anatomical location can make treatment challenging. We analyzed late outcomes of patients with SST treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection (trimodality) in a single tertiary institution.

Methods

Patients with non-small cell SSTs, who underwent trimodality therapy between 2002 and 2017, were selected from a prospective institutional surgical database. Patients were uniformly staged with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography, computed tomography scan of the chest and upper abdomen, and brain imaging. Patients undergoing resection of the lung plus chest wall were grouped as limited SST and those needing extensive resections (e.g., including the vertebral body) as extended SST. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to determine difference in survival. Multivariate Cox regression was used to identify prognostic factors.

Results

A total of 123 patients were identified with a median follow-up of 4.9 years (interquartile range: 1.6-8.9 y). The 90-day postoperative mortality and morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grades III-V) were 6.5% and 21.1%, respectively. Patients with a radical resection (R0: 92.7%) had better survival (p = 0.002), as did those who had major pathologic response (73%) (p = 0.001). Ten-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival were 48.1% and 42.6%, respectively. There were no differences in 90-day mortality (p = 0.31) and OS (p = 0.79) between extended SST and limited SST patients.

Conclusions

In patients with SST, trimodality resulted in a 10-year estimated OS and disease-free survival of 48.1% and 42.6%, respectively, which were improved after radical resection (R0) and major pathologic response. Survival for limited and extended resections was comparable, and distant relapse was the main pattern of failure. Better systemic treatments are therefore needed.

Surgical complications and clinical outcomes after dose-escalated trimodality therapy for non-small cell lung cancer in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Trimodality therapy (TMT) with preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgical resection is used for locally-advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). Traditionally, preoperative radiation doses ≤54 Gy are used due to concerns regarding excess morbidity, but little is known about outcomes and toxicities after TMT with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to higher doses.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients who received planned TMT with IMRT for LA-NSCLC at Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 2008 and 2017 was performed. Clinical and treatment characteristics, pathologic response, and surgical toxicity were assessed. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test was used for survival outcomes. Cox proportional-hazards regression was used for multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients received less than definitive doses of <60 Gy and 30 patients received definitive doses ≥60 Gy. Surgical outcomes, pathologic complete response, and postoperative toxicity did not differ significantly between the groups. With median follow-up of 3.6 years (range: 0.4-11.4), three-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (78.0% vs. 68.3%, p = 0.51) and overall survival (OS) (61.0% vs. 69.4%, p = 0.32) was not significantly different between patients receiving <60 Gy and ≥60 Gy, respectively. On multivariable analysis, older age, clinical stage, and length of hospital stay (LOS) >7 days were associated with OS.

CONCLUSIONS

With IMRT, there was no increased rate of surgical complications in patients receiving higher doses of radiation. Survival outcomes or LOS did not differ based on radiation dose, but increased LOS was associated with worse OS. Larger prospective studies are needed to further examine outcomes after IMRT in patients with LA-NSCLC receiving TMT.

Evaluation of prognostic factors in lung cancers with surgical complete response after induction treatment

Background

This study aims to evaluate long-term results of induction treatment and to investigate prognostic factors affecting survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients with a pathological complete response.

Methods

Between January 2010 and December 2017, a total of 39 patients (38 males, 1 female; mean age: 56.2±8.3 years; range, 38 to 77 years) having locally advanced (IIIA-IIIB) non-small cell lung cancer who were given induction treatment and underwent surgery after induction treatment and had a pathological complete response were retrospectively analyzed. Survival rates of the patients and prognostic factors of survival were analyzed.

Results

Clinical staging before induction treatment revealed Stage IIB, IIIA, and IIIB disease in three (7.7%), 26 (66.7%), and 10 (25.6%) patients, respectively. The five-year overall survival rate was 61.2%, and the disease-free survival rate was 55.1%. In nine (23.1%) patients, local and distant recurrences were detected in the postoperative period.

Conclusion

In patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer undergoing surgery after induction treatment, the rates of pathological complete response are at considerable levels. In these patients, the five-year overall survival is quite satisfactory and the most important prognostic factor affecting overall survival is the presence of single-station N2.

Lifestyle behaviors and intervention preferences of early-stage lung cancer survivors and their family caregivers

PURPOSE

Lung cancer (LC) is a highly prevalent disease with more survivors diagnosed and treated at earlier stages. There is a need to understand psychological and lifestyle behavior needs to design interventions for this population. Furthermore, understanding the needs and role of family caregivers, especially given the risks associated with second-hand smoke, is needed.

METHODS

Thirty-one early-stage (stages I or IIA) LC survivors of (52% men) and 22 (50% women) caregivers (N = 53 total) completed surveys after surgery (baseline) and at 3- and 6-month follow-ups. Participants reported on psychological functioning, smoking, and physical activity (PA) as well as intervention preferences.

RESULTS

Survivors reported low levels of psychological distress and 3% were current smokers during the study. Approximately 79% were sedentary and not meeting national PA guidelines. Caregivers also reported minimal psychological distress and were sedentary (62% not meeting guidelines), but a larger proportion continued to smoke following the survivor's cancer diagnosis (14%). Both survivors and caregivers expressed interest in home-based PA interventions but differed regarding preferred format for delivery. Most (64%) caregivers preferred a dyadic format, where survivors and caregivers participate in the intervention together. However, most survivors preferred an individual or group format (57%) for intervention delivery.

CONCLUSION

Both LC survivors and family caregivers could benefit from PA interventions, and flexible, dyadic interventions could additionally support smoking cessation for family caregivers.

Reirradiation for locoregionally recurrent non-small cell lung cancer

Locoregional failure in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains high, and the management for recurrent disease in the setting of prior radiotherapy is difficult. Retreatment options such as surgery or systemic therapy are typically limited or frequently result in suboptimal outcomes. Reirradiation (reRT) of thoracic malignancies may be an optimal strategy for providing definitive local control and offering a new chance of cure. Yet, retreatment with radiation therapy can be challenging for fear of excessive toxicities and the inability to safely deliver definitive (≥60 Gy) doses of reRT. However, with recent improvements in radiation delivery techniques and image-guidance, dose-escalation with reRT is possible and outcomes are encouraging. Here, we present a review of various radiation techniques, clinical outcomes and associated toxicities in patients with locoregionally recurrent NSCLC treated primarily with reRT.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus upfront surgery in non-metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

The favorable effect of postoperative chemotherapy on long-term survival has been well acknowledged in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), while the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains obscure. This meta-analysis enrolling high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed at comparing NAC followed by surgery with upfront surgery (US) in efficacy and safety among non-metastatic NSCLC patients.

Materials and Methods

Relevant literatures were searched systematically from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. We also screened references of relevant publications and conference proceedings. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), 3-year and 5-year survival rates, mortality, and recurrence. Secondary outcomes included tumor-free (R0) resection rates, response rate, and postoperative complications. Subgroup analysis according to ethnicity was further conducted.

Results

A total of 11 eligible RCTs comparing NAC (n = 1624) with US (n = 1639) and published from 1998 to 2013 were included. Compared to US, NAC contributed to longer OS and DFS, higher 3-year and 5-year DFS rates, and lower incidences of total mortality, overall recurrence and metastasis, and tended to cause higher 5-year OS rates. NAC was associated with reduced risks in recurrence compared to US. Patients receiving NAC had lower surgery and resection rates, but higher R0 resection incidence among resected cases. NAC especially benefited occident patients. The overall NAC response rate was 52.1%, and NAC-related toxicity rate was 58.3%.

Conclusion

NAC may provide better survival, reduced recurrence, and improved R0 resection rates among NSCLC patients who had surgery, especially in occident patients. Further studies are needed to clarify the ethnic differences.

Oncological outcomes from trimodality therapy receiving definitive doses of neoadjuvant chemoradiation (≥60 Gy) and factors influencing consideration for surgery in stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose

Guidelines for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) recommend definitive chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for cN2-N3 disease, reserving surgery for patients with minimal nodal involvement at presentation. The current literature suggests that surgery after CRT for stage III NSCLC can improve freedom-from-recurrence (FFR) but has not consistently demonstrated an improvement in overall survival, perhaps partly due to the low (45-50.4 Gy) preoperative doses delivered that result in low rates of mediastinal nodal clearance. We therefore analyzed factors associated with trimodality therapy receipt and determined outcomes in patients with LA-NSCLC who were treated with definitive doses (≥60 Gy) of neoadjuvant CRT prior to surgery.

Methods and materials

We retrospectively analyzed 355 consecutive patients with LA-NSCLC who were treated with curative intent between January 2000 and December 2013. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the overall survival and FFR of patients who were initially planned to receive trimodality treatment but never underwent surgery (unplanned bimodality) compared with those who were never considered to be surgical candidates (planned bimodality) and those who underwent surgical resection after CRT (trimodality). Cox proportional hazards regression with forward selection was used for multivariate analyses, and the Fisher exact test was used to test contingency tables.

Results

Patients who received trimodality therapy had a longer median survival than those with unplanned or planned bimodality therapy at 59.9, 20.1, and 17.3 months, respectively (P < .001). The survival benefit with surgery persisted in patients with stage IIIB (P < .001) and N3 (P = .010) nodal disease when mediastinal nodal clearance was achieved. FFR was also improved with surgical resection (P = .001). Race (P < .001), stage (P < .001), performance status (P < .001), age (P < .001), and diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = .009) were significant indicators that influenced both the decision to initially choose trimodality therapy at consultation and to actually perform surgical resection.

Conclusions

Trimodality treatment significantly improves survival and FFR in patients with LA-NSCLC when definitive doses of radiation with neoadjuvant chemotherapy are employed. We identified important demographic features that predict the use of surgical intervention in patients with stage III NSCLC.

Adjuvant chemotherapy plus radiotherapy is superior to chemotherapy following surgical treatment of stage IIIA N2 non-small-cell lung cancer

The use of additional radiotherapy for resected stage IIIA N2 non-small-cell lung cancer in the setting of standard adjuvant chemotherapy remains controversial. A comprehensive search (last search updated in March 2015) for relevant studies comparing patients with stage IIIA N2 non-small-cell lung cancer undergoing resection after treatment with adjuvant postoperative chemotherapy alone or adjuvant postoperative chemoradiotherapy (POCRT) was conducted. Hazard ratios (HRs) were extracted from these studies to give pooled estimates of the effects of POCRT on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Six studies were included. The meta-analysis demonstrated that POCRT had a greater OS benefit than postoperative chemotherapy (HR =0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79-0.96, P=0.006). Unfortunately, there was no significant difference in DFS between the two groups: the combined HR for DFS was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.57-1.46, P=0.706). In a subgroup analysis of two randomized controlled trials (n=172 patients), adding radiation was of no benefit to either OS (HR =0.72, 95% CI: 0.49-1.06, P=0.094) or DFS (HR =1.45, 95% CI: 1.00-2.09, P=0.047). In summary, compared with postoperative chemotherapy, POCRT was beneficial to OS but not DFS in patients with stage IIIA N2 non-small-cell lung cancer.

The long-term outcomes of induction chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Although the concept of induction therapy followed by surgical resection for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) has found general acceptance, the appropriate indications and the strategy for this treatment are still controversial.

Methods

From 2000 through 2008, 36 patients received concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. We retrospectively reviewed these cases, analyzed the outcomes and examined the prognosis.

Results

The median radiation dose given was 60 Gy. Chemotherapy included a platinum agent in all cases; cisplatin-based chemotherapy was administered to 9 cases, and a carboplatin-based chemotherapy regimen was administered to 27. A complete resection was performed in 94% of the patients. Seventeen (47.2%) patients exhibited a complete pathological response, and downstaging was induced in 26 (72%) cases. The morbidity and 30-day mortality rates were 11.1 and 0%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rate in the patients with complete resection (n = 33) was 83.3%.

Conclusions

Induction chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for LA-NSCLC provided a favorable prognosis for selected patients. A complete pathological response was found in about half of cases. This strategy is feasible and was associated with low morbidity and high resectability rates, suggesting that it contributed to improving the treatment results.

Outcomes and prognostic factors of non-small-cell lung cancer with lymph node involvement treated with induction treatment and surgical resection

OBJECTIVES

Induction therapy (IT) has gained popularity in recent years, becoming a standard of treatment in resectable lymph node-positive NSCLC. IT aims to downstage the disease (shrinkage of tumour and clearance of lymph node-metastases), clear distant micrometastases and prolong survival. Potential disadvantages are increased morbidity and/or mortality after surgery and risk of progression of disease that could have been initially resected. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes and prognostic factors in a series of patients with lymph node-positive NSCLC receiving IT followed by surgery.

METHODS

A total of 86 patients (75.6% males, median age 63 years) affected by NSCLC in clinical stage IIIA (n = 80) or IIIB (n = 6), with pathologically proven lymph node involvement, underwent platinum-based IT followed by surgery between 2000 and 2009.

RESULTS

Eighty (93%) patients received a median of 3 cycles of chemotherapy, and 6 (7%) underwent induction chemoradiotherapy. Response to IT was complete in 3.5%, partial in 59.3% and stable disease in 37.2% of patients. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were 25.6 and 2.3%, respectively. At pathological evaluation, 38.4% of patients had a downstaging of disease with a complete lymph node clearance in 31.4%. Median overall survival was 23 months (5-year survival 33%). Univariate analysis found clinical stage (P = 0.02), histology (P = 0.01), response to IT (P = 0.02) and type of intervention (P = 0.047) to have predictive roles in survival. A better but not significant survival was also found for pN0 vs pN+ (P = 0.22), downstaged tumours (P = 0.08) and left side (P = 0.06). On multivariate analysis, clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy (P = 0.01) and age (P = 0.03) were the only independent predictors of survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of IT for lymph node-positive NSCLC seems justified by low morbidity and/or mortality and good survival rates. Patients with response to IT showed greater benefit in the long term.

Surgery in 2013 and beyond

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer related mortality. The role of surgery continues to evolve and in the last ten years there have been a number of significant changes in the surgical management of lung cancer. These changes extend across the entire surgical spectrum of lung cancer management including diagnosis, staging, treatment and pathology. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scanning and ultrasound (EBUS) have redefined traditional staging paradigms, and surgical techniques, including video-assisted thoracoscopy (VATS), robotic surgery and uniportal surgery, are now accepted as standard of care in many centers. The changing pathology of lung cancer, with more peripheral tumours and an increase in adenocarcinomas has important implications for the Thoracic surgeon. Screening, using Low-Dose CT scanning, is having an impact, with not only a higher percentage of lower stage cancers detected, but also redefining the role of sublobar resection. The incidence of pneumonectomy has reduced as have the rates of "exploratory thoracotomy". In general, lung resection is considered for stage I and II patients with a selected role in more advanced stage disease as part of a multimodality approach. This paper will look at these issues and how they impact on Thoracic Surgical practice in 2013 and beyond.

Evaluation of arm function and quality of life after trimodality treatment for superior sulcus tumours

OBJECTIVES

Following trimodality treatment for superior sulcus tumours (SSTs), the 5-year survival rate has significantly improved. Quality of life and potential negative effects of this strategy have become more important. The objective of this study was to investigate the quality of life and the arm and shoulder function after the resection of superior sulcus tumours following neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

METHODS

Patients were selected from a thoracic surgery database. Between January 2002 and December 2010, 72 patients received trimodality treatment of whom 39 were alive at the start of this study in 2010. The following arm function tests were used: nine-hole peg test, range of motion test and action research arm test. Quality of life was assessed using the Disability of the arm and shoulder and SF-36 questionnaires. Analyses of the arm function were conducted comparing the treated side with the untreated side. For quality of life, patients treated on their dominant side were compared with those treated on their non-dominant side.

RESULTS

In total, 19 patients participated in this study (15 men and 4 women). The median age was 59 years (range 39-73), median radiation dose 50 Gy (range 39-66) and median follow-up 40 months (range 4-101). There was no statistically significant difference in arm and shoulder function between the treated and the untreated arm. However, statistically significantly less pain was found if patients were treated on their dominant side.

CONCLUSIONS

After the resection of SSTs following chemoradiotherapy, the arm and shoulder function on the affected side is comparable with the functions at the contralateral side. Patients treated for an SST on their dominant side are less affected in their quality of life regarding pain compared with those treated on their non-dominant side.

Prognostic factors of resected node-positive lung cancer: location, extent of nodal metastases, and multimodal treatment

Objective: To investigate the prognostic significance of location and extent of lymph node metastasis in resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and to weigh up the influence of treatment modalities on survival.

Patients and method: On exploratory analysis, patients were grouped according to location and time of diagnosis of nodal metastasis: group I, pN2-disease in the aortopulmonary region (N=14); group II, pN2-disease at other level (N=30); group III, cN2-disease with response to induction treatment (ypN0; N=21); group IV, cN2-disease without response to induction treatment (ypN1-2; N=27); group V, pN1-disease (N=66).

Results: From 1999 to 2005, 158 patients (median age: 64 years) with node-positive NSCLC were treated at our institution either by neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy plus surgery or by surgery plus adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or both). Operative mortality and major morbidity rates were 2% and 15%. Five-year survival rates were 19% for group I, 12% for group II, 66% for group III, 15% for group IV, and 29% for group V (P<.05). On multivariate analysis, time of N+-diagnosis, extent of nodal involvement and therapy approach were significantly linked to prognosis.

Conclusion: The survival of patients with node-positive NSCLC does not depend on anatomical location of nodal disease, but strongly correlates to extent of nodal metastases and treatment modality. Combined therapy approaches including chemotherapy and surgery may improve long-term survival.

Role of surgery for stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer

Perhaps no topic other than stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer management is as controversial among surgeons, radiologists and medical oncologists. Much of the debate relates to the choice between surgical resection and radiation as the local control modality. Although limited, available evidence from randomized controlled trails raised concerns about the role of surgical resection. However, there is no perfect study, and the results should not be over-interpreted. This mini review will scrutinize these trials, focusing on the study design, results and, most importantly, limitations, and will explore the possible role of surgery for stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer.

Gemcitabine combined with cisplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer

This single-arm, multicenter, phase II study examined the objective response rate and toxicity after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer. Treatment consisted of three 21-day cycles of gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)) on day 1 of each cycle. Surgery was performed 4-5 weeks after day 1 of the last cycle of study therapy. A total of 52 patients from five investigative sites in Russia were enrolled in the study, of which 50 (96.2%) received study therapy. Of the 49 patients who were evaluable for response, six (12.2%) had a complete response and 16 (32.7%) had a partial response, resulting in an overall response rate of 44.9%. Disease progression occurred in four out of the 49 (8.2%) patients. Radical tumor resection was performed in 38 out of the 49 (77.6%) patients. A total of 41 patients were assessed for a pathological complete response, of which four (9.8%) patients had pathological complete tumor regression. Postsurgical restaging was performed in 36 out of the 41 (87.8%) patients. Tumor downstaging occurred in 16 out of the 36 (44.4%) patients. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were experienced by 28.0%/6.0% patients and 6.0%/2.0% patients, respectively. Grade 3 anemia occurred in 4.0% of the patients. Nonhematological toxicity was mild. Overall mortality was 30.0% (15 out of 50 patients), predominantly from progressive disease. The 1-year overall survival rate was 74.4% (95% confidence interval: 61.3-87.6%). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin showed a good safety profile with an encouraging possibility of curative surgery in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Results of trimodality therapy in patients with stage IIIA (N2-bulky) and stage IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The survival rates for stage IIIA and stage IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are extremely poor with single-treatment modalities such as radiation therapy or surgery. The purpose of this study is to assess tolerability, response, surgical resectability, and survival of chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation therapy, and then followed by surgery in patients with stage IIIA (N2-bulky) or stage IIIB NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-eight patients with stage IIIA (N2-bulky) or stage IIIB (T4 N1-2 M0) NSCLC received 2 cycles of chemotherapy with cisplatin, mitomycin, and vindesine, subsequent radiation therapy (45 Gy, twice-daily 1.5 Gy) with simultaneous low-dose cisplatin and vindesine, followed by surgery.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients completed induction chemoradiation therapy. Thirty-three patients (68.8%) had clinical response to induction treatment. Thirty-nine patients underwent a thoracotomy, with a complete resection rate of 62.5% (30/48). The pathologic response rate was 60% (27/45), with complete pathologic response of 8 patients. The median survival time for the total group of 48 patients was 23 months, with 3- and 5-year survival rates of 41.7% and 31.8%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that complete resection and pathologic response in surgical specimens were independent predictors of survival (P=.048 and P=.022).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative sequence of chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation therapy is an effective approach in patients with stage IIIA (N2-bulky) and IIIB (T4 N1-2 M0) NSCLC. The operation after induction chemoradiation therapy should be performed in carefully selected patients with surgically resectable diseases. The patients who achieved complete resection and with pathologic response of tumor can benefit from surgery following induction chemoradiation therapy.

Which patients should be operated on after induction chemotherapy for N2 non-small cell lung cancer? Analysis of a 7-year experience in 175 patients

OBJECTIVE

The role of surgery in patients with N2 non-small cell lung cancer is debated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of surgical resection after induction chemotherapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the cases of patients with N2 non-small cell lung cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by resection between 2001 and 2007. They all had tumors deemed resectable.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-five patients entered the study. Most of them received 2 or 3 cycles of chemotherapy (81%), in all cases platinum-based regimens. Chemotherapy response rate was 62%. Operations included 96 lobectomies/bilobectomies and 79 pneumonectomies. Complete resection rate was 94%, and perioperative mortality was 4.5%. A pathologic mediastinal downstaging was found in 39% of patients. Overall median survival time and 5-year survival were 34.7 months and 30%, respectively. Survival was affected by clinical response (median survival time 51 months and 5-year survival 42% for responders versus 19 months and 10% for nonresponders) and by nodal downstaging (51 months and 45% versus 25% and 22%). In the group of responders, nondownstaged patients showed satisfying survival (median survival time 30 months, 5-year survival 30%). In the group of nonresponders, survival was unsatisfactory when a lobectomy was performed (median survival time 20 months, 5-year survival 13%) and poor in case of pneumonectomy (15 months and 6%). Multivariate analysis found 4 factors significantly affecting survival: clinical response, nodal downstaging, number of chemotherapy cycles, and histopathologic response.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery after chemotherapy could be effective for selected patients with N2 non-small cell lung cancer. Survival for responders is satisfactory, even in case of persistent N2 disease. Prognosis for nonresponders is disappointing.

Phase II Trial of a Trimodality Regimen for Stage III Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Using Chemotherapy As Induction Treatment With Concurrent Hyperfractionated Chemoradiation With Carboplatin and Paclitaxel Followed by Subsequent Resection: A Single-Center Study

Purpose

We started a phase II trial of induction chemotherapy and concurrent hyperfractionated chemoradiotherapy followed by either surgery or boost chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced, stage III disease. The purpose is to achieve better survival in the surgery group with minimum morbidity and mortality.

Patients and Methods

Patients treated from 1998 to 2002 with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgical resection for stage III NSCLC were analyzed. The treatment consisted of four cycles of induction chemotherapy with carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by chemoradiotherapy with a reduced dose of carboplatin/paclitaxel and accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy with 1.5 Gy twice daily up to 45 Gy. After restaging, operable patients underwent thoracotomy. Inoperable patients received chemoradiotherapy up to 63 Gy. Study end points included resectability, pathologic response, and survival.

Results

One hundred twenty patients were enrolled; 25% patients had stage IIIA, 73% had stage IIIB, and 2% stage IV. After treatment, 47.5% had downstaging, 29.2% had stable disease, and 23.3% had progressive disease. Thirty patients (25%) were not eligible for operation because of progressive disease, stable disease, and/or functional deterioration with one treatment-related death. The 30-day mortality was 5% in patients who underwent operation. The 5-year survival rate for 120 patients was 21.7%, and it was 43.1% in patients with complete resection. In postoperative patients with stage N0 disease, 5-year survival was 53.3%; if stage N2 or N3 disease was still present, 5-year survival was 33.3%.

Conclusion

Staging and treatment with chemoradiotherapy and complete resection performed in experienced centers achieve acceptable morbidity and mortality.

Prognostic factors and long term results of neo adjuvant therapy followed by surgery in stage IIIA N2 non-small cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Prognosis of stage IIIA N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains poor despite the changes in therapeutic strategies.

OBJECTIVES

To assess long term results of neo adjuvant therapy followed by surgery for patients with stage IIIA N2 NSCLC and to analyze factors influencing survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The methods adopted include: Retrospective review of medical records of 91 patients with stage IIIA N2 NSCLC, who received neo adjuvant therapy followed by surgery; collection of information on demographic information, staging procedure, preoperative therapy, clinical response, type of resection, pathologic response of tumor, status of lymph nodes and adjuvant chemotherapy; survival analysis by Kaplan-Meier and calculation of prognostic factors using log-rank and Cox regression model.

RESULTS

All patients received a platinum-based chemotherapy and 23 (29.1%) had an associated radiotherapy. Eighty four patients underwent thoracotomy. Median survival was 26 months (95%CI, 22.6-30.8 months) with three and five year survival rates of 31.6 and 20.9%, respectively. Prognostic factors for survival on univariate analysis was clinical response (P = 0.032), complete resection (P = 0.002), pathologic tumor response ( P < 0.001), and lymph nodal down staging (P = 0.001). Multivariate analyses identified complete resection, pathologic tumor response and lymph nodal down staging as independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

Survival of patients with stage IIIA N2 NSCLC who received neo adjuvant therapy is significantly influenced by clinical response, complete resection, pathologic tumor response, and lymph nodal down staging. These results can be helpful in guiding standard clinical practice and evaluating the outcome of neo adjuvant therapy followed by surgery in patients with stage IIIA N2 NSCLC.

Radiotherapy plus chemotherapy with or without surgical resection for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Results from phase II studies in patients with stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer with ipsilateral mediastinal nodal metastases (N2) have shown the feasibility of resection after concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy with promising rates of survival. We therefore did this phase III trial to compare concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy followed by resection with standard concurrent chemotherapy and definitive radiotherapy without resection.

METHODS

Patients with stage T1-3pN2M0 non-small-cell lung cancer were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to concurrent induction chemotherapy (two cycles of cisplatin [50 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 29, and 36] and etoposide [50 mg/m(2) on days 1-5 and 29-33]) plus radiotherapy (45 Gy) in multiple academic and community hospitals. If no progression, patients in group 1 underwent resection and those in group 2 continued radiotherapy uninterrupted up to 61 Gy. Two additional cycles of cisplatin and etoposide were given in both groups. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00002550.

FINDINGS

202 patients (median age 59 years, range 31-77) were assigned to group 1 and 194 (61 years, 32-78) to group 2. Median OS was 23.6 months (IQR 9.0-not reached) in group 1 versus 22.2 months (9.4-52.7) in group 2 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.87 [0.70-1.10]; p=0.24). Number of patients alive at 5 years was 37 (point estimate 27%) in group 1 and 24 (point estimate 20%) in group 2 (odds ratio 0.63 [0.36-1.10]; p=0.10). With N0 status at thoracotomy, the median OS was 34.4 months (IQR 15.7-not reached; 19 [point estimate 41%] patients alive at 5 years). Progression-free survival (PFS) was better in group 1 than in group 2, median 12.8 months (5.3-42.2) vs 10.5 months (4.8-20.6), HR 0.77 [0.62-0.96]; p=0.017); the number of patients without disease progression at 5 years was 32 (point estimate 22%) versus 13 (point estimate 11%), respectively. Neutropenia and oesophagitis were the main grade 3 or 4 toxicities associated with chemotherapy plus radiotherapy in group 1 (77 [38%] and 20 [10%], respectively) and group 2 (80 [41%] and 44 [23%], respectively). In group 1, 16 (8%) deaths were treatment related versus four (2%) in group 2. In an exploratory analysis, OS was improved for patients who underwent lobectomy, but not pneumonectomy, versus chemotherapy plus radiotherapy.

INTERPRETATION

Chemotherapy plus radiotherapy with or without resection (preferably lobectomy) are options for patients with stage IIIA(N2) non-small-cell lung cancer.

FUNDING

National Cancer Institute, Canadian Cancer Society, and National Cancer Institute of Canada.

What is the optimal treatment of stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer after EORTC 08941?

The results of a randomized trial investigating the role of local therapies after induction chemotherapy in patients with stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer lend themselves to a review of the available evidence and speculation about the routine and future treatment in these patients. An algorithm for future treatment is proposed.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in potentially resectable stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has become standard of treatment in the last years. Two randomised pioneer phase III trials conducted with second generation platinum combinations had demonstrated an advantage in survival of induction chemotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone. Subsequently, a wide number of phase II studies with third generation platinum-based doublets or triplets have increased the evidence of the activity as well as the good tolerability of this approach. Nowadays, the main topics of ongoing clinical research are to assess the role of induction chemotherapy in early stage disease, and the role of induction radiotherapy, as well as definite chemo-radiotherapy in stage IIIA NSCLC. This report review these issues and focuses on current treatment options for resectable stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC.

Induction chemotherapy with the TIP regimen (paclitaxel/ifosfamide/cisplatin) in stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Induction chemotherapy may improve clinical outcome of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To further pursue this, the Austrian Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (AASLC) performed a multi-center phase II trial with TIP induction chemotherapy (Taxol 175 mg/m2 over 3h on day 1, ifosfamide 1000 mg/m2 daily on days 1-3, cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1, and prophylactic filgrastim 5 microg/kg daily on days 4-13). Treatment cycles were repeated every 3 weeks for 3 cycles. Then patients were re-staged and selected for local treatment. Forty-seven patients (33 male, 14 female; median age 58 years, range 36-78; 22 cIIIA, 25 cIIIB; 26 adenocarcinomas, 14 squamous cell carcinomas, 4 large cell carcinomas, 3 undifferentiated carcinomas) were included in this trial. Forty-five patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. An overall response rate of 43% (complete remission 4.5% and partial remission 38%) was achieved. Stable disease and progressive disease were seen in 38 and 15% of the patients, respectively. Down-staging occurred in 36% of the patients. The toxicities of the chemotherapy were mild and, in particular, no severe hematotoxicity was observed. Surgery was performed in 24 (51%) patients and resulted in complete tumor resection in 19 patients. Twenty-four patients received thoracic radiotherapy, 10 patients after surgery. Median survival was 10.3 months for the total population, 13.5 months for patients with cIIIA and 10 months for patients with clinical cIIIB. Survival was longer for patients with down-staging as compared to those without (median not reached versus 10 months, p=0.005) and for patients with complete tumor resection as compared to the remaining patients (27 months versus 10 months, p=0.05). In conclusion, the TIP regimen shows activity and good tolerance as induction chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced NSCLC.

Chemotherapy is the cornerstone of the combined surgical treatment of lung cancer with synchronous brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer accounts for about 50% of brain metastases, of which nearly 25% are eligible for neurosurgery, providing a neurological control rate of up to 70% when followed by whole brain radiation therapy. How to manage the primary lung carcinoma remains elusive.

METHODS

We undertook a retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection for synchronous brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer in a single institution, to determine overall survival and prognostic factors, with particular attention to the treatment of the primary lung tumor.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients underwent surgical resection of synchronous brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer. Median survival was 13.2 months. Prognosis mainly depended of the treatment of the lung tumor, with a marked survival advantage in the 29 patients receiving a focal treatment (thoracic surgery or radiotherapy), compared to the 22 other patients: median, 1-year, and 2-year survival were 22.5 months, 69%, and 42%, versus 7.1 months, 33%, and 5%, respectively (p<0.001); response to pre-operative chemotherapy before focal treatment was the main favorable prognostic factor (p=0.023), and further identified patients who had benefit from resection of the lung tumor, with a significantly better outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy, by its therapeutic and prognostic value, may be considered as the cornerstone of the combined medical and surgical therapeutic sequence whereby brain metastasectomy is followed by chemotherapy and further focal treatment of the primary lung tumor in responders to chemotherapy.

Chemoradiation paradigm for the treatment of lung cancer

For the treatment of locoregional advanced stage III non-small-cell lung cancer, when chemotherapy is added sequentially to radiotherapy it acts systemically and is aimed at reducing distant metastases. Concurrent chemotherapy and radiation, however, is intended to enhance the locoregional efficacy of this modality. Combined effects of these modalities are based on their different toxicity profiles, leading to a reduced toxicity : efficacy ratio of the combination. Controlled trials investigating this additive approach indicate that concurrent application of chemotherapy and radiotherapy results in a small but significant benefit for locoregional control, which translates into a small but measurable survival benefit. This benefit is most evident when looking at 3-year or 5-year overall survival rates, when it is of clinical significance. The use of single-agent cisplatin has already demonstrated major radiosensitizing effects whereas the radiosensitizing properties of concurrent application of the single-agent carboplatin have not been observed in controlled trials. Newer drugs such as vinorelbine, the taxanes and gemcitabine might enhance this effect, although no improvement has been observed in randomized controlled trials comparing such regimens with single-agent cisplatin. New 'targeted' agents might synergize with ionizing irradiation and provide an interesting rationale concerning combined modality therapy, but this hypothesis awaits prospective clinical evidence from randomized controlled trials.

Prognostic relevance of response evaluation using [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of (early) response measurements using [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (18FDG PET) with respect to survival of patients with stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing induction chemotherapy (IC), with a comparative analysis of PET methods.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a prospective multicenter study, PET was performed in patients before IC and after one and three cycles. Computed tomography (CT) was performed before and after IC. Glucose consumption (metabolic rate of glucose [MRglu]) was measured using Patlak graphical analysis and correlated with simplified methods. Mediastinal lymph node (MLN) status was assessed visually. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to determine the prognostic relevance of CT and PET measures of response with respect to survival.

RESULTS

Complete PET data sets were available in 47 patients. Median survival was 21 months. MLN status after IC by PET predicted survival (hazard ratio [HR], 2.33; 95% CI, 1.04 to 5.22; P = .04) in contrast with CT (HR, 1.87; 95% CI, 0.81 to 4.30; P = .14). Residual MRglu after IC proved to be the best prognostic factor (HR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.28 to 2.97; P = .002). Multivariate stepwise analysis showed that PET identified prognostically different strata in patients considered responsive according to CT. Residual MRglu after one cycle selected patients with different outcomes (HR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.18 to 3.52; P = .01). Simplified quantitative 18FDG PET methods were correlated with Patlak graphical analysis during and after therapy (r > or = 0.90).

CONCLUSION

18FDG PET has additional value over CT in monitoring response to IC in patients with stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC, and it seems feasible to predict survival early during IC. Simple semiquantitative and complex PET methods perform equally well.

Thin-section multiplanar reformats from multidetector-row CT data: Utility for assessment of regional tumor extent in non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the clinical utility of thin-section multiplanar reformats (MPRs) from multidetector-row CT (MDCT) data sets for assessing the extent of regional tumors in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty consecutive NSCLC patients, who were considered candidates for surgical treatment, underwent contrast-enhanced MDCT examinations, surgical resection and pathological examinations. All MDCT examinations were performed with a 4-detector row computed tomography (CT). From each raw CT data set, 5mm section thickness CT images (routine CT), 1.25 mm section thickness CT images (thin-section CT) and 1.25 mm section thickness sagittal (thin-section sagittal MPR) and coronal images (thin-section coronal MPR) were reconstructed. A 4-point visual score was used to assess mediastinal, interlobar and chest wall invasions on each image set. For assessment of utility in routine clinical practice, mean reading times for each image set were compared by means of Fisher's protected least significant difference (PLSD) test. A receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the diagnostic capability of each of the image data sets. Finally, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the reconstructed images were compared by McNemar test.

RESULTS

Mean reading times for thin-section sagittal and coronal MPRs were significantly shorter than those for routine CT and thin-section CT (p<0.05). Areas under the curve (Azs) showing interlobar invasion on thin-section sagittal and coronal MPRs were significantly larger than that on routine CT (p=0.03), and the Az on thin-section sagittal MPR was also significantly larger than that on routine CT (p=0.02). Accuracy of chest wall invasion by thin-section sagittal MPR was significantly higher than that by routine CT (p=0.04).

CONCLUSION

Thin-section multiplanar reformats from multidetector-row CT data sets are useful for assessing the extent of regional tumors in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Controversial Issues Regarding the Use of Induction Chemotherapy for Lung Cancer

Induction chemotherapy has been proven to improve survival in patients with Stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer, and is under investigation for early stage disease. Controversy still exists regarding the choice of chemotherapy regimens, patient selection, and inclusion of radiation therapy.

Multimodality Therapy for Stage III Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

The treatment of stage III non–small-cell lung cancer has evolved over the last two decades, with combined-modality therapy the current standard of care. As a result, intermediate and long-term survival has improved for patients in this common stage category, compared to the poor outcomes achieved with the historical standard of once-daily radiation therapy alone. This review summarizes two decades of clinical research regarding bimodality and trimodality approaches for the heterogenous stage subsets within the stage III designation, discusses the rationale and status of prophylactic brain irradiation, and concludes with perspectives on progress and future directions. Chemotherapy plus radiotherapy given concurrently is the optimal treatment for the group of patients with advanced stage III disease. The potential role of a surgical resection following chemotherapy (with or without radiation) in this setting is still controversial. The only subsets for which trimodality treatments are clearly preferred include T4N0-1 disease and superior sulcus tumors. The other major stage III subgroup has a minimal disease burden with low tumor volume and/or microscopic N2 disease, thus technically could undergo a surgical resection upfront. Induction chemotherapy before surgery may yield a survival advantage, although the phase III trials in this area are not conclusive. Given the marked survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery in even earlier stages of non–small-cell lung cancer, the proper sequence of surgery and chemotherapy (before v after surgery) remains an important unresolved question in this subgroup. Furthermore, how to incorporate radiation therapy, as well as whether it should be given at all in this subset of patients, are other important issues actively under study in ongoing trials.

Le traitement chirurgical du cancer bronchique non à petites cellules

INTRODUCTION

Surgery remains the best option for curative treatment of early stages Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this article we review the current status and future perspectives of surgical treatment of NSCLC.

STATE OF ART

An important part of the surgical procedure is the final determination of the staging with evaluation of the resectability of the tumor and its nodal status. This requires a systematic hilar and mediastinal nodal dissection and a complete resection that remains a major prognostic factor.

PERSPECTIVES

In order to preserve pulmonary function, lobectomies with the use of broncho- or arterioplasty have been developed with reduction in the number of pneumonectomies. For peripheral T1N0 NSCLC, video-assisted (VATS) lobectomy has become technically feasible with survival, in non-randomised studies, at least as good as the survival after open resection. While VATS has a clear role in staging of lung cancer, its role in the treatment of lung cancer however remains debatable. In case of involved mediastinal nodes (N2 disease) induction therapy is given in many centers and patients with mediastinal downstaging have a significantly better survival than non-responders. Restaging of the mediastinum is at the moment far from accurate. In case of locally advanced tumour (cT4), new surgical techniques and approaches make resection of carina, vena cava superior, vertebrae feasible with acceptable morbidity and mortality but additional studies are required.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery remains the treatment of choice for curative treatment of NSCLC. The evolution of surgical techniques and the use of multimodality treatment further improve the results of surgical management. Rigorous patient selection, meticulous surgical technique and adequate peri- and postoperative management can keep operative morbidity and morbidity acceptable.