62 Phase II study of paclitaxel (Taxol®) and cisplatin (CDDP) in advanced pleural malignant mesothelioma (MM)

Malignant mesothelioma

Clinical trials investigating new trends in the treatment of stage I and II malignant mesothelioma have shown both intra-pleural immunotherapy and systemic chemo-immunotherapy to be efficacious. Intra-pleural gamma-interferon (gamma-IFN) therapy was associated with tolerable toxicity and an overall response (ORR) rate of 19%, while treatment with intra-pleural recombinant interleukin-2 (IL-2) was more toxic, but yielded an ORR of 47% in phase I trial and 55% in a phase II study. The association of intravenous cisplatin and subcutaneous alpha-interferon (alpha-IFN) was also associated with an encouraging ORR of 40% and a median survival of 12 months. Treatment with cisplatin, alpha-IFN and mitomycin C was associated with moderate toxicity and an ORR of 21% and a median survival of 12 months. The association of cisplatin, alpha-IFN and IL-2 was, however, extremely toxic and resulted in an ORR of 15%. The majority of patients responding to intra-pleural immunotherapy and systemic chemo-immunotherapy had epithelial type mesothelioma. The most encouraging results obtained from trials investigating systemic chemotherapy were following treatment with cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, mitomycin C and etoposide, where an ORR of 38% and an overall median survival rate of 16 months were achieved. Toxicity was mainly haematological and tolerable.

Enhanced effectiveness of last generation antiblastic compounds vs. cisplatin on malignant pleural mesothelioma cell lines

The purpose of this study was to examine the antiproliferative potentialities of a pool of new generation compounds (Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, Gemcitabine, Topotecan, SN-38) together with fenretinide, a synthetic derivative of retinoic acid, in comparison with the current first choice treatment cisplatin molecule, on a pool of human malignant pleural mesothelioma cell lines derived from either bioptic and pleural effusions samples. To evaluate the chemosensitivity features of malignant mesothelioma cells in vitro, we resorted to a rapid and reproducible colorimetric assay, a useful widely recognized tool for preclinical drug screening. In addition, by DNA content analysis and cellular morphologic assessment, we focused on the apoptosis as a potential mechanism of drug activity. The main results clearly indicate that, in all the models of malignant mesothelioma we handled in vitro, each tested antineoplastic agent is more powerful than cisplatin in inhibiting cell proliferation. Moreover, on experimental evidences basis, we can assume that the cytotoxic activity of tested compounds could be related, at least partially, to the drug-induced programmed cell death. This experimental study gives substance to the expected pharmacologic worth of the second generation antineoplastic drugs even if, in order to afford the most satisfactory biopharmacological approach, allowing to bypass the refractoriness to chemotherapy of this highly lethal tumour, further investigations at preclinical level are required.

Clinical and immunological assessment of Mycobacterium vaccae (SRL172) with chemotherapy in patients with malignant mesothelioma

The objectives of this study were to determine the toxicity of intratumoural/intrapleural SRL172 in addition to intradermal SRL172 and standard chemotherapy (mitomycin-C, vinblastine and cisplatin) in patients with malignant mesothelioma. Patients received chemotherapy (mitomycin-C: 8 mg m(-2), vinblastine: 6 mg m(-2), cisplatin 50 mg m(-2)) on a 3-weekly basis for up to six courses. IP SRL172 injections were given 3-weekly prior to chemotherapy and escalated in groups of three patients from 1 microg to 1 mg bacilli in 10-fold increments. Patients were also given ID SRL172 at a dose of 1 mg bacilli 4-weekly. Patients were assessed for toxicity after each course of chemotherapy and for response by CT imaging. Immuno-haematological parameters were analyzed pre-treatment and 1 month after completion of treatment. There was no dose limiting toxicity with IP SRL172 although there was greater toxicity at the highest dose (n=13). There were six out of 16 partial responses (37.5%). Haemato-immunological parameters, measured in seven patients pre and post-therapy, revealed that response rate correlated with a decrease in platelet count and there was an increase in activation of natural killer cells and a decrease in the percentage of IL-4 producing T cells in all tested patients post-treatment. SRL172 can be given safely into tumour deposits and the pleural cavity in patients with malignant mesothelioma and we have established the dose for phase II testing.

The emerging role of antifolates in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma

Clinicians have long regarded malignant pleural mesothelioma as a chemoresistant neoplasm and as a result no standard chemotherapy regimen has emerged. Antifolates such as methotrexate are among the most active compounds in mesothelioma, albeit based only on phase II data. Recently two antifolate-based combinations with apparently higher efficacy than older regimens have emerged: the pemetrexed/cisplatin regimen and the raltitrexed/oxaliplatin regimen. In two phase I trials with pemetrexed combined with either cisplatin or carboplatin responses occurred in five of 11 and nine of 29 patients, respectively. In a phase I trial of raltitrexed/oxaliplatin, six of 17 patients (35%) with mesothelioma achieved a partial response. In a phase II trial of raltitrexed/oxaliplatin, 14 objective responses were confirmed in 72 patients (25%) with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Indeed, responses were seen in cisplatin-refractory patients. Based on the promising results from these combination trials, two large phase III studies have begun. The first study was a multicenter, multinational trial sponsored by Eli Lilly and Company, which randomized more than 430 patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma to cisplatin with or without pemetrexed. That trial completed enrollment in February 2001 and is the largest trial ever conducted in mesothelioma. The second trial is being conducted by the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and compares cisplatin with or without raltitrexed with planned accrual of 240 patients. In both trials, survival is the main endpoint. These trials will help to define the role of these new antifolates in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Combination raltitrexed (Tomudex(R))-oxaliplatin: a step forward in the struggle against mesothelioma? The Institut Gustave Roussy experience with chemotherapy and chemo-immunotherapy in mesothelioma

The aim of this study was to review the experience of the Institut Gustave Roussy in 163 patients with malignant mesothelioma over a 9-year period. Data from seven consecutive prospective trials, four of chemo-immunotherapy and three of chemotherapy were reviewed. The rationale, methods and results of these trials are summarised and discussed. 98 patients were included in four phase II trials of chemo-immunotherapy whose common denominator was a combination of cisplatin and alpha-interferon. The response rate ranged from 15% to 40%. High-dose weekly cisplatin combined with alpha-interferon yielded the highest response rate but the toxicity of this regimen was considered unacceptable. Neither higher doses of alpha-interferon or the addition of mitomycin C or interleukin-2 to the regimen were able to enhance the activity of this combination. 18 patients were included in a paclitaxel-cisplatin phase II trial. The response rate was only 6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0-24) and toxicity was also significant. This regimen was, therefore, considered ineffective. Of 17 patients with mesothelioma included in a phase I trial that combined raltitrexed and oxaliplatin, 6 (35%) obtained a partial response. Responses were seen even in cisplatin-refractory mesothelioma. Preliminary results of a subsequent ongoing phase II trial using raltitrexed (3 mg/m(2)) and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m(2)) have confirmed this promising activity with a 30% (9/30) response rate (95% CI: 15-49). The tolerance of this outpatient regimen is acceptable (no significant haematological toxicity and no alopecia) and compares favourably with that of our previous regimens. The final results concerning response and survival are required to confirm the efficacy of this combination. The preliminary results of two studies suggest promising activity with the combination of raltitrexed-oxaliplatin in malignant mesothelioma. The efficacy/toxicity ratio of this combination compares favourably with that of our previous chemotherapy and chemo-immunotherapy regimens.