193 Paclitaxel/cisplatin chemotherapy in extensive stage small cell lung cancer

Cisplatin plus etoposide chemotherapy followed by thoracic irradiation and paclitaxel plus cisplatin consolidation therapy for patients with limited stage small cell lung carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of a cisplatin plus etoposide regimen followed by thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) and paclitaxel plus cisplatin consolidation chemotherapy in patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine patients with limited SCLC were enrolled onto this study. Patients received three courses of cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v., day 1 and etoposide 100 mg/m2 i.v., days 1-3 (EP regimen), followed by TRT (45-56 Gy administered in 15 fractions), and three courses of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 i.v., day 1 and cisplatin, as previously, on day 2 (PP regimen); cycles were repeated every 21 days.

RESULTS

All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 34 for response. The overall response rate was 67% (CR: 26%; PR: 41%; intention-to-treat analysis) (95% CI: 53.0-84.2%). After a median follow-up period of 15 months, the median survival time was 15 months, the median time to tumor progression 8.3 months and the 1-year survival rate 53.8%. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 39% and 36% of patients receiving EP and PP regimens, respectively. The incidence of febrile neutropenia was 5% and 3% for EP and PP regimens, respectively. Other hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities were mild, with the exception of esophagitis occurring in 36% of patients during and/or immediately after radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Consolidation therapy with PP after sequential EP and thoracic radiotherapy is feasible and well-tolerated; however, the efficacy results are comparable with those previously obtained in the same patients' population using a combination of EP and TRT.

Long-term survival in SCLC after treatment with paclitaxel, carboplatin and etoposide--a phase II study

PURPOSE

We evaluated the toxicity and feasibility of adding paclitaxel to a standard platinum/etoposide regimen in the first-line treatment of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighty-nine patients with limited disease (LD) or extensive disease without distant metastases (ED I) were treated in this multi-centered phase II trial between April 1996 and June 1997. Paclitaxel administration (175 mg/m(2) by a 1 h intravenous infusion) was immediately followed by a 30 min infusion of carboplatin at an area under the concentration time curve (AUC) of 5 on day 1 and etoposide 50 mg orally twice daily (bid) was given on days 2-8. Courses were repeated every 21 days. Patients who had an objective response continued treatment for a maximum of 6 courses.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients were assessable for response. Overall response rate (RR) was 82.1% with 17.8% complete remissions and 64.3% partial remissions. Median survival for LD patients was 20.5 months with a 1 year survival rate of 71.4% and a 3 year survival rate of 21.4%. Median survival of ED I patients was 11 months with a 1 year survival rate of 31.3% and a 3 year survival rate of 3.1%. Overall median survival was 18.1 months with a 1 year survival rate of 56.8% and a 3 year survival rate of 14.8%. Median progression-free intervals were 12.3 months for patients with LD stage of the disease and 8 months with ED I stage. Grade 3/4 toxicity was primarily hematologic. Grade 3/4 leucopenia occurred in 16.0% of courses and febrile episodes were detected in 0.3% of courses. Non-hematologic toxicities were uncommon. Grade 3 GI-tract toxicities or peripheral neuropathy appeared in less than 1% of the courses. Toxicities were detected according to WHO toxicity criteria.

CONCLUSION

Paclitaxel can be added at full dose (175 mg/m(2)) to a carboplatin/etoposide combination while maintaining a tolerable toxicity profile. Efficacy data, RR, progression-free interval and survival in both, extensive and limited stage patients compare favorably with other reported data. This new regimen will be further evaluated in comparison to standard regimens in a phase III trial.