Phase II study of paclitaxel and carboplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Multiple cycles of PBPC-supported high-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel following mobilization with epirubicin and cisplatin are feasible but ineffective in treating patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

We verified the feasibility of a multi-cycle peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC)-supported high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) regimen in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The HDC regimen consisted of a single course of high-dose epirubicin given in combination with cisplatin plus filgrastim, followed by three courses of high doses of carboplatin and paclitaxel with PBPC reinfusion and filgrastim. Of the 16 enrolled patients, 13 provided an adequate number of PBPCs by a single leukapheresis, while in the three needed two procedures, with a median number of CD34+, CD34+/CD33- and CD34+/CD38- cells collected per patient was 13.5 x 10(6), 10.9 x 10(6) and 0.9 x 10(6)/kg, respectively. No toxic death occurred, and the collected PBPCs supported a rapid hematopoietic reconstitution after HDC; however, seven patients early interrupted the treatment early due to early progressive disease (n=4) or prolonged grade 3 peripheral neurotoxicity (n=3). Despite an overall response rate of 42%, the median survival for stage IV patients has been 5 months (range: 1-25+). Of two patients with stage IIIB NSCLC, one is continuously disease-free at 71+ months, while of 14 with stage IV disease, one is currently alive with disease at 25+ months. In conclusion, the combination of high-dose epirubicin with cisplatin plus filgrastim is an effective regimen in releasing large amounts of PBPCs, which can then be safely employed to support multiple courses of HDC. Multiple cycles of PBPC-supported high-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel are ineffective in treating patients with advanced NSCLC.

Paclitacxel and carboplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of paclitacxel and carboplatin on advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Forty-eight patients with locally advanced (stage IIIb) or metastatic (stage IV) NSCLC were enrolled into the study. The patients received paclitacxel 55-60 mg/m(2) on day 1, 8, 15, carboplatin at an AUC of 5 on day 1, administreted in 28-day cycle. An objective response was obtained in 37.5% of patients (two complete and 16 partial responses). Significant difference existed between the naive patients and pretreated patients (46.4% vs. 25.0%, P<0.05). The main toxicities were bone marrow suppression, nausea/vomiting and alopecia. The combination of paclitacxel and carboplatin is an effective, well-tolerated scheme in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. The efficacy is higher in the naive group than in the pretreated group.

Taxanes in the treatment of advanced (stage III and IV) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): recent developments

Taxanes, paclitaxel, and docetaxel have become the cornerstone of both first-line and second-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recently, several pivotal phase III randomized trials have been published. These studies and phase II trials will be discussed. Additionally, studies utilizing a taxane and radiation therapy for resectable and locally advanced NSCLC will be outlined. The article will end with a discussion on newer strategies being currently explored to improve survival in advanced NSCLC.

Paclitaxel plus carboplatin, compared with paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, shows similar efficacy while more cost-effective: a randomized phase II study of combination chemotherapy against inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer previously untreated

BACKGROUND

Paclitaxel (Taxol) plus carboplatin (PC) has shown activity in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Non-platinum-containing combination chemotherapy, such as paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (PG), has also demonstrated reasonable efficacy. Our aim here was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of PC versus PG in chemo-naive. advanced NSCLC patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ninety (68 male, 22 female) patients were enrolled from August 1999 to August 2000. The performance status was one in 29 patients and two in 16 patients of the PC group, and one in 24 patients and two in 21 patients of the PG group. Seventeen patients had stage IIIb disease and 28 patients stage IV disease in the PC group: 18 patients had stage IIIb disease and 27 patients stage IV disease in the PG group (New International Staging System). Treatment consisted of P 175 mg/m2 and C at AUC = 7 (predicted using measured clearances and the Calvert formula) intravenous infusion (i.v.) on day 1, or P 175 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 and G 1000 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

In all, 175 cycles of PC and 184 cycles of PG were given in the PC and PG groups, respectively. The median treatment cycle was four cycles in both groups. All the patients were assessable for toxicity and response measurement. There were three complete responses and 15 partial responses (overall 40%) in the PC group, and no complete response, but 18 partial responses (overall 40%) in the PG group. WHO grades 3/4 leukopenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in six (13.3%), seven (15.5%) and five patients (11.1%) in the PC group; and in four (8.9%), six (13.3%) and 0 patients in the PG group, respectively. Two patients in each group suffered from grade 3 peripheral neuropathy. Other non-hematological toxicities were mild and few. Median survival time was 14.1 months in the PC group and 12.6 months in the PG group. One-year survival was 50.7% in the PC group and 53.3% in the PG group. The PG group had a higher total expense and expended more days undergoing treatment than the PC group (P = 0.034 and 0.069, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Both PC and PG combination chemotherapy produce a similar efficacy in the treatment of NSCLC. However, PC is more cost-effective than PG.

Survival advantage for carboplatin substituting cisplatin in combination with vindesine and mitomycin C for stage IIIB and IV squamous-cell bronchogenic carcinoma: a randomized phase III study

This communication represents the definitive report of a randomized phase III study comparing cisplatin and carboplatin, in combination with vindesine and mitomycin C in stage IIIB and IV squamous-cell bronchogenic carcinoma. A total of 221 patients entered the study and were randomized into two arms. Of these, 114 patients (109 evaluable for activity) were randomized to arm A, receiving cisplatin 120 mg/m(2), mitomycin C 8 mg/m(2) and vindesine 3 mg/m(2) per cycle; 107 patients (101 evaluable for activity) were randomized to arm B receiving carboplatin 500 mg/m(2) with the same doses of mitomycin C and vindesine per cycle. Patients with progressive disease (PD) were excluded from the study after the 2nd cycle, and those with stable disease (SD), partial response (PR) and complete response (CR) received six cycles of chemotherapy (or less in case of early progression). Patients were stratified according to the clinical stage (IIIB vs. IV), performance status (0+1 vs. 2+3) and tumor histological grade (I+II vs. III). In the cisplatin arm two patients (1.9%) achieved a CR, 38 (34.9%) a PR, 45 (41.2%) a SD and 24 (22.0%) had PD; the overall response rate was 40/109 (36.8%). In the carboplatin arm five patients (5.0%) achieved a CR, 31 (30.7%) a PR, 40 (39.6%) a SD, and 25 (24.7%) had PD; the overall response rate was 36/101 (35.7%). No statistically significant difference in response rate was present between the two arms, and the response rate was not influenced by performance status, histological grade or clinical stage. The Kaplan-Meyers curves displayed a significant advantage both for time to progression (P=0.005) and overall survival (P=0.008) for patients in the carboplatin arm. The advantage for patients receiving carboplatin instead of cisplatin appeared evident in univariate setting for patients with a good performance status and clinical stage IV, and occurred irrespectively of tumor histological grade; response duration and survival of responders was identical in the two arms. Patients achieving a stable disease survived longer in the carboplatin than in the cisplatin arm (P=0.012). Thus, substitution of cisplatin by carboplatin in the combination chemotherapy regimen, although more hematologically toxic (but less emetogenic) resulted in a similar response rate, but a significantly longer time to progression and overall survival.

Randomized phase III trial of paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin in the treatment of patients with advanced non--small-cell lung cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group trial

PURPOSE

This randomized trial was designed to determine whether paclitaxel plus carboplatin (PC) offered a survival advantage over vinorelbine plus cisplatin (VC) for patients with advanced non--small-cell lung cancer. Secondary objectives were to compare toxicity, tolerability, quality of life (QOL), and resource utilization.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred two patients received VC (vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2)/wk and cisplatin 100 mg/m(2)/d, day 1 every 28 days) and 206 patients received PC (paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2) over 3 hours with carboplatin area under the curve of 6, day 1 every 21 days). Patients completed QOL questionnaires at baseline, 13 weeks, and 25 weeks. Resource utilization forms were completed at five time points through 24 months.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics were similar between the groups. The objective response rate was 28% in the VC arm and 25% in the PC arm. Median survival was 8 months in both arms, with 1-year survival rates of 36% and 38%, respectively. Grade 3 and 4 leukopenia (P =.002) and neutropenia (P =.008) occurred more frequently on the VC arm. Grade 3 nausea and vomiting were higher on the VC arm (P =.001, P =.007), and grade 3 peripheral neuropathy was higher on the PC arm (P <.001). More patients on the VC arm discontinued therapy because of toxicity (P =.001). No difference in QOL was observed. Overall costs on the PC arm were higher than on the VC arm because of drug costs.

CONCLUSION

PC is equally efficacious as VC for the treatment of advanced non--small-cell lung cancer. PC is less toxic and better tolerated but more expensive than VC. New treatment strategies should be pursued.

A Phase II study of docetaxel and carboplatin in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

We investigated the efficacy of docetaxel (D) in combination with carboplatin (C) in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Since 1996, 123 with inoperable NSCLC were enrolled in the study; 120 (108 males, 12 females; mean age 58.0+/-8.3 years) were evaluated. Of those, 46 patients had squamous carcinoma, 44 adenocarcinoma, 11 large cell carcinoma and 19 undifferentiated tumours. Eligibility criteria included, documented inoperable NSCLC, WHO performance status (PS) 0-1, age up to 70 years, and normal renal and hepatic function. A total of 622 cycles of chemotherapy (CHT) (median 7 (95% CI 6.2-7.47), courses per patient) were administered. Each cycle consisted of 100 mg/m(2) of docetaxel in a 2-h infusion with C at a dose of area under the curve (AUC) of 6 on day 1. This regimen was repeated every 28 days up to eight cycles. Of the patients, five (4%) achieved complete response, 49 (40%) partial response, 47 (39%) had stable disease and 19 (15%) had progressive disease. The median survival was 12 months for all patients, 12 for the four patients with stage IIb disease, 18 for the patients with stage IIIa disease, 20 for the 29 patients with stage IIIb disease, and 11 for the 65 stage IV patients. The median time to progression was 8 months (90 patients). Toxicity was, grade 3/4 neutropenia, 18 patients (15%); grade 3/4 anaemia, 6 patients (5%); and tolerable peripheral neuropathy, 16 patients (13.3%). Responders received radiotherapy (total dose, 50 Gy in 4 weeks) between the 6th and 8th cycle. Among responders with initial stage IIIb disease, 7 (5%) underwent surgical resection. Patients with early progression of the disease received the same dose of radiotherapy between 2nd and 3rd cycle. The study is ongoing, and six patients (5%) are still alive (after 3 years). Preliminary results indicate that the D/C combination is very active in the treatment of NSCLC with tolerable toxicity. It appears that this drug combination is also good as neoadjuvant therapy in inoperable NSCLC patients.

Adenovirus-mediated wild-type p53 gene transfer in patients receiving chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a multicenter phase II study

PURPOSE

To study the additional benefit from adenoviral p53 gene therapy in patients undergoing first-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-five patients with nonresectable NSCLC were enrolled in an open-label, multicenter phase II study of three cycles of regimen A, carboplatin (area under the curve, 6; day 1) plus paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2), day 1), or regimen B, cisplatin (100 mg/m(2), day 1) plus vinorelbine (25 mg/m(2), days 1, 8, 15, and 22) in combination with intratumoral injection of 7.5 x 10(12) particles of SCH 58500 (rAd/p53, day 1). Responses of individual tumor lesions were assessed after each cycle, and gene transfer was examined in posttreatment tumor biopsies using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the response rate of lesions treated with p53 gene therapy in addition to chemotherapy (52% objective responses) and lesions treated with chemotherapy alone (48% objective responses). Subgroup analysis according to the chemotherapy regimens revealed evidence for increased mean local tumor regressions in response to additional p53 gene therapy in patients receiving regimen B, but not in patients receiving regimen A. There was no survival difference between the two chemotherapy regimens, and the median survival of the cohort was 10.5 months (1-year survival, 44%). Transgene expression was confirmed in tumor samples from 68% of patients, and toxicities attributable to gene therapy were mild to moderate.

CONCLUSION

Intratumoral adenoviral p53 gene therapy appears to provide no additional benefit in patients receiving an effective first-line chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC.

Phase II trial of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and concurrent radiation therapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

We conducted a phase II trial to investigate the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiation in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thirty patients with inoperable NSCLC were enrolled onto a multicenter phase II trial of concurrent chemoradiation therapy. Patients received six weekly cycles of paclitaxel 45 mg/m(2) over 1 h; carboplatin at (area under the curve) AUC 2; and radiation therapy of 60 Gy. Radiation was administered to the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes (40 Gy over 4 weeks) followed by a boost to the primary tumor (20 Gy in 2 weeks). After the initial phase of concurrent chemoradiation, patients received an additional four cycles of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) over 3 h and carboplatin at AUC 6 every 3 weeks. The overall objective response rate of 30 assessable patients was 76.7%. At the median follow-up time of 13.1 months, the median survival time was 14.5 months (95% CI, 10.59-18.48). The median progression-free survival was 10.5 months (95% CI, 7.72-13.28). The major toxicity was hematologic. The incidence of grade 3 esophagitis was 10%. In conclusion, this chemoradiation regimen is well tolerated and shows significant clinical results for locally advanced NSCLC. Locoregional failure rate remains an important issue with this newer chemotherapeutic regimen. A novel chemotherapy and radiation therapy is clearly needed.

Paclitaxel and Carboplatin (PC) Regimen for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

The increasing complexity of cancer chemotherapy makes it mandatory that pharmacists be familiar with these highly toxic agents. This column reviews various issues related to the preparation, dispensing, and administration of cancer chemotherapy, both commercially available and investigational.