A randomized phase II trial of two schedules of topotecan for the treatment of advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer

Inhalation delivery dramatically improves the efficacy of topotecan for the treatment of local and distant lung cancer

Topotecan is potent anti-cancer drug approved for various malignancies but hematopoietic toxicities undermine its wider application and use of its most effective dose. This study aims to improve these limitations through inhalation-delivery. The pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and toxicity of 2–5 times lower inhalation doses of topotecan dry-powder were compared with the standard intravenous (IV) delivery once/twice-a-week. Human-derived EGFR-mutant (H1975), KRAS-mutant (A549), and EGFR/KRAS wild-type (H358) orthotopic and distant lung tumors were evaluated in murine models. Inhalation of 1 mg/kg topotecan significantly improved the half-life and drug exposure (area under the curve, AUC) compared to 5 mg/kg via IV-delivery. AUCs (h*ng/mL) for inhaled/IV topotecan in plasma, lung, liver, and brain were, 831/888, 60,000/1080, 8380/4000, and 297/15, respectively; while the half-life was also greatly increased in these tissues. The average lung tumor burden of H358-derived tumors was reduced from 15.0 g to 8.4 g (44%) in rats treated once-a-week with 2 mg/kg IV and 1.8 g (88%) with 1 mg/kg inhaled topotecan, corroborating previous findings using A549- and H1975-derived orthotopic lung tumors. Importantly, inhaled topotecan showed superior efficacy in suppressing lung tumors at distant sites. The growth of H1975- and H358-derived subcutaneous xenografts were completely arrested and A549-derived tumors were significantly reduced in mice treated twice-a-week with 1 mg/kg inhaled topotecan compared to a minor (H1975 and H358) or no reduction (A549) with twice-a-week 5 mg/kg IV topotecan.

Inhalation delivery of topotecan is superior to intravenous exposure for suppressing lung cancer in a preclinical model

Intravenous (IV) topotecan is approved for the treatment of various malignancies including lung cancer but its clinical use is greatly undermined by severe hematopoietic toxicity. We hypothesized that inhalation delivery of topotecan would increase local exposure and efficacy against lung cancer while reducing systemic exposure and toxicity. These hypotheses were tested in a preclinical setting using a novel inhalable formulation of topotecan against the standard IV dose. Respirable dry-powder of topotecan was manufactured through spray-drying technology and the pharmacokinetics of 0.14 and 0.79 mg/kg inhalation doses were compared with 0.7 mg/kg IV dose. The efficacy of four weekly treatments with 1 mg/kg inhaled vs. 2 mg/kg IV topotecan were compared to untreated control using an established orthotopic lung cancer model for a fast (H1975) and moderately growing (A549) human lung tumors in the nude rat. Inhalation delivery increased topotecan exposure of lung tissue by approximately 30-fold, lung and plasma half-life by 5- and 4-folds, respectively, and reduced the maximum plasma concentration by 2-fold than the comparable IV dose. Inhaled topotecan improved the survival of rats with the fast-growing lung tumors from 7 to 80% and reduced the tumor burden of the moderately-growing lung tumors over 5- and 10-folds, respectively, than the 2-times higher IV topotecan and untreated control (p < .00001). These results indicate that inhalation delivery increases topotecan exposure of lung tissue and improves its efficacy against lung cancer while also lowering the effective dose and maximum systemic concentration that is responsible for its dose-limiting toxicity.

Role of Topotecan in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Review of Literature

Topotecan (TPT), a chemotherapeutic agent, is a topoisomerase-I inhibitor. Topoisomerase-I is a nuclear enzyme that relieves torsion strain in DNA by opening single strand breaks which helps in DNA replication. TPT inhibits this enzyme, thus preventing DNA replication and causes cell death. TPT has demonstrated to have broad spectrum of antitumor activity in tumors like cervical, ovarian, endometrial and small cell lung cancers (SCLCs). The intravenous (IV) formulation of the drug is currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with SCLC and ovarian cancer at a dose of 1.5 mg/m² administered daily for five consecutive days, with treatment cycles repeated every 3 weeks. TPT has shown some promising activity in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with favorable side effect profile. Several clinical trials have been conducted with TPT in either IV or oral formulation for the treatment of NSCLC as a first or second-line treatment. Here we reviewed all the clinical trials done with TPT to date in the treatment of NSCLC both as a single-agent and combination therapy.

SULF2 methylation is prognostic for lung cancer survival and increases sensitivity to topoisomerase-I inhibitors via induction of ISG15

The heparan sulfate 6-O-endosulfatase (SULF2) promotes growth and metastasis of solid tumors. We recently identified that cytosine methylation of the SULF2 promoter is associated with better survival of resected lung adenocarcinoma patients and now also demonstrate a marginal improvement in survival of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving standard chemotherapy (HR = 0.63, p = 0.07). Subsequent studies focused on investigating the effect of methylation on SULF2 expression and its genome-wide impact. The genes and pathways modulated by epigenetic inactivation of SULF2 and the effects on sensitivity to chemotherapy were characterized in vitro and in vivo. Silencing SULF2 through siRNA or methylation primarily increased expression of interferon-inducible genes including ISG15, a marker for increased sensitivity to topoisomerase-1 inhibitors such as camptothecin. NSCLC cell lines with methylated SULF2 (SULF2M) express 60-fold higher ISG15 compared to SULF2 unmethylated (SULF2U) NSCLC cell lines and normal human bronchial epithelial cells. In vitro, SULF2M and high ISG15 (ISG15H) expressing NSCLC cell lines were 134-fold more sensitive to camptothecin than SULF2U and low ISG15 (ISG15L) expressing cell lines. Topotecan, a soluble analogue of camptothecin and FDA approved anti-cancer drug, dramatically arrested the growth of SULF2M-ISG15H, but not SULF2U-ISG15L lung tumors in nude mice (p < 0.002). Similarly, high ISG15 expression that is comparable to the topotecan sensitive NSCLC cell lines was found in tumors from 25% of NSCLC patients compared to normal lung indicating a potential to identify and target the most sensitive NSCLC subpopulation for personalized topotecan therapy.

A phase I study of weekly topotecan in combination with pemetrexed in patients with advanced malignancies

INTRODUCTION

This phase I study evaluated the safety, tolerability, preliminary antitumor activity, and pharmacokinetic interaction of weekly topotecan (days 1 and 8) in combination with pemetrexed (day 1 only) in patients with advanced solid tumors.

METHODS

Patients received topotecan (3.0-4.0 mg/m(2) i.v. days 1 and 8) and pemetrexed (375-500 mg/m(2) i.v. day 1) over 21-day cycles. Patients were accrued across five different dose levels and were observed for safety, tolerability, and preliminary activity.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients received 120 cycles of pemetrexed and topotecan, including five patients who received 8, 8, 10, 12, and 17 cycles without dose reductions, confirming a lack of cumulative myelosuppression. Four patients received topotecan (4.0 mg/m(2) i.v.) and pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2) i.v.), but experienced two dose-limiting toxicities (febrile neutropenia, grade 4 thrombocytopenia). As a result, the topotecan (3.5 mg/m(2) i.v.) and pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2) i.v.) group was expanded to 12 patients. The only grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicity was one episode of grade 3 fatigue; no grade 3 or 4 nausea/vomiting/diarrhea, mucositis, or rash was reported. One non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient (12 months) and one soft tissue sarcoma patient (6 months) achieved a partial response.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly topotecan plus every-3-week pemetrexed was well tolerated and active. Full doses of topotecan plus pemetrexed caused brief reversible myelosuppression with minimal dose delays/reductions; no grade 3 or 4 nausea/vomiting/diarrhea, mucositis, or rash was reported. All six NSCLC patients at the recommended phase II dose had at least stable disease as a best response, including one partial response lasting 12 months. There was no evidence of an effect of pemetrexed on topotecan pharmacokinetics. Collectively, these data suggest that further phase II exploration of weekly topotecan plus every-3-week pemetrexed for advanced malignancies is indicated.

Activity of topotecan given intravenously for 5 days every three weeks in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer pretreated with platinum and taxanes: a phase II study

Topotecan, a semi-synthetic camptothecin analogue with topoisomerase I interaction, has shown to be an active agent in the treatment of advanced refractory lung cancer. This paper describes the authors' experience with this drug when used as a single agent in patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) refractory to platinum- and taxane-containing chemotherapy regimens. Thirty-five patients with NSCLC refractory to previous chemotherapy and KI ≥ 60% were included in the study. Their characteristics are as follows: median age of 52 years (range 43-69) and Karnofsky PS of 70 (60-80); 27 were male and 8 were female. Twenty-one (60%) patients had adenocarcinoma; eleven (31.4%), squamous cell, and three (8.5%), undifferentiated carcinoma. There was a median of two disease sites and two prior chemotherapy regimens. Topotecan was administered at a dose of 1.25 mg/m(2) I.V. daily for 5 days, repeated every 21 days until disease progression, maximal response, or intolerable toxicity. After 73 cycles, patients received a median of 2 treatment cycles (1-9). All patients except one were considered evaluable for toxicity; eight episodes (24%) of nausea/vomiting and two episodes (6%) of grade 1-2 asthenia, respectively, were reported. Four (12%) patients developed grade 1-2 anemia and two (6%) subjects suffered grade 3 anemia. Seven (21%) patients had grade 1-2 neutropenia and one (3%) presented grade 5 neutropenia. In 33 patients evaluable for activity of the 35 subjects included in the study; one (2.8%) presented a partial response; nine (25.7%) had stable disease, and 23 (65.7%) exhibited disease progression. Median time to progression and overall survival were 54 (12-210) and 70 (12-324) days, respectively. Intravenous topotecan at that dose and administration schedule displays scant activity in terms of response rate in individuals with advanced NSCLC previously treated with platinum and taxanes. The role and usefulness of chemotherapy in this setting warrants further investigation and confirmation through comparative studies.

Does an optimal therapeutic sequence exist in advanced non-small cell lung cancer?

BACKGROUND

A growing percentage of patients affected by advanced non-small cell lung cancer who progressed after first-line chemotherapy still have a good performance status and require second-line treatment.

OBJECTIVE

An overview of the state of the art of second-line therapeutic options is presented.

METHODS

The scope of the review is to give an update on the therapeutic options currently available for the second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Among chemotherapeutic drugs docetaxel and pemetrexed have been approved for second-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Although the drugs are equiactive in terms of response rate and survival parameters the latter has a clear-cut advantage in terms of tolerability and quality of life. Therefore, pemetrexed is considered the best second-line therapeutic option in order to avoid severe side effects. Among biologic agents the tyrosine kinase inhibitors gefinitib and erlotinib have been largely tested, but only the latter has been approved for second- and third-line treatment. Erlotinib has been reported to be particularly active in patients with adenocarcinoma, in females, in patients of Asian ethnicity and in epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and it is also active in the third-line setting. At present, no direct head to head comparison of erlotinib with any chemotherapeutic agent has been performed. A rational decision tree may therefore include pemetrexed or docetaxel (the former preferred for tolerability) or erlotinib as standard second-line therapy. Erlotinib has been also shown to be active as third-line treatment: however, in cases of patients with clinical characteristics suggesting a good response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors, erlotinib may be employed in an earlier phase.

Recent advances with topotecan in the treatment of lung cancer

Topotecan is a semisynthetic derivative of camptothecin that specifically targets topoisomerase I. It has well-established antineoplastic properties and has been successfully combined with other antineoplastic agents with activity dependent on DNA disruption, such as cisplatin and etoposide. Topotecan is indicated for the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) sensitive disease after failure of first-line chemotherapy and metastatic ovarian carcinoma after failure of initial or subsequent chemotherapy. Since the approval of topotecan for the second-line treatment of SCLC, studies have been conducted in the first-line setting. Recent studies demonstrate the utility of i.v. topotecan in combination with cisplatin for untreated SCLC. Further, an oral formulation of topotecan is currently under investigation and may provide added convenience for patients. Oral topotecan has been studied in the first- and second-line settings for both SCLC and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Three recent phase III trials have demonstrated the activity of oral topotecan. In the first study of chemotherapy-naïve patients with extensive-disease SCLC, oral topotecan plus cisplatin provided efficacy and safety similar to those of etoposide plus cisplatin. In a second study of patients with relapsed SCLC, treatment with oral topotecan showed a statistically significant and clinically meaningful longer overall survival time and improvement in dyspnea and quality of life compared with best supportive care alone in all prognostic groups. Finally, in previously treated patients with NSCLC, single-agent oral topotecan was shown to be noninferior in 1-year survival rate relative to the current standard of i.v. docetaxel. In future studies, oral topotecan will represent a good candidate for combination therapy with other i.v. or oral chemotherapy agents, monoclonal antibodies, and small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

A prognostic model for advanced stage nonsmall cell lung cancer. Pooled analysis of North Central Cancer Treatment Group trials

BACKGROUND

A pooled analysis was performed to examine the impact of pretreatment factors on overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) in patients with advanced-stage nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to construct a prediction equation for OS using pretreatment factors.

METHODS

A pooled data set of 1053 patients from 9 North Central Cancer Treatment Group trials was used. Age, gender, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS), tumor stage (Stage IIIB vs. Stage IV), body mass index (BMI), creatinine level, hemoglobin (Hgb) level, white blood cell (WBC) count, and platelet count were evaluated for their prognostic significance in both univariate and multivariate analyses by using a Cox proportional-hazards model.

RESULTS

Patients who had high WBC counts, low Hgb levels, PS >0, BMI < 18.5 kg/m2, and TNM Stage IV disease had significantly worse TTP and OS. Patients who had Stage IV disease with a high WBC count had a particularly poor prognosis. An equation to predict the OS of patients with Stage IV NSCLC based on pretreatment PS, BMI, Hgb level, and WBC count was constructed.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to the widely accepted prognostic factors of PS, BMI, and disease stage, both of the readily available laboratory parameters of Hgb level and WBC count were found to be significant prognostic factors for OS and TTP in patients with advanced-stage NSCLC. The authors' prediction equation can be used to evaluate the benefit of a treatment in Phase II trials by comparing the observed survival of a cohort with its expected survival by using the patients' own prognostic factors in place of comparisons with historic data that may have substantially different baseline patient characteristics.

Phase III study comparing oral topotecan to intravenous docetaxel in patients with pretreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

This open-label, randomized, multicenter, phase III study compared oral topotecan versus intravenous (IV) docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with stage III or IV NSCLC, performance status < or = 2, who had received only one prior chemotherapy regimen, were randomly assigned to treatment with oral topotecan 2.3 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 5 or IV docetaxel 75 mg/m2 day 1 every 21 days.

RESULTS

A total of 829 patients were randomly assigned. In intent-to-treat analysis, 1-year survival rates were 25.1% with topotecan and 28.7% with docetaxel. The difference of -3.6% (95% CI, -9.59% to 2.48%) met the predefined criteria for noninferiority of topotecan relative to docetaxel because the lower limit of the 95% CI was above -10%. Median survival was 27.9 weeks with topotecan and 30.7 weeks with docetaxel. Although not statistically significant (log-rank P = .057), the higher survival rate with docetaxel was maintained across the entire treatment period. The median time to progression was 11.3 weeks with topotecan versus 13.1 weeks with docetaxel (log-rank P = .02). The overall response rate was 5% in each group. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred more frequently with docetaxel (60% v 50%). Grade 3/4 anemia and thrombocytopenia occurred more frequently with topotecan (26% v 10% and 26% v 7%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Oral topotecan provides activity in the treatment of relapsed, locally advanced, unresectable NSCLC. Both regimens were well tolerated with differing safety profiles. Topotecan may provide an option for patients who desire an orally available treatment after relapse.

Update on the role of topotecan in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is an aggressive disease that is generally resistant to chemotherapy. As a result, the prognosis for patients with NSCLC is poor. Currently, platinum-based regimens are the standard of care for patients with advanced NSCLC. However, these regimens are associated with severe and often cumulative hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities, limiting dose intensity. Therefore, novel chemotherapeutic agents and combination regimens may improve the outcome for these patients. A variety of new agents and combinations have been investigated in the treatment of NSCLC. However, to date, no clearly superior single-agent or combination regimen has emerged. Topotecan (Hycamtin; GlaxoSmithKline; Philadelphia, PA), a topoisomerase I inhibitor, is currently approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and is associated with manageable, noncumulative, hematologic toxicities. In addition, topotecan demonstrates a favorable nonhematologic tolerability profile compared with agents currently used in the treatment of patients with NSCLC. The success of topotecan in patients with SCLC has made it an attractive option in the NSCLC setting. Topotecan-based combination regimens in the first-line treatment of NSCLC have demonstrated promising antitumor activities with favorable toxicity profiles. Many topotecan combination regimens have induced stable disease, a response that may offer meaningful clinical benefit in the palliative treatment of patients with advanced disease. Topotecan plus gemcitabine (Gemzar; Eli Lilly and Company; Indianapolis, IN) and single-agent topotecan may be particularly appropriate for patients in the second-line setting, in which palliation of symptoms is an important outcome of chemotherapy. Herein, the future role of topotecan in the first- and second-line treatment of NSCLC and the potential role of resistance mechanisms obtained from in vivo dose-response studies in designing future combination regimens are discussed.

Ex vivo analysis of topotecan: advancing the application of laboratory-based clinical therapeutics

Topotecan is currently approved for relapsed small-cell lung cancer and ovarian cancer. Topotecan's efficacy in the second-line setting and novel mechanism of action suggest broad antitumour activity. We utilised a clinically validated, cell-death, ex vivo assay in human tumour explants to examine the activity profile of topotecan alone and in combination with other antitumour agents. Serial dilutions of topotecan alone and in combination with other cytotoxic agents were applied to biopsy specimens of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and breast, colon, and prostate cancers. Dose-response curves were interpolated to provide 50% lethal concentrations (LC(50)). The degree of synergy (by median effect) and normalised Z-scores (raw scores converted to relative activity distributed around the mean) were then computed. Single-agent activity was observed for topotecan in all four tumour types. In 57 chemotherapy-naive specimens, NSCLC revealed the highest activity, demonstrated by the lowest LC(50) value (0.26+/-0.06 microg ml(-1); P=0.002). Overall, previously treated and chemotherapy-naive specimens revealed no significant differences in mean LC(50)'s. Synergy was observed for several combinations, including topotecan plus cisplatin in prostate and for topotecan plus 5-fluorouracil in breast cancers. The Z-score analyses conducted suggest activity for previously unexplored drug regimens, including topotecan plus 5-fluorouracil, vinorelbine, and mitomycin-C in NSCLC and breast cancer. Phase II studies are underway to determine the degree to which these ex vivo findings will translate into improved clinical results.

Single-agent chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

The survival and quality of life benefits of combination chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are now well recognized. Since many clinical trials have been conducted in relatively young patients with good performance status, many elderly patients and patients with poor performance status are not offered chemotherapy because of concerns about higher risks of toxicity. The newer agents, including topotecan, are active as single agents in NSCLC, achieving response rates of up to 30%. Overall survival and symptoms may be improved when these agents are added to best supportive care. They are well tolerated in both elderly patients and patients with poor performance status. The major toxicity with the standard 5-day administration schedule of topotecan is myelosuppression, but weekly schedules may offer reduced toxicity while maintaining efficacy. Thus, single-agent therapy with newer agents is generally considered in elderly and poor performance status patients. However, combination chemotherapy may also be appropriate for some patients in these subgroups. Future studies of chemotherapy in NSCLC should not exclude elderly patients and patients with poor performance status.

Randomized phase II study of daily versus continuous-infusion schedules of topotecan in the treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancers

A randomized two-stage, phase II study was conducted to assess the antitumor activity of two different schedules of topotecan in the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) in chemotherapy-naive patients. A total of 40 eligible patients were randomized to receive either the daily schedule, with topotecan being administered intravenously at 1.5 mg/m2 daily for 5 days every 3 weeks, or the continuous-infusion schedule, with topotecan administered intravenously at a dosage of 1.3 mg/m2 per day over 72 hours every 4 weeks. Randomization to the continuous-infusion schedule was discontinued due to inactivity, and an additional 20 patients were treated on the daily schedule. Patients received an average of 5 courses (range: 1-13) of the daily schedule compared to an average of 2 courses (range: 1-7) of the continuous-infusion schedule (p < 0.01). Confirmed response rates for the daily and continuous-infusion schedules are 62.5% (90% CI: 49-75%) and 15% (90% CI: 1-29%), respectively. Toxicity was predominantly hematologic with 92% (55/60) having greater than or equal to grade III neutropenia and 58% (35/60) reporting greater than or equal to grade III leukopenia for both IV schedules. Nonhematologic toxicity was very mild, with only 10% (6/60) patients experiencing grade IV toxicities. One patient died of infection on the continuous-infusion arm. Median times to progression for the daily and continuous-infusion schedules are 5 months (90% CI: 4.4-7.2) and 2 months (90% CI: 1.1-2.1), respectively. Estimated 1-year survival rates for patients receiving daily and continuous-infusion schedules are 63% (90% CI: 51-76%) and 55% (90% CI: 39-77%), respectively. Fifty percent (30/60) of patients received second-line therapy with etoposide and cisplatin. Forty-three percent (13/30) of patients who received second-line therapy achieved a confirmed response. Topotecan showed significant activity in the treatment of extensive stage SCLC when administered as a brief daily IV repeated every 3 weeks.

Phase I/II clinical trial of concurrent radiochemotherapy in combination with topotecan for the treatment of brain metastases

The prognosis of patients with brain metastases is very poor. In this phase I/II study we tested the feasibility, dosage, toxicity and tumour efficacy of a concurrent radiochemotherapy regimen including topotecan. Twenty patients were recruited between July 1998 and February 2000 (9 women, 11 men) and treated with a whole-brain irradiation of 40 Gy (some patients were also given a boost) in combination with topotecan given as a 21-day continuous infusion in a dosage of 0.4 to 0.6 mg/m2/day. The median survival was five months (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 2-8 months). In 13 of 20 patients, it was possible to evaluate the remission with computed tomography (CT) scans or magnetic resonance scans. We detected four complete responders (CRs), two partial responders (PRs), and one progressive disease (PD). 6 patients had stable disease (SD). An intracerebral recurrence was experienced in 3 patients, 3 patients experienced spinal lesions. Systemic progression of cancer outside the central nervous system (CNS) was dominant in 9 of 20 patients. A reversible, non-cumulative haematological toxicity mainly occurring from a dose of 0.5 mg/m2/day and above was dose-limiting for this type of therapy. Combined concurrent radiochemotherapy with topotecan is feasible in spite of various pretreatments. Myelosuppression was the dominant toxicity, which was reversible and manageable. We recommend a dose of 0.4 mg/m2/day of topotecan as a 21-day continuous infusion therapy in combination with radiotherapy.

A phase I study of sequential intravenous topotecan and etoposide in lung cancer patients

PURPOSE

The topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan (T) and the topoisomerase II inhibitor etoposide (E) are active drugs in lung cancer. The complementary functions of their targets may suggest benefit from the combined use of these agents but drug scheduling has been shown to play a critical role in preclinical models. To establish the optimal schedule and assess the impact of sequential administration of the combination of T and E, we conducted a dose finding study of sequential intravenous T and E in a four-weekly-schedule in relapsed lung cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The importance of drug sequence was assessed in consecutive patients throughout all dose levels; patients received in the first course either T followed by E (the TE group: T on days 1-3 and E on days 4-6) or E before T (the ET group: F on days 1-3 and Ton days 4-6). The sequence of Tand E was alternated in the successive courses. In this crossover design, each patient served as his own control for analysis of hematological toxicity in which TE sequence was compared to that of the ET sequence. Moreover, hematological toxicity after the first course was compared between the TE and the ET groups. The starting dose was T/E 0.75/75 mg/m2 at dose level 1and dose escalation was planned to T/E 1.00/75 mg/nm2 at dose level 2, T/E 1.00/100 mg/m2 at dose level 3, T/E 1.25/100 mg/m2 at dose level 4 and T/E 1.50/100 mg/m2 at dose level 5. Nineteen patients (small-cell lung cancer 7, non-small-cell lung cancer 11, mesothelioma 1 patient) were included.

RESULTS

The principal toxicity was myelosuppression, primarily neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. At dose level 3 several grade 4 toxicities were observed. DLT (febrile neutropenia) occurred in two patients, one in the TE and one in the ET group and precluded further dose escalation. There was no significant difference in WBC and platelet nadirs during the first course between the TE and the ET group. The influence of the sequence of administration of topotecan and etoposide was calculated by comparing the nadir values of cycles I and II for each patient. For none of the dose levels, a significant sequence-dependent effect could be detected. The MTD was reached at the doses of 100 mg/m2 topotecan and 75 mg/m2 etoposide. No objective responses were seen.

CONCLUSION

Although the combined use of topoisomerase I and II inhibitors is attractive on theoretical grounds, excessive myelosuppression prevents substantial dose escalation.

Topoisomerase I Inhibitors in the Combined Modality Therapy of Lung Cancer

Locally advanced non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents 30%-40% of all pulmonary malignancies. Despite the fact that the disease is confined to the chest, most patients will eventually succumb to their dis-ease. Therefore, the management of NSCLC is undergoing rapid evolution with hope of improving overall survival. The arrival of a new generation of chemotherapeutic agents, including the taxanes, gemcitabine, and topoisomerase inhibitors such as irinotecan and topotecan, offers the hope of real advances against this malignancy. Irinotecan and topotecan are camptothecin derivatives that are felt to exert their cytotoxic effects by targeting topoisomerase I. It is believed that topoisomerase I inhibitors stabilize a DNA-topoisomerase I cleavable complex, and interactions between this complex and the replication machinery may lead to cell death. There is a significant volume of in vitro and in vivo data demonstrating that these topoisomerase I inhibitors also act as radiosensitizers. Early clinical data with topotecan suggests that it is a more active agent in small-cell lung cancer than it is in NSCLC despite a common mechanism of action with irinotecan. With the increasing data that exist on the improved outcome with concurrent chemoradiation treatment for malignancies including lung cancer and head and neck cancers, there is an impetus to pursue the addition of other drugs that can radiosensitize tumors and further improve local control. Irinotecan is undergoing early clinical trials in the combined modality setting in several different disease sites. This paper will review the in vitro and in vivo data on the ability of irinotecan and topotecan to render tumors more susceptible to ionizing radiation. It will then focus on the experience with both drugs and thoracic radiation in the treatment of NSCLC, in which irinotecan has yielded acceptable toxicity results and response rates in excess of 60% in early trials. It is hoped that newer treatment strategies, such as the combination of radiation and topoisomerase I inhibitors in lung cancer, will have a significant impact on cure rates in the future.