Effect of caffeine on antinociceptive action of ketoprofen in rats

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of (S)-Ketoprofen Co-Administered with Caffeine: A Preclinical Study in Arthritic Rats

The purpose of the present study was to determine whether caffeine modifies the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of (S)-ketoprofen following oral administration in a gout-type pain model. 3.2 mg/kg of (S)-ketoprofen alone and combined with 17.8 mg/kg of caffeine were administered to Wistar rats and plasma levels were determined between 0.5 and 24.0 h. Additionally, antinociception was evaluated based on the protocol of the PIFIR (pain-induced functional impairment in the rat) model before blood sampling between 0.5 and 4.0 h. Significant differences in C_max, AUC_0-24, and AUC_0-∞ values were observed with caffeine administration (p < 0.05). Also, significant differences in E_max, T_max, and AUC_0-4 values were determined when comparing the treatments with and without caffeine (p < 0.05). By relating the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data, a counter-clockwise hysteresis loop was observed regardless of the administration of caffeine. When the relationship between AUCe and AUCp was fitted to the sigmoidal E_max model, a satisfactory correlation was found (R² > 0.99) as well as significant differences in E_max and EC₅₀ values (p < 0.05). With caffeine, E_max and EC₅₀ values changed by 489.5% and 695.4%, respectively. The combination studied represents a convenient alternative for the treatment of pain when considering the advantages offered by using drugs with different mechanisms of action.

Antinociceptive Effect of Racemic Flurbiprofen and Caffeine Co-Administration in an Arthritic Gout-Type Pain in Rats

Preclinical Research Drug combinations are routinely used in the treatment of pain. In drug associations, adjuvants such as caffeine, are employed with different non-steroidal anti-inflammatories drugs (NSAIDs), however, at present does not exist studies showing the effect of the combination of racemic flurbiprofen (rac-Flur) in association with caffeine. The objective of this work was to evaluate the combination of rac-Flur + caffeine oral in arthritic gout-type pain in rats. The antinociceptive effects of the rac-Flur alone and in combination with caffeine were analyzed on a pain-induced functional impairment model in rat. rac-Flur induced a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect and caffeine did not present any effect. The combination of rac-Flur and caffeine achieve a higher percentage of antinociceptive effect compared with the individual administration of rac-Flur. The dose-response curve (DRCs) shows that the combination of rac-Flur (31.6 mg/kg) + caffeine (17.8 mg/kg) exhibited the maximal antinociceptive efficacy (294.0 ± 21.2 area units), while rac-Flur alone (31.6 mg/kg) showed 207.2 ± 35.2 au, thus indicating an increase in efficacy (potentiation). Furthermore, the DRCs of the combinations presented a displacement to the left, indicating a change in the potency. Caffeine is able to increase the effect of rac-Flur in the arthritic gout-type pain in rats. Drug Dev Res 77 : 192-198, 2016.   © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Tramadol and Tramadol+Caffeine Synergism in the Rat Formalin Test Are Mediated by Central Opioid and Serotonergic Mechanisms

Different analgesic combinations with caffeine have shown this drug to be capable of increasing the analgesic effect. Many combinations with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been carried out, but, in regard to opioids, only combinations with morphine and tramadol have been reported. The antinociceptive synergism mechanism of these combinations is not well understood. The purpose of the present study was to determine the participation of spinal and supraspinal opioidergic and serotonergic systems in the synergic effect of the tramadol+caffeine combination in the rat formalin test. At the supraspinal level, the opioid antagonist, naloxone, completely reversed the effect of the drug combination, whereas ketanserin, a 5-HT₂ receptor antagonist, inhibited the effect by 60%; however, ondansetron, a 5-HT₃ receptor antagonist, did not alter the combination effect. When the antagonists were intrathecally administered, there was a significant reduction in all tramadol-caffeine combination effects. With respect to tramadol alone, there was significant participation of the opioid system at the supraspinal level, whereas it was the serotonergic system that participated at the spinal level by means of the two receptors studied. In conclusion, the tramadol+caffeine combination synergically activated the opioid and serotonergic systems at the supraspinal level, as well as at the spinal level, to produce the antinociception.

Opioid Mechanism Involvement in the Synergism Produced by the Combination of Diclofenac and Caffeine in the Formalin Model

Analgesics can be administered in combination with caffeine for improved analgesic effectiveness in a process known as synergism. The mechanisms by which these combinations produce synergism are not yet fully understood. The aim of this study was to analyze whether the administration of diclofenac combined with caffeine produced antinociceptive synergism and whether opioid mechanisms played a role in this event. The formalin model was used to evaluate the antinociception produced by the oral administration of diclofenac, caffeine, or their combination. Opioid involvement was analyzed through intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of naloxone followed by the oral administration of the study drugs. Diclofenac presented a dose-dependent effect, with a mean effective dose (ED₅₀) of 6.7 mg/kg. Caffeine presented an analgesic effect with a 17–36% range. The combination of subeffective doses of each of the two drugs presented the greatest synergism with an effect of 57.7 ± 5.6%. The maximal antinociceptive effect was obtained with the combination of 10.0 mg/kg diclofenac and 1.0 mg/kg of caffeine, with an effect of 76.7 ± 5.6%. The i.c.v. administration of naloxone inhibited the effect of diclofenac, both separately and combined. In conclusion, caffeine produces antinociceptive synergism when administered in combination with diclofenac, and this synergism is partially mediated by opioid mechanisms at the central level.

Adjuvant effect of caffeine on acetylsalicylic acid anti-nociception: Prostaglandin E2 synthesis determination in carrageenan-induced peripheral inflammation in rat

In the present study, we report a synergistic interaction between acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and caffeine (CAF) on the inhibition of nociception in a model of peripheral inflammation in rat; on the contrary no interaction have been found on anti-inflammatory effects and peripheral prostaglandin E2 (PGE-2) synthesis inhibition. Acute inflammation was induced by the subplantar injection of carrageenan into the right hind paw, and the effects of the drugs were evaluated from 0 to 5h. Nociception was assessed using the Randall & Selitto test, and the inflammatory response by plethismometry. Oral administration of ASA (10-400mg/kg) induced dose-related anti-nociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects. On the other hand, oral CAF administration (5-50mg/kg) did not show a dose-related inhibitory effect, neither on the inhibition of nociception nor on the inflammatory response. To analyze a possible interaction between both drugs a dose-response curve to ASA plus a fixed dose of CAF (5mg/kg) was obtained 3h after the injection of carrageenan, when the inflammatory pain peaked. A fixed dose of CAF was able to improve the anti-nociceptive, but not the anti-inflammatory, effects of ASA. We also assessed, by enzyme immunoassay, the effects of the combination on peripheral PGE-2 levels: CAF did not alter the inhibitory effect of ASA on PGE-2 synthesis. Our results corroborate the well-known clinical effects of combining ASA and CAF; on the other hand, we rule out that prostaglandin synthesis inhibition at peripheral sites would be the mechanism responsible of the adjuvant anti-nociceptive effect of CAF.

Methylxanthines and pain

Caffeine, an antagonist of adenosine A(1), A(2A) and A(2B) receptors, is known as an adjuvant analgesic in combination with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and acetaminophen in humans. In preclinical studies, caffeine produces intrinsic antinociceptive effects in several rodent models, and augments the actions of NSAIDs and acetaminophen. Antagonism of adenosine A(2A) and A(2B) receptors, as well as inhibition of cyclooxygenase activity at some sites, may explain intrinsic antinociceptive and adjuvant actions. When combined with morphine, caffeine can augment, inhibit or have no effect depending on the dose, route of administration, nociceptive test and species; inhibition reflects spinal inhibition of adenosine A(1) receptors, while augmentation may reflect the intrinsic effects noted above. Low doses of caffeine given systemically inhibit antinociception by several analgesics (acetaminophen, amitriptyline, oxcarbazepine, cizolirtine), probably reflecting block of a component of action involving adenosine A(1) receptors. Clinical studies have demonstrated adjuvant analgesia, as well as some intrinsic analgesia, in the treatment of headache conditions, but not in the treatment of postoperative pain. Caffeine clearly exhibits complex effects on pain transmission; knowledge of such effects is important for understanding adjuvant analgesia as well as considering situations in which dietary caffeine intake may have an impact on analgesic regimens.

Influence of pharmacologically-induced experimental anxiety on nociception and antinociception in rats

Animal studies reveal that diverse environmental stimuli that generate anxiety-like behaviors also induce antinociception; conversely, clinical data show that pain perception is reduced under anxiolysis. This study was conducted to investigate the influence of pharmacologically induced-anxiety on nociception and antinociception. Experimental anxiety levels were measured using the rat burying behavior test. Diazepam (0, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg, i.p.) or yohimbine (0, 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg, i.p.) were used as anxiolytic or anxiogenic drugs, respectively. To evaluate the influence of different experimental anxiety levels on nociception, the pain-induced functional impairment in the rat (PIFIR model) was used. Nociception was induced by an intra-articular injection of 15% uric acid into the knee joint of the right hind limb. Diazepam or yohimbine were administered 15 min before uric acid and the ability of the rat to use the injured hind limb was recorded. To analyze the influence of different levels of anxiety on the antinociceptive effects produced by acetylsalicylic acid (0, 31, 100 and 310 mg/kg, p.o.); this analgesic was administered 3.5 h after uric acid. Fifteen min before diazepam (2.0 mg/kg) or yohimbine (1.0 mg/kg) were administered. We found that, in the burying behavior test, diazepam and yohimbine produced a dose-dependent decrease or augment in the cumulative time of burying, effects denoting reduced or increased experimental anxiety, respectively. Diazepam or yohimbine, administered alone, was unable to produce nociception. The results showed an influence of anxiety on nociception since a decreased (by diazepam) or increased (by yohimbine) experimental anxiety prevented nociception. Control experiments showed that acetylsalicylic acid did not modify experimental anxiety in the burying behavior test, but effectively reversed the nociception induced by uric acid (15%) in the PIFIR model. Such antinociceptive effect was unmodified by the anxiolytic or anxiogenic actions of diazepam or yohimbine. Data are discussed on the bases of clinical- and animal-studies revealing interactions between anxiety and nociception.

Enhancement of antinociception by co-administration of ibuprofen and caffeine in arthritic rats

It has been observed that caffeine improves antinociceptive efficacy of some non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in several experimental models, however, these effects have been questioned in humans. Controversy in clinical studies may be due to the use of different protocols as well as to high interindividual variability in patient response. In addition, the antinociceptive interaction of ibuprofen+caffeine has not been studied. To assess a possible synergistic antinociceptive interaction, the antinociceptive effects of ibuprofen, and caffeine administered either separately or in combinations were determined in a model of arthritic pain: "Pain-induced functional impairment in the rat (PIFIR model). The antinociceptive efficacies were evaluated using several dose-response curves and time courses. The antinociceptive effects from the combination that produced the greater effect were compared with the maximal antinociceptive effect of either morphine or acetylsalicylic acid alone. The animals were administered with 0.05 ml intra-articular (i.a.) of uric acid to induce nociception. Groups of six rats received either acetylsalicylic acid, morphine, ibuprofen or caffeine, or a combination ibuprofen+caffeine (18 combinations). We report here that caffeine (17.8 and 31.6 mg/kg) is able to potentiate the antinociceptive effect of ibuprofen. This investigation showed that six combinations presented effects of potentiation and twelve combinations only showed antinociceptive effects not different from that of ibuprofen alone. The maximum antinociceptive effect was 270.7+/-12.7 area units (au), produced by ibuprofen 100 mg/kg+caffeine 17.8 mg/kg; this effect was greater than the maximum produced by morphine 17.8 mg/kg (244.7+/-22.9 au) in these experimental conditions. The maximum potentiation was 197 % produced with the combination of ibuprofen 17.8 mg/kg+caffeine 17.8 mg/kg. These results suggest that the antinociceptive effect of ibuprofen was significantly potentiated by doses of caffeine that by themselves are ineffective in this model.