Lichenoid granulomatous papular dermatosis associated with human immunodeficiency virus infection: an immunohistochemical study

Lichenoid granulomatous dermatitis: A case with dramatic desquamation and multiple potential causes

Lichenoid granulomatous dermatitis, also known as giant cell lichenoid dermatitis, represents an uncommon mixed-pattern dermatitis with histopathologic features of interface dermatitis with band-like lymphocytic inflammation of the dermal-epidermal junction, with thinning of the epidermis or lichen planus-like changes, and granulomatous inflammation involving the dermis. Lichenoid granulomatous dermatitis can manifest with a variety of primary lesions and has various clinical associations. We present a challenging clinicopathologic case of lichenoid granulomatous dermatitis in a 58-year-old woman with dramatic cutaneous desquamation in the context of a complex medical history and multiple potential triggers.

Lichenoid reaction with granulomatous stomatitis: A retrospective histologic study of 47 patients

OBJECTIVES

Lichenoid granulomatous reaction can be subcategorized into lichenoid granulomatous dermatitis or lichenoid granulomatous stomatitis. It is described in the literature as demonstrating a band-like lichenoid infiltration with clusters of histiocytic or granuloma formation. In this study, we presented a large case series of lichenoid granulomatous stomatitis including demographics, histological features, and subcategories and compared findings with current literature.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrieved all cases diagnosed with lichenoid reaction with granulomatous inflammation between January 1, 2000, and August 1, 2016, from the University of Florida Oral Pathology Biopsy Service Archives.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients with tissue from 50 biopsy sites were included. The majority of the cases were noted in females (64%) with a mean age of 59 years (range 30-88). Most patients were Caucasian, and the most common sites in descending order were: gingiva, buccal mucosa, vestibule, tongue, lip, palate, and occasional multifocal involvement. Clinical impressions by the treating clinicians included leukoplakia, dysplasia, carcinoma in situ, squamous cell carcinoma, lichen planus, vesiculobullous disease, trauma, and allergy. The histologic features of these cases ranged from lichenoid mucositis with numerous aggregates of histiocytes to well-formed granulomas, in accordance with previous classifications of similar dermatologic lesions. All cases revealed positive CD 68 in the histiocytic infiltrates and were negative for microorganisms utilizing acid-fast bacilli, Grocott methenamine-silver, and periodic acid-Schiff stains.

CONCLUSION

Lichenoid granulomatous disease may be more common than previously reported; however, its etiology remains unknown and patients should be kept under long-term clinical follow-up.

Histologic reactions to cutaneous infections by Mycobacterium haemophilum

Mycobacterium haemophilum is an emerging pathogen in immunocompromised patients. We report the clinical and histologic findings of 16 skin biopsies from 11 patients with culture-proven infections by M. haemophilum. The patients had leukemia or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Ten of them had undergone bone marrow transplantation. When the skin biopsy specimens were taken, a portion of the skin was simultaneously submitted to a microbiology laboratory for cultures. The remaining skin was processed routinely. Acid-fast bacilli were found in 11 of 16 lesions. The number of histologically detectable organisms was typically low: nine biopsies had fewer than three bacilli per 50 oil immersion fields. The most common histologic pattern was a mixed suppurative and granulomatous reaction (7 of 16 biopsies). Four biopsies showed well-formed epithelioid granulomas. Two showed necrosis, one of which was ulcerated. One lesion was a subcutaneous abscess. Two biopsies showed a mixed lichenoid and granulomatous dermatitis. In one of them, the granulomatous reaction was focal and small. One biopsy lacked a granulomatous tissue reaction altogether; it showed an interface dermatitis, a perivascular and periadnexal lymphocytic infiltrate, and necrotizing lymphocytic small vessel vasculitis. A subsequent biopsy from the same patient additionally showed a focal granulomatous reaction. Our observation that infections by M. haemophilum can present with nongranulomatous or pauci-granulomatous reactions without necrosis is of note. Failure to suspect mycobacterial infection in such reactions contributes to probable underreporting of M. haemophilum and to misdiagnoses. Furthermore, our findings emphasize the importance of simultaneous biopsies for culture and histology in immunocompromised patients.