Topical clindamycin versus systemic tetracycline in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa

European S2k guidelines for hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa part 2: Treatment

INTRODUCTION

This second part of the S2k guidelines is an update of the 2015 S1 European guidelines.

OBJECTIVE

These guidelines aim to provide an accepted decision aid for the selection, implementation and assessment of appropriate and sufficient therapy for patients with hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa (HS).

METHODS

The chapters have been selected after a Delphi procedure among the experts/authors. Certain passages have been adopted without changes from the previous version. Potential treatment complications are not included, being beyond the scope of these guidelines.

RESULTS

Since the S1 guidelines publication, validation of new therapeutic approaches has almost completely overhauled the knowledge in the field of HS treatment. Inflammatory nodules/abscesses/draining tunnels are the primary lesions, which enable the classification of the disease severity by new validated tools. In relation to the degree of detectable inflammation, HS is classified into the inflammatory and the predominantly non-inflammatory forms. While the intensity of the inflammatory form can be subdivided by the IHS4 classification in mild, moderate and severe HS and is treated by medication accordingly, the decision on surgical treatment of the predominantly non-inflammatory form is based on the Hurley stage of the affected localization. The effectiveness of oral tetracyclines as an alternative to the oral combination of clindamycin/rifampicin should be noted. The duration of systemic antibiotic therapy can be shortened by a 5-day intravenous clindamycin treatment. Adalimumab, secukinumab and bimekizumab subcutaneous administration has been approved by the EMA for the treatment of moderate-to-severe HS. Various surgical procedures are available for the predominantly non-inflammatory form of the disease. The combination of a medical therapy to reduce inflammation with a surgical procedure to remove irreversible tissue damage is currently considered a holistic therapeutic approach.

CONCLUSIONS

Suitable therapeutic options while considering HS severity in the therapeutic algorithm according to standardized criteria are aimed at ensuring a proper therapy.

Hidradenitis Suppurativa Management with Antibiotics and Systemic Therapies

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease. Despite significant research efforts to discover new therapeutic molecules in recent years, antibiotics and conventional systemic therapies continue to be the indispensable first-line treatments for HS. In this study, we discussed well-known topical and systemic antibiotics and widely used systemic treatments (hormone-modulating therapies, retinoids, and immunosuppressants), and their combinations. Overall, since targeted biologics are not accessible to all patients with HS due to cost, availability, or contraindications, these therapies remain important for treating mild-to-moderate HS and serve as adjunct or bridge treatments in severe cases.

Microbiome Perturbations in Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Skin and gut microbiome perturbations may play a role in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) pathogenesis. Emerging microbiome research has established the complex roles of the skin and gut microbiomes in health maintenance and disease. Perturbations in the HS skin microbiome have been shown to correlate with HS disease severity. HS gut microbiome characterization studies point to a trend in decreased microbial diversity associated with HS. Future research efforts examining microbiome perturbations and their functional implications longitudinally and in the setting of interventions are needed to build on this foundational knowledge.

Australasian hidradenitis suppurativa management guidelines

Hidradenitis Suppurativa is a burdensome inflammatory skin disease with significant quality of life impact. These management guidelines were developed to direct appropriate clinical management in the Australasian context. A systematic review was used for the basis of the consensus guidelines. Thirteen clinical experts were involved in a modified Delphi consensus process to develop the guidelines and treatment algorithms. Overall management strategies include appropriate severity assessment of disease and comorbidities, multimodal therapy with systemic and local treatments, and evidence-based progression along the therapeutic ladder in the event of inadequate response. Sequential monotherapy with antibiotics and/or single agent therapy is discouraged and aggressive treatment of moderate to severe disease to capture the window of opportunity is highly emphasised. Specific considerations in the setting of disease comorbidities, pregnancy and breastfeeding are also addressed. Overall, the complex nature of HS requires a complex and multimodal therapeutic response with medical, physical and surgical therapies to achieve best patient outcomes.

Management of hidradenitis suppurativa in the inpatient setting: a clinical guide

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects the axilla, inframammary folds, buttocks, inner thighs, and anogenital regions. Patients with moderate to severe HS often seek care in the emergency department and may require hospitalization; however, the lack of clear admission criteria and management guidelines presents significant challenges. To address these issues, we conducted a clinical review aimed at hospitalists and consulting dermatologists considering hospital admission for patients experiencing severe HS flares. Admission offers a unique opportunity to optimize care through specialized consultations, pain management, rescue therapy, and surgical planning. Furthermore, multimodal treatments, particularly biologics, are needed to achieve clinical remission in severe disease. Streamlining care during hospitalization for the early initiation of these therapies can significantly improve flare management and overall clinical outcomes for HS patients. This review aims to improve care for HS by providing clear and comprehensive guidance on its management in the inpatient setting.

Taiwanese Dermatological Association (TDA) consensus recommendations for the definition, classification, diagnosis, and management of hidradenitis suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory follicular disease characterized by painful, recurrent, inflamed lesions most commonly occurring in the axillary, inguinal, and anogenital regions. HS can inflict immense physical and psychological impact on patients who suffer from this distressing disease. Management of HS generally requires combining various medical and procedural treatment modalities; however, the disease is often recalcitrant to conventional treatments. In light of recent evidence supporting the effectiveness of biologic agents in the treatment of HS, the Taiwanese Dermatological Association established an expert panel of nine dermatologists to develop consensus statements aimed to provide up-to-date evidence-based guidance in optimizing HS patient management in Taiwan. The recommendations described in the statements were summarized in a management algorithm in terms of general care, topical treatment, systemic treatment, and procedural treatment.

Repurposing Historic Drugs for Neutrophil-Mediated Inflammation in Skin Disorders

Neutrophil-mediated inflammation is a key feature of immune-mediated chronic skin disorders, but the mechanistic understanding of neutrophil involvement in these conditions remains incomplete. Dapsone, colchicine, and tetracyclines are established drugs within the dermatologist's therapeutic armamentarium that are credited with potent anti-neutrophilic effects. Anti-neutrophilic drugs have established themselves as versatile agents in the treatment of a wide range of dermatological conditions. Some of these agents are approved for the management of specific dermatologic conditions, but most of their current uses are off-label and only supported by isolated reports or case series. Their anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties make them particularly valuable in managing auto-immune bullous diseases, neutrophilic dermatoses, eosinophilic dermatoses, interface dermatitis, and granulomatous diseases that are the focus of this review. By inhibiting inflammatory pathways, reducing cytokine production, and modulating immune responses, they contribute significantly to the treatment and management of these complex skin conditions. Their use continues to evolve as our understanding of these diseases deepens, and they remain a cornerstone of dermatological therapy.

Tetracyclines Revisited: Tetracyclines in the Field of Dermatology

BACKGROUND

Tetracyclines are a class of broad-spectrum antibiotics favored by dermatologists. Over the last decade, the clinical efficacy of tetracyclines has expanded into various dermatoses.

SUMMARY

This review tries to encompass the possible indications of tetracycline in the field of dermatology and possible mechanisms of action. This comprehensive review encompasses all possible indications of tetracyclines besides acne vulgaris and rosacea: hidradenitis suppurativa, autoimmune bullous dermatoses, vitiligo, alopecia, prurigo pigmentosa, granulomatous dermatoses, Kaposi's sarcoma, cold urticaria, atopic dermatitis, scrub typhus, scarring, and miscellaneous dermatoses. We also focus on the recently approved sarecycline, a third-generation narrow-spectrum tetracycline, and its clinical efficacy and potential impact on the microbiome. Our review provides a better understanding of this extremely familiar drug class and encourages its use in a wider spectrum of dermatologic diseases and symptoms.

KEY MESSAGES

This study comprehensively reviewed the current literature on potential indications of tetracyclines in the field of dermatology.

Assessing the Role of Adalimumab in Treating Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Findings from a Retrospective Study at a Reference Center

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition characterized by inflammatory lesions, often leading to scarring. Managing HS can be difficult, requiring biological therapy, specifically adalimumab.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on patients diagnosed with HS and treated with the TNF-α inhibitor adalimumab. Data from 21 patients were included in this study. International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4); Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI); pain intensity according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS); and number of nodules, abscesses, and fistulas were assessed.

RESULTS

Notably, 47.62% of patients achieved Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response. The mean number of inflamed nodules decreased from 5.62 ± 4.12 to 3 ± 3.46, abscesses decreased from 1.76 ± 2.63 to 0.81 ± 1.4, and fistulas decreased from 2.62 ± 1.86 to 2 ± 1.9 (p < 0.05). The IHS4 score decreased from 19 ± 10.78 to 12.62 ± 11.13 (p = 0.001), DLQI from 15.76 ± 7.73 to 7.43 ± 7.76 (p < 0.001), and VAS from 6.69 ± 1.56 to 3.64 ± 2.65 (p < 0.001). There was a significant difference in the baseline IHS4 scores between patients who had prior surgery with a mean score of 23.86 ± 9.4 versus non-surgical patients with a mean IHS4 score of 9.29 ± 5.53 (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

About half of HS patients responded positively to adalimumab treatment; the use of the drug reduces inflammatory lesions, and pain, and improves quality of life.

Comorbidities, Clinical Presentation, Subtypes, and Treatment of HS Patients in Lithuania

Background: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a persistent, recurring skin inflammatory condition linked to various comorbidities. Management involves antibiotics, hormone therapy, immune-modulating drugs, surgery, and treatment of comorbidities. The objectives of the study were to assess the comorbidities, clinical presentation subtypes, and applied treatment of patients with HS. Methods: Patients with HS who visited the Centre of Dermatovenereology at Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos in Lithuania underwent evaluation based on the guidelines of the European Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation Registry questionnaire. Results: The study included 49 patients, and 61.22% (n = 30) had comorbidities. A strong positive correlation was found between a family history of inflammatory diseases (69.38% (n = 34)) and the severity of HS according to Hurley stage (r = 0.71 p < 0.05). A statistically significant correlation (r = 0.944, p = 0.02) was found between metabolic comorbidities and Hurley stage. Patients on biologic treatment had a mean IHS4 of 7.38 at the beginning of treatment and 3.22 at follow-up (p < 0.05). For patients not on biologics, the initial IHS4 score was 6.21 and 5.42 at follow-up (p > 0.05). Conclusions: A family history of inflammatory diseases and metabolic comorbidities showed a strong correlation with HS severity. Treatment with biologics showed significant improvement in HS scores compared to systemic antibiotics.

[Hidradenitis suppurativa]

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin and systemic disease that is associated with considerable discomfort and a significant reduction in the quality of life. Despite a significantly increased understanding of the disease, the diagnosis is still delayed for many years. Delayed patient access to suitable treatment often leads to disease progression with increased surgical interventions and the occurrence of possible comorbidities. In recent years, there has been an improved understanding of the pathophysiology and, as a result the authorization of modern therapeutic agents for HS. The treatment of HS is based on three treatment pillars: surgery, antibiotics and biologics. Additionally, risk factors, such as smoking and obesity should be positively influenced. Knowledge of comorbidities and their interdisciplinary treatment is important for the individualized care of patients.

Topical and Intralesional Therapies for Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Topical and intralesional (IL) treatments may be considered the first-line therapy in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS); however, the evidence supporting their use is limited. The aim of our review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of topical and IL treatments in patients with HS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We designed a systematic review of the current medical literature available following the PICO(T) method. And including all types of studies (Study type [T]) of individuals with HS of any sex, age, and ethnicity (Population [P]) who received any topical or IL treatment for HS (Intervention [I]) compared to placebo, other treatments, or no treatment at all (Comparator [C]), and reported efficacy and/or safety outcomes (Outcomes [O]). Two outcomes were defined: quality of life and the no. of patients with, at least, one adverse event. The search was conducted in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Embase databases; study selection was performed based on pre-defined criteria. The risk of bias was determined in each study.

RESULTS

We obtained a total of 11,363 references, 31 of which met the inclusion criteria. These studies included 1143 patients with HS, 62% of whom were women. A total of 10, 8, 6, 2, and 5 studies, respectively, evaluated the use of photodynamic therapy (PDT), glucocorticoids, resorcinol, topical antibiotics, and other interventions. Most articles were case series (n=25), with only five randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and one cohort study. RCTs showed improvement in disease activity with topical clindamycin and botulinum toxin (BTX) vs placebo, and PDT with methylene blue (MB) niosomal vs free MB; however, intralesional triamcinolone acetonide was not superior to placebo. The risk of bias was low in three RCTs and high in two RCTs.

CONCLUSION

The quality of evidence supporting the use of topical, or IL treatments is low. However, it supports the use of topical clindamycin, PDT, and BTX. Well-designed RCTs with standardized outcomes and homogeneous populations of patients and lesions are needed to support decision-making in the routine clinical practice.

Topical and Intralesional Therapies for Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Topical and intralesional (IL) treatments may be considered the first-line therapy in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS); however, the evidence supporting their use is limited. The aim of our review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of topical and IL treatments in patients with HS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We designed a systematic review of the current medical literature available following the PICO(T) method. And including all types of studies (Study type [T]) of individuals with HS of any sex, age, and ethnicity (Population [P]) who received any topical or IL treatment for HS (Intervention [I]) compared to placebo, other treatments, or no treatment at all (Comparator [C]), and reported efficacy and/or safety outcomes (Outcomes [O]). Two outcomes were defined: quality of life and the no. of patients with, at least, one adverse event. The search was conducted in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases; study selection was performed based on pre-defined criteria. The risk of bias was determined in each study.

RESULTS

We obtained a total of 11,363 references, 31 of which met the inclusion criteria. These studies included 1143 patients with HS, 62% of whom were women. A total of 10, 8, 6, 2, and 5 studies, respectively, evaluated the use of photodynamic therapy (PDT), glucocorticoids, resorcinol, topical antibiotics, and other interventions. Most articles were case series (n=25), with only five randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and one cohort study. RCTs showed improvement in disease activity with topical clindamycin and botulinum toxin (BTX) vs placebo, and PDT with methylene blue (MB) niosomal vs free MB; however, intralesional triamcinolone acetonide was not superior to placebo. The risk of bias was low in three RCTs and high in two RCTs.

CONCLUSION

The quality of evidence supporting the use of topical, or IL treatments is low. However, it supports the use of topical clindamycin, PDT, and BTX. Well-designed RCTs with standardized outcomes and homogeneous populations of patients and lesions are needed to support decision-making in the routine clinical practice.

Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Evaluation Study (THESEUS): a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, painful disease affecting flexures and other skin regions, producing nodules, abscesses and skin tunnels. Laser treatment targeting hair follicles and deroofing of skin tunnels are standard HS interventions in some countries but are rarely offered in the UK.

OBJECTIVES

To describe current UK HS management pathways and influencing factors to inform the design of future randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

THESEUS was a nonrandomized 12-month prospective cohort study set in 10 UK hospitals offering five interventions: oral doxycycline 200 mg daily; oral clindamycin and rifampicin both 300 mg twice daily for 10 weeks, extended for longer in some cases; laser treatment targeting hair follicles; deroofing; and conventional surgery. The primary outcome was the combination of clinician-assessed eligibility and participant hypothetical willingness to receive each intervention. The secondary outcomes were the proportion of participants selecting each intervention as their final treatment option; the proportion who switch treatments; treatment fidelity; and attrition rates. THESEUS was prospectively registered on the ISRCTN registry: ISRCTN69985145.

RESULTS

The recruitment target of 150 participants was met after 18 months, in July 2021, with two pauses due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Baseline demographics reflected the HS secondary care population: average age 36 years, 81% female, 20% non-White, 64% current or ex-smokers, 86% body mass index ≥ 25, 68% with moderate disease, 19% with severe disease and 13% with mild disease. Laser was the intervention with the highest proportion (69%) of participants eligible and willing to receive treatment, then deroofing (58%), conventional surgery (54%), clindamycin and rifampicin (44%), and doxycycline (37%). Laser was ranked first choice by the greatest proportion of participants (41%). Attrition rates were 11% and 17% after 3 and 6 months, respectively. Concordance with doxycycline was 52% after 3 months due to lack of efficacy, participant choice and adverse effects. Delays with procedural interventions were common, with only 43% and 26% of participants starting laser and deroofing, respectively, after 3 months. Uptake of conventional surgery was too small to characterize the intervention. Switching treatment was uncommon and there were no serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

THESEUS has established laser treatment and deroofing for HS in the UK and demonstrated their popularity with patients and clinicians for future RCTs.

Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Evaluation Study: the THESEUS prospective cohort study

Background

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterised by recurrent inflammatory lesions and skin tunnels in flexural sites such as the axilla. Deroofing of skin tunnels and laser treatment are standard hidradenitis suppurativa interventions in some countries but not yet introduced in the United Kingdom.

Objective

To understand current hidradenitis suppurativa management pathways and what influences treatment choices to inform the design of future randomised controlled trials.

Design

Prospective 12-month observational cohort study, including five treatment options, with nested qualitative interviews and an end-of-study consensus workshop.

Setting

Ten United Kingdom hospitals with recruitment led by dermatology and plastic surgery departments.

Participants

Adults with active hidradenitis suppurativa of any severity not adequately controlled by current treatment.

Interventions

Oral doxycycline 200 mg once daily; oral clindamycin and rifampicin, both 300 mg twice daily for 10 weeks initially; laser treatment targeting the hair follicle (neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet or alexandrite); deroofing; and conventional surgery.

Main outcome measures

Primary outcome was the proportion of participants who are eligible, and hypothetically willing, to use the different treatment options. Secondary outcomes included proportion of participants choosing each of the study interventions, with reasons for their choices; proportion of participants who switched treatments; treatment fidelity; loss to follow-up rates over 12 months; and efficacy outcome estimates to inform outcome measure instrument responsiveness.

Results

Between February 2020 and July 2021, 151 participants were recruited, with two pauses due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Follow-up rates were 89% and 83% after 3 and 6 months, decreasing to 70% and 44% at 9 and 12 months, respectively, because pandemic recruitment delays prevented all participants reaching their final review. Baseline demographics included an average age of 36 years, 81% female, 20% black, Asian or Caribbean, 64% current or ex-smokers and 86% with a raised body mass index. Some 69% had moderate disease, 19% severe disease and 13% mild disease. Regarding the study's primary outcome, laser treatment was the intervention with the highest proportion (69%) of participants who were eligible and hypothetically willing to receive treatment, followed by deroofing (58%), conventional surgery (54%), the combination of oral clindamycin and rifampicin (44%) and doxycycline (37%). Considering participant willingness in isolation, laser was ranked first choice by the greatest proportion (41%) of participants. The cohort study and qualitative study demonstrated that participant willingness to receive treatment was strongly influenced by their clinician. Fidelity to oral doxycycline was only 52% after 3 months due to lack of effectiveness, participant preference and adverse effects. Delays receiving procedural interventions were common, with only 43% and 26% of participants commencing laser therapy and deroofing, respectively, after 3 months. Treatment switching was uncommon and there were no serious adverse events. Daily pain score text messages were initiated in 110 participants. Daily responses reduced over time with greatest concordance during the first 14 days.

Limitations

It was not possible to characterise conventional surgery due to a low number of participants.

Conclusion

The Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Evaluation Study established deroofing and laser treatment for hidradenitis suppurativa in the United Kingdom and developed a network of 10 sites for subsequent hidradenitis suppurativa randomised controlled trials.

Future work

The consensus workshop prioritised laser treatment and deroofing as interventions for future randomised controlled trials, in some cases combined with drug treatment.

Trial registration

This trial is registered as ISRCTN69985145.

Funding

This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 12/35/64) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 27, No. 30. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

What should a surgeon know about hidradenitis suppurativa?

Otherwise known as Verneuil's disease, hidradenitis suppurative (HS) is a severe dermatosis of heterogeneous appearance affecting 1% of the population. Its pathophysiology is multifactorial, involving genetic predisposition, inflammatory disorder and environmental elements. Its diagnosis is based on the association of three clinical characteristics: characteristic lesions, typical localizations, and the chronic and recurrent nature of the lesions. Given its diversified aspects, diagnosis can be difficult to achieve. As its manifestations often include abscesses, it is important for the surgeon to know how to detect this pathology. The development of biologics has improved treatment of this disease, treatment that necessitates a multidisciplinary medical and surgical approach involving dermatologists and proctologists as well as surgeons. The objective of this report is to synthesize what a surgeon will need to know so as effectively treat HS patients.

Hidradenitis Suppurativa in Children and Adolescents: An Update on Pharmacologic Treatment Options

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, recurrent, inflammatory skin condition that manifests as painful, deep-seated, inflamed nodules and abscesses in the axillary, groin, perianal, perineal, and inframammary regions. The associated pain, malodour, and disfigurement contribute to its profound negative impact on psychosocial spheres and overall quality of life in affected individuals. Although the symptoms of HS classically begin in the second or third decade of life, HS affects children and adolescents as well. Despite this, there are limited pediatric data on treatment, which are largely based on expert opinion, extrapolation of efficacy data in adults with HS, and safety information from medication use in other pediatric diseases. On this basis, there exist several pharmacological modalities in the treatment of children and adolescents with HS including topical therapies, systemic therapies, and biologics. The goals of this review article are to: (1) review the efficacy of different pharmacological treatment modalities in children and adolescents with HS, and (2) review the safety and monitoring considerations of the different treatment options in children and adolescents with HS.

Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Literature Review Comparing Current Therapeutic Modalities

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a disease with a poor prognosis, often misinterpreted as an infection, with the highest impact on the patient's quality of life among all the assessed dermatological diseases. The main aim of this study was to compare various therapeutic interventions that are currently available for the treatment of HS. The pathogenesis of HS is not well understood, but it is mostly multifactorial involving a number of factors like genetic factors, androgens, local immunity, microflora, smoking, and obesity. Despite limited evidence on their effectiveness, topical antibiotics and antiseptics are commonly employed. Due to the colonization of bacteria and the presence of biofilms in the sinus tracts formed by HS lesions, systemic antibiotics are commonly employed as the primary form of therapy. In females with HS who experience menstrual flares or display symptoms of polycystic ovary syndrome, hormonal agents are often considered to be a viable and effective therapeutic option. At present, the sole treatment approved by both the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for addressing moderate to severe HS is adalimumab, an antibody that targets tumor necrosis factor alpha. Many surgical procedures in the management of HS aim to address inflammation by eliminating the affected folliculo-pilosebaceous unit, sinus tracts, and associated debris to impede further progression and scarring. HS continues to pose a considerable treatment challenge, necessitating a comprehensive approach for patients. However, the available evidence for most of these treatments is limited, indicating the need for more extensive research to identify the most effective interventions for managing HS.

Clinical-Epidemiological Characteristics of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Retrospective Cohort Study from a Tertiary Care Centre in Northern Israel

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is characterised by inflamed lesions that typically appear in apocrine-rich flexural areas. Although studies have reported clinical and epidemiological data from western countries, data from the Middle East are scarce. The aim of this study is to characterise the differences in the clinical characteristics of patients with HS of Arab and Jewish ancestry and review the clinical characteristics, the course of the disease, the comorbidities, and the response to treatment.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study. We collected clinical and demographic data from patient files between 2015-2018 at the Rambam Healthcare Campus dermatology clinic-a tertiary hospital located in the north of Israel. Our results were compared to those of a previously published Israeli control group registered in Clalit Health Services.

RESULTS

Of the 164 patients with HS, 96 (58.5%) were men and 68 (41.5%) were women. The average age at diagnosis was 27.5 years and the average latency between the onset and diagnosis of the disease was 4 years. We found a higher adjusted prevalence of HS in Arab patients (56%) than in their Jewish counterparts (44%). Gender, smoking, and obesity, as well as axilla and buttock lesions, were risk factors for severe HS, with no differences between ethnicities. No differences were documented in comorbidities and in response to adalimumab, with a high overall response rate of 83%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings revealed differences between Arab and Jewish patients with HS in terms of incidence and gender predominance, while no differences were documented in comorbidities and response to adalimumab.

Systemic Antibiotic Therapy in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Review on Treatment Landscape and Current Issues

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, recurrent, and inflammatory skin disease characterized by painful, deep-seated, nodules, abscesses, and sinus tracts in sensitive areas of the body, including axillary, inguinal, and anogenital regions. Antibiotics represent the first-line pharmacological treatment of HS because of their anti-inflammatory properties and antimicrobial effects. This narrative review summarizes the most significant current issues on the role of systemic antibiotics in the management of HS, critically analyzing the main limits of their use (antibiotic resistance and toxicity). Although, in the last decades, several cytokines have been implicated in the pathomechanism of HS and the research on the use of novel biologic agents in HS has been intensified, antibiotics remain a valid therapeutic approach. Future challenges regarding antibiotic therapy in HS comprise their use in association with biologics in the management of acute flare or as a bridge therapy to surgery.

Cervicofacial hidradenitis suppurativa: A case report and literature review

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the apocrine glands primarily affecting the axillae, perineum, and inframammary regions. It is characterized by painful, inflamed cutaneous lesions causing nodules, sinus tracts, and abscesses. Cervicofacial HS is an atypical presentation of HS in the head and neck region and is scarcely reported in the literature. We present a 34-year-old male who developed a large facial swelling overlying the left inferior mandibular border. Management included surgical incision and drainage, antibiotic therapy, followed by infliximab (Remicade). The purpose of this case report was to highlight the presentation, pathophysiology, interdisciplinary approach to treatment and follow-up of patients with cervicofacial HS, and finally, review the cervicofacial HS literature.

Topical Antibiotic Treatment in Dermatology

Many indications in dermatology can be effectively managed with topical antibiotics, including acne vulgaris, wound infections, secondarily infected dermatitis, and impetigo. Dermatologists must be familiar with the wide spectrum of topical antibiotics available, including indications, mechanisms of action, adverse events, and spectra of activity. Dermatologists must also keep antibiotic resistance in mind when utilizing these medications. Due to the widespread use of topical antibiotics and their importance in dermatology, a literature review was performed using a systematic search of PubMed and Google Scholar with the terms topical antibiotics, skin infections, dermatology, antimicrobials, and inflammatory dermatoses to identify English-language articles published between 1965-2022 from any country. Relevant publications were manually reviewed for additional content. The following literature review will summarize the common topical antibiotics used in dermatology.

Rifampin-moxifloxacin-metronidazole combination therapy for severe Hurley stage 1 hidradenitis suppurativa: prospective short-term trial and 1-year follow-up in 28 consecutive patients

BACKGROUND

Severe Hurley stage 1 hidradenitis suppurativa (HS1) is a difficult-to-treat form of the disease.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and tolerance of the oral combination of rifampin (10 mg/kg once daily)/moxifloxacin (400 mg once daily)/metronidazole (250-500 mg 3 times daily) (RMoM) treatment strategy in patients with severe HS1.

METHODS

Prospective, open-label, noncomparative cohort study in 28 consecutive patients. Nineteen patients were treated for 6 weeks by RMoM, followed by 4 weeks of rifampin/moxifloxacin alone, then by cotrimoxazole after remission. Moxifloxacin was replaced by pristinamycin (1 g 3 times daily) in 9 patients because of contraindications or intolerance. The primary endpoint was a Sartorius score of 0 (clinical remission) at week 12.

RESULTS

The median Sartorius score dropped from 14 to 0 (P = 6 × 10^-6) at week 12, with 75% of patients reaching clinical remission. A low initial Sartorius score was a prognosis factor for clinical remission (P = .049). The main adverse effects were mild gastrointestinal discomfort, mucosal candidiasis, and asthenia. At 1 year of follow-up, the median number of flares dropped from 21/year to 1 (P = 1 × 10^-5).

LIMITATIONS

Small, monocentric, noncontrolled study.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete and prolonged remission can be obtained in severe HS1 by using targeted antimicrobial treatments.

Current Medical and Surgical Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa-A Comprehensive Review

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease presenting with recurrent inflammatory lesions in intertriginous body regions. HS has a pronounced impact on patients' quality of life and is associated with a variety of comorbidities. Treatment of HS is often complex, requiring an individual approach with medical and surgical treatments available. However, especially in moderate-to-severe HS, there is an urgent need for new treatment approaches. In recent years, increased research has led to the identification of new potential therapeutic targets. This review aims to give a comprehensive and practical overview of current treatment options for HS. Furthermore, the clinically most advanced novel treatment approaches will be discussed.

Efficacy of Subantimicrobial, Modified-Release Doxycycline Compared to Regular-Release Doxycycline for the Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Introduction

Antibiotics are frequently used to treat hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), but the evidence-based literature available on their use is limited. Considering that HS is not primarily an infectious disease, we sought to evaluate the efficacy of subantimicrobial, modified-release doxycycline (MR-DC) compared to regular-release doxycycline (RR-DC) for the treatment of HS.

Materials and Methods

Patients were randomly assigned to receive treatment with either MR-DC 40 mg once daily or RR-DC 100 mg twice daily for a period of 12 weeks. The treatment efficacy was assessed after 12 weeks of treatment using the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4), the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR).

Results

A total of 49 patients (25 in the MR-DC group and 24 in the RR-DC group) were included in the study. A statistically significant (p < 0.05) reduction of IHS4 and DLQI was observed in both groups at week 12. HiSCR was achieved by 64% of patients receiving MR-DC and 60% of those receiving RR-DC.

Conclusion

MR-DC demonstrated comparable efficacy to RR-DC in the treatment of HS. MR-DC may serve as a valuable alternative to other antibiotic regimes, considering its anti-inflammatory properties and its lower potential to induce antibiotic resistance.

The road to biologics in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: a nationwide drug utilization study

BACKGROUND

Prolonged systemic antibiotic treatment is often a part of management of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Although biologic therapies are now available, the patient's treatment journey leading to biologic therapy is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To examine treatment patterns and duration of systemic treatment use in patients with HS preceding biologic therapy.

METHODS

We identified all patients with HS receiving treatment with biologics in the Danish National Patient Registry from 2010 to 2018 and extracted their entire prescription history of specific systemic treatments from the Danish National Prescription Registry since its inception in 1995. The patients' treatment journeys are graphically displayed through Sankey diagrams and box plots generated to show temporal distributions. Descriptive patient characteristics were presented as frequencies with percentages for categorical variables and as means with SDs or medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs) for continuous variables.

RESULTS

A total of 225 patients with HS were included. Patients had most frequently been treated with penicillin (n = 214; 95·1%), dicloxacillin (n = 194; 86·2%), tetracycline (n = 145; 64·4%) and rifampicin/clindamycin (n = 111; 49·3%), as well as the retinoids isotretinoin and acitretin, and dapsone. Prior to biologic therapy, patients received a mean of 4·0 (SD 1·3) different systemic therapies, across a mean of 16·9 (SD 11·3) different treatment series. The mean time from first systemic therapy until biologic therapy was initiated was 15·3 (SD 5·1) years [8·2 (SD 5·9) years when excluding penicillin and dicloxacillin].

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with HS who receive biologic therapy have long preceding treatment histories with multiple drug classes and treatment series, many of which are supported by relatively weak evidence in HS. Delay in the initiation of biologic therapy may represent a missed opportunity to prevent disease progression. What is already known about this topic? The treatment journey leading to biologic therapy in patients with HS has not previously been investigated. What does this study add? Our data from 225 patients with HS illustrate that patients who receive biologic therapy have long preceding treatment histories with multiple drug classes and treatment series, many of which are supported by relatively weak evidence in HS.

Top 100 most-cited publications in hidradenitis suppurativa: An updated bibliometric analysis

Background

Over the last several decades, our understanding of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) has improved considerably, thereby enhancing our ability to clinically diagnose and treat the disease.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to identify and analyze the top 100 most-cited publications related to HS to update bibliometric information on HS.

Materials and methods

We used the Web of Science database to identify reports on hidradenitis suppurativa. Data from the 100 most-cited publications were extracted and analyzed.

Results

The citation number of the top 100 most-cited articles was 89-532 (mean, 153.51), with the most productive periods being from years 2007 to 2016. Most publications originated from the British Journal of Dermatology and the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. The 100 articles originated from 18 countries, with Denmark being the most productive country, followed by the United States (17), England (14), and Germany (12). Jemec GB, from the University of Copenhagen, had 32 citations and was the most frequently identified author. The 100 articles encompassed several fields of research as follows: pathogenesis (18%), pathophysiology (7%), epidemiology (14%), clinical diagnosis and features (16%), treatment (25%), comorbidity (10%), and others (10%). In total, 11 reviews, three guidelines, and 86 original articles (nine randomized clinical trials) were included.

Conclusion

Through this bibliometric analysis, we aimed to indicate a series of intellectual landmark publications that offer us critical reviews, guidelines, and original articles, which highlight the immense level of progress achieved in the field of HS.

Practical Guidelines for Managing Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa: An Update

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease that is characterized by the formation of comedones, papules, nodules, abscesses and sinus tracts in the axillary, inframammary, groin, and gluteal areas. Up to 3.8% of the Canadian population has HS, though due to a lack of awareness of HS, many patients are initially misdiagnosed and do not receive adequate treatment early on in the disease course. Once a diagnosis of HS is made, developing an effective management plan can be a dilemma for many providers. There is significant variability in response to any given therapy within the HS patient population and many HS patients have other medical comorbidities which must be taken into consideration. The aim of this review is to provide a practical approach for all healthcare providers to diagnose and manage HS and its associated comorbidities. A sample electronic medical record template for HS management was developed by the Canadian Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation Executive Board and is intended for use in clinical settings. This will help to increase collaboration between primary healthcare providers, dermatologists, and other medical specialists and ultimately improve the quality of care that HS patients receive.

Therapeutic Options for Perifolliculitis Capitis Abscedens et Suffodens: A Review

Perifolliculitis capitis abscedens et suffodiens (PCAS) is a chronic skin inflammatory disease characterized by relapsing folliculitis and painful, fluctuant abscesses, sinus tracts and scars. The treatment of PCAS is challenging and clinical practice varies a lot, and how to choose the best treatment for PCAS is a real problem for clinicians. We reviewed articles providing treatment options for patients with PCAS in different databases. Dermatologists may find this review helpful to meet the challenges of PCAS management, but there is still a lack of authoritative guidelines. In the future, more robust randomized control trials are needed to determine the best treatment for PCAS. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

LAight® Therapy Is an Effective Treatment Option to Maintain Long-Term Remission of Hurley I and II Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Results from Period B of RELIEVE, a Multicenter Randomized, Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic, inflammatory, burdensome skin disease where current first-line treatments are limited to topical and/or systemic antibiotics which cannot be applied for long-term disease management. Period B of the RELIEVE study analyzes whether LAight® therapy can sustain or even increase remission after a first topical antibiotic treatment cycle.

METHODS

The RELIEVE study was performed as a two-period multicenter randomized controlled trial with blinded assessment. For period A from week 0 to week 16, the 88 participating Hurley I and II patients were randomized to either a group receiving topical clindamycin 1% solution combined with 8 additional bi-weekly treatments with LAight® therapy (group TC + L) or a group which was treated with topical clindamycin 1% solution only (group TC). After 16 weeks, patients entered open-label period B and both groups were treated exclusively with LAight® therapy for an additional 16 weeks (8 sessions, group TC + L/L and group TC/L).

RESULTS

In total, 88 patients were enrolled in RELIEVE. Seventy-eight patients entered period B; 39 belonged to group TC + L/L and 39 to group TC/L. The IHS4-response at the start of period B was 62% (group TC + L/L) and 33% (group TC + L). During the 16 weeks of additional monotherapy with LAight, in both groups >90% of patients who responded to therapy in period A maintained their IHS4-response at week 32. IHS4 response rates continued to rise up to 79% of the TC + L/L group and up to 71% of the TC/L group during period B at week 32. Achievement of HiSCR and certain patient reported outcomes confirmed primary endpoint results.

CONCLUSION

LAight® therapy is an effective approved therapy option for Hurley I and II HS that can be used continuously to maintain treatment success. During 16 weeks of follow-up in period B, over 90% of patients with response after period A maintained their treatment outcome, while more than 60% of prior nonresponders gained response. The fact that LAight® therapy can be applied continuously, is very effective and is well tolerated makes it a valuable treatment tool in the design of HS long-term treatment modalities.

Biologics and Small Molecule Inhibitors for Treating Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The treatment guidelines for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) vary among different countries, and several biologics and small molecule inhibitors have been tested for treating moderate-to-severe HS over the past few years. However, treatment guidelines for HS vary among different countries.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to exam the efficacy and serious adverse events (SAEs) of biologics and small-molecule inhibitors in treating moderate-to-severe HS. Binary outcomes were presented as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

We included 16 RCTs with a total of 2076 participants on nine biologics and three small-molecule inhibitors for treating moderate-to-severe HS, including adalimumab, anakinra, apremilast, avacopan, bimekizumab, CJM112, etanercept, guselkumab, IFX-1, INCB054707, infliximab, and MABp1. The meta-analysis revealed only adalimumab (RR 1.77, 95% CI, 1.44-2.17) and bimekizumab (RR 2.25, 95% CI, 1.03-4.92) achieved significant improvement on hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response (HiSCR), and adalimumab was superior to placebo in achieving dermatology life quality index (DLQI) 0/1 (RR 3.97; 95% CI, 1.70-9.28). No increase in SAEs was found for all included active treatments when compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Adalimumab and bimekizumab are the only two biologics effective in achieving HiSCR with acceptable safety profile, whereas adalimumab is the only biologic effective in achieving DLQI 0/1.

New and Emerging Targeted Therapies for Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, recurrent, inflammatory skin disease deriving from the hair follicles. The formation of inflammatory nodules, abscesses, fistulas, and sinus tracts is characterized by a large inflow of key pro-inflammatory mediators, such as IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-1, IL-17, and IL-12/23. Adalimumab is currently the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)- and European Medicines Agency (EMA)-approved biologic therapy for moderate to severe HS in adults and adolescents. However, the long-term effectiveness of this TNF-α inhibitor in HS patients has shown to be highly variable. This review aims to review the evidence for emerging therapies that target the main pro-inflammatory cytokines in HS pathogenesis. A review of the literature was conducted, using the PubMed and Google Scholar repositories, as well as Clinicaltrials.gov. Presently, the most promising biologics in phase III trials are anti-IL-17 antibodies, secukinumab, and bimekizumab. Furthermore, an anti-IL-1 biologic, bermekimab, is currently in phase II trials, and shows encouraging results. Overall, the clinical efficacies of all new targeted therapies published up to this point are limited. More studies need to be performed to clarify the precise molecular pathology, and assess the efficacy of biological therapies for HS.

Dapsone in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory, recurrent disease, usually presenting after puberty with inflammatory lesions that mainly affect the apocrine gland-bearing areas of the body, most commonly the axillary, inguinal and anogenital regions. The treatment of HS is associated with certain challenges due to intrinsic resistance to various treatments and the presence of comorbidities and complications. The antibiotic dapsone is an established treatment for HS, but the current evidence base is limited. The aim of this review is to systematically review the literature on the efficacy of dapsone in the treatment of HS.

METHODS

The Cochrane, PubMed and CINAHL databases were searched for relevant articles to be included in the systematic review.

RESULTS

A total of seven studies, with a cumulative patient population of 135 patients, were included. Of these 135 patients, 62.2% demonstrated various degrees of improvement following treatment. However, as only three of the seven studies used dapsone monotherapy it is difficult to assess the effectiveness of dapsone because the benefits observed may be due to concurrently administered treatment.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the quality of evidence supporting the use of dapsone is weak. However, it is a well established treatment recommended in current, various national guidelines. There is a crucial need for well-designed randomized controlled trials to support its usage.

Patient Impressions and Outcomes After Clinic-Based Hidradenitis Suppurativa Surgery

IMPORTANCE

Surgical intervention is frequently needed to treat hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Patient satisfaction is high based on previous studies, but reports of patient impressions of clinic-based operative experiences and postoperative recovery are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize patient impressions, outcomes, and recovery time after clinic-based surgical treatment of HS and examine patient characteristics associated with outcomes.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This retrospective cohort study included patients 12 years or older who underwent clinic-based surgical procedures for treatment of HS at a single subspecialty HS clinic at the University of North Carolina Department of Dermatology from April 2014 to December 2018. Data analysis was performed from January to September 2021.

EXPOSURES

Clinic-based deroofing and excisional procedures performed as part of routine care.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcomes were patient-reported recurrence of HS at the site of surgery, patient satisfaction with the procedures and outcomes, and patient-reported pain and recovery associated with surgery obtained from electronic medical record review and patient questionnaires.

RESULTS

Outcomes of 194 procedures for 78 patients (65 [83%] female; mean [SD] age, 35.1 [12.1] years) were analyzed. Self-reported rate of recurrence was 41% (79 procedures). Despite recurrence, most patients (148 procedures [76%]) were very satisfied with their surgical results. The median number of missed days of work or school was 2 (IQR, 1-7 days), and the median number of days until return to normal activity was 10 (IQR, 3-14 days). In addition, for 126 of the 194 procedures (65%), patients stated that pain during an HS flare was worse than pain during surgical recovery.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study, patients reported high rates of satisfaction with clinic-based HS surgery. Recovery was typically rapid, with most patients rating postsurgical pain as less severe than their HS pain.

Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Host-Microbe and Immune Pathogenesis Underlie Important Future Directions

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory disease of the skin with a chronic, relapsing-remitting course. The pathogenesis of the disease is poorly understood and involves multiple factors, including genetics, environment, host-microbe interactions, and immune dysregulation. In particular, the composition of the cutaneous microbiome shifts as the disease progresses, although it is unclear whether this is a primary or secondary process. Trials with immunomodulatory therapy elucidate the role of specific immune pathways and cytokine signaling in disease mechanism, such as TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-12, IL-17, IL-23, and complement. Future studies should continue examining the causes of and contributing factors to microbial changes and immune dysregulation in HS pathogenesis.

The Development of Third-Generation Tetracycline Antibiotics and New Perspectives

The tetracycline antibiotic class has acquired new valuable members due to the optimisation of the chemical structure. The first modern tetracycline introduced into therapy was tigecycline, followed by omadacycline, eravacycline, and sarecycline (the third generation). Structural and physicochemical key elements which led to the discovery of modern tetracyclines are approached. Thus, several chemical subgroups are distinguished, such as glycylcyclines, aminomethylcyclines, and fluorocyclines, which have excellent development potential. The antibacterial spectrum comprises several resistant bacteria, including those resistant to old tetracyclines. Sarecycline, a narrow-spectrum tetracycline, is notable for being very effective against Cutinebacterium acnes. The mechanism of antibacterial action from the perspective of the new compound is approached. Several severe bacterial infections are treated with tigecycline, omadacycline, and eravacycline (with parenteral or oral formulations). In addition, sarecycline is very useful in treating acne vulgaris. Tetracyclines also have other non-antibiotic properties that require in-depth studies, such as the anti-inflammatory effect effect of sarecycline. The main side effects of modern tetracyclines are described in accordance with published clinical studies. Undoubtedly, this class of antibiotics continues to arouse the interest of researchers. As a result, new derivatives are developed and studied primarily for the antibiotic effect and other biological effects.

New perspectives on the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by the presence of painful nodules, abscesses, chronically draining fistulas, and scarring in apocrine gland-bearing areas of the body. The exact pathogenesis of HS is not yet well understood, but there is a consensus in considering HS a multifactorial disease with a genetic predisposition, an inflammatory dysregulation, and an influence of environmental modifying factors. Therapeutic approach of HS is challenging due to the wide clinical manifestations of the disease and the complex pathogenesis. This review describes evidence for effectiveness of current and emerging HS therapies. Topical therapy, systemic treatments, biological agents, surgery, and light therapy have been used for HS with variable results. Adalimumab is the only US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved biologic agent for moderate-to-severe HS, but new therapeutic options are being studied, targeting different specific cytokines involved in HS pathogenesis. Comparing treatment outcomes between therapies is difficult due to the lack of randomized controlled trials. Treatment strategy should be selected in concordance to disease severity and requires combination of treatments in most cases.

Vulvoperineal Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management of Deformities

Importance

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory disorder affecting skin of intertriginous areas that is often encountered and treated by nondermatologic specialists.

Objective

The purpose of this literature review is to provide a comprehensive, clinical source of information on HS as it relates to incidence of disease, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and overall management of this condition.

Evidence Acquisition

Sources were obtained through a comprehensive literature search using PubMed and PMC. Various terms were used to query the database, including "hidradenitis suppurativa," "pathogenesis," "prevalence," "management," "surgery," "perineal," and "vulva."

Results

Underreported prevalence and unknown pathogenesis have subsequently led to variable approaches in clinical management, often employing a combination of medical and surgical management.

Conclusions

Early diagnosis and treatment of HS may lead to better disease control and minimize patients' associated morbidity related to disease.

Relevance

Knowledge of vulvoperineal hidradenitis is necessary for gynecologists and primary care physicians to ensure early diagnosis, management, and referral for optimal patient outcomes.

Trends in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Disease Severity and Quality of Life Outcome Measures: Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Although there has been an increase in the number of randomized controlled trials evaluating treatment efficacy for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), instrument measurements of disease severity and quality of life (QoL) are varied, making the compilation of data and comparisons between studies a challenge for clinicians.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to perform a systematic literature search to examine the recent trends in the use of disease severity and QoL outcome instruments in randomized controlled trials that have been conducted on patients with HS.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted in February 2021. The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were used to identify all articles published from January 1964 to February 2021. In total, 41 articles were included in this systematic review.

RESULTS

The HS Clinical Response (HiSCR) score (18/41, 44%) was the most commonly used instrument for disease severity, followed by the Sartorius and Modified Sartorius scales (combined: 16/41, 39%). The Dermatology Life Quality Index (18/41, 44%) and visual analogue pain scales (12/41, 29%) were the most commonly used QoL outcome instruments in HS research.

CONCLUSIONS

Randomized controlled trials conducted from 2013 onward commonly used the validated HiSCR score, while older studies were more heterogeneous and less likely to use a validated scale. A few (6/18, 33%) QoL measures were validated instruments but were not specific to HS; therefore, they may not be representative of all factors that impact patients with HS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

National Institute of Health Research PROSPERO CRD42020209582; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020209582.

LAight® Therapy Significantly Enhances Treatment Efficacy of 16 Weeks of Topical Clindamycin Solution in Hurley I and II Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Results from Period A of RELIEVE, a Multicenter Randomized, Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory, burdensome skin disease where medical first-line treatment is still limited to long-term, topical and/or systemic antibiotics. The RELIEVE study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of LAight® therapy - a combination of intense pulsed light and radiofrequency - as an adjunct treatment to first-line therapies in Hurley stage I and II HS.

METHODS

The RELIEVE study was performed as a two-period multicenter randomized controlled trial with blinded assessment. For period A from week 0 to week 16, the 88 participating subjects were randomized into either an intervention group (IG) or a control group (CG). The IG received topical clindamycin 1% solution combined with 8 additional bi-weekly treatments with LAight® therapy. The CG was treated with topical clindamycin 1% solution only. After 16 weeks, patients entered open-label period B and both groups were treated exclusively with LAight® therapy for an additional 16 weeks (8 sessions). The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Score System (∆IHS4) at week 16 to baseline. Secondary endpoints were DLQI, HiSCR, Pain-NRS, and HADS.

RESULTS

In total, from the 88 patients enrolled in RELIEVE, 81 patients were included in the endpoint analysis after period A. After 16 weeks of treatment, the ∆IHS4 of the group treated with the combination of LAight® therapy and topical clindamycin 1% solution was -7.2 ± 6.7 (-60.0%), which was significantly higher in magnitude than the ∆IHS4 in the group treated with clindamycin 1% solution alone (-1.8 ± 5.6, -17.8%, p < 0.001). Secondary endpoints, including other clinical scores as well as patient-reported outcomes, confirmed that the efficacy of the combined treatment was superior to monotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The results of the primary endpoint analysis of period A of the RELIEVE study show that the combined therapy with LAight® and topical clindamycin 1% solution, resulted in a significantly higher decrease in disease severity and an improvement of quality of life in comparison to topical clindamycin 1% solution monotherapy. Treatment was well tolerated, and side effects were all mild and transitory. These data speak for the implementation of the combined treatment as a first-line therapy in Hurley stage I and II HS. LAight® therapy as long-term monotherapy (results from period B), will be analyzed in a consecutive paper.

Multidisciplinary Management of Adolescents with Hidradenitis Suppurativa - Series of Cases and Literature Review

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a recurrent chronic inflammatory condition of the skin with a debilitating potential, especially in adolescents who may experience psychosocial disorders and impaired quality of life. Recognition of typical, recurrent lesions, history of the disease and family investigation establishes the diagnosis. The rarity of the disease in males and the appearance of this condition in children, which is also rare, in two of our adolescent patients, respectively, are the reasons for publishing this article. We reviewed the literature and found that variation exists across international treatment for this HS, and much collaboration is needed to put forth unified and updated recommendations. It is of major importance that the early recognition of the condition and the establishment of treatment in the multidisciplinary team. Psychotherapy, health education, the adoption of a healthy lifestyle, the application of local prevention measures, and long-term medical treatment are components of a correct management. Extensive surgical treatment should be restricted only to severe cases because it may lead to complications, extend the hospitalization period and increase psychological problems in adolescents. The treatment will be personalized, performed according to the stage of evolution, and the approach will be a multidisciplinary one.

Point your SmartPhone at the code above. If you have a QR code reader, the video abstract will appear. Or use:

https://youtu.be/00jselpGQUo

Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Where We Are and Where We Are Going

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease primarily affecting apocrine gland-rich areas of the body. It is a multifactorial disease in which genetic and environmental factors play a key role. The primary defect in HS pathophysiology involves follicular occlusion of the folliculopilosebaceous unit, followed by follicular rupture and immune responses. Innate pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-1β, and TNF-α); mediators of activated T helper (Th)1 and Th17 cells (e.g., IFN-γ, and IL-17); and effector mechanisms of neutrophilic granulocytes, macrophages, and plasma cells are involved. On the other hand, HS lesions contain anti-inflammatory mediators (e.g., IL-10) and show limited activity of Th22 cells. The inflammatory vicious circle finally results in pain, purulence, tissue destruction, and scarring. HS pathogenesis is still enigmatic, and a valid animal model for HS is currently not available. All these aspects represent a challenge for the development of therapeutic approaches, which are urgently needed for this debilitating disease. Available treatments are limited, mostly off-label, and surgical interventions are often required to achieve remission. In this paper, we provide an overview of the current knowledge surrounding HS, including the diagnosis, pathogenesis, treatments, and existing translational studies.

Clinical Epidemiology and Management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease with a prevalence of 0.1-1%, characterized by nodules and abscesses in the axillae, groin, and inframammary areas, sometimes developing into tunnels (or fistulas) and scars. Because hidradenitis suppurativa is more common in women and in those aged 18-40 years, obstetrician-gynecologists (ob-gyns) have the opportunity to diagnose, educate, initiate treatment, and coordinate care with ancillary health care professionals. The recently published North American treatment guidelines, along with management information for patients with hidradenitis suppurativa who are pregnant or breastfeeding, are summarized. By diagnosing and optimizing hidradenitis suppurativa treatment early in the disease course, ob-gyns can reduce morbidity, with the potential to favorably alter disease trajectory.

[Topical and novel device-based therapies for mild hidradenitis suppurativa]

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the skin folds, which requires more outpatient treatment alternatives. Although the disease was previously treated using surgery, new treatment modalities now allow the effective treatment of mild and moderate cases in an ambulatory care setting.

AIM OF STUDY

Local and instrument-based therapies are presented and their efficacy and safety profiles are highlighted.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical evidence for each therapeutic modality are presented and current treatment developments are analyzed based on the future treatment of HS patients in Germany.

RESULTS

Effective treatments for outpatient care of HS patients include topical clindamycin, resorcinol, and intralesional corticosteroids. New devices such as LAight therapy (combining intense pulsed light [IPL] with radiofrequency) are available, which can be used as monotherapy or adjunct therapy in combination with systemic treatment and/or surgery for the management of HS.

CONCLUSION

Evidence-based use of local treatments can provide more efficient outpatient and self-administered strategies, which improves the quality of life of HS patients, especially for patients with recurrent mild and moderate disease.

Family physicians' awareness and general knowledge of hidradenitis suppurativa: A survey research

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVE

Medical consultations of family physicians play a key role in early diagnosis and proper management of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). This study aimed to investigate family physicians' disease awareness, general attitudes, and knowledge of HS.

MATERIAL-METHODS

This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted with 211 family physicians and residents through a web-based survey. The questionnaire consisted of 25 questions about the demographic characteristics of the participants as well as their awareness and general knowledge of HS.

RESULTS

While 90% of physicians know that the diagnosis of HS is made clinically without any need for a laboratory examination, only 23.7% of them felt confident performing such a diagnosis. About 63% of participants defined HS as an infectious disease of the apocrine glands, contradictive to the real pathophysiology. About 21% of them had not been medically trained in HS, and 3% of them even had never heard the name of HS. Only 33% were aware of the role of biological agents. Most of the family physicians (57.4%) were willing to participate in postgraduate education programmes about HS.

CONCLUSION

The family physicians' awareness of HS is limited. Increased practice in medical education and postgraduate education programmes may help increase the knowledge of family physicians.

[Systemic treatment of moderate/severe hidradenitis suppurativa]

Systemic treatment together with radical surgical excision is the most important treatment option for all severity grades of hidradenitis suppurativa. Tetracycline in mild-to-moderate forms and clindamycin in combination with rifampicin in moderate-to-severe forms are guideline-compliant first-line therapy with a good clinical response. Other antibiotics such as ertepenem or multiple combinations are recommended as last-line therapy due to a lack of data. Success rate with dapsone and retinoids, on the other hand, are insufficient-only acitretin can be recommended on the basis of the available studies, but with limited success. With the TNF-alpha blocker adalimumab, an effective and safe long-term therapy is available-further biologics are in clinical trials and could significantly expand the treatment portfolio in the future.