Prospective, randomized study comparing amoxycillin-clavulanic acid and cefamandole for the prevention of wound infection in high-risk patients undergoing elective biliary surgery

Antibiotic prophylaxis for post-operative wound infection in clean elective breast surgery

Antibiotic prophylaxis has been used to good effect in the prevention of post-operative wound infections in patients undergoing gastrointestinal operations. We have assessed the use of a single dose of intravenous antibiotic (Augmentin 1.2 g), given with induction of anaesthesia as prophylaxis, against post-operative wound infection in women undergoing clean, elective breast surgery. Three hundred and thirty-four patients were recruited. Of the 164 receiving antibiotic prophylaxis 29 (17.7%) had wound infections compared with 32 (18.8%) in the placebo group (P=0.79). There were no significant differences in any other post-operative infective complications. Antibiotic prophylaxis is probably not required in clean, elective breast surgery.

Amoxycillin/clavulanic acid combinations increase transmigration of leucocytes through endothelial cell monolayers: endothelial cells play a key role

Postoperative inflammation is still viewed as an unresolved problem. During inflammation, leucocytes play a tremendous role and migrate from intravascular spaces into the tissue to attack microorganisms. Different agents, e.g. anaesthetic drugs, are able to influence leucocyte recruitment. Previous studies have investigated the influence of amoxycillin on chemotaxis of leucocytes alone. The aim of our study was to examine the effect of amoxycillin/clavulanic acid (co-amoxiclav) on leucocyte migration through endothelial cell monolayers (ECMs). Human umbilical endothelial cells were cultured on microporous membranes, achieving a monolayer. Polymorphonuclear neutrophil leucocytes (PMNLs) were used in a migration assay. The numbers of untreated PMNLs migrating through untreated ECMs were used as control and set as 100%. PMNLs and/or ECMs were pretreated with co-amoxiclav using clinically relevant as well as higher and lower concentrations. Co-amoxiclav was able to increase PMNL migration through ECMs significantly (P<0.05) when both cell types were treated (291+/-18.7%). When PMNLs or ECMs were treated alone, it could be shown that ECMs were more affected than PMNLs. The greatest effect was shown when both cell types, PMNLs and ECMs, were treated. In conclusion, co-amoxiclav was identified as a potent drug to increase leucocyte transmigration through ECMs. ECMs were also critically involved. Co-amoxiclav also affects endothelial cells.

Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The "Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999" presents the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s recommendations for the prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs), formerly called surgical wound infections. This two-part guideline updates and replaces previous guidelines.1,2 Part I, "Surgical Site Infection: An Overview," describes the epidemiology, definitions, microbiology, pathogenesis, and surveillance of SSIs. Included is a detailed discussion of the pre-, intra-, and postoperative issues relevant to SSI genesis. Part II, "Recommendations for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection," represents the consensus of the Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) regarding strategies for the prevention of SSIs.3 Whenever possible, the recommendations in Part II are based on data from well-designed scientific studies. However, there are a limited number of studies that clearly validate risk factors and prevention measures for SSI. By necessity, available studies have often been conducted in narrowly defined patient populations or for specific kinds of operations, making generalization of their findings to all specialties and types of operations potentially problematic. This is especially true regarding the implementation of SSI prevention measures. Finally, some of the infection control practices routinely used by surgical teams cannot be rigorously studied for ethical or logistical reasons (e.g., wearing vs not wearing gloves). Thus, some of the recommendations in Part II are based on a strong theoretical rationale and suggestive evidence in the absence of confirmatory scientific knowledge.It has been estimated that approximately 75% of all operations in the United States will be performed in "ambulatory," "same-day," or "outpatient" operating rooms by the turn of the century.4 In recommending various SSI prevention methods, this document makes no distinction between surgical care delivered in such settings and that provided in conventional inpatient operating rooms. This document is primarily intended for use by surgeons, operating room nurses, postoperative inpatient and clinic nurses, infection control professionals, anesthesiologists, healthcare epidemiologists, and other personnel directly responsible for the prevention of nosocomial infections. This document does not: Specifically address issues unique to burns, trauma, transplant procedures, or transmission of bloodborne pathogens from healthcare worker to patient, nor does it specifically address details of SSI prevention in pediatric surgical practice. It has been recently shown in a multicenter study of pediatric surgical patients that characteristics related to the operations are more important than those related to the physiologic status of the patients.5 In general, all SSI prevention measures effective in adult surgical care are indicated in pediatric surgical care. Specifically address procedures performed outside of the operating room (e.g., endoscopic procedures), nor does it provide guidance for infection prevention for invasive procedures such as cardiac catheterization or interventional radiology. Nonetheless, it is likely that many SSI prevention strategies also could be applied or adapted to reduce infectious complications associated with these procedures. Specifically recommend SSI prevention methods unique to minimally invasive operations (i.e., laparoscopic surgery). Available SSI surveillance data indicate that laparoscopic operations generally have a lower or comparable SSI risk when contrasted to open operations.6-11 SSI prevention measures applicable in open operations (e.g., open cholecystectomy) are indicated for their laparoscopic counterparts (e.g., laparoscopic cholecystectomy). Recommend specific antiseptic agents for patient preoperative skin preparations or for healthcare worker hand/forearm antisepsis. Hospitals should choose from products recommended for these activitie

Antimicrobial prophylaxis in bowel surgery in The Netherlands

The guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in various types of bowel surgery (colorectal, biliary and gastroduodenal) in 33 antibiotic formularies used by 89 Dutch hospitals were studied. The majority of the formularies recommended drugs with adequate efficacy against bacteria most frequently associated with surgical wound infection. Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and first- or second-generation cephalosporins, with or without metronidazole, were recommended most frequently. Recommendations for third-generation cephalosporins and broad-spectrum penicillins were limited. A relatively high proportion (between 52 and 66%) of the formularies recommended multiple-dose regimens.