Criteria for cessation of CPR in the emergency department

Factors associated with physician decision making on withholding cardiopulmonary resuscitation in prehospital medicine

This study seeks to identify factors that are associated with decisions of prehospital physicians to start (continue, if ongoing) or withhold (terminate, if ongoing) CPR in patients with OHCA. We conducted a retrospective study using anonymised data from a prehospital physician response system. Data on patients attended for cardiac arrest between January 1st, 2010 and December 31st, 2018 except babies at birth were included. Logistic regression analysis with start of CPR by physicians as the dependent variable and possible associated factors as independent variables adjusted for anonymised physician identifiers was conducted. 1525 patient data sets were analysed. Obvious signs of death were present in 278 cases; in the remaining 1247, resuscitation was attempted in 920 (74%) and were withheld in 327 (26%). Factors significantly associated with higher likelihood of CPR by physicians (OR 95% CI) were resuscitation efforts by EMS before physician arrival (60.45, 19.89-184.29), first monitored heart rhythm (3.07, 1.21-7.79 for PEA; 29.25, 1.93-442. 51 for VF / pVT compared to asystole); advanced patient age (modelled using cubic splines), physician response time (0.92, 0.87-0.97 per minute) and malignancy (0.22, 0.05-0.92) were significantly associated with lower odds of CPR. We thus conclude that prehospital physicians make decisions to start or withhold resuscitation routinely and base those mostly on situational information and immediately available patient information known to impact outcomes.

Conceptualizations of clinical decision-making: a scoping review in geriatric emergency medicine

BACKGROUND

Clinical decision-making (CDM) is an important competency for young doctors especially under complex and uncertain conditions in geriatric emergency medicine (GEM). However, research in this field is characterized by vague conceptualizations of CDM. To evolve and evaluate evidence-based knowledge of CDM, it is important to identify different definitions and their operationalizations in studies on GEM.

OBJECTIVE

A scoping review of empirical articles was conducted to provide an overview of the documented evidence of findings and conceptualizations of CDM in GEM.

METHODS

A detailed search for empirical studies focusing on CDM in a GEM setting was conducted in PubMed, ProQuest, Scopus, EMBASE and Web of Science. In total, 52 publications were included in the analysis, utilizing a data extraction sheet, following the PRISMA guidelines. Reported outcomes were summarized.

RESULTS

Four themes of operationalization of CDM emerged: CDM as dispositional decisions, CDM as cognition, CDM as a model, and CDM as clinical judgement. Study results and conclusions naturally differed according to how CDM was conceptualized. Thus, frailty-heuristics lead to biases in treatment of geriatric patients and the complexity of this patient group was seen as a challenge for young physicians engaging in CDM.

CONCLUSIONS

This scoping review summarizes how different studies in GEM use the term CDM. It provides an analysis of findings in GEM and call for more stringent definitions of CDM in future research, so that it might lead to better clinical practice.

Factors influencing termination of resuscitation in children: a qualitative analysis

BACKGROUND

Pediatric Advanced Life Support provides guidelines for resuscitating children in cardiopulmonary arrest. However, the role physicians' attitudes and beliefs play in decision-making when terminating resuscitation has not been fully investigated. This study aims to identify and explore the vital "non-medical" considerations surrounding the decision to terminate efforts by U.S.-based Pediatric Emergency Medicine (PEM) physicians.

METHODS

A phenomenological qualitative study was conducted using PEM physician experiences in terminating resuscitation within a large freestanding children's hospital. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 physicians, sampled purposively for their relevant content experience, and continued until the point of content saturation. Resulting data were coded using conventional content analysis by 2 coders; intercoder reliability was calculated as κ of 0.91. Coding disagreements were resolved through consultation with other authors.

RESULTS

Coding yielded 5 broad categories of "non-medical" factors that influenced physicians' decision to terminate resuscitation: legal and financial, parent-related, patient-related, physician-related, and resuscitation. When relevant, each factor was assigned a directionality tag indicating whether the factor influenced physicians to terminate a resuscitation, prolong a resuscitation, or not consider resuscitation. Seventy-eight unique factors were identified, 49 of which were defined by the research team as notable due to the frequency of their mention or novelty of concept.

CONCLUSION

Physicians consider numerous "non-medical" factors when terminating pediatric resuscitative efforts. Factors are tied largely to individual beliefs, attitudes, and values, and likely contribute to variability in practice. An increased understanding of the uncertainty that exists around termination of resuscitation may help physicians in objective clinical decision-making in similar situations.

A Scoping Review of Physicians' Clinical Reasoning in Emergency Departments

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Clinical reasoning is considered a core competency of physicians. Yet there is a paucity of research on clinical reasoning specifically in emergency medicine, as highlighted in the literature.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review to examine the state of research on clinical reasoning in this specialty. Our team, composed of content and methodological experts, identified 3,763 articles in the literature, 95 of which were included.

RESULTS

Most studies were published after 2000. Few studies focused on the cognitive processes involved in decisionmaking (ie, clinical reasoning). Of these, many confirmed findings from the general literature on clinical reasoning; specifically, the role of both intuitive and analytic processes. We categorized factors that influence decisionmaking into contextual, patient, and physician factors. Many studies focused on decisions in regard to investigations and admission. Test ordering is influenced by physicians' experience, fear of litigation, and concerns about malpractice. Fear of litigation and malpractice also increases physicians' propensity to admit patients. Context influences reasoning but findings pertaining to specific factors, such as patient flow and workload, were inconsistent.

CONCLUSION

Many studies used designs such as descriptive or correlational methods, limiting the strength of findings. Many gray areas persist, in which studies are either scarce or yield conflicting results. The findings of this scoping review should encourage us to intensify research in the field of emergency physicians' clinical reasoning, particularly on the cognitive processes at play and the factors influencing them, using appropriate theoretical frameworks and more robust methods.

Addressing Myths about End-of-Life Care: Research into the Use of Acute Care Hospitals over the Last Five Years of Life

Despite very little confirming evidence, one of the most pervasive beliefs about dying is that terminally ill people receive a great deal of health care in the last few days, weeks, or months of life. A secondary analysis of 1992/93 through 1996/97 Alberta inpatient hospital abstracts data was undertaken to explore and describe hospital use over the five years before death by all Albertans who died in acute care hospital beds during the 1996/97 year (n=7,429). There were four key findings: (1) hospital use varied, but was most often low, (2) the last hospital stay was infrequently resource intensive, (3) age, gender, and illness did not distinguish use, and (4) most ultra-high users were rural residents, with the majority of care episodes taking place in small, rural hospitals.

Termination of resuscitation: the art of clinical decision making

Despite all of the progress in reanimating patients in cardiac arrest over the last half century, resuscitation attempts usually fail to restore spontaneous circulation. Thus, the most common of all resuscitation decisions after initiation remains the decision to stop. An entire library of research and guidelines for terminating resuscitative efforts has been developed in the past decade. However, this most central decision is often left open to chance, provider preference, family wishes, futility judgments, and resource concerns-a host of subjective considerations at the bedside and beyond. This article sheds light on these considerations, acknowledging the pivotal role that resuscitation science and guidelines can play in the multifactorial decision to discontinue resuscitative efforts.

Resuscitation decision index: a new approach to decision-making in prehospital CPR

Retrospective and prospective studies have been undertaken to assess physicians' practice-patterns by studying cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) case summaries. Most summaries reveal similar influences by the physician, patient and situation-related variables on the patterns of resuscitation. The initiation of resuscitation efforts is addressed frequently, but, very few studies discuss the topic of termination of resuscitation. Prehospital emergencies are addressed very rarely. The objective of this study was to introduce a new methodological approach towards initiation and termination of resuscitation efforts in prehospital situations. The subject studied were the physicians' decisions concerning initiation/withholding, termination/withdrawal and the resulting early survival rates. The result is termed the "Resuscitation decision index" (RDI). The "RDI" could be a tool allowing comparisons on a quantitative level, between different EMS systems or disciplines and giving an insight into the decision process. The "RDI" can enhance audit of resuscitation. The process of decision-making can be used to help future theoretical decision-making strategies.

Criteria for dead-on-arrivals, prehospital termination of CPR, and do-not-resuscitate orders

In contrast to the current consensus that governs the mechanics of prehospital advanced cardiac life support (ACLS), uniform criteria for determining when to initiate, withhold, or terminate ACLS in the field do not exist. Most emergency medical services (EMS) permit paramedics and other prehospital providers to withhold resuscitation when the victim obviously is dead, but the accuracy and appropriateness of this judgement in the field have not been subjected to empiric research. Do-not-resuscitate orders on patients in community settings often are problematic when paramedics and other prehospital providers are governed by standing orders that require them to initiate CPR when it is indicated medically. To date, eight states and a number of local EMS systems have developed a variety of policies to address this dilemma. Currently, few services permit paramedics to terminate ACLS in the field when such efforts fail to achieve return of spontaneous circulation. Studies have demonstrated convincingly that the rapid transport of such patients for further attempts at resuscitation in the hospital yields dismal rates of survival. The costs, risks, and benefits of this practice in community settings must be reviewed carefully to allocate EMS resources in an optimal manner.

The use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation: how nephrologists and internists differ

We performed a national survey to explore the circumstances under which general internists and nephrologists discuss cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with patients and the factors influencing physician decisions to open such discussions. We wondered whether nephrology fellowship training and/or formal exposure to an ethics course during training altered physicians' use of CPR. Significantly more nephrologists than internists responded to the study (nephrologists, 174/467; internists, 92/380; P less than 0.01). Few of the respondents participated in an ethics course during training (9% of nephrologists, 15% of internists; P = NS), and fewer than half (26% of nephrologists, 37% of internists; P = NS) had engaged in formal discussions about initiating and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment during their training. Nephrologists spent significantly more time caring for patients in intensive care units (ICUs) (29% v 21% of time, P less than 0.05), and more often discussed CPR during their first meeting with a patient (7% of nephrologists v 1% of internists; P less than 0.05). Twenty-eight percent of nephrologists and 19% of internists thought CPR should be offered to all patients. Both nephrologists and internists rated neurologic dysfunction as the most important and age the least important factor influencing decisions to terminate CPR. Nephrologists were less comfortable than internists with healthy dialysis patients' decisions to refuse CPR. We conclude that nephrologists are more inclined than internists to use CPR in dialysis patients, in patients with impaired functional status, and in all patients. Training in medical ethics did not account for the differences among nephrologists and internists.

'Not for resuscitation': the student nurses' viewpoint

A variable proportion of hospital in-patients were deemed 'not for resuscitation'. Using a qualitative methodology, this phenomenon was investigated, placing particular emphasis upon the effect on nursing care. A total of 71 student nurses from two district general hospitals were interviewed and from transcriptions of tape recordings of the interviews, utilizing a grounded theory approach, the following conceptual categories were identified: the patients; decision making; changes in nursing care? are patients and/or their relatives consulted? the unsuccessful resuscitation; the right to die; and dying and death. Up to 40% of patients on medial wards, and up to 100% of patients on geriatric and psychiatric wards, were deemed 'not for resuscitation'. The most junior members of the medical team had the power to make this decision without consultation with the nursing staff, patients or relatives. Nurses spent more time attending to patients 'not for resuscitation', but physiotherapists and medical staff withdrew. Informants felt that subjecting patients to cardiopulmonary resuscitation was incompatible with a dignified death. Senior members of the nursing staff were felt to be unfeeling in dealing with the distress of their juniors when laying out deceased patients. More discussion and joint decision making between health care professionals would alleviate some of the student nurses' distress concerning patients who are 'not for resuscitation'.

Patients without choices: the ethics of decision-making in emergency medicine

Patients who use emergency department services generally have no choice of facilities or medical personnel. This fact affects the nature of the physician-patient relationship and the moral rules that govern it. Because a long-term relationship has not been developed, a more formal, legalistic relationship seems inevitable and appropriate. Moreover, the emotional stress of the emergency situation on the patient and the fact that the baseline mental status is unknown to the medical personnel often make it difficult to determine competency for decision-making, especially in cases of refusal of treatment. Although standards of informed consent apply in emergency care, there seem to be discrepancies between theory and practice, and emergency physicians may be more guilty than others of unjustified paternalism. Ways must be found to ensure patients the greatest degree possible of autonomy and informed consent analogous to what they would have in a nonemergency doctor-patient relationship.