Psychosocial consequences of upper limb injury

Assessment of quality of life after upper extremity transplantation: Framework for patient-reported outcome scale domains

Upper extremity transplantation offers the promise of restored function and regained quality of life (QOL) for individuals who have sustained hand or arm amputation. However, a major challenge for this procedure becoming an accessible treatment option for patients is the lack of standard measures to document benefits to QOL. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures are well-suited for this kind of intervention, where the perspective of the patient is central to defining treatment success. To date, qualitative work with experts, clinicians, and patients has been used to identify the most important domains of QOL for PRO item development. Specifically, our group's qualitative work has identified several domains of QOL that are unique to individuals who have received upper extremity transplants, which are distinct from topics covered by existing PRO measures. These include emotional and social aspects of upper extremity transplant, such as Expectations and Perceived Outcomes, Integration and Assimilation of Transplant, Fitting in, and Post-Surgical Challenges and Complications. The broad topic of Satisfaction with Transplant was subdivided into three subtopics: Function, Sensation, and Aesthetics. Satisfaction with Sensation was also identified as a unique domain not evaluated by existing PRO measures. This report operationalizes these eight QOL domains by presenting scoping definitions. This manuscript describes the work that has been completed for domain characterization as an early step toward developing standardized PRO measures to evaluate these important outcomes specific to upper extremity transplantation.

Impairment and disability after severe hand injuries with multiple phalangeal fractures

PURPOSE

Upper-extremity impairment evaluation is performed mostly by using guidelines provided by the American Medical Association (AMA). Recently, subjective disability tests, such as the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, have been developed that appreciate the limitations patients experience in everyday life. In this study, the correlation between impairment and disability was assessed after treatment for severe hand injuries with multiple phalangeal fractures, with adjustment for comorbidity and follow-up duration.

METHODS

The functional recovery of patients suffering severe hand trauma was evaluated using AMA impairment rating tests and DASH disability questionnaire scores.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight patients with 228 phalangeal fractures were available for testing, with a mean follow-up period of 7.5 years. No statistically significant correlation existed between the AMA impairment ratings for the hand and the DASH module scores. There were weak correlations between the AMA impairment ratings for the arm and total body and the DASH module function scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of a strong correlation emphasizes the clear distinction between impairment and disability. The inclusion of disability outcome measures in the evaluation of hand trauma regimens might help to expand the clinician's view to more individualized, activity-of-daily-living-oriented, treatment regimens.

Early psychological stress after forearm nerve injuries: a predictor for long-term functional outcome and return to productivity

Forearm and wrist injuries can result in a nonfunctional hand caused by loss of motor and sensory functions. Psychological stress is known to accompany traumatic hand injuries and may therefore affect functional outcome. The authors conducted a retrospective study of 107 patients diagnosed with a median, ulnar, or combined median-ulnar nerve injury (79% response rate) who completed a questionnaire package consisting of the Impact of Event Scale (IES); Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; and a questionnaire concerning return to work and time off work. In an outpatient setting, motor and sensory recovery were examined. Ninety-four percent of those studied experienced early psychological stress. Thirty-six percent of patients reported sufficient symptoms 1 month postoperatively to be classified as in need for psychological treatment (IES score > 30 points). Combined median-ulnar nerve injuries (mean, 35.0 +/- 20.3 points [standard deviation]) were accompanied by a higher psychological stress compared with single nerve injuries (median injuries: mean, 24.2 +/- 20.6 points; ulnar injuries: mean, 22.6 +/- 19.5 points; p = 0.049 and p = 0.021 respectively). Multiple linear regression adjusting for age, gender, and severity of the trauma revealed an association between the IES score and the functional symptom score (beta = 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.65), mean time off work (beta = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.25-0.75), and motor recovery (grip: beta = 0.37; 95% CI, 0.09-0.65; tip-pinch: beta = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.13-0.80). Patients with higher scores on the IES were found to be at increased risk for incapacity for work (odds ratio, 3.32; 95% CI, 1.60-6.91). Higher education was found to be a protecting variable for posttraumatic psychopathology (beta = -0.23; 95% CI, -6.05--0.246). This study demonstrated a high level of early posttraumatic psychological stress after forearm and wrist nerve injuries. These data provide evidence that functional outcome and work resumption are influenced negatively by early psychological stress, independent from severity of the somatic trauma. This indicates that outcome after upper extremity nerve injuries may be influenced positively by psychological intervention.

The EFFUL (Evaluation of Function in the Flail Upper Limb) system. A ranking score system to measure improvement achieved by surgical reconstruction and rehabilitation

The EFFUL (Evaluation of Function of the Flail Upper Limb) system measures in numerical terms the improvement, achieved through reconstructive surgery and hand therapy, in patients with brachial plexus injuries. The EFFUL system measures practical, everyday activities performed with the shoulder, elbow, forearm, wrist and hand. The ranking system is based upon a classification of function, with a hierarchy of increasing functional demands until normal function has been achieved. These activities focus on two-handed coordination and hand dominance. The score is plotted on a star histogram known as the patient's profile, and shows the preoperative score achieved in the first evaluation, and the postoperative score achieved in the second evaluation. The shaded area between the two plotted points clearly demonstrates any improvement in function obtained by surgery and rehabilitation. It also demonstrates the interrelationship between the various regions: improvement in function in one region often results in improvement in other regions.