Relationship of creatinine clearance to orthoiodohippurate measured effective renal plasma flow

Feasibility of Renal Blood Flow Measurement Using 64Cu-ATSM PET/MRI: A Quantitative PET and MRI Study

This study aimed to evaluate the renal blood flow (RBF) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) using ⁶⁴Cu(II)-diacetyl-bis(4-methylthiosemicarbazonate) (⁶⁴Cu-ATSM) for positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We included five healthy controls (HCs) and ten patients with CKD. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated from the serum creatinine (cr) and cystatin C (cys) levels. The estimated RBF (eRBF) was calculated using the eGFR, hematocrit, and filtration fraction. A single dose of ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM (300-400 MBq) was administered for RBF evaluation, and a 40 min dynamic PET scan was performed with simultaneous arterial spin labeling (ASL) imaging. PET-RBF images were obtained from the dynamic PET images at 3 min after injection using the image-derived input function method. The mean eRBF values calculated from various eGFR values differed significantly between the patients and HCs; both groups also differed significantly in terms of the RBF values (mL/min/100 g) measured using PET (151 ± 20 vs. 124 ± 22, p < 0.05) and ASL-MRI (172 ± 38 vs. 125 ± 30, p < 0.001). The ASL-MRI-RBF was positively correlated with the eRBFcr-cys (r = 0.858, p < 0.001). The PET-RBF was positively correlated with the eRBFcr-cys (r = 0.893, p < 0.001). The ASL-RBF was positively correlated with the PET-RBF (r = 0.849, p < 0.001). ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM PET/MRI demonstrated the reliability of PET-RBF and ASL-RBF by comparing them with eRBF. This is the first study to demonstrate that ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM-PET is useful for assessing the RBF and is well correlated with ASL-MRI.

Aortic Blood Flow Reversal Determines Renal Function

Aortic stiffness determines the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and predicts the progressive decline of the GFR. However, the underlying pathophysiological mechanism remains obscure. Recent evidence has shown a close link between aortic stiffness and the bidirectional (systolic forward and early diastolic reverse) flow characteristics. We hypothesized that the aortic stiffening–induced renal dysfunction is attributable to altered central flow dynamics. In 222 patients with hypertension, Doppler velocity waveforms were recorded at the proximal descending aorta to calculate the reverse/forward flow ratio. Tonometric waveforms were recorded to measure the carotid-femoral (aortic) and carotid-radial (peripheral) pulse wave velocities, to estimate the aortic pressure from the radial waveforms, and to compute the aortic characteristic impedance. In addition, renal hemodynamics was evaluated by duplex ultrasound. The estimated GFR was inversely correlated with the aortic pulse wave velocity, reverse/forward flow ratio, pulse pressure, and characteristic impedance, whereas it was not correlated with the peripheral pulse wave velocity or mean arterial pressure. The association between aortic pulse wave velocity and estimated GFR was independent of age, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, and antihypertensive medication. However, further adjustment for the aortic reverse/forward flow ratio and pulse pressure substantially weakened this association, and instead, the reverse/forward flow ratio emerged as the strongest determinant of estimated GFR ( P =0.001). A higher aortic reverse/forward flow ratio was also associated with lower intrarenal forward flow velocities. These results suggest that an increase in aortic flow reversal (ie, retrograde flow from the descending thoracic aorta toward the aortic arch), caused by aortic stiffening and impedance mismatch, reduces antegrade flow into the kidney and thereby deteriorates renal function.