A specialist toxicity database (TRACE) is more effective than its larger, commercially available counterparts

Web portal for management of bioindication methods and ecotoxicological tests in ecological risk assessment

The objective of this article is to inform about efforts to design and implement a data model that can parametrically describe and store information about a wide range of ecotoxicological tests and bioindication methods used in Ecological Risk Assessment (EcoRA). At the same time it describes comprehensive web-based portal built on this model that can be used to quickly find relevant biological assays (ecotoxicological biotests) for given situation and therefore support the decision-making process in EcoRA. The model structure, features of the corresponding website and its current content is described in detail and proposed development and possible collaboration is outlined. The portal (DATEST) is located at http://projects.cba.muni.cz/datest. The aim of this work is to complement existing EcoRA decision-support tools with a web-based engine for storing and searching biological tests and methods used in EcoRA as there is currently no similar informational source available on the Internet.

Comparison of 35 electronic databases for environmental risk assessment

The objective of this work is to classify and evaluate the major factual electronic databases that could be efficiently questioned for environmental risk assessment of various chemicals. A series of 35 databases available on commercial CD-ROMs and/or freely accessible on the Internet were listed and compared for the presence or absence of information for 27 environmental criteria. A factorial correspondence analysis indicated that most of the 35 databases are specialized in physicochemical, toxicological or ecotoxicological data but a few of them are nonspecialized databases able to answer simultaneously in various areas. We then evaluated these 35 databases by querying them for 14 selected test chemicals. It appeared that the percentage of chemicals being listed in the databases was very unequal and none of the 35 databases obtained 14 positive responses. The quality of the responses was determined by calculating the number of criteria being documented for the previously listed chemicals in each database. It suggested that HSDB, DOSE, TOMES, IPCS are the most efficient databases to be used for an urgent search of environmental data.