Effect of restored and unrestored non-carious cervical lesions on the fracture resistance of previously restored maxillary premolar teeth

Microbiological characterization and effect of resin composites in cervical lesions

BACKGROUND

Non carious cervical lesions associated to muscle hyperfunctions are increasing. Microhybrid resin composites are used to restore cervical abfractions. The purpose of this study was to investigate if resin composites modify tooth plaque, inducing an increment of cariogenic microflora and evaluate their effect, in vivo and in vitro, against S. mutans.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eight abfractions were restored with two microhybrid resin composites (Venus, Heraeus-Kulzer® and Esthet-X, Dentsply®), after gnatological therapy, in three patients with muscle hyperfunctions. For each abfraction three samples of plaque were taken from the cervical perimeter: before the restoration, one week and three months after restoration. The samples were evaluated both by traditional microbiological methods and by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). In vitro, disk-shaped specimens of the two composites were prepared to estimate the effects against pre-cultured S. mutans, after incubation at 37°C for 24h and assessed by a turbidimetric technique.

RESULTS

In vivo no differences were found in plaque growth, for all samples, before and after restoration with both composites; in vitro, instead, a significant reduction of S. mutans growth was found between specimens of two composites (Mann-Whitney U-test p>0,06).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study a relevant consideration was elicited: composite materials, in vivo, do not modify plaque composition of non carious cervical lesions to a potential cariogenic plaque. Key words:Abfraction, restoration, S. mutans, composite, class V.

Esthetic noncarious Class V restorations: a case report

When restoring anterior and posterior teeth affected by noncarious cervical lesions, many clinicians overlook the etiologic factors responsible for the lesions' development, resulting in frequent restorative failures. The treatment approach for noncarious cervical lesions must not be based only on restorative procedures since a variety of causative and aggravating factors are related to their formation. This article discusses a treatment protocol and techniques for the restoration of noncarious Class V lesions and presents a clinical case in which esthetic restorations are achieved.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Treatment options for noncarious Class V lesions can range from simply eliminating the causative factors of the lesions and regularly monitoring their progression to specific restorative procedures. Resin composites are the best materials for restoring cervical defects owing to their bonding ability, physical properties, and esthetic potential. A straightforward technique for the successful restoration of noncarious Class V lesions is presented.

Noncarious cervical lesions and abfractions: a re-evaluation

BACKGROUND

The concept of abfraction is controversial. The authors present the fundamental basis of abfraction and review studies that describe the condition.

TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED

The authors used data on masticatory forces, enamel and dentin properties, as well as stress studies related to abfraction, for background information. They also analyzed the genesis of the abfraction theory, experimental evidence, case presentations, clinical investigations and restorative studies.

RESULTS

The theory of abfraction is based primarily on engineering analyses that demonstrate theoretical stress concentration at the cervical areas of teeth. While some recent stress studies support earlier findings, others have provided significant deviating information. Few controlled studies exist that demonstrate the relationship between occlusal loading and abfraction lesions. The role of occlusal loading in noncarious cervical lesions (as shown by clinical data) appears to be part of a multifactorial event that may not necessarily follow the proposed classic abfraction mechanism, and other mechanisms or factors may explain cervical restoration failure just as well.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

There is little direct evidence supporting the theory of abfraction as the primary factor in the formation of noncarious cervical lesions. Controlled clinical trials are necessary to elucidate more fully the etiology of those lesions.

The aetiology of the non-carious cervical lesion

Erosion and abrasion have been widely reported as causes of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL). However, more recently, tooth flexure has been implicated in the formation of these lesions generating renewed interest in the pathogenesis of the non-carious loss of cervical tooth substance. This paper considers the causes of erosion and abrasion, related to modern lifestyles, and reviews the literature concerning tooth flexure as a cause of NCCL. A description of different types of NCCL is given, as an aid to determining the aetiology, yet at the same time accepting that the causation and pathogenesis of NCCL is probably multi-factorial resulting in many different clinical presentations. Consideration is given to the indications for treatment of NCCL and to the selection of materials for restoring such defects.