Bases y evidencias clínicas de los efectos de los nuevos tratamientos farmacológicos en la insuficiencia cardíaca

Levosimendan as a treatment for acute renal failure associated with cardiogenic shock after hip fracture

Inotropic drugs are part of the treatment of heart failure; however, inotropic treatment has been largely debated due to the increased incidence of adverse effects and increased mortality. Recently levosimendan, an inotropic positive agent, has been proved to be effective in acute heart failure, reducing the mortality and improving cardiac and renal performance. We report the case of a 75-year-old woman with history of heart and renal failure and hip fracture. Levosimendan was used in preoperative preparation as an adjuvant therapy, to improve cardiac and renal function and to allow surgery.

[Levosimendan as a treatment for acute renal failure associated with cardiogenic shock after hip fracture]

Inotropic drugs are part of the treatment of heart failure; however, inotropic treatment has been largely debated due to the increased incidence of adverse effects and increased mortality. Recently levosimendan, an inotropic positive agent, has been proved to be effective in acute heart failure, reducing the mortality and improving cardiac and renal performance. We report the case of a 75-year-old woman with history of heart and renal failure and hip fracture. Levosimendan was used in preoperative preparation as an adjuvant therapy, to improve cardiac and renal function and to allow surgery.

Management of resistant arterial hypertension: role of spironolactone versus double blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system

BACKGROUND

Currently there is no consensus regarding which add-on therapy to use in resistant hypertension. This study was designed to compare two treatment options, spironolactone (SPR) versus dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS).

METHODS

Forty-two patients with true resistant hypertension were included in the study. An open-label prospective crossover design was used to add a second RAAS blocker to previous treatment and then SPR following 1 month of wash-out. BP was measured in the office and by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Changes in laboratory tests were also studied for both treatments. The predictive values of aldosterone-renin ratio (ARR) and serum potassium of determining the antihypertensive response were analyzed for both arms.

RESULTS

Following the first stage of dual blockade, SBP dropped significantly both in office (reduction of 12.9 ± 19.2 mmHg)) and by ABPM (reduction of 7.1 ± 13.4 mmHg). Office DBP was unchanged but was significantly reduced as measured by ABPM (3.4 ± 6.2 mmHg). On SPR treatment, office BP was reduced 32.2 ± 20.6/10.9 ± 11.6 mmHg. By ABPM the reduction was 20.8 ± 14.6/8.8 ± 7.3 mmHg (P < 0.001). The BP control was achieved by 25.6% of patients in dual blockade and 53.8% in SPR with office blood pressure. By ABPM, 20.5% were controlled on dual blockade and up to 56.4% with SPR. Serum potassium was a weak inverse predictor of the blood pressure-lowering effect of SPR.

CONCLUSION

SPR has a greater antihypertensive effect than dual blockade of the RAAS in resistant hypertension. SPR at daily doses of 25-50 mg shows a potent antihypertensive effect when added to prior regimes of single RAAS axis blockade in patients with resistant arterial hypertension.