[Elective noninvasive test in the diagnosis of coronary disease in the aged]

[Acute coronary syndrome in women. Gender differences]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Our aims was to investigate possible gender differences in the diagnostic assessment, treatment and prognosis of patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prospective study of a cohort of 396 patients consecutively admitted to the coronary unit in the period of 18 months with the diagnoses of ACS. We divided the sample into two groups based on gender: 294 men and 102 women. We analysed the diagnostic assessment, hospital treatment, coronary revascularization (ICP), appearance of heart failure (HF) and in-hospital and 1-year mortality. We analyzed predictors of mortality in a multivariate model.

RESULTS

Women were older (70.9±11.9 versus 64.4±12.0; P<.001) and had more comorbidities such as hypertension (70.5% versus 53.7%; P=.003), diabetes (51.0% versus 33.3%; P<.01) and HF (20.5% versus 9.1%; P<.01) than men, while men had greater frequency of smoking (54.42% versus 13.73%; P<.001). Women had higher incidence of cardiogenic shock on admission. There were no differences in thrombolysis and women did not have a different pattern of access to coronary angiography, but men had greater frequency of ICP (50.8% versus 34.6%; P<.01). Women were more likely to develop a higher in-hospital HF (32.6% versus 25.9%; P<.05) and in-hospital mortality (17.6% versus 4.7%; P<.001). In the multivariate analyses, HF on admission OR 8.98 (3.29-24.47), older age OR 1.07 (1.01-1.13) and female gender OR 3.14 (1.27-7.74), were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, female gender was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in patients with ACS.

[Angiographic correlates of the high-risk criteria for conventional exercise testing and the Duke treadmill score]

OBJECTIVE

To compare the sensitivity, the specificity, the positive and negative predictive value and the predictive accuracy of the Duke Treadmill Score, the Spanish Society of Cardiology (SEC) and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) high-risk criteria for exercise testing in the detection of left main disease, three vessel disease and two vessel disease involving the proximal left anterior descending artery.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

A cohort of 199 patients (age 75 years) consecutively admitted to hospital for unstable angina was studied. All patients underwent an exercise stress test and coronariography.

RESULTS

The SEC high-risk Criteria showed a sensitivity of 69.2% and a specificity of 49.0%. The ACC/AHA high-risk Criteria demonstrated a sensitivity of 98.1% and a specificity of 23.8% and the Duke Treadmill Score presented a sensitivity of 30.8% and a specificity of 90.5%. In patients with moderate risk in the Duke Treadmill Score we found a sensitivity of 62.9% and a specificity of 39.8% for the SEC high-risk criteria, while the ACC/AHA high-risk Criteria presented a sensitivity of 100.0% and a specificity of 5.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACC/AHA high-risk Criteria showed a higher sensitivity while the Duke Treadmill Score presented a higher specificity for the detection of left main disease, three vessel disease and two vessel disease involving the proximal left anterior descending artery. The ACC/AHA and SEC high-risk Criteria were found to be very useful in the group of patients with moderate risk in the Duke Treadmill Score.

The comparable diagnostic accuracies of dobutamine-stress and dipyridamole-stress echocardiographies: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Dobutamine-stress and dipyridamole-stress echocardiographies are widely used for pharmacological stress echocardiography, with wide geographical variations.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether evidence derived from the literature indicates or disapproves that either stress modality confers diagnostic superiority.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of peer-reviewed literature of published trials with head-to-head comparison, on the same population, of high-dose (0.84 mg/kg) dipyridamole-stress versus high-dose (up to 40 micrograms/kg per min) dobutamine-stress echocardiography. Data from 12 studies performed in 12 institutions in seven countries were analysed. Angiographic information about 818 patients was considered.

RESULTS

The diagnostic accuracies of the two tests were similar (631 of 818, 77%, for dipyridamole versus 654 of 818, 80%, for dobutamine, NS). Overall sensitivities were 403 of 568 (71%) for dipyridamole and 437 of 568 (77%) for dobutamine (P < 0.05). Sensitivities for patients with single-vessel disease were 177 of 275 (64%) for dipyridamole and 203 of 275 (74%) for dobutamine (P < 0.05). Sensitivities for patients with multivessel disease were 162 of 203 (80%) for dipyridamole and 163 of 203 (80%) for dobutamine (NS). Specificities were 232 of 250 (93%) for dipyridamole and 217 of 250 (87%) for dobutamine (P < 0.05). Data from an additional 26 studies with dipyridamole alone and 47 studies with dobutamine alone were analysed. The diagnostic accuracies were 80% for dipyridamole (n = 2038 patients; 95% confidence interval 75-82%) and 82% for dobutamine (n = 4264 patients; 95% confidence interval 79-84%).

CONCLUSION

High-dose dobutamine-stress and high-dose dipyridamole-stress echocardiographies have comparable diagnostic accuracies, with a slightly higher sensitivity with dobutamine and a slightly higher specificity with dipyridamole.

Dipyridamole stress echocardiography

Dipyridamole stress is the forerunner and prototype of pharmacological stress echo tests in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. The safety of this test has been conclusively demonstrated as a result of extensive experience in large-scale multicenter projects. The diagnostic accuracy of dipyridamole stress echo is comparable to dobutamine and largely a function of the employed dose. Higher dosages (up to 0.84 mg/kg) are being required to achieve good sensitivity. The prognostic value has been shown to be independent and additive to clinical, exercise echocardiogram, and angiographic data. The test positive response should be titrated on the basis of severity, extent, and timing of induced dyssynergy with low positivity being associated to more anatomically and functionally severe forms of disease. Multicenter, randomized, prospective, international studies on cost-effectiveness directly comparing a noninvasive strategy centered on stress echo versus an invasive strategy centered on coronary angiography are currently ongoing.