[The clinical and angiographic evolution of dilated lesions in the proximal segment of the anterior descending coronary artery: stent versus balloon]

Two-year follow-up of sirolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of proximal left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis

INTRODUCTION

Sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) have demonstrated low target vessel revascularizations and low incidence of angiographic restenosis in several clinical scenarios. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy and safety of SES for the treatment of proximal left anterior descending coronary artery (pLAD) lesions.

METHODS

Ninety-six patients with severe pLAD stenosis were enrolled. Angiographic and clinical follow-up were performed at 6 and 24 months, respectively. Death, myocardial infarction (MI), new target lesion revascularization (TLR), and target vessel failure (TVF) were registered. Clinical, angiographic, and procedural variables were analyzed to identify predictors of restenosis.

RESULTS

Mean clinical follow-up was 858+/-158 days (26.5+/-8.3 months). Angiographic procedural success was 100%. Angiographic follow-up showed 8.4% of binary restenosis without edge-restenosis phenomenon. Late loss was 0.15+/-0.65 mm; 15.6% of patients had an adverse cardiac event, with 1% of death, 5.2% of MI, 6.3% of TLR, and 9.4% of TVF. At 2 years, the probabilities of cumulative TVF- and TLR-free survival were 90.6% and 93.7%, respectively. Interestingly, no adverse cardiac events were registered between the first and second years. Female gender (OR 10.7 CI 95%[1.7-66.7]) and in-stent restenosis (OR 8.2, CI 95%[1.2-56.4]) were found as independent predictors of binary restenosis. Advanced chronic renal failure showed a strong trend toward worse outcome in terms of binary restenosis (P=0.063).

CONCLUSIONS

SES for the treatment of pLAD stenosis proved safe and effective in a long-term follow-up with low incidence of adverse cardiac events and restenosis. Female gender and in-stent restenosis were predictors of binary restenosis.

[Long-term follow-up of patients with proximal left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis treated with stent]

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

Patients with lesions of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery are a special high-risk group. In the present study we analyzed the efficacy and safety of coronary stenting in such lesions and the factors related to a less favorable prognosis in long-term follow-up.

METHODS

Ninety-eight consecutive patients with severe left anterior descending artery stenosis were enrolled, all with coronary angioplasty and elective stenting. Clinical follow-up was carried out annually in all patients by personal interview or telephone contact. The incidence of death, new infarction, anginal status, and new revascularization procedures was registered. Clinical, angiographic, and procedural variables were analyzed to identify predictors of long term prognosis.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 38 11 months. There was only one major periprocedural complication, which required urgent surgery. Five deaths were registered, 3 of non-cardiac and 2 of cardiac origin. Twenty-five patients developed angina and 11 underwent a new revascularization of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery (6 surgical and 5 angioplasty). Two patients had new anterior myocardial infarction. At 60 months the major cardiac event-free rate was 83.7% and the cardiac death-free rate was 98%. The use of two stents and the association of diabetes-hypertension-hypercholesterolemia were associated with a less favorable prognosis in our population.

CONCLUSIONS

Stenting of left anterior descending coronary stenosis was safe and effective in a long-term analysis. The survival rate was high and the incidence of new revascularization was low.

[Usefulness of predictors of angiographic restenosis to predict clinical restenosis after coronary stent placement]

INTRODUCTION

After coronary stenting, several predictors of angiographic in-stent restenosis have been identified in different studies, however, little is known about predictors of clinical restenosis, a more functional aspect of coronary restenosis.

AIM

To assess whether risk factors for angiographic restenosis previously described, are able to predict clinical restenosis and at what rate in current practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

216 consecutive patients (271 stents in 256 lesions) with procedural success were followed-up for 17.6 +/-10 months during periodic visits. Clinical restenosis was defined as the presence of symptoms or signs of myocardial ischemia, associated with >= 50% diameter stenosis on the angiogram.

RESULTS

Clinical restenosis occurred in 33 lesions (13%), which were revascularized with 34 stents associated with unstable angina in 29, acute myocardial infarction in three and death in one case. Multivariate analysis identified as independent predictors of clinical restenosis, a vessel diameter less than 3 mm (p < 0.001, OR 4.5), a restenotic lesion (p = 0.01, OR 2.9) and the presence of residual stenosis by visual estimate (> 0%) after implantation (p = 0. 02, OR 2.5). These three risk factors explained most clinical restenosis (73%), with rates of 22% when at least one was present and 4% in absence of all these. The presence of diabetes mellitus, the location in the anterior descending coronary artery or at coronary ostium, and the number or total length of stents per lesion did not achieve an independent, significant association as predictors of clinical restenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Most clinical restenosis after coronary stenting can be predicted by the restenotic character of the revascularized lesion, the diameter of the vessel being less than 3 mm and the presence of residual stenosis by visual estimate at the end of procedure.