Boost irradiation of breast carcinoma: teletherapy vs. brachytherapy

[Brachytherapy of breast cancer]

For breast cancer, interstitial brachytherapy remains an accurate irradiation technique for delivering a high dose (increasing the local control) in a small volume (decreasing the toxicity). In this article, we present the technical data related to the breast brachytherapy proceeding, from the implantation of the vectors to the treatment itself, including the planning. The different indications of breast brachytherapy include all the breast irradiations focusing on the initial tumour bed (partial irradiation of the breast), such as boost, accelerated and partial breast irradiation (APBI) and second conservative radiosurgical treatment in case of ipsilateral in-breast recurrence. The results in terms of efficacy and toxicity are presented for each indication. Interstitial breast brachytherapy, performed according with the standard rules, remains a major technique for breast cancer treatment.

Forward-planned, multiple-segment, tangential fields with concomitant boost in the treatment of breast cancer

We report on the utility of forward-planned, 3-dimensional (3D), multiple-segment tangential fields for radiation treatment of patients with breast cancer. The technique accurately targets breast tissue and the tumor bed and reduces dose inhomogeneity in the target. By decreasing excess dose to the skin and lung, a concomitant boost to the tumor bed can be delivered during the initial treatment, thereby decreasing the overall treatment time by one week. More than 120 breast cancer patients have been treated with this breast conservation technique in our clinic. For each patient, a 3D treatment plan based upon breast and tumor bed volumes delineated on computed tomography (CT) was developed. Segmented tangent fields were iteratively created to reduce "hot spots" produced by traditional tangents. The tumor bed received a concomitant boost with additional conformal photon beams. The final tumor bed boost was delivered either with conformal photon beams or conventional electron beams. All patients received 45 Gy to the breast target, plus an additional 5 Gy to the surgical excision site, bringing the total dose to 50 Gy to the boost target volume in 25 fractions. The final boost to the excision site brought the total target dose to 60 Gy. With minimum follow-up of 4 months and median follow-up of 11 months, all patients have excellent cosmetic results. There has been minimal breast edema and minimal skin changes. There have been no local relapses to date. Forward planning of multi-segment fields is facilitated with 3D planning and multileaf collimation. The treatment technique offers improvement in target dose homogeneity and the ability to confidently concomitantly boost the excision site. The technique also offers the advantage for physics and therapy staff to develop familiarity with multiple segment fields, as a precursor to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques.

[Brachytherapy boost for breast cancer: what do we know? Where do we go?]

Since many years, Brachytherapy (BT) appears to play an important role in the treatment of many solid tumors. For breast cancer, BT is usually used as boost after postoperative external beam radiation therapy. In certain circumstances, BT can be used as sole radiation technique focalized on the tumor bed or more rarely, as second conservative treatment in case of local recurrence for woman refusing salvage mastectomy. Boost BT is most often applied via an interstitial technique while the dose rate can vary from low to high dose rate through pulse dose rate. All of those boost techniques were published and some of them compared the results obtained with BT and external beam electron therapy. The analysis of the published phase II and III trials was not able to show significant differences between the two boost techniques in term of local control as well as late skin side effects. However, we noted that the patients who received BT boost presented a higher risk of local recurrence compare to those treated with electron therapy, due to age, margin status or presence of extensive intraductal component. Only a phase III trial randomizing BT boost vs electron therapy boost could show a possible improvement of local control rate in the BT arm; however, this trial should enroll patients with a real high risk of local recurrence in order to take benefit from the dosimetric advantages of BT.

The role of boost irradiation in the conservative treatment of stage I-II breast cancer

In this article, we review the current status, indication, technical aspects, controversies, and future prospects of boost irradiation after breast conserving surgery (BCS). BCS and radiotherapy (RT) of the conserved breast became widely accepted in the last decades for the treatment of early invasive breast cancer. The standard technique of RT after breast conservation is to treat the whole breast up to a total dose of 45 to 50 Gy. However, there is no consensus among radiation oncologists about the necessity of boost dose to the tumor bed. Generally accepted criteria for identification of high risk subgroups, in which boost is recommended, have not been established yet. Further controversy exists regarding the optimal boost technique (electron vs. brachytherapy), and their impact on local tumor control and cosmesis. Based on the results of numerous retrospective and recently published prospective trials, the European brachytherapy society (GEC-ESTRO), as well as the American Brachytherapy Society has issued their guidelines in these topics. These guidelines will help clinicians in their medical decisions. Some aspects of boost irradiation still remain somewhat controversial. The final results of prospective boost trials with longer follow-up, involving analyses based on pathologically defined subgroups, will clarify these controversies. Preliminary results with recently developed boost techniques (intraoperative RT, CT-image based 3D conformal brachytherapy, and 3D virtual brachytherapy) are promising. However, more experience and longer follow-up are required to define whether these methods might improve local tumor control for breast cancer patients treated with conservative surgery and RT.