Experience with an obstetric perineal clinic

Do neonatal birth weight thresholds for labor dystocia outcomes differ between short and normal stature women?

OBJECTIVE

To determine if there is a correlation between maternal short stature and neonatal birth weight among women with adverse outcomes related to labor dystocia.

METHODS

The medical records of singleton deliveries with adverse obstetric outcomes related to labor dystocia during 2014-2020, in a single tertiary center, were reviewed. Outcomes included at least one of the following: cesarean delivery (CD) due to cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD), prolonged second stage, shoulder dystocia, third- or fourth-degree perineal tear. Maternal short stature was defined as height below the 10th centile (short stature group) and normal stature was defined as maternal height between the 10th and 90th centiles (normal stature group). Maternal and neonatal characteristics were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

A total of 3295 women were included, among them, 307 in the short stature group (9.3%, height 1.52 ± 0.02 m) and 2988 in the normal stature group (90.7%, height 1.63 ± 0.04 m). Evaluating the entire cohort revealed similar neonatal birth weights comparing the short and normal stature groups. A subgroup analysis of women after CD due to CPD (n = 296) revealed lower neonatal birth weights in the short stature group (n = 31) compared with the normal stature group (n = 265) (3215 ± 411 vs 3484 ± 427 g, P = 0.001, respectively). Multivariable linear regression was performed for women who underwent CD due to CPD. After adjusting for obesity and diabetes mellitus, short stature and nulliparity were found to be independently associated with decreased neonatal birth weight (266 g less for short stature, P = 0.001, and 294 g less for nulliparity, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Among women with short stature, CD due to CPD occurs at lower neonatal birth weights.

A Postpartum Perineal Clinic in Nova Scotia: Characteristics Associated With Attendance and Its Association With Recurrent Obstetrical Anal Sphincter Tears

OBJECTIVES

The Healthy Recovery after Childbirth Clinic (HRCC) in Nova Scotia provides postpartum care to patients who experience obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). The purpose of this study was to describe characteristics associated with HRCC attendance, characteristics associated with a trial of labour in a subsequent delivery, and OASIS recurrence by HRCC attendance status.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study using the Atlee Perinatal Database and clinical record review included primiparous individuals who sustained an OASIS at IWK Health in Halifax between 2013 and 2020. The χ2 and Fisher exact tests were performed to compare groups.

RESULTS

Of the 1041 individuals included, 67% attended HRCC. Attendance increased from 58% in 2013-2015 to 77% in 2019-2020. Younger age (<25 years) and smoking were associated with lower HRCC attendance (P = 0.07 and <0.01, respectively). Other characteristics, including area-level income and driving distance to HRCC, were not associated with attendance (P > 0.05). Of the 439 individuals who had a subsequent delivery, 92% had a trial of labour. Individuals with fourth-degree injury were less likely to attempt a trial of labour than those with third-degree injury (73% vs. 94%, P < 0.01). Of those who delivered vaginally, OASIS recurrence was similar in those who did and did not attend the HRCC (7.5% vs. 6.5%, P = 0.84).

CONCLUSIONS

HRCC attendance was high, but the disparity by age and smoking status suggests some barriers to access that should be explored. Although we found no difference in OASIS recurrence by HRCC attendance, more research with larger samples with adjustment for confounders is needed.

Development and Validation of a Tool to Identify Anal Incontinence in Pregnant and Postnatal Women

BACKGROUND

Neuromuscular and mechanical damage to the pelvic floor because of pregnancy and birth can result in anal incontinence. Pregnant and postnatal women are rarely screened for anal incontinence by clinicians who specialize in the care of these women, and no screening tool has been developed for routine use in these women.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a tool for use in everyday clinical practice in the care of pregnant and postnatal women.

DATA SOURCES

The study includes 2 test phases with separate data sources. Phase I included test and retest phases of the Bowel-Screening Questionnaire in health professionals and women who were pregnant or had recently birthed (n = 45). Phase II included a pilot of the tool compared to 2 current scoring systems (n = 358).

SETTING

Large tertiary hospital in South Australia.

PATIENTS

Phase II: prospective recruitment of 358 prenatal parous women attending a first antenatal appointment.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

To evaluate the reliability and validity of the developed tool.

RESULTS

Test-retest agreement in phase I was excellent for each of the 6 items, with each κ statistic being between 0.83 and 1.0. In phase II, agreement between new and existing tools was fair to good for the detection of anal incontinence symptoms addressed as a composite question (κ between 0.41 and 0.71). Anal incontinence was detected in 191 women (53%) using the new tool, and there was a lower prevalence reported using the Vaizey score (n = 118) and Wexner score (n = 129). Completion rates of the new tool were 99%, higher than both the Vaizey score (33%) and Wexner score (36%).

LIMITATIONS

Sample size limits the generalization of findings.

CONCLUSION

The questionnaire is reliable and valid, reporting a high incidence of bowel incontinence, with predominant symptoms of rectal urgency and flatus as precursors for worsening function.

DESARROLLO Y VALIDACIN DE UNA HERRAMIENTA PARA IDENTIFICAR LA INCONTINENCIA ANAL EN MUJERES EMBARAZADAS Y PURPERAS

ANTECEDENTES:El daño neuromuscular y mecánico del piso pélvico debido al embarazo y al parto puede resultar en incontinencia anal. Las mujeres embarazadas y puérperas rara vez son examinadas para la incontinencia anal por médicos que se especializan en el cuidado de estas mujeres, y no se ha desarrollado ninguna herramienta de detección para uso rutinario en estas mujeres.OBJETIVO:Desarrollar y validar una herramienta para uso en la práctica clínica diaria en el cuidado de las mujeres embarazadas y puérperas.FUENTES DE DATOS:El estudio incluye 2 fases de prueba con fuentes de datos separadas. Fase 1, fase test y retest del Bowel Screening Questionnaire en profesionales sanitarios y mujeres embarazadas o recién paridas (n = 45). La Fase 2 incluyó una prueba piloto de la herramienta en comparación con dos sistemas de puntuación actuales (n = 358).ENTORNO CLINICO:Gran hospital terciario en el sur de Australia.PACIENTES:Fase 2: reclutamiento prospectivo de 358 mujeres con parto prenatal que asisten a una primera cita prenatal.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:Evaluar la confiabilidad y validez de la herramienta desarrollada.RESULTADOS:La concordancia test-retest en la fase 1 fue excelente para cada uno de los 6 ítems con cada estadística kappa entre 0,83 y 1,0. En la fase 2, el acuerdo entre las herramientas nuevas y las existentes fue regular a bueno para la detección de síntomas de incontinencia anal abordados como una pregunta compuesta (kappa entre 0,41 y 0,71). Se detectó incontinencia anal en 191 (53%) de las mujeres que utilizaban la nueva herramienta, y se notificó una prevalencia más baja utilizando la puntuación de Vaizey (n = 118) y la puntuación de Wexner (n = 129). Las tasas de finalización de la nueva herramienta fueron del 99%, más altas que la puntuación de Vaizey (33%) y las puntuaciones de Wexner (36%).LIMITACIONES:El tamaño de la muestra limita la generalización de los hallazgos.CONCLUSIONES:El cuestionario es confiable y válido reportando una alta incidencia de incontinencia intestinal, con síntomas predominantes de urgencia rectal y flatos como precursores del empeoramiento de la función. (Traducción-Dr. Ingrid Melo ).

Starting a peripartum pelvic floor disorder clinic: what to expect in the first thirty-six months

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Subspecialty peripartum pelvic floor disorder (PFD) clinics provide care to a unique patient population. We aim to describe the experiences of such a clinic in the first 36 months after its establishment.

METHODS

This is a descriptive case series of all women who presented to a subspecialty PFD clinic at an academic medical center over 36 months (January 2018-December 2020). Patient characteristics, referral patterns, and care plans will be described.

RESULTS

Four hundred eighty-three women presented for care. Women were a mean age of 31.0 ± 4.2 years, most were primiparous (404, 83.6%), and over half (279, 57.8%) had a spontaneous vaginal delivery. Three hundred eighteen women (66.9%) had obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI), which was also the primary referral indication in 313 (64.8%). Most consultations were from an obstetrician (246, 51.3%), and the median time from delivery to evaluation was 17 days (IQR 11.0-34.0). The majority of women had one additional follow-up visit (330, 68.3%). One hundred forty-one (29.9%) women underwent minor office procedures, and 26 (5.4%) underwent surgery. The number of referrals sequentially increased from year 1 (59, 12.2%) to year 3 (215, 44.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The 36-month experiences in our growing subspecialty peripartum PFD clinic demonstrate both sustainability and feasibility of this new service line, with consistent clinical growth over time and 483 new consultations, 2/3 of which were for OASI and the other 1/3 for a variety of peripartum pelvic floor indications. Our data outline a model for care, including timeline for follow-up, treatments administered, and number of interventions, both office and surgical.

Can We Predict Feto-Maternal Adverse Outcomes of Vacuum Extraction?

Introduction Vacuum extraction (VE) is an important modality in modern obstetrics, yet sometimes results in maternal or neonatal adverse outcomes, which can cause a lifetime disability. We aimed to characterize potential risk factors for adverse outcomes that in retrospect would have led the physician to avoid the procedure. Materials and Methods Retrospective cohort of 3331 singleton pregnancies, ≥ 34 w delivered by VE. 263 deliveries (7.9%) incurred a VE-related feto-maternal adverse outcome, defined as one or more of the following: 3-4th-degree perineal laceration, subgaleal hematoma, intracranial hemorrhage, shoulder dystocia, clavicular fracture, Erb's palsy or fracture of humerus. 3068 deliveries (92.1%) did not have VE-related adverse outcomes. Both groups were compared to determine potential risk factors for VE adverse outcomes. Results Multivariable regression found seven independent risk factors for VE-related feto-maternal adverse outcomes: Nulliparity - with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.82 (95% CI = 1.11-2.98, p = 0.018), epidural anesthesia (OR 1.99, CI = 1.42-2.80, p < 0.001), Ventouse-Mityvac (VM) cup (OR 1.86, CI = 1.35-2.54, p < 0.001), prolonged second stage as indication for VE (OR 1.54, CI = 1.11-2.15, p = 0.010), cup detachment (OR 1.66, CI = 1.18-2.34, p = 0.004), increasing procedure duration (OR 1.07 for every additional minute, CI = 1.03-1.11, p < 0.001) and increasing neonatal birthweight (OR 3.42 for every additional kg, CI = 2.33-5.02, p < 0.001). Occiput anterior (OA) position was a protective factor (OR 0.62, CI = 0.43-0.89, p = 0.010). Conclusions VE-related adverse outcomes can be correlated to clinical characteristics, such as nulliparity, epidural anesthesia, VM cup, prolonged second stage as indication for VE, cup detachment, prolonged procedure duration and increasing neonatal weight. OA position was a protective factor. This information may assist medical staff to make an informed decision whether to choose VE or cesarean delivery (CD).

Modified Perineal Reconstruction Combined with Anal Sphincter Repair for Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical effectiveness of modified perineal reconstruction combined with anal sphincter repair in the treatment of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS).

Methods

Twenty consecutive patients with an OASI who underwent modified perineal reconstruction combined with anal sphincter repair in the Department of Colorectal and Anal Surgery of the First Hospital of Jilin University from October 2015 to September 2017 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Anal function was evaluated using the Williams grade, the Wexner score, anorectal manometry, and transrectal ultrasound.

Results

Differences in both the Williams grade and the Wexner score prior to operation and following surgery indicated that anal function had improved, and these differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). These indices also showed further improvement six months after surgery as compared with values at one month, and again, these differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). In addition, anorectal manometry at six months following surgery showed statistically significant differences in the maximum anal resting pressure, maximum anal systolic pressure, and anal defecation pressure as compared with values prior to operation (P < 0.05). Postoperative endorectal ultrasound revealed that the anal sphincter presented with close imbricated overlapping.

Conclusion

Modified perineal reconstruction combined with anal sphincter repair in the treatment of female perineal defect is associated with a good clinical outcome, strengthening anal function, and reconstructing the perineum, and is a possible method for clinical treatment.

Enhancing the identification of anal incontinence in women of reproductive age

Anal incontinence is an unpredictable and debilitating condition that can significantly reduce quality of life. Symptoms include the involuntary loss of solid and/or liquid stool, flatus incontinence and rectal urgency. Pregnancy and childbirth are two major factors that increase the risk of anal incontinence in women of reproductive age. Women at high risk of anal incontinence include those with a known history of the condition and those who have experienced severe perineal trauma, particularly after injury to the anal sphincters (third-degree and fourth-degree tears). Routine screening for anal incontinence of women in high-risk groups during pregnancy and after childbirth appears to be limited in clinical practice. This article discusses the potential benefits of screening for anal incontinence, outlines the factors that inhibit and enable screening, describes current bowel screening tools and their limitations, and explores how the identification of anal incontinence in women of reproductive age could be improved.

Establishing a peripartum perineal trauma clinic: a narrative review

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is not rare, and its consequences are multiple and potentially severe, especially for young women. Some dedicated perineal clinics have been established to improve the management of OASI. Despite their obvious importance, these specific clinics are underrepresented and underdeveloped. The objectives of this review are to explore various options for developing a peripartum perineal clinic and to compare the different practices regarding the mode of delivery for subsequent pregnancies after an OASI.

METHODS

This narrative review covers information from patients' questionnaires specific to anal incontinence, anal physiology assessment, pelvic floor and anal sphincter imaging, and the arguments for choosing the mode of delivery after an OASI.

RESULTS

This review highlights the extensive range of practices regarding the delivery mode after an OASI throughout national professional organizations and experienced perineal clinics.

CONCLUSION

This review summarizes the different choices in developing a perineal clinic to facilitate their development in promoting health care and education specific for peripartum women concerning the perineal consequences of delivery for obstetrician-gynaecologists, family doctors, and residents.

A one-stop perineal clinic: our eleven-year experience

Introduction and hypothesis

The perineal clinic is a dedicated setting offering assessment for various childbirth-related presentations including obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs), perineal wound complications, pelvic floor dysfunction and other conditions such as female genital mutilation(FGM). We describe the clinical presentation and outcomes of women from a tertiary perineal clinic based on data collected over an 11-year period.

Methods

This is a retrospective observational study. A one-stop outpatient service was offered to all women who sustained OASIs (postnatally and antenatally in a subsequent pregnancy), perineal complications (within 16 weeks postpartum), FGM and/or peripartum symptoms of urinary/anal incontinence or prolapse. Assessment included history with validated questionnaires, examination and anal manometry and endoanal ultrasound when appropriate. Outcomes were compared among different grades of OASIs. Management of each type of presentation was reported with outcomes.

Results

There were 3254 first attendance episodes between 2006 and 2016. The majority (58.1%) were for OASIs, followed by perineal wound complications. Compared to the lower grades, the higher grades of OASI were associated with poorer outcomes in terms of symptoms, investigations and complications. Women with OASIs had unrelated symptoms such as urinary incontinence, perineal pain and wound infections that needed further intervention. A high proportion(42%) of wound complications required further specialist management.

Conclusion

We describe a dedicated, one-stop perineal clinic model for antenatal and postnatal women for management of perineal and pelvic floor disorders. This comprehensive and novel data will enable clinicians to better counsel women regarding of outcomes after OASI and focus training to minimize risks of morbidities.

Health Care-Seeking Characteristics of Women With Pelvic Floor Disorders After Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury

OBJECTIVES

Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) is a potentially serious complication of vaginal delivery and can lead to both short-term and long-term sequelae. This study sought to identify health care seeking patterns of women who developed pelvic floor symptoms including pelvic pain after OASIS. It also identified demographic and clinical factors associated with seeking subspecialty care from a pelvic floor specialist and demographic and clinical factors associated with seeking care for pelvic pain after OASIS.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective cohort study of 69 women who developed pelvic floor disorders after OASIS.

RESULTS

For women diagnosed with a pelvic floor symptom, the mean time to follow-up was 2.4 years, the mean number of visits until diagnosis was 2.2 visits, and 2.9 visits were needed for treatment. The most common diagnoses were pelvic pain, lower urinary tract symptoms including incontinence, and defecatory dysfunction. Twenty-five percent of the cohort received treatment from a pelvic floor specialist. These women were more likely to be older and have urinary incontinence. Women with pain were more likely to be seen by a primary care provider and have longer time to diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The study showed that multiple visits were needed to both diagnose and treat pelvic floor disorders (PFD) after OASIS. Pelvic pain was the most common primary PFD after OASIS. There should be a high level of suspicion for pelvic floor disorders, especially pain disorders, in women who have sustained a third- or fourth-degree laceration.

Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury as a Quality Metric: 16-Year Experience at a Single Institution

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate trends in annual rates of vaginal birth, cesarean delivery, and obstetric anal sphincter injury at a single institution before and after the designation of obstetric anal sphincter injury as a measure of obstetric quality and safety.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of women undergoing a singleton vaginal delivery and diagnosed with obstetric anal sphincter injury over a 16-year period. International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision codes for perineal lacerations were used as identifiers. Trends in annual cesarean delivery, perineal laceration, and obstetric anal sphincter injury rates were assessed in a linear regression model. The data were divided into two time periods (1998-2005 and 2006-2013) based on the year (2006) in which obstetric anal sphincter injury was designated as a quality marker and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 1,366 women had obstetric anal sphincter injury, and 1,360 were included for analysis. There was a 12.1% decline in annual vaginal delivery rates (from 77.1% to 67.8%) and a 40.6% increase in annual cesarean delivery rate (from 22.9% to 32.2%; P<.001). The rate of first-degree and second-degree laceration increased significantly (P=.009), and obstetric anal sphincter injury decreased significantly (P<.001). Operative vaginal birth and episiotomy were associated with obstetric anal sphincter injury in 2006-2013 compared with 1998-2005 (P<.001 and P=.018, respectively).

CONCLUSION

After the designation of obstetric anal sphincter injury as an institutional quality measure, rates of obstetric anal sphincter injury decreased.

Effectiveness of an educational programme in perineal repair for midwives

OBJECTIVE

to evaluate the effectiveness of a work-based module and in-service educational programme in perineal repair for midwives on their perceived level of competency undertaking this skill in clinical practice.

DESIGN

a quasi-experimental pre-post intervention case study combining a non-equivalent comparison group and evaluation action research.

SETTING

six NHS consultant/midwifery led Trusts in South East England between December 2002 and 2006.

PARTICIPANTS

145 midwives from six NHS Trusts.

INTERVENTIONS

a post-registration work-based module in perineal repair for midwives and alternative two hour in-service perineal repair workshops across five intervention Trusts.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

midwives' perceived level of competency and confidence undertaking perineal repair.

MAIN FINDINGS

significantly greater numbers of midwives were able to practice perineal repair at higher levels of competency following an educational intervention in five intervention Trusts (P<.006). There was a non-significant difference in the comparison Trust (P<.535). In addition, an educational programme for midwives increased the numbers of senior student midwives who were able to participate in perineal repair confidently under the direct supervision of their mentor when they perceived that their mentor was confident and competent undertaking the procedure.

KEY CONCLUSIONS

an educational programme in perineal repair can make a significant difference to the midwives' perceived level of competency and confidence when assessing and managing perineal trauma and repair.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

competency and expertise are complex phenomena and the data has provided greater insight into the complex nature of workplace learning alongside the multiple factors influencing clinical decision-making such as staff shortage, time constraints and inadequate numbers of midwives who are able to instruct, supervise and assess competency in perineal repair. Funding for training is fundamental for the sustainability of future practice development.

The dual influences of age and obstetric history on fecal continence in parous women

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether women who underwent forceps delivery were more likely than those who delivered either normally (spontaneous vaginal delivery [SVD]) or by cesarean to experience deterioration in fecal continence as they aged.

METHODS

The study investigated fecal continence assessment among women who gave birth to their first child 10, 20, or 30 years previously. Women who had undergone forceps delivery in the selected years were matched with women who had SVD in the same year. Two additional cohorts (1 premenopausal, 1 postmenopausal), who had only ever delivered by pre-labor cesarean, were identified for comparison.

RESULTS

Of the 85 women who participated, 36 had undergone forceps delivery, 35 SVD, and 14 cesarean delivery only. The mode of vaginal delivery had no significant effect on continence scores or manometry pressures. Premenopausal women who had undergone cesarean delivery had significantly higher manometry pressures than those who delivered vaginally, but this protective effect was lost after the menopause. Multivariate analysis of pudendal nerve conduction found that the adverse effect of duration since delivery was greater than the adverse effect of forceps compared with vaginal delivery.

CONCLUSION

Mode of delivery and aging affect pelvic floor function. Women who deliver via cesarean are not immune to age-related deterioration of anal sphincter function.

Classification and management of extensive obstetric perineal injuries in the Czech and Slovak Republics

OBJECTIVE

To assess the classification, repair, and follow up of extensive obstetric perineal injuries in the Czech and Slovak Republics.

METHODS

A survey conducted in 2009 using questionnaires distributed to obstetric departments regarding classification and management of obstetric perineal injuries.

RESULTS

Although 15 centers in the Czech Republic and 2 in the Slovak Republic indicated use of a 4-degree classification system, none of these centers reported using the classification accepted by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Use of a 3-degree classification system in accordance with definitions in Czech textbooks was reported by 14 Czech and 3 Slovak maternity hospitals. There was significant heterogeneity in clinical practice regarding techniques to repair extensive obstetric perineal injuries, antibiotic prophylaxis, early postpartum care, and follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

There is great inconsistency in the classification and management of extensive obstetric perineal injuries. Uniform recommendations should be created and accepted, not only in the Czech and Slovak Republics, but worldwide.

Diagnosis and management of obstetric anal sphincter injury

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to outline optimum practice in diagnosis and management of obstetric anal sphincter injury. The review focuses briefly on prevention of the problem before outlining diagnosis of sphincter injury as well as immediate and long-term management of patients who have sustained such injuries.

RECENT FINDINGS

Increasing vigilance is vital in order that sphincter injury is not overlooked; immediate radiological assessment may play a role in diagnosis. Optimum anal sphincter repair should be followed by oral laxative administration to maintain sphincter integrity. Biofeedback physiotherapy and sacral nerve stimulation show great promise in treatment of persistent symptoms. Optimum mode of delivery in future pregnancies is not clearly defined, and decisions should be individualized.

SUMMARY

Because obstetric injury to the anal sphincter mechanism cannot always be prevented, efforts must focus on limiting its occurrence, documenting its severity and providing optimum therapy to women who have sustained it. Management includes routine postnatal review of at-risk women and antenatal assessment in future pregnancies to limit deterioration in continence after future deliveries.

Internal anal sphincter defect influences continence outcome following obstetric anal sphincter injury

OBJECTIVE

To date, little correlation has been found between the extent of anal sphincter injury defined by endoanal ultrasound and symptoms of postpartum fecal incontinence. To define this relationship, we assessed a large cohort of women following first recognized obstetric anal sphincter injury.

STUDY DESIGN

In all, 500 consecutive women were studied at 3 months following primary repair of a first recognized obstetric anal sphincter injury sustained during vaginal delivery. Assessment included a standardized fecal incontinence questionnaire (modified Jorge-Wexner score), anal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound. Severe fecal incontinence was defined by a score greater than 9. Statistical significance of the relationship between symptoms and factors including age, parity, mode of delivery, and extent of sphincter injury (defined by endoanal ultrasound), was analyzed through multiple logistic regression.

RESULTS

Increasing age (P = .006) and parity (P = .039), instrumental delivery (P < .001), an anal canal resting pressure of < or = 35 mm Hg (P = .047), and internal anal sphincter (IAS) injury (P = .002) were significantly related to the presence of fecal incontinence. With multivariate analysis, and adjusting for other factors, instrumental delivery (OR 3.1; 95% CI 1.2-7.9) and IAS defect thickness (partial thickness defect > 1 quadrant or full thickness defect; OR 5.1 95% CI 1.5-22.9) were predictive of severe incontinence, but external anal sphincter defects were not.

CONCLUSION

Endosonographic evidence of IAS injury is predictive of fecal incontinence following obstetric anal sphincter injury. The presence of an IAS defect should be sought carefully if the anal sphincter is injured during vaginal delivery.

Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Anal incontinence is an embarrassing condition that is largely underreported. Obstetric anal sphincter injuries are the major etiological factor. Recognition of risk factors may minimize the development of sphincter injuries. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors for sphincter injuries and measure dimensions of mediolateral episiotomies.

METHODS

Women expecting their first vaginal delivery were invited to participate, and an experienced research fellow performed a perineal and rectal examination and classified tears according to the new international classification. Dimensions of episiotomies were measured and obstetric variables recorded prospectively.

RESULTS

Of the 241 women recruited, 59 (25%) sustained sphincter injuries. Univariate analysis revealed that forceps delivery OR 4.03 (1.63-9.92), vacuum extraction OR 2.64 (1.25-5.54), gestation > 40 weeks OR 3.18 (2.35-4.29), and mediolateral episiotomy OR 5.0 (2.64-9.44) were associated with these injuries. In addition, compared with women who had no injuries, sphincter injuries were more common with higher birthweight (3.51 vs 3.17 kg, p < 0.01), larger head circumference (34.3 vs 33.3 cm, p < 0.01), and longer second stage of labor (76 vs 51 min, p < 0.01). Multiple logistic regression revealed higher birthweight and mediolateral episiotomy OR 4.04 (1.71-9.56) as independent risk factors. Episiotomies angled closer to the midline were significantly associated with such injuries (26 vs 37 degrees, p = 0.01). No midwife and only 13 (22%) doctors performed truly mediolateral episiotomies.

CONCLUSIONS

Mediolateral episiotomy is an independent risk factor for anal sphincter injuries. Although a liberal policy of mediolateral episiotomy does not appear to reduce the risk of such injuries, it may be related to inappropriate technique. A concerted approach to educate trainees in appropriate episiotomy technique and identification of sphincter injuries is imperative to enable reexamination of the true merits or disadvantages of mediolateral episiotomy.

Recent impact of anal sphincter injury on overall Caesarean section incidence

INTRODUCTION

Because of increasing recognition of obstetric anal sphincter injury and faecal incontinence, we examined the recent impact of these indications on our institutional Caesarean section incidence.

METHODS

Retrospective review of the indications for multiparous Caesarean section was performed at the National Maternity Hospital for the 4 years 2000-2003, inclusive, to identify women in whom previous anal sphincter injury was an indication. Individual charts were reviewed and data regarding the nature and extent of previous anal sphincter injury were obtained.

RESULTS

Among 17 586 consecutive multiparous deliveries, previous anal sphincter trauma constituted the indication for Caesarean delivery in 67 women, representing 0.4% of all multiparae, 2.9% of multiparous Caesarean sections and 1.3% of all Caesarean sections performed. Fifty (85%) of the 67 women who opted for prelabour Caesarean delivery following previous obstetric anal sphincter injury had symptoms of faecal incontinence (mean continence score 5, range 1-17).

CONCLUSION

Notwithstanding recent increased awareness and documentation, anal sphincter problems represent a small influence on total Caesarean incidence.

Outcome of Second Delivery After Prior Macrosomic Infant in Women With Normal Glucose Tolerance

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to estimate the obstetric outcome of second delivery in women with normal glucose tolerance whose first fetus was macrosomic (fetal weight >/= 4,500 g).

METHODS

Primiparas delivering a macrosomic infant during the years 1997-2000 were identified from a hospital computer database, and the obstetric outcome of a second delivery was analyzed up until June 2003. A control group (birth weight 3,000-3,500 g) served for comparison.

RESULTS

Among 13,020 first pregnancies, 301 (2.3%) were macrosomic. A similar proportion in the macrosomic group, 156 of 301 (52%), and control group, 171 of 300 (57%), returned for second delivery (P = .252). Compared with controls, first macrosomic deliveries were characterized by higher rates of operative delivery, anal sphincter injury, and shoulder dystocia. At second delivery, 32% of neonates in the macrosomic group and 0.3% in the control group weighed 4,500 g or more (P < .001). More prelabor cesareans were performed in the macrosomic group compared with controls (27 of 156, 17.3%, compared with 8 of 171, 4.7%; P < .001). Among 104 women in the macrosomic group who labored after first vaginal delivery, 99% (103 of 104) delivered vaginally again compared with 44% (11 of 25) who labored after primiparous cesarean delivery (P < .001), which compares with 97% (146 of 150) and 77% (10 of 13), respectively, in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Despite a one-third recurrence of macrosomia, first vaginal delivery of a macrosomic infant was associated with a high incidence of second vaginal delivery. Conversely, primiparous macrosomic cesarean delivery conveyed a high risk (56%) for repeat intrapartum cesarean whether macrosomia recurred or not.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II-2.

Does the angle of episiotomy affect the incidence of anal sphincter injury?*

OBJECTIVE

Mediolateral episiotomy is associated with lower rates of significant perineal tears than midline episiotomy. However, the relationship between precise angle of episiotomy from the perineal midline and risk of third-degree tear has not been established. This study quantifies this relationship.

DESIGN

Case-control study.

SETTING

National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

SAMPLE

One hundred primiparous women who had undergone right mediolateral episiotomy 3 months previously.

METHODS

Two groups of primiparous women were compared. Cases had sustained clinically apparent anal sphincter injury during delivery, while controls had not. The angle of episiotomy measured from the midline was marked on a superimposed sheet of transparent plastic film and measured using a protractor. Data were analysed using Student's t test, chi-square test and logistic regression analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Angle of mediolateral episiotomy from the perineal midline.

RESULTS

Fifty-four cases and 46 controls were assessed. Cases were more likely to have undergone assisted delivery and consequently to have been delivered by an obstetrician than by a midwife. The mean angle of episiotomy measured significantly smaller in cases (30 degrees, 95% CI 28-32 degrees) than in controls (38 degrees, 95% CI 35-41 degrees; P<0.001). Analysis showed a 50% relative reduction in risk of sustaining third-degree tear for every 6 degrees away from the perineal midline that an episiotomy was cut.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that a larger angle of episiotomy is associated with a lower risk of third-degree tear and mediolateral episiotomy incisions should be made at as large an angle as possible to minimise the risk of sphincter disruption.

Differences in outcomes after third- versus fourth-degree perineal laceration repair: a prospective study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes after third- versus fourth-degree laceration repair.

STUDY DESIGN

Fifty-six primiparous women who sustained a third- or fourth-degree tear were enrolled at delivery and demographic and obstetric data were collected. At 6 weeks' postpartum, subjects completed a bowel function questionnaire and endoanal ultrasonography was performed. Fisher exact test and chi-square were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine women with third- and 17 with fourth-degree tears were enrolled. Subjects with fourth- were more likely to report bowel symptoms (59% vs 28%, P = .03), and to demonstrate persistent combined defects of the internal (IAS) and external anal sphincter (EAS) (48% vs 8%, P = .002) than third-degree tears. Combined defects were associated with the highest risk of bowel symptoms (OR 18.7, 95% CI 3-101, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Bowel symptoms were more common after fourth- than third-degree repair, and may be secondary to higher rates of combined defects of the IAS and EAS.

Obstetric anal sphincter injury ten years after: subjective and objective long term effects

OBJECTIVE

To establish the long term effects of obstetric anal sphincter rupture.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

University hospital in Sweden.

POPULATION

Eighty-two women from a prospective study from 1990 to compare anorectal function after third degree tear.

METHODS

Women completed a structured questionnaire, underwent a clinical examination and anorectal manometry, endoanal ultrasound (EAUSG) with perineal body measurement.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Symptoms of anal incontinence, sexual symptoms, anal manometry scores and evidence of sphincter damage on EAUSG.

RESULTS

Five women had undergone secondary repair and three were lost to follow up. Fifty-one women (80%) completed the questionnaire. Twenty-six out of 46 (57%) of the original study group and 6/28 (20%) of the original controls were examined. Incontinence to flatus and liquid stool was more severe in the study group than in controls. Flatus incontinence was significantly more pronounced among women with subsequent vaginal deliveries. Mean maximal anal squeeze pressures were 69 mmHg in the partial rupture group and 42 mmHg in the complete rupture group (P= 0.04). Study group women with signs of internal sphincter injury reported more pronounced faecal incontinence and had lower anal resting pressures (24 mmHg) than those with intact internal sphincters (40 mmHg) (P= 0.01). Perineal body thickness of less than 10 mm was associated with incontinence for flatus and liquid stools, less lubrication during sex and lower anal squeeze pressures (58 mmHg vs 89 mmHg, P= 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Subjective and objective anal function after anal sphincter injury deteriorates further over time and with subsequent vaginal deliveries. Thin perineal body and internal sphincter injury seem to be important for continence and anal pressure.

Patterns of abnormal pudendal nerve function that are associated with postpartum fecal incontinence

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess patterns of abnormal pudendal nerve function in women who complain of postpartum fecal incontinence.

STUDY DESIGN

During a 12-month period, a cohort of 83 women underwent neurophysiologic assessment as part of an evaluation of fecal incontinence after vaginal delivery. Pudendal nerve assessment consisted of the measurement of the clitoral-anal reflex and quantitative electromyography of the external anal sphincter. Endoanal ultrasound examination and anal manometry were also performed in each patient.

RESULTS

Thirty of 83 women (38%) with fecal incontinence were found to have abnormal neurophysiologic condition, among whom four identifiable patterns of abnormality emerged. Five women (17%) had evidence of pudendal nerve demylenation with a prolonged sensory threshold of the clitoral-anal reflex (>5.2 mA), although electromyography studies were normal. Eight women (27%) had abnormal electromyography results that were consistent with axonal neuropathy with or without reinervation, in whom the clitoral-anal reflex was normal. Thirteen women (43%) demonstrated a mixed demyelinating and axonal pudendal neuropathy, with evidence of reinervation. Four women (13%) had abnormal patterns of neurophysiologic condition that was not attributable directly to past obstetric trauma but to coincident medical problems.

CONCLUSION

Four abnormal patterns of pudendal nerve function may be identified, three of which (demyelinating, axonal, and mixed demyelinating/axonal) can be attributed to specific past obstetric events, although a fourth radicular pattern is due to coincident medical or orthopedic problems. Assessment of pudendal nerve function is important in women with postpartum fecal incontinence because particular patterns of abnormality correlate with different symptoms and can influence treatment options.

Obstetric perineal injury: risk factors and strategies for prevention

Fecal incontinence due to anal sphincter injury is the most important consequence of perineal trauma at vaginal delivery and may be of muscular or neurological origin. The risk of sphincter injury is increased at first delivery and in association with instrumental assistance, prolonged second stage, occipito-posterior position, and midline episiotomy, but is not predictable in individual cases. Injury can be prevented or minimized by enhancing uterine contractility during first labors, optimizing perineal repair technique, and by appropriate postnatal assessment of symptomatic women.

Cohort study of maternal views on future mode of delivery after operative delivery in the second stage of labor

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess maternal views on the future mode of delivery after either previous instrument vaginal delivery or cesarean delivery at full dilatation.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a prospective cohort study of 393 women with term singleton cephalic pregnancies.

RESULTS

More than one half of the cohort intended to have a further pregnancy, with no significant differences between the instrument vaginal delivery and caesarean delivery groups (51% vs 54% before discharge; adjusted odds ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.2, 6.0), and there was little change in maternal views over time. Women were more likely to aim for a future vaginal delivery after an instrument vaginal delivery (79% vs 39% before discharge; adjusted odds ratio, 4.5; 95% CI, 2.2, 9.2), but the proportion decreased over time (68% vs 42% at 1 year; adjusted odds ratio, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.6, 8.1). There were no significant differences in preferred future mode of delivery for women who had a caesarean delivery after a failed instrument delivery and those who were delivered by immediate caesarean delivery.

CONCLUSION

A high proportion of women who have had a previous difficult instrument vaginal delivery would still prefer vaginal delivery in a future pregnancy.