Y chromosome microdeletions in infertile men with varicocele

Role of Oxidative Stress in Varicocele

According to the official statistics of the World Health Organization, at least 48 million couples and 186 million people suffer from infertility. Varicocele has been recognized as the leading cause of male infertility and can affect spermatogenesis and cause testicular and epididymal disorders through multiple diverse pathophysiological processes. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced by oxidative stress have been reconciled as an important pathogenic factor throughout the course of varicocele. Testis respond to heat stress, hypoxia, and inflammation at the cost of producing excessive ROS. High levels of ROS can lead to infertility not only through lipid peroxidation or DNA damage, but also by inactivating enzymes and proteins in spermatogenesis. This review studies the oxidative stress and its role in the pathophysiology and molecular biology of varicocele in the context of a decline in fertility.

Y chromosome microdeletions and varicocele as aetiological factors of male infertility: A cross-sectional study

The pathogenic mechanisms by which varicocele disrupt spermatogenesis are not clearly understood. Over 30% of male infertility cases resulting from spermatogenic problems are associated with genetic abnormalities, and Y chromosome microdeletions are the second most frequent genetic cause. Here, we aimed to evaluate the frequency of Y chromosome microdeletion in infertile men with varicocele. A cross-sectional study comprising 51 infertile men with varicocele presenting spermatogenesis failures was performed. Y chromosome microdeletion research was made using polymerase chain reaction. Of the 51 men with infertility and varicocele, 35.3% (18/51) had nonobstructive azoospermia and 64.7% had severe oligozoospermia. Y chromosome microdeletion was found in two cases (3.9%): one patient had nonobstructive azoospermia and complete microdeletion of the AZFb and AZFc regions, and another patient had severe oligozoospermia and complete microdeletion of the AZFc region. Although in recent years, a genetic aetiology related to Y chromosome microdeletions has become a major cause of infertility in males with spermatogenesis failures, in this study, the varicocele was the clinical cause of seminal abnormalities that could lead to infertility, suggesting that both varicocele and Y chromosome microdeletion aetiologies can present, alone or combined, as factors of male infertility.

Clinical characteristics and treatment of azoospermia and severe oligospermia patients with Y-chromosome microdeletions

Clinical characteristics, testicular pathology, serum levels of reproductive hormones, and genetic analysis were compared among 100 azoospermic, 20 oligozoospermic cases with azoospermia factor (AZF) microdeletion, and 50 fertile males to evaluate the relationship between the AZF microdeletion regions and the azoospermia phenotype. AZF microdeletion region, testicular volume, and serum reproductive hormone levels of patients were compared against histological examination of testicular biopsies. The number of cases of AZFa, AZFb, AZFc, AZFb + c, and AZFa + b + c microdeletion was respectively 2 (1.7%), 15 (12.5%), 77 (64.2%), 24 (20.0%), and 2 (1.7%). The testicular volume of patient with AZF microdeletion was smaller (P < 0.01), while luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels were significantly higher than that of fertile individuals (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively). Among the patients, testicular volume with AZFb-microdeletion cases was larger compared to patients with AZFc or AZFb + c microdeletions (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively), whereas FSH levels were significantly lower than that of AZFc or AZFb + c microdeletions (P < 0.05). The Johnsen score of patients with an AZFb + c microdeletion was lower than that of patients with AZFb and AZFc microdeletions, but no significant difference was observed. Pathological findings of testicular biopsies poorly correlated with the pattern of AZF deletion, with the AZFc microdeletion exhibiting the most varied phenotypes. In subsequent assisted reproductive treatments, sperm from patients with an AZFc microdeletion that was obtained by testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) or microdissection testicular sperm extraction (m-TESE) were more likely to result in pregnancy. Combined with testis pathology pattern, the specific region of AZF microdeletion and hormonal assessments provide reliable prognostic information on the chance of successful sperm retrieval for assisted reproductive technologies.

Chromosomal Abnormalities and Y Chromosome Microdeletions in Infertile Men With Varicocele and Idiopathic Infertility of South Indian Origin

Various factors cause spermatogenesis arrest in men and, in a large number of cases, the underlying reason still remains unknown. Little attention is paid to determining the genetic defects of varicocele-related infertility. The objective of our present study was to investigate the chromosomal abnormalities and Y chromosome microdeletions in infertile men of South Indian origin with varicocele and idiopathic infertility. Metaphase chromosomes of 251 infertile men with varicocele and unexplained infertility were analyzed using Giemsa-Trypsin-Giemsa (GTG) banding and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The microdeletions in 6 genes and 18 sequence-tagged-sites (STS) in the Yq region were screened using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques. Out of 251 infertile men, 57 (22.7%) men were with varicocele, of which 8.77% were azoospermic, 26.31% were severely oligozoospermic, 21.05% were mildly oligozoospermic, and 43.85% were oligoasthenoteratozoospermic (OAT), and 194 (77.29%), with idiopathic infertility, of which 51% were azoospermic, 13.40% were severely oligozoospermic, 19.07% were mildly oligozoospermic, and 16.4% were with OAT. Genetic defects were observed in 38 (15.13%) infertile individuals, including 14 (24.56%) men with varicocele and 24 (12.37%) men with idiopathic infertility. The frequencies of chromosomal defects in varicocele and idiopathic infertility were 19.3% and 8.76%, respectively, whereas Y chromosome microdeletions were 5.26% and 3.60%, respectively. Overall rate of incidence of chromosomal anomalies and microdeletions in 251 infertile men were 11.5% and 3.98%, respectively, indicating a very significant higher association of genetic defects with varicocele than idiopathic male infertility. Our data also demonstrate that, among infertile men with varicocele, severely oligozoospermic and OAT men with varicocele have higher incidences of genetic defects than mildly oligozoospermic and azoospermic men.

The epidemiology and etiology of azoospermia

The misconception that infertility is typically associated with the female is commonly faced in the management of infertile men. It is uncommon for a patient to present for an infertility evaluation with an abnormal semen analysis report before an extensive female partner workup has been performed. Additionally, a man is usually considered fertile based only on seminal parameters without a physical exam. This behavior may lead to a delay in both the exact diagnosis and in possible specific infertility treatment. Moreover, male factor infertility can result from an underlying medical condition that is often treatable but could possibly be life-threatening. The responsibility of male factor in couple's infertility has been exponentially rising in recent years due to a comprehensive evaluation of reproductive male function and improved diagnostic tools. Despite this improvement in diagnosis, azoospermia is always the most challenging topic associated with infertility treatment. Several conditions that interfere with spermatogenesis and reduce sperm production and quality can lead to azoospermia. Azoospermia may also occur because of a reproductive tract obstruction. Optimal management of patients with azoospermia requires a full understanding of the disease etiology. This review will discuss in detail the epidemiology and etiology of azoospermia. A thorough literature survey was performed using the Medline, EMBASE, BIOSIS, and Cochrane databases. We restricted the survey to clinical publications that were relevant to male infertility and azoospermia. Many of the recommendations included are not based on controlled studies.

The role of varicocele treatment in the management of non-obstructive azoospermia

The literature on male reproductive medicine is continually expanding, especially regarding the diagnosis and treatment of infertility due to non-obstructive azoospermia. The advent of in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection has dramatically improved the treatment of male infertility due to nonobstructive azoospermia. Assisted reproduction using testicular spermatozoa has become a treatment of hope for men previously thought to be incapable of fathering a child due to testicular failure. In addition, numerous studies on non-obstructive azoospermia have reported that varicocelectomy not only can induce spermatogenesis but can also increase the sperm retrieval rate; however, the value of varicocelectomy in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia still remains controversial. The purpose of this review is to present an overview of the current status of varicocele repair in men with non-obstructive azoospermia.

Genetic evaluation of severe male factor infertility in Turkey: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency, types of chromosomal abnormalities and Y chromosome microdeletions in patients with severe male factor infertility, and the association between clinical background and genetic abnormality.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 322 infertile men; 136 men with severe oligozoospermia (sperm count <5 million/ml) and 196 with nonobstructive azoospermia were studied between April 2004 and November 2006 at the Dr. Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. Blood, semen samples, and testicular biopsies of patients were obtained. Hormonal analysis (follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and testosterone levels), semen analysis, karyotype analysis, and PCR screening for Y chromosome microdeletions were performed.

RESULT(S)

Forty-eight out of 332 (14%) infertile men had a genetic abnormality. Twenty-four (7.2%) cases with karyotype abnormality were detected. The frequencies of karyotype abnormalities were Klinefelter's syndrome 17/24 (71%), translocation 3/24 (12%), mix gonadal dysgenesis 2/24 (8%), XX male 1/24 (4%), and 46XYY 1/24 (4%). Twenty cases (6%) infertile men had only Y chromosome microdeletions. The frequencies of the deleted areas were azoospermia factor (AZF)c 42%, AZFb 25%, AZFa 21%, AZFb, c 8%, and AZFa, c 4%. Four of the cases with Y chromosome microdeletions also had a concurrent karyotype abnormality.

CONCLUSION(S)

All patients with nonobstructive azoospermia and severe oligozoospermia (sperm count <5 million/ml) should undergo genetic screening.

Analysis of azoospermia factor loci polymorphisms among Tunisian infertile men with varicocele

AIMS

The preponderance of experimental data from clinical and animal models demonstrates an adverse effect of varicocele on spermatogenesis. The review of the literature shows that there may be an underlying genetic etiology in varicocele. Here, we explore the Yq microdeletions among infertile men to evaluate their involvement in varicocele development and sperm production defect.

RESULTS

Microdeletions of 14 sequence-tagged-sites in the Yq11 region were screened in 210 infertile men using polymerase chain reaction techniques. Out of 210 infertile men, 69 (33%) men were with varicocele. Our results showed that the risk to develop varicocele is increased among infertile men with spermatogenesis (oligo-normospermia) (odds ratio = 3.57, confidence interval 95%: 1.49-8.84). However, we did not find any relationship between Y chromosome microdeletions and varicocele appearance (p = 0.73). In addition, a significant association was found between Y microdeletions and oligospermia (p < 10(-8)) or azoospermia (p < 10(-8)) using patients with normospermic characteristics as a control.

CONCLUSION

Our work showed the absence of relationship between Y chromosome microdeletions and varicocele development and the association of the two factors, independently, with sperm production defect.

The significance of Y chromosome microdeletion analysis in subfertile men with clinical variocele

INTRODUCTION

The aim of study is determining the cost-effectiveness of detection analysis in the presence of exceptional patients who have mild semen disorders, and beware of unnecessary varicocele repairs; and to ascertain whether patients with clinical varicocele should undergo Y chromosome (Yq) microdeletion analysis as a routine procedure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Varicocele with reflux was diagnosed in 51 male patients with subfertility symptoms upon physical examination (PE), confirmed by scrotal colour-Doppler ultrasound (CDU). After cytogenetic examination, Yq microdeletion analysis was performed on the peripheral blood samples using Promega Y Chromosome Deletion Detection System Version 2. Varicocele repair was performed under general anaesthesia with optical magnification (3-fold) through a subinguinal approach.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 27.9. Values of semen concentration ranged from 0 to 72 million/ml, motility from 0 to 65% (A + B) and Kruger from 0% to 18%. The PE revealed normal size and consistency in the bilateral testicles. All patients were cytogenetically normal. However, Yq microdeletion was detected in 2 patients, 1 with mild oligoteratozoospermia and partial AZFb deletion (sY121) and the second patient with severe oligozoospermia and partial AZFc deletion (sY254 and sY255), and they were not subjected to varicocelectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The routine performance of pre-operative Yq microdeletion analysis in patients with clinical varicocele does not seem to be cost-effective but the omission of patients with mild oligozoospermia would have subjected them to an unnecessary varicocelectomy and/or further ICSI applications and also would have caused the failure of referral for genetic counselling.

Recovery of spermatogenesis after microsurgical subinguinal varicocele repair in azoospermic men based on testicular histology

OBJECTIVE

Analyze whether testicular histologic patterns from a group of azoospermic men with varicocele is predictive of treatment outcome after subinguinal microsurgical varicocele repair.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventeen azoospermic men underwent bilateral open single testis biopsy and microsurgical subinguinal repair of clinical varicoceles.

RESULTS

Histopathology of testicular biopsies revealed hypospermatogenesis (HYPO) in 6 men, maturation arrest (MA) in 5, and Sertoli cell-only (SCO) in 6. Overall, presence of spermatozoa in the ejaculates was achieved in 47% (8/17) of men after varicocele repair, but only 35% (6/17) of them had motile sperm in their ejaculates. Only men with testicular histology revealing HYPO (5/6) or maturation arrest (3/5) had improvement after surgery. Median (25%-75% percentile) postoperative motile sperm count for both groups were 0.9 x 10(6)/mL (0.1-1.8 x 10(6)/mL) and 0.7 x 10(6)/mL (0.1-1.1), respectively (p = 0.87). The mean time for appearance of spermatozoa in the ejaculates was 5 months (3 to 9 months). One (HYPO) of 8 (12.5%) men who improved after surgery contributed to an unassisted pregnancy. Postoperative testicular biopsies obtained from patients who had no improvement after surgery revealed that testicular histology diagnosis remained unchanged. Successful testicular sperm retrieval for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was achieved in 4 of 9 (44.4%) individuals who did not improve after surgery, including 1 man with testicular histology exhibiting SCO.

CONCLUSIONS

Microsurgical varicocele repair in nonobstructive azoospermic men with clinical varicoceles can result in sperm appearance in the ejaculate when hypospermatogenesis or maturation arrest is found on testicular histology diagnosis.

Y chromosome microdeletions: are they implicated in teratozoospermia?

BACKGROUND

Y chromosome microdeletions are known to impair spermatogenesis. Screenings for these microdeletions are performed mostly in patients with sperm count abnormalities.

METHODS

We have screened the Y chromosome of 80 infertile patients with sperm morphological abnormalities. DNA from sperm, peripheral blood or single sperm following multiple displacement amplification (MDA) was utilized to amplify 20 specific sequence-tagged sites (STS) by PCR.

RESULTS

Y chromosome microdeletions were detected in sperm DNA from four of the teratozoospermic patients; while none of the 53 men with normal sperm morphology had any deletions. Two of the four patients with deletions also provided peripheral blood and a fresh semen sample. Both patients had none of the STS deleted in the peripheral blood DNA. Y chromosome microdeletion analysis in the MDA amplified SRY-positive single sperm DNA confirmed the presence of the same deletion in all 10 sperm for one patient and eight out of 10 sperm in the second patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Our observations suggest that some of the teratozoospermia might be related to gonadal mosaic Y chromosome microdeletions. Gonadal mosaicism can be a source of de novo transmissions of Y chromosome microdeletions. The application of MDA can yield enough DNA from a single sperm for genetic analyses.

Idiopathic non-obstructive azoospermia or severe oligozoospermia: a cross-sectional study in 61 Greek men

Idiopathic non-obstructive azoospermia or severe oligozoospermia (INOA) consists a special group of men characterized by eugonadism, primary infertility, low testicular volume, azoospermia or severe oligozoospermia and high follicle stimulating hormone values. Aims of this study were to describe the clinical, hormonal, sperm and histological characteristics of men with INOA and to define if and to what extend men with the INOA phenotype carry Y chromosome long arm (Yq) microdeletions. Sixty-three men with INOA were studied through clinical examination, spermiograms, hormonal profile, polymerase chain reaction for Yq microdeletions, karyotype and testicular fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Sixty-seven men with infertility of known causes and sixty fertile men served as controls. Men with INOA had significantly lower total testosterone levels than fertile men as well as higher prevalence of loss of libido, higher luteinizing hormone levels and lower sperm volume whereas men with infertility of known causes had intermediate values. The prevalence of Yq microdeletions was 3% in men with INOA, 3% in men with infertility of known causes (all of them with abnormal karyotype) and 0% in fertile men. In conclusion, men with INOA have more severe testiculopathy than these with infertility of known causes. These men may be at increased risk of developing partial androgen deficiency of the aging male.

Analysis of the DAZ gene family in cryptorchidism and idiopathic male infertility

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether partial deletions of the DAZ gene family on the Y chromosome are associated with cryptorchidism, similar to that found for complete AZF deletions.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 193 azoospermic and severely oligozoospermic men: 95 with a history of cryptorchidism and 98 classified as idiopathic.

INTERVENTION(S)

A two-part study for Y chromosome microdeletions was performed: a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based analysis for complete AZF deletions and partial DAZ gene analysis by PCR-restriction digestion assay for single-family variants.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Presence and type of AZF deletions and number of DAZ genes present.

RESULT(S)

The frequency of complete AZF deletions was similar in idiopathic (13.3%) and cryptorchid men (11.6%), but partial DAZ deletions were found only in infertile subjects without cryptorchidism (7.1%). The testicular phenotype was similar in men with complete AZF deletions and partial DAZ deletions, therefore the contribution of the other AZF genes in determining the spermatogenic impairment is still unclear.

CONCLUSION(S)

Our findings suggest that the loss of only some copies of DAZ is sufficient to lead to severe male infertility, but it is not a frequent finding in cryptorchid men.

Male infertility

Infertility affects 13-18% of couples and growing evidence from clinical and epidemiological studies suggests an increasing incidence of male reproductive problems. The pathogenesis of male infertility can be reflected by defective spermatogenesis due to pituitary disorders, testicular cancer, germ cell aplasia, varicocele and environmental factors or to defective sperm transport due to congenital abnormalities or immunological and neurogenic factors. Recent studies suggest an increased incidence of genetic disorders related to male infertility which may affect different levels, interfering with germ cell generation and maturation or leading to the production of non-functional spermatozoa. The identification of genetic causes of male infertility raises the issue of the transmission of defects to the offspring, a situation that is becoming more important given the increasing use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), a procedure in which the natural selection of the spermatozoa is by-passed. Fertilization can occur in vitro using ejaculated, epididymal or testicular spermatozoa, either fresh or frozen-thawed, providing opportunities hitherto not possible for men to be genetic fathers.

Varicocele: current concepts in pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment

Although significant advances have been made in the understanding of varicoceles, a clear pathophysiologic mechanism remains elusive. Most likely, a varicocele is the result of a multifactorial process. Appreciation of the complex venous drainage of the testis remains a key to maximizing the chances for treatment success. Likewise, the advent of microsurgical repair has minimized complications. Fortunately, times have improved since the early nineteenth century, when the French surgeon Delpech (1772-1832) was killed by a disgruntled patient on whom he had performed a varicocele repair.

Guidelines for the appropriate use of genetic tests in infertile couples

Research on genetic causes of male and female infertility rapidly expanded in the last years, following the development of in vitro fertilising techniques. Genetic tests are now available to explore the cause of the infertility and assess the risk of a given couple to transmit its genetic characteristics. This allows at-risk couples to take an informed decision when electing for a medically assisted reproduction. It also allows the professionals to offer a prenatal diagnosis when appropriate. Thus, the genetic work-up of the infertile couple has become good practice for an appropriate diagnosis, treatment and prognostic assessment. The lack of national or international rules for the genetic approach to the infertile couple, prompted the Italian community of professionals in the field of reproductive medicine to join and set up guidelines for the genetic diagnosis of male and female infertility. The group of clinical and research experts is representative of 12 national scientific societies and was supported by external experts from four international societies. We examine the clinically relevant genetic causes of male and female infertility and suggest the category of patients for which each genetic test is recommended or optional, both for an accurate diagnosis and prior to ART.

The pathophysiology of varicocele-associated male infertility

Varicocele is the most commonly identifiable, surgically correctable lesion associated with male-factor infertility. Surgical correction of a varicocele, whether unilateral or bilateral, results in improvement not only in semen parameters but also in spontaneous and assisted pregnancy rates. Varicoceles seem to induce a number of changes in the testicular microenvironment. These alterations in temperature, hemodynamics, and reactive oxidative species and antioxidant concentrations have been demonstrated to produce deleterious effects on spermatogenesis. However, despite current knowledge in the pathophysiology of varicocele-associated male infertility, the exact mechanism--or mechanisms--by which varicoceles impair fertility remains elusive. This review examines scientific evidence regarding the pathophysiology of varicocele-associated male infertility.

Y chromosome microdeletions and alterations of spermatogenesis

Three different spermatogenesis loci have been mapped on the Y chromosome and named "azoospermia factors" (AZFa, b, and c). Deletions in these regions remove one or more of the candidate genes (DAZ, RBMY, USP9Y, and DBY) and cause severe testiculopathy leading to male infertility. We have reviewed the literature and the most recent advances in Y chromosome mapping, focusing our attention on the correlation between Y chromosome microdeletions and alterations of spermatogenesis. More than 4,800 infertile patients were screened for Y microdeletions and published. Such deletions determine azoospermia more frequently than severe oligozoospermia and involve especially the AZFc region including the DAZ gene family. Overall, the prevalence of Y chromosome microdeletions is 4% in oligozoospermic patients, 14% in idiopathic severely oligozoospermic men, 11% in azoospermic men, and 18% in idiopathic azoospermic subjects. Patient selection criteria appear to substantially influence the prevalence of microdeletions. No clear correlation exists between the size and localization of the deletions and the testicular phenotype. However, it is clear that larger deletions are associated with the most severe testicular damage. Patients with Y chromosome deletions frequently have sperm either in the ejaculate or within the testis and are therefore suitable candidates for assisted reproduction techniques. This possibility raises a number of medical and ethical concerns, since the use of spermatozoa carrying Y chromosome deletions may produce pregnancies, but in such cases the genetic anomaly will invariably be passed on to male offspring.

Lack of evidence of a genetic origin in the impaired spermatogenesis of a patient cohort with low-grade varicocele

Varicocele is the most common clinical finding in infertile men but controversy continues to surround the utility of its treatment. An increased response of FSH to gonadotrophin-releasing hormone testing has been described in patients with varicocele, while the co-influence of Yq chromosome microdeletions in the infertility associated to this pathology is still under investigation. We studied 30 patients with first- and second-grade varicocele, 15 idiopathic oligozoospermic men and 21 age-matched healthy controls. All subjects underwent testicular Doppler ultrasonography, semen analysis, gonadotrophin-releasing hormone testing and baseline blood sampling for total and free testosterone, PRL, 17beta-estradiol, SHBG evaluation and Yq chromosome analysis. Apart from FSH, no difference in baseline hormonal levels was found between the groups. The patients with varicocele showed both an increased basal (p=0.007) and GnRH-induced FSH response (peak and AUC) (p=0.004) in comparison with the controls, while the idiopathic oligozoospermic men had only higher GnRH-induced FSH AUC (p=0.04). In the varicocele group, FSH peaks after GnRH testing correlated positively with the grade of disease (r=0.42, p=0.02) and negatively with sperm count (r=-0.50, p=0.005) and bilateral testis volume (r=-0.52, p=0.005). Sperm count and sperm motility were similarly significantly reduced both in patients with varicocele and in patients with idiopathic oligozoospermia in comparison with healthy controls. Yq chromosome analysis by sequence-tagged site PCR revealed no microdeletion in the AZF regions in any subject studied. Given the quite small number of subjects studied, our overall findings can only prompt us to suggest a possible causal role of varicocele in the impairment of spermatogenesis in our patients. Furthermore, although a genetic co-influence (i.e. Yq microdeletions) does not seem to be involved in the pathogenesis of infertility in men with varicocele and mild to moderate oligozoospermia, genetic screening seems to be advisable, especially in those patients who present a severe impairment of sperm count, as has been suggested by recent literature data.

Response to varicocelectomy in oligospermic men with and without defined genetic infertility

OBJECTIVES

To compare the clinical characteristics of infertile men who have varicocele with and without a genetic anomaly, and report the results of varicocelectomy in these two cohorts of men.

METHODS

Study subjects included 33 men who underwent genetic counseling and testing for a diagnosis of oligospermia with varicocele. Seven men were diagnosed with coexisting genetic infertility (genetic [+]; abnormal karyotype in 4, Y chromosome microdeletion in 3), and 26 men with varicocele and no genetic abnormality (genetic [-]). Five patients (Y chromosome microdeletions in 2, abnormal karyotype in 3) in the genetic (+) group and 14 patients in the genetic (-) group underwent microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy. Semen and hormonal parameters, physical examination findings, as well as the response to varicocele repair were compared between the two groups. Varicocele response was defined as a 50% increase in total motile sperm count in the ejaculate.

RESULTS

Mean preoperative seminal and hormonal parameters were not statistically significantly different between the two groups. Significant differences were observed in the volume of the right and left testicles between the two groups (left: P = 0.007; right: P = 0.04). Although 7 of 13 evaluable patients (54%) in the genetic (-) group had a seminal response to varicocelectomy, none of 5 patients in the genetic (+) group showed improvement in semen quality.

CONCLUSIONS

From this early experience, men with varicocele and genetic lesions appear to have a poorer response to varicocele repair than men without coexisting genetic lesions. These data may have implications for counseling male factor infertility patients contemplating varicocele treatment.