Conservative management of acute pseudo-obstruction in a major burn

Postburn Abdominal Pain of Gastrointestinal Origin: A Scoping Review

After burn injury, patients may have abdominal pain due to several causes and etiologies, some of which could be life-threatening, including pancreatitis, stress ulcers, Clostridium difficile infection, and so forth. This pain sometimes poses a major diagnostic challenge. This scoping review is the first reported review to address and discuss this entity of patients after burn injury in abdominal pain of gastrointestinal origin. A scoping review of PubMed, Google Scholar, and other electronic research sites was performed. All relevant articles of any study design were included in this review. Variables included in this study were sex distribution, age, related total burn surface area, incidence rate, characteristics of pain, diagnosis, management, outcomes, and mortality rate. The medical literature identified 114 articles. According to our inclusion criteria, 91 articles were reviewed in this article. Through these articles, we reviewed in detail the characteristics of postburn abdominal pain, the relevant diseases responsible for this complaint, the epidemiologic features of these diseases, and potential management approaches aiming to help burn specialists in making earlier diagnosis and, thus, timely treatment. Early recognition of postburn abdominal pain, as well as timely diagnosis and treatment, play a significant role in prognosis and mortality. Thus, it is extremely important for burn specialists and plastic surgeons to thoroughly investigate postburn abdominal pain. Also, one of the aims of this review was to shed light on the important role of the multidisciplinary team in burn patient management to improve the prognosis.

Management of the lower gastrointestinal system in burn: A comprehensive review

BACKGROUND

Burn produces complex gastrointestinal (GI) responses. Treatment, including large volume fluid resuscitation and opioid analgesia, may exacerbate GI dysfunction. Complications include constipation and opioid-induced bowel dysfunction (OBD), acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO), bacterial translocation and sepsis, and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). Contamination of perineal burns contributes to delayed healing, skin graft failure and sepsis and may impact upon morbidity and mortality. The authors carried out a literature review on management of the lower GI system in burn. This study aimed to explain: current prevention and treatment modalities; drawbacks and complications associated with available treatments, and to provide direction for development of best practice guidelines. ACS is associated with high mortality and should be treated with careful fluid resuscitation and diuresis, to minimise and remove oedema.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of English language literature was performed on PubMed, Medline and Embase. Both MeSH and keywords searches were used.

RESULTS

Evidence available on the management of lower gastrointestinal system in burn is summarised. Levels of evidence available are generally low (level III-IV).

CONCLUSION

Structured, graded interventions are required for prevention and treatment of constipation and OBD. Correction of electrolyte imbalance, adequate enteral intake and mobilisation are pre-requisites. Laxatives should be used according to World Gastroenterology Organisation recommendations. Resistant constipation may respond to changes in medication, but ACPO should be suspected and treated when present. Other complications, such as bacterial translocation and ACS are common in major burns. There is evidence that selective digestive tract decontamination reduces mortality and infectious episodes in major burns. ACS is associated with high mortality and should be treated with careful fluid resuscitation and diuresis. Surgery is reserved for non-responsive and severe cases. Perineal burns present challenges in wound and bowel management. Faecal management systems and negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) may improve wound control and hygiene, but diversion colostomy will still be beneficial in some cases. There is a clear need for rigorous studies to guide practice more effectively in these challenging conditions.

Pseudo-obstruction in the critically ill

Intestinal pseudo-obstruction is defined as a clinical syndrome characterized by impairment of intestinal propulsion, which may resemble intestinal obstruction, in the absence of a mechanical cause. It may involve the small and/or the large bowel, and may present in acute, subacute or chronic forms. We have performed a systematic review of acute pseudo-obstruction, also referred to as Ogilvie's syndrome in the literature, and focused on proposed mechanisms, manifestations and management of post-surgery and critically ill patients who suffer from one or more underlying clinical conditions. The hallmark of the syndrome is massive intestinal distension, which is detected on clinical inspection and plain abdominal radiography. The underlying pathophysiological mechanisms are not fully understood. Therefore, treatment focuses on preventing intestinal perforation, which is associated with an average 21% mortality rate.

Pseudo-obstruction in the critically ill

Intestinal pseudo-obstruction is defined as a clinical syndrome characterized by impairment of intestinal propulsion, which may resemble intestinal obstruction, in the absence of a mechanical cause. It may involve the small and/or the large bowel, and may present in acute, subacute or chronic forms. We have performed a systematic review of acute pseudo-obstruction, also referred to as Ogilvie's syndrome in the literature, and focused on proposed mechanisms, manifestations and management of post-surgery and critically ill patients who suffer from one or more underlying clinical conditions. The hallmark of the syndrome is massive intestinal distension, which is detected on clinical inspection and plain abdominal radiography. The underlying pathophysiological mechanisms are not fully understood. Therefore, treatment focuses on preventing intestinal perforation, which is associated with an average 21% mortality rate.

Manejo clínico de la seudoobstrucción aguda de colon en el enfermo hospitalizado: revisión sistemática de la bibliografía

Intestinal pseudoobstruction is a clinical syndrome characterized by impairment of intestinal propulsion, which may resemble intestinal obstruction, in the absence of a mechanical cause. It usually affects the colon but the small intestine may also be involved, and may present in acute, subacute or chronic forms. We have performed a systematic review of the acute form of pseudoobstruction, also referred to as Ogilvie's syndrome. We discuss proposed pathophysiological mechanisms, manifestations and management of this clinical condition in post-surgery and critically ill patients. The hallmark of the syndrome is massive intestinal distension, which is detected on clinical inspection and plain abdominal radiography. The underlying pathophysiological mechanisms are not fully understood. Therefore, treatment has focussed on preventing intestinal perforation, which is associated with a 21% mortality rate.

Acute Intestinal Pseudo-obstruction

Acute pseudo-obstruction may manifest clinically in one of three forms--acute gastroparesis, ileus, and acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (Ogilvie's syndrome). Though formerly associated primarily with the postoperative state, these entities are increasingly recognized in association with a wide variety of major medical problems. There are few controlled studies to guide the clinician in the management of these disorders. Treatment remains largely empirical, and time-honored, based primarily on "bowel rest," nasogastric decompression, and supportive care. While a wide variety of pharmacologic approaches have been advocated, few have been subjected to, or survived, the rigors of a properly controlled trial. Neostigmine is a notable exception, and has been shown to be effective in Ogilvie's syndrome. Perforation is a significant threat in megacolon; colonoscopic, or surgical decompression may, therefore, be indicated. Both are associated with significant risks in this context, but may prevent progression to perforation with its attendant mortality. New approaches seek to exploit current concepts in the pathophysiology of ileus and megacolon but have not, as yet, achieved efficacy in human studies.