Summation between acoustic and trigeminal stimuli evoking startle

A review of the neural basis underlying the acoustic startle response with a focus on recent developments in mammals

The startle response consists of whole-body muscle contractions, eye-blink, accelerated heart rate, and freezing in response to a strong, sudden stimulus. It is evolutionarily preserved and can be observed in any animal that can perceive sensory signals, indicating the important protective function of startle. Startle response measurements and its alterations have become a valuable tool for exploring sensorimotor processes and sensory gating, especially in the context of pathologies of psychiatric disorders. The last reviews on the neural substrates underlying acoustic startle were published around 20 years ago. Advancements in methods and techniques have since allowed new insights into acoustic startle mechanisms. This review is focused on the neural circuitry that drives the primary acoustic startle response in mammals. However, there have also been very successful efforts to identify the acoustic startle pathway in other vertebrates and invertebrates in the past decades, so at the end we briefly summarize these studies and comment on the similarities and differences between species.

Attribute capture underlying the precedence effect in rats

In a reverberant environment, humans with normal hearing can perceptually fuse the soundwave from a source with its reflections off nearby surfaces into a single auditory image, whose location appears to be around the source. This phenomenon is called the precedence effect, which is based on the perceptual capture of the reflected (lagging) sounds' attributes by the direct wave from the source. Using the paradigm of attentional modulation of the prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle reflex, with both the prepulse-feature specificity and the perceived-prepulse-location specificity, this study was to examine whether the perceptual attribute capture underlying the precedence effect occurs in rats. One broadband continuous noise was delivered by each of two spatially separated left and right loudspeakers with a 1-ms inter-loudspeaker delay. A silent gap was embedded in one of the two noises as the prepulse stimulus. The results showed that regardless of whether the gap was physically in the leading or lagging noise when the leading noise was either the left or right one, fear conditioning the gap enhanced PPI only when the leading noise was delivered from the loudspeaker that was the leading but not the lagging loudspeaker during the conditioning, indicating that due to the spatial specificity (either left or right) in the attentional enhancement of PPI, the perceived location of the conditioned gap was always on the leading side even though the gap was physically on the lagging side. Thus, rats have the same perceptual ability of attribute capture, thereby experiencing the auditory precedence effect as humans.

Lateral habenular norepinephrine contributes to states of arousal and anxiety in male rats

Recent research has identified the lateral habenula (LHb) as a brain region playing an important role in the production of stressful and anxiogenic states. Additionally, norepinephrine (NE) has long been known to be involved in arousal, stress and anxiety, and NE projections to the LHb have been identified emanating from the locus coeruleus (LC). The current research was devised to test the hypothesis that NE release within the LHb contributes to the occurrence of anxiogenic behaviors. Male rats were implanted with bilateral guide cannula aimed at the LHb and subsequently treated with intracranial (IC) infusions of the selective α2 adrenergic autoreceptor agonist, dexmedetomidine (DEX) (0, 0.5, 1.0 μg/side), prior to assessment of ambulatory and anxiogenic behavior in tests of spontaneous locomotion, open field behavior, and acoustic startle-response. Results demonstrated that DEX administration significantly reduced the overall locomotor behavior of subjects at both doses indicating that infusion of even small doses of this α2 agonist into the LHb can have profound effects on the subjects' general levels of alertness and activity. DEX was also found to attenuate anxiety as evidenced by a reduction in the magnitude of a startle-response to an acoustic 110 dB stimulus. Taken together, these results identify a role for NE release within the LHb in both arousal and anxiety.

Rapid cortisol enhancement of psychomotor and startle reactions to side-congruent stimuli in a focused cross-modal choice reaction time paradigm

The stress hormone cortisol has been shown to affect hemodynamic activity of human brain structures, presumably via a nongenomic mechanism. However, behavioral implications of this finding remain unknown. In a placebo-controlled, blinded, cross-over design the rapid effects of IV hydrocortisone (5mg) on cross-modal integration of simultaneous, unilateral visual and acoustic signals in a challenging startle and reaction time (RT) paradigm were studied. On two separate days 1 week apart, 24 male volunteers responded by button push to either up- or down pointing triangles presented in random sequence in the periphery of one of the visual hemi-fields. Visual targets were accompanied by unilateral acoustic startle noise bursts, presented at the same or opposite side. Saccadic latency, manual RT, and startle eye blink responses were recorded. Faster manual reactions and increased startle eye blink responses were observed 11-20 min after hydrocortisone administration when visual targets and unilateral acoustic startle noises were presented in the same sensory hemi-field, but not when presented in opposite sensory hemi-fields. Our results suggest that a nongenomic, cortisol-sensitive mechanism enhances psychomotor and startle reactions when stimuli occur in the same sensory hemi-field. Such basic cognitive effects of cortisol may serve rapid adaptation and protection against danger stimuli in stressful contexts.

Longterm-habituation of the startle response in mice is stimulus modality, but not context specific

In mice, the specificity of longterm-habituation (LTH) of startle was tested in two experiments. In two strains of mice (C57Bl/6 and C3H) there was pronounced LTH over 10 days of acoustic stimulation in two different contexts of startle measurement. (We found LTH to be greater after stimulation with 14 kHz sine stimuli compared to noise or tactile stimuli). A change of context showed LTH to be independent of context, i.e., startle LTH in mice is a non-associative learning process. In the second experiment, 9 days of acoustic or tactile stimulation were given to C57B/6 mice. Both stimulus modalities produced LTH. When on the 10th day stimuli of the other modality were given, in both cases the long term habituated group showed no lower startle amplitude than a non-stimulated control group. This indicates LTH is stimulus-modality specific. Altogether, our results show that in mice—very similar to rats—LTH of startle is stimulus modality, but not context specific. In addition we found two indications that the LTH action site is on the sensory branch of the startle circuit.

Blink reflex in patients with postparalytic facial syndrome and blepharospasm: trigeminal and auditory stimulation

OBJECTIVE

The enhancement of blink reflex (BR) excitability was shown in patients with postparalytic facial syndrome (PFS) and essential blepharospasm (EB). We prospectively investigated patients with PFS and EB whether BR alterations demonstrated by trigeminal stimulation will similarly be observed upon auditory stimulation.

METHODS

Fifteen patients with PFS, 15 patients with EB, and 30 healthy volunteers were involved. Electrically stimulated trigeminal BR and auditory BR were studied bilaterally.

RESULTS

The mean R2 amplitude and duration values were highest in EB patients, being significantly higher than PFS patients (p < 0.05) and control group (p < 0.01). The mean R2 duration in PFS patients were also significantly longer in compared to control group (p = 0.025). EB patients showed a higher mean R (auditory) amplitude and duration than PFS patients (p < 0.05) and controls (p < 0.04). The mean R (auditory) duration was longer on symptomatic side of PFS patients in compared to controls (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed that there is an enhanced excitability of BR circuit in postparalytic facial syndrome and essential blepharospasm, which could be evoked by auditory stimulation in addition to trigeminal stimulation.

SIGNIFICANCE

The enhanced excitability in patients with EB and PFS probably originates from the final common pathway of BR circuit, namely facial motor or premotor neurons.

The gap-startle paradigm for tinnitus screening in animal models: limitations and optimization

In 2006, Turner and colleagues (Behav. Neurosci., 120:188-195) introduced the gap-startle paradigm as a high-throughput method for tinnitus screening in rats. Under this paradigm, gap detection ability was assessed by determining the level of inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex produced by a short silent gap inserted in an otherwise continuous background sound prior to a loud startling stimulus. Animals with tinnitus were expected to show impaired gap detection ability (i.e., lack of inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex) if the background sound containing the gap was qualitatively similar to the tinnitus pitch. Thus, for the gap-startle paradigm to be a valid tool to screen for tinnitus, a robust startle response from which to inhibit must be present. Because recent studies have demonstrated that the acoustic startle reflex could be dramatically reduced following noise exposure, we endeavored to 1) modify the gap-startle paradigm to be more resilient in the presence of hearing loss, and 2) evaluate whether a reduction in startle reactivity could confound the interpretation of gap prepulse inhibition and lead to errors in screening for tinnitus. In the first experiment, the traditional broadband noise (BBN) startle stimulus was replaced by a bandpass noise in which the sound energy was concentrated in the lower frequencies (5-10 kHz) in order to maintain audibility of the startle stimulus after unilateral high-frequency noise exposure (16 kHz). However, rats still showed a 57% reduction in startle amplitude to the bandpass noise post-noise exposure. A follow-up experiment on a separate group of rats with transiently-induced conductive hearing loss revealed that startle reactivity was better preserved when the BBN startle stimulus was replaced by a rapid airpuff to the back of the rat's neck. Furthermore, it was found that transient unilateral conductive hearing loss, which was not likely to induce tinnitus, caused an impairment in gap prepulse inhibition as assessed with the traditional BBN gap-startle paradigm, resulting in a false-positive screening for tinnitus. Thus, the present study identifies significant caveats of the traditional gap-startle paradigm, and describes experimental parameters using an airpuff startle stimulus which may help to limit the negative consequences of reduced startle reactivity following noise exposure, thereby allowing researchers to better screen for tinnitus in animals with hearing loss.

Considerations for the use of a startling acoustic stimulus in studies of motor preparation in humans

Recent studies have used a loud (> 120 dB) startle-eliciting acoustic stimulus as a probe to investigate early motor response preparation in humans. The use of a startle in these studies has provided insight into not only the neurophysiological substrates underlying motor preparation, but also into the behavioural response strategies associated with particular stimulus-response sets. However, as the use of startle as a probe for preparation is a relatively new technique, a standard protocol within the context of movement paradigms does not yet exist. Here we review the recent literature using startle as a probe during the preparation phase of movement tasks, with an emphasis on how the experimental parameters affect the results obtained. Additionally, an overview of the literature surrounding the startle stimulus parameters is provided, and factors affecting the startle response are considered. In particular, we provide a review of the factors that should be taken into consideration when using a startling stimulus in human research.

Metabotropic glutamate subtype 5 receptors modulate fear-conditioning induced enhancement of prepulse inhibition in rats

Non-startling acoustic events presented shortly before an intense startling sound can inhibit the acoustic startle reflex. This phenomenon is called prepulse inhibition (PPI), and is widely used as a model of sensorimotor gating. The present study investigated whether PPI can be modulated by fear conditioning, whose acquisition can be blocked by the specific antagonist of metabotropic glutamate receptors subtype 5 (mGluR5), 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine (MPEP). The results show that a gap embedded in otherwise continuous noise sounds, which were delivered by two spatially separated loudspeakers, could inhibit the startle reflex induced by an intense sound that was presented 50 ms after the gap. The inhibitory effect depended on the duration of the gap, and was enhanced by fear conditioning that was introduced by temporally pairing the gap with footshock. Intraperitoneal injection of MPEP (0.5 or 5mg/kg) 30 min before fear conditioning blocked the enhancing effect of fear conditioning on PPI, but did not affect either the baseline startle magnitude or PPI if no fear conditioning was introduced. These results indicate that PPI is enhanced when the prepulse signifies an aversive event after fear conditioning. Also, mGlu5Rs play a role in preserving the fear-conditioning-induced enhancement of PPI.

Interaction between acoustic startle and habituated neck postural responses in seated subjects

Postural and startle responses rapidly habituate with repeated exposures to the same stimulus, and the first exposure to a seated forward acceleration elicits a startle response in the neck muscles. Our goal was to examine how the acoustic startle response is integrated with the habituated neck postural response elicited by forward accelerations of seated subjects. In experiment 1, 14 subjects underwent 11 sequential forward accelerations followed by 5 additional sled accelerations combined with a startling tone (124-dB sound pressure level) initiated 18 ms after sled acceleration onset. During the acceleration-only trials, changes consistent with habituation occurred in the root-mean-square amplitude of the neck muscles and in the peak amplitude of five head and torso kinematic variables. The subsequent addition of the startling tone restored the amplitude of the neck muscles and four of the five kinematic variables but shortened onset of muscle activity by 9-12 ms. These shortened onset times were further explored in experiment 2, wherein 16 subjects underwent 11 acceleration-only trials followed by 15 combined acceleration-tone trials with interstimulus delays of 0, 13, 18, 23, and 28 ms. Onset times shortened further for the 0- and 13-ms delays but did not lengthen for the 23- and 28-ms delays. These temporal and spatial changes in EMG can be explained by a summation of the excitatory drive converging at or before the neck muscle motoneurons. The present observations suggest that habituation to repeated sled accelerations involves extinguishing the startle response and tuning the postural response to the whole body disturbance.

Midbrain pathways for prepulse inhibition and startle activation in rat

The midbrain is essential for prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle reflex, but the exact neural circuits for PPI are not yet determined. Electrical stimulation of the superior colliculus (SC) or pedunculopontine tegmentum was used to characterize the neurons and pathways that mediate PPI and the activation of startle that also occurs at higher currents in the same sites. Startle was inhibited by prepulses in most, but not all SC sites, with the lowest intensity sites in intermediate layers of SC. PPI latencies in SC sites were 4-6 ms longer than in inferior colliculus, intercollicular nucleus or pedunculopontine sites. Contrary to previous serial models, there must be two parallel midbrain pathways for PPI, a faster auditory pathway from inferior colliculus to pedunculopontine tegmentum, and a slower multimodal SC output for PPI. Double-pulse stimulation of SC sites shows that PPI results from direct stimulation of neurons with moderate refractory periods (0.4-1.0 ms), similar to SC neurons that mediate contraversive turning responses. By contrast, startle activation occurring at higher currents in all SC sites (even sites where PPI could not be elicited) results from stimulation of very short refractory period neurons (0.3-0.5 ms) and very long refractory period neurons (1.0-2.0 ms), with startle inhibition often found from 0.5-1.0 ms. Startle activation appears to result from stimulation of short refractory period neurons in deep SC layers that mediate fear-potentiated startle, plus long refractory period substrates in more dorsal SC sites.

Emotion, motivation, and the brain: Reflex foundations in animal and human research

This review will focus on a motivational circuit in the brain, centered on the amygdala, that underlies human emotion. This neural circuitry of appetitive/approach and defensive/avoidance was laid down early in our evolutionary history in primitive cortex, sub-cortex, and mid-brain, to mediate behaviors basic to the survival of individuals and the propagation of genes to coming generations. Thus, events associated with appetitive rewards, or that threaten danger or pain, engage attention and prompt information gathering more so than other input. Motive cues also occasion metabolic arousal, anticipatory responses, and mobilize the organism to prepare for action. Findings are presented from research with animals, elucidating these psychophysiological (e.g., cardiovascular, neuro-humoral) and behavioral (e.g., startle potentiation, "freezing") patterns in emotion, and defining their mediating brain circuits. Parallel results are described from experiments with humans, showing similar activation patterns in brain and body in response to emotion cues, co-varying with participants' reports of affective valence and increasing emotional arousal.

Perinatal AZT exposure alters the acoustic and tactile startle response to 8-OH-DPAT and apomorphine in adult rats

The present study was designed to assess the dopaminergic and serotonergic contributions of the acoustic startle response (ASR) and the tactile startle response (TSR) in adult rats that had been perinatally exposed to AZT (azidothymidine, zidovudine; an antiretroviral agent). Each dam was randomly assigned to a treatment group: non-treated, AZT0, 100 or 150 mg/kg. Once daily gastric intubation began prenatally on gestational day (G) 19 and continued to G22 and then the pups were intubated between postnatal day (PND) 2-20. On PND60, animals were tested for responses to both acoustic and tactile stimuli following a challenge of vehicle, 0.25 or 0.5 mg/kg 8-OH-DPAT, a 5-HT(1A) agonist, or 0.75 or 2.0 mg/kg apomorphine (APO, a dopaminergic agonist) IP. Both DPAT and APO increased startle magnitude as expected. Additionally, perinatal AZT exposure enhanced startle responses following both DPAT and APO, an effect not due to perinatal handling or intubation. Similarly, perinatal AZT increased tactile responses following drug challenge in a gender-specific manner. Perinatal AZT also prolonged startle latencies, a change which may indicate that perinatal AZT alters conduction velocity. Therefore, the administration of AZT during the perinatal period results in long-term functional alterations within the startle reflex pathways.

Differences between somatosensory-evoked potentials recorded from the ventral posterolateral thalamic nucleus, primary somatosensory cortex and vertex in the rat

Somatosensory-evoked potential (SEP) components recorded over the primary somatosensory cortex (SI) and vertex in the rat within the 10-30 ms latency range were characterised with respect to the anatomy and function of the primary somatosensory pathway. To this aim, these components were compared to SEP components in the similar latency range recorded from the ventral posterolateral thalamic (VPL) nucleus, a nucleus known to be part of the subcortical structure of the primary somatosensory pathway and were described with respect to their stimulus-response characteristics and their response to the mu-opioid agonist fentanyl. The VPL positive (P)11-negative (N)18-P22 and SI P13-N18-P22 differed with respect to peak occurrence (P11 versus P13, respectively) and waveform morphology, but did not differ with respect to stimulus-response characteristics and their response to fentanyl. When compared to the vertex P15-N19-P26, the VPL P11-N18-P22 and SI P13-N18-P22 complex follow a relatively fast acquisition in stimulus intensity-response and were affected significantly less to increasing stimulus frequencies and to fentanyl. These results demonstrated that when compared to the VPL-SEP and SI-SEP, the Vx-SEP was modulated differently by the experimental conditions. It is suggested that this may be related to involvement of neural structures within different functional somatosensory pathways.

Opposite effects of tetanic stimulation of the auditory thalamus or auditory cortex on the acoustic startle reflex in awake rats

The amygdala mediates both emotional learning and fear potentiation of startle. The lateral amygdala nucleus (LA) receives auditory inputs from both the auditory thalamus (medial geniculate nucleus; MGN) and auditory association cortex (AAC), and is critical for auditory fear conditioning. The central amygdala nucleus, which has intra-amygdaloid connections with LA, enhances startle magnitude via midbrain connections to the startle circuits. Tetanic stimulation of either MGN or AAC in vitro or in vivo can induce long-term potentiation in LA. In the present study, behavioural consequences of tetanization of these auditory afferents were investigated in awake rats. The acoustic startle reflex of rats was enhanced by tetanic stimulation of MGN, but suppressed by that of AAC. All the tetanization-induced changes of startle diminished within 24 h. Blockade of GABAB receptors in the LA area reversed the suppressive effect of tetanic stimulation of AAC on startle but did not change the enhancing effect of tetanic stimulation of MGN. Moreover, transient electrical stimulation of MGN enhanced the acoustic startle reflex when it lagged behind acoustic stimulation, but inhibited the acoustic startle reflex when it preceded acoustic stimulation. The results of the present study indicate that MGN and AAC afferents to LA play different roles in emotional modulation of startle, and AAC afferents are more influenced by inhibitory GABAB transmission in LA.

Glutamate and GABAB transmissions in lateral amygdala are involved in startle-like electromyographic (EMG) potentiation caused by activation of auditory thalamus

The lateral amygdala nucleus (LA) receives auditory inputs from both the auditory thalamus (medial geniculate nucleus, MGN) and auditory association cortex (AAC). These auditory inputs are closely linked with glutamate and GABA(B) receptors in the LA. The LA has intra-amygdaloid connections with the central amygdala nucleus, which mediates auditory fear potentiation of startle (AFPS) via pathways to the startle circuits. The purpose of the present study was to establish an electromyographic (EMG) model for studying AFPS-related neural transmissions in the LA. Hind-limb startle-like EMG responses to single-pulse electrical stimulation of the trigeminal nucleus (TN) were recorded in anesthetized rats. These EMG responses were enhanced by single-pulse sub-threshold electrical stimulation of the MGN when the MGN stimulus led the TN stimulus at short inter-stimulus intervals (ISI). However, the EMG responses were not affected by single-pulse sub-threshold electrical stimulation of the AAC. Bilateral injection of the glutamate antagonist, kynurenic acid, into the LA decreased both the EMG enhancement caused by MGN stimulation at short ISIs and EMG responses to combined TN and AAC stimulation across various ISIs. Moreover, bilateral injection of the GABA(B) antagonist, phaclofen, into the LA increased both EMG responses to combined TN and MGN stimulation across various ISIs, and EMG responses to combined TN and AAC stimulation at short ISIs. These results suggest that the auditory inputs to the LA from the MGN and those from the AAC are affected differently by glutamate and GABA(B) receptors in the LA, and play differential roles in modulating startle responses.

Habituation of the acoustic and the tactile startle responses in mice: two independent sensory processes

To test whether habituation is specific to the stimulus modality, the authors analyzed cross-habituation between the tactile startle response' (TSR) and the acoustic startle response (ASR). The acoustic artifacts of airpuffs used to elicit the TSR were reduced by using a silencer and were effectively masked by background noise of 90-100 dB sound-pressure level. ASR was elicited by 14-kHz tones. TSR and ASR habituated in DBA and BALB mice: both the TSR and ASR habituated to a greater extent in DBA mice than in BALB mice. In both strains, habituation of the TSR did not generalize to the ASR, and vice versa. From this, the authors concluded that habituation of startle is located in the sensory afferent branches of the pathway.

Kynurenate in the pontine reticular formation inhibits acoustic and trigeminal nucleus-evoked startle, but not vestibular nucleus-evoked startle

The startle reflex is elicited by acoustic, trigeminal or vestibular stimulation, or by combinations of these stimuli. Acoustic startle is mediated largely by ibotenate-sensitive neurons in the ventrocaudal pontine reticular formation (PnC). In these studies we tested whether startle elicited by stimulation of different modalities is affected by infusion of the non-selective glutamate antagonist, kynurenate, into the PnC. In awake rats, startle responses evoked by either acoustic or spinal trigeminal nucleus stimulation were inhibited by kynurenate, but not saline, infusions, with the most effective placements nearest PnC. In chloral hydrate-anesthetized rats, kynurenate in the PnC reduced trigeminal nucleus-evoked hindlimb EMG responses, but not vestibular nucleus-evoked startle. Kynurenate in the vestibular nucleus had no effect on trigeminal nucleus-evoked startle. These results indicate that trigeminal nucleus stimulation evokes startle largely through glutamate receptors in the PnC, similarly to acoustic startle, but vestibular nucleus-evoked startle is mediated through other pathways, such as the vestibulospinal tract.

Cellular mechanisms of the trigeminally evoked startle response

The startle response is an important mammalian model for studying the cellular mechanisms of emotions and of learning. It consists of contractions of facial and skeletal muscles in response to sudden acoustic, tactile or vestibular stimuli. Whereas the acoustic startle pathway is well described, only a few recent studies have investigated the tactile startle pathway. It was proposed that there is a direct projection from the principal sensory nucleus to the central sensorimotor interface of the startle response, which is formed by the giant neurons in the caudal pontine reticular formation. We explored this projection in greater detail in vitro. Anterograde tracing in rat brain slices confirmed projections with large axon terminals from the ventral part of the principal sensory nucleus to the lateral caudal pontine reticular formation. Electrophysiological studies revealed a monosynaptic glutamatergic connection between principal sensory nucleus neurons and caudal pontine reticular formation giant neurons. The synapses displayed paired-pulse facilitation at high-frequency stimulation, and homosynaptic depression at 1 Hz stimulation. The latter form of plasticity is thought to underlie habituation of the startle response. Furthermore, postsynaptic currents in caudal pontine reticular formation giant neurons evoked by principal sensory nucleus neuron stimulation summed in a linear way with signals evoked by stimulation of auditory afferents. Synaptic plasticity and summation of synaptic currents correspond well with in vivo data previously published by other groups. We thus presume that these synapses mediate trigeminal input to the startle pathway.

Electrolytic, but not neurotoxic, lesions to the lateral tegmental tract increase acoustic startle amplitude and reduce startle stimulus-induced freezing

Startle amplitude and startle stimulus-induced freezing (an index of fear) were measured in a standard acoustic startle response (ASR) paradigm in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Groups with electrolytic lesions to the lateral tegmental tract (LTG) or with axon-sparing lesions to the area around LTG made with the neurotoxin NMDA were compared with vehicle-injected or sham operated control groups on these response measures. Replicating previous results (Leaton & Brucato, 2001), electrolytic lesions to LTG significantly reduced freezing and produced a persistent 300% increase in ASR amplitude compared with all other groups. The NMDA lesions had no effect on freezing or on ASR amplitude compared with the controls. In additional testing the rats with electrolytic lesions to LTG did not differ from controls in the acquisition or retention of context freezing using a footshock unconditioned stimulus. The data made a small, but necessary, step in further clarifying two pathways that modify ASR. The source of the descending pathway that provides tonic inhibition of the sensory input to the ASR circuitry is not within the LTG. The ascending pathway that carries the fear-inducing dimensions of the acoustic stimulus to the amygdala by way of the medial geniculate nucleus does not have an intermediate synapse in the area within LTG.

Enhancement of electrically evoked startle-like responses by tetanic stimulation of the superior colliculus

Single-pulse unilateral electrical stimulation of either the amygdala or the inferior colliculus elicited startle-like responses in chloral hydrate anesthetized rats. EMG responses to intracranial stimulation were recorded from the anterior biceps femoris muscles. The EMG responses were generally enhanced following unilateral tetanic stimulation of the deep layers of the superior colliculus, but the enhancement was stronger for amygdala sites than inferior colliculus sites. The enhancement of EMG responses to ipsilateral amygdala stimulation was much larger than that for contralateral amygdala stimulation and that for ipsilateral inferior colliculus stimulation. The enhancement of EMG responses to contralateral inferior colliculus stimulation was not significant. The present study provides a motor-output model for studying plasticity in the neural pathways mediating startle facilitation.

Contributions of the vestibular nucleus and vestibulospinal tract to the startle reflex

The startle reflex is elicited by strong and sudden acoustic, vestibular or trigeminal stimuli. The caudal pontine reticular nucleus, which mediates acoustic startle via the reticulospinal tract, receives further anatomical connections from vestibular and trigeminal nuclei, and can be activated by vestibular and tactile stimuli, suggesting that this pontine reticular structure could mediate vestibular and trigeminal startle. The vestibular nucleus, however, also projects to the spinal cord directly via the vestibulospinal tracts, and therefore may mediate vestibular startle via additional faster routes without a synaptic relay in the hindbrain. In the present study, the timing properties of the vestibular efferent pathways mediating startle-like responses were examined in rats using electrical stimulation techniques. Transient single- or twin-pulse electrical stimulation of the vestibular nucleus evoked bilateral, startle-like responses with short refractory periods. In chloral hydrate-anesthetized rats, hindlimb electromyogram latencies recorded from the anterior biceps femoris muscle were shorter than those for stimulation of the trigeminal nucleus, and similar to those for stimulation of the caudal pontine reticular nucleus or ventromedial medulla. In awake rats, combining vestibular nucleus stimulation with either acoustic stimulation or trigeminal nucleus stimulation enhanced the whole-body startle-like responses and led to strong cross-modal summation without collision effects. In both chloral hydrate-anesthetized and awake rats, combining vestibular nucleus stimulation with ventromedial medulla stimulation produced a symmetrical collision effect, i.e. a loss of summation at the same positive and negative stimulus intervals, indicating a continuous connection between the vestibular nucleus and ventromedial medulla in mediating vestibular startle. By contrast, combining trigeminal nucleus stimulation with ventromedial medulla stimulation resulted in an asymmetric collision effect when the trigeminal nucleus stimulation preceded ventromedial medulla stimulation by 0.5 ms, suggesting that a monosynaptic connection between the trigeminal nucleus and ventromedial medulla mediates trigeminal startle. We propose that the vestibulospinal tracts participate strongly in mediating startle produced by activation of the vestibular nucleus. The convergence of the vestibulospinal tracts with the reticulospinal tract within the spinal cord therefore provides the neural basis of cross-modal summation of startling stimuli.

The superior olivary complex is necessary for the full expression of the acoustic but not tactile startle response in rats

The acoustic startle response (ASR) in rats is mediated by an oligosynaptic pathway from the cochlea via the brainstem to spinal and cranial motoneurons. The present study tested whether the superior olivary complex (SOC) plays a role in the mediation of the ASR. The SOC receives auditory information from the ventral cochlear nuclei and projects to the caudal pontine reticular nucleus (PnC), the sensorimotor interface of the ASR. Axon-sparing excitotoxic lesions of the SOC strongly reduced the ASR amplitude and slightly prolonged ASR onset and peak latencies. The integrity of PnC which is adjacent to the SOC was confirmed by testing the tactile startle response which was not affected by SOC lesions. We suggest that the SOC is necessary for a full expression of the ASR and discuss possible auditory input structures involved in the mediation of the ASR.

Azimuthal directional sensitivity of prepulse inhibition of the pinna startle reflex in decerebrate rats

Previous studies have indicated that the auditory midbrain, the inferior colliculus, is important for both sound localization and mediation of prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex. The present study investigated the azimuthal directional sensitivity of prepulse inhibition of the pinna startle reflex in decerebrate rats. The pinna startle reflex was measured by recording multi-unit action potentials from the cervicoauricular muscles. The startling noise burst (94 dB SPL) was produced by a stationary speaker at 0 degrees azimuth, and the non-startling prepulse noise burst (46 dB SPL) was produced by a movable speaker whose direction was changed in the frontal azimuthal plane. The interval between the onset of the prepulse sound and the onset of the startling sound was 100 ms. The pinna reflex to the startling sound was strongly inhibited by the prepulse sound, and the inhibited startle response exhibited a flat azimuthal directional curve. In addition to further confirming that the neural pathways mediating prepulse inhibition are located in the brainstem, the present results indicate that interaural disparities of binaural inputs used for sound localization are not capable of modulating prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex.

Effects of bilateral electrical stimulation of the ventral pallidum on acoustic startle

The ventral pallidum (VP) is believed to occupy a critical position between the limbic and the motor systems, for transferring motive information into motor commands. To estimate the time course of signaling from the VP to motor outputs, in the present study we examined the effects of bilateral electrical stimulation of the VP on the acoustic startle reflex in awake rats. When the interstimulus interval (ISI) between VP stimulation and acoustic stimulation was shorter than 5 ms, VP stimulation potentiated acoustic startle. When the ISI was longer than 5 ms, VP stimulation inhibited acoustic startle over a large range of ISIs with the maximum inhibition at ISIs between 15 and 25 ms. In contrast, bilateral electrical stimulation of the amygdala did not have a significant inhibitory effect on acoustic startle, but strongly augmented acoustic startle at shorter ISIs (0-10 ms). Compared to unilateral electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus (IC), bilateral stimulation of the VP gave rise to a rightward shift of the ISI curve, indicating that the neural pathways conveying the inhibitory influence from the VP to the acoustic startle circuit are longer than those from the IC.

Cochlear and trigeminal systems contributing to the startle reflex in rats

The startle reflex is evoked by strong acoustic or tactile stimuli, or by electrical stimulation of acoustic or tactile pathways. To dissociate the contributions of acoustic and tactile pathways, stimulating electrodes were placed in adjacent cochlear and trigeminal nuclei. The currents needed to evoke startle-like responses were an order of magnitude lower in ventral trigeminal sites (12-80 microA for a 0.1-ms pulse) than in cochlear nucleus sites (150-800 microA). At low threshold sites in both areas, brief acoustic stimuli were followed 0-4 ms later by a single electrical pulse and the current required to evoke startle was measured at several interstimulus intervals. Summation between the acoustic and electrical stimuli for startle was strong in both cochlear and trigeminal sites. Collision effects were found in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus when the electrical stimulus followed the ipsilateral acoustic stimulus by 2.0 ms, suggesting that acoustic startle is mediated by axons in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus. Collision effects were found at 4.0 ms if the electrical stimulus was presented in the contralateral pontine reticular formation, suggesting that acoustic signals mediating startle mainly cross to the pontine reticular formation. Collision effects were not found in medial or posterior sites in the cochlear nucleus, or trigeminal sites, suggesting that the neurons that mediate startle in these sites do not mediate acoustic startle. Therefore, acoustic startle is mediated through high threshold cochlear nucleus sites, while low threshold sites are non-acoustic, probably as a result of trigeminal or vestibular stimulation.