The clinical utility of the percent of positive prostate biopsies in predicting biochemical outcome following external-beam radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer

The prognosis of patients with prostate cancer receiving permanent seed implantation stratified by prostate volume: Should we be reluctant to treat with brachytherapy because of a very small prostate (<15 cc)?

PURPOSE

We evaluated the treatment outcomes of different prostate volumes (PVs), <15 cc, 15-20 cc, and > 20 cc, in patients with prostate cancer who underwent permanent seed implantation (PI) ± external beam radiation therapy ± hormone therapy in a national Japanese prospective cohort study (J-POPS).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Of the 6721 patients in J-POPS from 2005 to 2011, 6652 were included in the analysis population. We categorized the patients into the following three PV groups: <15 cc, 15-20 cc, and > 20 cc. We evaluated the effect of PV on biochemical freedom from failure (bFFF), prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), and all-cause mortality (ACM) using the Phoenix definition and Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 60.0 months. Patients in each PV group was 491 (7.4%), 1118 (16.8%), and 5043 (75.8%), respectively. No difference was observed in bFFF (94.7%, 96.2%, and 95.7%, p = 0.407), PCSM (99.8%, 99.7%, and 99.8%, p = 0.682), and ACM (98.2%, 96.7%, and 97.2%, p = 0.119) at 5 years for each PV group. In univariate and multivariate analyses, PV was not associated with bFFF, PCSM, ACM, or grade 2 toxicity. The percentage of positive biopsies was the single most significant predictor for all treatment outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results obtained by analyzing a very large Japanese prospective database showed no difference in treatment outcomes according to PV (<15 cc, 15-20 cc, and ˃20 cc). Our study confirmed that PI in small prostates (even < 15 cc) remains an effective treatment option.

ACR-ABS-ASTRO Practice Parameter for Transperineal Permanent Brachytherapy of Prostate Cancer

AIM/OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND

The American College of Radiology (ACR), American Brachytherapy Society (ABS), and American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) have jointly developed the following practice parameter for transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer. Transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer is the interstitial implantation of low-dose rate radioactive seeds into the prostate gland for the purpose of treating localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

This practice parameter was developed according to the process described under the heading The Process for Developing ACR Practice Parameters and Technical Standards on the ACR website (https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Practice-Parameters-and-Technical-Standards) by the Committee on Practice Parameters-Radiation Oncology of the Commission on Radiation Oncology, in collaboration with ABS and ASTRO.

RESULTS

This practice parameter provides a framework for the appropriate use of low-dose rate brachytherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer either as monotherapy or as part of a treatment regimen combined with external-beam radiation therapy. The practice parameter defines the qualifications and responsibilities of all involved radiation oncology personnel, including the radiation oncologist, medical physicist, dosimetrist, radiation therapist, and nursing staff. Patient selection criteria and the utilization of supplemental therapies such as external-beam radiation therapy and androgen deprivation therapy are discussed. The logistics of the implant procedure, postimplant dosimetry assessment, and best practices with regard to safety and quality control are presented.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to established standards can help to ensure that permanent prostate brachytherapy is delivered in a safe and efficacious manner.

Brachytherapy focal dose escalation using ultrasound based tissue characterization by patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer: Five-year results from single-center phase 2 trial

PURPOSE

This prospective trial investigates side effects and efficacy of focal dose escalation with brachytherapy for patients with prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In the Phase II, monocentric prospective trial 101 patients with low-/intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer were enrolled between 2011 and 2013. Patients received either PDR-/HDR-brachytherapy alone with 86-90 Gy (EQD2, α/β = 3 Gy) or PDR-/HDR-brachytherapy as boost after external beam radiation therapy up to a total dose of 91-96 Gy (EQD2, α/β = 3 Gy). Taking place brachytherapy all patients received the simultaneous integrated focal boost to the intra-prostatic tumor lesions visible in computer-aided ultrasonography (HistoScanning™) - up to a total dose of 108-119 Gy (EQD2, α/β = 3 Gy). The primary endpoint was toxicity. Secondary endpoints were cumulative freedom from local recurrence, PSA-free survival, distant metastases-free survival, and overall survival. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01409876.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 65 months. Late toxicity was generally low with only four patients scoring urinary grade 3 toxicity (4/101, 4%). Occurrence of any grade of late rectal toxicities was very low. We did not register any grade ≥2 of late rectal toxicities. The cumulative 5 years local recurrence rate (LRR) for all patients was 1%. Five years- biochemical disease-free survival estimates according Kaplan-Meier were 98,1% and 81,3% for low-/intermediate-risk and high-risk patients, respectively. Five years metastases-free survival estimates according Kaplan-Meier were 98,0% and 83,3% for all patients, low-/intermediate-risk and high-risk patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The 5 years-results from this Phase II Trial show that focal dose escalation with computer-aided ultrasonography and brachytherapy for patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer is safe and effective.

Comparison of Tumor Volume Parameters on Prostate Cancer Biopsies

CONTEXT.—

Prostate biopsy reports require an indication of prostate cancer volume. No consensus exists on the methodology of tumor volume reporting.

OBJECTIVE.—

To compare the prognostic value of different biopsy prostate cancer volume parameters.

DESIGN.—

Prostate biopsies of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer were reviewed (n = 1031). Tumor volume was quantified in 6 ways: average estimated tumor percentage, measured total tumor length, average calculated tumor percentage, greatest tumor length, greatest tumor percentage, and average tumor percentage of all biopsies. Their prognostic value was determined by using either logistic regression for extraprostatic expansion (EPE) and surgical margin status after radical prostatectomy (RP), or Cox regression for biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) after RP (n = 406) and radiation therapy (RT) (n = 508).

RESULTS.—

All tumor volume parameters were significantly mutually correlated (R2 > 0.500, P < .001). None were predictive for EPE, surgical margin, or BCRFS after RP in multivariable analysis, including age, prostate-specific antigen, number of positive biopsies, and grade group. In contrast, all tumor volume parameters were significant predictors for BCRFS (all P < .05) and DSS (all P < .05) after RT, except greatest tumor length. In multivariable analysis including only all tumor volume parameters as covariates, calculated tumor length was the only predictor for EPE after RP (P = .02) and DSS after RT (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS.—

All tumor volume parameters had comparable prognostic value and could be used in clinical practice. If tumor volume quantification is a threshold for treatment decision, calculated tumor length seems preferential, slightly outperforming the other parameters.

[Percutaneous MR-guided prostate cancer cryoablation: Predictive factors and oncologic outcomes]

OBJECTIVE

To determine the pejorative predictive factors on oncologic outcomes of percutaneous MR-guided whole gland prostate cancer cryoablation (CA).

METHODS

Medical records of patients treated from 2009 to 2012, to assess medium-term oncologic outcomes, were reviewed. Prostate biopsies were performed in local recurrence suspicion (biochemical failure, MR follow-up failure).

RESULTS

Among 18 patients, mean age of 72.6 (61-78), 2 (11 %) and 7 (38.9 %) biological and reported biopsy-proven local recurrence respectively with our initial technic of CA. Mean follow-up and recurrence were 56.3 (±21.7) and 20.7 (±13.9) months respectively. A previous treatment of prostate cancer (P=0.5), pre-treatment PSA (P=0.2), pre-treatment Gleason/ISUP score (P=0.4), nadir PSA post-CA (P=0.22) were not associated with recurrence. Bilateral positive cores appears as a pejorative predictive factor (P=0.04). However mean pre-treatment positive cores percentage, 25 (±16.5) in responding patients versus 40.7 (±25.2) in case of recurrence, and maximum percentage of cancer extent in each positive core, 10.6 (±9.3) in responding patients versus 18.7 (±16.5) in case of recurrence, seemed associated with local recurrence after prostate CA but our analysis wasn't able to find a difference (P=0.09 and P=0.3 respectively) due to a lack of power.

CONCLUSION

Bilateral positive cores appears as a pejorative predictive factor. In our experience, important tumor volume seem to be a pejorative predictive factor for oncologic outcomes after PCA whereas treatment, PSA, Gleason/ISUP score, nadir PSA are not.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Advancing Age and the Odds of Upgrading and Upstaging at Radical Prostatectomy in Men with Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

To identify a subset of men with Gleason score (GS) 6 prostate cancer who are at high risk for upgrading/upstaging who should be recommended for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1992 and 2017, a total of 3571 men with GS6 prostate cancer were consecutively treated at a single institution with radical prostatectomy. Logistic regression multivariable analyses to determine the odds of upgrading and upstaging were performed, adjusting for age and year of diagnosis, clinical T category, prostate-specific antigen level, number of biopsy cores, and percentage of positive biopsy cores.

RESULTS

Of 3571 men, the disease of 115 (3.22%), 245 (6.86%), and 254 (7.11%) was upgraded, was upstaged, or had positive surgical margins (R1), respectively. Older age at diagnosis was associated with an increased risk of upgrading disease to GS7 or higher, prostatectomy T3/T4, and R1 with adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 1.05 (1.01-1.08; P = .005), 1.02 (1.00-1.05; P = .048), and 1.02 (1.002-1.05; P = .03), respectively. Older age was associated with an increasing proportion of men with disease upgraded to GS7 or higher (T1c: P = .002; T2 or higher: P = .04) or upstaged to pT3/4 or pT2R1 (T1c: P = .02; T2 or higher: P = .02) among men with ≥ 33% but not < 33% positive biopsy cores.

CONCLUSION

Before initiating active surveillance, performing multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in otherwise healthy older men with GS6 prostate cancer and ≥ 33% positive biopsy cores should be considered.

Beyond D'Amico risk classes for predicting recurrence after external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: the Candiolo classifier

Background

The aim of this work is to develop an algorithm to predict recurrence in prostate cancer patients treated with radical radiotherapy, getting up to a prognostic power higher than traditional D’Amico risk classification.

Methods

Two thousand four hundred ninety-three men belonging to the EUREKA-2 retrospective multi-centric database on prostate cancer and treated with external-beam radiotherapy as primary treatment comprised the study population. A Cox regression time to PSA failure analysis was performed in univariate and multivariate settings, evaluating the predictive ability of age, pre-treatment PSA, clinical-radiological staging, Gleason score and percentage of positive cores at biopsy (%PC). The accuracy of this model was checked with bootstrapping statistics. Subgroups for all the variables’ combinations were combined to classify patients into five different “Candiolo” risk-classes for biochemical Progression Free Survival (bPFS); thereafter, they were also applied to clinical PFS (cPFS), systemic PFS (sPFS) and Prostate Cancer Specific Survival (PCSS), and compared to D’Amico risk grouping performances.

Results

The Candiolo classifier splits patients in 5 risk-groups with the following 10-years bPFS, cPFS, sPFS and PCSS: for very-low-risk 90 %, 94 %, 100 % and 100 %; for low-risk 74 %, 88 %, 94 % and 98 %; for intermediate-risk 60 %, 82 %, 91 % and 92 %; for high-risk 43 %, 55 %, 80 % and 89 % and for very-high-risk 14 %, 38 %, 56 % and 70 %. Our classifier outperforms D’Amico risk classes for all the end-points evaluated, with concordance indexes of 71.5 %, 75.5 %, 80 % and 80.5 % versus 63 %, 65.5 %, 69.5 % and 69 %, respectively.

Conclusions

Our classification tool, combining five clinical and easily available parameters, seems to better stratify patients in predicting prostate cancer recurrence after radiotherapy compared to the traditional D’Amico risk classes.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13014-016-0599-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Primary radical therapy selection in high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer

As the incidence of prostate cancer rises, the detection and management of men with high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer is becoming increasingly important. The benefits of radical treatment have been clearly shown in this group from a number of publications. The current mainstays of treatment are radical prostatectomy (with selective use of adjuvant radiation) and radical radiotherapy with concurrent androgen deprivation. The outcomes from these two approaches seem to be remarkably similar and are considered equally valid options for primary treatment. The choice of therapy is critically dependent on a number of factors, but ultimately left to the decision of the patients with advice from clinicians. Clinicians themselves, however, are known to be biased towards their particular skill set and experiences. Attempts at randomised comparisons between these two modalities have so far failed and are confounded by patient-clinician bias, the continual advances in therapy as well as the long natural history of the disease. In the lack of level 1 comparable evidence, this article explores the existing literature as to the key factors that should be considered in radical treatment selection for high-risk prostate cancer. These factors include disease aggressiveness, comorbidity and life expectancy, functional outcomes and the consequences of therapy failure with regards to salvage treatment. We propose that these factors may be useful in developing a decision guide for rationale radical therapy selection in the light of two apparently equally effective treatments. Ultimately, however, there is an urgent need for added clinical and biological markers that can provide a more precise approach to therapy selection.

The Prognostic Value of Percentage of Positive Biopsy Cores, Percentage of Cancer Volume, and Maximum Involvement of Biopsy Cores in Prostate Cancer Patients Receiving Proton and Photon Beam Therapy

The purpose of the study is to compare the prognostic value of percentage of positive biopsy cores (PPBC), percentage of cancer volume (PCV), and maximum involvement of biopsy cores (MIBC) as a prognostic factor in low- and intermediate-risk patients with clinically localized prostate cancer who received proton or photon beam therapy. Four hundred and fifty-nine patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma who were treated with proton or photon beam therapy at Loma Linda University Medical Center were used for this analysis. Patients were treated with a median dose of 74.0 Gy (range 70.2–79.2) proton or combined proton/photon beam radiotherapy. Pathology reports were reviewed and PPBC, PCV, and MIBC were recorded. Analysis of biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) outcome was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Cox regression multivariate analyses were performed to assess the impact of the biopsy factors on survival. Results: 285, 291, and 291 patients had biopsy information available for analysis, respectively. Survival analysis showed that a higher PPBC, PCV, and MIBC were each individually associated with an increased risk of biochemical failure on univariate analysis ( p < 0.01). Only PPBC and PCV were associated with an increased risk of biochemical failure on multivariate analysis, adjusting for age, NCCN risk group, and dose ( p < 0.01). When isolating the intermediate-risk group, only PPBC and PCV were statistically significant on multivariate analysis. Multivariate analysis of the intermediate-risk group comparing PPBC and PCV showed that PPBC was not a significant predictor of biochemical failure, while PCV was a significant predictor of biochemical failure ( p = 0.37 and p = 0.03, respectively). Conclusion: PPBC and PCV can potentially be used for additional risk stratification of intermediate-risk patients with PCV potentially being the most clinically relevant predictor bNED survival. MIBC was not found to have utility in the prognosis of low- and intermediate-risk patients.

Factors that predict the development of bone metastases due to prostate cancer: Recommendations for follow-up and therapeutic options

CONTEXT

Prostate cancer is a public health problem in Spain and in the Western world. Bone involvement, associated to significant morbidity, is practically constant in the advanced stages of the disease. This work aims to review the prognostic factors used in the usual clinical practice that predict the development of bone metastases and to analyze the follow-up and treatment option in these patient profiles.

ACQUIRING OF EVIDENCE

We performed a review of the literature on the useful factors in the context of therapy with intention to cure. We included the classical clinical values in the diagnosis (PSA, clinical stage, Gleason score on the biopsy) pathological factors (pT stage, margins, bladder invasion, tumor volume, lymph node involvement) and PSA kinetics in their different contexts and the histological and molecular parameters.

SYNTHESIS OF EVIDENCE

The tumor differentiation "Gleason" score and PSA are the most important predictive factors in the prediction of bone metastases in patients with intention to cure. Kinetic factors such as PSA doubling time (TDPSA) < 8 months or PSA > 10 ng/ml in the case of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CPRC), are predictive factors for the development of metastasis. Zoledronic acid and denosumab have demonstrated their effectiveness for the treatment of bone disease in randomized studies.

CONCLUSIONS

There are predictive factors within the usual clinical practice that make it possible to recognize the "patient at risk" to develop bone metastatic disease. The currently available treatments, zoledronic acid or denosumab, can help us in the management of the patient at risk of developing metastasis or metastatic patient, increasing the quality of life and decreasing skeletal events.

Combined brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy without adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy for high-risk prostate cancer

Background

To report the outcomes of patients treated with combined iodine-125 (I-125) brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for high-risk prostate cancer.

Methods

Between 2003 and 2009, I-125 permanent prostate brachytherapy plus EBRT was performed for 206 patients with high-risk prostate cancer. High-risk patients had prostate-specific antigen ≥ 20 ng/mL, and/or Gleason score ≥ 8, and/or Stage ≥ T3. One hundred and one patients (49.0%) received neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) but none were given adjuvant ADT. Biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS) was determined using the Phoenix definition.

Results

The 5-year actuarial BFFS rate was 84.8%. The 5-year cause-specific survival and overall survival rates were 98.7% and 97.6%, respectively. There were 8 deaths (3.9%), of which 2 were due to prostate cancer. On multivariate analysis, positive biopsy core rates and the number of high-risk factors were independent predictors of BFFS. The 5-year BFFS rates for patients in the positive biopsy core rate <50% and ≥50% groups were 89.3% and 78.2%, respectively (p = 0.03). The 5-year BFFS rate for patients with the any single high-risk factor was 86.1%, compared with 73.6% for those with any 2 or all 3 high-risk factors (p = 0.03). Neoadjuvant ADT did not impact the 5-year BFFS.

Conclusions

At a median follow-up of 60 months, high-risk prostate cancer patients undergoing combined I-125 brachytherapy and EBRT without adjuvant ADT have a high probability of achieving 5-year BFFS.

Age and Racial Differences among PSA-Detected (AJCC Stage T1cN0M0) Prostate Cancer in the U.S.: A Population-Based Study of 70,345 Men

Purpose: Few studies have evaluated the risk profile of prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-detected T1cN0M0 prostate cancer, defined as tumors diagnosed by needle biopsy because of elevated PSA levels without other clinical signs of disease. However, some men with stage T1cN0M0 prostate cancer may have high-risk disease (HRD), thus experiencing inferior outcomes as predicted by a risk group stratification model.

Methods: We identified men diagnosed with stage T1cN0M0 prostate cancer from 2004 to 2008 reported to the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) program. Multivariate logistic regression was used to model the probability of intermediate-risk-disease (IRD) (PSA ≥ 10 ng/ml but <20 ng/ml and/or GS 7), and high-risk-disease (HDR) (PSA ≥ 20 ng/ml, and/or GS ≥ 8), relative to low-risk disease (LRD) (PSA < 10 ng/ml and GS ≤ 6), adjusting for age, race, marital status, median household income, and area of residence.

Results: A total of 70,345 men with PSA-detected T1cN0M0 prostate cancer were identified. Of these, 47.6, 35.9, and 16.5% presented with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease, respectively. At baseline (50 years of age), risk was higher for black men than for whites for HRD (OR 3.31, 95% CI 2.85–3.84). The ORs for age (per year) for HRD relative to LRD were 1.09 (95% CI 1.09–1.10) for white men, and as 1.06 (95% CI 1.05–1.07) for black men. Further, among a subgroup of men with low PSA (<10 ng/ml) T1cN0M0 prostate cancer, risk was also higher for black man than for white men at baseline (50 years of age) (OR 2.70, 95% CI 2.09–3.48). The ORs for age (per year) for HRD relative to LRD were 1.09 (95% CI 1.09–1.10) for white men, and as 1.06 (95% CI 1.05–1.07) for black men.

Conclusion: A substantial proportion of men with PSA-detected prostate cancer as reported to the SEER program had HRD. Black race and older age were associated with a greater likelihood of HRD.

[Comparative study of radical prostatectomy versus external beam radiotherapy (75.6 Gy) combined with hormone therapy for prostate cancer of intermediate D'Amico risk classification]

INTRODUCTION

Thirty-three percent of the localized cancers belongs initially to the group of intermediate risk of D'Amico. The standard treatments validated by the French Association of Urology are the radical prostatectomy and the external beam radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVES

We retrospectively compared the carcinologic results of the radical prostatectomy±adjuvant treatment (RP) and the external beam radiotherapy combining high dose (75.6 Gy) and short hormonotherapy (RH), in the treatment of intermediate risk prostate cancer. The series consisted of 143 patients treated between 2000 and 2006 in the department of Urology and Kidney transplantation of the Conception Hospital, Marseilles. The main assessment criteria was the survival without biological recurrence (SBR).

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 90 months [59-51]. The 5 years and 8 years SBR were 85% and 73% in the RH group, versus 74% and 65% with RP (P=0.196). There was a significant difference between the series: on the age of diagnosis (63.9 versus 73.3 years, P<0.001), the Charlson score of comorbidity (2 versus 3, P<0.001) and the number of intermediate criteria per patients (one intermediate criteria: RP 74% versus 57%, P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

According to our study, there was no superiority of the radical prostatectomy±adjuvant treatment or the external radiotherapy combining high dose and concomitant short hormonotherapy on the survival without biological recurrence at 5 and 8 years. Many studies confirm that a concomitant hormonotherapy increases the carcinologic control, even with a high rate external beam radiotherapy.

[Radiotherapy with androgen deprivation in high-risk prostate cancer: what outcomes on a Caribbean population?]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze in a Caribbean population at 90% of African descent, the results of radiotherapy with androgen deprivation (AD) in high-risk prostate cancer (PCa).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-nine consecutive patients with a high-risk PCa as defined by the D'AMICO classification and treated by radiotherapy with AD between January 2003 and April 2009 in our center were analyzed. The median dose of radiation and the median duration of AD were 70Gy and 37months respectively. Biochemical recurrence (BF), as primary outcome was defined according to the PHOENIX criteria (nadir PSA+2ng/mL). Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictive factors of BF. The median follow-up was 47months.

RESULTS

Eight (13.6%) patients had BF and four (6.8%) developed metastases. Six (10.2%) died during the follow-up. The 5years acturial biochemical disease-free survival was 79.7%. Multivariate analyses have shown that Gleason sum (GS) superior to 7 (P=0.029), AD duration less than 24months (P=0.004) and the rate of Nadir PSA greater or equal to 0.5ng/mL (P=0.011) were independent predictive factors of BF.

CONCLUSION

This study was the first to our knowledge, to provide that radiotherapy associate with AD for HRPC among Caribbean men is effective as observed in other populations. Patients with GS superior to 7 could be considered for more aggressive treatments in clinical trials.

The role of the maximum involvement of biopsy core in predicting outcome for patients treated with dose-escalated radiation therapy for prostate cancer

Purpose

To evaluate the influence of the maximum involvement of biopsy core (MIBC) on outcome for prostate cancer patients treated with dose-escalated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).

Methods and materials

The outcomes of 590 men with localized prostate cancer treated with EBRT (≥75 Gy) at a single institution were retrospectively analyzed. The influence of MIBC on freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF), freedom from metastasis (FFM), cause-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) was compared to other surrogates for biopsy tumor volume, including the percentage of positive biopsy cores (PPC) and the total percentage of cancer volume (PCV).

Results

MIBC correlated with PSA, T-stage, Gleason score, NCCN risk group, PPC, PCV, and treatment related factors. On univariate analysis, MIBC was prognostic for all endpoints except OS; with greatest impact in those with Gleason scores of 8–10. However, on multivariate analysis, MIBC was only prognostic for FFBF (hazard ratio [HR] 1.9, p = 0.008), but not for FFM (p = 0.19), CSS (p = 0.16), and OS (p = 0.99).

Conclusions

In patients undergoing dose-escalated EBRT, MIBC had the greatest influence in those with Gleason scores of 8–10 but provided no additional prognostic data as compared to PPC and PCV, which remain the preferable prognostic variables in this patient population.

Long-term outcome for very high-risk prostate cancer treated primarily with a triple modality approach to include permanent interstitial brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate outcome in the most unfavorable subset of high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with a combination of supplemental external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Very high-risk prostate cancer was defined as follows: any Gleason score 10, Gleason score 8-9 with >50% of the biopsy cores positive for malignancy, Gleason score 8-9 with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >20ng/mL, any clinical stage T3, or any PSA >40ng/mL. One hundred thirty-one patients were identified who met the aforementioned criteria. The median followup was 6.6 years. One hundred twenty (91.6%) patients received supplemental EBRT and 100 (76.4%) received androgen deprivation therapy (median duration, 19.5 months; range, 4-36 months). The median postimplant day 0 D(90) (i.e., the minimum percentage of the prescription dose that covers the planning target volume) was 121.9% of prescription dose. Multiple clinical treatment and dosimetric parameters were evaluated for impact on the evaluated survival parameters.

RESULTS

The median pretreatment PSA and Gleason score were 11.0ng/mL and 8. One hundred ten (84%) patients had a Gleason score ≥8. At 9 and 12 years, the cause-specific survival, biochemical progression-free survival, and overall survival were 91.0% and 86.5%, 87.3% and 87.3%, and 70.5% and 60.5%, respectively. The most common cause of death was heart disease (22.2%) with deaths from nonprostate cancer (12.7%) and prostate cancer (8.3%) being less likely.

CONCLUSIONS

Permanent interstitial brachytherapy usually with supplemental EBRT and androgen deprivation therapy results in excellent biochemical control and cause-specific survival in the most unfavorable subset of high-risk prostate cancer patients. Death from diseases of the heart was more than twice as likely as death from prostate cancer.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® definitive external beam irradiation in stage T1 and T2 prostate cancer

PURPOSE

: External beam radiation therapy is a standard of care treatment for men who present with clinically localized (T1-T2) prostate cancer. The purpose of this review was to provide clarification on the appropriateness criteria and management considerations for the treatment of prostate cancer with external beam radiation therapy.

METHODS

: A panel consisting of physicians with expertise on prostate cancer was assembled and provided with a number of clinical scenarios for consensus treatment and management guidelines. Prostate cancer patient vignettes were presented along with specific management recommendations based on an extensive review of the modern external beam radiotherapy literature. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances, where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

RESULTS

: Modern external beam radiation therapy series demonstrate favorable biochemical control rates for patients with localized prostate cancer. Morbidity profiles are also favorable and it is clear that this is enhanced by modern techniques like 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy. An active area of investigation is evaluating the use of hypofractionated dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

: Continued investigation to refine patient selection, external beam radiation technology application, and alternative dosing schedules should result in further improvements in biochemical outcome and decreased morbidity with external beam radiation treatment for localized prostate cancer.

Optimized Prostate Brachytherapy Minimizes the Prognostic Impact of Percent of Biopsy Cores Involved With Adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

A higher percent of positive biopsy cores predicts poor biochemical failure-free survival. The highest dose covering at least 90% of the prostate is a standard method of measuring implant quality. We tested the hypothesis that the percentage of positive biopsy cores loses its adverse prognostic impact in patients who receive implants with a highest dose covering at least 90% of the prostate of 100% or greater of the prescription dose.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 568 patients with intermediate to high risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate who were previously treated with brachytherapy in a prospective, randomized study were evaluated. The relationship between the percentage of positive biopsy cores, the highest dose covering at least 90% of the prostate and biochemical failure was examined.

RESULTS

At a median followup of 50 months the rate of 5-year biochemical failure-free survival was 87% for the entire group and 92% vs 81% for patients with less than 50% vs 50% or greater positive biopsy cores (log rank p = 0.009). The mean highest dose covering at least 90% of the prostate was statistically lower in failing vs nonfailing cases (p = 0.03). Gleason score, prostate specific antigen, 50% or greater positive biopsy cores and the highest dose covering at least 90% of the prostate were the only statistically significant predictive factors for biochemical failure-free survival on multivariate Cox regression analysis. When regression analysis was restricted to the 237 patients who received implants with a highest dose covering at least 90% of the prostate of 100% or greater, 50% or greater positive biopsy cores lost predictive value but prostate specific antigen and Gleason score remained independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

A total of 50% or greater positive biopsy cores is an independent predictor of poor biochemical failure-free survival in patients treated with brachytherapy. High quality prostate brachytherapy, defined by a highest dose covering at least 90% of the prostate of 100% or greater, minimize the adverse effect of 50% or greater positive biopsy cores on time to biochemical failure.

Lack of prognostic significance of prostate biopsies in metastatic androgen independent prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

To assess the significance of viable tumour in the prostate of patients with metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We evaluated the clinicopathological features, including follow-up, of 40 men with metastatic AIPC who had a transrectal biopsy of the prostate.

RESULTS

Prostate biopsies (median three cores per biopsy) showed viable tumour in 19 of 40 patients (48%). Of the 18 patients who had received radiotherapy (RT), nine had negative on-study biopsy results. A previous history of RT was not associated with overall survival in patients with biopsy-positive tumours (P = 0.84). Also, there was no statistically significant association between positive or negative biopsy status and overall survival (OS) in these 40 patients (P = 0.39), with a similar median OS of 19.6 months for biopsy-negative and 19.8 months for biopsy-positive patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Taking prostate biopsies at the time of documented metastatic AIPC yielded tumour in about half the patients. A previous history of RT was not associated with a negative prostate biopsy; the latter appears to have no influence on the prognosis.

Percent positive biopsy cores as a prognostic factor for prostate cancer treated with external beam radiation

OBJECTIVES

To examine the prognostic value of percent positive cores (PPC) in prostate cancer patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS

An institutional review board-approved, retrospective analysis was conducted on 814 patients treated with RT with or without hormonal therapy between 1984 and 2002. Percent positive cores (number of positive cores divided by total number of cores) was calculable for 591 patients with a median follow-up of 65 months. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard methods relating PPC to other risk factors, biochemical/clinical disease-free survival (PSA-DFS), prostate cancer-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Percent positive cores was associated with stage, Gleason score (GS), pretreatment serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, and use of adjunctive androgen suppression therapy. The 5-year PSA-DFS, DSS, and OS rates were 80%, 99%, and 91%, respectively, for patients with PPC less than 50%, compared with 56%, 94%, and 87% for patients with PPC 50% or greater (P <0.0001, <0.004, and <0.04, respectively). Multivariable analysis revealed that PPC, stage, GS, PSA, and androgen suppression therapy were all significantly associated with PSA-DFS, whereas only GS was associated with DSS and OS. For high, intermediate, and low-risk patients, 5-year PSA-DFS was 62% versus 39%, 80% versus 59%, and 90% versus 82% for PPC less than 50% versus PPC 50% or greater, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Percent positive cores predicts outcome of prostate cancer patients treated with RT, independently of other known prognostic factors. Percent positive cores may have particular use for further risk stratification within established clinical risk categories.

A Simple Model Predicts Freedom From Biochemical Recurrence After Low-Dose Rate Prostate Brachytherapy Alone

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to describe a simple model that predicts freedom from biochemical recurrence (FFBR) in men with prostate cancer after treatment with low-dose rate prostate brachytherapy (LDRPB) alone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred thirty-two men were treated with LDRPB alone between September 1997 and April 2001. Sixty-four percent of men had low-risk disease (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] <10, Gleason <7, and T stage <T2b) and 36% had intermediate-risk disease (PSA > or =10, Gleason > or =7, or T stage T2b). The dosimetric quantifier D90 was calculated from a computed tomography scan performed 1 month after LDRPB. The percent positive biopsies (PPB) were determined for all patients. FFBR was estimated using the product limit method. All P values are 2-sided.

RESULTS

The median follow-up is 65 months. The median D90 is 138 Gy (range, 47-221 Gy). Fourteen men have developed evidence of biochemical relapse at a median of 27 months (range, 6-42 months). The 5-year FFBR rate for the entire cohort is 88%. On univariate analysis, variables found to be associated with FFBR included: PSA, Gleason score, T stage, risk group, PPB, and D90. Multivariate analysis indicated that D90, PPB, and risk group were independently associated with FFBR. Patients were categorized based on the following 3 adverse prognostic factors: D90 <140 Gy, PPB > or =50%, and intermediate-risk group. Group 1 (0 factors, n = 30), group 2 (1 factor, n = 72), and group 3 (> or =2 factors, n = 30) patients had 5-year FFBR rates of 100% (+/-0%), 92% (+/-6%), and 67% (+/-18%) (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed a simple, robust model based on implant quality and disease factors that predicts FFBR in men with prostate cancer treated with LDRPB alone.

Radical prostatectomy for high-grade prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

Patients with high-grade clinically localized disease often have disease beyond the prostate and, if so, are unlikely to benefit from radical prostatectomy in the long-term. The objective of this study was to assess whether use of other known prognostic factors could be helpful in defining which men with Gleason 8 to 10 prostate cancer are most likely to benefit from surgical management.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on men with biopsy Gleason 8 to 10 prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy at two major university centers. No patients received hormonal therapy as part of initial treatment or adjuvant radiation therapy. Surgery was performed using a retropubic approach, and lymph node dissection was performed in all patients. Risk groups were defined based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value and percent positive biopsy cores (%PBC). A Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to assess for differences in pretreatment prognostic factors. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated for each group, and then comparisons between groups were performed using log-rank analysis to assess for differences in 5-year actuarial freedom from biochemical failure.

RESULTS

Radical prostatectomy was performed on 196 patients between 1987 and 2002, of whom 168 had sufficient data for analysis. Median follow-up was 18 months (range, 1 to 130 months), with 31 patients at risk for more than 5 years. Patients with a PSA value of less than 10 ng/mL and %PBC of less than 50% had a 5-year actuarial biochemical control rate of 67% versus 23% for all other patients (P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

PSA value and %PBC are useful in selecting patients with high-grade prostate cancer most likely to benefit by radical prostatectomy.

Percentage of positive biopsies associated with freedom from biochemical recurrence after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy alone for clinically localized prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To examine the relationship between the percentage of positive biopsies (PPBs) and freedom from biochemical recurrence (FFBR) in men treated with low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDRPB) alone. The PPBs has been associated with FFBR in men treated with radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

METHODS

This report concerns 108 men treated with LDRPB alone between November 1997 and December 1999. All patients had clinically localized prostate cancer confirmed by biopsy. All men were treated with iodine-125 to 144 Gy. FFBR was estimated using the product-limit method. Putative covariates for FFBR, including T stage, Gleason score, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level, minimal dose received by 90% of the target volume, and PPBs, were examined using the proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 61 months. Of the 108 men, 13 developed evidence of biochemical relapse at a median of 25 months. The 5-year estimate of FFBR was 87% (95% confidence interval 81% to 93%) for the entire cohort. On univariate analysis, prostate-specific antigen, T stage, minimal dose received by 90% of the target volume, and PPBs were associated with FFBR. In the multivariate model, the PPBs was the only variable that predicted for FFBR (P = 0.002). The 5-year estimate of FFBR was 95% for patients with less than 50% PPB disease versus 63% in patients with more than 50% PPB disease (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The PPBs is an important independent predictor of FFBR after LDRPB alone. The FFBR after LDRPB in the group of patients with more than 50% PPBs was poor.

Prediction by quantitative histology of pathological stage in prostate cancer

AIMS

To find a predictor of extraprostatic extension in clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa), pre-operative ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsies and clinico-pathological data were reviewed.

METHODS

One hundred and eighty-three consecutive patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinical T1-T2 PCa and serum PSA <10 ng/ml were reviewed. Pre-operative biopsy was performed according to an extended protocol and whole-mount prostatectomy specimens were processed. The following biopsy variables were categorized to this analysis: Gleason score (< or =6, >6), TPC (< or =20%; >20%), GPC (< or =50%; >50%), cancer-positive cores (< or =2; >2), cancer-positive cores in both lateral portions (yes; no), PCa (monolateral; bilateral).

RESULTS

Only 60/183 specimens showed an organ-confined PCa; the remaining ones showed pT3a in 57 cases, pT3b in 11 and pT3 with positive surgical margins in 55. A locally advanced PCa was found in 60.2 and 76.8% of T1c and T2 clinical stage, respectively. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value of biopsy findings to predict a locally advanced PCa was 89.9 and 75%, respectively. All biopsy variables associations were statistically significant; however, among these variables (non-categorized), in multivariate logistic regression analysis, only GPC was significantly associated with pathologic stage (odds ratio estimate was 1.075, 95% CI: 1.053-1.098).

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative histology, especially GPC, seems to be helpful for pre-operative staging of PCa in patients with T1c-T2 clinical stage and PSA < 10 ng/ml.

Optimal treatment of intermediate-risk prostate carcinoma with radiotherapy

The clinical heterogeneity of intermediate-risk prostate carcinoma presents a challenge to urologic oncology in terms of prognosis and management. There is controversy regarding whether patients with intermediate-risk prostate carcinoma should be treated with dose-escalated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) (e.g., doses > 74 gray [Gy]), or conventional-dose EBRT (e.g., doses < 74 Gy) combined with androgen deprivation (AD). Data for this review were identified through searches for articles in MEDLINE and in conference proceedings, indexed from 1966 to 2004. Currently, the intermediate-risk prostate carcinoma grouping is defined on the basis of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), tumor classification (T classification), and Gleason score. Emerging evidence suggests that additional prognostic information may be derived from the percentage of positive core needle biopsies at the time of diagnosis and/or from the pretreatment PSA doubling time. Novel prognostic biomarkers include protein expression relating to cell cycle control, cell death, DNA repair, and intracellular signal transduction. Preclinical data support dose escalation or combined AD with radiation as a means to increase prostate carcinoma cell kill. There is Level I evidence that patients with intermediate-risk prostate carcinoma benefit from dose-escalated EBRT or AD plus conventional-dose EBRT. However, clinical evidence is lacking to support the uniform use of AD plus dose-escalated EBRT. Patients in the intermediate-risk group should be entered into well designed, randomized clinical trials of dose-escalated EBRT and AD with sufficient power to address biochemical failure and cause-specific survival endpoints. These studies should be stratified by novel prognostic markers and accompanied by strong translational endpoints to address clinical heterogeneity and to allow for individualized treatment.

Association of percent positive prostate biopsies and perineural invasion with biochemical outcome after external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Few studies have evaluated the significance of the percentage of positive biopsies (PPB) and perineural invasion (PNI) for patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for localized prostate cancer. Our goal was to investigate the value of these factors in predicting biochemical control (bNED) after EBRT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The study cohort consisted of 331 patients who received EBRT between 1993 and 1999 for clinically localized prostate cancer. The median follow-up was 4.4 years (range, 3 months to 9.6 years). The distribution by clinical T stage was as follows: T1 in 55 (17%), T2a in 94 (28%), T2b in 76 (23%), T2c in 74 (22%), T3a in 27 (8%), and T3b in 5 (2%). The pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (iPSA) level was < or =10 ng/mL in 224 patients, 10.1-20 ng/mL in 72 patients, and >20 ng/mL in 35 patients. The biopsy Gleason score was < or =6 in 216 patients and > or =7 in 115 patients. On the basis of the pathology report, the PPB was calculated for 239 patients and was < or =33% in 109, 34-66% in 72, and > or =67% in 58 patients. PNI was present in 30 patients. The median dose of EBRT was 68.4 Gy (range, 64-71 Gy). Patients were categorized into three risk groups: 142 patients were low risk (T1-T2, iPSA < or =10 ng/mL, and Gleason score < or =6), 137 were intermediate risk (increase in the value of one of the risk factors); and 52 patients were high risk (increase in value of two or more of the risk factors). Biochemical failure was defined as three consecutive rises in the PSA level.

RESULTS

The 5-year bNED rate for the entire cohort was 62%. The 5-year bNED rate for the low-, intermediate, and high-risk group was 79%, 51%, and 47%, respectively (p <0.0001). On univariate analysis (log-rank test), clinical stage (p = 0.0073), grade (p <0.0001), iPSA (p = 0.0043), risk group (p <0.0001), PPB (p = 0.0193), and presence of PNI (p = 0.0137) correlated with bNED. For T1-T2a, T2b-T2c, and T3 patients, the 5-year bNED rate was 71%, 59%, and 40%, respectively. The 5-year bNED rate was 68% for those with an iPSA level of < or =10 ng/mL and 49% for those with an iPSA level of >10 ng/mL. For patients with PPB < or =33%, 34-66%, and > or =67%, the 5-year bNED rate was 75%, 67%, and 51%, respectively. Within the intermediate-risk group, the PPB was significantly associated with the bNED rate: 67%, 52%, and 30% for those with PPB < or =33%, 34-66%, and > or =67%, respectively (p = 0.0046). This association was not seen in the low- or high-risk group. The 5-year bNED rate was 64% for patients without PNI and 48% for those with PNI. On multivariate analysis (Cox proportional hazards model), the statistically significant predictive factors for bNED were risk group (p = 0.0032) and PPB (p = 0.044). Using the chi-square test, statistically significant associations between T stage, PSA level, Gleason score, and risk group with PPB were found; PNI was significantly associated with T stage and PSA level only.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that PPB and PNI have a statistically significant impact on the bNED rate in patients treated with conventional dose of EBRT (< or =71 Gy). Within the intermediate-risk group, the PPB was predictive of bNED, suggesting that patients with < or =33% PPB had a statistically significant better treatment outcome compared with those with a greater PPB. PNI was not significant for bNED in multivariate analysis. The effects of these two prognostic factors in patients who have been treated with higher doses of RT (> or =75.6 Gy) should be studied.

Impact of the Percentage of Positive Prostate Cores on Prostate Cancer–Specific Mortality for Patients With Low or Favorable Intermediate-Risk Disease

Purpose

We investigated whether pretreatment factors predicted time to prostate cancer–specific mortality (PCSM) after conventional-dose and conformal radiation therapy (CRT).

Patients and Methods

Between 1988 and 2002, 421 patients with low (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level ≤ 10 ng/mL and biopsy Gleason score ≤ 6) or favorable intermediate-risk (PSA > 10 to 15 ng/mL or biopsy Gleason score 3 + 4, but not both factors) disease underwent CRT (median dose, 70.4 Gy). Cox regression multivariable analysis was performed to determine whether the PSA level, Gleason score, T category, or the percentage of positive cores (% PC) predicted time to PCSM after CRT. After a median follow-up of 4.5 years, 117 (28%) patients have died.

Results

The % PC was the only significant predictor (Cox P ≤ .03). The relative risk of PCSM after CRT for patients with ≥ 50% as compared with less than 50% PC was 10.4 (95% CI, 1.2 to 87; Cox P = .03), 6.1 (95% CI, 1.3 to 28.6; Cox P = .02), and 12.5 (95% CI, 1.5 to 107; Cox P = .02) in men with a PSA ≤ 10 and Gleason score ≤ 6, PSA ≤ 10 and Gleason score ≤ 7, and PSA ≤ 15 and Gleason score ≤ 6, respectively. By 5 years after CRT, 5% to 9% compared with less than 1% (log-rank P ≤ .01) of these patients experienced PCSM if they had ≥ 50% compared with less than 50% PC, respectively.

Conclusion

CRT dose-escalation techniques, the addition of hormonal therapy, or both should be considered in the management of patients with low or favorable intermediate-risk disease and ≥ 50% PC.

Prognostic significance of percent positive biopsies in clinically organ-confined prostate cancer treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy with or without supplemental external-beam radiation

PURPOSE

The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the relationship between the percentage of positive biopsies and the biochemical outcome in hormone-naive patients undergoing permanent prostate brachytherapy with or without supplemental external-beam radiation therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four hundred thirteen hormone-naive patients underwent prostate brachytherapy for clinical T1c-T2b NxM0 (1997 American Joint Committee on Cancer classification) adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland from April 1995 through June 2001. The median patient age was 66.9 years, and the median pretreatment prostate-specific antigen value was 6.8 ng/mL. The median follow-up was 52 months. Patients were stratified by percentage of positive biopsy results into the following cohorts: < 34%, 34%-50%, and > 50%. The influences of percentage of positive biopsy results, patient age, clinical T stage, Gleason score, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen value, risk group, prostate volume, supplemental external-beam radiation therapy, isotope, percentage of prescribed dose covering 90% of the target volume (D90), and volume receiving 100%, 150%, and 200% of the prescribed dose (V100/150/200) were evaluated. Biochemical disease-free survival was defined by the American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition.

RESULTS

For all 413 patients, the 7-year actuarial freedom from biochemical progression rate was 99.4%, 94.3%, and 89.2% when stratified by percentage of positive biopsy results in the < 34%, 34%-50%, and > 50% groups, respectively. When low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients were stratified by percentage of positive biopsy results, a nonsignificant trend for increased biochemical progression was noted with increasing positive biopsy results. In multivariate analysis, percentage of positive biopsy results and pretreatment prostate-specific antigen value were the only significant predictors of biochemical outcome. The median postimplantation prostate-specific antigen value for all biochemically disease-free patients was < 0.1 ng/mL, regardless of risk group or percentage of positive biopsy results cohort.

DISCUSSION

Multivariate analysis demonstrated that percentage of positive biopsy results and pretreatment prostate-specific antigen value were statistically significant predictors of 7-year biochemical progression-free survival. However, the relatively small absolute differences in biochemical outcome based on percentage of positive biopsy results may be a result of radiation dose escalation with the utilization of generous periprostatic treatment margins.

The use of hormonal therapy with radiotherapy for prostate cancer: analysis of prospective randomised trials

In 1901, Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen won the Nobel prize in Physics for his discovery of the Röntgen rays or, as he himself called them, X-rays. In 1966, Dr Charles Brenton Higgins won the Nobel Prize in Medicine for his breakthroughs concerning hormonal treatment of prostatic cancer. After 31 years, in 1997, the first prospective randomised trials of the combination of hormonal therapy and radiation therapy were published, showing increased survival when compared to radiation therapy alone for patients with prostate cancer. Since 1997, many investigators have published trials combining hormonal and radiation therapy for prostate cancer. This minireview will address the largest and most influential of these trials, and attempt to guide physicians in selecting the appropriate patients for this combined approach.