Biology-based combined-modality radiotherapy: workshop report

New NSAID-Pt(IV) prodrugs to suppress metastasis and invasion of tumor cells and enhance anti-tumor effect in vitro and in vivo

The great interest in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) programme lies in its association with process of metastasis and invasion, which is a crucial cause of cancer-related death. Herein, we designed and reported three new NSAID-Pt(IV) prodrugs, taking Non-Steroid Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) to disrupt EMT programme and assist genotoxic platinum-based drugs as a cytotoxicity booster, to offer a class of potential anticarcinogens with a multi-functional action mechanism. The NSAID-Pt(IV) prodrugs, especially Eto-Pt(IV), highly enhanced cellular uptake with amount up to 42-fold at 3 h compared with CDDP, and greatly increased DNA damage and cell apoptosis, showing much higher cytotoxicity than cisplatin in the tested cancer cells even in A549/cis cells. Among of them, Eto-Pt(IV) and Car-Pt(IV) exhibited more excellent activity than Sul-Pt(IV), arising from their reduction-labile and favorable lipophilicity. Most strikingly, Eto-Pt(IV) markedly inhibited metastasis and invasion of MCF-7 cells, owing to its COX-2 suppression that down-regulated active MMP-2, vimentin protein and up-regulated E-cadherin. In vivo, Eto-Pt(IV) displayed potent antitumor activity and no observable toxicity in BALB/c nude mice bearing MCF-7 tumors.

Radiation therapy as a backbone of treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is a heterogeneous disease, encompassing stage IIIA, for which surgery in combination with chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy (RT) represents a potential treatment approach for select patients, and stage IIIB, for which chemoradiation represents the standard of care. Recent advances in systemic cytotoxic and molecularly targeted therapies coupled with technologic innovations in radiotherapy have the potential to improve outcomes for this patient population. Many ongoing clinical trials use specific genetic mutations or histologic status to determine the combination of targeted therapies and RT, as well as to determine the optimal chemoradiotherapy platforms. Additionally, use of modern RT techniques has improved outcomes for some patients with limited metastatic disease, thereby prompting further studies on how to best integrate aggressive management of oligometastases using RT with chemotherapeutic regimens.

Nimotuzumab combined with radiotherapy for esophageal cancer: preliminary study of a Phase II clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine the safety and therapeutic effects of nimotuzumab (h-R3) combined with radiotherapy in esophageal cancer.

METHODS

This Phase II clinical trial involved 42 patients with stage II (inoperable or refused surgery) to stage IV (supraclavicular lymph node metastasis only) esophageal cancers treated between November 2008 and July 2010. All patients had squamous cell carcinomas, and all received three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and 200 mg nimotuzumab per week during radiotherapy.

RESULTS

There were 9, 25, and 8 patients with stage II, III and IV disease, respectively. All except two patients received 50-70 Gy radiation; 37 patients (88.1%) received more than five nimotuzumab doses. Grade III toxicities (21.4% of all adverse events) included esophagitis and gastrointestinal, dermatological and hematological toxicities. Complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were observed in 0, 22 (52.4%), 17 (40.5%) and 3 (7.1%) patients at 1 month after the treatment. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) overexpression rate was 95.2%. After a median follow-up of 37 months, the median survival time (MST) was 14 months. The 2 year and 3 year overall survival (OS) rates were 33.3% and 26.2%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 10 months. The 2 year and 3 year PFS rates were 24.5% and 22.1%, respectively. The MST in the 13 patients with (+++) EGFR expression (group A) and 7 patients with (++) EGFR expression (group B) was 15 and 11 months, respectively. The 2 year and 3 year OS rates were 46.2% and 38.5% in group A and 28.6% and 28.6% in group B, respectively (P = 0.405).

CONCLUSION

Although concurrent chemoradiotherapy was the standard care for locally advanced esophageal cancer, radiotherapy was the choice for those who were refused or could not tolerate chemoradiotherapy. Our study shows that nimotuzumab combined with radiotherapy was well tolerated in patients with esophageal cancer. EGFR overexpression was more common than previously reported. OS was higher after combined therapy than after historical control radiotherapy alone. Further studies are required to confirm the therapeutic efficacy of nimotuzumab in esophageal cancer.

Synergistic effect of combination topotecan and chronomodulated radiation therapy on xenografted human nasopharyngeal carcinoma

PURPOSE

To investigate the in vivo chronomodulated radiosensitizing effect of topotecan (TPT) on human nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and its possible mechanisms.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Xenografted BALB/c (nu/nu) NPC mice were synchronized with an alternation of 12 hours of light from 0 to 12 hours after light onset (HALO) and 12 hours of darkness to establish a unified biological rhythm. Chronomodulated radiosensitization of TPT was investigated by analysis of tumor regrowth delay (TGD), pimonidazole hydrochloride, histone H2AX phosphorylation, (γ-H2AX) topoisomerase I (Top I), cell cycle, and apoptosis after treatment with (1) TPT (10 mg/kg) alone; (2) radiation therapy alone (RT); and (3) TPT+RT at 3, 9, 15, and 21 HALO. The tumor-loaded mice without any treatment were used as controls.

RESULTS

The TPT+RT combination was more effective than TPT or RT as single agents. The TPT+RT combination at 15 HALO was best (TGD = 58.0 ± 3.6 days), and TPT+RT at 3 HALO was worst (TGD = 35.0 ± 1.5 days) among the 4 TPT+RT groups (P<.05). Immunohistochemistry analysis revealed a significantly increased histone H2AX phosphorylation expression and decreased pimonidazole hydrochloride expression in the TPT+RT group at the same time point. The results suggested that the level of tumor hypoxia and DNA damage varied in a time-dependent manner. The expression of Top I in the TPT+RT group was also significantly different from the control tumors at 15 HALO (P<.05). Cell apoptosis index was increased and the proportion of cells in S phase was decreased (P<.05) with the highest value in 15 HALO and the lowest in 3 HALO.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggested that TPT combined with chronoradiotherapy could enhance the radiosensitivity of xenografted NPC. The TPT+RT group at 15 HALO had the best therapeutic effect. The chronomodulated radiosensitization mechanisms of TPT might be related to circadian rhythm of tumor hypoxia, cell cycle redistribution, DNA damage, and expression of Top I.

Personalized Combined Modality Therapy for Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a heterogeneous disease, and we have embarked on an era where patients will benefit from individualized therapeutic strategies based on identifiable molecular characteristics of the tumor. The landmark studies demonstrating the importance of molecular characterization of tumors for NSCLC patients, the promising molecular pathways, and the potential molecular targets/agents for treatment of this disease will be reviewed. Understanding these issues will aid in the development of rationally designed clinical trials, so as to determine best means of appropriately incorporating these molecular strategies, to the current standard of radiation and chemotherapy regimens, for the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC.

C225 antiepidermal growth factor receptor antibody enhances the efficacy of docetaxel chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE

C225 anti-EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) antibody has been shown to enhance tumor response to radiation and a number of chemotherapeutic agents. Because of increased use of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in cancer treatment, it is important to determine whether C225 enhances also the antitumor efficacy of radiation when combined with chemotherapy. This study assessed the effect of C225 on tumor response when combined with docetaxel plus single or fractionated radiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

MDA468 human adenocarcinoma and A431 human epidermoid carcinoma cells growing as xenografts in the right hind leg of nude mice were used. Mice bearing 8-mm tumors were treated with C225 antibody at a dose of 1 mg given i.p. once, twice, or three times 3 days apart, 10 or 30 mg/kg docetaxel given i.v., and/or local tumor irradiation of 8 or 10 Gy single dose or fractionated irradiation consisting of 2 Gy daily for 5 days. When all three agents were combined, C225 was given 6 h before or 18 h after docetaxel, and radiation was given 24 h after docetaxel. The treatment end point was tumor growth delay.

RESULTS

C225 enhanced the antitumor efficacy of docetaxel, local tumor irradiation, and docetaxel combined with radiation. The response of both MDA468 and A431 carcinomas was enhanced. The enhancement factors ranged from 1.19 to 8.52, the degree of the enhancement depending on experimental conditions such as administration of multiple vs. single dose C225 or single or fractionated irradiation. C225 given twice or 3 times was more effective than when administered as a single dose. The effect of C225 was more pronounced when combined with single than fractionated irradiation with or without docetaxel. The triple-agent therapy was more effective than a single agent or double combination therapies, expressed by both increased tumor growth delay and the rate of tumor cure.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that C225 anti-EGFR antibody is a potent enhancer of tumor response to docetaxel or radiation as single agents, and to docetaxel when combined with radiation. Thus, these findings provide strong preclinical evidence in support of combination of anti-EGFR blockade with chemoradiotherapy.

Improvement strategies for molecular targeting: cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors as radiosensitizers for non-small cell lung cancer

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is an enzyme involved in prostaglandin production in pathologic states such as inflammatory processes and cancer. The enzyme is often overexpressed in premalignant lesions and various cancers, including cancer of the lung. Inhibition of this enzyme with selective COX-2 inhibitors was found to enhance tumor response to radiation in preclinical studies, suggesting that these agents can improve the response of various cancers to radiotherapy. On the basis of these preclinical findings, we initiated clinical trials of the combination of celecoxib, a selective COX-2 inhibitor, with radiotherapy in patients with lung cancer. Here we discuss the rationale for using selective COX-2 inhibitors and describe current clinical protocols and the initial findings.

Targeted therapies for stage III non-small cell lung cancer: integration in the combined modality setting

Combined modality therapy represents current standard therapy for locoregionally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. In particular, concomitant chemoradiotherapy has emerged as the preferred approach. At the same time, efforts to increase locoregional and systemic antitumor activity are necessary to further improve long-term survival rates for these patients. In recent years, multiple cellular targets have emerged in the development of novel antitumor therapies. Several of these are of high relevance in the carcinogenesis of lung cancer including the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), the ras signaling pathway, tumor angiogenesis, and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression. Novel agents directed against these targets are currently under development with promising early results in non-small cell lung cancer when administered as single agents or in combination with chemotherapy in stage IV or recurrent disease. Similarly their use with concurrent radiation therapy is supported by preclinical models. Selected early clinical trials utilizing these agents in combination with radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy are discussed.

Initial experience combining cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition with chemoradiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is a lethal disease that is resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Gemcitabine has recently been shown to be an improvement over 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced disease. It is also a potent radiosensitizer, which has led to the investigation of gemcitabine with concurrent radiotherapy. However, preliminary results indicate that there are significant limitations to this approach in this challenging disease. Pancreatic cancer cells have alterations in many molecular signaling pathways that may be responsible for their resistance to cytotoxic therapy and aggressive behavior. Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is commonly overexpressed in pancreatic tumors, and preclinical evidence indicates that selective COX-2 inhibition enhances both chemotherapy and radiotherapy response, without affecting normal tissue damage. We have initiated preclinical studies as well as a phase I clinical protocol evaluating the combination of gemcitabine and celecoxib (Celebrex) with radiotherapy. In preclinical studies, celecelecoxib strongly enhanced the antitumor efficacy of chemoradiation. However, preliminary observations from both the preclinical experiments as well as the clinical protocol have revealed more toxicity with this combination than with gemcitabine and radiotherapy alone. These observations require further study, but are cause for concern when combining gemcitabine, radiotherapy, and celecoxib.

COX-2 inhibitors as radiation sensitizers for upper GI tract cancers: esophagus, stomach, and pancreas

Cancers of the esophagus, stomach, and pancreas have been successfully treated recently with combinations of radiosensitizing chemotherapy and irradiation. New approaches building onto 5-fluorouracil chemoradiation include capecitabine (Xeloda) and irradiation. Capecitabine is an oral 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrug that is more convenient than using infusional 5-FU, appears to have a similar therapeutic profile, and can be combined with daily irradiation. The addition of a cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor is being investigated in upper gastrointestinal cancer sites because there is a high degree of overexpression of COX-2 in these cancers.

Poly(L-glutamic acid)-paclitaxel conjugate is a potent enhancer of tumor radiocurability

PURPOSE

Conjugating drugs with polymeric carriers is one way to improve selective delivery to tumors. Poly (L-glutamic acid)-paclitaxel (PG-TXL) is one such conjugate. Compared with paclitaxel, its uptake, tumor retention, and antitumor efficacy are increased. Initial studies showed that PG-TXL given 24 h before or after radiotherapy enhanced tumor growth delay significantly more than paclitaxel. To determine if PG-TXL-induced enhancement is obtained in a more clinically relevant setting, we investigated PG-TXL effects on tumor cure.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Mice bearing 7-mm-diameter ovarian carcinomas were treated with PG-TXL at an equivalent paclitaxel dose of 80 mg/kg, single dose or 5 daily fractions of radiation or both PG-TXL and radiation. Treatment endpoint was TCD(50) (radiation dose yielding tumor control in 50% of mice). Acute radioresponse of jejunum, skin, and hair was determined for all treatments.

RESULTS

PG-TXL dramatically improved tumor radioresponse, reducing TCD(50) of single-dose irradiation from 53.9 (52.2-55.5) Gy to 7.5 (4.5-10.7) Gy, an enhancement factor (EF) of 7.2. The drug improved the efficacy of fractionated irradiation even more, reducing the TCD(50) of 66.6 (62.8-90.4) Gy total fractionated dose to only 7.9 (4.3-11.5) Gy, for an EF of 8.4. PG-TXL did not affect normal tissue radioresponse resulting from either single or fractionated irradiation.

CONCLUSION

PG-TXL dramatically potentiated tumor radiocurability after single-dose or fractionated irradiation without affecting acute normal tissue injury. To our knowledge, PG-TXL increased the therapeutic ratio of radiotherapy more than that previously reported for other taxanes, thus, PG-TXL has a high potential to improve clinical radiotherapy.

Chemoradiotherapy: emerging treatment improvement strategies

BACKGROUND

The use of chemotherapeutic drugs in combination with radiotherapy has become a common strategy for the treatment of advanced cancer. Solid evidence exists showing that chemotherapy administered during the course of radiotherapy (concurrent chemoradiotherapy) increases both local tumor control and patient survival in a number of cancer sites, including head and neck cancer. These therapy improvements, however, have been achieved at the expense of considerable toxicity, which underscores the need for further improvements.

METHODS

The current status of chemoradiotherapy clinical trials for head and neck cancer and research on the emerging treatment improvements were reviewed. A review of potential treatment improvement strategies focused on preclinical investigations on newer chemotherapeutic agents, notably taxanes and nucleoside analogues, as well as on molecular targets such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) enzyme.

RESULTS

Concurrent, but not induction (drugs given before radiotherapy), chemoradiotherapy improves locoregional tumor control and survival benefit in head and neck carcinoma relative to radiotherapy alone. In comparison, both concurrent and induction chemoradiotherapy showed therapeutic advantage over radiotherapy alone in the treatment of lung cancer. These therapeutic improvements were achieved with standard chemotherapeutic drugs, most commonly cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Biologically, chemotherapy interacts with radiation through a number of mechanisms, including inhibition of cellular repair, cell cycle effects, and inhibition of tumor cell regeneration. Potential avenues emerged to further improve chemoradiotherapy. One of these involves the newer chemotherapeutic agents, taxanes and nucleoside analogues, which in preclinical studies exhibited strong tumor radiosensitization and therapeutic gain. The clinical benefit of these agents is currently under testing. Another approach for improvement of chemoradiotherapy consists of inhibiting molecules selectively or preferentially expressed on tumor cells, such as EGFR and COX-2, both shown to render cellular resistance to drugs or radiation. Agents that selectively inhibit these molecules are becoming available at a rapid rate, and many of them have been shown in preclinical testing to be highly effective in improving tumor radioresponse or chemoresponse without affecting normal tissues.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy, using standard chemotherapeutic agents, has emerged as an effective treatment for advanced cancer, but unfortunately at the expense of considerable increase in normal tissue toxicity. There are a number of potential emerging treatment strategies to further improve chemoradiotherapy. One consists of using newer chemotherapeutic drugs, which in preclinical studies are potent enhancers of tumor radioresponse. Another approach consists of targeting EGFR or COX-2 with selective inhibitors of these molecules.

Docetaxel/Radiation Combinations: Rationale and Preclinical Findings

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy, administration of chemotherapeutic agents during the course of radiation therapy, has increasingly been used for treatment of advanced locoregional cancer. Improvements in radiation therapy are achieved through independent cytotoxic action of drugs and their ability to sensitize tumor cells to radiation. Laboratory investigations showed that docetaxel is potent in both of these actions. The drug increased the radiosensitivity of in vitro cultured cells and the in vivo tumor radioresponse. In contrast to exerting a strong enhancement of tumor radioresponse, the ability of docetaxel to modify normal tissue radiation damage was much lower. Thus, docetaxel can significantly increase therapeutic gain when combined with radiation therapy. The initial rationale for using docetaxel and other taxanes as radiation enhancers was the ability of these agents to arrest cells in the radiosensitive G2/M phases of the cell cycle. Additional mechanisms were subsequently detected, including the ability of docetaxel to eliminate radioresistant S-phase cells, cause tumor reoxygenation, stimulate antitumor immune resistance mechanisms, and possibly inhibit tumor angiogenesis. Because combined chemoradiotherapy treatments are limited by normal tissue toxicity, additional treatment strategies are needed to improve the antitumor efficacy and to minimize normal tissue toxicity. In this regard, many research avenues are being explored, particularly the possibility of combining chemoradiotherapy with molecular targeting. This overview addresses the rationale for major findings on the interaction of docetaxel and radiation in preclinical models and discusses how these findings may impact practical use of chemoradiotherapy.

The impact of TNF-alpha induction on therapeutic efficacy following high dose spatially fractionated (GRID) radiation

A variety of cytokines especially TNF-alpha and TGF-beta are known to be released in response to high dose radiation of tumors. However, these are not normally measurable in systemic circulation unless high levels of these cytokines are produced by tumor cells. This study was undertaken to see if circulating levels of these cytokines could be measured in the serum of patients treated with high dose spatially fractionated (GRID) radiation and to correlate the finding of these cytokines with clinical response to treatment. Thirty-four patients (31 patients had single treatment site and 3 patients had 2 treatment sites) treated with spatially fractionated (GRID) radiation were entered in this study. Serum samples were collected before treatment and at 24, 48 and 72 hours after GRID radiation. Sandwich enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed to estimate the levels of TNF-alpha and activated TGF-beta1 proteins. Seven of 37 patients studied had no TNF-alpha protein before treatment but showed induction of TNF-alpha after GRID radiation. Three patients showed faint basal level of TNF-alpha protein before treatment and these levels were induced after treatment. Three patients showed a basal level of TNF-alpha protein before treatment and these levels decreased after treatment. In 21 cases no TNF-alpha protein was detected before or after treatment at the time points measured. In the case of TGF-beta1 protein, 2 patients showed no TGF-beta1 protein before GRID radiation and an induction of TGF-beta1 protein was observed after treatment. Seven patients showed basal level of TGF-beta1 protein prior to treatment and these levels were induced after treatment. Seventeen patients showed a basal level of TGF-beta1 protein before treatment and these levels decreased after treatment. In 8 cases no TGF-beta1 protein was detected before or after treatment. Complete clinical response (CR) to GRID therapy was seen in 12/37 (32%) treatment sites and partial response (PR) in 18/37 (49%) treatment sites. A strong correlation was observed between clinical CR rate and TNF-alpha induction. The rate of CR was 6/10 (60%) in patients where TNF-alpha was induced as compared to 6/27 (23%) treatment sites in patients where TNF-alpha induction was not seen (p = 0.029). No significant correlation with CR rate and TGF-beta1 induction (44% vs. 28%, p = 0.36) was observed. High dose spatially fractionated (GRID) radiation results in significant induction of TNF-alpha that can be measured in serum of some patients 24 72 hours after radiation. Complete tumor response strongly correlated with the induction of TNF-alpha levels in the serum.

WR-2721 reduces intestinal toxicity from concurrent gemcitabine and radiation treatment

BACKGROUND

The nucleoside analog gemcitabine is a potent radiosensitizer of both tumor and normal mucosa, so severe toxic reactions have resulted from its combination with radiation in some clinical treatment schedules for pancreatic cancer. WR-2721 (amifostine) has been shown to reduce normal tissue toxicity produced from both radiation treatment and some chemotherapeutics. The aim of this study was to determine if WR-2721 can protect the gastrointestinal mucosa from injury by concurrent gemcitabine and radiation treatment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Gemcitabine was injected ip into C3Hf/Kam mice at a concentration of 33 mg/kg 24 h before whole-body irradiation. A single dose (200 mg/kg) of WR-2721 was given 30 min before the radiation treatment or 30 min before gemcitabine or at both times. A quantitative assessment of the chemotherapy/radiation-induced damage was carried out using the mouse microcolony assay for stem cell survival in the intestinal crypts.

RESULTS

WR-2721 given 30 min before gemcitabine followed 24 h later by radiation did not confer any protection to the jejunum (DMF 0.95). However, WR-2721 administered 30 min before radiation without or with prior gemcitabine produced protection factors (PF) of 1.35 and 1.42

CONCLUSIONS

WR-2721 did not directly protect the gastrointestinal mucosa from gemcitabine toxicity, but it did protect the gemcitabine-radiosensitized mucosa from acute radiation damage by a factor of 1.42. Therefore, in clinical treatment protocols using concurrent chemoradiation with gemcitabine, WR-2721 may have clinical utility in protecting against radiation-induced mucosal toxicity.