Locoregional failure of postmastectomy patients with 1-3 positive axillary lymph nodes without adjuvant radiotherapy

Patterns of supraclavicular area failure after mastectomy in breast cancer patients: implications for target volume delineation

Purpose

To characterize the pattern of post-mastectomy supraclavicular lymph node (LN) metastases in patients with breast cancer (BC) and to provide insights for individualized clinical target volume delineation for radiotherapy.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 88 patients with BC who developed post-mastectomy regional LN metastases. The affected regional LNs were categorized as the ipsilateral medial supraclavicular LN area (IMSC-LN), ipsilateral lateral supraclavicular LN area (ILSC-LN), ipsilateral infraclavicular LN area (IIC-LN), and ≥2 groups in the ipsilateral clavicular LN area (MMIC-LN). Clinical characteristics were included in a multivariate analysis to identify risk factors for clavicular LN metastases.

Results

The ILSC-LNs (68.2%) were the most common metastatic site. IMSC-LN metastases showed a significant association with estrogen-receptor (ER) negative status, left-sided BC, and positive axillary LNs. Tumor size ≥2.4 cm and Her2 type were predictors of ILSC-LN metastases. Additionally, tumor size ≥2.4 cm, and level I ipsilateral axillary metastases were associated with MMIC-LN metastasis.

Conclusion

ILSC-LN was the most frequently affected group of supraclavicular lymph nodes. ER-negative status, left-sided BC, tumor size, and positive ipsilateral axillary LNs are potentially associated with the pattern of supraclavicular LN metastatic involvement.

Impact of postmastectomy radiotherapy on the outcomes of breast cancer patients with T1-2 N1 disease : An individual patient data analysis of three clinical trials

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) on overall survival and relapse-free survival among breast cancer patients with T1-T2 N1 disease who received standard adjuvant systemic therapy.

METHODS

This is an individual patient data pooled analysis of 1053 breast cancer patients referred for adjuvant therapy in three clinical trials (BIG 02/98, BCIRG001, and BCIRG005). Overall survival was assessed according to whether or not patients received adjuvant radiotherapy through Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses of predictors of overall and relapse-free survival were conducted through Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Locoregional relapse rates (after a median follow up of 116 months) were 5.6% among patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy vs. 6.6% among patients who did not receive adjuvant radiotherapy. Actuarial 5‑ and 10-year locoregional relapse-free survival rates were 94 and 93%, respectively, among patients who did not receive adjuvant radiotherapy versus 95 and 92% among patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy. The following factors were associated with worse overall survival in multivariate Cox regression analysis: age < 40 years (P < 0.0001), T2 stage (P = 0.004), higher lymph node ratio (P < 0.0001), and negative hormone receptor status (P < 0.0001). Likewise, the following factors were predictive of shorter locoregional relapse-free survival: age ≤ 40 (P < 0.0001), no PMRT (P = 0.034), fluorouracil/adriamycin/cyclophosphamide (FAC) chemotherapy (P = 0.001), and higher T stage (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

The current analysis does not show a beneficial impact of PMRT on overall or relapse-free survival among patients with T1-T2 N1 disease who received standard adjuvant systemic therapy. There is, however, evidence of improvement in locoregional relapse-free survival with PMRT. These findings need to be prospectively validated.

Impact of Regional Nodal Irradiation on the Outcomes of N1 Breast Cancer Patients Referred for Adjuvant Treatment: A Patient-Level Pooled Analysis of 2 Clinical Trials

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of regional nodal irradiation (RNI) among N1 operable breast cancer patients who underwent adequate axillary dissection and received adjuvant chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a pooled analysis of 812 breast cancer patients referred for adjuvant systemic therapy in 2 prospective randomized studies: NCT00174655 (BIG 02/98) and NCT00312208 (BCIRG005). Overall survival was assessed according to whether patients received supraclavicular and/or internal mammary radiotherapy through Kaplan-Meier estimates. Univariate and multivariate analyses of variables affecting overall and relapse-free survival were performed through Cox regression analysis. Additionally, recurrence rates were analyzed according to regional irradiation patterns.

RESULTS

Regional relapse rates (after a median follow-up of 76 months) were 1.5% in both groups of patients who received or did not receive supraclavicular radiotherapy. The risk of regional recurrence was 0.7% in patients who received internal mammary node radiotherapy versus 1.6% in patients who did not receive internal mammary node radiotherapy. The following factors were associated with worse overall survival in multivariate Cox regression analysis: age < 40 years (P < .0001), > T1 stage (P = .003), and negative hormone receptor status (P = .002). Neither supraclavicular nor internal mammary radiotherapy was associated with improvement in overall or relapse-free survival in Cox regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

The current analysis does not endorse the routine use of supraclavicular or internal mammary radiotherapy among N1 operable breast cancer patients who have undergone adequate dissection of axillary lymph nodes and who have received standard adjuvant systemic therapy. Given the limited power and potential selection bias of the current analysis, further prospective studies are needed to tackle this research question.

Optimizing Breast Cancer Adjuvant Radiation and Integration of Breast and Reconstructive Surgery

Postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) reduces the risk of locoregional and distant recurrence and improves overall survival in women with lymph node-positive breast cancer. Because of stage migration and improvements in systemic therapy and other aspects of breast cancer care, the absolute benefit of PMRT and regional nodal irradiation may be small in some favorable subsets of patients with very low nodal burden, and newer consensus guidelines do not mandate PMRT in all node-positive cases. The use and need for PMRT may considerably complicate breast reconstruction after mastectomy and therefore mandates multidisciplinary input that takes into account patient choice given potential risk of acute and long-term toxicities, benefits, life expectancy, the biology of the tumor, plans for systemic therapy, and actual tumor burden. Management of axillary lymph node metastases is changing with selective use of axillary lymph node dissection for advanced disease, sentinel lymph node biopsy alone for clinically and pathologic node-negative cases receiving mastectomy, and targeted axillary dissection alone among patients with eradication of initial biopsy-proven nodal metastases with neoadjuvant systemic therapy use. In general, when the need for PMRT is anticipated, autologous reconstruction should be delayed. This comprehensive article reviews the current indications and implications regarding integration of breast cancer surgery and timing of reconstruction with optimum radiation delivery to achieve the best possible patient outcomes.

Predictive Value of Molecular Subtyping for Locoregional Recurrence in Early-Stage Breast Cancer with N1 without Postmastectomy Radiotherapy

Purpose

This study was designed to investigate the relationship between molecular subtype and locoregional recurrence (LRR) in patients with early-stage breast cancer with 1–3 positive axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) and improve the individualized indications for postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT).

Methods

The records of 701 patients with pT1-2N1M0 breast cancer who did not undergo PMRT were retrospectively analyzed. Tumors were subclassified as follows: luminal A, luminal B, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-enriched, and basal-like subtypes. Multivariate Cox analysis was used to determine the risk of LRR associated with the different subtypes and to adjust for clinicopathologic factors.

Results

Luminal A, luminal B, HER2-enriched, and basal-like subtypes accounted for 51.2%, 28.0%, 8.1%, and 12.7% of cases, respectively. The median follow-up duration was 67 months (range, 9–156 months). Univariate analysis revealed that, compared with the luminal A subtype, the HER2-enriched and basal-like subtypes were associated with significantly higher 5-year LRR rates (5.6% vs. 21.6% and vs.15.7% respectively; p=0.002 each), lower 5-year LRR-free survival (LRFS) rates (90.6% vs. 73.8% and 78.5%, respectively; p=0.001 each), and poorer 5-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) rates (93.7% vs. 82.2% [p=0.002] and 84.9% [p=0.001], respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that the HER2-enriched and basal-like subtypes, age ≤35 years, a medial tumor, and pT2 stage were poor prognostic factors for LRR and LRFS; furthermore, 2 to 3 positive ALNs represented an independent prognostic factor affecting LRR. The 10-year LRR rates of patients with 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 risk factors were 1.0%, 6.9%, 14.3%, 30.4%, and 54.3%, respectively (p<0.001); the 10-year BCSS rates were 86.6%, 88.5%, 84.4%, 79.7%, and 38.8%, respectively (p<0.001).

Conclusion

Molecular subtyping allows for individualized evaluation of LRR risk in patients with pT1-2N1M0 breast cancer. PMRT should be recommended for patients with ≥3 LRR risk factors.

Article Commentary: Surgical Management of the Axilla in Breast Cancer

This article offers a review of the literature on current surgical management of the axilla in breast cancer. This includes the decision-making process involved in clinically node-negative patients versus clinically node-positive patients, with discussion of the indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy versus axillary dissection. It also examines the surgical axillary management of patients who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This article will help update practicing surgeons on the evolving research and guidelines for the management of breast cancer axillary disease.

Supraclavicular and infraclavicular lymph node delineation in breast cancer patients: a proposal deriving from a comparative study

AIMS AND BACKGROUND

Current advances in radiotherapy for breast cancer require knowledge of the anatomy of irradiated areas to minimize geographic miss and spare organs at risk. This study aimed at defining a contouring approach for supraclavicular (SC) and infraclavicular (IC) nodes after mastectomy or conservative surgery in patients with breast cancer.

METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN

In 15 patients, SC and IC nodes were contoured on computed tomography slices according to Madu et al and Dijkema et al. After analyzing relapse sites, as reported by Reed et al, our approach was defined. The 3 methods were compared in all patients, quantifying differences in contours by percentage overlap (PO).

RESULTS

In our approach, SC node delineation is similar to Madu et al in the ventral and medial landmarks, but includes the lateral SC nodes described by Dijkema et al. The lateral landmarks are the scalenus anterior and medius muscle lateral border and the clavicle. Dorsal boundaries are the scalenus anterior and medius muscle ventral and lateral surfaces and the subclavian artery ventral border. In IC node delineation, major differences emerged in cranial and dorsal limits which, in our approach, are the pectoralis minor muscle upper edge and the subclavian axillary artery ventral side. Our mean and median volumes and POs were between the other 2 methods.

CONCLUSIONS

This study contributes to standardizing draining node contouring, so as to reduce variability and minimize geographic miss.

Dosimetric analysis of the brachial plexus among patients with breast cancer treated with post-mastectomy radiotherapy to the ipsilateral supraclavicular area: report of 3 cases of radiation-induced brachial plexus neuropathy

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the brachial plexus (BP) dose of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) to the ipsilateral supraclavicular (ISCL) area, and report the characteristics of radiation-induced brachial plexus neuropathy (RIBPN).

Methods

The BP dose of 31 patients who received adjuvant PMRT to the ISCL area and chest wall using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and the records of 3 patients with RIBPN were retrospectively analyzed based on the standardized Radiation Therapy Oncology Group-endorsed guidelines. The total dose to the ISCL area and chest wall was 50 Gy in 25 fractions.

Results

Patients with a higher number of removed lymph nodes (RLNs) had a higher risk of RIBPN (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.189, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.005-1.406, p = 0.044). In 31 patients treated with 3DCRT, the mean dose to the BP without irradiation to the ISCL area was significantly less than that with irradiation to the ISCL area (0.97 ± 0.20 vs. 44.39 ± 4.13 Gy, t = 136.75, p <0.001). In the 3DCRT plans with irradiation to the ISCL area and chest wall, the maximum dose to the BP was negatively correlated with age (r = −0.40, p = 0.026), body mass index (BMI) (r = −0.44, p = 0.014), and body weight (r = −0.45, p = 0.011). Symptoms of the 3 patients with RIBPN occurred 37–65 months after radiotherapy, and included progressive upper extremity numbness, pain, and motor disturbance. After treatment, 1 patient was stable, and the other 2 patients’ symptoms worsened.

Conclusions

The incidence of RIBPN was higher in patients with a higher number of RLNs after PMRT. The dose to the BP is primarily from irradiation of the ISCL area, and is higher in slim and young patients. Prevention should be the main focus of managing RIBPN, and the BP should be considered an organ-at-risk when designing a radiotherapy plan for the ISCL area.

Post-mastectomy radiotherapy benefits subgroups of breast cancer patients with T1-2 tumor and 1-3 axillary lymph node(s) metastasis

Background

To determine the role of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in breast cancer patients with T1–2 and N1 disease.

Patients and methods.

A total of 207 postmastectomy women were enrolled. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of locoregional recurrence rate (LRR), distant recurrence rate (DRR) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by different tumor characteristics. Multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards modeling.

Results

With median follow-up 59.5 months, the 5-year LRR, DRR and OS were 9.1%, 20.3% and 84.4%, respectively. On univariate analysis, age < 40 years old (p = 0.003) and Her-2/neu over-expression (p = 0.016) were associated with higher LRR, whereas presence of LVI significantly predicted higher DRR (p = 0.026). Negative estrogen status (p = 0.033), Her-2/neu overexpression (p = 0.001) and LVI (p = 0.01) were significantly correlated with worse OS. PMRT didn’t prove to reduce 5-year LRR (p = 0.107), as well as 5-year OS (p = 0.918). In subgroup analysis, PMRT showed significant benefits of improvement LRR and OS in patients with positive LVI.

Conclusions

For patients with T1–2 and N1 stage breast cancer, PMRT can decrease locoregional recurrence and increase overall survival only in patients with lymphovascular invasion.

Locoregional recurrence risk for patients with T1,2 breast cancer with 1-3 positive lymph nodes treated with mastectomy and systemic treatment

PURPOSE

Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) has been shown to benefit breast cancer patients with 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes, but it is unclear how modern changes in management have affected the benefits of PMRT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively analyzed the locoregional recurrence (LRR) rates in 1027 patients with T1,2 breast cancer with 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes treated with mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy with or without PMRT during an early era (1978-1997) and a later era (2000-2007). These eras were selected because they represented periods before and after the routine use of sentinel lymph node surgery, taxane chemotherapy, and aromatase inhibitors.

RESULTS

19% of 505 patients treated in the early era and 25% of the 522 patients in the later era received PMRT. Patients who received PMRT had significantly higher-risk disease features. PMRT reduced the rate of LRR in the early era cohort, with 5-year rates of 9.5% without PMRT and 3.4% with PMRT (log-rank P=.028) and 15-year rates 14.5% versus 6.1%, respectively; (Cox regression analysis: adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 0.37, P=.035). However, PMRT did not appear to benefit patients treated in the later cohort, with 5-year LRR rates of 2.8% without PMRT and 4.2% with PMRT (P=.48; Cox analysis: AHR 1.41, P=.48). The most significant factor predictive of LRR for the patients who did not receive PMRT was the era in which the patient was treated (AHR 0.35 for later era, P<.001).

CONCLUSION

The risk of LRR for patients with T1,2 breast cancer with 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes treated with mastectomy and systemic treatment is highly dependent on the era of treatment. Modern treatment advances and the selected use of PMRT for those with high-risk features have allowed for identification of a cohort at very low risk for LRR without PMRT.

Real-world outcomes of postmastectomy radiotherapy in breast cancer patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the treatment outcomes and to explore the determinants of clinical outcome in breast cancer patients with 1-3 positive nodes who did or did not receive postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in a tertiary care referral cancer center in Northern Thailand.

METHODS

We investigated a retrospective cohort of registered breast cancer patients at the Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand from 2001-2007. Analysis was performed using Cox regression models to identify factors affecting the overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) rates. Comparisons were made between two cohorts: women who received adjuvant PMRT (74 patients) and women who did not receive adjuvant PMRT (81 patients).

RESULTS

A total of 155 patients were included with a median follow-up period of 4.45 years. There was a statistically significant 4-year OS difference between the two groups of patients: 100% for the PMRT group and 93.1% for the non-PMRT group (P = 0.044). The 4-year RFS was 85.9% for patients receiving PMRT and 78.3% for patients who did not receive PMRT (P = 0.291). On multivariate analysis of OS, using hormonal treatment was the only significant independent factor associated with improved OS. On multivariate analysis of RFS, none of the variables were significantly associated with improved RFS. PMRT was notfound to be a prognostic variable related to the outcome of patients using a logistic regression model.

CONCLUSION

Our retrospective, hospital-based analysis demonstrated that PMRT improved the treatment outcome in terms of OS for women with 1-3 node positive early-stage breast cancer.

Postmastectomy radiation therapy

Many women undergo mastectomy as treatment of their breast cancer either because of personal preference or because of tumor-related factors making mastectomy the preferred surgical option. The use of postmastectomy radiation therapy has been shown to decrease the risk of local recurrence and in some cases improve overall survival. Decisions regarding the need for postmastectomy radiation therapy can be complex and rely on careful review of many factors. Lymph node status, tumor size, tumor grade, receptor status, presence or absence of lymphovascular space invasion, Her-2/neu status, margin width, and patient age all need to be considered when making recommendations for or against postmastectomy radiation therapy. In this article, we provide a review of the relevant literature pertaining to postmastectomy radiation therapy in order to help guide this decision-making process.

Irradiation after surgery for breast cancer patients with primary tumours and one to three positive axillary lymph nodes: yes or no?

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed clinicopathologic features and survival in breast cancer patients who had T1 or T2 primary tumours and 1-3 histologically involved axillary lymph nodes and who were treated with modified radical mastectomy without adjuvant radiotherapy (rt). We also explored prognosis to find the high- and low-risk groups.

RESULTS

From May 2001 to April 2005, 368 patients treated at Tianjin Tumor Hospital met the study criteria. The 5- and 8-year rates were 7.2% and 10.7% for locoregional recurrence (lrr), 85.1% and 77.7% for disease-free survival (dfs), and 92.8% and 89.3% for overall survival (os). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that age, tumour size, estrogen receptor (er) status, and lymphovascular invasion (lvi) were independent prognostic factors for lrr and dfs. Based on 4 patient-related factors that indicate poor prognosis (age < 40 years, tumour > 3 cm, er negativity, and lvi), the high-risk group (patients with 3 or 4 factors, accounting for 12.5% of the cohort) had 5- and 8-year rates of 24.3% and 36.9% for lrr, 57.2% and 39.2% for dfs, and 74.8% and 43.8% for os compared with 5.0% and 7.1% for lrr, 88.9% and 83.1% for dfs, 91.6% and 83.4% for os in the low-risk group (patients with 0-2 factors, accounting for 87.5% of the cohort; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study identified several risk factors that correlated independently with a greater incidence of lrr and distant metastasis in patients with T1 and T2 breast cancer and 1-3 positive nodes. Patients with 0-2 risk factors may not be likely to benefit from post-mastectomy rt, but patients with 3-4 risk factors may need rt to optimize locoregional control and improve survival.

Post-mastectomy radiotherapy for breast cancer patients with t1-t2 and 1-3 positive lymph nodes: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in patients with T1-2 and 1-3 positive lymph nodes remains controversial. The aim of this study is to investigate the possible benefits of PMRT for this subgroup.

METHODS

Three electronic databases were systematically quarried (Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE) for published studies evaluating the effects of PMRT on breast cancer patients with T1-T2 tumors with 1-3 positive lymph nodes. Of the 334 studies identified, information was available for 3432 patients from 10 clinical studies. Pooled relative risk estimates (RR) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the inverse variance weighted approach, publication bias and chi-square test were also calculated.

RESULTS

From the 10 studies, the pooled RR (RRs) for locoregional recurrence (LRR) with PMRT was 0.348 (95% CI = 0.254 to 0.477), suggesting a significant benefit for PMRT to decrease the risk of LRR in patients with T1-T2 tumors and 1-3 positive nodes (p<0.05). Reporting bias ( Begg's p = 0.152; Egger's p = 0.107) or significant heterogeneity (Cochran's p = 0.380; I(2) = 6.7%) were not detected. For further subset analysis, the RR for T1, N1-3+ tumors was 0.330 (95% CI = 0.171 to 0.639); for T2, N1-3+ tumors the RR was 0.226 (95% CI = 0.121 to 0.424). The pooled RR for overall survival (OS) was not significantly different between PMRT and no-PMRT group (1.051, 95% CI =1.001 to 1.104).

CONCLUSIONS

Our pooled analysis revealed that PMRT significantly reduces the risk of LRR in patients with TI-T2 tumors with 1-3 positive nodes, and the magnitude of the LRR risk reduction is slightly greater for larger tumors. Our results suggest that PMRT should be considered for patients with T1/T2 tumors with 1-3 positive nodes to decrease the relatively high risk of LRR.

Radiotherapy can improve the disease-free survival rate in triple-negative breast cancer patients with T1-T2 disease and one to three positive lymph nodes after mastectomy

PURPOSE

Several studies have demonstrated poor locoregional control in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), compared with other molecular subtypes of breast cancer. We sought to evaluate whether or not postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) improves locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) outcomes in TNBC patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between January 2000 and July 2007, 553 TNBC patients treated with modified radical mastectomy from a single institution were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were categorized into three groups: low risk (stage T1-T2N0), intermediate risk (stage T1-T2N1), and high risk (stage T3-T4 and/or N2-N3). Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association between PMRT and LRFS and DFS times after adjusting for other clinicopathologic covariates.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 65 months (range, 1-140 months), 51 patients (9.2%) developed locoregional recurrence and 135 patients (24.4%) experienced disease recurrence. On multivariate analysis, PMRT was associated with significantly longer LRFS and DFS times in the entire cohort. In the intermediate-risk group, PMRT was associated with a longer DFS time but not with the LRFS interval. In the high-risk group, PMRT was associated with significantly longer LRFS and DFS times.

CONCLUSION

PMRT is associated with longer LRFS and DFS times in high-risk TNBC patients and a longer DFS time in intermediate-risk TNBC patients. Prospective randomized studies are needed to investigate the best locoregional treatment approaches for patients with this molecular subtype of breast cancer.

The impact of the size of nodal metastases on recurrence risk in breast cancer patients with 1-3 positive axillary nodes after mastectomy

PURPOSE

Use of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) in breast cancer patients with 1-3 positive nodes is controversial. The objective of this study was to determine whether the size of nodal metastases in this subset could predict who would benefit from PMRT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We analyzed 250 breast cancer patients with 1-3 positive nodes after mastectomy treated with contemporary surgery and systemic therapy at our institution. Of these patients, 204 did not receive PMRT and 46 did receive PMRT. Local and regional recurrence risks were stratified by the size of the largest nodal metastasis measured as less than or equal to 5 mm or greater than 5 mm.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 65.6 months. In the whole group, regional recurrences occurred in 2% of patients in whom the largest nodal metastasis measured 5 mm or less vs 6% for those with metastases measuring greater than 5 mm. For non-irradiated patients only, regional recurrence rates were 2% and 9%, respectively. Those with a maximal nodal size greater than 5 mm had a significantly higher cumulative incidence of regional recurrence (P=.013). The 5-year cumulative incidence of a regional recurrence in the non-irradiated group was 2.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7%-7.2%) for maximal metastasis size of 5 mm or less, 6.9% (95% CI, 1.7%-17.3%) for metastasis size greater than 5 mm, and 16% (95% CI, 3.4%-36.8%) for metastasis size greater than 10 mm. The impact of the maximal nodal size on regional recurrences became insignificant in the multivariable model.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes undergoing mastectomy without radiation, nodal metastasis greater than 5 mm was associated with regional recurrence after mastectomy, but its effect was modified by other factors (such as tumor stage). The size of the largest nodal metastasis may be useful to identify high-risk patients who may benefit from radiation therapy after mastectomy.

Comparison of clinical outcome of breast cancer patients with T1-2 tumor and one to three positive nodes with or without postmastectomy radiation therapy

OBJECTIVE

The value of postmastectomy radiation therapy for breast cancer patients with T1-2 tumor and one to three positive nodes remains controversial. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical outcomes of breast cancer patients with T1-2 and one to three positive nodes with and without postmastectomy radiation therapy.

METHODS

Between May 1990 and June 2008, of 318 breast cancer patients with T1-2 and one to three positive nodes who had undergone modified radical mastectomy, 163 received postmastectomy radiation therapy and 155 did not. The clinico-pathologic characteristics were analyzed for clinical outcomes including loco-regional recurrence, distant metastasis, disease-free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

During the median follow-up period of 102 months, the clinical outcomes in postmastectomy radiation therapy versus no-postmastectomy radiation therapy groups were as follows: loco-regional recurrence rate (3.1 versus 11.0%, P= 0.006); distant metastasis rate (20.9 versus 27.7%, P= 0.152); 10-year disease-free survival rate (73.8 versus 61.3%, P= 0.001); and 10-year overall survival rate (82.1 versus 76.1%, P= 0.239). Through a multivariate analysis, a positive nodal ratio of ≥25% (hazard ratio= 4.571, P= 0.003) and positive lymphovascular invasion (hazard ratio= 2.738, P= 0.028) were found to be independent poor prognostic predictors of loco-regional recurrence. The reduction in loco-regional recurrence (hazard ratio= 0.208, P= 0.004) by postmastectomy radiation therapy was found to be significant.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of our results, postmastectomy radiation therapy is highly recommended for breast cancer patients with T1-2 and one to three positive nodes, especially for high-risk subgroups with a positive nodal ratio of ≥25% and positive lymphovascular invasion, not only for reducing loco-regional recurrence but also for improving disease-free survival.

Impact of postmastectomy radiation on locoregional recurrence in breast cancer patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes treated with modern systemic therapy

PURPOSE

Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) remains controversial for patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes (LN+).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We conducted a retrospective review of all 369 breast cancer patients with 1-3 LN+ who underwent mastectomy without neoadjuvant systemic therapy between 2000 and 2007 at Cleveland Clinic.

RESULTS

We identified 271 patients with 1-3 LN+ who did not receive PMRT and 98 who did receive PMRT. The median follow-up time was 5.2 years, and the median number of LN dissected was 11. Of those not treated with PMRT, 79% received adjuvant chemotherapy (of whom 70% received a taxane), 79% received hormonal therapy, and 5% had no systemic therapy. Of the Her2/neu amplified tumors, 42% received trastuzumab. The 5-year rate of locoregional recurrence (LRR) was 8.9% without PMRT vs 0% with PMRT (P=.004). For patients who did not receive PMRT, univariate analysis showed 6 risk factors significantly (P<.05) correlated with LRR: estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor negative (hazard ratio [HR] 2.6), lymphovascular invasion (HR 2.4), 2-3 LN+ (HR 2.6), nodal ratio >25% (HR 2.7), extracapsular extension (ECE) (HR 3.7), and Bloom-Richardson grade III (HR 3.1). The 5-year LRR rate was 3.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.1%-6.8%] for patients with 0-1 risk factor vs 14.6% [95% CI, 8.4%-20.9%] for patients with ≥2 risk factors (P=.0006), respectively. On multivariate analysis, ECE (HR 4.3, P=.0006) and grade III (HR 3.6, P=.004) remained significant risk factors for LRR. The 5-year LRR was 4.1% in patients with neither grade III nor ECE, 8.1% with either grade III or ECE, and 50.4% in patients with both grade III and ECE (P<.0001); the corresponding 5-year distant metastasis-free survival rates were 91.8%, 85.4%, and 59.1% (P=.0004), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

PMRT offers excellent control for patients with 1-3 LN+, with no locoregional failures to date. Patients with 1-3 LN+ who have grade III disease and/or ECE should be strongly considered for PMRT.

Prognostic significance of number of positive nodes: a long-term study of one to two nodes versus three nodes in breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

Previous reports of breast cancer have generally analyzed patients with one to three positive lymph nodes as a single group, often leading to controversy regarding the practical clinical applicability. The present study separately analyzed the survival outcomes of Stage T1-T2 breast cancer patients according to whether one, two, or three axillary nodes were pathologically positive.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The records of 5,996 patients were available for analysis from the population-based Saskatchewan provincial registry between 1981 and 1995. Because the reliability of the nodal assessment depends on the number of lymph nodes sampled, only those 755 patients with Stage T1-T2 disease and eight or more nodes examined were analyzed further for overall survival and cause-specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS

Patients with one and two positive nodes had nearly indistinguishable survival plots, but those with three positive nodes had a distinct trend toward worse survival. The overall survival rate of patients with one, two, and three nodes at 5, 10, and 15 years was 82.7%, 77.0%, and 79.0%, 64.8%, 60.9%, and 52.8%, and 48.8%, 48.0%, and 40.9%, respectively (p = .11). The corresponding CSS rates at 5, 10, and 15 years were 89.4%, 82.0%, and 81.3%, 78.87%, 72.9%, and 62.1%, and 72.7%. 69.0%, and 55.6% (p = .0004). The use of regional radiotherapy did not confer any apparent survival benefit in terms of either overall survival or CSS.

CONCLUSION

Patients with one or two positive nodes had a similar CSS. However, those with three positive nodes fared worse, with a significantly reduced CSS compared with those with one or two involved nodes. Thus, the survival data among patients with one to three nodes positive reveals clearly relevant differences when analyzed separately.

Postmastectomy locoregional recurrence and recurrence-free survival in breast cancer patients

Background

One essential outcome after breast cancer treatment is recurrence of the disease. Treatment decision is based on assessment of prognostic factors of breast cancer recurrence. This study was to investigate the prognostic factors for postmastectomy locoregional recurrence (LRR) and survival in those patients.

Methods

114 patients undergoing mastectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy in Cancer Institute of Tehran University of Medical Sciences were retrospectively reviewed between 1996 and 2008. All cases were followed up after initial treatment of patients with breast cancer via regular visit (annually) for discovering the LRR. Cumulative recurrence free survival (RFS) was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method, with univariate comparisons between groups through the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis.

Result

The median follow up time was 84 months (range 2-140). Twenty-three (20.2%) patients developed LRR. Cumulative RFS rate at 2.5 years and 5 years were 86% (95%CI, 81-91) and 82.5% (95%CI, 77-87) respectively. Mean RFS was 116.50 ± 4.43 months (range, 107.82 - 125.12 months, 95%CI). At univariate and multivariate analysis, factors had not any influence on the LRR.

Conclusion

Despite use of adjuvant therapies during the study, we found a LRR rate after mastectomy of 20.2%. Therefore, for patients with LRR without evidence of distant disease, aggressive multimodality therapy is warranted.

Prognostic factors affecting the outcome of salvage radiotherapy for isolated locoregional recurrence after mastectomy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the prognostic factors affecting the outcome of salvage radiotherapy for isolated locoregional recurrence after mastectomy.

METHODS

Between May 1988 and April 2002, 65 breast cancer patients underwent radiotherapy as a component of salvage treatment for isolated locoregional recurrence after mastectomy. The sites of failure were as follows: chest wall in 37 patients, regional lymph nodes (LNs) in 23 patients, and combined chest wall and LNs in 5 patients. None of the patients had previously been treated with radiation. Thirty-nine patients had surgical resection, and 55 patients received systemic chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy for recurrent disease. In 51 cases (78.5%), the chest wall and ipsilateral regional lymphatics including supraclavicular, axillary, and internal mammary LNs were irradiated. Median dose was 50.4 Gy (range: 50-71.5). Median duration of follow-up was 52 months (range: 2-206).

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival rate was 48.1%. On multivariate analysis, patients without initial nodal involvement had better overall survival (P = 0.0118). The 5-year locoregional progression-free survival rate was 69.8%, and time to recurrence (>36 months vs. < or =36 months) had an influence on the outcome with borderline significance (P = 0.0775). The 5-year distant metastasis-free survival rate was 42.1%. Lack of systemic therapy after recurrence (P = 0.0089) and age <50 years at recurrence (P = 0.0145) were significant prognostic factors predicting poor distant metastasis-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiotherapy for isolated locoregional relapse after mastectomy achieved locoregional control in about two-thirds of patients. Major pattern of failure was distant relapse, and systemic therapy is warranted to prevent secondary dissemination.

[Risk factors for tumor recurrence after breast conserving therapy: about 254 cases]

OBJECTIVES

To retrospectively study our risk factors of recurrence of infiltrating breast cancers treated by conservative therapy in Saint-Etienne university hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1997 to 2000, 254 patients were treated by conservative treatment. Through a univariate then multivariate analysis we identified factors of locoregional and metastatic recurrences.

RESULTS

The global rate of recurrence is 21.6%. There is 9.8% of local recurrence, 2.3% of node recurrence and 14.9% of metastatic one. Plurifocality OR: 3.7, tumoral type OR: 2.93, lymphovascular invasion OR: 3.6 and young age are factors of locoregional recurrence. For distant metastases, the recurrences factors are the tumoral size, the node status, the absence of estrogens receptors, the SBR rank, the locoregional recurrence, the rise of CA 15-3 and the addition of chemotherapy but only the SBR rank OR: 2.56 appears in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

On one hand, this study revealed known risk factors already used to decide on the adjuvant therapy. On the other hand, plurifocality and lobular cancer must be taken into consideration before a conservative therapy. The surgery will probably be more extensive under these conditions.

Loco-regional recurrence in 2064 patients with breast cancer treated with mastectomy without adjuvant radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

We investigated the incidence of loco-regional recurrence in a sub-group of patients who underwent mastectomy without adjuvant radiotherapy to evaluate the effect of each specific clinical or pathological parameter that could be associated with a higher local relapse rate.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two thousand and sixty-four patients were treated from January 1971 to December 2003 at the University of Florence.

RESULTS

At the time of analysis 18.3% of patients (378/2064) had isolated loco-regional failures. Univariate analysis showed an association of borderline statistical significance with pathological tumour size. Elderly age at diagnosis had a low incidence of local recurrence but the results did not reach statistical significant. The number of positive axillary lymph node did not show any influence for local recurrence.

CONCLUSION

In our series we noted a higher relapse rate only related to the pathological tumour size without any correlation with number of positive axillary nodes. Radiotherapy after mastectomy still remains controversial, but in our series the number of positive axillary lymph node did not seem enough to justify adjuvant treatment.

Local recurrence in breast carcinoma patients with T1–2 and 1–3 positive nodes: Indications for radiotherapy

AIMS

To investigate the relationship between local recurrence (LR) and distant recurrence (DR) and to determine a subgroup of patients who could benefit from radiotherapy among breast carcinoma patients with T(1-2) and N(1a).

METHODS

Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were carried out in the retrospective data of 326 eligible patients.

RESULTS

Fourteen (4.3%) patients had LR and 46 (14.1%) patients suffered DR, in their follow-up periods. The multivariate time-dependent Cox model for DR showed that ratio of positive nodes (PN) (p=0.004; hazard ratio (HR), 1.05; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-1.09) and LR (p=0.05; HR, dependent on time) were strongly associated with DR. In the multivariate Cox analysis for LR, age (<or=35 years vs >35 years; p<0.0001; HR, 6.8; CI, 2.3-19.9), lymphatic vascular invasion (LVI) (yes vs no; p=0.03; HR, 3.3; CI, 1.2-9.8), and a ratio of PN (>15% vs <or=15%; p<0.0001; HR, 13.0; CI, 3.9-42.0) were the most important prognostic factors. Whereas patients with 2 or 3 risk factors were accepted as the high risk group for LR, those with no or 1 risk factor were considered as the low risk group. These groups had a 23% LR rate and a 2.7% LR rate, respectively (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This report confirmed the importance of local recurrence for distant recurrence. Age, ratio of PN and LVI were the most important prognostic factors for LR. The T(1-2) and N(1a) patients who had 2 or 3 risk factors might benefit from radiotherapy.

Lymph Node Ratio is More Valuable than Level III Involvement for Prediction of Outcome in Node-Positive Breast Carcinoma Patients

BACKGROUND

We examined the relationship between different expressions of positive axillary lymph nodes (PN) and the outcomes of node-positive breast carcinoma patients to determine the best predictor(s) among these expressions and to assess whether anatomic high level involvement is an independent prognostic factor.

STUDY DESIGN

In this retrospective study, the primary endpoints were distant recurrence (DR), locoregional recurrences (LRR), and disease-free survival (DFS). Univariate and multivariate prognostic factor analyses were carried out using survival and regression methods in the data of 704 patients with PN.

RESULTS

In multivariate analysis, the number of PN, ratio of PN, log odds of PN, and level III (L-III) involvement, separately, were significant factors for DR in addition to age, tumor size, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI). In the final model including all expressions of nodal involvement, age (continuous P = 0.001; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.98; 95% confidence Interval [95% CI]: 0.96-0.99), tumor size (continuous: P < 0.0001; HR: 1.3; 95% CI, 1.2-1.5), LVI (yes vs. no: P = 0.005; HR: 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.2), and ratio of PN (continuous: P = 0.02; HR: 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.06) were the independent prognostic factors for DR. For LRR, ratio of PN (continuous: P = 0.001; HR: 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03) was the most important factor in addition to age (continuous: P = 0.02; HR: 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99) and tumor size (continuous: P = 0.04; HR: 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6). When patients were stratified by number categories of PN (1-3 vs. 4-9 vs. >/= 10), there was no difference between DFSs of patients with and without L-III involvement. In contrast, when patients were stratified by L-III involvement, DFSs according to the number categories were statistically different.

CONCLUSIONS

Ratio of PN was more valuable than number of PN for predicting outcome in node-positive breast carcinoma patients. Level III involvement was not an independent prognostic indicator either for locoregional or for distant recurrences.

Post-mastectomy radiation therapy: Translating local benefits into improved survival

Several randomized trials and the most recent meta-analysis from the Oxford Overview have confirmed the efficacy of post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) in improving local control and long-term survival. The survival advantage of PMRT has been established in patients with a 10% risk of local regional recurrence. Patients with four or more positive lymph nodes fall in this category, even with effective systemic therapy. However, it remains difficult to identify the subset of patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes at highest risk of local recurrence, who would most likely demonstrate a survival benefit with PMRT. When PMRT is used, careful treatment planning, particularly with regard to cardiac dose, is critical to minimizing serious late effects of treatment. Further developments in pathologic stratification of these patients, guided by expression profiles or novel biologic markers, are required to enable individualized assessment of long-term therapeutic risks and benefits.

Should adjuvant radiotherapy to the supraclavicular fossa be routinely given in patients with breast conservative treatment?

BACKGROUND

To analyze the overall outcome, supraclavicular fossa (SCF) recurrence rate, and pattern of failure in breast cancer patients treated with conservative surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy excluding SCF treatment.

METHODS

A total of 143 patients were enrolled in the study. Ninety-two percent of patients were stages I and II, and 8% were stage III. The median age was 44 years, and 31% of patients were </=40 years old. Radiotherapy was delivered to the ipsilateral breast excluding the SCF.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival rate of the cohort was 95%, and disease-free survival rate was 91%. The cumulative incidence of SCF recurrence was 18% in patients with involved axillary nodes (N) >/= 4, and 0.8% in patients with N < 4. The 5-year SCF-recurrence-free survival in patients with N >/= 4 and N < 4 was 80% and 99%, respectively (P < 0.001). N >/= 4 was the only independent predictor for locoregional control (P = 0.045), disease-free survival (P = 0.001), and overall survival (P = 0.008) in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with N >/= 4 have a significantly higher risk of SCF recurrence and poorer survival. The SCF might be safely spared in patients with N < 4, but should be routinely included in the radiotherapy design for those with N >/= 4.

Prognosis of Breast Cancer After Supraclavicular Lymph Node Metastasis: Not a Distant Metastasis

BACKGROUND

We performed this study to analyze the survival of breast cancer patients with isolated supraclavicular lymph node metastasis (SLNM) and assess whether SLNM is distant metastasis or not.

METHODS

Sixty-three patients who developed an isolated SLNM among 3170 primary breast cancer patients between 1990 and 1999 were enrolled. The survival after SLNM was compared with that of 151 patients who developed local recurrences and 599 who had distant metastasis and was analyzed according to different levels and numbers of positive axillary nodes.

RESULTS

Thirty-five of the 63 patients died during a median follow-up of 58.3 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates after SLNM, local relapse, and distant metastasis were 33.6%, 34.9%, and 9.1%, respectively. The 5-year OS for patients with involved nodes confined to axillary level I was 74.4%, which was significantly better than that for involved nodes in level II or III or SLNM (49.2%, 52.8%, and 33.6%, respectively; P < .0001). For one to three positive axillary nodes, the 5-year OS was 83.2%, which was significantly better than that for four to nine positive nodes, more than nine positive nodes, and SLNM (62.6%, 42.3%, and 33.6%, respectively). There was no significant difference between SLNM and more than nine positive nodes. Surgical removal of the supraclavicular nodes was a significantly better prognostic factor for OS after SLNM (P = .0327).

CONCLUSIONS

The 5-year OS after supraclavicular nodal metastosis, local relapse, and distant metastasis were 33.6%, 34.9%, and 9.1%, respectively. Good neck control either by surgery or chemotherapy achieved better survival.

Study of failure pattern among high-risk breast cancer patients with or without postmastectomy radiotherapy in addition to adjuvant systemic therapy: long-term results from the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group DBCG 82 b and c randomized studies

PURPOSE

Postmastectomy radiotherapy (RT) in high-risk breast cancer patients can reduce locoregional recurrences (LRRs) and improve disease-free and overall survival. The aim of this analysis was to examine the overall disease recurrence pattern among patients randomly assigned to receive treatment with or without RT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A long-term follow-up was performed among the 3,083 patients from the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group 82 b and c trials, except in those already recorded with distant metastases (DM) or contralateral breast cancer (CBC). The end points were LRR, DM, and CBC, and the follow-up continued until DM, CBC, emigration, or death. Information was selected from medical records, general practitioners, and the National Causes of Death Registry. The median potential follow-up time was 18 years.

RESULTS

The 18-year probability of any first breast cancer event was 73% and 59% (P < .001) after no RT and RT, respectively (relative risk [RR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.75). The 18-year probability of LRR (with or without DM) was 49% and 14% (P < .001) after no RT and RT, respectively (RR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.27). The 18-year probability of DM subsequent to LRR was 35% and 6% (P < .001) after no RT and RT, respectively (RR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.20), whereas the probability of any DM was 64% and 53% (P < .001) after no RT versus RT, respectively (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.86).

CONCLUSION

Postmastectomy RT changes the disease recurrence pattern in high-risk breast cancer patients; fewer patients have LRR as first site of recurrence, and overall fewer patients have DM.

Quantitative molecular diagnosis of axillary drainage fluid for prediction of locoregional failure in patients with one to three positive axillary nodes after mastectomy without adjuvant radiotherapy

PURPOSE

A quantitative multiple-marker reverse transcriptase (RT)-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for sensitive detection of cancer cells in axillary drainage fluid was developed to examine whether the presence of cancer cells in axillary drainage fluid can be used as a predictor of locoregional recurrence (LRR) in patients with breast cancer who had T1/2 primary tumors and one to three positive axillary lymph nodes treated with modified radical mastectomy without adjuvant radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Axillary drainage fluid was collected from 126 patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast who were treated with modified radical mastectomy and were found to have one to three positive axillary nodes. Cancer cells in axillary drainage fluid were detected by RT-PCR assay using primers specific for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin-19 (CK-19) together with numerous clinicopathologic and treatment-related factors and were analyzed for their impact on LRR.

RESULTS

A total of 38 patients suffered LRR during follow-up and the multimarker RT-PCR assays for CEA and CK-19 in the axillary drainage fluid both were positive in 34 patients (27.0%), of which 29 patients had LRR. In univariate analysis, the 5-year LRR-free survival showed higher rates in patients with PCR-negative findings in axillary drainage fluid (p<0.0001), age>or=40 years old (p<0.0001), tumor size<2.5 cm (p<0.0001), negative lymph-vascular space invasion (p=0.026), and T1 status (<0.0001); in multivariate analysis, PCR-positive findings together with age and tumor size were found to be independent predictors of LRR (all p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Multiplex RT-PCR assay for CEA and CK-19 was highly sensitive for detection and might be useful for prediction of LRR in such subgroup breast cancer patients.

Locoregional recurrence risks in elderly breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy without adjuvant radiotherapy

This study examined tumour and treatment characteristics in elderly women treated with mastectomy without radiotherapy and compared their outcomes to younger counterparts. Data were analysed for 2362 women aged 50 years and older referred to the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Canada between 1989 and 1997. The women had invasive T1-4, N0-N3, M0 breast cancer treated with mastectomy without adjuvant radiotherapy. Clinical characteristics and patient outcomes were compared between two age cohorts: 50-69 (n = 1423) and 70+ years (n = 939). Median follow-up was 8.3 years. Tumours > 5 cm were present in 5% of women aged 50-69 and 3.5% of women aged 70+, respectively. The distribution of nodal stage was similar in the two age cohorts but older women were more likely to have fewer axillary nodes removed (P = 0.009). Fewer women aged 70+ had grade III histology (P = 0.002) and estrogen receptor (ER)-negative status (P < 0.001). The rates of systemic therapy use were comparable in the two age groups. With tumours > 5 cm, locoregional recurrence (LRR) were 13.7% and 30.0% in women aged 50-69 and 70+, respectively. With 1-3 positive nodes (N+), LRR were 14.8% and 13.0% in women aged 50-69 and 70+. In the presence of 4 N+, LRR were 16.8% and 30.8% in women aged 50-69 and 70+. On multivariate analysis, age was not significantly associated with LRR (P = 0.62). Independent prognostic factors for LRR were grade III histology, lymphovascular invasion and positive nodal status. This study suggests that despite more favourable tumour characteristics and comparable systemic therapy use, women aged 70+ years have similar or higher postmastectomy LRR risks compared to younger women. Chronologic age alone should not preclude these women from consideration of adjuvant radiotherapy.

Selecting breast cancer patients with T1-T2 tumors and one to three positive axillary nodes at high postmastectomy locoregional recurrence risk for adjuvant radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To define the individual factors and combinations of factors associated with increased risk of locoregional recurrence (LRR) that may justify postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in patients with T1-T2 breast cancer and one to three positive nodes.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The study cohort comprised 821 women referred to the British Columbia Cancer Agency between 1989 and 1997 with pathologic T1-T2 breast cancer and one to three positive nodes treated with mastectomy without adjuvant RT. The 10-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of isolated LRR and LRR with or without simultaneous distant recurrence (LRR +/- SDR) were analyzed according to age, histologic findings, tumor location, size, and grade, lymphovascular invasion status, estrogen receptor (ER) status, margin status, number of positive nodes, number of nodes removed, percentage of positive nodes, and systemic therapy use. Multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards modeling. A risk classification model was developed using combinations of the statistically significant factors identified on multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 7.7 years. Systemic therapy was used in 94% of patients. Overall, the 10-year Kaplan-Meier isolated LRR and LRR +/- SDR rate was 12.7% and 15.9%, respectively. Without PMRT, a 10-year LRR risk of >20% was identified in women with one to three positive nodes plus at least one of the following factors: age <45 years, Stage T2, histologic Grade 3, ER-negative disease, medial location, more than one positive node, or >25% of nodes positive (all p < 0.05 on univariate analysis). On multivariate analysis, age <45 years, >25% of nodes positive, medial tumor location, and ER-negative status were statistically significant predictors of isolated LRR and LRR +/- SDR. In the classification model, the first split was according to age (<45 years vs. >/=45 years), with 29.3% vs. 13.7% developing LRR +/- SDR (p < 0.0001). Of 123 women <45 years, the presence of >25% of nodes positive was associated with a risk of LRR +/- SDR of 58.0% compared with 23.8% for those with </=25% of nodes positive (p = 0.01). Of 698 women >45 years, the presence of >25% of nodes positive also conferred a greater LRR +/- SDR risk (26.7%) compared with women with </=25% of nodes positive (10.8%; p < 0.0001). In women >45 years with </=25% of nodes positive, tumor location and ER status were factors that could be used to further distinguish low-risk from higher risk subsets.

CONCLUSION

Clinical and pathologic factors can identify women with T1-T2 breast cancer and one to three positive nodes at high LRR risk after mastectomy. Age <45 years, >25% of nodes positive, a medial tumor location, and ER-negative status were statistically significant independent factors associated with greater LRR, meriting consideration and discussion of PMRT. Combinations of these factors further augmented the LRR risk, warranting recommendation of PMRT to optimize locoregional control and potentially improve survival. The absence of high-risk factors identifies women who may reasonably be spared the morbidity of PMRT.

The pattern of lymphatic metastasis of breast cancer and its influence on the delineation of radiation fields

PURPOSE

The delineation of radiation fields should cover the clinical target volume (CTV) and minimally irradiate the surrounding normal tissues and organs. This study was designed to explore the pattern of lymphatic metastasis of breast cancer and indications for radiotherapy after radical or modified radical mastectomy and to discuss the rational delineation of radiation fields.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between September 1980 and December 2003, 78 breast cancer patients receiving extended radical mastectomy in the Margottini model and 61 cases with complete data were analyzed to investigate the internal mammary lymphatic metastatic status. Between March 1988 and December 1988, 46 patients with clinical negative supraclavicular nodes received radical mastectomy plus supraclavicular lymph node dissection. The supraclavicular lymph nodes and axillary lymph nodes were labeled as S and levels I, II, or III, respectively, and examined pathologically. Between January 1996 and April 1999, 412 patients who had radical or modified radical mastectomy underwent the pathologic examination of axillary or levels I, II, or III nodes.

RESULTS

The incidence of internal mammary lymph node metastasis was 24.6%. It was 36.7% for the patients with positive axillary lymph nodes and 12.9% for the patients with negative axillary lymph nodes. All the metastatic internal mammary lymph nodes were located at the first, second, and third intercostal spaces. Skipping metastasis of the supraclavicular and axillary lymph nodes was observed in 3.8% and 8.1% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our data, we suggest that the radiation field for internal mammary lymph nodes should exclude the fourth and fifth intercostal spaces, which may help to reduce the radiation damage to heart. It is unnecessary to irradiate the supraclavicular lymph nodes for the patients with negative axillary level III nodes, even with positive level I and level II nodes.

Evidence-based indications for postmastectomy irradiation

The ASCO guidelines panel found that PMRT reduces the risks of both local-regional recurrence and distant recurrence, and improves survival rates for patients with invasive breast cancer with involved axillary lymph nodes receiving systemic therapy. The benefits of PMRT, however, vary with regards to particular patient subsets (such as those defined by the number of involved axillary nodes). The panel agreed that PMRT is indicated routinely for patients with four or more positive axillary nodes, tumors larger than 5 cm in size, or locally advanced cancers. There was insufficient evidence for the panel to make recommendations or suggestions for the use of PMRT for patients with T1-2 tumors with one to three positive axillary nodes or for all patients receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy. Physicians and patients are encouraged to participate in randomized trials exploring such issues, such as the ongoing intergroup study for patients with one to three positive axillary nodes.

Controversies regarding the use of radiation after mastectomy in breast cancer

Despite years of clinical study, there are still many unanswered questions regarding postmastectomy radiation. It is clear that radiation therapy plays a critical role in the multidisciplinary management of patients with locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer. It is also accepted that postmastectomy radiation is not required for most women with noninvasive disease or stage I disease. Randomized clinical trials studying radiation treatments for women with stage II or III breast cancer have shown that the addition of radiation after mastectomy can reduce local-regional recurrence rates, which then improves survival. However, other data have indicated that the risk of local-regional recurrence after mastectomy and chemotherapy is low for patients with small tumors and one to three positive lymph nodes, leading some to question whether postmastectomy radiation is useful for this group. A second controversy regards the sequencing of postmastectomy radiation and breast reconstruction. In this article we discuss these controversies, review the data that are relevant, and provide our institutional approaches to these issues.