Risk group stratification in patients undergoing permanent (125)I prostate brachytherapy as monotherapy

A retrospective analysis after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy with permanent 125I seed implant: clinical and dosimetric results in 70 patients

Aims and background

To evaluate the biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) rate after 125I permanent-implant prostate brachytherapy.

Methods

Patients with a diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma and adequate PSA follow-up were selected for this retrospective study. Brachytherapy with permanent 125I seeds was performed as monotherapy, with a prescribed dose of 145 Gy to the prostate. Patients were stratified into recurrence risk groups according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Biochemical failure was defined using the American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) guidelines. The post-implant D90 (defined as the minimum dose covering 90% of the prostate) was obtained for each patient. Two cutoff points were used to test the correlation between D90 and bDFS results: 130 Gy and 140 Gy. bDFS was calculated from the implant date to the date of biochemical recurrence. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed using the SPSS software and included clinical stage, pretreatment PSA, Gleason score (GS), androgen deprivation therapy, D90, and risk groups. In the univariate analysis we used a cutoff point of 5.89 ng/mL for PSA and 5 for GS.

Results

From June 2003 to April 2007, 70 patients were analyzed. The patients' distribution into recurrence risk groups was as follows: 39 patients (56%) in the low-risk group, 23 patients (33%) in the intermediate-risk group, and 8 patients (11%) in the high-risk group. At a median follow-up of 47 months (range, 19–70 months) bDFS was 88.4%, with a global actuarial 5-year bDFS of 86%. Disease-related factors including initial PSA level, GS and risk group were significant predictors of biochemical failure (P = 0.01, P = 0.01, P = 0.006, respectively). In multivariate analysis, risk group (P = 0.005) and GS (P = 0.03) were statistically significant.

Conclusion

Our data are in agreement with those in the literature and, despite the short follow-up, confirm the advantage of brachytherapy for patients at low and intermediate risk of recurrence.

Magnetic resonance imaging in prostate brachytherapy: Evidence, clinical end points to data, and direction forward

The integration of multiparametric MRI into prostate brachytherapy has become a subject of interest over the past 2 decades. MRI directed high-dose-rate and low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy offers the potential to improve treatment accuracy and standardize postprocedure quality. This article reviews the evidence to date on MRI utilization in prostate brachytherapy and postulates future pathways for MRI integration.

ACR appropriateness criteria: Permanent source brachytherapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To provide updated American College of Radiology (ACR) appropriateness criteria for transrectal ultrasound-guided transperineal interstitial permanent source brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The ACR appropriateness criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

RESULTS

Permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) is a treatment option for appropriately selected patients with localized prostate cancer with low to very high risk disease. PPB monotherapy remains an appropriate and effective curative treatment for low-risk prostate cancer patients demonstrating excellent long-term cancer control and acceptable morbidity. PPB monotherapy can be considered for select intermediate-risk patients with multiparametric MRI useful in evaluation of such patients. High-risk patients treated with PPB should receive supplemental external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) along with androgen deprivation. Similarly, patients with involved pelvic lymph nodes may also be considered for such combined treatment but reported long-term outcomes are limited. Computed tomography-based postimplant dosimetry completed within 60 days of PPB is essential for quality assurance. PPB may be considered for treatment of local recurrence after EBRT but is associated with an increased risk of toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Updated appropriateness criteria for patient evaluation, selection, treatment, and postimplant dosimetry are given. These criteria are intended to be advisory only with the final responsibility for patient care residing with the treating clinicians.

Current status of brachytherapy for prostate cancer

Brachytherapy was developed to treat prostate cancer 50 years ago. Current advanced techniques using transrectal ultrasonography were established 25 years ago. Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) has enabled the prostate to be viewed with improved resolution with the use of modern ultrasound machines. Moreover, the development of software that can provide images captured in real time has improved treatment outcomes. Other new radiologic imaging technologies or a combination of magnetic resonance and TRUS could be applied to brachytherapy in the future. The therapeutic value of brachytherapy for early-stage prostate cancer is comparable to that of radical prostatectomy in long-term follow-up. Nevertheless, widespread application of brachytherapy cannot be achieved for several reasons. The treatment outcome of brachytherapy varies according to the skill of the operator and differences in patient selection. Currently, only three radioactive isotopes are available for use in low dose rate prostate brachytherapy: I-125, Pd-103, and Cs-131; therefore, more isotopes should be developed. High dose rate brachytherapy using Ir-192 combined with external beam radiation, which is needed to verify the long-term effects, has been widely applied in high-risk patient groups. Recently, tumor-selective therapy or focal therapy using brachytherapy, which is not possible by surgical extraction, has been developed to maintain the quality of life in selected cases. However, this new application for prostate cancer treatment should be performed cautiously because we do not know the oncological outcome, and it would be an interim treatment method. This technique might evolve into a hybrid of whole-gland treatment and focal therapy.

Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging for predicting pathologic T3 disease in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer: implications for prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To determine the ability of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging (erMRI) and other pretreatment factors to predict the presence and extent of extraprostatic extension (EPE) in men with Gleason score (GS) 7 prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We included patients with clinical stage T1c-T2c, GS=7 (3+4 or 4+3), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <10ng/mL who underwent pre-prostatectomy erMRI. We compared pathologic EPE findings with pretreatment factors.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-one men were eligible for inclusion. Pretreatment characteristics were: median age=60 years (42-76); median PSA 4.9ng/mL (0.4-9.9); GS 3+4=61%; T1c=51%; T2a=25%; T2b=21%; T2c=3%; ≥50% positive cores=46%; EPE-positive (EPE+) erMRI=28%. Thirty-three percent had pathologic EPE. Increasing T-stage (p<0.0001) and EPE+ erMRI (p<0.0001) were significant predictors of pathologic EPE, whereas GS (4+3 vs. 3+4) (p=0.14), percentage of positive core biopsies (p=0.15), and pretreatment PSA (p=0.41) were not. Median EPE distance was 1.75mm (range, <1-15mm). The rates of EPE >5mm and EPE >3mm were 11% and 15%, respectively. The odds ratios for erMRI detection of any EPE and of EPE >5mm were 3.06 and 3.75, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

T-stage and EPE+ erMRI predict pathologic EPE in men with GS 7 prostate cancer. The ability of erMRI to detect EPE increases with increasing EPE distance. These findings may be useful in patient selection for prostate brachytherapy monotherapy.

Biochemical control of prostate cancer with iodine-125 brachytherapy alone: experience from a single institution

AIM

Brachytherapy is an adequate option as monotherapy for localised prostate cancer. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare biochemical failure free survival (BFFS) after low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDRB) alone for patients with prostate cancer using ASTRO and Phoenix criteria, and detect prognostic factors.

METHODS

Data on 220 patients treated between 1998 and 2002 with LDRB were retrospectively analysed. Neoadjuvant hormone therapy was used in 74 (33.6%) patients.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 53.5 months (24-116). Five year BFFS was 83.0% and 83.7% using, respectively, the ASTRO and Phoenix criteria. Low -and intermediate- risk patients presented, respectively, 86.7% and 77.8% 5-year BFFS using the ASTRO definition (p=0.069), and 88.5% and 78.6% considering the Phoenix criteria (p=0.016). Bounce was observed in 66 (30%) patients. Multivariate analysis detected PSA at diagnosis <10 ng/ml and less than 50% positive biopsy fragments as favourable prognostic factors, regarding BF using both criteria. For the Phoenix criteria, also Gleason score <7 and low-risk group were identified as independent favourable prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

LDRB alone should be considered mostly for low-risk patients. PSA level was a strong independent prognostic factor. We support the use of the Phoenix criteria for detection of BF in patients submitted to LDRB alone.

High-risk prostate cancer with Gleason score 8-10 and PSA level ≤15 ng/mL treated with permanent interstitial brachytherapy

PURPOSE

With widespread prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening, there has been an increase in men diagnosed with high-risk prostate cancer defined by a Gleason score (GS) ≥8 coupled with a relatively low PSA level. The optimal management of these patients has not been defined. Cause-specific survival (CSS), biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated in brachytherapy patients with a GS ≥8 and a PSA level ≤15 ng/mL with or without androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From April 1995 to October 2005, 174 patients with GS ≥8 and a PSA level ≤15 ng/mL underwent permanent interstitial brachytherapy. Of the patients, 159 (91%) received supplemental external beam radiation, and 113 (64.9%) received ADT. The median follow-up was 6.6 years. The median postimplant Day 0 minimum percentage of the dose covering 90% of the target volume was 121.1% of prescription dose. Biochemical control was defined as a PSA level ≤0.40 ng/mL after nadir. Multiple parameters were evaluated for impact on survival.

RESULTS

Ten-year outcomes for patients without and with ADT were 95.2% and 92.5%, respectively, for CSS (p = 0.562); 86.5% and 92.6%, respectively, for bPFS (p = 0.204); and 75.2% and 66.0%, respectively, for OS (p = 0.179). The median post-treatment PSA level for biochemically controlled patients was <0.02 ng/mL. Multivariate analysis failed to identify any predictors for CSS, whereas bPFS and OS were most closely related to patient age.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with GS ≥8 and PSA level ≤15 ng/mL have excellent bPFS and CSS after brachytherapy with supplemental external beam radiotherapy. The use of ADT did not significantly impact bPFS, CSS, or OS.

Brachytherapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review

Low-dose rate brachytherapy has become a mainstream treatment option for men diagnosed with prostate cancer because of excellent long-term treatment outcomes in low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients. To a great extend due to patient lead advocacy for minimally invasive treatment options, high-quality prostate implants have become widely available in the US, Europe, and Japan. High-dose-rate (HDR) afterloading brachytherapy in the management of localised prostate cancer has practical, physical, and biological advantages over low-dose-rate seed brachytherapy. There are no free live sources used, no risk of source loss, and since the implant is a temporary procedure following discharge no issues with regard to radioprotection use of existing facilities exist. Patients with localized prostate cancer may benefit from high-dose-rate brachytherapy, which may be used alone in certain circumstances or in combination with external-beam radiotherapy in other settings. The purpose of this paper is to present the essentials of brachytherapies techniques along with the most important studies that support their effectiveness in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Permanent prostate seed brachytherapy: a current perspective on the evolution of the technique and its application

This Review highlights current areas of controversy and development in the field of transperineal permanent prostate seed implantation brachytherapy (PPI), in particular the technological evolution of PPI treatment planning that has led to intra-operative treatment planning and execution, the use of MRI spectroscopy and ultrasonography to target intraprostatic tumor foci, and the introduction of (131)Cs as a new PPI isotope. Here we present a comprehensive review of mature data for PPI monotherapy and PPI combined with supplemental external beam radiation therapy, and a critical discussion of issues pertinent to supplemental EBRT. We also present our current policies in the treatment of prostate cancer at the University of California, San Francisco.

Comparison of intraoperative ultrasound with postimplant computed tomography--dosimetric values at Day 1 and Day 30 after prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To compare the results of intraoperative dosimetry with those of postimplant computed tomography (CT)-based dosimetry after (125)I prostate brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We treated 412 prostate cancer patients with (125)I prostate brachytherapy, with or without external beam radiotherapy at our institution. Neoadjuvant hormone therapy was administered to 331 patients (80.3%). Implantation was performed using an intraoperative interactive technique. Postimplant dosimetry was performed on Day 1 and Day 30 using CT imaging. The dosimetric results for the prostate, urethra, and rectum were compared among intraoperative ultrasound, and CT scans of Day 1 and Day 30.

RESULTS

The mean intraoperative minimal dose received by 90% of the prostate volume (D(90)) was 118.8% of the prescribed dose vs. 106.4% for Day 1 (p < 0.01) and 119.2% for Day 30 (p = 0.25). There were no significant correlations between the intraoperative D(90) and the postimplant D(90) values (intraclass correlation coefficients=0.42 and 0.33 for Day 1 and Day 30, respectively). Prostatic edema at Day 1 had the largest effect on the Day 1 D(90) (p < 0.01). The factor significantly affecting the Day 30 D(90) was neoadjuvant hormone therapy (p < 0.01). The mean Day 30 D(90) for the hormone-treated patients was 117.9%, compared with 124.6% for those who remained hormone naïve. The intraoperative and postimplant dosimetric values differed significantly for the urethra and rectum.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that there are no significant differences between the D(90) assessments obtained intraoperatively and at Day 30 postoperatively. Furthermore, there are no definite correlations between intra- and postimplantation dosimetric values. Other D(90) values differed significantly between the intraoperative and postimplant dosimetry. This study suggests that dosimetry has negligible clinical utility for informing patients, at discharge, of whether or not their implants are adequate.

Rectal Morbidity Following I-125 Prostate Brachytherapy in Relation to Dosimetry

BACKGROUND

To investigate rectal morbidity after I-125 prostate brachytherapy and to analyze predictive factors of rectal morbidity.

METHODS

A group of 227 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with I-125 prostate brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) between September 2003 and January 2005. Rectal morbidity (diarrhea, bleeding and pain) was evaluated using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria. Dosimetry was based on computerized tomography (CT) scan 1 month post-implant. The clinical, treatment-related and dosimetric factors were evaluated for the risk of grade 2 rectal morbidity. Rectal dosimetric factors included the rectal volume that received >100% and 150% of the prescribed dose, and the maximal rectal dose which was defined as the sum of the minimal dose received by 1% of the rectum volume and the prescribed dose of EBRT.

RESULTS

Grade 2 rectal bleeding occurred in 10 (4.4%): for nine patients within the first year and for one patient between the first and second year. Grade 2 diarrhea occurred in one patient (0.4%) within the first year. No patient reported grade 2 pain. In the univariate analysis with grade 2 rectal bleeding, there were significant correlations with number of seeds, supplemental EBRT, and all of the rectal dosimetric parameters. On subsequent multivariate analysis, the only significant factor was the maximal rectal dose (P < 0.001). Rectal dose > 160 Gy was correlated to grade 2 rectal morbidity. All the patients with rectal dose > 160 Gy received EBRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Manifestations of rectal morbidity are acceptable events after I-125 prostate brachytherapy. Rectal dose-volume histogram for the brachytherapy is a predictive method for assessing the risk of developing grade 2 rectal bleeding. Delivery of the rectal dose should not exceed 160 Gy in order to avoid rectal complications.

Serial changes of international prostate symptom score following I-125 prostate brachytherapy

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to assess serial changes in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) within the first 12 months after iodine-125 (I-125) prostate brachytherapy.

METHODS

Between September 2003 and June 2004, a group of 103 patients with localized prostate cancer was treated with I-125 prostate brachytherapy, either alone (monotherapy; 60 patients) or in combination with external-beam radiotherapy (combined therapy; 43 patients). The IPSS was obtained at preimplant, and at 1, 6, and 12 months after treatment. The minimum IPSS follow-up for this study was 12 months. Dosimetry was based on computed tomography (CT) scan 1 month postimplant. Clinical, treatment-related, and dosimetric factors were assessed for correlations with the maximum IPSS increase (the peak IPSS minus the preimplant IPSS).

RESULTS

The median preimplant IPSS was 7.0, with a median peak of 16 at 1 month. The IPSS returned to baseline in 42 patients (40.8%) and it returned to within 3 points of the baseline in 64 (62.1%) at 1-year follow-up. On univariate and multivariate analyses, the maximum IPSS increase was best predicted by lower preimplant IPSS, in both the monotherapy and combined therapy groups.

CONCLUSION

In our series, IPSS after prostate brachytherapy peaked at 1 month and gradually returned to approximately baseline at 12 months.

Treatment of intermediate-risk prostate cancer with brachytherapy without supplemental pelvic radiotherapy: A review of the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center experience

PURPOSE

To determine the biochemical outcomes of patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center with an I-125 permanent seed implant without supplemental pelvic radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Under an institutional review board approved protocol, the charts of 88 patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer and a minimum follow-up of 36 months treated with brachytherapy without supplemental pelvic radiotherapy were reviewed. Median follow-up for the whole cohort was 57 months (range 37-121). Biochemical failure was defined using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition.

RESULTS

The 5-year biochemical failure-free survival for the cohort was 83%. Patients with perineural invasion had a worse biochemical outcome, which was statistically significant (perineural invasion vs. no perineural invasion, 5-year biochemical failure-free survival 64% vs. 89%, P = 0.004). None of the following factors were found significant in this subset of patients: Gleason scores 6 versus 7, primary Gleason grades 3 versus 4, percentage of core positive <20% versus >20%, number of cores positive <2 versus 2 versus >2, hormonal therapy versus no hormonal therapy, T1 versus T2, prostate-specific antigen <10 versus >10, or > or =2 intermediate risk factors versus 1 intermediate risk factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer may be treated effectively with brachytherapy without supplemental pelvic radiotherapy. However, because of the limited nature of our study, we cannot exclude that patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer may benefit from supplemental external beam radiotherapy.

Early biochemical outcomes following permanent interstitial brachytherapy as monotherapy in 1050 patients with clinical T1–T2 prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Five European centres (France, Finland, Italy, Spain and the UK) have pooled data to generate a large patient series involving 1175 patients treated with prostate brachytherapy. This paper reports preliminary data on PSA outcome up to 4 years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Out of 1175 in the database, 1050 patients with localised prostate cancer who had received transperineal seed implantation as monotherapy between May 1998 and August 2003 were stage T1-T2. A total of 668 (63.6%) patients met the low-risk group definition, 297 (28.3%) as intermediate-risk definition and 66 (6.3%) the high-risk group definition. The majority of patients were Gleason score 6 or less (n=951) and disease stage was T1c in 557 patients.

RESULTS

Of the 1050 patients, PSA data up to 4 years were available for 210 patients, while 364 patients with PSA values up to 36 months were evaluable by the Kaplan-Meier method for freedom from biochemical failure. The biochemical progression-free rate at 3 years was estimated to be 91%, with a 93% and 88% rate for low- and intermediate-risk groups, respectively, versus 80% for the high-risk group. PSA kinetics provide encouraging evidence of treatment efficacy.

CONCLUSION

These data on 4-year PSA follow-up on patients treated with prostate brachytherapy reflect those previously reported in the literature. This patient series will be followed to provide long-term outcome in the future.

Iodine seed prostate brachytherapy: an alternative first-line choice for early prostate cancer

This article on permanent iodine-125 seed prostate brachytherapy reviews the techniques, results, and patient selection issues for early prostate cancer. The long-term 10 y results of brachytherapy from Seattle, and their reproducibility in other centres both in the USA and UK are reported. The use of hormone therapy in brachytherapy and the value of combining external beam radiotherapy with a brachytherapy implant are discussed. Reviewed comparative data show the similarity of biochemical survival in patients treated with brachytherapy, radical prostatectomy, and external beam radiotherapy. The role of brachytherapy as a first-line treatment option for patients with prostate cancer is demonstrated.

Dose escalation in permanent brachytherapy for prostate cancer: dosimetric and biological considerations

No prospective dose escalation study for prostate brachytherapy (PB) with permanent implants has been reported. In this work, we have performed a dosimetric and biological analysis to explore the implications of dose escalation in PB using 125I and 103Pd implants. The concept of equivalent uniform dose (EUD), proposed originally for external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT), is applied to low dose rate brachytherapy. For a given 125I or 103Pd PB, the EUD for tumour that corresponds to a dose distribution delivered by EBRT is calculated based on the linear quadratic model. The EUD calculation is based on the dose volume histogram (DVH) obtained retrospectively from representative actual patient data. Tumour control probabilities (TCPs) are also determined in order to compare the relative effectiveness of different dose levels. The EUD for normal tissue is computed using the Lyman model. A commercial inverse treatment planning algorithm is used to investigate the feasibility of escalating the dose to prostate with acceptable dose increases in the rectum and urethra. The dosimetric calculation is performed for five representative patients with different prostate sizes. A series of PB dose levels are considered for each patient using 125I and 103Pd seeds. It is found that the PB prescribed doses (minimum peripheral dose) that give an equivalent EBRT dose of 64.8, 70.2, 75.6 and 81 Gy with a fraction size of 1.8 Gy are 129, 139, 150 and 161 Gy for 125I and 103, 112, 122 and 132 Gy for 103Pd implants, respectively. Estimates of the EUD and TCP for a series of possible prescribed dose levels (e.g., 145, 160, 170 and 180 Gy for 125I and 125, 135, 145 and 155 for 103Pd implants) are tabulated. The EUD calculation was found to depend strongly on DVHs and radiobiological parameters. The dosimetric calculations suggest that the dose to prostate can be escalated without a substantial increase in both rectal and urethral dose. For example, increasing the PB prescribed dose from 145 to 180 Gy increases EUD for the rectum by only 3%. Our studies indicate that the dose to urethra can be kept within 100-120% of the prescription dose for all the dose levels studied. In conclusion, dose escalation in permanent implant for localized prostate cancer may be advantageous. It is dosimetrically possible to increase dose to prostate without a substantial increase in the dose to the rectum and urethra. Based on the results of our studies, a prospective dose escalation trial for prostate permanent implants has been initiated at our institution.

Four-year biochemical outcome after radioimmunoguided transperineal brachytherapy for patients with prostate adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate 4-year biochemical outcomes for patients with prostate adenocarcinoma who underwent radioimmunoguided (Prostascint) permanent prostate brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eighty patients with clinical T1C-T3A NxM0 prostate cancer underwent ProstaScint-guided prostate brachytherapy using either (103)Pd or (125)I between February 1997 and December 2000. Sixty-seven patients underwent prostate brachytherapy alone, whereas 13 patients received neoadjuvant hormonal manipulation before implantation. Risk factors (RF) included PSA >10, Stage >or=T2b, and Gleason grade >or=7. Sixty patients had low-risk disease (0 RF), 17 were intermediate risk (1 RF), and 3 were high risk (2 RF). Biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) was calculated using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) consensus criteria, a PSA cutoff of 1.0 ng/mL, and a PSA cutoff of 0.5 ng/mL.

RESULTS

Four-year bDFS for the entire cohort was 97.4% using the ASTRO consensus criteria. Low-risk patients (60) had a 4-year bDFS of 100%; intermediate- and high-risk patients (20 patients) were 89.2%. The hormonally naïve group (67 patients) had a 4-year bDFS of 96.9% and a median PSA nadir of 0.2 ng/mL. Median time to nadir was 19.8 months (range: 1.9-53.2 months). For the neoadjuvant hormonal therapy group (13 patients), ASTRO-defined bDFS was 100%. Overall, 85.2% of patients had a posttreatment PSA <or=1.0 ng/mL, and 75.9% had a PSA <or=0.5 ng/mL at a median follow-up of 36 months.

CONCLUSIONS

At a median follow-up of 36 months, ProstaScint-guided transperineal brachytherapy results in a high probability of actuarial 4-year biochemical disease-free survival for patients with localized prostate cancer.

Brachytherapy: update and results

Prostate cancer is the most common noncutaneous malignancy and the second most common cause of cancer mortality in American men. Treatment options for these patients include radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, hormonal therapy, and prostate brachytherapy. Patients with clinically and radiographically localized disease, especially young patients with few comorbid illnesses, are good candidates for prostate brachytherapy. Prostate brachytherapy has gained widespread acceptance throughout the past two decades and data from several large series of patients are now available. This article describes current techniques, treatment issues, and clinical results of permanent seed implants.