Conformal radiotherapy optimization with micromultileaf collimators: comparison with radiosurgery techniques

OPTIMUM TREATMENT MODE APPLIED TO POST-OPERATIVE CERVICAL CANCER FOR 5F-IMRT PLAN BASED ON FOUR VARIABLES IN VARIAN ECLIPSE TPS

Purpose: This study aimed to determine the dosimetric effect on the target volume, organs at risk (OARs) and normal tissues based on the different choice for four types of mechanical variables, i.e., treatment position, dose calculation algorithm, mulitleaf collimator (MLC) motion mode and X-ray energy; and to investigate the optimum treatment mode applied to post-operative cervical cancer for 5-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (5F-IMRT) technique. Methods: The dosimetric difference on the target volume and OARs under the influence of four types of variables were initially compared by changing one variable at a time. Then, based on the above compared results, we compared the dosimetric difference on planning target volume (PTV) and OARs between group A composed of the superior four variables and group B composed of the relatively inferior four variables. The dosimetric parameters included dose distribution of the target volume, OARs and normal tissues, conformal index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), monitor units (MU) and beam-on time ([Formula: see text]. The independent and paired t-tests were used for statistical analysis, and the threshold for statistical significance was [Formula: see text]. Results: Compared with the supine position, the maximum dose of PTV ([Formula: see text]), the maximum dose of small intestine ([Formula: see text]) and [Formula: see text] of bladder ([Formula: see text] were all lower in prone position. In contrast with the pencil beam convolution (PBC), CI of PTV (CI[Formula: see text]) was larger while HI of PTV (HI[Formula: see text]) was lower, both [Formula: see text] and the maximum dose of rectum ([Formula: see text]) were lower using anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA). Moreover, the same results were obtained using sliding window (SW) compared with multiple static segments (MSS). The mean dose of PTV ([Formula: see text] and CI[Formula: see text] was larger while the maximum dose of the spinal cord ([Formula: see text]), [Formula: see text] and the maximum dose of femoral heads were lower with 15 MV X-rays compared with 6 MV X-rays. In comparison with group B comprising the supine position, PBC, MSS and 6 MV X-rays, [Formula: see text] and HI[Formula: see text] decreased 1.4% and 53.4% respectively, CI[Formula: see text] increased 5.8% medially, while [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] all decreased in group A comprising of prone position, AAA, SW and 15 MV X-rays. Conclusion: The treatment mode composed of prone position, AAA algorithm, SW and 15 MV X-rays is chosen for the post-operative cervical cancer of 5F-IMRT technique, which is more capable of meeting the target volume constraints and maximal protection of OARs.

A contemporary review of stereotactic radiotherapy: inherent dosimetric complexities and the potential for detriment

OBJECTIVE

The advantages of highly localised, conformal treatments achievable with stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) are increasingly being extended to extracranial sites as stereotactic body radiotherapy with advancements in imaging and beam collimation. One of the challenges in stereotactic treatment lies in the significant complexities associated with small field dosimetry and dose calculation. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the complexities associated with stereotactic radiotherapy and the potential for detriment.

METHODS

This study is based on a comprehensive review of literature accessible via PubMed and other sources, covering stereotactic radiotherapy, small-field dosimetry and dose calculation.

FINDINGS

Several key issues were identified in the literature. They pertain to dose prescription, dose measurement and dose calculation within and beyond the treatment field. Field-edge regions and penumbrae occupy a significant portion of the total field size. Spectral and dosimetric characteristics are difficult to determine and are compounded by effects of tissue inhomogeneity. Measurement of small-fields is made difficult by detector volume averaging and energy response. Available dosimeters are compared, and emphasis is given to gel dosimetry which offers the greatest potential for three-dimensional small-field dosimetry. The limitations of treatment planning system algorithms as applied to small-fields (particularly in the presence of heterogeneities) is explained, and a review of Monte Carlo dose calculation is provided, including simplified treatment planning implementations. Not incorporated into treatment planning, there is evidence that far from the primary field, doses to patients (and corresponding risks of radiocarcinogenesis) from leakage/scatter in SRT are similar to large fields.

CONCLUSIONS

Improved knowledge of dosimetric issues is essential to the accurate measurement and calculation of dose as well as the interpretation and assessment of planned and delivered treatments. This review highlights such issues and the potential benefit that may be gained from Monte Carlo dose calculation and verification via three-dimensional dosimetric methods (such as gel dosimetry) being introduced into routine clinical practice.

Dosimetric characteristics of dual-layer multileaf collimation for small-field and intensity-modulated radiation therapy applications

The purpose of the present work was to measure the performance characteristics in the penumbra region and on the leaf‐end of an innovative dual‐layer micro multileaf collimator (DmMLC). The DmMLC consists of two orthogonal (upper and lower) layers of leaves; a standard MLC consists of one layer. The DmMLC provides unique performance characteristics in smoothing dose undulation, reducing leaf‐end transmission, and reducing MLC field dependence of the leaf stepping angle. Two standard MLCs (80‐leaf and 120‐leaf versions: Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA), a DmMLC (AccuKnife: Initia Medical Technology, Canton, MA), and a Cerrobend (Cerro Metal Products, Bellefonte, PA) block were used in performance studies involving a triangular field, a cross leaf‐end field, and a circular field. Measurements were made with 6‐MV X‐rays and extended dose range film at a depth of 5 cm in Solid Water (Gammex rmi, Middleton, WI) at a source–axis distance of 100 cm. The field penumbra width measured between the 20% and 80% isodose lines through the MLC‐80, MLC‐120, DmMLC, and Cerrobend block were 9.0, 5.0, 3.0, and 2.0 mm respectively. The dose undulation amplitude of the 50% isodose line was measured as 5.5, 2.0, and 0.5 mm for the MLC‐80, MLC‐120, and DmMLC respectively. The planar dose difference between the MLC‐80, MLC‐120, and DmMLC against Cerrobend block was measured as ranging at ±52.5%,±35.0%, and ±20.0% respectively. The leaf‐end transmission was measured at 22.4% in maximum and 15.4% in average when closing a single layer of the DmMLC, and at 2.4% in maximum and 2.1% in average when closing both layers. The MLC dependence of the leaf stepping angle with the DmMLC ranged from 45 degrees to 90 degrees. The standard MLC leaf stepping angle ranged from 0 degrees to 90 degrees. In conclusion, the dose undulation, leaf‐end transmission, and MLC field dependence of the leaf stepping angle with the DmMLC were remarkably reduced as compared with those of the standard MLCs. And as compared with Cerrobend block, the DmMLC provided very comparable performance in field‐edge smoothing and in the shaping of complex fields.

PACS numbers: 87.56.Jk, 87.56.Nk, 87.56.Nj, 87.57.Nt

Does Intensity Modulation Improve Healthy Tissue Sparing in Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Complex Arteriovenous Malformations?

This planning study evaluates the potential of intensity modulated treatment fields and inverse planning techniques in stereotactic radiosurgery to reduce healthy tissue dose. Twenty patients previously treated with stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformation (AVM) were replanned with each of 4 techniques: circular non-coplanar arcs, dynamic arcs, static conformal fields, and intensity modulated radiosurgery (IMRS). Patients were selected having a maximum AVM dimension at least 20 mm, or volume greater than 10 cm(3). Target volumes ranged from 2.12 cm(3) to 13.87 cm(3) with a median of 6.03 cm(3). Resulting dose distributions show a statistically significant improvement in target conformality between circular arcs and all other techniques (p </= 0.001), between conformal and both dynamic arcs and IMRS (p </= 0.03) and with no difference between dynamic arcs and IMRS. However, for AVMs of volume greater than 5.5 cm(3), IMRS gives better conformality than dynamic arcs (p = 0.04). IMRS showed consistently lower dose inhomogeneity compared to both dynamic arcs and conformal fields (p < 0.001). At low dose levels, the dynamic arc technique irradiates less healthy tissue than the other techniques (p </= 0.001). Both dynamic arcs and IMRS provide increased ability to conform to the AVM, with IMRS showing greater ability to control dose at the periphery.

Intensity-modulated radiosurgery for childhood arteriovenous malformations

PURPOSE

Presentation of intensity-modulated radiosurgery (IMRS) for the treatment of inoperable, complex shaped pediatric arterio-venous malformations AVM.

METHOD

Between 03/99 and 11/04, IMRS was delivered to seven children aged six to 18 years. Prescribed minimum doses ranged from 17.5 to 20 Gy (median 18 Gy). Radiosurgery planning and delivery used a serial tomotherapeutic IMRT technique (Peacock IMRT, North American Scientific/Nomos, Cranberry Township, PA) over two to four couch angles. A linear accelerator attached binary multi-leaf collimator was used to generate pencil beams of 10 mm by either 8.5 or 4.0 mm. Treatment planning employed an inverse treatment planning optimization algorithm. Parameters submitted to the treatment planning system were: prescription dose (PD), volume of target allowed to receive less dose (standard 3%), minimum dose (0.5 Gy less than PD), and maximum dose (200% of PD). Planning system specific IMRS target and tissue types were selected to prioritize dose conformality over dose homogeneity. The prescription isodose encompassed at least 95% of the target volume. We calculated conformality (CI) and homogeneity indices (HI) to characterize the quality of IMRS plans, and summarized preliminary clinical outcomes.

FINDINGS

Target volumes ranged from 0.71 to 63.02 cm(3) (median 13.8 cm(3), 6/7 AVM larger than 10 cm(3)). Median CI was 1.07 (range 1.05 to 1.7) according to RTOG criteria. Median HI was 1.12 (range 1.09 to 1.23). During limited follow-up (median 32 months, range 5 to 53 months), two AVM completely obliterated at 19 and 22 months, and partial obliteration (>75%) was observed in three cases. No treatment-related side effects, other than acute nausea and temporary headaches interpreted as being associated with changes in cerebral blood distribution, were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

IMRS can allow for highly conformal planning and delivery of radiosurgery radiation doses even if pediatric AVM target volumes are large and/or highly complex in shape. This technique has been seen to result in favorable preliminary outcomes, thus supporting future exploration of this technique in pediatric and adult patients.

Stereotactic arc therapy for small elongated tumors using cones and collimator jaws; dosimetric and planning aspects

Stereotactic arc treatment of small intracranial tumors is usually performed with arcs collimated by circular cones, resulting in treatment volumes which are basically spherical. For nonspherical lesions this results in a suboptimal dose distribution. Multiple isocenters may improve the dose conformity for these lesions, at the cost of large overdosages in the target volume. To achieve improved dose conformity as well as dose homogeneity, the linac jaws (with a minimum distance of 1.0 cm to the central beam axis) can routinely be used to block part of the circular beams. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of blocking cones with diameters as small as 1.0 cm and a minimum distance between the jaw and the central beam axis of 0.3 cm. First, the reproducibility in jaw positioning and resulting dose delivery on the treatment unit were assessed. Second, the accuracy of the TPS dose calculation for these small fields was established. Finally, clinically applied treatment plans using nonblocked cones were compared with plans using the partially blocked cones for several treatment sites. The reproducibility in dose delivery on our Varian Clinac 2300 C/D machines on the central beam axis is 0.8% (1 SD). The accuracy of the treatment planning system dose calculation algorithm is critically dependent on the used fits for the penumbra and the phantom scatter. The average deviation of calculated from measured dose on the central beam axis is -1.0%+/-1.4% (1 SD), which is clinically acceptable. Partial cone blocking results in improved dose distributions for elongated tumors, such as vestibular schwannoma and uveal melanoma. Multiple isocenters may be avoided. The technique is easy to implement and requires no additional workload.

Dose conformation of intensity-modulated stereotactic photon beams, proton beams, and intensity-modulated proton beams for intracranial lesions

PURPOSE

This study evaluates photon beam intensity-modulated stereotactic radiotherapy (IMSRT) based on dynamic leaf motion of a micromultileaf collimator (mMLC), proton beams, and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) with respect to target coverage and organs at risk.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Dose plans of 6 stereotactically treated patients were recalculated for IMSRT by use of the same field setup and an inverse planning algorithm. Proton and IMPT plans were calculated anew. Three different tumor shapes, multifocal, ovoid, and irregular, were analyzed, as well as dose to organs-at-risk (OAR) in the vicinity of the planning target volume (PTV). Dose distributions were calculated from beam-setup data for a manual mMLC for stereotactically guided conformal radiotherapy (SCRT), a dynamic mMLC for IMSRT, the spot-scanning technique for protons, and a modified spot-scanning technique for IMPT. SCRT was included for a part of the comparison. Criteria for assessment were PTV coverage, dose-volume histograms (DVH), volumes of specific isodoses, and the dose to OAR.

RESULTS

Dose conformation to the PTV is equally good for all three techniques and tumor shapes considered. The volumes of the 90% and 80% isodose were comparable for all techniques. For the 50% isodose volume, a divergence between the two modes was seen. In 3 cases, this volume is smaller for IMSRT, and in the 3 other cases, it is smaller for IMPT. This difference was even more pronounced for the volumes of the 30% isodose; IMPT shows further improvement over conventional protons. OAR in concavities (e.g., the brainstem) were similarly well spared by protons and IMSRT. IMPT spares critical organs best. Fewer proton beams are required to achieve similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of intensity modulation improves the conformality of mMLC-based SCRT. Conformation of dose to the PTV is comparable for IMSRT, protons, and IMPT. Concerning the sparing of OAR, IMSRT is equivalent to IMPT, and IMPT is superior to conventional protons. The advantage of protons lies in the lower integral dose.

Stereotactic radiotherapy for treatment of cavernous sinus meningiomas

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) using a linear accelerator equipped with a micromultileaf collimator for cavernous sinus meningiomas.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty-five patients with benign cavernous sinus meningiomas were treated with SRT between November 1997 and April 2002. Sixteen patients received definitive treatment on the basis of imaging characteristics of the cavernous sinus tumor. Twenty-nine patients received SRT either as immediate adjuvant treatment after incomplete resection or at documented recurrence. Treatment planning in all patients included CT-MRI image fusion and beam shaping using a micromultileaf collimator. The primary tumor volume varied from 1.41 to 65.66 cm(3) (median, 14.5 cm(3)). The tumor diameter varied from 1.4 to 7.4 cm (median, 3.8 cm). Tumor compressed the optic chiasm or optic nerve in 30 patients. All tumors were treated with a single isocenter plus a margin of normal parenchyma varying from 1 to 5 mm (median, 2.5 mm). The prescribed dose varied from 4250 to 5400 cGy (median, 5040 cGy). The prescription isodose varied from 87% to 95% (median, 90%). The maximal tumor dose varied from 5000 to 6000 cGy (median, 5600 cGy). The follow-up varied from 12 to 53 months (median, 36 months).

RESULTS

The actuarial 3-year overall and progression-free survival rate was 100% and 97.4%, respectively. One patient (2%) developed local relapsed at 18 months. A partial imaging response occurred in 18% of patients, and the tumor was stable in the remaining 80%. Preexisting neurologic complaints improved in 20% of patients and were stable in the remainder. No patient, tumor, or treatment factors were found to be predictive of imaging or clinical response. Transient acute morbidities included headache responsive to nonnarcotic analgesics in 4 patients, fatigue in 3 patients, and retroorbital pain in 1 patient. No treatment-induced peritumoral edema, cranial neuropathy, endocrine dysfunction, cognitive decline, or second malignancy occurred. One patient had an ipsilateral cerebrovascular accident 6 months after SRT.

CONCLUSION

Stereotactic radiotherapy is both safe and effective for patients with cavernous sinus meningiomas. Field shaping using a micromultileaf collimator allows conformal and homogeneous radiation of cavernous sinus meningiomas that may not be amenable to single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery because of tumor size or location. Additional clinical experience is necessary to determine the position of SRT among the available innovative fractionated RT options for challenging skull base meningiomas.

Dosimetric Comparison of CyberKnife with Other Radiosurgical Modalities for an Ellipsoidal Target

OBJECTIVE

To compare treatment plans obtained with the CyberKnife (CK) (Accuray, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) with those of other commonly used radiosurgical modalities, such as the gamma knife (GK), linear accelerator multiple arcs, conformally shaped static fields, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

METHODS

An ellipsoidal simulated target was chosen centrally located in a three-dimensional model of a patient's head acquired with magnetic resonance or computed tomographic imaging. It was 25 mm in diameter and 35 mm long. The aims of treatment plans were 100% target volume coverage with an appropriate isodose line, minimum radiation dose to normal tissue, and clinically acceptable delivery. These plans were evaluated by use of a dose-volume histogram and other commonly used radiosurgical parameters such as target coverage, homogeneity index, and conformity index.

RESULTS

All selected treatment modalities were equivalent in providing full target coverage. For dose homogeneity, all modalities except for multiple isocenter plans for GK (homogeneity index, 2.0) were similar (homogeneity index, ≅1.25). Dose conformity was essentially equivalent for all treatment plans except for IMRT, which had a slightly higher value (conformity index, ≅1.27). There was a substantial variation in the radiation dose to normal tissue between the studied modalities, particularly at the lower dose levels.

CONCLUSION

CK plans seemed to be more flexible for a given target size and shape. For a target of limited volume and essentially of any shape, one could obtain similarly good conformal dosimetry with CK and GK. For a regular-shaped but other than spherical target, homogeneous dose distribution could be obtained with all selected modalities except for multiple isocenters, linear accelerator multiple arcs, or GK. Both IMRT and conformally shaped static fields offered good alternative treatment modalities to CK, GK, or linear accelerator multiple arc radiosurgery, with slightly inferior dosimetry in conformity (IMRT).

Intensity-modulated stereotactic radiotherapy vs. stereotactic conformal radiotherapy for the treatment of meningioma located predominantly in the skull base

PURPOSE

This study evaluates a possible advantage of intensity-modulated stereotactic radiotherapy (IMSRT) over stereotactic conformal radiotherapy (SCRT) in the treatment of lesions in the base of the skull.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ten patients (7 with a skull base meningioma) planned for routine SCRT were replanned for IMSRT. The criteria for comparison were the same for both methods: optimal dose to the planning target volume (PTV) and optimal sparing of the organs at risk (OAR). For SCRT, sparing of OAR was achieved by conformal avoidance using 5-6 fields. The IMSRT inverse planning process used optimized OAR sparing through user-defined dose constraints. Dose to the PTV and OAR were assessed by dose-volume histograms, maximum dose, 2 conformity indices, and volumes of relevant isodoses.

RESULTS

The conformity index is consistently higher for IMSRT, the largest improvement being for the multifocal and irregular cases. Volumes of the 90% and 80% isodoses were smaller for IMSRT, whereas the volume of the 30% isodose was larger for IMSRT in 6 cases. The maximum dose was consistently higher for IMSRT (mean values 102% and 108% for SCRT and IMSRT, respectively). Sparing of OAR was better with IMSRT, especially for those OARs situated in or near a concave PTV.

CONCLUSIONS

In terms of PTV coverage, there is an advantage in using IMSRT for all target shapes, but especially for irregular and concave targets. The dose to OAR is lower with IMSRT, although the volume of normal tissue receiving a low dose can be larger than for SCRT.

Treatment planning for stereotactic radiosurgery with photon beams

Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) has evolved as a unique discipline that combines aspects of both surgery and radiation oncology. Technological developments in the past few decades have provided a wide array of treatment techniques, including (i) the Gamma Knife; (ii) Linac-based stereotactic techniques using circular collimators or using micro multileaf collimators (mMLCs); (iii) the Cyber Knife, using an x-band linac mounted on a robotic arm; and (iv) serial and spiral tomotherapy. This paper provides a review of the treatment planning methods for stereotactic radiosurgery. Because of the differences in planning strategies used for each SRS technique, this paper will provide both a general review of the pre-requisites and common features of SRS treatment planning and the planning techniques specific to each of the SRS techniques.

Gentlemen (and ladies), choose your weapons: Gamma knife vs. linear accelerator radiosurgery

This article compares and contrasts Gamma Knife radiosurgery with linear accelerator-based radiosurgery; where appropriate, Cyberknife technology is discussed. Topics covered are: positioning of the head (invasive versus non-invasive positioning systems); collimator construction; beam properties; beam arrangements; treatment planning; and issues regarding manpower (including a discussion of patient repositioning during treatment), machine availability, and financial considerations.