Hyperfractionated radiotherapy and paclitaxel for locally advanced/unresectable pancreatic cancer

Association of radiotherapy with favorable prognosis in daily clinical practice for treatment of locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Radiotherapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy is currently used in definitive therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer. We sought to evaluate the prognostic significance, pattern of care, and use of RT in locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Between 2002 and 2011, patients with invasive pancreatic carcinoma and prior exposure to systemic chemotherapy were included. We used Cox regression model and propensity score matching for prognostic analyses and logistic regression for analyzing the factors impacting the use of RT.

RESULTS

We identified 217 pancreatic cancer patients (74 with unresectable stage II or III and 143 with stage IV). Of all patients, 90.8% had adenocarcinoma, and only 19.2% (42/217) received RT with doses ranging from 50 to 55 Gy in 25 to 28 fractions using modern RT techniques. Logistic regression showed stage (P < 0.001) and initial CA 19-9 level (P = 0.026) were significantly predictive of the choice of RT as a first-line treatment, whereas the second-line use of RT was associated with the response to first-line chemotherapy and longer progression-free survival. Patients with RT had a better median survival than those without it (14.6 vs 8.1 months, P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis and propensity score matching, RT remained a good prognostic factor for overall survival.

CONCLUSION

The use of RT might be associated with a favorable clinical outcome in patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer. Further exploration of RT as a first-line therapy or second-line therapy for locally advanced or even metastatic pancreatic cancer is warranted.

Radiation dose responses for chemoradiation therapy of pancreatic cancer: an analysis of compiled clinical data using biophysical models

PURPOSE

We analyzed recent clinical data obtained from chemoradiation of unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) in order to examine possible benefits from radiation therapy dose escalation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A modified linear quadratic model was used to fit clinical tumor response and survival data of chemoradiation treatments for LAPC reported from 20 institutions. Biophysical radiosensitivity parameters were extracted from the fits.

RESULTS

Examination of the clinical data demonstrated an enhancement in tumor response with higher irradiation dose, an important clinical result for palliation and quality of life. Little indication of improvement in 1-year survival with increased radiation dose was observed. Possible dose escalation schemes are proposed based on calculations of the biologically effective dose required for a 50% tumor response rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the evaluation of tumor response data, the escalation of radiation dose presents potential clinical benefits which when combined with normal tissue complication analyses may result in improved treatment outcome for locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients.

Local recurrence of pancreatic cancer after primary surgical intervention: how to deal with this devastating scenario?

The dismal prognosis of pancreatic cancer reflects into the increased recurrence rate, even after R0 pancreaticoduodenectomy. Although, conventional radiation-, chemo- or surgical therapy in much selected cases, seem to work out favorably long term, less invasive and non-toxic methods with more immediate results are always preferred, concerning the already aggravated status of this group of patients. We present hereby a comprehensive review of the literature concerning the treatment of recurrent pancreatic cancer based on the case of a patient who 20 months after a pancreaticoduodenectomy developed portal hypertension and symptomatic first degree esophageal, gastric and mesenteric varices, caused by the nearly complete splenic vein obstruction at the portal vein confluence. The varices were revascularized by a percutaneous transhepatic placement of an endovascular stent into the splenic vein, along with a sequent stereotactic body radiation therapy for the local tumor control. Thanks to the accuracy and safety of the present combined treatment, the patient one year later presents control of the disease and its complications. Our paper is the first in the international literature that tries to review all the treatment modalities available (surgical, adjuvant, neoadjuvant and palliative therapy) and their efficacy, concerning the locally recurrent pancreatic cancer; furthermore, we tried to analyze the application of the above mentioned combined therapeutic approach in similar cases, elucidating simultaneously all the questions that arise. The limited existing data in the international literature and the lack of randomized controlled trials make this effort difficult, but the physician should be aware after all of all the available and innovative treatment modalities, before he chooses one. Finally, we would like to emphasize the fact that not only the local control but also the management of the complications are important for a prolonged median survival and a better quality of life after all.

Phase II study of oral S-1 and concurrent radiotherapy in patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

S-1 is an oral fluoropyrimidine derivative that has demonstrated favorable antitumor activity in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of S-1 and concurrent radiotherapy in patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with histopathologically proven, unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic cancer were eligible. Radiotherapy was delivered in 1.8 Gy daily fractions to a total dose of 50.4 Gy over 5.5 weeks. S-1 was administered orally twice a day at a dose of 80 mg/m(2)/day from day 1 to 14 and 22 to 35. Two weeks after the completion of chemoradiotherapy, maintenance chemotherapy with S-1 was administered for 28 days every 6 weeks until progression.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were enrolled in this study. The most common Grade 3 toxicities during chemoradiotherapy were anorexia (24%) and nausea (12%). The overall response rate was 41% (95% confidence interval, 25%-58%) and overall disease control rate (partial response plus stable disease) was 97%. More than 50% decrease in serum CA 19-9 was seen in 27 of 29 evaluable patients (93%). The median progression-free survival was 8.7 months. The median overall survival and 1-year survival rate were 16.8 months and 70.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral S-1 and concurrent radiotherapy exerted a promising antitumor activity with acceptable toxicity in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. This combination therapy seems to be an attractive alternative to conventional chemoradiotherapy using 5-fluorouracil infusion.

Results of a phase I trial of 12 patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma combining gefitinib, paclitaxel, and 3-dimensional conformal radiation: report of toxicity and evaluation of circulating K-ras as a potential biomarker of response to therapy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the toxicity of daily gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, with concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) in patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma and prospectively evaluate plasma k-ras as a potential marker of response to gefitinib and CRT.

METHODS

Eleven of 12 eligible patients enrolled received a 7-day induction of gefitinib (250 mg PO) followed by daily gefitinib with concurrent CRT. Patients received 50.4 Gy/28 fractions of external beam radiation with weekly paclitaxel (40 mg/m IV) followed by maintenance on gefitinib. Plasma k-ras codon 12 mutations were detected using a two-stage restriction fragment length polymorphism-polymerase chain reaction assay on patients' plasma both before and after therapy. Mutations were confirmed by direct sequencing.

RESULTS

Common adverse events included grade 1 skin rash (63%), grade 1 to 2 gastrointestinal symptoms including anorexia, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea occurred in 63% of patients, grade 3 nausea occurred in 45% of patients. Three patients did not complete therapy, only one was possibly associated with study drug. K-ras mutations were detected in the pre-gefitinib plasma of 5/11 patients and in the matched tumor tissue of 3/4 patients. In patients where k-ras mutations were undetectable post-treatment, survival times were favorable.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of daily gefitinib with concurrent CRT in this locally advanced pancreatic cancer population was reasonably tolerated. Rapid changes in serum k-ras may provide critical information as to the efficacy of a novel agent and assist in tailoring treatment for cancers of the pancreas.

A dose-finding and pharmacodynamic study of bortezomib in combination with weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE

A phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of bortezomib (B) when combined with weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients received escalating doses of intravenous (IV) bortezomib (0.6-2 mg/m(2)) on days 2 and 9 and IV paclitaxel at 100 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Dose escalation was based on two end-points: not exceeding 80% 20S-proteasome inhibition (20-S PI) and the development of dose-limiting toxicity defined as grade 3 or greater non-hematologic or grade 4 hematologic toxicities.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients with advanced solid tumors and a median of 3 prior chemotherapy regimens (range 0-9), received 318 doses (median 5, range 1-34) of bortezomib and paclitaxel. Dose-related inhibition of 20-S PI was observed with a maximum inhibition of 70-80% at the MTD of 1.8 mg/m(2) of bortezomib. At the MTD (N = 9) the following toxicities were observed: grade 4 neutropenia without fever (n = 2) and cerebrovascular ischemia (n = 1); grade 3 neutropenia (n = 3), diarrhea (n = 2), nausea (n = 1), and fatigue (n = 1); grade 2 fatigue (n = 5), diarrhea (n = 4), and dyspnea (n = 2). There was one partial response in a patient with an eccrine porocarcinoma. Stabilization of disease was observed in 7 (16%) patients, 3 of whom had advanced pancreatic cancer.

CONCLUSION

Sequential paclitaxel and bortezomib in previously treated patients with advanced solid tumors resulted in acceptable toxicity and no evidence of interaction. The recommended phase II dose of bortezomib in combination with weekly paclitaxel was 1.8 mg/m(2).

Primary advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer

Median as well as overall survival of pancreatic cancer patients in the advanced stage is extremely low despite advances in cancer therapy regarding tumor cell biology, therapy resistance, and diagnosis. In matters of chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer, favorable positive effect has been reached with different radiotherapy proceedings such as intraoperative radiation therapy with or without external chemo-/radiation therapy or with CRT alone with regard to local tumor pain, local tumor remission, or local control of disease and overall survival. Primary (chemo-) radiation therapy only rarely leads to local remission. Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) merely reaches pain palliation in most cases. By administering up-to-date primary CRT, especially with gemcitabine-associated CRT, local remission in up to 50% of patients can be observed. By applying neoadjuvant CRT, better resectability and the reduction of postoperative positive lymph node metastasis has been seen in patients with resectable or possibly resectable pancreatic cancer. With primary CRT, resectability can also be achieved in patients with primary unresectable pancreatic cancer. It has been shown at the evaluation of patients' progression samples--either treated with neoadjuvant or primarily with radiotherapy (with conventional radiation technique)--that the rate of local recurrence or local progression can be reduced in comparison with historical cohorts. By contrast, the rate on distant metastases was not affected. Whereas concurrent CRT leads to favorable local tumor control, this procedure has a minor effect as to the survival in most of the studies. Because metastases occur mostly out of the irradiation field and because of partly advanced local tumor progression, the concept of combined CRT with continuing chemotherapy was developed. Median survival of pancreatic patients in the advanced stage is approx. 3-5 months, with a 12-month survival probability of 10% despite advances in cancer therapy. On the other hand, the 5-year survival probability is 0.4%-3.0%. The causes of such a dismal prognosis can be understood first of all in the commonly late diagnosis, second in the aggressive tumor cell biology with continuing therapy resistance, and finally because an acceptable resection rate can be achieved only in specialized centers. Only 10%-15% of patients can be resected after the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Resection is considered a potential curative therapy. However, median survival of these patients amounts to only 13-18 months, with a 5-year survival of 10%-20%. The survival rate did not improve with a radical resection and extended lymphadenectomy. Furthermore, 15%-30% of primary nonmetastatic pancreatic cancer is unresectable due to extended vessel infiltration at time of diagnosis. The prognosis for these patients is very dismal due to lack of specific therapy; moreover, median overall survival is a maximum of 6-8 months.

Locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a review

It is anticipated that there will be 37,170 new cases of pancreatic cancer diagnosed in the United States this year, resulting in approximately 33,370 deaths from the disease. Approximately 40% of these patients will present with locally advanced, non-metastatic disease. Treatment regimens that incorporate conventional radiation therapy for local tumor control, and chemotherapy to prevent distant failure in this metastasis-prone malignancy, are the current standard of care. A number of clinical studies have been undertaken to establish the optimal definitive chemoradiation treatment in this setting. Other potential treatment strategies include chemoradiation incorporating novel chemotherapeutic agents, intraoperative radiation therapy, brachytherapy, and the integration of combined therapies that utilize targeted molecular agents. This review summarizes the current status, controversies, and future prospects for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Rationale and appropriate use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

The emergence of effective systemic chemotherapy, along with the parallel development of new targeted cell signal inhibitors for pancreatic cancer treatment, has provided impetus for a re-examination of the appropriate use of chemotherapy and radiation therapy in this malignancy. In addition to exciting developments in the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic disease, new data have emerged regarding the efficacy of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy when combined with traditional surgical approaches such as a Whipple procedure. This review summarizes the sentinel clinical trials and discoveries that have influenced the development and deployment of scientifically based multidisciplinary care for today's patients, with a particular focus on modern radiation and chemotherapy.

Phase I/II trial of hyperfractionated accelerated chemoradiotherapy for unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

We conducted a Phase I/II study to evaluate the local efficacy and toxicity of hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (HART) combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin (CDDP) in patients with unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Thirty-five patients (15 with Stage 4A and 20 with Stage 4B disease according to TNM classification) were enrolled between August 1997 and August 2001 into this Phase I/II trial. All patients received concurrent HART (1.5 Gy twice daily separated by 6 h for 5 days per week), 5-FU (375 mg/m(2) given as continuous intravenous infusion), and CDDP (2 mg/m(2) given as 30-min infusion just before each fraction of irradiation). In the Phase I trial, the total dose of radiation was escalated from 27 to 45 Gy.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were enrolled in the Phase I study and six patients were given the final planned dose (45 Gy) which did not exceed the maximum tolerated dose. Eleven patients (52.4%) suffered from Grade 3 or worse neutropenia. Vomiting and mucositis were observed in 21 (100%) and 12 (57.1%) patients, respectively. An additional 14 patients were entered in the Phase II trial and received a total dose of 45 Gy, which is recommended in Phase I trial. Concerning the local tumor control of 20 patients with the recommended regimen, 7 patients (35%) achieved partial response, 10 (50%) remained stable and local progressive disease occurred in 3 (15%). The median survival time and the overall 1-year survival rate were 11.2 months and 40.0%, respectively, in 20 patients who received the recommended regimen. In Stage 4A patients, they were 13.0 months and 70.0%, respectively. The trend of toxicities in patients with the recommended regimen was almost the same as that observed in the Phase I study.

CONCLUSION

The chosen combined modality treatment was well tolerated, and showed an expected local efficacy for the treatment of unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer.

Docetaxel/Gemcitabine Followed by Gemcitabine and External Beam Radiotherapy in Patients With Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer remains highly lethal. Previous attempts with neoadjuvant therapy in this disease have been inconclusive, but a potential for benefit exists. We conducted a phase II trial of dose-intense docetaxel and gemcitabine followed by twice-weekly gemcitabine and external beam radiotherapy in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with stage I to III disease were eligible. Docetaxel 65 mg/m(2) intravenously over 1 hour and gemcitabine 4000 mg/m(2) given intravenously over 30 minutes were given on days 1, 15, and 29. On day 43, radiotherapy was begun at 50.4 Gy with gemcitabine 50 mg/m(2) intravenously over 30 minutes twice weekly for 12 doses. After treatment, patients were considered for resection.

RESULTS

Twenty-four assessable patients were recruited onto the trial. All but one patient completed a full 12 weeks of therapy. Grade 3 and 4 hematological and nonhematological toxicities were common but manageable, and neutropenic fever did not occur. No patient had local tumor progression. Twelve patients (50%) responded by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Group (RECIST) criteria, including one radiographic complete response. Seventeen patients underwent resection after therapy. Margin-negative resections were performed in 13 patients, including 9 patients whose disease was borderline or unresectable before treatment. A treatment effect was seen in all resection specimens. There have been no local recurrences of tumor, and several patients remain alive without evidence of disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Docetaxel/gemcitabine followed by gemcitabine/radiotherapy is active in the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, with manageable toxicity. Tumor downstaging occurs in some patients to allow complete resection. Further investigation of this regimen is warranted.

Phase I Study of Hyperfractionated Radiation Therapy with Protracted 5-Fluorouracil Infusion in Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the maximum-tolerated dose of hyperfractionated radiation therapy with protracted 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion in patients with locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Five cohorts of patients were scheduled to receive escalating doses of hyperfractionated radiation therapy (range, 45.6-64.8 Gy). All patients received two fractions of 1.2 Gy each (separated by 6 h) per day for 5 days a week, and received protracted 5-FU infusion (200 mg/m2/day) during the radiation course. The maximum-tolerated dose was defined as one dose level below the dose at which more than one third of 3-6 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients were enrolled in this study. The most common toxicities were nausea/vomiting and anorexia. Although 1 patient developed bleeding from a gastric ulcer 3 months after the completion of chemoradiotherapy, the maximum-tolerated dose was not reached even at the highest dose level (level 5, 64.8 Gy). The median survival time was 12.2 months and the 1-year survival rate was 55.0%.

CONCLUSION

The toxicity associated with our regimen was tolerable up to dose level 5 (64.8 Gy). We are currently conducting a phase II study of this hyperfractionated radiation therapy with protracted 5-FU infusion at a dose of 64.8 Gy.

Review article: chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is a common, highly lethal disease that is rising in incidence. Chemotherapy based on 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been shown to prolong survival in advanced pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine improves major symptoms and survival outcomes compared with bolus 5-FU. Many novel small molecules are being widely and actively researched. These compounds are based on classical mechanisms of action as well as biological therapies targeting novel cellular survival pathways, and include fluoropyrimidines, nucleoside cytidine analogues, platinum analogues, topoisomerase-inhibitors, antimicrotubule agents, proteasome inhibitors, vitamin D analogues, arachidonic acid pathway inhibitors, histone deacytylator inhibitors, farnesyltransferase inhibitors and epidermal growth factor receptor therapies. Adjuvant chemotherapy has also demonstrated the best survival outcomes following resection compared to other adjuvant or neo-adjuvant strategies such as radiation-based treatments. These benefits are superimposed on the dramatic increase in resectability rates and reduction in post-operative mortality achieved by centralisation of treatment in high-volume speciality centres. Newer 'small-molecule' drugs as well as the latest 'large-molecule' biological agents hold considerable promise for the future. Real advances are anticipated over the next five years but are dependent on large randomised controlled trials for success.