Effect of age on biochemical disease-free outcome in patients with T1-T3 prostate cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy in an equal-access health care system: a radiation oncology report of the Department of Defense Center for Prostate Disease Research

Impact of age on treatment response in men with prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy

Objective

To analyse the effect of age at diagnosis on clinical outcomes of localized prostate cancer (PCa) treated with radiation therapy.

Subjects and methods

We identified 12 784 patients with intermediate‐ or high‐risk localized PCa treated with radiation therapy (RT) and neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) between 2000 and 2015 from nationwide Veterans Affairs data. Patients were grouped into three age categories (≤59, 60–69, and ≥70 years old). Outcomes included immediate PSA response (3‐month post‐RT PSA and 2‐year PSA nadir, grouped into <0.10 ng/ml, 0.10–0.49 ng/ml, and ≥0.50 ng/ml), biochemical recurrence, and PCa‐specific mortality. Multivariable regression models included ordinal logistic regression for short‐term PSA outcomes, Cox regression for biochemical recurrence, and Fine‐Gray competing risks regression for PCa‐specific mortality.

Results

A total of 2136 patients (17%) were ≤59 years old at diagnosis, 6107 (48%) were 60–69 years old, and 4541 (36%) were ≥70 years old. Median follow‐up was 6.3 years. Younger age was associated with greater odds of higher 3‐month PSA group (≤59 vs. ≥70: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.90, 95% CI 1.64–2.20; p < 0.001) and higher 2‐year PSA nadir group (≤59 vs. ≥70: aOR 1.89, 95% CI 1.62–2.19, p < 0.001). Younger age was associated with greater risk of biochemical recurrence (≤59 vs. ≥70: adjusted hazard ratio 1.45, 95% CI 1.26–1.67, p < 0.001) but not PCa‐specific mortality (p = 0.16).

Conclusion

In a large nationwide sample of US veterans treated with ADT and RT for localized PCa, younger age was associated with inferior short‐term PSA response and higher risk of biochemical recurrence.

Impact of age at diagnosis on overall and disease-free survival in men with prostate cancer following conformal 3D radiation therapy

Aims and background

The impact of age on prostate cancer outcome has been controversial. The aim of the study was to evaluate the role of age on overall survival and disease-free survival in patients affected by prostate cancer when treated with 3D conformal radiation therapy.

Methods and study design

From 1999 to 2005, 1002 patients with T1–T3 prostate cancer were treated with 3D conformal radiation therapy, delivering a median dose of 75.6, 66.6 and 45 Gy to the prostate, seminal vesicles and pelvic nodes (if necessary), respectively. Patients were divided into four groups (<65, 65–70, 70–75, >75 years) according to age at diagnosis. The relationship between age and both overall survival and disease-free survival was calculated with Kaplan-Meier analysis and the comparison between curves was performed by the logrank test. ROC analysis allowed assessment of the best age cutoff.

Results

Mean age was 71 ± 6 years (median, 72). Median and mean follow-up was 71.4 and 69 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, there was no significant difference in the distribution of disease risk between age groups. Analysis demonstrated that older age is a strong positive predictor of survival (odds ratio for stratified patients older than 70 years was <1). In fact, at the 90 month follow-up, overall survival and disease-free survival varied with age, increasing from 85% to 95% and from 78% to 94%, respectively. ROC curve analysis yielded a cutoff age value discriminating overall survival and disease-free survival of 72 years.

Conclusions

Age is a strong positive predictor of overall survival and disease-free survival, playing a protective role for stratified patients up to 72 years of age.

Radiotherapy for early-stage prostate cancer in men under 70 years of age

AIMS

To demonstrate that radiotherapy (RT) is a valid alternative to surgery in men ≤70 years old with localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

From 1988 to 2009, 214 patients with T1-2 N0 M0 prostate cancer were treated with RT. The effects of patient- and treatment-related risk factors on toxicity were investigated.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 105 months (range 14.2-180). The 5-, 10-, and 15-year biochemical relapse-free survival for all 214 patients was 80%, 61.9%, and 57.5%, respectively. In bivariate analysis, age (≤65 vs 65-70 years) was not a significant factor for biochemical relapse, while radiation dose was (p = 0.05) in multivariate analysis. Cancer-specific survival rates at 5, 10, and 15 years were 98.4%, 93.2%, and 69.7%, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 167 months (95% confidence interval 147.3-186.7). The OS rates at 5, 10, and 15 years were 91.8%, 75.8%, and 42.5%, respectively. Acute genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities occurred in 105 (49%) and 98 patients (45.8%), respectively, with only 2 cases of grade III GI toxicity. Late GU and GI toxicities occurred in 17 (7.9%) and 20 (9.3%) patients, respectively, with 1 grade III GI toxicity and 2 grade III GU toxicities. Risk factors for late toxicity were age and RT dose and technique, which were unrelated to acute toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Age ≤70 years does not consistently confer a negative prognosis for localized prostate cancer. Radiotherapy appears to be a viable alternative to surgery, offering excellent long-term cancer control.

Prostate cancer in young men: an important clinical entity

Prostate cancer is considered a disease of older men (aged >65 years), but today over 10% of new diagnoses in the USA occur in young men aged ≤55 years. Early-onset prostate cancer, that is prostate cancer diagnosed at age ≤55 years, differs from prostate cancer diagnosed at an older age in several ways. Firstly, among men with high-grade and advanced-stage prostate cancer, those diagnosed at a young age have a higher cause-specific mortality than men diagnosed at an older age, except those over age 80 years. This finding suggests that important biological differences exist between early-onset prostate cancer and late-onset disease. Secondly, early-onset prostate cancer has a strong genetic component, which indicates that young men with prostate cancer could benefit from evaluation of genetic risk. Furthermore, although the majority of men with early-onset prostate cancer are diagnosed with low-risk disease, the extended life expectancy of these patients exposes them to long-term effects of treatment-related morbidities and to long-term risk of disease progression leading to death from prostate cancer. For these reasons, patients with early-onset prostate cancer pose unique challenges, as well as opportunities, for both research and clinical communities. Current data suggest that early-onset prostate cancer is a distinct phenotype-from both an aetiological and clinical perspective-that deserves further attention.

Young age under 60 years is not a contraindication to treatment with definitive dose escalated radiotherapy for prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

It is widely believed that younger prostate cancer patients are at greater risk of recurrence following radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS

From 1992 to 2007, 2168 (395 age ≤ 60) men received conformal RT alone for prostate cancer at our institution (median dose=76 Gy, range: 72-80). Multivariable analysis (MVA) was used to identify significant predictors for BF and PCSM. Cumulative incidence was estimated using the competing risk method (Fine and Gray) for BF (Phoenix definition) and PCSM to account for the competing risk of death.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 72.2 months (range: 24.0-205.1), 8-year BF was 27.1% for age ≤ 60 vs. 23.7% for age >60 (p=0.29). Eight-year PCSM was 3.0% for age ≤ 60 vs. 2.0% for age >60 (p=0.52). MVA for BF identified initial PSA [adjusted HR=1.7 (PSA 10-20), 2.6 (PSA >20), p<0.01], Gleason score [adjusted HR=2.1 (G7), 1.9 (G8-10), p<0.01], T-stage [adjusted HR=1.7 (T2b-c), 2.6 (T3-4), p<0.01], and initial androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) [adjusted HR=0.38 (ADT >12 months), p<0.01] as significant, but not age or ADT <12 months. MVA for PCSM identified Gleason score [adjusted HR=3.0 (G8-10), p=0.01] and T-stage [adjusted HR=8.7 (T3-4), p<0.01] as significant, but not age, PSA, or ADT.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest, most mature study of younger men treated with RT for prostate cancer that confirms young age is not prognostic for BF.

Prostate cancer in the elderly

Prostate cancer is the most frequent malignancy in men and predominantly in elderly men. The issue of prostate cancer is likely to assume greater importance with progressive aging of the population. With frequent use of PSA testing most patients were diagnosed with localized cancer even in senior adults. Cancer-specific mortality is low in elderly men with prostate cancer and is dependent on the aggressiveness of the tumor. Currently, no established guidelines for the management of prostate cancer in the elderly exist, and treatment of senior adults with localized cancer is not optimal. While elderly men with indolent disease will not benefit from curative treatment, some patients with aggressive cancers will progress if not adequately treated. Comorbidity is the main predictor of life expectancy in the elderly. In everyday clinical practice, treatment decisions are much more influenced by age than by comorbidity. Curative treatment is an effective treatment option for selected elderly with localized prostate cancer. Conversely, most elderly men with prostate cancer received hormonal therapy, although the benefit of hormonal therapy in localized cancer is not clear and is associated with severe toxicities in some patients. In conclusion, there is a need for more risk stratified approaches for the management of prostate cancer in the elderly to avoid unnecessary intervention in men who unlikely benefit from such intervention, and allow treatment in those who might benefit from it.

[Disease relapses after radical radiotherapy of prostate cancer--analysis of prognostic factors]

INTRODUCTION

Although there is no consensus on which is the best option in prostate cancer treatment, these patients could be successfully treated with radiotherapy. Regarding some prognostic factors, it is possible today to classify prostate cancer patients into several risk groups for clinical and biochemical relapse, and therefore to choose the right treatment modality.

OBJECTIVE

The objective in our study was to analyze the impact of tumour stage and grade, previous transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR), initial prostate specific antigen (PSA) level and age on disease relapse after radical radiotherapy of the prostate cancer.

METHOD

Between January 1991 and December 2005, a clinical, retrospective study was performed at the Radiotherapy Department of the Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, which included 283 patients with prostate cancer treated only with radical radiotherapy. During regular followup we analyzed response to treatment and disease relapse.

RESULTS

After radical radiotherapy disease relapse more often occurred (with statistical significance) in patients with locally advanced tumour (stage C 35% vs. A 13% vs. B 19%), low tumour grade (grade III 38% vs. grade II 23% vs. grade I 17%), initial PSA level over 10 ng/ml (29%) and over 20 ng/ml (37%) compared to 11% in the patients with initial PSA level below 10 ng/ml, and patients of lower age (less than 55 years 50% vs. 16% in patients over 70 years).

CONCLUSION

Tumour stage C, low tumour grade (grade II-III), initial PSA level over 10 ng/ml (over 20 ng/ml) and younger age are poor prognostic factors for disease relapse. In this case, radiotherapy as monotherapy is not an adequate approach, and it needs to be combined with other therapeutic modalities.

Prostate brachytherapy in men > or =75 years of age

PURPOSE

To evaluate cause-specific survival (CSS), biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), and overall survival (OS) in prostate cancer patients aged > or =75 years undergoing brachytherapy with or without supplemental therapies.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between April 1995 and August 2004, 145 consecutive patients aged > or =75 years underwent permanent prostate brachytherapy. Median follow-up was 5.8 years. Biochemical progression-free survival was defined by a prostate-specific antigen level < or =0.40 ng/mL after nadir. Patients with metastatic prostate cancer or hormone-refractory disease without obvious metastases who died of any cause were classified as dead of prostate cancer. All other deaths were attributed to the immediate cause of death. Multiple clinical, treatment, and dosimetric parameters were evaluated for impact on survival.

RESULTS

Nine-year CSS, bPFS, and OS rates for the entire cohort were 99.3%, 97.1%, and 64.5%, respectively. None of the evaluated parameters predicted for CSS, whereas bPFS was most closely predicted by percentage positive biopsies. Overall survival and non-cancer deaths were best predicted by tobacco status. Thirty-seven patients have died, with 83.8% of the deaths due to cardiovascular disease (22 patients) or second malignancies (9 patients). To date, only 1 patient (0.7%) has died of metastatic prostate cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

After brachytherapy, high rates of CSS and bPFS are noted in elderly prostate cancer patients. Overall, approximately 65% of patients are alive at 9 years, with survival most closely related to tobacco status. We believe our results support an aggressive locoregional approach in appropriately selected elderly patients.

Radiation therapy in the elderly

The purpose of this review is to highlight aspects of radiation oncology specifically related to aging and caring for the older patient with cancer. Particular emphasis is placed on the preclinical and clinical studies focusing on the efficacy and toxicity of RT in this population. Special techniques are also reviewed that have particular relevance to the treatment of the elderly.

Does age matter in the selection of treatment for men with early-stage prostate cancer?

BACKGROUND

The specific aim of the current study was to compare freedom from biochemical failure, distant metastases-free survival, and overall survival in men age < or = 55 years, men ages 60 to 69 years, and men age > or = 70 years presenting with localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

A matched pair analysis compared patients age < or = 55 years (Group 1) who were treated with 3-dimension conformal radiation without androgen deprivation to men age > or = 60 years and < 70 years (Group 2), and men age > or = 70 years (Group 3) who were treated at the Fox Chase Cancer Center between November 1989 and October 2001. The groups were matched for disease stage (T1/T2b vs. T2C/T3), Gleason grade (2-6 vs. 7-10), radiation dose (< 70 Gray [Gy] vs. > or = 70-76 Gy vs. > or = 76 Gy), and pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level. Estimates of outcome were accomplished using Kaplan-Meier methodology and compared by age group using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Eighty-four men were identified according to the selection criteria. No statistically significant difference was found in the 5-year overall survival rates for Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3 (94%, 95%, and 87%, respectively) or the 5-year rate of freedom from biochemical failure in Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3 (82%, 76%, and 70%, respectively), or freedom from distant metastases (96%, 97%, and 98%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Men age < or = 55 years who present with localized prostate cancer do not appear to have a worse prognosis. External beam radiation therapy appears to be a viable treatment alternative and should be offered to men age < or = 55 years who present with organ-confined prostate cancer.

3D conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer in elderly patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate if conformal radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer with doses of 70 Gy is well tolerated in patients aged 75 years or older, and if the side effects and the biochemical recurrence free (bNED) survival are comparable to younger patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighty patients>or=75 years received definitive conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Acute and late side effects as well as bNED survival (ASTRO criteria) were compared to 221 patients younger than 75 years who were treated during the same period of time.

RESULTS

Median dose to the prostate was 70 Gy in both groups. There were no significant differences in acute or late side effects between age groups. The frequency of grade III late symptoms was low and ranged between 0 and 4% for the evaluated symptoms irrespective of age group. Older patients had a better bNED survival than younger patients (bNED survival at 4 years: 76 vs. 61%, P=0.042).

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer is well tolerated in patients aged 75 years or older. In terms of bNED survival radiation treatment is at least as effective as it is for younger patients.

The curative role of radiotherapy in adenocarcinoma of the prostate in patients under 55 years of age: a rare cancer network retrospective study

To determine whether radiation therapy could be an acceptable alternative to surgery in young patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate, we analysed the outcome of 39 patients aged under 55 with organ confined tumours who received external radiation therapy in a curative intent. Our results suggest that similar local control in younger and older patients can be expected from either external beam radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy.

Influence of patient age on biochemical freedom from disease in patients undergoing conformal proton radiotherapy of organ-confined prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To examine a large, single-institution series of patients to test the perception among clinicians that radiotherapy is preferred for "older" patients and surgery should be indicated for "younger" men. Both radiotherapy and surgery are used to control prostate cancer, and both yield similar results in terms of long-term biochemical disease-free (bNED) survival.

METHODS

The bNED survival results from more than 1000 patients treated solely with conformal radiotherapy were analyzed to determine whether a difference in outcome supervened for patients younger than 60 years of age versus older patients.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference in bNED survival was found, in terms of patient age. Statistically significant predictors of outcome included pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage at diagnosis, and Gleason score.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient age younger than 60 years versus older than 60 years at treatment did not influence bNED survival significantly. Patient age at treatment should not be used in and of itself to recommend one type of treatment over another.

Is the alpha–beta ratio of prostate cancer really low? A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing standard and hyperfractionated conformal radiation therapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The objectives of the current study were to compare genito-urinary (GU) and gastro-intestinal (GI) toxicities as well as biochemical control (bRFS) in prostate cancer, utilizing conventional (2.0 Gy daily) (STD) or hyperfractionated (HFX) conformal irradiation (CRT). HFX (1.2 Gy BID) was chosen as a radiobiological method to try to reduce long term sequelae without compromising local control.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three-hundred-and-seventy consecutive patients (pts) entered this prospective, non-randomized trial in the period January 1993-January 2003; 209 were treated with STD and 161 with HFX CRT. All were evaluable for acute toxicity analysis, 179 (STD) and 151 pts (HFX) being evaluable for late sequelae and bRFS analyses. Pt characteristics were not statistically different in the two groups. CRT consisted of a 4-field technique for prostate and/or pelvic nodes and a 5-field boost with rectal shielding. Median doses were 74 and 79.2 Gy for STD and HFX patients respectively, the latter dose being isoeffective for tumour control assuming alpha/beta=10 (EQD(2)=73.9 Gy). Median follow-up was 29.4 months (25.2 mos for STD; 37.7 mos for HFX; P<0.01). The two regimens were compared in terms of acute and late GU and GI toxicities and 5-year bRFS by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Acute grade> or =2 GU toxicity was higher in the STD group (48.6% versus 37.3% in HFX, P=0.03), while no significant difference was found for acute GI toxicity. Late grade> or =2 GU and GI toxicities were lower in the HFX group (5-year actuarial rate: GU: 10.1% versus 20.3%, P=0.05; GI: 6.0% versus 10.6%, P=0.18). Five-year bRFS were 70% (+/-13.8%, 95% CI) and 82.6% (+/-7.2%) for STD and HFX, respectively (P=0.44); a trend favouring HFX was found in the subgroup of pts who did not receive hormonal therapy (5-year bRFS: 85.9%+/-12.4% versus 63.9%+/-23.8%, P=0.15). Multivariate analysis revealed only risk groups and age statistically related to bRFS but not fractionation regimen. Using the Nahum-Chapman TLCP model and prostate parameter set, which includes hypoxia, the TLCPs are approximately equal for the two regimens, whereas assuming alpha/beta=1.5 and no hypoxia we obtain 73% for the STD group but only 36% for the HFX group.

CONCLUSIONS

As expected from radiobiological considerations, HFX reduces GI and GU late toxicities. Concerning early bRFS, our clinical findings suggest that HFX is no less effective than STD when delivering an isoeffective (alpha/beta=10) dose. Despite the relatively short follow-up, this result appears to be inconsistent with a low alpha/beta ratio for prostate cancer.

PSA recurrence following radical prostatectomy is comparable for all age groups in the UK

Increasing numbers of men are being diagnosed with prostate cancer and undergo operative curative treatment. It has been suggested that outcome after radical prostatectomy (RP) may vary for different age groups.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether PSA recurrence-free survival after RP is related to age at operation for a cohort of English men.

METHODS

A total of 854 patients notes from four Urology units were audited for preoperative staging parameters and follow-up data obtained. The relationship of PSA, age, biopsy Gleason grade, clinical stage, era and institution on PSA recurrence-free survival was competitively assessed with a multivariate model.

RESULTS

Only preoperative PSA (P<0.0001) and biopsy Gleason grade (P < 0.0001) were found to be strongly associated with PSA recurrence-free survival on multivariate analysis. PSA recurrence-free survival probabilities at 5 y for patients aged 45-55 y, 55.1-60 y, 60.1-65 y, 65.1-70 y and 70.1-75 y were 0.59 (CI 0.47-0.71), 0.74 (CI 0.64-0.784), 0.56 (CI 0.44-0.68), 0.61 (CI 0.53-0.69) and 0.60 (CI 0.46-0.74), respectively. No significant difference of PSA recurrence-free survival between any of the age groups was found (Log-rank, P = 0.8567).

CONCLUSION

No significant difference of pathological variables or biochemical recurrence across the age groups was found. The widely held belief of poorer outcome in younger men selected for RP does not seem to be borne out by this study.

The impact of age and comorbidity on survival outcomes and treatment patterns in prostate cancer

The management of localized prostate cancer is based on stage, grade, PSA, and subjective assessment of comorbidity and life expectancy. Over the last 15 y, stage migration and the improved use of Gleason sum, PSA and TNM staging have led to many treatment options for patients with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer. At the same time, advances in treatment techniques have helped decrease the long-term complications of surgery and radiotherapy. However, the importance of age and comorbidity, in survival outcomes and treatment decision-making has been largely overlooked. Currently, stage, grade, and PSA are the only quantifiable variables consistently used in research and treatment decision-making. Comorbidity and life expectancy have remained largely subjective variables. Increasing longevity and a rapidly aging population have made age and comorbidity increasingly important factors in clinical research and treatment decision-making. This article reviews the importance of age and comorbidity on treatment decisions and survival outcomes in prostate cancer, as well as their use as objectively quantifiable variables. Examples from the general oncology literature are given. The overview also examines validated comorbidity indices and advocates the use of the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) in research outcomes and treatment decision-making in prostate cancer. Several clinical vignettes are provided to demonstrate the potential clinical utility of the CCI as applied to prostate cancer.

Radical radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer in elderly

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer is an age related neoplasm, with high incidence in the group of elderly man. The correct management must to be balanced between the benefits of the treatment and its disadvantages. Radiotherapy as definitive treatment is commonly reserved for older patients and patients with high surgical risk and is widely used as a treatment of choice.

AIM

The aim of this study was to determine the role of radical radiotherapy for localized prostate carcinoma in patients 70 years age or older concerning treatment morbidity, local control, disease free and overall survival.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A clinical prospective non-randomized study was performed including 103 elderly patients with an age 70 or above, between January 1991 and April 2005, at the Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia. Median age of patients was 74,89 years (range 70- 80 years). Stage distribution was as follows: stage A--3 patients (2.9%), stage B--69 patients (67%) and stage C--31 patients (30.1%). Out of 103 patients, initial PSA value was noted in 87 patients. The mean value of initial PSA was 18,06 ng/ml. Radical radiotherapy was conducted on megavoltage linear accelerators with high energy photons (10, 18 MeV) and total tumor dose of 65 Gy.

RESULTS

Low grade acute complications were registered in 70 patients (65%). Mean follow up time was 40, 13 months. The disease outcome at the last follow up show that 79 patients (76.7%) had no evidence of disease and 24 patients (23.3%) relapsed. Overall survival rates were 65, 29% and 44, 52% and disease free survival 66, 59% and 63, 26% at 5 and 10 years. Disease specific survival was at 5 and 10 years 73,32% and 65, 42% respectively. Late sequelas (gradus I and II) are registered in 22 patients (21.36%), out of 103.

CONCLUSION

Radical radiotherapy for localized carcinoma of the prostate is effective treatment option in elderly patients with good local control, present treatment tolerance providing good quality of life and long-term cure.

The 100-day PSA: usefulness as surrogate end point for biochemical disease-free survival after definitive radiotherapy of prostate cancer

Overall and biochemical disease-free (bNED) survival data after definitive radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer (CaP) requires decades of patient follow-up. Surrogates involving dynamics of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline, PSA nadir and time thereto have been unrewarding. This study investigated the metric of the PSA value 100 days after RT (PSA(100)), analyzed with respect to 8-y bNED survival. A total of 214 patients with T1-3 CaP were treated with definitive RT (defined as dose >66 Gy) in our institution between 1/1/1988 and 12/31/2000. All were subject to continuous follow-up with routine PSA levels. Biochemical failure (77 patients) was defined by the ASTRO criteria (n=67) or by the date of first hormonal therapy for a rising PSA, which did not meet the ASTRO criteria (n=10). No patients were included if they received postoperative radiation, or if hormones were administered prior to bNED recurrence, if any. Patients were stratified by PSA(100) values </= or >4.0 ng/ml, and </= or <2.5 ng/ml. Median follow-up was 64.3 months: follow-up data were calculated as of time to last PSA, with data collection as of 12/31/02. Patients with PSA(100)</=4.0 ng/ml had 62% 8-y bNED survival, and those with PSA(100)>4.0 ng/ml had 20% 8-y bNED survival (P<0.001). Use of a PSA(100) cutoff of 2.5 ng/ml yielded no significant difference in 8-y bNED survival (P=0.229). Cox proportional analysis revealed that initial PSA (P=0.006), stage (P=0.001) and PSA(100)</=4.0 ng/ml (P=0.002) were significantly related to bNED survival, but that age (P=0.887), race (P=0.500), RT dose (P=0.669), Gleason sum (P=0.091), and PSA(100)</=2.5 ng/ml (P=0.128) were not. In conclusion, PSA(100) using a cutoff of 4 ng/ml is a valuable and reliable surrogate for bNED survival after definitive RT, requiring less follow-up than other metrics. Patients with less values will have only about a 1 in 3 chance of bNED failure at 8 y.

Do younger men have better biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy?

OBJECTIVES

To examine the relationship between age and biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy (RP), controlling for the year of surgery. Prior studies have suggested that younger men have lower prostate-specific antigen recurrence rates after RP, although none of the prior studies had controlled for the year of surgery.

METHODS

We examined the data from 1753 men treated with RP between 1988 and 2002 at five equal access medical centers. We compared age, as a categorical variable according to decade of life (50 years old or younger, 51 to 60, 61 to 70, and older than 70 years), with the clinical and pathologic variables at RP, as well as the time to biochemical recurrence, using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Age was significantly related to the year of surgery, with the more recently treated patients being younger than less recently treated patients (P <0.001). After controlling for the year of surgery, the younger men had smaller prostates, fewer high-grade tumors on biopsy, and less lymph node metastasis, but a greater percentage of cores with cancer. On multivariate analysis, men 50 years old or younger had significantly lower recurrence rates than did the older men. Moreover, men older than 70 years had significantly greater prostate-specific antigen failure rates than men aged 51 to 70 years or men aged 50 years or younger.

CONCLUSIONS

The average age of men undergoing RP has decreased with time. Independent of this, young men have more favorable outcomes after RP than older men. Continued screening to detect prostate cancer among younger men when it is most curable appears warranted.