Impact of differences in ultrasound and computed tomography volumes on treatment planning of permanent prostate implants

AAPM Task Group Report 267: A joint AAPM GEC-ESTRO report on biophysical models and tools for the planning and evaluation of brachytherapy

Brachytherapy utilizes a multitude of radioactive sources and treatment techniques that often exhibit widely different spatial and temporal dose delivery patterns. Biophysical models, capable of modeling the key interacting effects of dose delivery patterns with the underlying cellular processes of the irradiated tissues, can be a potentially useful tool for elucidating the radiobiological effects of complex brachytherapy dose delivery patterns and for comparing their relative clinical effectiveness. While the biophysical models have been used largely in research settings by experts, it has also been used increasingly by clinical medical physicists over the last two decades. A good understanding of the potentials and limitations of the biophysical models and their intended use is critically important in the widespread use of these models. To facilitate meaningful and consistent use of biophysical models in brachytherapy, Task Group 267 (TG-267) was formed jointly with the American Association of Physics in Medicine (AAPM) and The Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie and the European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (GEC-ESTRO) to review the existing biophysical models, model parameters, and their use in selected brachytherapy modalities and to develop practice guidelines for clinical medical physicists regarding the selection, use, and interpretation of biophysical models. The report provides an overview of the clinical background and the rationale for the development of biophysical models in radiation oncology and, particularly, in brachytherapy; a summary of the results of literature review of the existing biophysical models that have been used in brachytherapy; a focused discussion of the applications of relevant biophysical models for five selected brachytherapy modalities; and the task group recommendations on the use, reporting, and implementation of biophysical models for brachytherapy treatment planning and evaluation. The report concludes with discussions on the challenges and opportunities in using biophysical models for brachytherapy and with an outlook for future developments.

Computed tomographic quantitative evaluation of common bile duct size in normal dogs: A reference range study considering body weight

Introduction

Common bile duct (CBD) measurements are important for the evaluation of biliary systemic disorders. However, in veterinary medicine, reference ranges for specific body weights (BW) and correlation between CBD diameter and BW have not been studied. This study aimed to establish normal reference ranges of CBD diameter for different BW groups and to analyse correlation between CBD diameter and BW in dogs without hepatobiliary disease. Additionally, normal reference ranges of CBD to aorta ratio (CBD: Ao ratio) were established which is not affected by BW.

Methods

CBD diameter was measured at three different sites: porta hepatis (PH), duodenal papilla (DP) level and mid-portion (Mid) between these points using computed tomography (CT) in 283 dogs without hepatobiliary disease.

Results

The reference range of CBD diameter at PH level: 1.69 ± 0.29 mm (Class 1; 1 kg ≤ BW < 5 kg), 1.92 ± 0.35 mm (Class 2; 5 kg ≤ BW < 10 kg), 2.20 ± 0.43 mm (Class 3; 10 kg ≤ BW < 15 kg), 2.79 ± 0.49 mm (Class 4; 15 kg ≤ BW < 30 kg); Mid-level: 2.06 ± 0.25 mm (Class 1), 2.43 ± 0.37 mm (Class 2), 2.74 ± 0.52 mm (Class 3), 3.14 ± 0.44 mm (Class 4); DP level: 2.33 ± 0.34 mm (Class 1), 2.90 ± 0.36 mm (Class 2), 3.35 ± 0.49 mm (Class 3), and 3.83 ± 0.50 mm (Class 4). There was a significant difference in CBD diameter at each level among all BW groups. Furthermore, BW and CBD diameter showed positive linear correlation at each level. We devised CBD: Ao ratio at each level that showed no significant difference between the different BW groups; PH level: 0.34 ± 0.05; Mid-level: 0.42 ± 0.06; DP level: 0.47 ± 0.06.

Conclusion

In conclusion, since the CBD diameter for each BW is significantly different, different normal reference ranges of CBD diameter should be applied for each BW, and the CBD: Ao ratio can be used regardless of the BW.

ACR-ABS-ASTRO Practice Parameter for Transperineal Permanent Brachytherapy of Prostate Cancer

AIM/OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND

The American College of Radiology (ACR), American Brachytherapy Society (ABS), and American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) have jointly developed the following practice parameter for transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer. Transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer is the interstitial implantation of low-dose rate radioactive seeds into the prostate gland for the purpose of treating localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

This practice parameter was developed according to the process described under the heading The Process for Developing ACR Practice Parameters and Technical Standards on the ACR website (https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Practice-Parameters-and-Technical-Standards) by the Committee on Practice Parameters-Radiation Oncology of the Commission on Radiation Oncology, in collaboration with ABS and ASTRO.

RESULTS

This practice parameter provides a framework for the appropriate use of low-dose rate brachytherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer either as monotherapy or as part of a treatment regimen combined with external-beam radiation therapy. The practice parameter defines the qualifications and responsibilities of all involved radiation oncology personnel, including the radiation oncologist, medical physicist, dosimetrist, radiation therapist, and nursing staff. Patient selection criteria and the utilization of supplemental therapies such as external-beam radiation therapy and androgen deprivation therapy are discussed. The logistics of the implant procedure, postimplant dosimetry assessment, and best practices with regard to safety and quality control are presented.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to established standards can help to ensure that permanent prostate brachytherapy is delivered in a safe and efficacious manner.

Use of deformable image registration techniques to estimate dose to organs at risk following prostate external beam radiation therapy and high-dose-rate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

The purpose of this investigation was to examine differences in estimates of accumulated rectal dose when using deformable image registration (DIR) compared with rigid image registration (RIR) methods, and parameter addition methods for combined transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) treatments of prostate cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, data from 10 patients who had previously received HDR-BT in one 15 Gy fraction, followed by 46 Gy EBRT in twenty-three fractions were used. To estimate total combined dose to the rectum, dose accumulation using both DIR and RIR methods were compared with parameter addition methods, which assume the same region of rectal anatomy receives the maximum dose from both treatment modalities. For both rigid and deformable image registration techniques, the quality of image registration was evaluated through metrics, including mean distance to agreement and dice similarity coefficient of prostate contours. Total D1cc and D2cc for the rectum was calculated and compared using each method.

RESULTS

The parameter addition methods predicted the highest accumulated dose to the rectum. On average, the predicted D2cc dose was higher than that calculated by the DIR method by 6.59 Gy EQD2 (range, -3.03 to 13.68 Gy EQD2) for partial parameter addition (PPA), and 4.88 Gy EQD2 (range, -3.41 to 11.97 Gy EQD2) for the full parameter addition (FPA) methods. Similarly, RIR predicted higher average doses compared with DIR, with a difference of 3.46 Gy EQD2 (range, -5.50 to 7.90 Gy EQD2). The results showed a significant difference between DIR and parameter addition methods for dose estimation.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study demonstrates significant differences in accumulated rectal dose prediction using different image registration methods. Each method has limitations in its application, and when used with real-time HDR-BT dose planning, awareness of these limitations is essential.

Prostate deformation from inflatable rectal probe cover and dosimetric effects in prostate seed implant brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Prostate brachytherapy is an important treatment technique for patients with localized prostate cancer. An inflatable rectal ultrasound probe cover is frequently utilized during the procedure to adjust for unfavorable prostate position relative to the implant grid. However, the inflated cover causes prostate deformation, which is not accounted for during dosimetric planning. Most of the therapeutic dose is delivered after the procedure when the prostate and surrounding organs-at-risk are less deformed. The aim of this study is to quantify the potential dosimetry changes between the initial plan (prostate deformed) and the more realistic dosimetry when the prostate is less deformed without the cover.

METHODS

The authors prospectively collected the ultrasound images of the prostate immediately preceding and just after inflation of the rectal probe cover from thirty-four consecutive patients undergoing real-time planning of I-125 permanent seed implant. Manual segmentations of the deformed and undeformed images from each case were used as the input for model training to generate the initial transformation of a testing patient. During registration, the pixel-to-pixel transformation was further optimized to maximize the mutual information between the transferred deformed image and the undeformed images. The accuracy of image registration was evaluated by comparing the displacement of the urethra and calcification landmarks and by determining the Dice index between the registered and manual prostate contours. After registration, using the optimized transformation, the implanted seeds were mapped from the deformed prostate onto the undeformed prostate. The dose distribution of the undeformed anatomy, calculated using the VariSeed treatment planning system, was then analyzed and compared with that of the deformed prostate.

RESULTS

The accuracy of image registration was 1.5 ± 1.0 mm when evaluated by the displacement of calcification landmarks, 1.9 ± 1.1 mm when characterized by the displacement of the centroid of the urethra, and 0.86 ± 0.05 from the determination of the Dice index of prostate contours. The magnitude of dosimetric changes was associated with the degree of prostate deformation. The prostate coverage V100% dropped from 96.6 ± 1.7% on prostate-deformed plans to 92.6 ± 3.8% (p < 0.01) on undeformed plans, and the rectum V100% decreased from 0.48 ± 0.39 to 0.06 ± 0.14 cm³ (p < 0.01). The dose to the urethra increased, with the V150% increasing from 0.02 ± 0.06 to 0.11 ± 0.10 cm³ (p < 0.01) and D1% changing from 203.5 ± 22.7 to 239.5 ± 25.6 Gy (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Prostate deformation from the inflation of an ultrasound rectal probe cover can significantly alter brachytherapy dosimetry. The authors have developed a deformable image registration method that allows for the characterization of dose with the undeformed anatomy. This may be used to more accurately reflect the dosimetry when the prostate is not deformed by the probe cover.

Consequences of Intermodality Registration Errors for Intramodality 3D Ultrasound IGRT

Intramodality ultrasound image-guided radiotherapy systems compare daily ultrasound to reference ultrasound images. Nevertheless, because the actual treatment planning is based on a reference computed tomography image, and not on a reference ultrasound image, their accuracy depends partially on the correct intermodality registration of the reference ultrasound and computed tomography images for treatment planning. The error propagation in daily patient positioning due to potential registration errors at the planning stage was assessed in this work. Five different scenarios were simulated involving shifts or rotations of ultrasound or computed tomography images. The consequences of several workflow procedures were tested with a phantom setup. As long as the reference ultrasound and computed tomography images are made to match, the patient will be in the correct treatment position. In an example with a phantom measurement, the accuracy of the performed manual fusion was found to be ≤2 mm. In clinical practice, manual registration of patient images is expected to be more difficult. Uncorrected mismatches will lead to a systematically incorrect final patient position because there will be no indication that there was a misregistration between the computed tomography and reference ultrasound images. In the treatment room, the fusion with the computed tomography image will not be visible and based on the ultrasound images the patient position seems correct.

Review of ultrasound image guidance in external beam radiotherapy: I. Treatment planning and inter-fraction motion management

In modern radiotherapy, verification of the treatment to ensure the target receives the prescribed dose and normal tissues are optimally spared has become essential. Several forms of image guidance are available for this purpose. The most commonly used forms of image guidance are based on kilovolt or megavolt x-ray imaging. Image guidance can also be performed with non-harmful ultrasound (US) waves. This increasingly used technique has the potential to offer both anatomical and functional information.This review presents an overview of the historical and current use of two-dimensional and three-dimensional US imaging for treatment verification in radiotherapy. The US technology and the implementation in the radiotherapy workflow are described. The use of US guidance in the treatment planning process is discussed. The role of US technology in inter-fraction motion monitoring and management is explained, and clinical studies of applications in areas such as the pelvis, abdomen and breast are reviewed. A companion review paper (O'Shea et al 2015 Phys. Med. Biol. submitted) will extensively discuss the use of US imaging for intra-fraction motion quantification and novel applications of US technology to RT.

Iodine-125 thin seeds decrease prostate swelling during transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy

INTRODUCTION

Prostate swelling following seed implantation is a well-recognised phenomenon. The purpose of this intervention was to assess whether using thinner seeds reduces post-implant swelling with permanent prostate brachytherapy.

METHODS

Eighteen consecutive patients eligible for prostate seed brachytherapy underwent seed implantation using iodine-125 (I-125) thin seeds. Operative time, dosimetry, prostate swelling and toxicity were assessed and compared with standard I-125 stranded seed controls, sourced from the department's brachytherapy database.

RESULTS

A learning curve was noted with the thin seeds in terms of greater bending and deviation of needles from their intended path. This translated into significantly longer total operative time (88 vs 103 minutes; P = 0.009, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.1-24.3) and time per needle insertion (2.6 vs 3.7 minutes; P < 0.001, 95% CI 0.5-1.3) for the thin seeds. Day 30 prostate volumes were significantly smaller in the thin seed group compared with standard seeds (40.9 cc vs 46.8 cc; P = 0.001, 95% CI 1.5-5.6). The ratio of preoperative transrectal ultrasound to day 30 post-implant CT volume was also smaller in the thin seed group (1.2 ± 0.1 for standard seeds vs 1.1 ± 0.1 for thin seeds). Post-implant dosimetric parameters were comparable for both groups. No significant differences were seen in acute urinary morbidity or quality of life between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

I-125 thin seeds are associated with an initial learning curve, with longer operative time, even for experienced brachytherapists. The significant reduction in day 30 prostate volumes with the thin seeds has useful implications in terms of optimising dose coverage to the prostate in the early period post-implantation, as well as improving the accuracy of post-implant dosimetric assessments.

Changes in radiobiological parameters in 131Cs permanent prostate implants

In prostate permanent implants using 131Cs seeds, the prostatic edema developed during the implantation procedure, increases the separation between the seeds. This leads to a decrease in the prostate coverage and thus causes an edema induced dose reduction, which results in an increase in tumour cell surviving fraction (SF) with a corresponding decrease in tumour control probability (TCP). To investigate the impact of edema on the SF and the TCP, the expression of the SF of the linear quadratic (LQ) model was extended to account for the effects of edema using the exponential nature of edema resolution and the dose delivered to the edematous prostate. The SF and the TCP for edematous prostate implants were calculated for 31 patients who underwent real time 131Cs permanent seed implantation. The dose delivered to the edematous prostate was calculated to compute the SF and the TCP for these patients for edema half lives (EHL) ranging from 4 days to 34 days and for edemas of magnitudes (M0) varying from 5 to 60% of the actual prostate volume.

A reduction in the dose delivered to the edematous prostate was found with the increase of EHL and edema magnitude which results in an increase of the SF, and corresponding decrease in the TCP. The dose reductions in 131Cs implants varied from 1.1% (for EHL = 4 days and M0 = 5%) to 32.3% (for EHL = 34 days and M0 = 60%). These are higher than the dose reduction in 125I implants, which vary from 0.3% (for EHL = 4 days and M0 = 5%) to 17.5% (for EHL = 34 days and M0 = 60%). As edema half life increased from 4 days to 34 days and edema magnitude increased from 5 to 60% the SF increased by 4.57 log, and the TCP decreased by 0.80. Compensation of edema induced increase in the SF and decrease in the TCP in 131Cs seed implants should be carefully done by redefining seed positions with the guidance of post-needle plans. The presented model in this study can be used to estimate the SF or the TCP for pre plan or real time permanent prostate implants using day 0 post-implant CT images.

Magnetic resonance imaging-based treatment planning for prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) is the standard imaging modality for planning prostate brachytherapy. However, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides greater anatomic detail than TRUS. We compared treatment plans generated using TRUS, endorectal coil MRI (erMRI), and standard body array coil MRI (sMRI).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Treatment plans were used from patients treated with permanent, stranded-seed (125)I brachytherapy in a prospective trial. All men underwent pretreatment planning based on TRUS, and all underwent erMRI before treatment and sMRI 30 days after the implant. Treatments for 20 consecutive patients were replanned on sMRI and erMRI images by investigators blinded to TRUS-based plans. Prostate volume/dimensions, radioactivity-to-prostate-volume ratio, and dosimetric parameters were compared.

RESULTS

Compared with TRUS, mean prostate volume measured by erMRI was smaller, medial-lateral diameter was larger, and anterior-posterior diameter was smaller, suggesting that the endorectal coil produced anatomic distortions. Craniocaudal prostate length was smaller on both types of MRI than on TRUS, suggesting that TRUS overestimates prostate length. Activity per volume was 7.5% lower for plans based on sMRI than on TRUS (0.901 vs. 0.974mCi/cm(3), p<0.001). sMRI plans had similar coverage of the planning target volume (PTV) (dose to 90% of the prostate [D(90)] 116.6% sMRI vs. 117.5% TRUS, p=0.526) and improved dose homogeneity (percentage of PTV receiving 150% of the prescription dose [V(150)] 47.4% sMRI vs. 53.8% TRUS, p=0.001 and percentage of PTV receiving 200% of the prescription dose [V(200)] 16.6% sMRI vs. 19.2% TRUS, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Staging erMRI should not be routinely used for treatment planning because it produces anatomic distortion. sMRI may have treatment planning advantages over TRUS because of superior soft-tissue delineation of the prostate and adjacent normal tissue structures.

Quality indicators and technique for analyzing permanent I-125 prostate seed implants: seven years postimplant dosimetry evaluation

PURPOSE

The roles of postimplant dosimetry (PID) after permanent I-125 implant are to identify and rectify inadequate implants, assess the dosimetric quality indicators, and evaluate dose to the organs at risk. The aim of the current work was to assess the progress of prostate implant quality via postimplant dosimetry over seven years.

METHODS

The following factors were investigated to assess the PID results obtained over seven years: the improvement in implant technique, the computed tomography (CT) delineation-based PID versus ultrasound-CT (US-CT) fusion-based PID, and the evolution of parameters such as D90 and NDR (natural dose ratio). The correlation between dosimetric parameters and clinical outcomes were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The seven years PID learning curve shows clear changes in dosimetric trend for the 265 patients studied. Manual target contouring on CT was shown to overestimate the prostate volume when compared to ultrasound data, translating to CT-based D90 values being lower than US-CT D90. It was found that NDR does not contribute with additional dosimetric information to postimplant dosimetry evaluation. Patient follow-up data show that 4.7% patients have relapsed, and urinary retention was reported in 2.7% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

CT-based PID was found less reliable than US-CT fusion-based PID due to target volume overestimation. This result shows the biased interpretation of low D90 values based on CT-based targeting, providing unreliable correlations between D90 and relapse probability. The low urinary retention statistics are in accordance with the PID data for the organ, as only 5.2% of patients had their PID D10 > 218 Gy, i.e., above the recommended GEC-ESTRO guidelines. Besides the "learning" component, the PID D90 curve is influenced by the PID technique.

THE APPLICATION OF FULL SCALE 3D ANTHROPOMETRIC DIGITAL MODEL SYSTEM IN RADIOTHERAPY POSITIONING AND VERIFICATION

The full scale 3D Anthropometric Digital Model system is a technique combining digital imaging, three-dimensional (3D) image processing and reverse engineering to produce a full-scale solid Anthropometric Digital Model. This paper describes the Anthropometric Digital Model being made and used in radiation treatment. By using computed tomography and optical scanning, the data required for the Anthropometric Digital Model is collected. Through surface reconstruction, a model of the patient skull is made, after which rapid prototyping and rapid tooling is applied to acquire a 1:1 solid model. Thus, without the patient needing to be present, the medical physicist or dosimetrist will be able to design a treatment plan tailored to the patient and to simulate all kinds of situations on the simulator and the linear accelerator for positioning and verification. We expect that the application of Anthropometric Digital Model can reduce the time spent on pretreatment procedures in radiotherapy and enhance the quality of health care for cancer patients.

Comparison of template-matching and singular-spectrum-analysis methods for imaging implanted brachytherapy seeds

Brachytherapy using small implanted radioactive seeds is becoming an increasingly popular method for treating prostate cancer, in which a radiation oncologist implants seeds in the prostate transperineally under ultrasound guidance. Dosimetry software determines the optimal placement of seeds for achieving the prescribed dose based on ultrasonic determination of the gland boundaries. However, because of prostate movement and distortion during the implantation procedure, some seeds may not be placed in the desired locations; this causes the delivered dose to differ from the prescribed dose. Current ultrasonic imaging methods generally cannot depict the implanted seeds accurately. We are investigating new ultrasonic imaging methods that show promise for enhancing the visibility of seeds and thereby enabling real-time detection and correction of seed-placement errors during the implantation procedure. Real-time correction of seed-placement errors will improve the therapeutic radiation dose delivered to target tissues. In this work, we compare the potential performance of a template-matching method and a previously published method based on singular spectrum analysis for imaging seeds. In particular, we evaluated how changes in seed angle and position relative to the ultrasound beam affect seed detection. The conclusion of the present study is that singular spectrum analysis has better sensitivity but template matching is more resistant to false positives; both perform well enough to make seed detection clinically feasible over a relevant range of angles and positions. Combining the information provided by the two methods may further reduce ambiguities in determining where seeds are located.

Objective automated assessment of time trends in prostate edema after (125)I implantation

PURPOSE

To present an objective automated method to determine time trends in prostatic edema resulting from iodine-125 brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We followed 20 patients, implanted with stranded seeds, with seven consecutive CT scans to establish a time trend in prostate edema. Seed positions were obtained automatically from the CT series. The change in seed positions was used as surrogate for edema. Two approaches were applied to model changes in volume. (1) A cylindrical model: seeds from the compared distribution were linked to the reference distribution of Day 28. After alignment, the compared distribution was scaled in cylindrical coordinates, leading to the changes in radial and craniocaudal directions. The volume changes were calculated using these scaling factors. (2) A spherical model: distances of seeds to the center of gravity of all seeds were used as a measure to model volume changes.

RESULTS

With Day 28 as reference, the observed volume changes were smaller than 18% ± 6% (1 standard deviation) for the cylindrical model and 12% ± 7% for the spherical model. One day after implantation, the implanted prostate was less than 10% larger than in the reference scan for both models. Apart from Day 0, both models showed similar volume changes.

CONCLUSIONS

We present an objective automated method to determine changes in the implanted prostate volume, eliminating the influence of an observer in the assessment of the prostate size. The implanted volume change was less than 18% ± 7% for the studied group of 20 patients. Edema was 9% ± 5% from 1 day after implantation onward.

The impact of prostate edema on cell survival and tumor control after permanent interstitial brachytherapy for early stage prostate cancers

Previous studies have shown that procedure-induced prostate edema during permanent interstitial brachytherapy (PIB) can cause significant variations in the dose delivered to the prostate gland. Because the clinical impact of edema-induced dose variations strongly depends on the magnitude of the edema, the temporal pattern of its resolution and its interplay with the decay of radioactivity and the underlying biological processes of tumor cells (such as tumor potential doubling time), we investigated the impact of edema-induced dose variations on the tumor cell survival and tumor control probability after PIB with the (131)Cs, (125)I and (103)Pd sources used in current clinical practice. The exponential edema resolution model reported by Waterman et al (1998 Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 41 1069-77) was used to characterize the edema evolutions previously observed during clinical PIB for prostate cancer. The concept of biologically effective dose, taking into account tumor cell proliferation and sublethal damage repair during dose delivery, was used to characterize the effects of prostate edema on cell survival and tumor control probability. Our calculation indicated that prostate edema, if not appropriately taken into account, can increase the cell survival and decrease the probability of local control of PIB. The magnitude of an edema-induced increase in cell survival increased with increasing edema severity, decreasing half-life of radioactive decay and decreasing photon energy emitted by the source. At the doses currently prescribed for PIB and for prostate cancer cells characterized by nominal radiobiology parameters recommended by AAPM TG-137, PIB using (125)I sources was less affected by edema than PIB using (131)Cs or (103)Pd sources due to the long radioactive decay half-life of (125)I. The effect of edema on PIB using (131)Cs or (103)Pd was similar. The effect of edema on (103)Pd PIB was slightly greater, even though the decay half-life of (103)Pd (17 days) is longer than that of (131)Cs (9.7 days), because the advantage of the longer (103)Pd decay half-life was negated by the lower effective energy of the photons it emits (∼21 keV compared to ∼30.4 keV for (131)Cs). In addition, the impact of edema could be reduced or enhanced by differences in the tumor characteristics (e.g. potential tumor doubling time or the α/β ratio), and the effect of these factors varied for the different radioactive sources. There is a clear need to consider the effects of prostate edema during the planning and evaluation of permanent interstitial brachytherapy treatments for prostate cancer.

Image fusion techniques in permanent seed implantation

Over the last twenty years major software and hardware developments in brachytherapy treatment planning, intraoperative navigation and dose delivery have been made. Image-guided brachytherapy has emerged as the ultimate conformal radiation therapy, allowing precise dose deposition on small volumes under direct image visualization. In this process imaging plays a central role and novel imaging techniques are being developed (PET, MRI-MRS and power Doppler US imaging are among them), creating a new paradigm (dose-guided brachytherapy), where imaging is used to map the exact coordinates of the tumour cells, and to guide applicator insertion to the correct position. Each of these modalities has limitations providing all of the physical and geometric information required for the brachytherapy workflow. Therefore, image fusion can be used as a solution in order to take full advantage of the information from each modality in treatment planning, intraoperative navigation, dose delivery, verification and follow-up of interstitial irradiation. Image fusion, understood as the visualization of any morphological volume (i.e. US, CT, MRI) together with an additional second morphological volume (i.e. CT, MRI) or functional dataset (functional MRI, SPECT, PET), is a well known method for treatment planning, verification and follow-up of interstitial irradiation. The term image fusion is used when multiple patient image datasets are registered and overlaid or merged to provide additional information. Fused images may be created from multiple images from the same imaging modality taken at different moments (multi-temporal approach), or by combining information from multiple modalities. Quality means that the fused images should provide additional information to the brachytherapy process (diagnosis and staging, treatment planning, intraoperative imaging, treatment delivery and follow-up) that cannot be obtained in other ways. In this review I will focus on the role of image fusion for permanent seed implantation.

Rectal morbidity after permanent interstitial brachytherapy for prostate cancer--impact of day 1 vs. day 30 computed tomography-based postimplant dosimetry

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to evaluate bowel quality-of-life changes after prostate brachytherapy and the impact of Day 1 vs. Day 30 postimplant dosimetry.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In 61 patients, computed tomography (CT) scans were performed at Days 1 and 30 after (125)I brachytherapy. The patients have been surveyed prospectively before (time A), 1 month (time B), and >1 year after treatment (time C) using a validated questionnaire (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite). Different parameters were tested for their predictive value on bowel quality-of-life changes (bowel bother score decrease >20 points at time B=BB20; bowel bother score decrease >10 points at time C=BC10), including seed displacements.

RESULTS

Mean bowel function/bother score decreased 13/13 points at time B (p<0.01) and 1/4 points at time C (change not significant). BB20 and BC10 were found in 25% and 20% of patients, respectively. Bowel bother score declines at time B correlated well with declines at time C (r=0.53; p<0.01). Prostate volume before implantation and the number of seeds per cubic centimeters were found to be predictive for BB20 and BC10. Smaller rectal wall volumes covered by the 60-100% isodoses at Day 1 were (paradoxically) found to be significantly predictive for BC10. Larger posterior seed displacements between Days 1 and 30 were significantly associated with BB20.

CONCLUSIONS

Quality-of-life scores have not been found to change significantly >1 year after brachytherapy. Larger rectal wall volumes within higher isodoses at Day 1 or 30 were not found to be predisposing for adverse quality-of-life changes.

Evaluation of targeting errors in ultrasound-assisted radiotherapy

A method for validating the start-to-end accuracy of a 3-D ultrasound (US)-based patient positioning system for radiotherapy is described. A radiosensitive polymer gel is used to record the actual dose delivered to a rigid phantom after being positioned using 3-D US guidance. Comparison of the delivered dose with the treatment plan allows accuracy of the entire radiotherapy treatment process, from simulation to 3-D US guidance, and finally delivery of radiation, to be evaluated. The 3-D US patient positioning system has a number of features for achieving high accuracy and reducing operator dependence. These include using tracked 3-D US scans of the target anatomy acquired using a dedicated 3-D ultrasound probe during both the simulation and treatment sessions, automatic 3-D US-to-US registration and use of infrared LED (IRED) markers of the optical position-sensing system for registering simulation computed tomography to US data. The mean target localization accuracy of this system was 2.5 mm for four target locations inside the phantom, compared with 1.6 mm obtained using the conventional patient positioning method of laser alignment. Because the phantom is rigid, this represents the best possible set-up accuracy of the system. Thus, these results suggest that 3-D US-based target localization is practically feasible and potentially capable of increasing the accuracy of patient positioning for radiotherapy in sites where day-to-day organ shifts are greater than 1 mm in magnitude.

On the need to compensate for edema-induced dose reductions in preplanned (131)Cs prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Surgical trauma-induced edema and its protracted resolution can lead to significant dose reductions in preplanned (131)Cs prostate brachytherapy. The purpose of this work was to examine whether these dose reductions should be actively compensated for and to estimate the magnitude of the additional irradiation needed for dose compensation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The quantitative edema resolution characteristics observed by Waterman et al. were used to examine the physical and radiobiologic effects of prostate edema in preplanned (131)Cs implants. The need for dose compensation was assessed using the dose responses observed in (125)I and (103)Pd prostate implants. The biologically effective dose, calculated with full consideration of edema evolution, was used to estimate the additional irradiation needed for dose compensation.

RESULTS

We found that the edema-induced dose reduction in preplanned (131)Cs implants could easily exceed 10% of the prescription dose for implants with moderate or large edema. These dose reductions could lead to a >10% reduction in the biochemical recurrence-free survival for individual patients if the effect of edema was ignored. For a prescribed dose of 120 Gy, the number of 2-Gy external beam fractions needed to compensate for a 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 25% edema-induced dose reduction would be one, four, six, seven, and nine, respectively, for prostate cancer with a median potential doubling time of 42 days. The required additional irradiation increased for fast-growing tumors and/or those less efficient in sublethal damage repair.

CONCLUSION

Compensation of edema-induced dose reductions in preplanned (131)Cs prostate brachytherapy should be actively considered for those implants with moderate or large edema.

Tumour and target volumes in permanent prostate brachytherapy: A supplement to the ESTRO/EAU/EORTC recommendations on prostate brachytherapy

The aim of this paper is to supplement the GEC/ESTRO/EAU recommendations for permanent seed implantations in prostate cancer to develop consistency in target and volume definition for permanent seed prostate brachytherapy. Recommendations on target and organ at risk (OAR) definitions and dosimetry parameters to be reported on post implant planning are given.

A greedy heuristic using adjoint functions for the optimization of seed and needle configurations in prostate seed implant

We continue our work on the development of an efficient treatment-planning algorithm for prostate seed implants by incorporation of an automated seed and needle configuration routine. The treatment-planning algorithm is based on region of interest (ROI) adjoint functions and a greedy heuristic. As defined in this work, the adjoint function of an ROI is the sensitivity of the average dose in the ROI to a unit-strength brachytherapy source at any seed position. The greedy heuristic uses a ratio of target and critical structure adjoint functions to rank seed positions according to their ability to irradiate the target ROI while sparing critical structure ROIs. Because seed positions are ranked in advance and because the greedy heuristic does not modify previously selected seed positions, the greedy heuristic constructs a complete seed configuration quickly. Isodose surface constraints determine the search space and the needle constraint limits the number of needles. This study additionally includes a methodology that scans possible combinations of these constraint values automatically. This automated selection scheme saves the user the effort of manually searching constraint values. With this method, clinically acceptable treatment plans are obtained in less than 2 min. For comparison, the branch-and-bound method used to solve a mixed integer-programming model took close to 2.5 h to arrive at a feasible solution. Both methods achieved good treatment plans, but the speedup provided by the greedy heuristic was a factor of approximately 100. This attribute makes this algorithm suitable for intra-operative real-time treatment planning.

Comparison of MRI-based and CT/MRI fusion–based postimplant dosimetric analysis of prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based and computed tomography (CT)/MRI fusion-based postimplant dosimetry methods in permanent prostate brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between October 2004 and March 2006, a total of 52 consecutive patients with prostate cancer were treated by brachytherapy, and postimplant dosimetry was performed using CT/MRI fusion. The accuracy and reproducibility were prospectively compared between MRI-based dosimetry and CT/MRI fusion-based dosimetry based on the dose-volume histogram (DVH) related parameters as recommended by the American Brachytherapy Society.

RESULTS

The prostate volume was 15.97+/-6.17 cc (mean+/-SD) in MRI-based dosimetry, and 15.97+/-6.02 cc in CT/MRI fusion-based dosimetry without statistical difference. The prostate V100 was 94.5% and 93.0% in MRI-based and CT/MRI fusion-based dosimetry, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.002). The prostate D90 was 119.4% and 114.4% in MRI-based and CT/MRI fusion-based dosimetry, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.004).

CONCLUSION

Our current results suggested that, as with fusion images, MR images allowed accurate contouring of the organs, but they tended to overestimate the analysis of postimplant dosimetry in comparison to CT/MRI fusion images. Although this MRI-based dosimetric discrepancy was negligible, MRI-based dosimetry was acceptable and reproducible in comparison to CT-based dosimetry, because the difference between MRI-based and CT/MRI fusion-based results was smaller than that between CT-based and CT/MRI fusion-based results as previously reported.

Consistency in electronic portal imaging registration in prostate cancer radiation treatment verification

Background

A protocol of electronic portal imaging (EPI) registration for the verification of radiation treatment fields has been implemented at our institution. A template is generated using the reference images, which is then registered with the EPI for treatment verification. This study examines interobserver consistency among trained radiation therapists in the registration and verification of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for patients with prostate cancer.

Materials and methods

20 consecutive patients with prostate cancer undergoing EBRT were analyzed. The EPIs from the initial 10 fractions were registered independently by 6 trained radiation therapist observers. For each fraction, an anterior-posterior (AP or PA) and left lateral (Lat) EPIs were generated and registered with the reference images. Two measures of displacement for the AP EPI in the superior-inferior (SI) and right left (RL) directions and two measures of displacement for the Lat EPI in the AP and SI directions were prospectively recorded. A total of 2400 images and 4800 measures were analyzed. Means and standard deviations, as well as systematic and random errors were calculated for each observer. Differences between observers were compared using the chi-square test. Variance components analysis was used to evaluate how much variance is attributed to the observers. Time trends were estimated using repeated measures analysis.

Results

Inter-observer variation expressed as the standard deviation of the six observers' measurements within each image were 0.7, 1.0, 1.7 and 1.4 mm for APLR, APSI, LatAP and LatSI respectively. Variance components analysis showed that the variation attributed to the observers was small compared to variation due to the images. On repeated measure analysis, time trends were apparent only for the APLR and LatSI measurements. Their magnitude however was small.

Conclusion

No clinically important systematic observer effect or time trends were identified in the registration of EPI by the radiation therapist observers in this study. These findings are useful in the documentation of consistency and reliability in the quality assurance of treatment verification of EBRT for prostate cancer.

Post-implant computed tomography-magnetic resonance prostate image registration using feature line parallelization and normalized mutual information

Post‐implant dosimetry for permanent prostate brachytherapy is typically performed using computed tomography (CT) images, for which the clear visualization of soft tissue structures is problematic. Registration of CT and magnetic resonance (MR) image volumes can improve the definition of all structures of interest (soft tissues, bones, and seeds) in the joint image set. In the present paper, we describe a novel two‐stage rigid‐body registration algorithm that consists of (1) parallelization of straight lines fit to image features running primarily in the superior–inferior (Z) direction, followed by (2) normalized mutual information registration. The first stage serves to fix rotation angles about the anterior–posterior (Y) and left–right (X) directions, and the second stage determines the remaining Z‐axis rotation angle and the X, Y, Z translation values. The new algorithm was applied to CT and 1.5T MR (T2‐weighted and balanced fast‐field echo sequences) axial image sets for three patients acquired four weeks after prostate brachytherapy using I125 seeds. Image features used for the stage 1 parallelization were seed trains in CT and needle tracks and seed voids in MR. Simulated datasets were also created to further investigate algorithm performance. Clinical image volumes were successfully registered using the two‐stage approach to within a root‐mean‐squares (RMS) distance of <1.5 mm, provided that some pubic bone and anterior rectum were included in the registration volume of interest and that no motion artifact was apparent. This level of accuracy is comparable to that obtained for the same clinical datasets using the Procrustes algorithm. Unlike Procrustes, the new algorithm can be almost fully automated, and hence we conclude that its further development for application in post‐implant dosimetry is warranted.

PACS numbers: 87.53.Jw, 87.57.Gg, 87.59.Fm, 87.61.Pk

Effect of edema, relative biological effectiveness, and dose heterogeneity on prostate brachytherapya)

Many factors influence response in low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy of prostate cancer. Among them, edema, relative biological effectiveness (RBE), and dose heterogeneity have not been fully modeled previously. In this work, the generalized linear-quadratic (LQ) model, extended to account for the effects of edema, RBE, and dose heterogeneity, was used to assess these factors and their combination effect. Published clinical data have shown that prostate edema after seed implant has a magnitude (ratio of post- to preimplant volume) of 1.3-2.0 and resolves exponentially with a half-life of 4-25 days over the duration of the implant dose delivery. Based on these parameters and a representative dose-volume histogram (DVH), we investigated the influence of edema on the implant dose distribution. The LQ parameters (alpha=0.15 Gy(-1) and alpha/beta=3.1 Gy) determined in earlier studies were used to calculate the equivalent uniform dose in 2 Gy fractions (EUD2) with respect to three effects: edema, RBE, and dose heterogeneity for 125I and 103Pd implants. The EUD2 analysis shows a negative effect of edema and dose heterogeneity on tumor cell killing because the prostate edema degrades the dose coverage to tumor target. For the representative DVH, the V100 (volume covered by 100% of prescription dose) decreases from 93% to 91% and 86%, and the D90 (dose covering 90% of target volume) decrease from 107% to 102% and 94% of prescription dose for 125I and 103Pd implants, respectively. Conversely, the RBE effect of LDR brachytherapy [versus external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy] enhances dose effect on tumor cell kill. In order to balance the negative effects of edema and dose heterogeneity, the RBE of prostate brachytherapy was determined to be approximately 1.2-1.4 for 125I and 1.3-1.6 for 103Pd implants. These RBE values are consistent with the RBE data published in the literature. These results may explain why in earlier modeling studies, when the effects of edema, dose heterogeneity, and RBE were all ignored simultaneously, prostate LDR brachytherapy was reported to show an overall similar dose effect as EBRT and HDR brachytherapy, which are independent of edema and RBE effects and have a better dose coverage.

Difference in rectal dosimetry between pre-plan and post-implant analysis in transperineal interstitial brachytherapy for prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To investigate differences in rectal dosimetry between pre-plan ultrasonography (US) and post-implant computed tomography (CT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Subjects comprised 49 patients who underwent prostate brachytherapy using (125)I seed implants. Prescribed dose was 145Gy to the periphery of the prostate. Differences in rectal dosimetry between pre-plan US and post-implant CT analysis were evaluated. In addition, patients were divided into two groups according to timing of pre-planning (pre-plan group, n=28; intraoperative pre-plan group, n=21), and differences in rectal dosimetry between groups were assessed.

RESULTS

The average of volume differences between pre-plan and post-implant analysis (pre-plan minus post-implant analysis) for all patients were follows: -0.08 cm(3) in V60 (volume of rectal wall receiving 60% of prescribed dose); -0.05 cm(3) in V70; -0.16 cm(3) in V80; -0.38 cm(3) in V90; -0.40 cm(3) in V100; -0.32 cm(3) in V110; -0.22 cm(3) in V120; -0.15 cm(3) in V130; -0.10 cm(3) in V140; -0.07 cm(3) in V150; and -0.05 cm(3) in V160. Apparent differences between pre-plan US and post-implant CT in rectal dosimetry were small. However, considering the steep curve of the relationship between tolerable volume and dose, a large actual difference should be assumed. No advantage was identified for the intraoperative pre-plan group. Safe volume to avoid proctitis tended to be smaller on ultrasonography than on CT at 1 month.

CONCLUSIONS

The present work shows that direct comparison of CT analysis and pre-plan US is unfavorable due to large differences in these modalities and overestimation of tolerable volume. However, by comprehending the degree of difference, comparison of data from CT analysis with a US pre-plan may be feasible and useful for providing feedback between these modalities.

Comparison of day 0 and day 14 dosimetry for permanent prostate implants using stranded seeds

PURPOSE

To determine, using MRI-based dosimetry (Day 0 and Day 14), whether clinically significant changes in the dose to the prostate and critical adjacent structures occur between Day 0 and 14, and to determine to what degree any changes in dosimetry are due to swelling or its resolution.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 28 patients with a permanent prostate implant using 125I rapid strands were evaluated at Days 0 and 14 by CT/MRI fusion. The minimal dose received by 90% of the target volume (prostate D90), percentage of volume receiving 100% of prescribed minimal peripheral dose (prostate V100), external sphincter D90, and 4-cm3 rectal volume dose were calculated. An acceptable prostate D90 was defined as D90 >90% of prescription dose. Prostate volume changes were calculated and correlated with any dosimetry change. A paradoxic dosimetric result was defined as an improvement in D90, despite increased swelling; a decrease in D90, despite decreased swelling; or a large change in D90 (>30 Gy) in the absence of swelling.

RESULTS

The D90 changed in 27 of 28 patients between Days 0 and 14. No relationship was found between a change in prostate volume and the change in D90 (R2 = 0.01). A paradoxic dosimetric result was noted in 11 of 28 patients. The rectal dose increased in 23 of 28 patients, with a >30-Gy change in 6. The external sphincter D90 increased in 19 of 28, with a >50-Gy increase in 6.

CONCLUSION

The dose to the prostate changed between Days 0 and 14 in most patients, resulting in a change in clinical status (acceptable or unacceptable) in 12 of 28 patients. Profound increases in normal tissue doses may make dose and toxicity correlations using Day 0 dosimetry difficult. No relationship was found between the prostate volume change and D90 change, and, in 11 patients, a paradoxic dosimetric result was noted. A differential z-axis shift of stranded seeds vs. prostate had a greater impact on final dosimetry and dose to critical adjacent tissues than did prostate swelling. These findings challenge the model that swelling is the principal cause of dosimetric changes after implantation. Stranded seeds may have contributed to this outcome. On the basis of these findings, a change in technique to avoid placement of stranded seeds inferior to the prostate apex has been adopted. These results may not apply to implants using single seeds within the prostate.

Ultrasound-Based Localization

Ultrasound is a noninvasive, relatively easy, rapid, and real-time imaging technique for organ targeting for radiotherapy. Its application has been developed to a greater extent in prostate cancer than in other sites in which it has been shown to improve the accuracy of daily treatment delivery. With the move toward dose escalation and the need to maximally spare the adjacent critical structures through more conformal therapy and smaller field margins, an innovative technique for accurate and reproducible tumor targeting is mandatory. Basic ultrasound principles and organ location lend themselves well to the application of this modality in prostate cancer. Promising results using daily ultrasound-guided B-mode acquisition and targeting for patients with upper abdominal tumors suggest an area for additional trials and study. For breast cancer radiotherapy, ultrasound serves to define involved primary and nodal sites, especially in patients in whom surgical evaluation will not be the first therapeutic step.

Individualized planning target volumes for intrafraction motion during hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy boost for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

The objective of the study was to access toxicities of delivering a hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) boost with individualized intrafraction planning target volume (PTV) margins and daily online correction for prostate position.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Phase I involved delivering 42 Gy in 21 fractions using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, followed by a Phase II IMRT boost of 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Digital fluoroscopy was used to measure respiratory-induced motion of implanted fiducial markers within the prostate. Electronic portal images were taken of fiducial marker positions before and after each fraction of radiotherapy during the first 9 days of treatment to calculate intrafraction motion. A uniform 10-mm PTV margin was used for the first phase of treatment. PTV margins for Phase II were patient-specific and were calculated from the respiratory and intrafraction motion data obtained from Phase I. The IMRT boost was delivered with daily online correction of fiducial marker position. Acute toxicity was measured using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, version 2.0.

RESULTS

In 33 patients who had completed treatment, the average PTV margin used during the hypofractionated IMRT boost was 3 mm in the lateral direction, 3 mm in the superior-inferior direction, and 4 mm in the anteroposterior direction. No patients developed acute Grade 3 rectal toxicity. Three patients developed acute Grade 3 urinary frequency and urgency.

CONCLUSIONS

PTV margins can be reduced significantly with daily online correction of prostate position. Delivering a hypofractionated boost with this high-precision IMRT technique resulted in acceptable acute toxicity.

Impact of selection of post-implant technique on dosimetry parameters for permanent prostate implants

PURPOSE

To investigate the variability of prostate implant quality indices between three different methods of calculating the post-implant dose distribution.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In a study of 9 permanent prostate implant patients, post-implant dosimetry was carried out using three methods of identifying seed positions within the prostate volume: (1) prostate volumes defined by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) immediately following implant were registered with shift-film defined seed positions, (2) seeds were identified directly from the post-implant TRUS images, and (3) CT was used to define seed positions and prostate volumes from images acquired at 41-65 days post-implant. For each method, the volume of prostate receiving 90%, 100%, and 150% of the prescribed dose (V90, V100, V150) and the dose delivered to 90% of the prostate volume (D90) were calculated.

RESULTS

Post-implant TRUS volumes were within 15% of the preimplant TRUS volumes in 8 of the 9 patients investigated. The post-implant CT volume was within 15% of the preimplant (TRUS) volume in only 3 of the 9 cases. The value of the dosimetry parameters was dependent on the method used and varied by 5-25% for V90, 5-30% for V100, 42-134% for V150, and 9-60% for D90. No simple relationship was found between change in volume and the resultant change in dosimetry parameter. Differences in dosimetry parameters due to source localization uncertainties was found to be small (< or = 10% for V100) when comparing methods (1) and (2).

CONCLUSIONS

There are many uncertainties in the calculation of parameters that are commonly used to describe the quality of a permanent prostate implant. Differences in the parameters calculated were most likely a result of a combination of factors including uncertainties in delineating the prostate with different imaging modalities, differences in source identification techniques, and intraobserver variability.

MR and CT image fusion for postimplant analysis in permanent prostate seed implants

PURPOSE

To compare the outcome of two different image-based postimplant dosimetry methods in permanent seed implantation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between October 1999 and October 2002, 150 patients with low-risk prostate carcinoma were treated with (125)I and (103)Pd in our institution. A CT-MRI image fusion protocol was used in 21 consecutive patients treated with exclusive brachytherapy. The accuracy and reproducibility of the method was calculated, and then the CT-based dosimetry was compared with the CT-MRI-based dosimetry using the dose-volume histogram (DVH) related parameters recommended by the American Brachytherapy Society and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

RESULTS

Our method for CT-MRI image fusion was accurate and reproducible (median shift <1 mm). Differences in prostate volume were found, depending on the image modality used. Quality assurance DVH-related parameters strongly depended on the image modality (CT vs. CT-MRI): V(100) = 82% vs. 88%, p < 0.05. D(90) = 96% vs. 115%, p < 0.05. Those results depend on the institutional implant technique and reflect the importance of lowering inter- and intraobserver discrepancies when outlining prostate and organs at risk for postimplant dosimetry.

CONCLUSIONS

Computed tomography-MRI fused images allow accurate determination of prostate size, significantly improving the dosimetric evaluation based on DVH analysis. This provides a consistent method to judge a prostate seed implant's quality.

Quality of permanent prostate implants using automated delivery with seedSelectron™ versus manual insertion of RAPID Strands™

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To compare the quality of manually inserted RAPID Strand implants with automatically inserted selectSeed implants using volumetric and dosimetric parameters.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with T1 to T2 prostate carcinoma were treated with brachytherapy. The (125)I seeds were implanted in the prostate in three different ways: manual insertion of RAPID Strands (R); insertion of selectSeeds using the seedSelectron (S); a combination of both techniques: manual insertion of RAPID Strands in the left half of the prostate and insertion of selectSeeds with the seedSelectron in the right half of the prostate (RS). The comparison is based on implant and target specific parameters. The implant specific parameters, V(100), homogeneity index (HI), and natural dose ratio (NDR), were determined at the time of implantation and four weeks later. MR images taken four weeks after the implantation were used for the calculation of the target specific parameters: D(90), HI, external index (EI), and conformation number (CN).

RESULTS

We found no significant difference between the groups of implants (R, S, RS) for the implant specific parameters V(100), HI, and NDR at t(0) and neither at t(4w). For each group, the V(100) values decreased significantly with time between t(0) and t(4w). The target specific parameters D(90), HI, EI and CN were not significantly different between the groups. For the group of patients with both RAPID Strands and selectSeeds, we found a significant difference in D(90) between both halves of the prostate.

CONCLUSIONS

The dosimetry parameters of a newly introduced implant technique using an automatic seed afterloader were not significantly different from the parameters of a manual insertion technique using RAPID Strands. Since either technique has its advantages and disadvantages regarding seed migration, physics quality assurance, efficiency, logistics, and ease of use, it was decided to use both techniques and to continue evaluations.

The impact of technological advances on the evolution of 3D conformal brachytherapy for early prostate cancer

Permanent implantation of I-125 and Pd-103 seeds is one of the widely used treatment options for the early stage prostate cancer with minimum normal tissue complications and long-term local control of the tumor. This is possible because of several technological advances made in the past decade to better understand the procedural aspects of implantations with the desired clinical outcome and with acceptable morbidities. In addition, with the widespread use of PSA testing, more widely disseminated information about prostate cancer and increased patient awareness, over 70% of patients are diagnosed early with localized disease and therefore are candidates for definitive local therapy. Delineation of soft tissue structures including the prostate, rectum, urethra and bladder has become more accurate with the use of imaging modalities including Ultrasound and MRI, with or without the CT. A re-evaluation of the dosimetric parameters of the radioactive sources has lead to a more precise estimate of the dose delivered to the prostate and the associated critical normal structures. Technological improvements in the post implant dosimetry have helped to understand the factors, which makes an implant a "good implant" or a "poor implant". Intraoperative treatment planning with on line dosimetry is emerging as one of the best approaches for prostate brachytherapy. In addition, better software is now available producing dose-volume histograms with 3D target and normal tissue reconstruction. The combination of seed implant followed by IMRT would provide scope for differentially boosting the regions under-dosed because of uncontrollable and unexpected reasons during the implant and unsuspected micro extensions of the tumor.

Interobserver variation in postimplant computed tomography contouring affects quality assessment of prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Permanent seed implants are accepted treatment of early stage prostate cancer. Implant quality is assessed by post implant CT-based dosimetry but prostate contours on CT images are obscured by metallic seed artefact and edema. Outcome depends on implant quality, but perceived implant quality depends on accurate prostate contouring. This study documents inter observer variation in prostate contouring on post implant CT scans.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ten patients had implant dosimetry calculated on 4 copies of the post implant CT scan. Prostate contours from MRI-CT fusion were the gold standard for prostate edge identification. CTs were contoured by an experienced prostate brachytherapist matching CT images to the pre implant TRUS, and by 2 GU radiation oncologists experienced in conformal radiotherapy planning. Dosimetry was compared to that obtained using MRI-CT fusion in terms of D90 and V100.

RESULTS

Contours and dosimetry were not reproducible among the 3 observers. The V100's of the experienced brachytherapist differed from that of MRI-CT fusion by a mean of 2.4% compared to 9.1% and 4.4% for observers 1 and 2, and the D90 by a mean of 9.3 Gy compared to 30.3 and 14.4 Gy for observers 1 and 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Quality assessment of prostate brachytherapy based on 1 month post implant CT is difficult. This may obscure the dose-response relationship in brachytherapy as well as create problems for quality assurance in multicentre trials evaluating brachytherapy against standard modalities. Whenever possible, MRI-CT fusion should be employed to verify prostate contours post implant.

Radioactive seed migration to the chest after transperineal interstitial prostate brachytherapy: extraprostatic seed placement correlates with migration

PURPOSE

To examine the incidence of seed migration detected on chest X-ray and to identify the predictors associated with its occurrence.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between May 1998 and April 2000, 102 patients underwent permanent prostate brachytherapy at our institution and 100 were eligible for the study. Chest X-rays obtained at follow-up were examined for the number and location of seeds. The patient and treatment variables potentially associated with the occurrence and number of seed migrations were analyzed.

RESULTS

One or more seeds were identified on the chest X-rays of 55 (55%) of 100 patients. The mean number of intrathoracic seeds in patients with migration was 2.2 (range, 1-10), and the proportion of seeds that migrated to the thorax was 0.98%. The rate of extraprostatic seeds planned was 43.9%, and postimplant CT identified 37.9% in such a location. The number of seeds planned for extraprostatic placement and below the apex were statistically significant (alpha = 0.05) predictors in univariate logistic analysis. Multivariate analysis revealed the planned number of extraprostatic seeds as the only statistically significant predictor (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Extraprostatic placement of loose seeds is associated with an increased likelihood for, and frequency of, seed migration to the thorax. Nonetheless, the small proportion of implanted seeds that migrated (<or=1%) is highly unlikely to have significant dosimetric consequences.

A method to compare supra-pubic ultrasound and CT images of the prostate: Technique and early clinical results

We describe a unique method that allows the comparison of spatially registered ultrasound (SRUS) images and computed tomography-derived contours (CTDCs) that were acquired with a minimal time lapse. As such, we have a tool that will provide validation of the spatial accuracy of the US system and that will allow comparison of anatomical boundaries derived via the two different imaging modalities. We describe the method by which the commercial US system is mechanically registered to a CT simulator and a unique data processing procedure. This data processing procedure circumvents the standard data acquisition and manual contouring sequence, thus reducing the time lapse from CT to US image acquisition to 10 minutes on average. Verification using a phantom demonstrated the method to be spatially accurate to within +/- 1 mm in the anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral directions and +/- 3 mm in the inferior-superior (IS) direction. Early clinical results gathered on 8 patients demonstrated alignment between the US and the CTDCs to be 0 mm in the AP and lateral directions and 2 mm in the IS direction, on average. The technique was used to compare the appearance of the prostate using US and CT imaging. The lateral dimension of the prostate indicated by the CTDCs was larger than that indicated by US imaging in all cases and on average by 0.9 cm. The height of the prostate in the AP direction was larger on average by 0.3 cm using CTDCs than US, and was larger by 5 mm or more in 3 out of 7 cases. The role of uncertainties in the determination of the CTDCs is examined as a possible cause and implications for treatment planning are described.