Comparison of two strategies for the treatment of radiogenic leukopenia using granulocyte colony stimulating factor

[Use of G-CSF (Neupogen) in multimodal treatment in radiotherapy]

BACKGROUND

Therapy-induced leukopenias with corresponding consequences repeatedly occur in radiotherapy using combined modalities treatment. In radiotherapy, where G-CSF (granulocyte-colony-stimulating-factor) is not licensed, G-CSF has been used successfully under individual circumstances. These results were confirmed in several studies with small patient groups. The aim of this study was to check former results in a larger patient group, to verify postulated side effects and specially to define a cost-effective schedule in the treatment with G-CSF (Neupogen).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this surveillance trial 50, partially previously treated patients with different malignant tumors were treated with G-CSF. According to the probability of a leucocytosis lower than 1000/mm3, G-CSF (Neuropogen) was already given at leukocyte values lower than 2500/mm3 (500/mm3 bis 2450/mm3). It administered subcutaneously every other day, based on body weight until reaching normal leucocyte levels.

RESULTS

In 92% of the patients the increase of leucocytes occurred in the first 24 hours. On average G-CSF was given 4.9 times per patient. Patients without prior therapies or less complex therapies needed less G-CSF applications (3.5 to 5.8 applications). Due to individually varying leucocyte courses the G-CSF therapy was started with leucocyte values between 500/mm3 and 2450/mm3. Patients who were treated with up to 3 G-CSF applications had higher leucocyte levels than those with 4 or more applications (1620/mm3 to 1250/mm3). Leucopenia related infections, therapy interruptions or break-offs did not occur. Besides light "flu like" symptoms in 14% of the patients, no side effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

When a decrease of leucocyte values lower than 1000/mm3 is expected, the most cost-effective treatment is given when starting the interventional G-CSF administration already at leucocyte values around 1600/mm3. Leucopenias can be treated effectively, with little side effects and in a cost-effective way when G-CSF is given on time.

Effect of filgrastim (G-CSF) during chemotherapy and abdomino-pelvic radiation therapy in patients with ovarian carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of filgrastim (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, G-CSF) in reducing neutropenia and treatment interruptions during whole abdominal radiotherapy for ovarian cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Sixteen patients with ovarian cancer treated with 2 to 6 courses of cisplatin-containing chemotherapy and abdomino-pelvic radiation therapy received filgrastim for neutrophil counts <2 x 10(9)/L. Endpoints for analysis included the ability to maintain the neutrophil count in the target range, number of treatment interruptions due to neutropenia, and toxicity attributed to filgrastim.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients received a mean of 2.9 courses of filgrastim (each with a mean duration of 4.1 days), with no treatment interruptions due to neutropenia. The majority of neutrophil counts were maintained above the target range of 2 x 10(9)/L during treatment. Thrombocytopenia requiring treatment interruption was seen in six patients and necessitated platelet transfusions in one. Thrombocytopenia occurred at a mean abdominal radiation dose of 2207 cGy and in all but one patient was preceded by one or more episodes of neutropenia. In comparison with a control group of 31 patients treated without filgrastim there was no reduction in treatment interruptions. Four patients did not complete treatment because of persistent thrombocytopenia yet received a mean of 94% of the planned abdominal radiation dose and 69% of the planned pelvic dose. Filgrastim toxicity was limited to mild skeletal pains in six patients and a Grade 1 skin rash in two patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Filgrastim is safe and effective in preventing neutropenia and reducing neutropenic treatment interruptions during abdominal radiotherapy in patients with ovarian cancer. However, there was no clear benefit to the use of filgrastim as thrombocytopenia became the dose-limiting toxicity resulting in a risk of treatment interruptions and early termination of radiotherapy.

Extended field and total central lymphatic radiotherapy in the treatment of early stage lymph node centroblastic-centrocytic lymphomas: results of a prospective multicenter study. Study Group NHL-frühe Stadien

BACKGROUND

A prospective multicenter trial was performed to evaluate survival, patterns of relapse, and toxicity for clinically staged patients with lymph node centroblastic-centrocytic (cb/cc) lymphomas in Stages I-IIIA after large extended field irradiation (EFI) or total central lymphatic irradiation (TCLI).

METHODS

Between January 1986 and August 1993, 117 adults with clinical Stage I-IIIA lymph node cb/cc lymphoma (Kiel classification) were recruited. Patients in Stages I or II with mediastinal, hilar, periaortic, iliac, or mesenteric involvement and in Stage IIIA received TCLI, whereas patients with more peripherally located cb/cc lymphomas were treated with EFI. TCLI and EFI were administered to a total dose of 26 gray (Gy) with 2 Gy per daily fraction, with the exception of the whole abdomen, which was irradiated to a total dose of 25.5 Gy with 1.5 Gy per fraction. A boost of 10 Gy with 2 Gy per fraction was administered to enlarged and involved lymph nodes at the start of radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Sixty, 40, and 17 patients had Stage I, II, and limited IIIA disease (no bulk and less than 6 involved lymph node regions), respectively. Overall survival was 86% at 5 and 7 years; median follow-up was 68 months. The probabilities of relapse at any site, recurrences in lymph nodes, and in-field lymph node recurrences after TCLI were 17% in Stage I; 56%, 43%, and 40% in Stage II, respectively; and 44%, 35%, and 35% in Stage IIIA, respectively. The risk of disseminated extralymphatic relapses was 9% at 7 years. The most important adverse prognostic factor for in-field lymph node recurrences was a deviation of >20% from the assigned total radiation dose. After EFI, patients in Stage I had a significantly lower risk of recurrences in adjuvant irradiated lymph node regions than in unirradiated lymph node regions. Acute toxicity of EFI and TCLI was moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

In-field lymph node recurrences remained the main risk after TCLI, and a deviation of >20% from the assigned radiation dose was the major risk factor for in-field recurrences. From these data, a total dose of 40-44 Gy in conventional fractionation for the treatment of macroscopic cb/cc lymphomas and 30 Gy for the treatment of subclinical disease is recommended. A randomized study comparing TCLI with EFI is now being organized by this group.