Subdiaphragmatic stage I & II Hodgkin's disease: long-term follow-up and prognostic factors

Outcome of Patients With Early-Stage Infradiaphragmatic Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Comprehensive Analysis From the German Hodgkin Study Group

Purpose The prognostic effect of isolated infradiaphragmatic involvement in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is controversial, and there are little data about patients treated with current therapies. Therefore, we performed a risk factor analysis to focus on isolated nodal infradiaphragmatic disease in patients treated within the German Hodgkin Study Group trials HD13 (clinical trial information: ISRCTN63474366) and HD14 (clinical trial information: ISRCTN04761296) for early-stage HL. Patients and Methods Characteristics and outcomes of patients who had infradiaphragmatic HL were compared with patients who had supradiaphragmatic disease. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated according to Kaplan-Meier methods and were compared between groups using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression, which was also applied for multivariable analyses that adjusted for relevant baseline characteristics. Results Of 2,903 qualified patients, 223 (7.7%) were diagnosed with isolated nodal infradiaphragmatic disease. In general, these patients were older, had a poorer performance status, were more often male, and had the nodular sclerosis subtype less often than those with supradiaphragmatic disease. After a median follow-up time of 51 months, PFS and OS were significantly worse in patients with infradiaphragmatic disease (5-year PFS and OS, 80.1% and 91.5% v 91.2% and 97.6% in patients with supradiaphragmatic disease; each P < .001). In multivariable analyses, infradiaphragmatic HL remained a significant risk factor in terms of PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.5; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.2; P = .03) and OS (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2 to 3.5; P = .01). However, inferior PFS and OS could not be observed among those patients treated with the more intensive chemotherapy (two cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine [ABVD] in HD13, and two cycles of escalated bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone [BEACOPP_escalated] plus two cycles of ABVD in HD14; all patients received 30 Gy of involved-field radiotherapy). Conclusion Early-stage HL that presents with infradiaphragmatic disease only represents a distinct patient group with an inferior outcome. However, this adverse outcome can be outweighed by appropriate combined modality treatment.

Bulky Pelvic Hodgkin Lymphoma in a Prepubertal Girl

Pure infra-diaphragmatic presentation is rare in pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Isolated pelvic presentation is restricted to case reports in adults. We describe a unique presentation of HL as a primary pelvic disease in an 11-year-old prepubertal girl. She was treated based on the Euronet-Paediatric Hodgkin's Lymphoma Group protocol (EuroNet-PHL-C1) recommendations and assigned to treatment Group 2 (Stage IIB). The patient had bulky disease and a suboptimal response on interim 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. The child was administered chemotherapy alone. Pelvic radiotherapy was consciously avoided due to the high risk of gonadal failure. She remains disease-free for 18 months now. Treatment of pediatric HL necessitates a delicate balance between achieving cure as well as avoiding serious late effects of therapy.

Infradiaphragmatic Hodgkin lymphoma: a large series of patients staged with PET-CT

Introduction

Infradiaphragmatic Hodgkin Lymphoma (IDHL) accounts for 3-11% of adult cases of stage I-II Hodgkin Lymphoma and the treatment strategy in IDHL is still heterogeneous. All previous published studies were conducted before the PET-CT era. PET may provide a more accurate evaluation of IDHL stage. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical and biological characteristics of IDHL patients staged by CT scan or PET-CT in eight French hematology departments and their impact on outcomes in these patients.

Methods

Baseline clinical and biological data and outcomes in patients with a first diagnosis of stage I-II IDHL treated with ABVD +/- radiotherapy were retrospectively collected.

Results

Among the 99 patients included, 65 (66%) were staged with PET-CT. These patients were older (53 years vs 46 years, p=0.043), had lower ESR (27 vs 58mm, p=0.022), higher hemoglobin level (13.6 vs 12.8g/dL, p=0.015), less frequent Ann Arbor stage II (74% vs 91%) and less central adenopathy involvement (60% vs 82%, p=0.024). Treatment was chemotherapy alone in 55% of patients and the remaining patients received chemo-radiotherapy (CRT). Five-year PFS and OS rates in PET-CT-staged patients were 78% (95% CI 64-87) and 88% (95% CI 73-95), respectively, compared with 65% (p=0.225) and 82% (p=0.352) in CT-staged patients. The CRT strategy was associated with fewer relapses (p=0.027).

Conclusion

This study showed that the characteristics of CT-staged IDHL patients were less favorable than those of PET-CT-staged patients and indicated that CRT provided better PFS than did chemotherapy alone.

Cardiac complications after radical radiotherapy

Improvements in cancer therapy have led to increasing numbers of cancer survivors, and the long-term complications of these treatments are now becoming apparent. This article presents the current knowledge of adverse cardiovascular effects of radiotherapy to the chest. Medline literature searches relating to the cardiac complications of radiotherapy and subsequent prognosis were conducted. Potential adverse effects of mediastinal irradiation are numerous and can include coronary artery disease, pericarditis, cardiomyopathy, and valvular disease. Damage seems to be related to radiation dose, volume of irradiated heart, age at exposure, technique of chest irradiation, and patient-specific factors. The advent of technology and the newer sophisticated techniques in treatment planning and delivery are expected to decrease the incidence of cardiovascular diseases after radiation of the mediastinal structures. In any case, patients subjected to irradiation of the mediastinal structures require close multidisciplinary clinical monitoring.

Guidelines and Recommendations for the Management of Anaemia in Patients with Lymphoid Malignancies

Patients with lymphoid malignancies frequently require repetitive and intensive anticancer treatments to induce and maintain disease remission. Anaemia (haemoglobin [Hb] <12 g/dL) is a common and debilitating problem associated with both the malignancy itself and its treatment burden. Anaemia negatively impacts on all aspects of patient quality of life (QOL) and treatment outcomes and survival, particularly in this disease setting. Widely acknowledged goals of anaemia treatment include Hb correction to approximately 12 g/dL, reduction in transfusion requirements and optimisation of patient QOL. Since the introduction of recombinant human erythropoietic therapy, transfusion (once the only anaemia treatment option available) is now primarily reserved for non-responders or those with severe or life-threatening anaemia. Data from randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies, and large, non-randomised, open-label, community-based studies, along with almost 15 years of practical experience, support the assertion that epoetin alfa administered at a dosage of 150-300 U/kg three times weekly or 40,000-60,000U once weekly, both of which are US FDA-approved dose administration schedules, can effectively and safely achieve anaemia treatment goals for the majority of patients with lymphoid malignancies. Data and practical experience collected over the last 5 years on another erythropoietic agent with a slightly longer half-life but lower binding affinity, darbepoetin alfa, show that this agent when administered according to the FDA-approved dose administration schedules (2.25-4.5 microg/kg once weekly or 500microg once every 3 weeks) or according to a commonly-administered dose in clinical practice (3.0-5.0 microg/kg once every 2 weeks) can also effectively and safely correct anaemia, reduce transfusion requirements and improve QOL in many patients with lymphoid malignancies. One comparative head-to-head trial suggested that epoetin alfa might be superior to darbepoetin alfa in anaemic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy with respect to timing and magnitude of Hb correction, although further study is necessary, especially concerning optimal dose administration. Alternative dose administration schedules, such as epoetin alfa 80,000U every 2 weeks from initiation or 80,000U every 3 weeks following initiation with once weekly administration and darbepoetin alfa 4.5 microg/kg every 3 weeks following initiation with once weekly administration, are being actively investigated with the goal of increased flexibility for patients and healthcare providers. The treatment of anaemia in patients with lymphoid malignancies is an important part of overall disease management, as evidenced by continuous investigation of existing erythropoietic agents and new agents. Although treatment guidelines issued by organisations such as the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and American Society of Hematology (ASH)/American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) suggest intervention with erythropoietic therapy when Hb falls below 10-11 g/dL or based on clinical symptoms, data suggest that anaemia is vastly under-recognised and under-treated. Clearly, an update on the definition, identification and optimal management of anaemia in patients with lymphoid malignancies is warranted.

Evaluation of anaemia in patients with multiple myeloma and lymphoma: findings of the European CANCER ANAEMIA SURVEY

OBJECTIVES

Until recently, no prospective epidemiologic survey of lymphoma and multiple myeloma (L/MM) in European cancer patients had been conducted; furthermore, data on prevalence, incidence, and treatment patterns of L/MM were limited or unavailable. Here we define anemia prevalence, incidence, and treatment patterns, and identify anemia risk factors in European L/MM patients.

METHODS

Data for a subgroup of 2360 L/MM patients in the European Cancer Anaemia Survey (ECAS) were analyzed; variables included age, gender, tumor type/stage, cancer and anemia treatment, WHO performance status, and hemoglobin (Hb) levels.

RESULTS

2316 patients were evaluable (1612 L and 704 MM). Anemia rate at enrollment was 52.5%. At enrollment, Hb levels correlated significantly with WHO scores (r = -0.306, P < 0.001). Anemia prevalence during ECAS was 72.9% (MM, 85.3%; non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, 77.9%; Hodgkin's disease, 57.4%); incidence in chemotherapy patients was 55.4%. Only 47.3% of patients anemic any time during ECAS received anemia treatment; overall Hb nadir for initiating treatment was 8.9 g/dL (epoetin, 9.5 g/dL; transfusion, 8.2 g/dL). Factors found to significantly (P < 0.03) increase anemia risk were low initial Hb, female gender, persistent/resistant disease, and platinum chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

L/MM patients have a high prevalence and incidence of anemia; however, anemia is not optimally treated. Anemia is common in L/MM patients and, given its known adverse impact on physical functioning and quality-of-life variables including fatigue and cognitive function, anemia management should be an integral part of their care. Predictive factors identified by ECAS may help clinicians develop optimal anemia treatment strategies for L/MM patients.

Evolving role of radiation therapy for hematologic malignancies

Radiation therapy continues to play a paramount role in the therapy of hematologic malignancies, whether as definitive therapy, as consolidation after chemotherapy, as part of bone marrow transplantation protocols, or in palliation. During the past 2 decades, significant advances in radiation therapy have occurred, including the evolution of involved-field irradiation and the adoption of conformal radiation administration. It is hoped that modern techniques will reduce the long-term sequelae associated with radiation-based treatments.

rHuEPO and Treatment Outcomes: the Clinical Experience

Increasingly, anemia is being recognized as a negative prognostic and predictive factor for patients undergoing chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or a combination of these treatment modalities. The results of clinical studies have shown correlations between anemia and shorter survival times in patients with a wide variety of solid tumors and hematologic malignancies, including lung, ovarian, breast, and head/neck cancers, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease, Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Also, anemia has been shown to predict treatment response in patients with ovarian, cervical, and urothelial cancers, mantle cell lymphoma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia, as well as refractory/relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia. Based on the presumed causal relationship between anemia and poor patient outcome, several studies have examined the influence of epoetin alfa (a recombinant human erythropoietin) on outcomes in anemic patients undergoing cancer treatment. The results of these studies have been encouraging, with indications of greater locoregional tumor control and higher response rates in epoetin alfa-treated patients. Additionally, epoetin alfa therapy, by correcting anemia, has been shown to improve a patient's energy level, ability to perform daily activities, and overall quality of life (QOL). Such effects not only enhance a patient's general well-being, but may also increase their tolerance of, and willingness to undergo, full courses of their cancer therapy in a timely manner. These findings support the use of epoetin alfa to achieve gains in QOL and cancer treatment outcomes in anemic cancer patients and suggest that additional studies be conducted to further investigate the potential benefits of this agent in regard to improved outcomes.

A Consensus Protocol: Image-improved Therapeutic Guidelines for Limited Adult Hodgkin's Disease

Hodgkin's disease (HD) has greatly benefited from new technologies in terms of less invasive and more accurate staging as well as improved overall and relapse-free survival. However, the likelihood of late adverse effects of treatment, including second tumors, has increased due to the longer survival of patients with HD. Today's trend is to aim at minimal therapeutic exposure while guaranteeing lower therapy-related morbidity. This encourages new research efforts but also leads to less uniformity in treatments, as observed in the Veneto Region in Italy. The Gruppo Veneto Linfomi, composed of representatives of Radiotherapy and Oncology Departments of the Veneto Region, has been analyzing this problem and proposing therapy guidelines since 1995. A set of 10 prognostic factors has been developed to identify three prognostic groups: highly favorable (HF) are patients up to 40 years of age presenting with stage I disease involving only one site of disease with a maximum tumor diameter (TD) of 5 cm and no adverse factors. In this group only mantle field irradiation is recommended if the disease is located in the neck or above, inverted-Y irradiation is recommended for distal subdiaphragmatic lesions, and subtotal nodal irradiation in all other cases. HF cases may also be treated like favorable cases with limited chemoradiation. Favorable (F) cases are patients in stage I with a TD greater than 5 cm and smaller than 10 cm or stage II, up to three sites of disease and negative prognostic factors for systemic disease. All other patients are included in the “not favorable” (NF) group at Ann Arbor stage I or II with any adverse prognostic factor. For the latter two groups, chemotherapy with the ABVD or Stanford V regimen precedes involved-field radiotherapy to sites with a TD of at least 5 cm. The total irradiation dose is determined by local disease extent and level of response to chemotherapy. Images on which the radiation fields are drawn serve as an important reference to improve the homogeneity of treatments. This protocol includes a list of adverse treatment effects (chemo- and/or radiotherapy) together with follow-up guidelines for the early detection of secondary cancers in previously irradiated patients.

Epoetin alfa corrects anemia and improves quality of life in patients with hematologic malignancies receiving non-platinum chemotherapy

Anemia, a commonly occurring morbidity in patients with cancer, often leads to diminished quality of life (QOL). Numerous clinical trials have shown that epoetin alfa treatment improves hematologic and QOL variables in cancer patients. The clinical trial analysis reported here was performed to assess response to epoetin alfa in patients with hematologic malignancies. Cancer patients with anemia undergoing non-platinum-based chemotherapy who were enrolled in a multinational, randomized (2:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled trial were prospectively stratified by tumor type (hematologic, solid). Efficacy endpoints included proportion of patients transfused after day 28; change in hemoglobin (Hb) level from baseline to last assessment; proportion of treatment responders (increase in Hb > or =2 g/dl unrelated to transfusion) and correctors (patients whose Hb levels reached > or =12 g/dl during the study); and QOL. The protocol was amended before unblinding to prospectively collect and assess survival data 12 months after the last patient completed the study, and survival for the full study cohort was estimated using Kaplan-Meier techniques. Efficacy analyses of hematologic and QOL variables, as well as Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival, were performed post hoc for the hematologic tumor stratum. Among patients with hematologic malignancies, the mean increase in Hb levels was greater with epoetin alfa than with placebo treatment (2.2 vs. 0.3 g/dl). Transfusion requirements were lower in patients who received epoetin alfa versus placebo (25.2 vs. 43.1%), and the proportion of responders and correctors was higher with epoetin alfa than with placebo (75.2 vs. 16.7% and 72.6 vs. 14.8%, respectively). Patients who received epoetin alfa had improved QOL while patients who received placebo had decreased QOL. These results are similar to those seen in the full study cohort, where differences between epoetin alfa and placebo were significant (P<0.05) for all five primary cancer- and anemia-specific QOL domains evaluated. Although the study was not powered for survival, Kaplan-Meier estimates showed a trend in overall survival favoring epoetin alfa in both the full study cohort and the hematologic subgroup. Epoetin alfa treatment was well tolerated. Epoetin alfa therapy increased Hb levels, reduced transfusion requirements, and improved QOL in patients with anemia undergoing non-platinum chemotherapy for hematologic malignancies.

Impact of haemoglobin levels on the outcome of cancers treated with chemotherapy

Anaemia is the most frequently observed haematological abnormality faced by cancer patients. Yet, its impact on tumour biology is not well understood. Several recent retrospective clinical studies showed that anaemia is not only a negative prognostic factor but also, in some situations, a negative predictive parameter in chemotherapy-treated patients with solid tumours or haematological malignancies. These include lymphomas, leukaemias, non-small-cell lung cancer, ovarian cancer, cervical cancer, urothelial and renal cancers, and head and neck carcinoma. The basis for the impact of anaemia on prognosis or outcome of chemotherapy is complex. In vitro and animal models have shown that cellular hypoxia, the consequence of anaemia, may provide a selection pressure for tumour cells with higher rates of mutation, which may ultimately result in increased metastatic potential, increased cellular growth, therapy resistance, and decreased apoptotic potential. There is also evidence to indicate that the anaemia itself may induce a feedback mechanism that results in angiogenesis. Finally, the effect of anaemia on the pharmacokinetics of cytostatics may be an underestimated parameter for therapeutic outcome. The treatment of anaemia in patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy may improve outcome in terms of both response rate to treatment and survival.

Stage I-III Hodgkin's disease: outcome and pattern of failure following treatment with radiation therapy and chemotherapy in a modern era

PURPOSE

To analyse the long term outcome, pattern of failure and treatment related complications after radiation therapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy for stage I-III Hodgkin's disease (HD).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Detailed records from 86 patients with stage I-III HD treated between 1989 and 1998, were retrospectively reviewed. Seventeen patients with favourable stage I-IIA were treated with RT alone, and the remaining 69 patients with combined modality treatment (CMT). Patients treated with RT received extended-field or subtotal nodal irradiation (STNI) to a total dose of 36-54 Gy, and patients with CMT, received involved-field irradiation to a lower doses, 26-40 Gy. The median follow-up time was 50 months (range 16-180).

RESULTS

The 10-year overall survival (OS) for the whole group was 96% (SE 2%), 100% for stage I, 95% for stage II and 100% for stage III patients. Of potential prognostic factors analysed for statistical significance, only the response to chemotherapy (p=0.0393) was found to influence significantly OS rates. Twelve patients (13.9%) relapsed. Salvage treatment was effective in 10 of the 12 relapsed patients. The 10-year freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) was 79% (SE 6%). Although 8 (9.6%) of the 83 surviving patients developed late effects that could represent toxicity from the treatment, no patient died of late complications.

CONCLUSIONS

RT alone for favourable early stage HD attains good survival rates with a modest treatment related morbidity. For patients with unfavourable stage II and stage III HD, CMT with limited RT provides a good to excellent prognosis.

The need for long-term surveillance for patients treated with curative radiotherapy for Hodgkin's disease: University of Minnesota experience

PURPOSE

To examine the long-term outcome of Stage I, II, and III patients treated with curative radiotherapy for Hodgkin's disease at the University of Minnesota Hospital, with particular focus on long-term treatment-related complications and the need for long-term surveillance after treatment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 210 Stage I, II, and III patients (98 female, 112 male) treated at the University of Minnesota since 1970 were included in this study. All patients were laparotomy staged. Between 1970 and 1974, 35 high-risk patients (i.e., patients with large mediastinal mass, and/or hilar disease, and/or splenic involvement) and 40 low-risk patients were treated with standard field radiotherapy. From 1975 on, 67 high-risk patients received radical radiotherapy because of poor outcomes with standard radiotherapy, and 68 low-risk patients received standard radiotherapy. Salvage chemotherapy was given to 62 patients who recurred. Median follow-up for all patients was 15.6 years (range 0. 35-26.5 years). Long-term complications after treatment were assessed using standardized incidence ratios (SIR) and mortality ratios (SMR), with particular focus on cardiac complications and secondary malignancies.

RESULTS

By study end, 70% of the patients are alive and 70% had never recurred. Complications included 33 second malignancies and 75 cardiovascular events. Patients treated for Hodgkin's disease had about 7 times the risk of dying from cardiac problems (SMR = 7.2) and 10 times the risk of dying from a second malignancy (SMR = 10.3) compared to the general population. In terms of absolute risk, Hodgkin's disease would cause seven additional deaths from secondary malignancies per year among 1000 patients and four additional deaths from cardiac problems.

CONCLUSION

Hodgkin's disease patients treated successfully with radiotherapy are at an increased risk for developing long-term treatment-related cardiac disease and/or second malignancies. Careful monitoring of these patients is essential to manage morbidity and minimize mortality from these complications. Suggestions for the establishment of worldwide surveillance programs for these patients are proposed.

Apoptosis and radiosensitization of hodgkin cells by proteasome inhibition

PURPOSE

Malignant cells from Hodgkin's disease have been reported to be defective in regulation of NF-kappaB activity. Ionizing radiation is known to activate NF-kappaB, and it has been suggested that this pathway may protect cells from apoptosis following exposure to radiation and other therapeutic agents. Defective NF-kappaB regulation in Hodgkin cells could therefore dictate the response of this disease to therapy, as well as be responsible for maintaining the malignant phenotype. The purpose of this study was to explore whether NF-kappaB activity could be modulated in Hodgkin cells and whether it determines the response of these cells to treatment with ionizing radiation and/or dexamethasone.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Activation of NF-kappaB in cells is accomplished in large part by degradation of its inhibitor IkappaB through the 26s proteasome. HD-My-Z Hodgkin cells were treated with the proteasome inhibitor MG-132 or transduced with a dominant negative super-repressor IkappaBalpha. Clonogenic survival, apoptosis, proteasome activity, and NF-kappaB binding activity were monitored in response to ionizing radiation and/or dexamethasone treatment.

RESULTS

HD-My-Z Hodgkin cells had modest NF-kappaB levels but, unlike other cell types, did not decrease their level of constitutively active NF-kappaB in response to proteasome inhibition with MG-132. In contrast, transduction with a non-phosphorable IkappaBalpha construct abolished expression. MG-132 did, however, induce apoptosis in HD-My-Z cells and sensitized them to ionizing radiation. Dexamethasone treatment had no effect on NF-kappaB activity or clonogenic survival of Hodgkin cells, but protected them from irradiation.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that inhibition of 26s proteasome activity can induce apoptosis in HD-My-Z Hodgkin cells and radiosensitize them, in spite of the fact that their constitutively active NF-kappaB levels are unaltered. The proteasome may be a promising new therapeutic target for intervention in this disease. In contrast, the use of glucocorticoids in conjunction with radiation treatment for this tumor may require re-evaluation.