Five year results of LINAC radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: outcome for large AVMS

Arteriovenous malformations treated by stereotactic radiosurgery - Review of an Australian single centre's experience

Linear accelerator (LINAC) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a specialised treatment used for various brain conditions, including arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). This paper investigates the obliteration rate of AVMs treated by the LINAC-based facility at Prince of Wales Hospital, defines factors influencing obliteration rate, time to obliteration and complications post-SRS. A retrospective audit review of patient notes sourced from electronic medical records was conducted. During the study period 219 patients received treatment, of which the final status of 136 AVMs was known. Overall obliteration rate was 75.7 %, with obliteration rates of 5 %, 30 % and 46 % at one, three and four years, respectively. Post analysis, a radiosurgery dose of ≥ 18 Gray (Gy) was predictive of achieving obliteration (Odds Ratio (OR) 4.2, 95 % Confidence Interval (CI) 1.61-10.83, p = 0.003) whilst a nidus size of 3-6 cm was less likely of achieving obliteration (OR 0.2, CI 0.10-0.57, p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed a radiosurgery dose of ≥ 18 Gy remained predictive (OR 4.7, CI 1.69-13.25, p = 0.003) and a nidus size of 3-6 cm remained less likely to achieve obliteration (OR 0.2, CI 0.10-0.57, p = 0.001). Females were predictive of developing temporary complications post-SRS in multivariate analysis (OR 2.8, CI 1.24-6.13, p = 0.013), and having > 1 SRS session was predictive of developing permanent complications post-SRS (OR 7.1, CI 2.44-20.53, p < 0.001). The obliteration rate achieved from our study and the predictive nature to achieve obliteration with a radiosurgery dose of ≥ 18 Gy is comparable to existing literature including that using the Gamma-Knife system.

The role of procedural factors on the outcomes of embolization followed by radiosurgery for the treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations: systematic review and proportional meta-analyses

BACKGROUND

Multimodal therapy for brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVM) with embolization followed by stereotactic radiosurgery (E + SRS) has shown varying outcomes. Its benefits over other treatment modalities have been questioned. The goal of this systematic review was to determine the factors associated with cure and complication rates of this treatment strategy.

METHODS

A literature search in Medline and Global Index Medicus, from inception to October 2023, was performed. Studies reporting relevant outcome data from bAVM patients treated with E + SRS were included. Data on several patient, lesion and procedure-related factors were collected. Embolization intent was classified as Targeted (of high-risk features), Devascularizing (feeder embolization/flow reduction) and Occluding (intent-to-cure, nidus embolization). The primary outcome was obliteration rate. Secondary outcomes were post-SRS bleeding (PSB), post-embolization neurological complications (PENC) and post-SRS neurological complications (PSNC). Subgroup analyses included embolic agent, embolization intent and radiosurgery type. Proportional meta-analyses and meta-regressions were performed.

RESULTS

Forty-one studies were included in the review. The pooled obliteration rate was 56.45% (95% CI 50.94 to 61.88). Meta-regression analyses showed higher obliteration rates with Copolymers and lower obliteration rates with Devascularizing embolization. The pooled PSB, PENC and PSNC rates were 5.50%, 13.75% and 5.02%, respectively. Meta-regression analyses showed higher rates of PSB, PENC and PSNC with Devascularizing embolization, Liquid & Solid embolic agents and Targeted & Devascularizing intent, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Embolic agent and embolization intent were procedural factors associated with treatment outcomes of E + SRS in the management of bAVM patients. The efficacy and safety profiles favor copolymers as embolic agents and disfavor Devascularizing as embolization intent.

STUDY REGISTRATION

The protocol of the systematic review was registered in PROSPERO as CRD42023474171.

Considerations for the Use of Stereotactic Radiosurgery to Treat Large Arteriovenous Malformations

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective treatment strategy for cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). Aggressive treatment achieving complete obliteration is necessary to prevent further intracranial hemorrhage and neurological deficits. However, SRS treatment of large AVMs (>10 cm3) is challenging. To prevent toxicity in the normal brain tissue, it is imperative to reduce the radiation dose as the lesion volume increases; however, this also reduces the rate of obliteration. In this study, we review the various radiosurgical approaches for treating large AVMs and their outcomes, and suggest ways to improve treatment outcomes during SRS for large AVMs.

Prediction of Obliteration After the Gamma Knife Radiosurgery of Arteriovenous Malformations Using Hand-Crafted Radiomics and Deep-Learning Methods

INTRODUCTION

Brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) are vascular abnormalities that can be treated with embolization or radiotherapy to prevent the risk of future rupture. In this study, we use hand-crafted radiomics and deep learning techniques to predict favorable vs. unfavorable outcomes following Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) of bAVMs and compare their prediction performances.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-six patients seen at one academic medical center for GKRS obliteration of bAVMs over 15 years were retrospectively reviewed. Forty-two patients met the inclusion criteria. Favorable outcomes were defined as complete nidus obliteration demonstrated on cerebral angiogram and asymptomatic recovery. Unfavorable outcomes were defined as incomplete obliteration or complications relating to the AVM that developed after GKRS. Outcome predictions were made using a random forest model with hand-crafted radiomic features and a fine-tuned ResNet-34 convolutional neural network (CNN) model. The performance was evaluated by using a ten-fold cross-validation technique.

RESULTS

The average accuracy and area-under-curve (AUC) values of the Random Forest Classifier (RFC) with radiomics features were 68.5 ±9.80% and 0.705 ±0.086, whereas those of the ResNet-34 model were 60.0 ±11.9% and 0.694 ±0.124. Four radiomics features used with RFC discriminated unfavorable response cases from favorable response cases with statistical significance. When cropped images were used with ResNet-34, the accuracy and AUC decreased to 59.3 ± 14.2% and 55.4 ±10.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A hand-crafted radiomics model and a pre-trained CNN model can be fine-tuned on pre-treatment MRI scans to predict clinical outcomes of AVM patients undergoing GKRS with equivalent prediction performance. The outcome predictions are promising but require further external validation on more patients.

Radiosurgery With Prior Embolization Versus Radiosurgery Alone for Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The addition of adjuvant embolization to radiosurgery has been proposed as a means of improving treatment outcomes of intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). However, the relative efficacy and safety of radiosurgery with adjuvant embolization vs radiosurgery alone remain uncertain. Moreover, previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have included a limited number of studies and did not consider the effects of baseline characteristics, including AVM volume, on the outcomes. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of preradiosurgery embolization for intracranial AVMs with consideration to matching status between participants in each treatment group.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, up to January 2023. All studies evaluating the utilization of preradiosurgery embolization were included.

RESULTS

A total of 70 studies (9 matched and 71 unmatched) with a total of 12 088 patients were included. The mean age of the included patients was 32.41 years, and 48.91% of the patients were female. Preradiosurgery embolization was used for larger AVMs and patients with previous hemorrhage ( P < .01, P = .02, respectively). The obliteration rate for preradiosurgery embolization (49.44%) was lower compared with radiosurgery alone (61.42%, odds ratio = 0.56, P < .01), regardless of the matching status of the analyzed studies. Although prior embolization was associated higher rate of cyst formation ( P = .04), it lowered the odds of radiation-induced changes ( P = .04). The risks of minor and major neurological deficits, postradiosurgery hemorrhage, and mortality were comparable between groups.

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence that although preradiosurgery embolization is a suitable option to reduce the AVM size for future radiosurgical interventions, it may not be useful for same-sized AVMs eligible for radiosurgery. Utilization of preradiosurgery embolization in suitable lesions for radiosurgery may result in the added cost and burden of an endovascular procedure.

Quantitative Analysis of Parenchymal Effects and Flow of Large Arteriovenous Malformations Managed With Stereotactic Radiosurgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of larger arteriovenous malformations (AVM) is associated with an elevated incidence of adverse radiation effects (ARE). To date, volume-response and dose-response models have been used to predict such effects. To understand radiological outcomes and their hemodynamic effects on the regional brain.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted at our institution using a prospective registry of patients managed between 2014 and 2020. We included patients with AVM with a nidus larger than 5 cc who received either single-session or volume-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery. AVM volume changes, volumes of parenchymal response, and obliteration were analyzed and correlated with transit times and diameters of feeding arteries and draining veins.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients underwent single-session SRS, and 9 patients underwent volume-staged SRS. The average AVM volume was 12.6 cc (5.5-23). The AVM locations were predominantly lobar (80%) and 17 (68%) were in critical locations. The mean margin dose was 17.2 Gy (15-21), and the median V12Gy was 25.5 cc. Fourteen (56%) AVMs had a transit time shorter than 1 second. The median vein-artery ratio (sum diameter of the veins/sum diameter of feeding arteries) was 1.63 (range, 0.60-4.19). Asymptomatic parenchymal effects were detected in 13 (52%) patients and were symptomatic in 4 (16%) patients. The median time to ARE was 12 months (95% CI 7.6-16.4). On univariate analysis, significant predictors of ARE were lower vein-artery ratio ( P = .024), longer transit time ( P = .05), higher mean dose ( P = .028), and higher D95 ( P = .036).

CONCLUSION

Transit times and vessel diameters are valuable predictors of the subsequent parenchymal response after SRS. A more quantitative understanding of blood flow is critical for predicting the effects on the regional brain after AVM radiosurgery.

Patient Selection in a Pragmatic Study on the Management of Patients with Brain Arteriovenous Malformations

BACKGROUND

The Treatment of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations Study (TOBAS) is an all-inclusive pragmatic study comprising 2 randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Patients excluded from the RCTs are followed in parallel treatment and observation registries, allowing a comparison between RCT and registry patients.

METHODS

The first randomized clinical trial (RCT-1) offers 1:1 randomized allocation of intervention versus conservative management for patients with arteriovenous malformation (AVM). The second randomized clinical trial (RCT-2) allocates 1:1 pre-embolization or no pre-embolization to surgery or radiosurgery patients judged treatable with or without embolization. Characteristics of RCT patients are reported and compared to registry patients.

RESULTS

From June 2014 to May 2021, 1010 patients with AVM were recruited; 498 patients were observed and 373 were included in the treatment registries. Randomized allocation in RCT-1 was applied to 139 (26%) of the 512 patients (including 127 of 222 [57%] with unruptured AVMs) considered for curative treatment. RCT-1 AVM patients differed (in rupture status, Spetzler-Martin grade and baseline modified Rankin Score) from those in the observation or treatment registries (P < 0.001). Most patients had small (<3 cm; 71%) low-grade (Spetzler-Martin I-II; 64%) unruptured (91%) AVMs. The allocated management was conservative (n = 71) or curative (n = 68), using surgery (n = 39), embolization (n = 16), or stereotactic radiosurgery (n = 13). Pre-embolization was considered for 179/309 (58%) patients allocated/assigned to surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery; 87/179 (49%) were included in RCT-2. RCT-2 patient AVMs differed in size, eloquence and grade from patients of the pre-embolization registry (P < 0.01). Most had small (<3 cm in 82%) low-grade (83%) AVMs in non-eloquent brain (64%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients included in the RCTs differ significantly from registry patients. Meaningful results can be obtained if multiple centers actively participate in the TOBAS RCTs.

The Era of Onyx Embolization: A Systematic and Literature Review of Preoperative Embolization Before Stereotactic Radiosurgery for the Management of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations

INTRODUCTION

The current treatment paradigm for intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) focuses on reducing the risk of intracranial hemorrhage using various therapeutic means including embolization, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and microsurgical resection. To improve AVM obliteration rates with SRS, pre-radiosurgical embolization has been trialed in a number of studies to reduce the volume of the AVM nidus prior to radiosurgery. This study aimed to review the efficacy of pre-radiosurgical embolization in the pre-Onyx era compared to the current Onyx era.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using PubMed to identify studies with 20 or more AVM patients, embolization material, and obliteration rates for both embolization + stereotactic radiosurgery (E+SRS) and SRS-only groups.

RESULTS

Seventeen articles consisting of 1133 eligible patients were included in this study. A total of 914 (80.7%) patients underwent embolization prior to SRS. Onyx was used as the embolysate in 340 (37.2%) patients in the E+SRS cohorts. Mean obliteration rate for the embolized cohort was 46.9% versus 46.5% in the SRS-only cohort. When comparing obliteration rates based on embolysate material, obliteration rate was 42.1% with Onyx+SRS and 50.0% in the non-Onyx embolysate + SRS cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Onyx (ethylene vinyl-alcohol copolymer dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide and suspended in micronized tantalum powder) has been increasingly used for the embolization of intracranial AVMs with increased success regarding its ease of use from a technical standpoint and performs similarly to other embolysate materials.

Dosimetric Impact of Lesion Number, Size, and Volume on Mean Brain Dose with Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Multiple Brain Metastases

We evaluated the effect of lesion number and volume for brain metastasis treated with SRS using GammaKnife^® ICON™ (GK) and CyberKnife^® M6™ (CK). Four sets of lesion sizes (<5 mm, 5-10 mm, >10-15 mm, and >15 mm) were contoured and prescribed a dose of 20 Gy/1 fraction. The number of lesions was increased until a threshold mean brain dose of 8 Gy was reached; then individually optimized to achieve maximum conformity. Across GK plans, mean brain dose was linearly proportional to the number of lesions and total GTV for all sizes. The numbers of lesions needed to reach this threshold for GK were 177, 57, 29, and 10 for each size group, respectively; corresponding total GTVs were 3.62 cc, 20.37 cc, 30.25 cc, and 57.96 cc, respectively. For CK, the threshold numbers of lesions were 135, 35, 18, and 8, with corresponding total GTVs of 2.32 cc, 12.09 cc, 18.24 cc, and 41.52 cc respectively. Mean brain dose increased linearly with number of lesions and total GTV while V8 Gy, V10 Gy, and V12 Gy showed quadratic correlations to the number of lesions and total GTV. Modern dedicated intracranial SRS systems allow for treatment of numerous brain metastases especially for ≤10 mm; clinical evidence to support this practice is critical to expansion in the clinic.

Volume staging for arteriovenous malformation SRS treatment using VMAT

Volume staging involves dividing the target volume into smaller parts and treating each part separately. In this study, the feasibility of volume-staged stereotactic radiosurgery (VS-SRS) on a linear accelerator using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and a frameless patient positioning system is investigated. Ten patients, previously treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with arteriovenous malformation (AVM) sized from 1.6 to 4.0 cm in diameter, were selected. VS-SRS plans were created with the VMAT technique on the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) using the TrueBeam STx linear accelerator. For each patient, an AVM-VMAT set was planned with the AVM as the target and a PTV-VMAT set using the (PTV = AVM+1 mm) as the target. All targets were divided into two sub-volumes. The TPS data from the AVM-VMAT plans was compared to Gamma Knife (GK) VS-SRS plan data available in the literature. The AVM-VMAT and PTV-VMAT plans were compared to investigate the effect of a 1 mm PTV margin on normal brain (NB) dose. End-to-end testing was performed using a GaFchromic EBT3 film and point-dose measurements. Dosimetric effects of multiple setups were investigated through film-to-film comparisons. Median target dose coverage, NB V_12Gy , and conformity index for the AVM-VMAT plans were 97.5%, 17 cm³ , and 0.8, respectively. PTV-VMAT plans attained comparable target dose coverage, but the average NB V_12Gy increased by 48.9% when compared to the AVM-VMAT plans. Agreement of point-dose measurements with TPS calculations was -0.6% when averaged over all patients. Gamma analysis passing rates were above 90% for all film-to-film comparisons (2%/1 mm criteria), and for the film to TPS comparison (5%/1 mm). This work suggests that VMAT is capable of producing VS-SRS plans with similar dose falloff characteristics as GK plans. NB dose depends on PTV margin size, and two-stage treatment setups do not appear to contribute additional uncertainty to treatment delivery.

Linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations

PURPOSE

Linac stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is gaining popularity as a form of radiation treatment for cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) since the theory of combined radiosurgical and endovascular treatment poses much uncertainty and due to significant technical progress for SRS. This study focuses on how to evaluate obliteration and re-bleeding rates, and to determine factors and adverse effects influencing obliteration after linac-based SRS for cerebral AVMs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From a statistical record of 71 patients, 31 had partial embolisation, five surgery and 29 had no prior treatment. Using Kaplan-Meier survival and life table analyses, actuarial obliteration and annual bleeding hazard rates were calculated after SRS.

RESULTS

After a follow up of 1, 2 and 3 years the actual obliteration rates were 22, 59 and 66%, respectively whereby it was noted that prior embolization had no effect on the obliteration rate. Annual bleeding hazard rates were further analyzed after stereotactic radiosurgery to be 2.1% and 1.4% for the first and second year respectively. Asymptomatic abnormalities were detected after imaging in 33.9% of patients. A dose of less than 18 Gy significantly reduced the obliteration probability.

CONCLUSION

SRS is a therapeutic option for intracerebral AVM. In general, there is a low rate of morbidity and a high probability of nidus obliteration.

Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy with CyberKnife for Large Arteriovenous Malformations and Arteriovenous Malformations Located in Eloquent Areas

Literature has yet to establish an appropriate treatment strategy for large arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and AVMs located in eloquent areas. In this study, the treatment outcomes of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) with CyberKnife (CK) for large AVMs and AVMs in eloquent areas were evaluated. This study retrospectively evaluated 38 consecutive patients with AVMs treated with HSRT in the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center between August 2010 and July 2015. Obliteration rates and hemorrhage rates at 3- and 5-years of follow-up were calculated. Factors for hemorrhage and obliteration were analyzed with logistic regression analysis. Fourteen (36.8%) patients had a history of hemorrhage. Twenty (52.6%) AVMs were larger than 10 mL, and 34 (89.5%) AVMs were located in eloquent areas. The majority of the AVMs (84.2%) were classified into high grades (grades 3, 4, and 5) using the Spetzler-Martin grading scale. The median modified radiosurgery-based AVM score was 2.05, and the median Virginia Radiosurgery AVM Score was 3. The mean marginal dose was 24.5 ± 2.5 Gy. Twenty-three and 15 patients received three- and five-fraction stereotactic radiotherapy, respectively. At 3 and 5 years posttreatment, two (2.0%/year) and six (6.7%/year) patients had hemorrhage with obliteration rates of 15.2% and 16.7%, respectively. AVM localization in eloquent areas was a risk factor for obliteration failure. This study revealed that HSRT with CK for large AVMs and AVMs located in eloquent areas contributed to hemorrhage risk reduction and obliteration, at least in the early stages.

LINAC stereotactic radiosurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations: An updated single centre analysis of outcomes

Arteriovenous malformations (AVM) of the brain are congenital, high pressure vascular malformations, which are at risk of haemorrhage. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) can obliterate the nidus by delivering a precise high dose of ionising radiation in a single fraction. This paper updates long term AVM obliteration rates, time to obliteration and retreatment outcomes in LINAC delivered SRS treatment at the Royal Adelaide Hospital. A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained AVM SRS database supplemented by clinical case notes, patient correspondence and electronic medical records was performed. 89 AVMs received primary SRS treatment for which the crude obliteration rate was 61% (68% for 79 patients with adequate follow up). Higher marginal dose, smaller nidus size and lower Pollock-Flickinger (PF) score were significantly associated with AVM obliteration. The crude obliteration rates for patients with adequate follow-up and AVM diameter < 3 cm vs ≥ 3 cm were 76% vs 48%, respectively, and 93% with PF score < 1.0. Median time to obliteration was 36 months. Higher dose and lower PF score were associated with earlier obliteration. The crude obliteration rate after second SRS was 56% (9/16 patients) and no significant associations were found. These obliteration rates after primary and retreatment LINAC SRS are comparable to other studies. Marginal dose and PF score were the main predictors of obliteration overall as well as early (<36 months) obliteration.

Stereotactic Radio Surgery, Embolization and Conservative Management for Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformation: A New Zealand Experience of Long-Term Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) can be treated by microsurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as a stand-alone procedure, or combining embolization and conservative management. This single-center, retrospective review explored the outcomes of patients treated with SRS alone, embolization before SRS (ESRS), or conservative management for cerebral AVMs.

METHODS

Demographic details, Spetzler-Martin grade, SRS dose, obliteration, time to obliteration, imaging modality, rebleed, disease-specific mortality, and post-SRS complications were collected. Chi-square tests of independence and 1-way analysis of variance/Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed.

RESULTS

Two-hundred and thirty-nine patients were treated with SRS alone, 37 were treated with ESRS, and 83 were conservatively managed. Obliteration rates were 78% (SRS alone) and 70% (ESRS). Rebleed rates were comparable among SRS alone (4%), ESRS (0%), and conservative management (8%). Disease-specific mortality rates were significantly lower for SRS alone (1%) and ESRS (0%) compared with conservative management (6%, X² [2, n = 358] = 7.50, P = 0.024). Post-SRS complications occurred with SRS alone only and included radiation necrosis (n = 5), cavernous malformations (n = 2), and stroke (n = 1). Obliteration, rebleed, and disease-specific mortality rates were comparable among pediatric (<18 years), nonelderly (18-59 years), and elderly (≥60 years) age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that SRS and ESRS are safe and effective treatments for cerebral AVM (when quantified by obliteration, rebleed, and disease-specific mortality rates). With multinational, prospective, randomized controlled trials with long follow-up periods, the effectiveness and safety of SRS and ESRS compared with conservative management for AVM will be further clarified.

Anomalous location of intracranial vessels in adults

Anomalous intracranial vessels are not uncommon, and this finding is not always associated with arteriovenous malformations. Other conditions such as anomalous connections between arteries or phlebitc patterns can also present as vessels with abnormal intracranial locations. Noninvasive diagnosis is important to determine whether to do more invasive tests such as cerebral digital subtraction angiography or to estimate the risk of bleeding in arteriovenous malformations and therefore to evaluate the need for endovascular/surgical treatment. In this paper, we present an algorithm for the differential diagnosis of anomalous intracranial vessels according to their location (intra/extra-axial) and function (whether the vessels are arterialized). Moreover, we analyze the important points of the angioarchitecture of the principal arteriovenous malformations with risk of intracranial bleeding, such as pial arteriovenous malformations and dural fistulas.

Resolution of Radiation-Induced Necrosis in Arteriovenous Malformation with Bevacizumab: A Case Report and Review of Current Literature

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a proven treatment modality for inoperable arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). However, the rate of radiation-induced necrosis (RIN) is as high as 10%. A 6-year-old female patient presented with severe headache, emesis, and syncope, and workup revealed a Spetzler-Martin grade 4 AVM with intraventricular hemorrhage and hydrocephalus. The patient underwent a right frontal ventriculostomy followed by a linear accelerator-based SRS of 16.9 Gy. At 19 years, she developed progressive neurological symptoms. Diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a recurrent parietal AVM nidus. We delivered the linear accelerator-based SRS of 18.5 Gy to the AVM nidus. Within 9 months, she experienced episodic headaches and left-sided weakness and spasticity; symptoms were initially managed with dexamethasone. Follow-up MRI was notable for edema and nondetectable blood flow, consistent with RIN and AVM obliteration. The second course of steroids did not provide the symptom control. Persistent RIN was noted on MRI, and she had stigmata of steroid toxicity (centripetal obesity, depression, and sleep disorder). Two infusions of bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) were administered concurrently with a tapering dose of dexamethasone. The patient noted a near immediate improvement in her headaches, and 2 months following the second bevacizumab infusion, she reported a near-complete resolution of her symptoms and displayed improved ambulation. The development of RIN remains a noteworthy concern post-SRS of AVMs. While steroids aid with initial management of RIN, for persistent and recurrent symptoms, bevacizumab infusions serve as a viable treatment course, with the added benefit of reducing the likelihood of adverse effects resulting from prolonged steroid therapy.

Volume-Staged Radiosurgery for Large Arteriovenous Malformation

Large arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are challenges in management because of outcomes and adverse affects. Volume-staged radiosurgery has been an appropriate approach when removal resection and embolization are not recommended. A 53-year-old gentleman was diagnosed with a large intracranial AVM with persistent headache and short-term seizure. Brain magnetic resonance and angiograph showed a bulky volume of AVM nidus. Removal resection and embolization were not recommended because of high risk of adverse affects. The patient was treated by volume-staged radiosurgery. One year post-treatment, obliteration for right internal carotid artery was completed. Volume-staged radiosurgery is a potential treatment option for large AVM with controlled and obliteration efficacy, especially to AVMs which are not appropriate for removal surgery and embolization.

Single- and Multifraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery Dose/Volume Tolerances of the Brain

PURPOSE

As part of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Working Group on Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy investigating normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) after hypofractionated radiation therapy, data from published reports (PubMed indexed 1995-2018) were pooled to identify dosimetric and clinical predictors of radiation-induced brain toxicity after single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (fSRS).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eligible studies provided NTCPs for the endpoints of radionecrosis, edema, or symptoms after cranial SRS/fSRS and quantitative dose-volume metrics. Studies of patients with only glioma, meningioma, vestibular schwannoma, or brainstem targets were excluded. The data summary and analyses focused on arteriovenous malformations (AVM) and brain metastases.

RESULTS

Data from 51 reports are summarized. There was wide variability in reported rates of radionecrosis. Available data for SRS/fSRS for brain metastases were more amenable to NTCP modeling than AVM data. In the setting of brain metastases, SRS/fSRS-associated radionecrosis can be difficult to differentiate from tumor progression. For single-fraction SRS to brain metastases, tissue volumes (including target volumes) receiving 12 Gy (V12) of 5 cm³, 10 cm³, or >15 cm³ were associated with risks of symptomatic radionecrosis of approximately 10%, 15%, and 20%, respectively. SRS for AVM was associated with modestly lower rates of symptomatic radionecrosis for equivalent V12. For brain metastases, brain plus target volume V20 (3-fractions) or V24 (5-fractions) <20 cm³ was associated with <10% risk of any necrosis or edema, and <4% risk of radionecrosis requiring resection.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of radionecrosis after SRS and fSRS can be modeled as a function of dose and volume treated. The use of fSRS appears to reduce risks of radionecrosis for larger treatment volumes relative to SRS. More standardized dosimetric and toxicity reporting is needed to facilitate future pooled analyses that can refine predictive models of brain toxicity risks.

Microsurgery for Spetzler-Martin Grade I-III Arteriovenous Malformations: Analysis of Surgical Results and Correlation of Lawton-Young Supplementary Grade and Supplemented Spetzler-Martin Score with Functional Outcome

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the results of microsurgery for Spetzler-Martin (SM) grade I-III AVMs and evaluate the correlation of the Lawton-Young (LY) supplementary grade, supplemented Spetzler-Martin (SM-Supp/combined) score with the functional outcome.

METHODS

A total of 42 patients with SM grade I-III AVMs who had undergone surgery at our institute during a 3-year period (June 2013 to May 2016) were included in the present study.

RESULTS

All 42 patients had undergone primary surgery without previous embolization. Three patients (7.1%) had died due to surgical site hematoma in the postoperative period. One patient was lost to follow-up. The mean follow-up period for the remaining patients was 27 ± 14 months (range, 12-62 months). At the final follow-up examination of ≥12 months (FFU), 92.7% of the patients had a good outcome (modified Rankin scale [mRS] score ≤1), with an improved or unchanged mRS score in 87.8%. An AVM size >3 cm, diffuse AVM, SM grade III, and SM-Supp score >5 were associated with worsened mRS score at discharge and FFU. Higher LY grade (IV and V), eloquent AVM location, deep venous drainage, age >40 years, and unruptured presentation were not associated with worsened mRS score at both discharge and FFU. Of the 20 ARUBA-eligible patients, 19 (95%) had good outcomes. Postoperative angiograms for 39 patients revealed complete excision of the AVM in 37 (94.9%) and a residual AVM in 2 (5.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

High cure rates and excellent clinical outcomes can be expected with microsurgery for most patients with SM grade I-III AVMs. An AVM size >3 cm, diffuse AVM nidus, SM grade III, and SM-Supp score >5 are associated with postoperative worsening of functional scores in patients with SM grade I-III AVMs.

Patterns of Failure After Linear Accelerator Radiosurgery for Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have assessed the predictive factors for the arteriovenous malformation (AVM) response to stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). However, only a few have discussed the causes of failure. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the patterns of failure in patients with AVM who had undergone linear accelerator SRS.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 288 patients who had undergone linear accelerator SRS in our institution from 1995 to 2011. Failure was defined from the findings of the follow-up angiogram at 5 years, with failure identified in 44 patients. The distribution of causes was estimated using a descriptive analysis of literature-based causes, including a minimal margin dose of <18 Gy, a residual nidus outside the initial targeted volume, previous embolization, recanalization, and the size of the target volume. We also analyzed the associations among the causes.

RESULTS

Incomplete nidus identification (41%) and previous embolization (77%) were the most frequently observed conditions in patients with failure. Patients who had undergone previous embolization, for whom the cause of failure had always been identified (P = 0.001), were younger (P = 0.004) and had had a larger nidus volume (P = 0.025). Recanalization was rare (5 of 34 patients) and had occurred exclusively in women (P = 0.048). Larger nidus volumes were less frequent (mean, 2.18 ± 2.2 cm³; range, 0.13-10.8 cm³) and had been observed mainly in women when >2 cm³ (P = 0.012). An insufficient dose was observed in 9 patients and had occurred in the case of a larger volume (P = 0.031), which had resulted in dosimetry constraints in 3 patients and treatment in the vicinity of eloquent zones in 6 patients. No known cause was found in 5 patients, 4 of whom had had a low Spetzler-Martin grade (I and II; P = 0.003), suggestive of radioresistance.

CONCLUSION

The results of our detailed analysis have highlighted the distribution of the causes of failure and the potential role of radioresistance in treatment failure.

Predictors of radiation necrosis in long-term survivors after Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases

Background

The long-term risk of necrosis after radiosurgery for brain metastases is uncertain. We aimed to investigate incidence and predictors of radiation necrosis for individuals with more than 1 year of survival after radiosurgery for brain metastases.

Methods

Patients who had a diagnosis of brain metastases treated between December 2006 and December 2014, who had at least 1 year of survival after first radiosurgery were retrospectively reviewed. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, and the incidence of radiation necrosis was estimated with death or surgical resection as competing risks. Patient and treatment factors associated with radiation necrosis were also analyzed.

Results

A total of 198 patients with 732 lesions were analyzed. Thirty-four lesions required salvage radiosurgery and 10 required salvage surgical resection. Median follow-up was 24 months. The estimated median survival for this population was 25.4 months. The estimated per-lesion incidence of radiation necrosis at 4 years was 6.8%. Medical or surgical therapy was required for 60% of necrosis events. Tumor volume and male sex were significant factors associated with radiation necrosis. The per-lesions incidence of necrosis for patients undergoing repeat radiosurgery was 33.3% at 4 years.

Conclusions

In this large series of patients undergoing radiosurgery for brain metastases, patients continued to be at risk for radiation necrosis throughout their first 4 years of survival. Repeat radiosurgery of recurrent lesions greatly exacerbates the risk of radiation necrosis, whereas treatment of larger target volumes increases the risk modestly.

Gamma Knife Radiosurgery For Brain Vascular Malformations: Current Evidence And Future Tasks

Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has long been used for treating brain vascular malformations, including arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs), and cavernous malformations (CMs). Herein, current evidence and controversies regarding the role of stereotactic radiosurgery for vascular malformations are described. 1) It has already been established that GKRS achieves 70–85% obliteration rates after a 3–5-year latency period for small to medium-sized AVMs. However, late radiation-induced adverse events (RAEs) including cyst formation, encapsulated hematoma, and tumorigenesis have recently been recognized, and the associated risks, clinical courses, and outcomes are under investigation. SRS-based therapeutic strategies for relatively large AVMs, including staged GKRS and a combination of GKRS and embolization, continue to be developed, though their advantages and disadvantages warrant further investigation. The role of GKRS in managing unruptured AVMs remains controversial since a prospective trial showed no benefit of treatment, necessitating further consideration of this issue. 2) Regarding DAVFs, GKRS achieves 41–90% obliteration rates at the second post-GKRS year with a hemorrhage rate below 5%. Debate continues as to whether GKRS might serve as a first-line solo therapeutic modality given its latency period. Although the post-GKRS outcomes are thought to differ among lesion locations, further outcome analyses regarding DAVF locations are required. 3) GKRS is generally accepted as an alternative for small or medium-sized CMs in which surgery is considered to be too risky. The reported hemorrhage rates ranged from 0.5–5% after GKRS. Higher dose treatments (>15 Gy) were performed during the learning curve, while, with the current standard treatment, a dose range of 12–15 Gy is generally selected, and has resulted in acceptable complication rates (< 5%). Nevertheless, further elucidation of long-term outcomes is essential.

Benign Intracranial Lesions - Radiotherapy: An Overview of Treatment Options, Indications and Therapeutic Results

BACKGROUND

Radiation Therapy (RT) is an established treatment option for benign intracranial lesions. The aim of this study is to display an update on the role of RT concerning the most frequent benign brain lesions and tumors.

METHODS

Published articles about RT and meningiomas, Vestibular Schwannomas (VSs), Pituitary Adenomas (PAs), Arteriovenous Malformations (AVMs) and craniopharyngiomas were reviewed and extracted data were used.

RESULTS

In meningiomas RT is applied as an adjuvant therapy, in case of patientrefusing surgery or in unresectable tumors. The available techniques are External Beam RT (EBRT) and stereotactic ones such as Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS), Fractionated Stereotactic RT (FSRT), Intensity Modulated RT (IMRT) and proton-beam therapy. The same indications are considered in PAs, in which SRS and FSRT achieve excellent tumor control rate (92-100%), acceptable hormone remission rates (>50%) and decreased Adverse Radiation Effects (AREs). Upon tumor growth or neurological deterioration, RT emerges as alone or adjuvant treatment against VSs, with SRS, FSRT, EBRT or protonbeam therapy presenting excellent tumor control growth (>90%), facial nerve (84-100%), trigeminal nerve (74-99%) and hearing (>50%) preservation. SRS poses an effective treatment modality of certain AVMs, demonstrating a 3-year obliteration rate of 80%. Lastly, a combination of microsurgery and RT presents equal local control and 5-year survival rate (>90%) but improved toxicity profile compared to total resection in case of craniopharyngiomas.

CONCLUSION

RT comprises an effective treatment modality of benign brain and intracranial lesions. By minimizing its AREs with optimal use, RT projects as a potent tool against such diseases.

The use of Hypofractionated Radiosurgery for the Treatment of Intracranial Lesions Unsuitable for Single-Fraction Radiosurgery

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is commonly used in the treatment of brain metastases, benign tumors, and arteriovenous malformations (AVM). Single-fraction radiosurgery, though ubiquitous, is limited by lesion size and location. In these cases, hypofractionated radiosurgery (hfSRS) offers comparable efficacy and toxicity. We review the recent literature concerning hfSRS in the treatment of brain metastases, benign tumors, and AVMs that are poorly suited for single-fraction SRS. Published retrospective analyses suggest that local control rates for brain metastases and benign tumors, as well as the rates of AVM obliteration, following hfSRS treatment are comparable to those reported for single-fraction SRS. Additionally, the toxicities from hypofractionated treatment appear comparable to those seen with single-fractioned SRS to small lesions.

Assessing the volume of large cerebral arteriovenous malformations: Can the ABC/2 formula reliably predict true volume?

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are volume-dependent. The ability to estimate AVM volume has significant value in guiding AVM management.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether AVM volume measurement calculated from the ABC/2 formula is accurate compared to volume calculated by a computer-assisted planimetric method for large AVMs.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 42 intracranial AVMs >3 cm in diameter that underwent treatment with dose-staged hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) from 2001 to 2018. Two raters independently measured pre- and post-HSRT volumes using both the ABC/2 formula and computer-assisted planimetry in a blinded fashion. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by calculation of intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Absolute volumes and percent volume change following HSRT as determined using the two methods were compared using paired t-tests, linear regression, and Bland-Altman plot analyses.

RESULTS

The ICC between the 2 raters for planimetric and ABC/2 volumes was 0.859 and 0.799, respectively. ABC/2 volumes, 26.1 ± 26.6 cm³, were statistically smaller than planimetric volumes, 28.6 ± 27.1 cm³ (P = .008). Despite differences, the two methods were highly correlated (R² = 0.904, linear regression). The percent volume change following HSRT was significantly greater with the ABC/2 method than compared to planimetry (P = .009).

CONCLUSION

The ABC/2 and planimetric methods are reproducible for measuring cerebral AVM volumes. Although the ABC/2 method of volume estimation underestimates planimetric AVM volume, the high correlation between the two suggests utility of the ABC/2 method if one understands its limits, particularly with respect to estimating change in AVM volume after treatment.

Combined treatment approach to cerebral arteriovenous malformation in pediatric patients: stereotactic radiosurgery to partially Onyx-embolized AVM

PURPOSE

Treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVM)-the most common cause of stroke in the pediatric population-can be challenging due to the complexity of size, morphology, and location. There is a significant risk in comparison to AVM treatment among adults. Thus, AVM treatment in the pediatric population imposes unique challenges. Recent improvements include optimized catheter techniques and better embolization materials, such as Onyx, a non-adhesive liquid embolic agent used in the adult population. These improvements have increased the success rate of total and near-total obliteration of cerebral AVM. However, the use of Onyx causes significant distortion of the MR and CT images, which must be accounted for in any radiation treatment planning predicated on CT and MRI. These image distortions impact on the actual delivered dose to the nidus and behoove heterogeneity correction. Our group has previously shared a solution for heterogeneity correction in the adult population. The purpose of this study is to show our experience in this unique group of pediatric patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of pediatric patients, who were undergoing combined endovascular embolization followed by SRS. The cohort consists of 14 patients undergoing SRS treatment in our institute between November 2006 and December 2012 with a mean follow-up of 49.9 months. Within this cohort, we retrospectively reviewed 12 consecutive pediatric patients who underwent a combined endovascular and SRS approach with a mean follow-up of 52.1 months and two patients receiving SRS-only treatment were excluded.

RESULTS

In our cohort of 14 patients, 7 (50%) were male, with a mean age of 17.3 years (12.0-22.9) at the time of radiosurgery treatment. Mean age of beginning the combined modality treatment was 15.3 years (8.4-20). The median time from diagnosis to SRS was 24.3 months (11.1-64.4 months) in the complete cohort and 25.6 months (11.1-64.4) in the multimodality group. The overall median follow-up period was 49.9 months (range 12.8-118.8 months) in the complete cohort and 52.1 months (range 12.8-118.8 months) in the multimodality group. Eleven (78.6%) patients had at least one episode of hemorrhage prior to treatment. Spezler-Martin grades at baseline ranged from 2 to 5 (mean 3.2). Fifty percent had grade IV and V. Patients underwent a median of 2 (range 1-5) embolization procedures. The radiosurgical treatment dose to the margin of the angiography-based nidus: median prescription dose of 21.49 Gy (14.39-27.51) with a median max dose of 27.77 Gy (18.93-32.52). The median treatment volume was 0.6 cm³ (0.1-7.3 cm³). The Onyx embolization reduced the nidus target volume by a median of 66.7% (12.0-92.7%). We confirmed 10/14 (71%) complete closures. In 2/14 (14.2%) additional patients, a significant flow reduction was noted. In 1/14 (7.1%) patients, no significant change was noted during the observation period and two (14.2%) patients were without follow-up information. In two patients, post-treatment edema was noted; however, none was clinically significant and resolved without additional intervention or treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This cohort comprises the largest combined Onyx-SRS pediatric experience in the literature. In conjunction with our adult group study, we show that the use of Onyx reduces the SRS treatment target volume significantly. Importantly, we implemented the heterogeneity correction to avoid increased radiation exposure to normal surrounding brain tissue. The combined approach appears to be safe provided that the above-mentioned corrections are implemented.

Surgical Management of Adverse Radiation Effects After Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations: A Population-Based Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study is to report our experience in the surgical treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (cAVMs) related permanent symptomatic adverse radiation effects (PSAREs), to clarify an appropriate surgical management and to identify the risk factors related to their development.

METHODS

We evaluated 549 patients treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for cAVMs with a follow-up of at least 8 years. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to test different risk factors related to the development of PSARE. We retrospectively reviewed the records of these patients to analyze the clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients (2.5%) developed PSARE and were submitted to surgery. Higher average treated volume represents a significant risk factors for the development of PSARE (P < 0.05); on the other hand, older age and higher average dose reduce the risk of PSARE (P < 0.05). A favorable clinical outcome was achieved in 13 patients (93%) after surgery; in 1 patient, the unfavorable outcome was due to hemorrhage that occurred months after GKRS. Serial MRI scans following either surgical removal of the nodule or Ommaya reservoir positioning showed progressive reduction of brain edema in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of PSARE is controversial, especially for cAVMs treated with SRS. Surgical removal is rarely needed, but-if unavoidable-it can be a valuable option in experienced hands. A careful preoperative planning is always necessary to detect pathologic blood flow through the PSARE.

Volume-Staged Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations: Outcomes Based on an 18-Year Experience

BACKGROUND

Radiation-based treatment options of large intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVM) must balance the likelihood of obliteration with the risk of adverse radiation effects (ARE).

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the efficacy and risks of volume-staged stereotactic radiosurgery (VS-SRS) for AVM.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 34 AVM patients having VS-SRS between 1997 and 2012. A median of 2 stages (range, 2-4) was used to treat a median AVM volume of 22.2 cm 3 (range, 7.4-56.7). The median AVM margin dose was 16 Gy (range, 14-18); the median radiosurgery-based AVM score was 2.81 (range, 1.54-6.45). The median follow-up after VS-SRS was 8.2 years (range, 3-13.3).

RESULTS

Nidus obliteration was noted in 18 patients (53%) after VS-SRS. The rate of obliteration was 14% at 3 years, 54% at 5 years, and 75% at 7 years. Six patients (18%) had 11 bleeds after VS-SRS. Two patients (6%) remained neurologically stable, 2 (6%) patients had significant deficits, and 2 patients (6%) died. The actuarial risk of a first bleed after VS-SRS was 6% at 1 year, 12% at 3 years, and 19% at 7 years. Six patients (18%) underwent repeat SRS; all achieved nidus obliteration for an overall cure rate of 71%. Two patients (6%) had a permanent ARE after VS-SRS or repeat SRS.

CONCLUSION

VS-SRS permitted large volume intracranial AVM to be treated with a low rate of ARE. Further study is needed on dose escalation and decreasing the treatment volume per stage to determine if this will increase the rate of obliteration with this technique.

Impact of Onyx Embolization on Radiosurgical Management of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations: Treatment and Outcome

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a well-established treatment modality for cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). The main limiting factor in the radiosurgical treatment of AVMs is the volume of the nidus, with high-grade lesions often requiring combined treatment to reduce the SRS target volume. To overcome this limitation, we have been using a combined treatment approach consisting of endovascular embolization with Onyx followed by SRS.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate our clinical experience for safety and feasibility of this multimodality treatment approach.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of all adult patients with cerebral AVMs who received SRS treatment to their AVM after endovascular embolization with Onyx between June 2007 and June 2014.

RESULTS

Thirty-five consecutive patients were identified. The mean follow-up period was 52.4 ± 22.6 months (range 18-97 months). We confirmed 18 (51.4%) complete nidus closures at a median time of 49.5 months (range 6.5-81 months) from SRS. High-resolution Magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance angiography was performed routinely in all patients until closure of the nidus. Digital subtraction angiography was performed to confirm complete obliteration in 5 of the patients (28%); 13 patients are either planned for digital subtraction angiography or have refused it. In 6 patients (17%) a significant flow reduction was noted after a mean of 32 ± 16 months. No significant improvement was observed in 9 patients (26%) during the follow-up period. Two patients were lost to follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The multimodality treatment of cerebral AVMs using embolization with Onyx followed by SRS is feasible and safe. The use of Onyx significantly reduced the SRS treatment target volume.

Linear Accelerator Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Central Nervous System Arteriovenous Malformations: A 15-Year Analysis of Outcome-Related Factors in a Single Tertiary Center

BACKGROUND

Linear accelerator stereotactic radiosurgery is one of the modalities available for the treatment of central nervous system arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). The aim of this study was to describe our 15-year experience with this technique in a single tertiary center and the analysis of outcome-related factors.

METHODS

From 1998 to 2013, 195 patients were treated with linear accelerator-based radiosurgery; we conducted a retrospective study collecting patient- and AVM-related variables. Treatment outcomes were obliteration, posttreatment hemorrhage, symptomatic radiation-induced changes, and 3-year neurologic status. We also analyzed prognostic factors of each outcome and predictability analysis of 5 scales: Spetzler-Martin grade, Lawton-Young supplementary and Lawton combined scores, radiosurgery-based AVM score, Virginia Radiosurgery AVM Scale, and Heidelberg score.

RESULTS

Overall obliteration rate was 81%. Nidus diameter and venous drainage were predictive of obliteration (P < 0.05), ruptured status and previous embolization were not related to rate of obliteration, and low-grade AVMs had higher obliteration rates. Posttreatment hemorrhage incidence was 8.72%; nidus diameter was the only predictor (P = 0.05). Symptomatic radiation-induced changes occurred in 11.79% of patients and were significantly associated with unruptured status (P < 0.05). Treatment success as a composite measure was obtained in 70.77% of patients. Receiver operating characteristic curves were presented for each scoring system and outcome measure; best area under the curve was 0.687 for Lawton combined score in the obliteration outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

In the long-term, linear accelerator-based radiosurgery is a useful, valid, effective, and safe modality for treatment of brain AVMs.

Linear accelerator radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: Updated literature review

Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are the leading causing of intra-cerebral haemorrhage. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an established treatment for arteriovenous malformations (AVM) and commonly delivered using Gamma Knife within dedicated radiosurgery units. Linear accelerator (LINAC) SRS is increasingly available however debate remains over whether it offers an equivalent outcome. The aim of this project is to evaluate the outcomes using LINAC SRS for AVMs used within a UK neurosciences unit and review the literature to aid decision making across various SRS platforms. Results have shown comparability across platforms and strongly supports that an adapted LINAC based SRS facility within a dynamic regional neuro-oncology department delivers similar outcomes (in terms of obliteration and toxicity) to any other dedicated radio-surgical platform. Locally available facilities can facilitate discussion between options however throughput will inevitably be lower than centrally based dedicated national radiosurgery units.

Dosimetric effects of Onyx embolization on Gamma Knife arteriovenous malformation dose distributions

OBJECTIVE

Patients with arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) subsequent to embolization suffer from elevated local failure rates and differences in adverse radiation effects. Onyx is a common embolic material for AVMs. Onyx is formulated with tantalum, a high atomic number (Z = 73) element that has been investigated as a source of dosimetric uncertainty contributing to the less favorable clinical results. However, prior studies have not modeled the complicated anatomical and beam geometries characteristic of GKRS. This study investigated the magnitude of dose perturbation that can occur due to Onyx embolization using clinically realistic anatomical and Gamma Knife beam models.

METHODS

Leksell GammaPlan (LGP) was used to segment the AVM nidus and areas of Onyx from postcontrast stereotactic MRI for 7 patients treated with GKRS postembolization. The resulting contours, skull surface, and clinically selected dose distributions were exported from LGP in DICOM-RT (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine–radiotherapy) format. Isocenter locations and dwell times were recorded from the LGP database. Contours were converted into 3D mesh representations using commercial and in-house mesh-editing software. The resulting data were imported into a Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculation engine (Pegasos, Elekta Instruments AB) with a beam geometry for the Gamma Knife Perfexion. The MC-predicted dose distributions were calculated with Onyx assigned manufacturer-reported physical constants (MC-Onyx), and then compared with corresponding distributions in which Onyx was reassigned constants for water (MC-water). Differences in dose metrics were determined, including minimum, maximum, and mean dose to the AVM nidus; selectivity index; and target coverage. Combined differences in dose magnitude and distance to agreement were calculated as 3D Gamma analysis passing rates using tolerance criteria of 0.5%/0.5 mm, 1.0%/1.0 mm, and 3.0%/3.0 mm.

RESULTS

Overall, the mean percentage differences in dose metrics for MC-Onyx relative to MC-water were as follows; all data are reported as mean (SD): minimum dose to AVM = −0.7% (1.4%), mean dose to AVM = 0.1% (0.2%), maximum dose to AVM = 2.9% (5.0%), selectivity = 0.1% (0.2%), and coverage = −0.0% (0.2%). The mean percentage of voxels passing at each Gamma tolerance were as follows: 99.7% (0.1%) for 3.0%/3.0 mm, 98.2% (0.7%) for 1.0%/1.0 mm, and 52.1% (4.4%) for 0.5%/0.5 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Onyx embolization appears to have a detectable effect on the delivered dose distribution. However, the small changes in dose metrics and high Gamma passing rates at 1.0%/1.0 mm tolerance suggest that these changes are unlikely to be clinically significant. Additional sources of delivery and biological uncertainty should be investigated to determine the root cause of the observed less favorable postembolization GKRS outcomes.

Brain Edema after Repeat Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for a Large Arteriovenous Malformation: A Case Report

Brain edema due to venous thrombosis following stereotactic radiosurgery for a cerebral arteriovenous malformation (AVM) has rarely been reported. We report a patient with a large AVM in the eloquent area, and brain edema developed in this area after repeat Gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKRS). An 18-year-old female presented with a 4-year-history of persistent headache. Magnetic resonance imaging and transfemoral carotid angiogram revealed a high-flow large AVM in the left parieto-occipital area. Brain edema developed and aggravated patient's symptoms after time-staged GKRS. The cause of edema was thought to be the failure of the surrounding venous channels to drain the venous flow from the normal brain and the drainage was hampered by the persistent shunt flow from the AVM, which was due to the thrombosis of one huge draining vein of the AVM. The microsurgical resection of the AVM nidus eliminated shunt flow and completely normalized the brain edema. Microsurgical resection of the AVM nidus completely normalized the brain edema due to thrombosis of a draining vein of an AVM develops after SRS.

Management approach for recurrent brain metastases following upfront radiosurgery may affect risk of subsequent radiation necrosis

Purpose

Many patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone as initial treatment require 1 or more subsequent salvage therapies. This study aimed to determine if commonly used salvage strategies are associated with differing risks of radiation necrosis (RN).

Methods and materials

All patients treated with upfront SRS alone for brain metastases at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Salvage treatment details were obtained for brain failures. Patients who underwent repeat SRS to the same lesion were excluded. RN was determined based on pathological confirmation or advanced brain imaging consistent with RN in a symptomatic patient. Patients were grouped according to salvage treatment and rates of RN were compared via Fisher's exact tests.

Results

Of 284 patients treated with upfront SRS alone, 132 received salvage therapy and 44 received multiple salvage treatments. This included 31 repeat SRS alone, 58 whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) alone, 28 SRS and WBRT, 7 surgery alone, and 8 surgery with adjuvant radiation. With a median follow-up of 10 months, the rate of RN among all patients was 3.17% (9/284), salvaged patients 4.55% (6/132), and never salvaged patients 1.97% (3/152). Receiving salvage therapy did not significantly increase RN risk (P = .31). Of the patients requiring salvage treatments, the highest RN rate was among patients that had both salvage SRS and WBRT (delivered as separate salvage therapies) (6/28, 21.42%). RN rate in this group was significantly higher than in those treated with repeat SRS alone (0/31), WBRT alone (0/58), surgery alone (0/7), and surgery with adjuvant radiation (0/8). Comparing salvage WBRT doses <30 Gy versus ≥30 Gy revealed no effect of dose on RN rate. Additionally, among patients who received multiple SRS treatments, number of treated lesions was not predictive of RN incidence.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that initial management approach for recurrent brain metastasis after upfront SRS does not affect the rate of RN. However, the risk of RN significantly increases when patients are treated with both repeat SRS and salvage WBRT. Methods to improve prediction of toxicity and optimize patient selection for salvage treatments are needed.

The Role of Preradiosurgical Embolization in the Management of Grades III, IV, and V Arteriovenous Malformations

Objective

To evaluate the role of preradiosurgical embolization on obliteration rate, reduction of size, irradiation dose, and neurological outcome, in 90 patients presenting large arteriovenous malformations (AVMs).

Methods

Between October 1993 and October 2006, 90 radiosurgical procedures were performed to treat brain AVMs Spetzler–Martin (SM) grades III, IV, and V at the Department of Radiosurgery and Radiology of the Real e Benemérita Associação Portuguesa de Beneficência de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. Fifty-nine patients had embolization before radiosurgery and complete clinical and radiologic follow-up for at least 3 years. Inclusion criteria were as follow: SM grades III, IV, and V AVMs, no previous treatment, and clinical and radiological (angiogram and MRI) follow-up for at least 3 years. Obliteration rate, reduction of size, irradiation dose, and neurological outcome were compared in these two cohorts of patients. Mann–Whitney test, “Student’s t-test,” and χ² tests were used for statistical analysis, as appropriate. The level of significance was determined at p < 0.05.

Results

The mean size of the AVMs that underwent embolization was significantly greater when compared with non-embolized group (p < 0.05). Embolization significantly reduced the AVM diameter. Irradiation dose was significantly smaller in the embolized group (p < 0.05). No significant differences in final clinical outcomes, postprocedural radiological findings, rate of occlusion, and need for additional procedures were observed between the two groups (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Preradiosurgical embolization of large AVMs does not result in impaired obliteration rate compared with cases treated with radiosurgery alone. It did not add further morbidity and presented benefits of reducing size of the AVMs. Preradiosurgical embolization may facilitate the coverage of the AVM with the effective irradiation dose. Combined management may be effective for selected large lesions considered unsuitable for radiosurgery and otherwise untreatable.

Volume-staged radiosurgery for large arteriovenous malformations: an evolving paradigm

OBJECT

Large arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) remain difficult to treat, and ideal treatment parameters for volume-staged stereotactic radiosurgery (VS-SRS) are still unknown. The object of this study was to compare VS-SRS treatment outcomes for AVMs larger than 10 ml during 2 eras; Era 1 was 1992-March 2004, and Era 2 was May 2004–2008. In Era 2 the authors prospectively decreased the AVM treatment volume, increased the radiation dose per stage, and shortened the interval between stages.

METHODS

All cases of VS-SRS treatment for AVM performed at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Of 69 patients intended for VS-SRS, 63 completed all stages. The median patient age at the first stage of VS-SRS was 34 years (range 9–68 years). The median modified radiosurgery-based AVM score (mRBAS), total AVM volume, and volume per stage in Era 1 versus Era 2 were 3.6 versus 2.7, 27.3 ml versus 18.9 ml, and 15.0 ml versus 6.8 ml, respectively. The median radiation dose per stage was 15.5 Gy in Era 1 and 17.0 Gy in Era 2, and the median clinical follow-up period in living patients was 8.6 years in Era 1 and 4.8 years in Era 2. All outcomes were measured from the first stage of VS-SRS. Near or complete obliteration was more common in Era 2 (log-rank test, p = 0.0003), with 3- and 5-year probabilities of 5% and 21%, respectively, in Era 1 compared with 24% and 68% in Era 2. Radiosurgical dose, AVM volume per stage, total AVM volume, era, compact nidus, Spetzler-Martin grade, and mRBAS were significantly associated with near or complete obliteration on univariate analysis. Dose was a strong predictor of response (Cox proportional hazards, p < 0.001, HR 6.99), with 3- and 5-year probabilities of near or complete obliteration of 5% and 16%, respectively, at a dose < 17 Gy versus 23% and 74% at a dose ≥ 17 Gy. Dose per stage, compact nidus, and total AVM volume remained significant predictors of near or complete obliteration on multivariate analysis. Seventeen patients (25%) had salvage surgery, SRS, and/or embolization. Allowing for salvage therapy, the probability of cure was more common in Era 2 (log-rank test, p = 0.0007) with 5-year probabilities of 0% in Era 1 versus 41% in Era 2. The strong trend toward improved cure in Era 2 persisted on multivariate analysis even when considering mRBAS (Cox proportional hazards, p = 0.055, HR 4.01, 95% CI 0.97–16.59). The complication rate was 29% in Era 1 compared with 13% in Era 2 (Cox proportional hazards, not significant).

CONCLUSIONS

VS-SRS is an option to obliterate or downsize large AVMs. Decreasing the AVM treatment volume per stage to ≤ 8 ml with this technique allowed a higher dose per fraction and decreased time to response, as well as improved rates of near obliteration and cure without increasing complications. Reducing the volume of these very large lesions can facilitate a surgical approach for cure.

Long-term risk of radionecrosis and imaging changes after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases

Radionecrosis is a well-characterized effect of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and is occasionally associated with serious neurologic sequelae. Here, we investigated the incidence of and clinical variables associated with the development of radionecrosis and related radiographic changes after SRS for brain metastases in a cohort of patients with long-term follow up. 271 brain metastases treated with single-fraction linear accelerator-based SRS were analyzed. Radionecrosis was diagnosed either pathologically or radiographically. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression was performed to determine the association between radionecrosis and clinical factors available prior to treatment planning. After median follow up of 17.2 months, radionecrosis was observed in 70 (25.8%) lesions, including 47 (17.3%) symptomatic cases. 22 of 70 cases (31.4%) were diagnosed pathologically and 48 (68.6%) were diagnosed radiographically. The actuarial incidence of radionecrosis was 5.2% at 6 months, 17.2% at 12 months and 34.0% at 24 months. On univariate analysis, radionecrosis was associated with maximum tumor diameter (HR 3.55, p < 0.001), prior whole brain radiotherapy (HR 2.21, p = 0.004), prescription dose (HR 0.56, p = 0.02) and histology other than non-small cell lung, breast or melanoma (HR 1.85, p = 0.04). On multivariate analysis, only maximum tumor diameter (HR 3.10, p < 0.001) was associated with radionecrosis risk. This data demonstrates that with close imaging follow-up, radionecrosis after single-fraction SRS for brain metastases is not uncommon. Maximum tumor diameter on pre-treatment MR imaging can provide a reliable estimate of radionecrosis risk prior to treatment planning, with the greatest risk among tumors measuring >1 cm.

Brain arteriovenous malformations

An arteriovenous malformation is a tangle of dysplastic vessels (nidus) fed by arteries and drained by veins without intervening capillaries, forming a high-flow, low-resistance shunt between the arterial and venous systems. Arteriovenous malformations in the brain have a low estimated prevalence but are an important cause of intracerebral haemorrhage in young adults. For previously unruptured malformations, bleeding rates are approximately 1% per year. Once ruptured, the subsequent risk increases fivefold, depending on associated aneurysms, deep locations, deep drainage and increasing age. Recent findings from novel animal models and genetic studies suggest that arteriovenous malformations, which were long considered congenital, arise from aberrant vasculogenesis, genetic mutations and/or angiogenesis after injury. The phenotypical characteristics of arteriovenous malformations differ among age groups, with fistulous lesions in children and nidal lesions in adults. Diagnosis mainly involves imaging techniques, including CT, MRI and angiography. Management includes observation, microsurgical resection, endovascular embolization and stereotactic radiosurgery, alone or in any combination. There is little consensus on how to manage patients with unruptured malformations; recent studies have shown that patients managed medically fared better than those with intervention at short-term follow-up. By contrast, interventional treatment is preferred following a ruptured malformation to prevent rehaemorrhage. Management continues to evolve as new mechanistic discoveries and reliable animal models raise the possibility of developing drugs that might prevent the formation of arteriovenous malformations, induce obliteration and/or stabilize vessels to reduce rupture risk. For an illustrated summary of this Primer, visit: http://go.nature.com/TMoAdn.

Volume-staged versus dose-staged radiosurgery outcomes for large intracranial arteriovenous malformations

OBJECT

The aim in this paper was to compare the outcomes of dose-staged and volume-staged stereotactic radio-surgery (SRS) in the treatment of large (> 10 cm(3)) arteriovenous malformations (AVMs).

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed using PubMed. Studies written in the English language with at least 5 patients harboring large (> 10 cm(3)) AVMs treated with dose- or volume-staged SRS that reported post-treatment outcomes data were selected for review. Demographic information, radiosurgical treatment parameters, and post-SRS outcomes and complications were analyzed for each of these studies.

RESULTS

The mean complete obliteration rates for the dose- and volume-staged groups were 22.8% and 47.5%, respectively. Complete obliteration was demonstrated in 30 of 161 (18.6%) and 59 of 120 (49.2%) patients in the dose- and volume-staged groups, respectively. The mean rates of symptomatic radiation-induced changes were 13.5% and 13.6% in dose- and volume-staged groups, respectively. The mean rates of cumulative post-SRS latency period hemorrhage were 12.3% and 17.8% in the dose- and volume-staged groups, respectively. The mean rates of post-SRS mortality were 3.2% and 4.6% in dose- and volume-staged groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Volume-staged SRS affords higher obliteration rates and similar complication rates compared with dose-staged SRS. Thus, volume-staged SRS may be a superior approach for large AVMs that are not amenable to single-session SRS. Staged radiosurgery should be considered as an efficacious component of multimodality AVM management.

Stereotactic radiosurgery with and without embolization for intracranial arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECT

The effectiveness and risk of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the management of partially embolized intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) remain controversial. The aim of this analysis was to assess current evidence regarding the efficiency and safety of SRS for AVM patients with and without prior embolization.

METHODS

To compare SRS in patients with and without embolization, the authors conducted a meta-analysis of studies by searching the literature via PubMed and EMBASE for the period between January 2000 and December 2013, complemented by a hand search. Primary outcome was the rate of AVM obliteration on a 3-year follow-up angiogram. Secondary outcome was the rate of hemorrhage at 3 years after SRS. Tertiary outcome was permanent neurological deficits related to radiation-induced changes.

RESULTS

Ten studies eligible for analysis included 1988 patients: 593 had undergone embolization followed by SRS and 1395 had undergone SRS alone. The AVM obliteration rate was significantly lower in patients who had undergone embolization followed by SRS than in those who had undergone SRS alone (41.0% vs 59%, OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.37-0.56, p < 0.00001). However, the rates of hemorrhage (7.3% vs 5.6%, OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.74-1.83, p = 0.50) and permanent neurological deficits related to radiation-induced changes (3.3% vs 3.4%, OR 1.41, 95% CI 0.64-3.11, p = 0.39) were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Embolization before SRS significantly decreases the AVM obliteration rate. However, there is no significant difference in the risk of hemorrhage and permanent neurological deficits after SRS alone and following embolization. Further validation by well-designed prospective or randomized cohort studies is still needed.

[The outcomes of stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with cerebral arteriovenous malformations]

INTRODUCTION

Cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are the congenital anomalies of development of cerebral vessels during the embryonic period. The conventional therapy for AVMs currently includes endovascular management, microneurosurgical resection, and stereotactic irradiation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 315 patients with brain AVMs were subjected to stereotactic radiotherapy in 2005-2011. 238 (76%) patients had previous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) within different time (6 months to 5 years) before the therapy; 214 (68%) patients had headaches; 113 (36%) patients had focal neurological symptoms caused by localization; and 82 (26%) patients had seizures. Twenty-three patients were subjected to surgical resection of an intracerebral hematoma prior to radiotherapy and 119 (36%) patients received endovascular treatment including partial embolization of the stroma of AVM. 267 patients received single-fraction radiosurgical irradiation. In patients with large AVMs, we used the hypofractionation technique consisting in target irradiation with several (usually 2-7) fractions; the radiation dose per fraction exceeds 2 Gy. Forty-six patients were irradiated in the hypofractionation mode; two patients had a course of stereotactic radiotherapy in the standard fractionation mode. The marginal dose of radiosurgical irradiation was 13-30 Gy (the average dose was 24 Gy). The main group of patients (38 individuals) with large AVMs was treated using hypofractionation of 35 Gy per 5 fractions.

RESULTS

Control angiography was carried out in 225 patients who had been followed up for at least 2 years after therapy showed that complete obliteration was achieved in 83% of cases. The rate of symptomatic radiation reactions was less than 10%. The higher risk of developing obliteration was observed for AVMs less than 2 cm3 in size at marginal doses more than 24 Gy. In the hypofractionation group consisting of 27 patients with complete follow-up data, obliteration was observed in 10 (37%) patients. The rate of symptomatic reactions was less than 35%.

CONCLUSIONS

The radiosurgical method is a minimally invasive choice of treatment for patients with brain AVM, which allows one to achieve sufficiently high degree of obliteration with the minimum complication rate. The hypofractionation procedure is the method of choice for treating large AVMs. Stereotactic irradiation using the Novalis linear accelerator makes it possible to treat patients with AVMs of virtually any location and volume.