Analysis of the clinical benefit of 5-fluorouracil and radiation treatment in locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Modulating MGMT expression through interfering with cell signaling pathways

Guanine O6-alkylating agents are widely used as first-line chemotherapeutic drugs due to their ability to induce cytotoxic DNA damage. However, a major hurdle in their effectiveness is the emergence of chemoresistance, largely attributed to the DNA repair pathway mediated by O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). MGMT plays an important role in removing the alkyl groups from lethal O6-alkylguanine (O6-AlkylG) adducts formed by chemotherapeutic alkylating agents. By doing so, MGMT enables tumor cells to evade apoptosis and develop drug resistance toward DNA alkylating agents. Although covalent inhibitors of MGMT, such as O6-benzylguanine (O6-BG) and O6-(4-bromothenyl)guanine (O6-4-BTG or lomeguatrib), have been explored in clinical settings, their utility is limited due to severe delayed hematological toxicity observed in most patients when combined with alkylating agents. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify new targets and unravel the underlying molecular mechanisms and to develop alternative therapeutic strategies that can overcome MGMT-mediated tumor resistance. In this context, the regulation of MGMT expression via interfering the specific cell signaling pathways (e.g., Wnt/β-catenin, NF-κB, Hedgehog, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, JAK/STAT) emerges as a promising strategy for overcoming tumor resistance, and ultimately enhancing the efficacy of DNA alkylating agents in chemotherapy.

Modeling Combined Chemotherapy and Particle Therapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is the only cancer for which deaths are predicted to increase in 2014 and beyond. Combined radiochemotherapy protocols using gemcitabine and hypofractionated X-rays are ongoing in several clinical trials. Recent results indicate that charged particle therapy substantially increases local control of resectable and unresectable pancreas cancer, as predicted from previous radiobiology studies considering the high tumor hypoxia. Combination with chemotherapy improves the overall survival (OS). We compared published data on X-ray and charged particle clinical results with or without adjuvant chemotherapy calculating the biological effective dose. We show that chemoradiotherapy with protons or carbon ions results in 1 year OS significantly higher than those obtained with other treatment schedules. Further hypofractionation using charged particles may result in improved local control and survival. A comparative clinical trial using the standard X-ray scheme vs. the best current standard with carbon ions is crucial and may open new opportunities for this deadly disease.

Advances of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for pancreatic cancer

High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a novel therapeutic modality. Several preclinical and clinical studies have investigated the safety and efficacy of HIFU for treating solid tumours, including pancreatic cancer. Preliminary studies suggest that HIFU may be useful for the palliative therapy of cancer-related pain in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. This review provides a brief overview of HIFU, describes current clinical applications of HIFU for pancreatic cancer, and discusses future applications and challenges.

Primary advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer

Median as well as overall survival of pancreatic cancer patients in the advanced stage is extremely low despite advances in cancer therapy regarding tumor cell biology, therapy resistance, and diagnosis. In matters of chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer, favorable positive effect has been reached with different radiotherapy proceedings such as intraoperative radiation therapy with or without external chemo-/radiation therapy or with CRT alone with regard to local tumor pain, local tumor remission, or local control of disease and overall survival. Primary (chemo-) radiation therapy only rarely leads to local remission. Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) merely reaches pain palliation in most cases. By administering up-to-date primary CRT, especially with gemcitabine-associated CRT, local remission in up to 50% of patients can be observed. By applying neoadjuvant CRT, better resectability and the reduction of postoperative positive lymph node metastasis has been seen in patients with resectable or possibly resectable pancreatic cancer. With primary CRT, resectability can also be achieved in patients with primary unresectable pancreatic cancer. It has been shown at the evaluation of patients' progression samples--either treated with neoadjuvant or primarily with radiotherapy (with conventional radiation technique)--that the rate of local recurrence or local progression can be reduced in comparison with historical cohorts. By contrast, the rate on distant metastases was not affected. Whereas concurrent CRT leads to favorable local tumor control, this procedure has a minor effect as to the survival in most of the studies. Because metastases occur mostly out of the irradiation field and because of partly advanced local tumor progression, the concept of combined CRT with continuing chemotherapy was developed. Median survival of pancreatic patients in the advanced stage is approx. 3-5 months, with a 12-month survival probability of 10% despite advances in cancer therapy. On the other hand, the 5-year survival probability is 0.4%-3.0%. The causes of such a dismal prognosis can be understood first of all in the commonly late diagnosis, second in the aggressive tumor cell biology with continuing therapy resistance, and finally because an acceptable resection rate can be achieved only in specialized centers. Only 10%-15% of patients can be resected after the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Resection is considered a potential curative therapy. However, median survival of these patients amounts to only 13-18 months, with a 5-year survival of 10%-20%. The survival rate did not improve with a radical resection and extended lymphadenectomy. Furthermore, 15%-30% of primary nonmetastatic pancreatic cancer is unresectable due to extended vessel infiltration at time of diagnosis. The prognosis for these patients is very dismal due to lack of specific therapy; moreover, median overall survival is a maximum of 6-8 months.

Phase II study of capecitabine with concomitant radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: up-regulation of thymidine phosphorylase

PURPOSE

The objectives of this phase II study were to evaluate the effect of radiation (XRT) on thymidine phosphorylase (TP), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and the efficacy of capecitabine-XRT in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty patients received 50.4 Gy XRT with capecitabine 1,600 mg/m(2) on Monday through Friday for 6 weeks determined from our phase I study (Saif MW, Eloubeidi MA, Russo S, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:8679-8687). After capecitabine-XRT, stable and responding patients received capecitabine 2,000 mg/m(2) for 14 days every 3 weeks till progression. Restaging was performed every 9 weeks. Tumor specimens were procured with endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration before and at week 2 after capecitabine-XRT was started to evaluate the effect of XRT on TP, DPD, and TNF-alpha mRNA levels, determined by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

Among 20 patients, 4 (20%) had a partial response and 13 (65%) had stable disease. Two patients underwent surgical resection (10%). The 6-month survival rate was 84%, and the 1-year survival was 58%. Grade > or =3 toxicities included nausea/vomiting (5%), thrombosis (5%), hyperbilirubinemia (5%), and grade 3 gastrointestinal bleeding (5%). TP was elevated during week 2 when compared with the pre-XRT TP (P = 0.01). However, no such effect of XRT was found either on DPD (P = 0.22) or on TNF-alpha (P = 0.6). No correlation between TP and TNF-alpha was noticed. Also, no association between TP/DPD ratio and efficacy of capecitabine was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

This phase II study further confirms our phase I results and suggests that capecitabine-XRT is an effective, tolerable, and convenient alternative to an infusional 5-fluorouracil regimen for patients with pancreatic cancer. Although results support the use of capecitabine-XRT and TP was up-regulated, there appears to be additional genes associated with the response to capecitabine.

Radiofrequency ablation combined with palliative surgery may prolong survival of patients with advanced cancer of the pancreas

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The aim of this study is to identify the benefit acquired by the use of radiofrequency ablation in parallel to palliative therapy in patients with advanced cancer of the pancreas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data on 25 consecutive patients who underwent palliative therapy with or without radiofrequency ablation for unresectable pancreatic cancer were included in this retrospective review. Thirteen patients received palliative therapy alone, whereas 12 patients received palliative therapy plus radiofrequency ablation.

RESULTS

Overall mean survival rate in patients receiving paliative therapy alone was 13 months and the maximum survival was 30 months. Where radiofrequency ablation was applied, mean survival was estimated at 33 months (p = 0.0048). Stage III and IV patients treated with palliative therapy alone have a mean survival of 15 and 10 months, respectively. All stage III patients receiving radiofrequency ablation are alive at present and maximum survival has reached 38 months (p = 0.0032), whereas stage IV patients who were treated with radiofrequency ablation have an estimated mean survival period of 14 months (p = 0.1095).

CONCLUSION

Radiofrequency ablation in parallel to palliative therapy seems to provide survival benefit especially for stage III patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Further studies should be conducted to determine the usefulness of radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.

Chemoradiotherapy in patients with pancreatic carcinoma: phase-I study with a fixed radiation dose and escalating doses of weekly gemcitabine

AIM

The aim of this phase-I study is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly gemcitabine in concurrent combination with a total radiation dose of 54 Gy in patients with pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

In all patients, a total dose of 54 Gy was delivered in 30 fractions of 1.8 Gy/day. Gross tumor volume and regional lymph nodes were included in the irradiated volume with a 1- to 1.5-cm margin. The doses of weekly gemcitabine were escalated from 100 mg/m2 by increments of 50 mg/m2. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as hematologic toxicity, prolonged grade-3 non-hematologic toxicity, and incompletion of the planned treatment.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients entered the trial. From level 1 (100 mg/m2) to level 4 (250 mg/m2), no patient experienced DLT except for 1 patient at level 1. At level 5 (300 mg/m2), 3 of the 5 patients met the DLT criteria. One patient developed severe pulmonary abscess, and the other 2 patients had hematologic DLT. The overall partial response rate was 29%, and the median survival time was 13.7 months. The first relapse occurred at the in-field primary site in 6 patients and at distant organs in 13 patients.

CONCLUSION

The MTD of weekly gemcitabine was 250 mg/m2 in the present chemoradiotherapy setting. The efficacy of this chemoradiotherapy regimen is currently being evaluated in the phase-II setting.

Current management of locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Almost 30% of patients with pancreatic cancer present with large, locally advanced tumors in the absence of distant metastases. Because surgical resection is frequently contraindicated by vascular invasion, locally advanced pancreatic cancer has a dismal prognosis with a 6-10-month median survival. Recent advances in the multimodality treatment of other gastrointestinal malignancies have not altered the management of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer, a clinical dilemma reflected by the number of nonrandomized trials and anecdotal reports addressing this difficult disease. Our review summarizes the current status of aggressive surgical resection and neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer and suggests a treatment algorithm for patients with this disease based upon published clinical evidence.

Neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer: the Duke experience

The advantages of neoadjuvant (preoperative) chemoradiation therapy for pancreatic cancer include the assurance that all resected patients receive multimodality therapy; the opportunity for patients with occult metastatic disease to manifest themselves; and the potential to improve resectability. Since 1994, Duke University Medical Center has treated over 180 patients with localized pancreatic cancer using neoadjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5FU)-based chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Approximately 20% of patients demonstrate distant disease progression during CRT and avoid the morbidity of laparotomy. Almost 20% of locally advanced tumors on initial-staging CT can be resected following CRT. Patients who have successfully undergone resection have experienced favorable survival with an estimated 5-year survival rate of 36%. This article reviews the authors' experience and the lessons learned from it.

5-fluorouracil–based chemoradiation in unresectable pancreatic carcinoma: phase I-II dose-escalation study

PURPOSE

A Phase I-II dose-escalation study was performed to evaluate the possible impact of the dose on response, toxicity, pain relief, and outcome in patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 50 patients entered the study. The external beam radiotherapy (RT) dose was 39.6 Gy in the first 15 patients, 50.4 Gy in the next 15 patients, and 59.4 Gy in the remaining 20 patients, at five 1.8-Gy fractions weekly. During external beam RT, patients received concurrent continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (1000 mg/m(2) on Days 1-4 and 21-24). Patients were evaluated for toxic reactions, local disease control, survival, and pain relief.

RESULTS

No treatment-related deaths occurred from acute toxicity. Four patients required a temporary treatment interruption because of acute hematologic (2 patients) or GI (2 patients) toxicity, not correlated with the delivered RT dose. Three patients (6%) developed late toxicity (duodenal ulcer in 2 and duodenal stenosis in 1). All patients who developed late toxicity had received a dose of 59.4 Gy. At univariate analysis, only the RT dose correlated significantly with the incidence of late toxicity (at 2 years, 39.6-50.4 Gy resulted in 0% and 59.4 Gy resulted in 58.2%; p = 0.023). At multivariate analysis, the RT dose also showed a trend with the incidence of late side effects (p = 0.052). Overall, 6 patients had a partial response (12%) and 44 (88%) had no change. The overall response rate was 8.0% (95% confidence interval, 1.5-20.5%). The rate of response was not different in the three groups. In-field locoregional disease progression was seen in 7 patients (14.0%). Distant relapse was documented in 34 patients (68.0%). None of analyzed variables, in particular, the RT dose delivered, showed a statistically significant correlation with objective response, local control, incidence of metastasis, disease-free survival, or overall incidence of pain symptoms after therapy. The whole group median survival was 9 months. The actuarial survival rate at 1, 2, and 3 years was 31.3%, 2.8%, and 0.0%, respectively. None of analyzed parameters correlated significantly with survival at univariate or multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

In a Phase I-II study, the association of high RT doses with the incidence of severe toxicity in the treatment of unresectable pancreatic carcinoma was confirmed. Furthermore, this dose-escalation study did not document a clearcut correlation, using 5-fluorouracil-based chemoradiation, between the radiation dose and clinical outcome.

Pancreatic cancer growth is inhibited by blockade of VEGF-RII

BACKGROUND

Angiogenesis is important in the development and progression of pancreatic cancer. Therefore antiangiogenic therapy targeting endothelial cells may represent a promising therapeutic option. The aim of the study was to evaluate antiangiogenic therapy as a potential therapeutic option in pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Replication-deficient retroviruses encoding truncated VEGF-RII were used to block vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling. Tumor growth of 3 pancreatic cancer cell lines was assayed in a nude mouse model in which each pancreatic cancer cell line was subcutaneously inoculated together with retrovirus-producing cells. Expression of VEGF was assayed by RT-PCR and by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Oxygen tension in tumors was determined polarographically.

RESULTS

All 3 pancreatic cancer cell lines expressed VEGF mRNA, with the highest VEGF secretion seen in MIA PaCa-2 cells. In vivo therapeutic intervention through dominant negative inhibition of VEGF-RII significantly reduced the growth rate of subcutaneous tumors and inhibited tumor neoangiogenesis. Tumor oxygenation, however, was not altered in xenograft tumors treated with dominant negative retroviruses.

CONCLUSION

The ligand/receptor system consisting of VEGF and VEGF-RII seems to be of biologic significance in the pathogenesis of pancreatic cancer growth. Therefore therapeutic intervention in this angiogenic system by a retroviral-based gene transfer technology represents a rational and feasible new technique to inhibit tumor growth.

Intensity modulated radiation therapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Results of feasibility study

AIM: To explore whether intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in combination with chemotherapy could increase radiation dose to gross tumor volume without severe acute radiation related toxicity by decreasing the dose to the surrounding normal tissue in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

METHODS: Twenty-one patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer were evaluated in this clinical trial. Patients would receive the dose of IMRT from 21 Gy to 30 Gy in 7 to 10 fractions within two weeks after conventional radiotherapy of 30 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 wk. The total escalation tumor dose would be 51, 54, 57, 60 Gy, respectively. 5-fluororacil (5-FU) or gemcitabine was given concurrently with radiotherapy during the treatment course.

RESULTS: Sixteen patients who had completed the radiotherapy plan with doses of 51 Gy (3 cases), 54 Gy (3 cases), 57 Gy (3 cases) and 60 Gy (7 cases) were included for evaluation. The median levels of CA19-9 prior to and after radiotherapy were 716 U/mL and 255 U/mL respectively (P < 0.001) in 13 patients who demonstrated high levels of CA19-9 before radiotherapy. Fourteen patients who suffered from pain could reduce at least 1/3-1/2 amount of analgesic intake and 5 among these patients got complete relief of pain. Ten patients improved in Karnofsky performance status (KPS). The median follow-up period was 8 mo and one-year survival rate was 35%. No patient suffered more than grade III acute toxicities induced by radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION: Sixty Gy in 25 fractions over 5 wk with late course IMRT technique combined with concurrent 5-FU chemotherapy can provide a definitely palliative benefit with tolerable acute radiation related toxicity for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Should patients with locally advanced, non-metastatic carcinoma of the pancreas be irradiated?

A small number of patients exist with carcinoma of the pancreas with an inoperable but not metastasized tumor. Prospective randomized studies defined the standard of combined radiochemotherapy during the early 1980s for these patients. Since then, new drugs have shown considerable activity and in parallel improvements in radiotherapy treatment planning and delivery have been achieved. Therefore, it is time to ask whether patients with locally advanced, inoperable pancreatic cancer without metastases should still be irradiated or not. This review summarizes the current literature on combined radiochemotherapy for locally advanced carcinoma of the pancreas. Median survival times of 10-11 months and 1-year survival rates of about 40% can be achieved with modern radiochemotherapy regimens.

Predictive value of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in pancreatic cancer treated with radiochemotherapy

PURPOSE

To determine the predictive value of carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 in pancreatic cancer treated with radiochemotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ninety-five patients with locally advanced unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were treated with hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy to a total dose of 44.8 Gy combined with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid. CA 19-9 was measured before therapy, each week during therapy, and every 4 weeks during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

The median CA 19-9 before treatment was 420 U/mL; in the responder group it was 117 U/mL, and in the nonresponder group it was 806 U/mL. Patients with a pretreatment CA 19-9 less than the median had not only a significantly better tumor response (45.8%) but also a better survival prognosis (median survival 12.3 months) than those with a level higher than the median (tumor response 12.8%; median survival 7.1 months). The posttreatment median CA 19-9 for all patients also exhibited prognostic significance. The median survival of patients with a CA 19-9 level lower than the posttreatment median of 293 U/mL was 13.5 months, compared with 7.2 months for those with a CA 19-9 level greater than the median. To detect recurrent disease during follow-up, the sensitivity of CA 19-9 was 100% and the specificity 88%.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that CA 19-9 is of predictive value for prognosis, response, and detecting recurrence of pancreatic cancer in patients undergoing combined radiochemotherapy. Therefore, we recommend the routine implementation of CA 19-9 observation during the clinical course of treatment for patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing radiochemotherapy.

Treatment of unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma with combined radiochemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin

INTRODUCTION

Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas remains one of the most difficult malignancies to treat. Its incidence has steadily increased over the past four decades, and its prognosis is still dismal. AIM To assess tumor control and the palliative benefit of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), cisplatin (CDDP), and radiotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

METHODOLOGY

Systemic chemotherapy consisted of 5-FU (600 mg/m ), given as a 22-hour infusion on days 1 to 5, and CDDP (100 mg/m ), given as a 90-minute infusion on day 2. Treatment courses were repeated identically on day 21. Radiotherapy was delivered using megavolt irradiation of 25-MV photons with a two- or four-field isocentric technique.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients were treated with this radiochemotherapy (RCT). Twenty-one patients (78%) completed initial treatment. The median dose of radiation therapy delivered was 42.5 Gy. At the time of evaluation (1 month after the end of the RCT), no grade 4 (WHO) toxicity was observed; 12 patients had improved or stable body weight; pain was improved for 20 patients, with 11 experiencing no pain; and analgesic consumption decreased for 18 patients, of whom 11 stopped intake. The clinical benefit response was 7/27 (26%). Median survival and time to progression were, respectively, 9 and 4.4 months.

CONCLUSION

This RCT regimen had a good impact on clinical benefit in locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma, without severe side effects.

Phase II study of gemcitabine combined with radiation therapy in patients with localized, unresectable pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Gemcitabine is an active agent in pancreatic cancer, with known radiosensitizing properties. Therefore, a phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of gemcitabine combined with radiation therapy in patients with localized unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

METHODS

Weekly gemcitabine at a dose of 1,000 mg/m(2) for 7 weeks was given as an induction phase. Patients who showed both clinical benefit response (CBR) and reduced or stable tumor size on computed tomography (CT) scan entered the chemoradiotherapy phase of the treatment. This consisted of gemcitabine 400 mg/m(2) weekly x3 every 28 days for 2 cycles, given concurrently with radiotherapy, for a total dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions. After completion of radiotherapy, gemcitabine was continued as maintenance.

RESULTS

Twenty patients entered this study. Ten patients (50%) achieved CBR to gemcitabine in the induction phase; these patients had no objective tumor progression and were therefore enrolled in the chemoradiotherapy phase. Four patients (20%) had a partial response, and three patients (15%) underwent pancreatectomy. Two patients had negative surgical margins, and in one patient histologic examination of the residual mass showed only fibrosis. The median survival for the entire group was 8 months, and the median survival has not yet been reached for the chemoradiotherapy group.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with gemcitabine concomitant with radiation therapy according to the present schedule is well tolerated and can provide prolonged CBR and disease stabilization in patients with localized, unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with radiation and 5-fluorouracil

A retrospective analysis was performed, in a single institution, of patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma without evidence of distant metastases, who were treated with chemoradiation. Between 1994 and 2000, 24 patients were treated with radiation and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). The standard dose of radiation prescribed was 45 Gy to the 95% isodose in 25 fractions over 5 weeks. 5-FU was given as a 60 min infusion on days 1-5 and 29-33 at 350 mg/m2, following low dose folinic acid. Actuarial survival, local control and toxicity rates were assessed for the group. The median survival was 12 months, with a 48% 1-year survival and a 29% 2-year survival. The median time to progression was 8 months. The treatment was well tolerated and all patients achieved 100% compliance. In terms of radiological tumour response, five patients (22%) had a complete response, 10 patients (45%) demonstrated partial tumour shrinkage and a further three additional patients had radiological stable disease. The majority of patients experienced a symptomatic improvement. Chemoradiation can produce effective local control with symptomatic improvement in patients with localised carcinoma of the pancreas. Further studies are needed to determine the most effective combination of chemotherapy agents, combined with radiotherapy in the management of this disease.

Intraoperative hyperthermia and chemoradiotherapy for inoperable pancreatic carcinoma

The aim of this study was to evaluate the tolerability and the possible clinical benefit of intraoperative hyperthermia combined with multischedule chemotherapy and bypass surgery for the palliative treatment of inoperable pancreatic cancer. Ten patients with unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas received preoperative chemotherapy [5-fluorouracil (5-FU)], bypass surgery and postoperative chemotherapy (5-FU, doxorubicin and cisplatin) plus sandostatin and radiotherapy (45 Gy, 25 fractions, 5 days a week). A single session of intraoperative hyperthermia was performed, by using a waveguide-type applicator (433 MHz). The tumour region was heated to 43-45 degrees C for up to 60 min, while 500 mg 5-FU was infused simultaneously through the gastroduodenal into the splenic artery. Postoperative recovery was uneventful for all patients. A brief instrument was developed for evaluating patients' quality of life. Chemotherapy-related toxicity included myelosuppression, vomiting, alopecia and increase in blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, SGOT and SGPT. Glucose and amylase determinations remained within normal limits throughout the whole treatment. There was a significant improvement before and 1 month after combined treatment in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status (1.8 +/- 0.4), Scott-Huskinsson pain scale (3.2 +/- 0.8) and quality of life score (30.5 +/- 6.7). No progressive disease was noticed and the median overall survival was 11 (SE = 2.4) months. There was also a significant (P = 0.002, Wilcoxon test) decrease in values of both serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA19-9), from 7.6 +/- 1.3 ng/mL and 875.7 +/- 104.8 U/mL to 3.5 +/- 0.7 ng/mL and 65.3 +/- 14.1 U/mL respectively. The first clinical results suggest a potential advantage of using combined intraoperative hyperthermia, chemotherapy and postoperative radiotherapy in the palliative treatment of the adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. The whole procedure seems to be free of perioperative morbidity, while the chemotherapy toxicity was rather moderate. However, the preliminary nature limits the general applicability of our results.

Length and quality of survival after external-beam radiotherapy with concurrent continuous 5-fluorouracil infusion for locally unresectable pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with concurrent continuous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion affects the length and quality of survival in patients with locally unresectable pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients with histologically proven locally advanced and unresectable pancreatic cancer without distant metastases were evaluated in this prospective randomized trial. Sixteen patients received EBRT (50.4 Gy/28 fractions) with concurrent continuous infusion of 5-FU (200 mg/m(2)/day), whereas 15 patients received no chemoradiation. The length and quality of survival was analyzed and compared for the two groups.

RESULTS

The median survival of 13.2 months and the 1-year survival rate of 53.3% in the chemoradiation group were significantly better than the respective 6.4 months and 0% in the group without chemoradiotherapy (p = 0.0009). The average monthly Karnofsky score, a quality of life indicator, was 77.1 in the chemoradiation group, which was significantly higher than the 65.5 in the group without chemoradiotherapy (p < 0.0001). The number of hospital days per month of survival was significantly less in the chemoradiation than in the no-therapy group (12.3 vs. 19.0 days, p < 0.05). In the chemoradiation group, 5 patients (31%) had a partial response, and 9 (56%) had radiologically stable disease at a median duration of 6.1 months. The patients who had chemoradiation had a lower rate of liver and peritoneal metastases than patients without chemoradiotherapy (31% vs. 64%). Of 10 patients who experienced pain before chemoradiation, 8 (80%) received pain relief that lasted a median of 5.2 months.

CONCLUSIONS

EBRT with concurrent continuous 5-FU infusion increased the length and quality of survival as compared to no chemoradiotherapy and provided a definite palliative benefit for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Definitive Results of a Phase II Trial of Cisplatin, Epirubicin, Continuous-Infusion Fluorouracil, and Gemcitabine in Stage IV Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a cisplatin, epirubicin, gemcitabine, and fluorouracil (PEF-G) schedule on stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients ≤ 70 years, with no prior chemotherapy and with bidimensionally measurable stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 2, and adequate bone marrow, kidney, and liver function were eligible for this trial. Eligibility criteria for clinical benefit assessment were pain with at least a daily analgesic consumption of two nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or Karnofsky performance status between 50 and 70. Treatment consisted of 40 mg/m2 each of cisplatin and epirubicin day 1, gemcitabine 600 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 4 weeks, and fluorouracil 200 mg/m2/d as a protracted venous infusion.

RESULTS: Between April 1997 and April 1999, 49 patients from a single institution were eligible for the study. Altogether, 203 cycles (median, four cycles) of PEF-G were delivered. The objective response rate was 58% in 43 assessable patients and 51% in the intent-to-treat population. Fourteen patients had stable disease. Grade 3 or 4 World Health Organization neutropenia occurred in 51% of cycles, thrombocytopenia in 28%, anemia in 7%, stomatitis in 5%, and diarrhea, and nausea, and vomiting in 2%. The median duration of response was 8.5 months. The median time to tumor progression was 7.5 months. The median survival was 11 months in the assessable population and 10 months in the intent-to-treat population. Clinical benefit was achieved in 22 (78%) of 28 assessable patients.

CONCLUSION: PEF-G is a well-tolerated and safe regimen; it obtained a very high rate of durable responses and deserves further evaluation in a phase III trial.