Does prostate brachytherapy treat the seminal vesicles? A dose-volume histogram analysis of seminal vesicles in patients undergoing combined PD-103 prostate implantation and external beam irradiation

The Role of Salvage Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Radiation-Resistant Prostate Cancer

There are multiple treatment strategies for patients with localized prostate adenocarcinoma. In intermediate- and high-risk patients, external beam radiation therapy demonstrates effective long-term cancer control rates comparable to radical prostatectomy. In patients who opt for initial radiotherapy but have a local recurrence of their cancer, there is no unanimity on the optimal salvage approach. The lack of randomized trials comparing surgery to other local salvage therapy or observation makes it difficult to ascertain the ideal management. A narrative review of existing prospective and retrospective data related to salvage radical prostatectomy after radiation therapy was undertaken. Based on retrospective and prospective data, post-radiation salvage radical prostatectomy confers oncologic benefits, with overall survival ranging from 84 to 95% at 5 years and from 52 to 77% at 10 years. Functional morbidity after salvage prostatectomy remains high, with rates of post-surgical incontinence and erectile dysfunction ranging from 21 to 93% and 28 to 100%, respectively. Factors associated with poor outcomes after post-radiation salvage prostatectomy include preoperative PSA, the Gleason score, post-prostatectomy staging, and nodal involvement. Salvage radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment option for patients with biochemical recurrence after radiotherapy, although careful patient selection is important to optimize oncologic and functional outcomes.

Patterns of Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Brachytherapy Determined by Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography Imaging

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to characterize the patterns of prostate cancer recurrence after brachytherapy (BT) using 2-(3-[1-carboxy-5-([6-¹⁸F-fluoropyridine-3-carbonyl]-amino)-pentyl]-ureido)-pentanedioic acid ([¹⁸F]DCFPyL) prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) imaging.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients were selected from an ongoing prospective institutional trial investigating the use of [¹⁸F]DCFPyL PSMA PET and CT in recurrent prostate cancer (NCT02899312). This report included patients who underwent BT (either monotherapy or boost) and experienced a biochemical failure (BF) defined by the Phoenix definition (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] > 2 ng/mL above nadir).

RESULTS

Between March 2017 and April 2020, 670 patients underwent [¹⁸F]DCFPyL PSMA PET and CT imaging. Of these 670 patients, 93 were treated with BT; 73 underwent monotherapy, and 20 underwent BT boost (19 low-dose rate and 1 high-dose rate). To report on patterns of recurrence outcomes, 86 patients (median prescan PSA 6.0) with a positive [¹⁸F]DCFPyL PSMA PET and CT scan and true BF were included. The most common location of relapse was local; 62.8% had a component of local failure (defined as prostate and/or seminal vesicles), and 46.5% had isolated local failure only, with no other sites of involvement. Regional failure occurred in 40.7% of patients, and 36.0% had metastatic failure. Isolated local recurrence was seen in 54.3% of monotherapy patients versus only in 12.5% of boost patients. Metastatic failure was seen in 28.6% of monotherapy patients versus 68.8% of the boost patients. Local recurrences (69.0%) were found within the same prostate biopsy sextant involved with the tumor at diagnosis, and 76.0% of patients with seminal vesicle recurrences had prostate-base involvement at diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to previous evidence, our study suggests that in prostate BT patients with biochemical recurrence, the most common site of failure is local for the patients treated with monotherapy and metastatic for patients treated with a combination of external beam radiation and BT boost.

Stage T3b prostate cancer diagnosed by seminal vesicle biopsy and treated with neoadjuvant hormone therapy, permanent brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy

OBJECTIVES

To report the long-term results of prostate brachytherapy followed by external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in men with a positive seminal vesicle biopsy (+SVB).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 1081 men with localised prostate cancer were treated with permanent brachytherapy, of which 615 had staging SVB and 53 (9.4%) were positive. Higher stage, Gleason score and PSA level were associated with a +SVB (P < 0.001). Patients with +SVB and negative laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection, bone and CT scans had 3 months of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) followed by ¹⁰³ Pd implant to the prostate (dose 100 Gy) and proximal SVs, and 2 months later 45 Gy EBRT. ADT was continued for a median of 6 months (total ADT 9 months). The mean (range) follow-up was 9 (5-22) years.

RESULTS

Biochemical freedom from failure (computed by the Phoenix definition), freedom from metastasis, and cause-specific survival (CSS) for patients with a negative SVB (-SVB) vs +SVB at 15 years, was 76.3% vs 60.6% (P = 0.001), 95.4% vs 78.2% (P < 0.001), and 95% vs 70.4% (P < 0.001), respectively. Prostate cancer death occurred in 45 of 590 (7.6%) men with a -SVB vs eight of 25 (32%) with a +SVB (odds ratio 5.7, 95% confidence interval 2.35-13.9, P < 0.001). Cox proportion hazard rates (HRs) demonstrated Gleason score (P < 0.001, HR 1.9), stage (P = 0.010, HR 1.42), RT dose (P = 0.013, HR 0.991), and +SVB (P = 0.001, HR 4.48), as significantly associated with CSS.

CONCLUSIONS

Men with a +SVB have inferior CSS compared to those with a -SVB. However, a strategy that included a SVB in high-risk patients and implantation of the SVs in men undergoing combined therapy still yields favourable long-term results.

Lack of Benefit From the Addition of External Beam Radiation Therapy to Brachytherapy for Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

A recent randomized controlled trial demonstrated that the addition of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to brachytherapy did not improve progression-free survival in select patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. We evaluated whether the addition of EBRT to brachytherapy improves prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) for intermediate- and high-risk disease using a large national database.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We identified 5836 patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked database with a diagnosis of National Comprehensive Cancer Network intermediate-risk (Gleason score 7, prostate-specific antigen 10-20 ng/mL, or stage cT2b-T2c) or high-risk (Gleason score 8-10 or prostate-specific antigen >20 ng/mL and stage ≤cT3a) prostate cancer who had undergone brachytherapy, with or without EBRT and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Patients were diagnosed from 2004 through 2009. Intermediate-risk patients with Gleason score ≤3+4 and 1 intermediate-risk factor were considered favorable and all others unfavorable. We used multivariable Fine-Gray competing risks regression to study PCSM while adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors and ADT use.

RESULTS

Overall, 50.3% of intermediate- and high-risk patients who received brachytherapy and EBRT did not have significantly improved PCSM compared with that of the patients who received brachytherapy alone (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-3.11; P=.322; 5-year PCSM 2.4% vs 1.0%). This lack of benefit was seen among favorable intermediate-risk (AHR 2.66, 95% CI 0.93-7.62, P=.069; 5-year PCSM 1.3% vs 0.6%), unfavorable intermediate-risk (AHR 0.68, 95% CI 0.16-2.96, P=.612; 5-year PCSM 1.0% vs 1.2%), and high-risk (AHR 1.82, 95% CI 0.67-4.98, P=.242; 5-year PCSM 5.3% vs 2.1%) subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that certain patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy might not benefit from the addition of EBRT. A randomized controlled trial of brachytherapy plus ADT with or without EBRT for unfavorable intermediate- and favorable high-risk organ-confined prostate cancer should be undertaken.

Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Boost for Unfavorable Prostate Cancer: The Georgetown University Experience

Purpose/objective(s)

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is emerging as a minimally invasive alternative to brachytherapy to deliver highly conformal, dose-­escalated radiation therapy (RT) to the prostate. SBRT alone may not adequately cover the tumor extensions outside the prostate commonly seen in unfavorable prostate cancer. External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with high dose rate brachytherapy boost is a proven effective therapy for unfavorable prostate cancer. This study reports on early prostate-specific antigen and prostate cancer-specific quality of life (QOL) outcomes in a cohort of unfavorable patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and SBRT boost.

Materials/methods

Prostate cancer patients treated with SBRT (19.5 Gy in three fractions) followed by fiducial-guided IMRT (45–50.4 Gy) from March 2008 to September 2012 were included in this retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Biochemical failure was assessed using the Phoenix definition. Patients completed the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC)-26 at baseline, 1 month after the completion of RT, every 3 months for the first year, then every 6 months for a minimum of 2 years.

Results

One hundred eight patients (4 low-, 45 intermediate-, and 59 high-risk) with median age of 74 years completed treatment, with median follow-up of 4.4 years. Sixty-four percent of the patients received androgen deprivation therapy prior to the initiation of RT. The 3-year actuarial biochemical control rates were 100 and 89.8% for intermediate- and high-risk patients, respectively. At the initiation of RT, 9 and 5% of men felt their urinary and bowel function was a moderate to big problem, respectively. Mean EPIC urinary and bowel function and bother scores exhibited transient declines, with subsequent return to near baseline. At 2 years posttreatment, 13.7 and 5% of men felt their urinary and bowel function was a moderate to big problem, respectively.

Conclusion

At 3-year follow-up, biochemical control was favorable. Acute urinary and bowel symptoms were comparable to conventionally fractionated IMRT and brachytherapy. Patients recovered to near their baseline urinary and bowel function by 2 years posttreatment. A combination of IMRT with SBRT boost is well tolerated with minimal impact on prostate cancer-specific QOL.

Brachytherapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review

Low-dose rate brachytherapy has become a mainstream treatment option for men diagnosed with prostate cancer because of excellent long-term treatment outcomes in low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients. To a great extend due to patient lead advocacy for minimally invasive treatment options, high-quality prostate implants have become widely available in the US, Europe, and Japan. High-dose-rate (HDR) afterloading brachytherapy in the management of localised prostate cancer has practical, physical, and biological advantages over low-dose-rate seed brachytherapy. There are no free live sources used, no risk of source loss, and since the implant is a temporary procedure following discharge no issues with regard to radioprotection use of existing facilities exist. Patients with localized prostate cancer may benefit from high-dose-rate brachytherapy, which may be used alone in certain circumstances or in combination with external-beam radiotherapy in other settings. The purpose of this paper is to present the essentials of brachytherapies techniques along with the most important studies that support their effectiveness in the treatment of prostate cancer.

New implant technique for separation of the seminal vesicle and rectal mucosa for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

For safer treatment of seminal vesicles (SVs), we initiated a new technique using an anchor applicator for high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) of prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between January 2004 and March 2005, 23 intermediate- to high-risk patients were treated with HDR-ISBT as monotherapy. Transrectal ultrasonography guided implantation of the treatment applicator in and around the prostate gland and proximal SV. We used an "anchor" applicator to prevent posterior displacement of the SV. After insertion of the anchor applicator, the actual treatment applicator was implanted at the best position for optimal SV coverage. SV coverage was analyzed using a dose-volume histogram.

RESULTS

Implantation of the applicator on the posterior side of the SV was successful for 43 of 46 SVs (93%). The median percentage of the SVs receiving the prescribed dose was 41% (range 11-86%). Only one case of acute Grade 2 toxicity (3%) was seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Our anchor applicator technique for HDR-ISBT can separate the SV from the rectum. This is the first report of dose-volume histogram analysis of the SV for HDR-ISBT.

Is seminal vesicle implantation with permanent sources possible? A dose–volume histogram analysis in patients undergoing combined 103Pd implantation and external beam radiation for T3c prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Combined brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) of the prostate and seminal vesicles (SVs) is evolving as a successful treatment option for high-risk prostate cancer. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis of the SV was performed in patients with biopsy-positive SV who received implantation of the SV and prostate.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fifteen consecutive patients with high-risk features (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] > or =10 ng/mL, Gleason score > or = 7, or clinical stage > or = T2b) and a positive SV biopsy were treated with a 103Pd implant of the prostate and SV followed by 45Gy of EBRT. DVHs were generated for the prostate and total SV volume (SVT). In addition, the SV was divided into 3-mm-thick volumes identified as SV1, SV2, SV3, SV4, SV5, and SV6 starting from the junction of the prostate and SV and extending distally. Delivered dose was defined as the D90 (dose delivered to 90% of the organ on DVH).

RESULTS

The median number of seeds implanted into the prostate and the SVT was 59 (41-94) and 9 (4-21), respectively. The median D90 values for the prostate, SVT, SV1, SV2, SV3, SV4, SV5, and SV6 were 103.2 (87.4-137.1), 46.2 (4.0-69.4), 76.0 (31.2-147), 63.4 (25.1-145.9), 49.7 (15.3-118), 27.4 (9.3-135.1), 14.2 (2.3-100.3), and 3.9 (0-61.5) Gy, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Implantation of the SV using a real-time intraoperative approach is technically feasible and results in higher doses to the SV than has been reported with implantation of the prostate alone. Although dose distribution in the SV can be variable and unpredictable, these doses, in combination with 45 Gy of EBRT, may be adequate to control disease spread in these organs.

Permanent prostate brachytherapy: pathologic implications as assessed on radical prostatectomy specimens of broadening selection criteria for monotherapy

OBJECTIVES

To assess the impact of clinical selection criteria on pathologic features among patients treated by radical retropubic prostatectomy and to evaluate the implications of broadening eligibility for permanent prostate brachytherapy monotherapy.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 423 patients with prostate cancer, who underwent diagnostic biopsy and subsequent radical retropubic prostatectomy, were selected for this study. Four subgroups were defined using the American Brachytherapy Society selection criteria, including prostate size limits (group 1), no prostate size limits (group 2A), a modified set of criteria (group 2B), and clinical Stage T1-T2 (group 3). The rates of extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and lymph node involvement were compared.

RESULTS

Adverse pathologic features at radical retropubic prostatectomy were noted in 8 (9.3%) of 86 patients in group 1, 11 (5.6%) of 195 patients in group 2A, 35 (12.0%) of 292 patients in group 2B, and 90 (21.8%) of 413 patients in group 3. The rates of extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and lymph node involvement appeared comparable among groups 1 (5.8%, 3.5%, and 0.0%, respectively), 2A (3.6%, 2.1%, and 0.0%, respectively), and 2B (6.9%, 3.8%, and 1.4%, respectively), but were greater in group 3 (9.7%, 7.8%, and 4.4%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Judicious broadening of the clinical selection criteria may allow a greater number of patients to be eligible for permanent prostate brachytherapy monotherapy by including patients whose risk of having adverse pathologic features is comparable to that of patients currently deemed suitable for permanent prostate brachytherapy monotherapy. Prospective assessment of oncologic outcomes of such an approach is required.

20Gy versus 44Gy supplemental beam radiation with Pd-103 prostate brachytherapy: Preliminary biochemical outcomes from a prospective randomized multi-center trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

While favorable results are achieved with combined modality irradiation, there has never been a rigorous study of the need for supplemental beam. The study reported here compares clinical outcomes with substantially different external beam radiation doses. Similar to classic randomized Wilm's tumor studies from the 1980s, the intention of the trial design was to decrementally test the need for beam radiation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

As of June 2000, 165 of a planned 600 patients with 1997 AJC clinical stage T1c-T2a prostatic carcinoma, Gleason grade 7-10 and/or PSA 10-20 ng/ml, were treated on a randomized protocol comparing 44 versus 20 Gy pre-implant supplemental beam radiation, combined with Pd-103, 90 versus 115 Gy, respectively (NIST-1999). Freedom from biochemical failure was defined as a serum PSA</=0.5 ng/ml at last follow-up. Patients were censored at last follow-up if their serum PSA was still decreasing. Patients whose serum PSA nadired at a value >0.5 ng/ml were scored as failures at the time at which their PSA nadired. The follow-up period for non-failing patients ranged from 0.5 to 4.9 years (median: 2.9 years). Accrual of 566 patients was achieved in October 2004. The study was closed at that time because of slowing accrual, due in part to the findings reported here.

RESULTS

The overall actuarial freedom from biochemical progression at 3 years is 85%, with 59 patients followed beyond 3 years. A total of 21 patients have developed biochemical failure, 12 treated with 20 Gy and nine treated with 44 Gy. There were no clinically evident local failures. The actuarial biochemical freedom-from-failure rate at 3 years was 83% for 20 Gy patients versus 88% for 44 Gy patients (P=0.64). For 112 patients with a pre-treatment PSA<10 ng/ml, the 3-year freedom from progression was 84% in patients receiving 20 Gy beam radiation versus 94% in those who received 44 Gy beam (P=0.16). For 47 patients with a pre-treatment PSA>10 ng/ml, the 3-year freedom from progression was 82% in patients receiving 20 Gy beam radiation versus 72% in those who received 44 Gy beam (P=0.38).

CONCLUSIONS

The randomized data presented here suggests that the likelihood of biochemical cure is similar with standard (44 Gy) or lower dose (20 Gy) supplemental beam radiation. Since the biological effect of 20 Gy external beam radiation is likely to be small, we interpret these preliminary results to suggest that supplemental beam radiation is unnecessary, in the setting of a high degree of prostate coverage by the brachytherapy prescription dose. With closure of this study, we have begun treating intermediate and high risk patients on a prospective randomized comparison of Pd-103 with 20 versus 0 Gy supplemental beam radiation.

Salvage reimplantation in patient with local recurrent prostate carcinoma after brachytherapy with three dimensional computed tomography-guided permanent pararectal implant

Thirty-one [31] patients with local recurrent or residual adenocarcinoma of the prostate, with no evidence of distant metastases, were treated with second permanent implant using a stereotactic three dimensional system and posterior pararectal CT-guided method. All patients had extensive under local anesthesia or IV sedation pararectal CT-guided biopsy of the prostate and seminal vesicles. All patients except one had 3 month neoadjuvant androgen ablation prior to salvage reimplantation. Twenty [20] of these patients had local recurrence in the prostate and eleven [11] patients had seminal vesicle invasion which was not diagnosed nor treated with the initial brachytherapy. In addition, the patients had PSA failure or local palpable disease, "cold spots" with CT imaging or areas of dosage less than 80% of the prescribed dose with DVH (dose volume histogram). Initial prescribed dose was 120 Gy with (103)Pd loose seeds in 26 patients and 144 Gy with (125)I loose seeds in 5 patients. For the reimplant the dosage in the recurrent site was 100-144 Gy with (125)I seeds in strand in 24 patients (77%) and 100-120 Gy with (103)Pd loose seeds in 7 patients (23%). The preference of (125)I seeds in the second treatment was because only (125)I in strand was available at the time of the reimplant. Eleven [11] patients had second implant twelve to twenty-four months after the initial implant and 20 patients had after twenty-five to eighty-seven months and median follow-up was thirty months. A high level of biochemical control (87%) was achieved in all of these patients who are recognized as high risk due to local recurrence. Four [4] patients experienced grade 2 or 3 GI or GU complications and two [2] patients experienced grade 4 GI complications. Patients with local recurrent prostate cancer following initial brachytherapy including those with seminal vesicle invasion can be successfully treated with pararectal stereotactic CT-guided reimplantation. Assessment of seminal vesicle status is an essential part of staging for local recurrence.

Introducing a prognostic score for pretherapeutic assessment of seminal vesicle invasion in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To identify prostate cancer patients who will have the most likely benefit from sparing the seminal vesicles during 3D conformal radiation therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1988 to 2001, 532 patients underwent radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Primary endpoint was the pathological evidence of seminal vesicle invasion. Variables for univariate and multivariate analyses were age, prostate weight, clinical stage, PSA level, Gleason score, number and site of positive prostate sextant biopsies. Multivariate logistic regression with backward stepwise variable selection was used to identify a set of independent predictors of seminal vesicle invasion, and the variable selection procedure was validated by non-parametric bootstrap.

RESULTS

Seminal vesicle invasion was reported in 14% of the cases. In univariate analysis, all variables except age and prostate weight were predictors of seminal vesicle invasion. In multivariate analysis, only the number of positive biopsies (P<0.0001), Gleason score (P<0.007) and PSA (P<0.0001) were predictors for seminal vesicles invasion. Based on the multivariate model, we were able to develop a prognostic score for seminal vesicle invasion, which allowed us to discriminate two patient groups: A group with low risk of seminal vesicles invasion (5.7%), and the second with a higher risk of seminal vesicles invasion (32.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Using the number of positive biopsies, Gleason score and PSA, it is possible to identify patients with low risk of seminal vesicles invasion. In this population, seminal vesicles might be excluded as a target volume in radiation therapy of prostate cancer.

Semiautomatic three-dimensional segmentation of the prostate using two-dimensional ultrasound images

In this paper, we report on two methods for semiautomatic three-dimensional (3-D) prostate boundary segmentation using 2-D ultrasound images. For each method, a 3-D ultrasound prostate image was sliced into the series of contiguous 2-D images, either in a parallel manner, with a uniform slice spacing of 1 mm, or in a rotational manner, about an axis approximately through the center of the prostate, with a uniform angular spacing of 5 degrees. The segmentation process was initiated by manually placing four points on the boundary of a selected slice, from which an initial prostate boundary was determined. This initial boundary was refined using the Discrete Dynamic Contour until it fit the actual prostate boundary. The remaining slices were then segmented by iteratively propagating this result to an adjacent slice and repeating the refinement, pausing the process when necessary to manually edit the boundary. The two methods were tested with six 3-D prostate images. The results showed that the parallel and rotational methods had mean editing rates of 20% and 14%, and mean (mean absolute) volume errors of -5.4% (6.5%) and -1.7% (3.1%), respectively. Based on these results, as well as the relative difficulty in editing, we conclude that the rotational segmentation method is superior.

Treatment of prostate cancer with radiotherapy: should the entire seminal vesicles be included in the clinical target volume?

PURPOSE

When treating high-risk prostate cancer with radiation therapy, inclusion of the seminal vesicles (SVs) within the clinical target volume (CTV) can dramatically increase the volume of radiated normal tissues and hinder dose escalation. Because cancer may involve only the proximal portion of the frequently lengthy SVs, we performed a complete pathology review of prostatectomy specimens to determine the appropriate length of SV to include within the CTV when SV treatment is indicated.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A detailed pathologic analysis was performed for 344 radical prostatectomy specimens (1987-2000). All slides from each case were reviewed by a single pathologist (N.S.G.). Factors recorded for each case included length of each SV (cm), length of cancer involvement in each SV (cm) measured from the prostate-SV junction, and percentage of SV length involved.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients (15%) demonstrated SV involvement in 81 SVs (21 unilateral, 30 bilateral SV involvement). The median SV length was 3.5 cm (range: 0.7-8.5 cm). Factors associated with SV involvement included the pretreatment PSA level, biopsy Gleason score, and clinical T classification. The commonly used risk group stratification was very effective at predicting SV positivity. Only 1% of low-risk patients (PSA <10 ng/mL, Gleason <or=6, and clinical stage <or=T2a) demonstrated SV involvement vs. 27% of high-risk patients. Patients with only one high-risk feature still demonstrated a 15% risk of SV involvement, whereas 58% of patients with all three high-risk features had positive SVs. The median length of SV involvement was 1.0 cm (90th percentile: 2.0 cm, range: 0.2-3.8 cm). A median of 25% of each SV was involved with adenocarcinoma (90th percentile: 54%, range: 4%-75%). For the 81 positive SVs, no factor was associated with a greater length or percentage of SV involvement. In the entire population, 7% had SV involvement beyond 1.0 cm. There was an approximate 1% risk of SV involvement beyond 2.0 cm or 60% of the SV. In addition, this risk was less than 4% for all subgroups, including high-risk patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A portion of the SV should be included in the CTV only for higher-risk patients (PSA >or=10 ng/mL, biopsy Gleason >or=7, or clinical T stage >or=T2b). When treating the SV for prostate cancer, only the proximal 2.0-2.5 cm (approximately 60%) of the SV should be included within the CTV.

A dose-volume histogram analysis of the seminal vesicles in men treated with conformal radiotherapy to 'prostate alone'

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There is no consensus on whether the seminal vesicles should be included in the clinical target volume (CTV) for radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer. To inform the debate, we have undertaken a dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis of the seminal vesicles in patients treated with escalated dose conformal radiation to 'prostate alone'.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-five consecutive patients receiving conformal radiation to the prostate, to a dose of 75.6 Gy in 42 daily fractions, were studied. The CTV was defined as the prostate only, and the planning target volume (PTV) was defined by a 10 mm margin, except posteriorly where the margin was 7 mm. DVHs were calculated for the entire seminal vesicles, and for 6 mm segments through the seminal vesicles.

RESULTS

Incorporating a correction for organ motion, the D90 (minimum dose received by 90% of the volume of interest) for the most inferior 6 mm volume of the seminal vesicles (SV1) ranged from 25 to 70 Gy, and the percentage volume of SV1 receiving 50 Gy ranged from 47-100%. Using a D90 of 50 Gy as a cut-off, eight of the 25 patients had unacceptably low-dose coverage of SV1.

CONCLUSIONS

Escalated dose conformal radiation to the 'prostate alone' does not ensure adequate dose coverage of even the most inferior 6 mm of the seminal vesicles. We consider such treatment acceptable in patients at low risk of seminal vesicle involvement (T1/2ab, Gleason < or = 7, PSA < 10 ng/ml). In higher risk patients, if it is deemed necessary to treat the possibility of sub-clinical seminal vesicle involvement, this should be reflected in the definition of the CTV.

Three-dimensional computed tomography-guided monotherapeutic pararectal brachytherapy of prostate cancer with seminal vesicle invasion

PURPOSE

To treat patients with prostate cancer and seminal vesicle invasion with monotherapeutic three dimensional computed tomography (3-DCT)-guided posterior pararectal brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Three hundred and sixty two patients with clinical stage T1 a,b or T2 a,b of prostate cancer were referred for 3-DCT-guided brachytherapy. Each underwent ftirther staging with 3-D CT-guided pararectal biopsy of the seminal vesicles under local anesthesia during the pre-treatment CT-planning. Forty-three patients (12%) were upstaged to T3 cNoMo disease. In the set of 43 patients, Eight had Gleason's score< or =6, 24 Gleason's score=7, and 11 patients > or =8. Initial PSA was <10 ng/ml in 14 patients, 10-20 ng/ml in 11 patients, and >20 in 18 patients. Of the 43 patients, 37 patients were treated monotherapeutically with 3-D CT-guided brachytherapy. No patients received hormone therapy after the implant. The prescribed dosage to the seminal vesicles and prostate is 120 Gy with Pd-103 seeds and 144 Gy with 1-125 seeds.

RESULTS

The prescribed dosage was achieved in all 37 patient's throughout the seminal vesicles whose range of target radiation extended 5-10 mm outside the target in the adjacent fat as calculated with post-implant CT-dosimetry with Varian Brachy Vision or MMS software. Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) outcome data were available in 34 patients treated with monotherapy and follow up ranged from 12-56 months (median, 24 months). Decreased PSA levels were stratified into six groups based on the presenting Gleason's score and initial PSA. In the first group (with Gleason's score< or =6 and initial PSA <20 ng/ml), PSA levels decreased to less than 0.5 ng/ml in all seven patients (100%) after brachytherapy. In the second group (with Gleason's=7 and initial PSA<20 ng/ml), PSA levels decreased to less than 1 ng/ml in 11 of 13 patients (85%); additionally PSA levels decreased to less than 0.5 ng/ml in ten patients (77% in this group). In the third group (with Gleason's score=7 and initial PSA> 20 ng/ml), PSA decreased to less than 0.5 ng/ml in four out of eight patients (50%). All of the patients in the fourth group (with Gleason's score> or =8 and initial PSA<20 ng/ml) decreased their PSA levels to less than 0.5 ng/ml in three of three patients. PSA decreased less than 0.5 ng/ml in two out of three patients (67% in the last group with Gleason's score> or =8 and initial PSA> 20 ng/ml). There were no patients with Gleason's score of 1-6 and greater than 20 ng/ml initial PSA. Patients, irrespective of the Gleason's score and PSA, had an overall response of decreased PSA (less than 1 ng/ml) of 79%.

CONCLUSION

3-D CT-guided brachytherapy delivers adequate dosage to the seminal vesicles. Clinical and biochemical results are encouraging in patients with low initial PSA levels regardless of their Gleason's scores, but longer-term data in a greater number of patients is necessary.