A comparison of different intensity modulation treatment techniques for tangential breast irradiation

Contralateral breast dose with electronic compensators and conventional tangential fields - A clinical dosimetric study

Dose to the contralateral breast (CLB) from radiotherapy treatment has the potential to induce secondary breast cancer. Electronic tissue compensation (eComp) for breast cancer patients is one of the alternative methods to conventional 3D-conformal radiotherapy that eliminates the use of wedges. Several studies have investigated dose to the CLB using tangential fields involving wedges, intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc radiation therapy and various other techniques via treatment planning system calculations, Monte Carlo methods and phantoms. However, there are limited data published in assessing the actual dose received by the CLB from treatment with eComp-based tangential fields. In this study, the CLB dose for patients undergoing tangential field radiotherapy with eComp and enhanced dynamic wedged (standard) tangential fields was measured and compared to assess the CLB dose between the two methods. Measurements were conducted on a randomised trial of 40 patients, 20 of them had undergone standard planning, and the remaining 20 were treated with eComp. The mean surface dose measured with TLDs at 3cm from the medial tangential border for eComp and standard techniques was 10.04±1.37% and 10.14±2.05%, respectively for a prescription dose of 2.65Gy/fraction. The estimated dose at 1cm depth in tissue, measured with the use of perspex domes placed over the TLD at the same location, was 5.12±0.87% and 6.29±2.01% for eComp and standard, respectively. The CLB dose is dependent on the proximity of the medial tangential field edge to the contralateral breast and is patient-specific. The results of this study show that at 1cm depth, eComp technique delivers significantly less dose (p<0.05) to the CLB as compared to standard tangential fields. Furthermore, the surface dose measured for both eComp and standard are comparable indicating that the eComp-based tangential field technique does not contribute any excess dose to CLB when compared to standard tangential fields. The excess relative risk (ERR) for radiation-induced cancers for eComp was found to be 0.08, compared to 0.11 for standard tangential fields.

Comparison of skin doses of treated and contralateral breasts during whole breast radiotherapy for different treatment techniques using optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters

Purpose:

To measure and compare the skin doses received by treated left breast and contralateral breast (CB) during whole breast radiotherapy using five treatment techniques in an indigenously prepared wax breast phantom.

Materials and methods:

Computed tomography (CT) images of the breast phantom were used for treatment planning and comparison of skin dose calculated from treatment planning system (TPS) with measured dose. Planning target volume (PTV) and the CB were drawn arbitrarily on the CT images acquired for the breast phantom with 10 numbers of calibrated optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters (OSLDs) fixed on the surface of both breasts. The TPS calculated surface doses of PTV breast and CB for five treatment planning techniques, viz., conventional wedge (CW), irregular surface compensator-based (ISC), field-in-field (FiF), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and rapid arc (RA) techniques were obtained for comparison. The plans were executed in Clinac iX Linear Accelerator with the OSLDs fixed at the same locations on the phantom as in simulation. The TPS calculated mean dose at the surface of the treated left breast and CB was noted for the 10 OSLDs from dose-volume histogram (DVH) and compared with the measured dose. Also, the mean chamber dose at the centre of the left breast was noted from the DVH for comparing with ion chamber measured dose.

Results:

With reference to the results, it is seen that the dose to the CB is lowest in ISC technique and FiF technique and greatest in IMRT technique. The CW technique also delivered a dose comparable to IMRT to the CB of the phantom. The dose to the surface of PTV breast was highest and comparable in CW plans and FiF plans (68% and 67%) and lowest in IMRT and RA plans (50% each).

Findings:

Analysis of the results shows that the FiF and ISC techniques are preferred while planning breast radiotherapy due to the reduced dose to the CB.

Comparison between the four-field box and field-in-field techniques for conformal radiotherapy of the esophagus using dose-volume histograms and normal tissue complication probabilities

PURPOSE

We evaluated and compared the performance of the field-in-field (FIF) to that of the four-field box (4FB) technique regarding dosimetric and radiobiological parameters for radiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty patients with esophageal cancer were selected. For each patient, two treatment plans were created: 4FB and FIF. The parameters compared included the conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), D _mean, D _max, tumor control probability (TCP), V _20Gy and V _30Gy of the heart and lungs, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), and monitor units per fraction (MU/fr).

RESULTS

A paired t-test analysis did not show any significant differences (p > 0.05) between the two techniques in terms of the CI and TCP. However, the HI significantly improved when the FIF was applied. D _max of the PTV, lung, and spinal cord were also significantly better with the FIF. Moreover, the lung V _20Gy as well as the NTCPs of the lung and spinal cord significantly reduced when the FIF was used, and the MU/fr was significantly decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

The FIF showed evident advantages over 4FB: a more homogeneous dose distribution, lower D _max values, and fewer required MUs, while it also retained PTV dose conformality. FIF should be considered as a simple technique to use clinically in cases with esophageal malignancies, especially in clinics with no IMRT.

Setup Error and Effectiveness of Weekly Image-Guided Radiation Therapy of TomoDirect for Early Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

This study investigated setup error and effectiveness of weekly image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) of TomoDirect for early breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and fifty-one breasts of 147 consecutive patients who underwent breast conserving surgery followed by whole breast irradiation using TomoDirect in 2012 and 2013 were evaluated. All patients received weekly IGRT. The weekly setup errors from simulation to each treatment in reference to chest wall and surgical clips were measured. Random, systemic, and 3-dimensional setup errors were assessed. Extensive setup error was defined as 5 mm above the margin in any directions.

RESULTS

All mean errors were within 3 mm of all directions. The mean angle of gantry shifts was 0.6°. The mean value of absolute 3-dimensional setup error was 4.67 mm. In multivariate analysis, breast size (odds ratio, 2.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.00 to 7.90) was a significant factor for extensive error. The largest significant deviation of setup error was observed in the first week of radiotherapy (p < 0.001) and the deviations gradually decreased with time. The deviation of setup error was 5.68 mm in the first week and within 5 mm after the second week.

CONCLUSION

In this study, there was a significant association between breast size and significant setup error in breast cancer patients who received TomoDirect. The largest deviation occurred in the first week of treatment. Therefore, patients with large breasts should be closely observed on every fraction and fastidious attention is required in the first fraction of IGRT.

Statistical modeling approach to quantitative analysis of interobserver variability in breast contouring

PURPOSE

To develop a new approach for interobserver variability analysis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eight radiation oncologists specializing in breast cancer radiation therapy delineated a patient's left breast "from scratch" and from a template that was generated using deformable image registration. Three of the radiation oncologists had previously received training in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group consensus contouring for breast cancer atlas. The simultaneous truth and performance level estimation algorithm was applied to the 8 contours delineated "from scratch" to produce a group consensus contour. Individual Jaccard scores were fitted to a beta distribution model. We also applied this analysis to 2 or more patients, which were contoured by 9 breast radiation oncologists from 8 institutions.

RESULTS

The beta distribution model had a mean of 86.2%, standard deviation (SD) of ±5.9%, a skewness of -0.7, and excess kurtosis of 0.55, exemplifying broad interobserver variability. The 3 RTOG-trained physicians had higher agreement scores than average, indicating that their contours were close to the group consensus contour. One physician had high sensitivity but lower specificity than the others, which implies that this physician tended to contour a structure larger than those of the others. Two other physicians had low sensitivity but specificity similar to the others, which implies that they tended to contour a structure smaller than the others. With this information, they could adjust their contouring practice to be more consistent with others if desired. When contouring from the template, the beta distribution model had a mean of 92.3%, SD ± 3.4%, skewness of -0.79, and excess kurtosis of 0.83, which indicated a much better consistency among individual contours. Similar results were obtained for the analysis of 2 additional patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed statistical approach was able to measure interobserver variability quantitatively and to identify individuals who tended to contour differently from the others. The information could be useful as feedback to improve contouring consistency.

Feasibility of using nonflat photon beams for whole-breast irradiation with breath hold

Removing a flattening filter or replacing it with a thinner filter alters the characteristics of a photon beam, creating a forward peaked intensity profile to make the photon beam nonflat. This study is to investigate the feasibility of applying nonflat photon beams to the whole-breast irradiation with breath holds for a potential of delivery time reduction during the gated treatment. Photon beams of 6 MV with flat and nonflat intensity profiles were commissioned. Fifteen patients with early-stage breast cancer, who received whole-breast radiation without breathing control, were retrospectively selected for this study. For each patient, three plans were created using a commercial treatment planning system: (a) the clinically approved plan using forward planning method (FP); (b) a hybrid intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plan where the flat beam open fields were combined with the nonflat beam IMRT fields using direct aperture optimization method (mixed DAO); (c) a hybrid IMRT plan where both open and IMRT fields were from nonflat beams using direct aperture optimization (nonflat DAO). All plans were prescribed for ≥ 95% of the breast volume receiving the prescription dose of 50 Gy (2.0 Gy per fraction). In comparison, all plans achieved a similar dosimetric coverage to the targeted volume. The average homogeneity index of the FP, mixed DAO, and nonflat DAO plans were 0.882 ± 0.024, 0.879 ± 0.023, and 0.867 ± 0.027, respectively. The average percentage volume of V105 was 57.66% ± 5.21%, 34.67% ± 4.91%, 41.64% ± 5.32% for the FP, mixed, and nonflat DAO plans, respectively. There was no significant difference (p &gt; 0.05) observed for the defined endpoint doses in organs at risk (OARs). In conclusion, both mixed DAO and nonflat DAO plans can achieve similar plan quality as the clinically approved FP plan, measured by plan homogeneity and endpoint doses to the ORAs. Nonflat beam plans may reduce treatment time in breath-hold treatment, especially for hypofractionated treatment.

Comparison of different breast planning techniques and algorithms for radiation therapy treatment

This work aims at investigating the impact of treating breast cancer using different radiation therapy (RT) techniques--forwardly-planned intensity-modulated, f-IMRT, inversely-planned IMRT and dynamic conformal arc (DCART) RT--and their effects on the whole-breast irradiation and in the undesirable irradiation of the surrounding healthy tissues. Two algorithms of iPlan BrainLAB treatment planning system were compared: Pencil Beam Convolution (PBC) and commercial Monte Carlo (iMC). Seven left-sided breast patients submitted to breast-conserving surgery were enrolled in the study. For each patient, four RT techniques--f-IMRT, IMRT using 2-fields and 5-fields (IMRT2 and IMRT5, respectively) and DCART - were applied. The dose distributions in the planned target volume (PTV) and the dose to the organs at risk (OAR) were compared analyzing dose-volume histograms; further statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS v20 software. For PBC, all techniques provided adequate coverage of the PTV. However, statistically significant dose differences were observed between the techniques, in the PTV, OAR and also in the pattern of dose distribution spreading into normal tissues. IMRT5 and DCART spread low doses into greater volumes of normal tissue, right breast, right lung and heart than tangential techniques. However, IMRT5 plans improved distributions for the PTV, exhibiting better conformity and homogeneity in target and reduced high dose percentages in ipsilateral OAR. DCART did not present advantages over any of the techniques investigated. Differences were also found comparing the calculation algorithms: PBC estimated higher doses for the PTV, ipsilateral lung and heart than the iMC algorithm predicted.

Current clinical coverage of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group-defined target volumes for postmastectomy radiation therapy

PURPOSE

The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) has published consensus guidelines for contouring relevant anatomy for postmastectomy radiation therapy (RT). How these contours relate to current treatment practices is unknown. We analyzed the dose-volume histograms (DVHs) for these contours using current clinical practice at University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and compared them with the proposed treatment plans to treat RTOG-defined targets to full dose.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively analyzed treatment plans for 20 consecutive women treated with postmastectomy RT for which the treatment targets were the chest wall (CW), level III axilla (Ax3), supraclavicular (SCV), and internal mammary (IM) nodes. The RTOG consensus definitions were used to contour the following anatomic structures: CW; level I, II, and III axillary nodes (Ax1, Ax2, Ax3); SCV; IM; and heart (H). DVHs for these contours and the ipsilateral lung were generated from clinically designed treatment that had actually been delivered to each patient. For comparison regarding dose to normal tissue, new treatment plans were generated with the goal of covering 95% of the anatomic contours to 45 Gy.

RESULTS

The prescribed dose was 50 Gy in each case. The mean percent of volumes that received 45 Gy (V45) for the RTOG guideline-based contours were CW 74%, Ax1 84%, Ax2 88%, Ax3 96%, SCV 84%, and IM 80%. Mean heart V10 values were 11% for treatment of left-sided tumors and 6% for right-sided tumors. Mean ipsilateral lung V20 values were 28% for left-sided tumors and 34% for right-sided tumors. For the contour-based plans, mean V45 values were CW 94%, Ax1 95%, Ax2 97%, Ax3 98%, SCV 98%, and IM 85%. Mean heart V10 values were 14% for treatment of left-sided tumors and 12% for right-sided tumors. Mean ipsilateral lung V20 values were 32% for left-sided tumors and 45% for right-sided tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically derived treatment plans, which have proven efficacy and are the current standard, cover 74% to 96% of the anatomy-based RTOG consensus volumes to the prescription dose. This discrepancy should be considered if treatment planning protocol guidelines are designed to incorporate these new definitions.

Dosimetric evaluation of breast radiotherapy in a dynamic phantom

This phantom study quantifies changes in delivered dose due to respiratory motion for four breast radiotherapy planning techniques: three intensity-modulated techniques (forward-planned, surface-compensated and hybrid intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)); using a combination of open fields and inverse planned IMRT) and a 2D conventional technique. The plans were created on CT images of a wax breast phantom with a cork lung insert, and dose distributions were measured using films inserted through slits in the axial and sagittal planes. Films were irradiated according to each plan under a static (modeling breathhold) and three dynamic conditions--isocenter set at mid-respiratory cycle with motion amplitudes of 1 and 2 cm and at end-cycle with 2 cm motion amplitude (modeling end-exhale). Differences between static and moving deliveries were most pronounced for the more complex planning techniques with hot spots of up to 107% appearing in the anterior portion of all three IMRT plans at the largest motion at the end-exhale set-up. The delivered dose to the moving phantom was within 5% of that to the static phantom for all cases, while measurement accuracy was ±3%. The homogeneity index was significantly decreased only for the 2 cm motion end-exhale set-up; however, this same motion increased the equivalent uniform dose because of improved posterior breast coverage. Overall, the study demonstrates that the effect of respiratory motion is negligible for all planning techniques except in occasional instances of large motion.

Quantification of cold spots caused by geometrical uncertainty in field-in-field techniques for whole breast radiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the cold spot under geometrical uncertainties in field-in-field techniques for whole breast radiotherapy.

METHODS

Ten consecutive patients from both the left- and right-sided treatment site groups who received whole breast radiotherapy with the field-in-field technique were included. Virtual plans were made with moving isocenters to the posterior direction having two amplitudes (5 and 10 mm) and prescribing the same monitor unit as the original plan (FIF_5 and FIF_10). The planning target volume for evaluation was defined by subtracting the areas within 5 mm from the skin and within 5 mm from the lung from the whole breast. The differences in V90, V95 and D98 of planning target volume for evaluation were measured between the original and virtual plans. As a reference, the same measurements were taken for the wedge techniques (Wedge_5 and Wedge_10).

RESULTS

The differences in V95 were -0.2% on FIF_5, -1.7% on FIF_10, -0.5% on Wedge_5 and -1.5% on Wedge_10. The differences in V90 were -0.02% on FIF_5, -0.3% on FIF_10, -0.05% on Wedge_5 and -0.1% on Wedge_10. The differences in D98 were 0 Gy on FIF_5, -0.1 Gy on FIF_10, -0.2 Gy on Wedge_5 and -0.4 Gy on Wedge_10. The differences in D98 between the original plans and virtual scenarios for field-in-field techniques were significantly smaller than those for wedge techniques, but there were no statically significant differences in V90 and V95.

CONCLUSIONS

The quantity of the cold spots caused by the geometrical uncertainties in field-in-field techniques was similar to that for the wedge techniques and was acceptable.

Automating RTOG-defined target volumes for postmastectomy radiation therapy

PURPOSE

Consistency in defining and contouring target structures in radiation therapy (RT) is critical for highly conformal RT, for evaluating treatment plans, and for quality assurance in multi-institutional RT trials. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) has published consensus guidelines for contouring targets for postmastectomy RT. To aid in contouring such structures, we evaluated the potential use of an automated contouring technique, known as deformable image registration-based breast segmentation (DEF-SEG).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The RTOG definitions were used to contour the chest wall (CW); levels I, II, and III axillary nodes (Ax1, Ax2, Ax3); supraclavicular (SCV) nodes; internal mammary (IM) nodes; and the heart. Left-sided and right-sided templates were created. The DEF-SEG was then used to generate auto-segmented contours from the appropriate template to computed tomographic scans of 20 test cases (10 left, 10 right). To assess the accuracy of this method, those contours were manually modified as necessary to match the RTOG definitions, and the extent of the overlap was compared. The dosimetric impact of the difference in contours was then evaluated by comparing dose-volume histograms for modified and unmodified contours.

RESULTS

Mean volume-overlap ratios between the unmodified DEF-SEG-generated contours and modified contours were as follows: CW, 0.91; Ax1, 0.68; Ax2, 0.64; Ax3, 0.68; SCV node, 0.66; IM node, 0.32, and the heart, 0.93. Mean differences in volume receiving 45 Gy (V45) for the modified versus unmodified contours were as follows: CW, 2.1%; SCV node, 4.8%; Ax1, 5.1%; Ax2, 5.6%; Ax3, 3.0%; and IM node, 10.1%. Mean differences in V10 between the modified heart and the unmodified heart were 0.4% for right-sided treatment and 0.5% for left-sided treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The DEF-SEG can be helpful for delineating structures according to the RTOG consensus guidelines, particularly for the CW and the heart. No clinically significant dosimetric differences were found between the modified and unmodified contours. The DEF-SEG may be useful for evaluating treatment plans for postmastectomy RT in multi-institutional trials.

The inter- and intrafraction reproducibilities of three common IMRT delivery techniques

PURPOSE

Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment delivery requires higher precision than conventional 3D treatment delivery because of the sensitivity of the resulting dose to small geometric misalignment of the modulated beamlets. The chosen treatment delivery technique will affect the treatment precision in different ways, based on the characteristics of the delivery method. Delivery using a multileaf collimator (MLC) can reduce treatment time and therapist workload, but typically requires a greater number of monitor units and the fields are prone to both systematic and random leaf positioning errors. An alternative to MLC-based fields, patient specific brass compensators, do not suffer from these leaf positioning errors. In our study, we set out to investigate which delivery method will provide the highest levels of dosimetric reproducibility and the minimum amount of interfraction variability.

METHODS

In our study, a seven field IMRT plan for a head and neck treatment was created using the Pinnacle3 treatment planning system and the intensity maps for each field were obtained. The intensity maps of the fields were delivered with a Varian 2100C/D linear accelerator, using solid compensators and sliding window (SW) and step-and-shoot (SS) MLC segments. Three fields were selected from the seven-beam IMRT plan for comparison. Analysis was carried out using the MatriXX ion chamber array, radiochromic film, and Varian dynalog files.

RESULTS

Our results show that the error in MLC leaf positioning has no gantry angle dependence. The compensator and SW deliveries showed excellent agreement, even when stricter than usual gamma criteria were applied. However, we noted that under these strict conditions, the SS field had at least ten times more pixels out of range than did the compensators. When using step-and-shoot MLC fields, it was observed that the increase in dose rate or the increase of MU/segment degrades the quality of the plan. Analysis of the dynalog files showed that while each individual field had its own propensity for error, all fields showed the same trend: a greater percentage of time the leaves are out of position as dose rate increases, MUs decrease, or both.

CONCLUSIONS

The compensator-based field and both types of MLC-based fields have MatriXX results that are within the clinically acceptable tolerance of 3% dose difference and 2 mm DTA. However, when the criteria are tightened, it becomes evident that the compensators have a definite advantage over their comparable MLC-based competitors in terms of interfraction reproducibility. Fewer monitor units are required to deliver each portal, potentially improving patient outcomes and reducing unwanted side effects to both patients and therapists. In centers without MLC, compensators represent a simple and cost effective way to offer patients state of the art treatment. Based on the results of this study, compensator-based IMRT is a reliable, viable option for use in clinics both with and without MLC-equipped linacs.

Effect of collimator and couch angle change on breast IMRT dose distributions

Intensity‐modulated tangential photon beams for breast cancer treatment can improve the dose uniformity significantly throughout the whole breast and reduce the dose to the lung and the heart when compared to the conventional technique. Before the first treatment, patient setup may require a change on the collimator angle and/or the couch angle based on the chest wall coverage according to the port films. The objective of this work is to investigate the effects of the collimator and the couch angle change on the dose distribution for breast cancer treatment using intensity‐modulated tangential photon beams, and to determine the clinical acceptable range of the angle change for routine treatment. Ten breast cases treated with intensity‐modulated tangential photon beams were analyzed in this study. Patient‐specific CT data and the radiation therapy planning (RTP) files obtained from our in‐house Monte Carlo based breast IMRT treatment planning system were used for IMRT dose recalculation with collimator or couch angle changes. The isodose distributions and DVHs were compared with the original plans, and the effects of the collimator and couch angle change to breast IMRT dose distributions were evaluated. Our results show that a 4° change in the collimator angle or the couch angle did not affect the dose distribution significantly and it is acceptable in the clinic for patient treatment.

PACS number: 87.10.Rt

Assessment and minimization of contralateral breast dose for conventional and intensity modulated breast radiotherapy

Breast radiotherapy is associated with an increased risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) in women under age 45 at the time of treatment. This risk increases with increasing absorbed dose to the contralateral breast. The use of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is expected to substantially reduce the dose to the contralateral breast by eliminating scattered radiation from physical beam modifiers. The absorbed dose to the contralateral breast was measured for 5 common radiotherapy techniques, including paired 15 degrees wedges, lateral 30 degrees wedge only, custom-designed physical compensators, aperture based (field-within-field) IMRT with segments chosen by the planner, and inverse planned IMRT with segments chosen by a leaf sequencing algorithm after dose volume histogram (DVH)-based fluence map optimization. Further reduction in contralateral breast dose through the use of lead shielding was also investigated. While shielding was observed to have the most profound impact on surface dose, the radiotherapy technique proved to be most important in determining internal dose. Paired wedges or compensators result in the highest contralateral breast doses (nearly 10% of the prescription dose on the medial surface), while use of IMRT or removal of the medial wedge results in significantly lower doses. Aperture-based IMRT results in the lowest internal doses, primarily due to the decrease in the number of monitor units required and the associated reduction in leakage dose. The use of aperture-based IMRT reduced the average dose to the contralateral breast by greater than 50% in comparison to wedges or compensators. Combined use of IMRT and 1/8-inch-thick lead shielding reduced the dose to the interior and surface of the contralateral breast by roughly 60% and 85%, respectively. This reduction may warrant the use of IMRT for younger patients who have a statistically significant risk of contralateral breast cancer associated with breast radiotherapy.

Automatic segmentation of whole breast using atlas approach and deformable image registration

PURPOSE

To compare interobserver variations in delineating the whole breast for treatment planning using two contouring methods.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Autosegmented contours were generated by a deformable image registration-based breast segmentation method (DEF-SEG) by mapping the whole breast clinical target volume (CTVwb) from a template case to a new patient case. Eight breast radiation oncologists modified the autosegmented contours as necessary to achieve a clinically appropriate CTVwb and then recontoured the same case from scratch for comparison. The times to complete each approach, as well as the interobserver variations, were analyzed. The template case was also mapped to 10 breast cancer patients with a body mass index of 19.1-35.9 kg/m(2). The three-dimensional surface-to-surface distances and volume overlapping analyses were computed to quantify contour variations.

RESULTS

The median time to edit the DEF-SEG-generated CTVwb was 12.9 min (range, 3.4-35.9) compared with 18.6 min (range, 8.9-45.2) to contour the CTVwb from scratch (30% faster, p = 0.028). The mean surface-to-surface distance was noticeably reduced from 1.6 mm among the contours generated from scratch to 1.0 mm using the DEF-SEG method (p = 0.047). The deformed contours in 10 patients achieved 94% volume overlap before correction and required editing of 5% (range, 1-10%) of the contoured volume.

CONCLUSION

Significant interobserver variations suggested a lack of consensus regarding the CTVwb, even among breast cancer specialists. Using the DEF-SEG method produced more consistent results and required less time. The DEF-SEG method can be successfully applied to patients with different body mass indexes.

An investigation into methods of IMRT planning applied to breast radiotherapy

The purpose of this study was to investigate methods used to modulate dose distributions in radiotherapy planning, to determine the fundamental features of these and to establish the attainable dose uniformity. Published modulation methods were categorized, and a simple physical model devised to predict the weight of the wedged beam and the relative dose distribution for each category. Each technique was applied to patient data with planning target volume sizes ranging from below 500 cm(3) to 2200 cm(3). The spatial distribution of high-dose regions in the breast, and maximum dose for the heart and lung, were determined for each plan. The dose uniformity was analysed by evaluating the volume of the breast (V(I)) receiving <95% and <105% of the prescribed dose. The difference between V(105%) and V(95%) for each method for each patient data set was also calculated. The simple model predicted the trend in percentage weight of the wedge beam and the form of the dose distribution in the transverse plane with the modulation method. Improvements in the dose uniformity were seen for the majority of modulation methods. The magnitude of the change was between 5.6% and 11.1% (p<0.05) of the breast volume for breast sizes above 500 cm(3). Some modulation methods introduced high dose at the chest wall. In conclusion, the majority of the methods improved dose uniformity for breast sizes of 500 cm(3) or greater. No method showed a clear advantage over the others. The use of modulation methods should be governed by consideration of its effects relative to a simple wedge plan.

The value of EDR2 film dosimetry in compensator-based intensity modulated radiation therapy

Radiographic or silver halide film is a well-established 2D dosimeter with an unquestioned spatial resolution. But its higher sensitivity to low-energy photons has to be taken into consideration. Metal compensators or physical modulators to deliver intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) are known to change the beam energy spectrum and to produce scattered photons and contaminating electrons. Therefore the reliability of film dosimetry in compensator-based IMRT might be questioned. Conflicting data have been reported in the literature. This uncertainty about the validity of film dosimetry in compensator-based IMRT triggered us to conduct this study. First, the effect of MCP-96 compensators of varying thickness on the depth dose characteristics was investigated using a diamond detector which has a uniform energy response. A beam hardening effect was observed at 6 MV that resulted in a depth dose increase that remained below 2% at 20 cm depth. At 25 MV, in contrast, beam softening produced a dose decrease of up to 5% at the same depth. Second, dose was measured at depth using EDR2 film in perpendicular orientation to both 6 MV and 25 MV beams for different compensator thicknesses. A film dose underresponse of 1.1% was found for a 30 mm thick block in a 25 MV beam, which realized a transmission factor of 0.243. The effect induced by the compensators is higher than the experimental error but still within the accepted overall uncertainty of film dosimetry in clinical IMRT QA. With radiographic film as an affordable QA tool, the physical compensator remains a low threshold technique to deliver IMRT.

Optimized Dose Coverage of Regional Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer: The Role of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To determine whether the use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) would lead to improved dosimetry for the breast and regional nodes.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ten patients with left-sided breast cancer were selected. The clinical target volume included left breast and internal mammillary (IM), supraclavicular (SC), and axillary (AX) nodes. The critical structures included heart, right and left lungs, contralateral breast, esophagus, thyroid, and humeral head. Conventional and a series of IMRT plans were generated for comparison.

RESULTS

The average heart D(3) was reduced from 31.4 +/- 18.9 with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) to 15 +/- 7.2 Gy with 9-field (9-FLD IMRT). The average left lung D(30) was also decreased from 27.9 +/- 11.5 Gy (3D-CRT) to 12.6 +/- 8.2 Gy (9-FLD IMRT). The average contralateral breast D(2) was reduced from 4.4 +/- 5.3 Gy (3D-CRT) to 1.8 +/- 1.2 Gy (4-FLD IMRT). Esophagus D(2) was increased from 9.3 +/- 8.1 Gy (3D-CRT) to 29.4 +/- 5.4 (9-FLD IMRT); thyroid D(50) was increased from 0.9 +/- 0.6 Gy (3D-CRT) to 11.9 +/- 6.6 (9-FLD IMRT); humeral head D(2) was increased from 36.1 +/- 13.1 Gy (3D-CRT) to 39.9 +/- 6.5 (9-FLD IMRT).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of IMRT improves breast and regional node coverage while decreasing doses to the lungs, heart, and contralateral breast when compared with 3D-CRT. Doses to esophagus, thyroid, and humeral head, however, were increased with IMRT.

A rod matrix compensator for small-field intensity modulated radiation therapy: a preliminary phantom study

A compensator made of a tungsten-based rod matrix has been proposed for small-field intensity modulated radiation therapy. The compensator was attached to a 6 MV linac gantry head. The proposed compensator could modulate the X-ray intensity with a step of 10% and a minimum transmission of 2.5%.

A study on contralateral breast surface dose for various tangential field techniques and the impact of set-up error on this dose

The risk of inducing contralateral breast (CLB) cancer in patients undergoing tangential field irradiation for the treatment of breast cancer is a serious concern in radiation oncology. A bilateral breast phantom made of wax attached onto the Alderson Rando phantom was used for studying the CLB dose for techniques using physical wedges, EDWs, IMRT and open fields. The skin dose to the CLB was measured at four different points (3 cm from the medial border of the tangential field (P1), nipple (P3), axilla (P4), midpoint between P3 and P1 (P2)). The highest measured dose occurred at P1 with the 60 degrees physical wedges; it was 15.3% of the dose at isocentre. Similarly, the dose measured at P3 (nipple) with 60 degrees physical wedges was 1.90 times higher than the dose with 60 degrees EDWs. The dose at P1 for IMRT (7.8%) was almost the same as that for the open field (8.7%). The skin dose measured at the nipple was 2.1 - 10.9 % of the isocentre dose. The highest CLB doses were contributed by medial wedged fields. The dose to the CLB can be reduced by using IMRT or avoiding wedging the medial tangential fields. A set-up error in the longitudinal direction has little impact on the CLB dose. Set-up errors > 1 cm in the vertical and lateral directions have significant impact on the CLB dose.

Direct aperture optimization–based intensity-modulated radiotherapy for whole breast irradiation

PURPOSE

To investigate the technical and dosimetric advantages and the efficacy of direct aperture optimized intensity-modulated radiation therapy (DAO-IMRT) over standard (e.g., beamlet optimized) IMRT and conventional three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) for whole breast irradiation in supine and prone positions.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively designed DAO-IMRT plans for 15 breast cancer patients in supine (10 patients) and prone (5 patients) positions with a goal of uniform dose coverage of the whole breast. These DAO-IMRT plans were compared with standard IMRT using beamlet optimization and conventional 3D-CRT plans using wedges. All plans used opposed tangential beam arrangements.

RESULTS

In all cases, the DAO-IMRT plans were equal to or better than those generated with 3D-CRT and standard beamlet-IMRT. For supine cases, DAO-IMRT provided higher uniformity index (UI, defined as the ratio of the dose to 95% of breast volume to the maximum dose) than either 3D-CRT (0.88 vs. 0.82; p = 0.026) or beamlet-IMRT (0.89 vs. 0.85; p = 0.003). Direct aperture optimized IMRT also gave lower lung doses than either 3D-CRT (V20 = 7.9% vs. 8.6%; p = 0.024) or beamlet-IMRT (V20 = 8.4% vs. 9.7%; p = 0.0008) for supine patients. For prone patients, DAO-IMRT provided higher UI than either 3D-CRT (0.89 vs. 0.83; p = 0.027) or beamlet-IMRT (0.89 vs. 0.85; p = 0.003). The planning time for DAO-IMRT was approximately 75% less than that of 3D-CRT. The monitor units for DAO-IMRT were approximately 60% less than those of beamlet-IMRT.

CONCLUSION

Direct aperture optimized IMRT improved the overall quality of dose distributions as well as the planning and delivery efficiency for treating whole breast in both supine and prone positions.

Contralateral breast doses following radiotherapy of the breast and regional lymph nodes: Measurements and treatment planning calculations

PURPOSE

To measure the dose distribution in the contralateral breast (CB) following radiotherapy of the breast and regional lymph nodes by a 4-field technique, and to examine whether related treatment planning calculations of CB doses reproduce the measurements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CB doses were measured by thermoluminescence dosimetry on the surface of 8 patients and in an anthropomorphic phantom. Dose calculations at corresponding points of interest were performed by the treatment planning system Helax-TMS 6.1 using the pencil beam or the collapsed cone algorithm.

RESULTS

The measured CB doses were typically between 1% and 15% of the prescribed dose. The dose decreased significantly both in the medial-lateral and cranial-caudal direction. The average ratio of the measured to the calculated CB dose was about 0.7 and 0.9 for the pencil beam and the collapsed cone algorithm, respectively. One of the treatment fields aimed at the regional lymph nodes and some of the chest wall gave the highest contribution to the CB dose.

CONCLUSIONS

The dose distribution in the CB following locoregional radiotherapy of the breast and regional lymph nodes is quite inhomogeneous. The collapsed cone algorithm may be used for estimating doses to the CB. Some concern is raised regarding the current field arrangement and the consequences for the CB dose.

Body radiation exposure in breast cancer radiotherapy: Impact of breast IMRT and virtual wedge compensation techniques

PURPOSE

Recent reports demonstrate a dramatically increased rate of secondary leukemia for breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant high-dose anthracycline and radiotherapy, and that radiation is an independent factor for the development of leukemia. This study aimed to evaluate the radiation body exposure during breast radiotherapy and to characterize the factors associated with an increased exposure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a prospective cohort of 120 women, radiation measurements were taken from four sites on the body at the time of adjuvant breast radiotherapy. Multiple regression analysis was performed to analyze patient and treatment factors associated with the amount of scattered radiation.

RESULTS

For standard 50 Gy breast radiotherapy, the minimal dose received by abdominal organs is on average 0.45 Gy, ranging from 0.06 to 1.55 Gy. The use of physical wedges as a compensation technique was the most significant factor associated with increased scattered dose (p < 0.001), resulting in approximately three times more exposure compared with breast intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and dynamic wedge.

CONCLUSIONS

The amount of radiation that is scattered to a patient's body is consistent with exposure reported to be associated with excess of leukemia. In accordance with the As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) principle, we recommend using breast IMRT or virtual wedging for the radiotherapy of breast cancer receiving high-dose anthracycline chemotherapy.

Does breast size affect the scatter dose to the ipsilateral lung, heart, or contralateral breast in primary breast irradiation using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)?

PURPOSE

To evaluate the relationship between the primary breast volume and dose received by the ipsilateral lung, heart (for left-breast cancers), and contralateral breast during primary breast irradiation using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Sixty-five patients with breast carcinoma were treated using 6-MV photons with IMRT technique using the Eclipse Planning System following breast conserving surgery. All patients had a treatment planning CT scan. The primary breast, ipsilateral lung, and heart were contoured on the axial CT slices. The primary breast volume was calculated using the Eclipse Planning System. The mean ipsilateral lung and heart doses were obtained from the dose-volume histogram. The contralateral breast dose was measured using paired thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) placed on the patient's contralateral breast, 4 cm from the center of the medial border of the primary breast irradiation field.

RESULTS

The mean dose delivered with photons to the primary breast for all patients was 49.97 Gy. The mean volume of the primary irradiated breast was 1167.9 cc. As a percentage, the mean ipsilateral lung, heart, and contralateral breast doses were 11.2%, 6.1%, and 7.2%, respectively. The primary breast volume positively correlated with the contralateral breast dose (P < 0.0005). There was no significant correlation between the breast volume and the ipsilateral lung or heart dose (P = 0.463 and 0.943, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the primary breast size significantly affects the scatter dose to the contralateral breast but not the ipsilateral lung or heart dose when using IMRT for breast irradiation.

Comparison of three concomitant boost techniques for early-stage breast cancer

PURPOSE

Whole breast radiotherapy (RT) followed by a tumor bed boost typically spans 5-6 weeks of treatment. Interest is growing in RT regimens, such as concomitant boost, that decrease overall treatment time, lessening the time/cost burden to patients and facilities.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Computed tomography (CT) scans from 20 cases were selected for this retrospective, dosimetric study to compare three different techniques of concomitant boost delivery: (1) standard tangents plus an electron boost, (2) intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) tangents using custom compensators plus an electron boost, and (3) IMRT tangents plus a conformal photon boost. The equivalent uniform dose model was used to compare the plans.

RESULTS

The average breast equivalent uniform dose value for the three techniques (standard, IMRT plus electrons, and IMRT plus photons) was 48.6, 47.9, and 48.3, respectively. The plans using IMRT more closely approximated the prescribed dose of 46 Gy to the whole breast. The breast volume receiving >110% of the dose was less with the IMRT tangents than with standard RT (p = 0.037), but no significant difference in the maximal dose or other evaluated parameters was noted.

CONCLUSION

Although the IMRT techniques delivered the prescribed dose with better dose uniformity, the small improvement seen did not support a goal of improved resource use.

Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) reduces the dose to the contralateral breast when compared to conventional tangential fields for primary breast irradiation

PURPOSE

To determine the dose received by the contralateral breast during primary breast irradiation using IMRT compared to conventional tangential field techniques.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between March 2003 and March 2004, 83 patients with breast carcinoma were treated using 6, 10, or mixed 6/18 MV photons (65 with tangential IMRT technique and 18 with 3-dimensional technique using tangential fields with wedges) for primary breast irradiation following breast-conserving surgery. Paired thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were placed on each patient's contralateral breast, 4 and 8 cm from the center of the medial border of the tangential field. The TLDs were left on the patient during a single fraction and then measured 24 h afterwards.

RESULTS

The mean dose delivered with photons to the primary breast for all patients was 4999 cGy (SD = 52) with a mean single fraction dose of 199 cGy (SD = 8). The mean percent of the prescribed dose to the contralateral breast measured at the 4- and 8-cm positions were 7.19% (SD = 2.28) and 4.63% (SD = 2.12), respectively, for patients treated with IMRT compared to 11.22% (SD = 2.73) and 10.70% (SD = 3.44), respectively, for the patients treated with conventional tangential field techniques. This represented a 36% and 57% reduction at the 4 and 8-cm contralateral positions, respectively, in the mean dose to the contralateral breast using IMRT compared to 3-D technique which was statistically significant (p < 0.0005, <0.0005, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Primary breast irradiation with tangential IMRT technique significantly reduces the dose to the contralateral breast compared to conventional tangential field techniques.

The incidence and functional consequences of RT-associated cardiac perfusion defects

PURPOSE

Radiation therapy (RT) for left-sided breast cancer has been associated with cardiac dysfunction. We herein assess the temporal nature and volume dependence of RT-induced left ventricular perfusion defects and whether these perfusion defects are related to changes in cardiac wall motion or alterations in ejection fraction.

METHODS

From 1998 to 2001, 114 patients were enrolled onto an IRB-approved prospective clinical study to assess changes in regional and global cardiac function after RT for left-sided breast cancer. Patients were imaged 30 to 60 minutes after injection of technetium 99m sestamibi or tetrofosmin. Post-RT perfusion scans were compared with the pre-RT studies to assess for RT-induced perfusion defects as well as functional changes in wall motion and ejection fraction. Two-tailed Fisher's exact test and the Cochran-Armitage test for linear trends were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The incidence of new perfusion defects 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after RT was 27%, 29%, 38%, and 42%, respectively. New defects occurred in approximately 10% to 20% and 50% to 60% of patients with less than 5%, and greater than 5%, of their left ventricle included within the RT fields, respectively (p = 0.33 to 0.00008). The rates of wall motion abnormalities in patients with and without perfusion defects were 12% to 40% versus 0% to 9%, respectively; p values were 0.007 to 0.16, depending on the post-RT interval.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation therapy causes volume-dependent perfusion defects in approximately 40% of patients within 2 years of RT. These perfusion defects are associated with corresponding wall-motion abnormalities. Additional study is necessary to better define the long-term functional consequences of RT-induced perfusion defects.

Inverse vs. forward breast IMRT planning

Breast intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) improves dose distribution homogeneity within the whole breast. Previous publications report the use of inverse or forward dose optimization algorithms. Because the inverse technique is not widely available in commercial treatment planning systems, it is important to compare the 2 algorithms. The goal of this work is to compare them on a prospective cohort of 30 patients. Dose distributions were evaluated on differential dose-volume histograms using the volumes receiving more than 105% (V(105)) and 110% (V(110)) of the prescribed dose, and on the maximum dose (D(max)) or hot spot and the sagittal dose gradient (SDG) being the gradient between the dose on inframammary crease and the dose prescribed. The data were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed rank test. The inverse planning significantly improves the V(105) (mean value 9.7% vs. 14.5%, p=0.002), and the V(110) (mean value 1.4% vs. 3.2%, p=0.006). However, the SDG is not statistically significantly different for either algorithm. Looking at the potential impact on skin acute reaction, although there is a significant reduction of V(110) using an inverse algorithm, it is unlikely this 1.6% volume reduction will present a significant clinical advantage over a forward algorithm. Both algorithms are equivalent in removing the hot spots on the inframammary fold, where acute skin reactions occur more frequently using a conventional wedge technique. Based on these results, we recommend that both forward and inverse algorithms should be considered for breast IMRT planning.

A packed building-block compensator (TETRIS-RT) and feasibility for IMRT delivery

A packed building-block compensator (TETRIS-RT) for IMRT (Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy) delivery has been proposed. The compensator contains two kinds of cubic blocks: x-ray absorbing blocks for intensity modulation and x-ray transparent blocks for packing. The packed blocks are placed inside a rectangular enclosure, and the resulting compensators can be attached to a linac gantry head through a rotatable mount for efficient multiportal IMRT. A fabrication device and a sorting device were also developed. The fabrication device can automatically stack two different types of blocks to produce a compensator while the sorting device can separate each type of the blocks for subsequent fabrication. Preliminary film experiments have shown that an additional leakage dose through the rounded edges of the ten-layered x-ray absorbing blocks was 0.9% of the delivered dose with a total shielded dose ratio of 10% including the peak leakage. It was observed that the proposed compensator may provide a highly modulated dose distribution. This suggests its feasibility for IMRT delivery with a limit of 1 cm x 1 cm spatial resolution at isocenter in the plane perpendicular to the beam, and larger discrete intensity steps of approximately 10% compared to conventional compensators. Advantages of the proposed compensator include that the compensator blocks are reusable and can be utilized to automatically and quickly fabricate a compensator, thereby minimizing human labor.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) reduces the dose to the contralateral breast when compared to conventional tangential fields for primary breast irradiation: initial report

PURPOSE

This study was designed to compare the dose received by the contralateral breast during primary breast irradiation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy with the dose received via conventional tangential field techniques.

METHODS/MATERIALS

Between March 2003 and March 2004, 44 patients with breast carcinoma were treated using 6-, 10-, or mixed 6/18-MV photons(36 with tangential intensity-modulated radiotherapy technique and eight with three-dimensional technique using tangential fields with wedges) for primary breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery. Paired thermoluminescent dosimeters were placed on each patient's contralateral breast, 4 cm from the center of the medial border of the tangential field. The thermoluminescent dosimeters were left on the patient during a single fraction and then measured 24 hours later.

RESULTS

The mean dose delivered with photons to the primary breast for all patients was 4998 cGy [SD = 52], and the mean single fraction dose was 200 cGy [SD = 9]. The mean percent of the prescribed dose to the contralateral breast was 7.74% (SD = 2.35) for patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy, compared with 9.74% [SD = 2.04] for the patients treated with conventional tangential field techniques. This represented a 20% reduction in the mean dose to the contralateral breast with the use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy when compared with the dose received via the three-dimensional technique, a result that was statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Primary breast irradiation with tangential intensity-modulated radiotherapy technique significantly reduces the dose to the contralateral breast when compared with conventional tangential techniques.

Reduction of radiotherapy-induced late complications in early breast cancer: the role of intensity-modulated radiation therapy and partial breast irradiation

Radiotherapy after conservation surgery has been proven to decrease local relapse and death from breast cancer, and is now firmly established in the management of early breast carcinoma. Currently, the challenge is to optimise the therapeutic ratio by minimising treatment-related morbidity, while maintaining or improving local control and survival. The second part of this review examines the role of two approaches: intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and partial breast irradiation, as means of improving the therapeutic ratio. Discussion of IMRT includes both inverse- and forward-planned methods: the breast usually requires minimal modulation to improve dose homogeneity, and therefore lends itself to simpler forward-planned IMRT techniques; whereas inverse-planned IMRT may be useful in selected cases. There are many dosimetry studies reporting the superiority of IMRT over conventional breast radiotherapy, but there is still a paucity of clinical data regarding patient benefit from these techniques. A critical literature review of clinical partial breast radiotherapy studies focuses on the influence of irradiated breast volume, dose and fractionation, and patient selection on normal tissue side-effects and local control. Clinical reports of partial breast irradiation show several encouraging, but some concerning results about local recurrence rates. Therefore, mature results from randomised trials comparing partial breast irradiation with whole-breast radiotherapy are required. Accurate localisation of the tumour bed and application of appropriate clinical target volumes and planning target volumes are discussed in detail, as these concepts are fundamental for partial breast irradiation.

Cardiac Toxicity Following Thoracic Radiation

While the data regarding radiotherapy (RT)-induced cardiovascular disease in lung cancer patients is limited, the cardiotoxic effects of RT have been thoroughly documented in long-term survivors of breast cancer and Hodgkin's disease. Herein we review data illustrating the cardiotoxic effects of thoracic RT in lung and breast cancer patients. Older RT techniques for treating the breast/chest wall and draining lymph nodes resulted in a relatively high dose being delivered to a substantial volume of heart, and convincing evidence exists of excess cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients treated with these techniques. While modern RT techniques have reduced radiation exposure to the heart, they have not eliminated it. In patients treated with modern techniques, there are conflicting data regarding the impact of radiation on late cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Thus, it is prudent to reduce cardiac exposure as much as possible. Techniques to reduce further cardiac exposure (eg, respiratory gating, intensity modulated radiation therapy) are currently under investigation. Further work is needed to quantify the frequency and severity of cardiac injury and develop preventative methods.