Flunitrazepam and triazolam: a comparison of behavioral effects and abuse liability

Dependence liability of lormetazepam: are all benzodiazepines equal? The case of the new i.v. lormetazepam for anesthetic procedures

There are contradictory publications and reports regarding the dependence liability of the 3-hydroxy-benzo-1,4-diazepine derivative lormetazepam, one of the most often prescribed hypnotic benzodiazepines which is now also available as an intravenous (i.v.) product for anesthetists. The author was involved in the preclinical and subsequently in the clinical development and post-marketing surveillance of lormetazepam. Here, he reviews the published and unpublished data about lormetazepam dependence and proposes explanations for contradictory views from other authors. On this basis and in contrast to class labeling from regulatory bodies and WHO, the author comes to the conclusion that use of lormetazepam definitely carries a lower risk of inducing dependence and causing abuse than most other benzodiazepines. This applies as well to Sedalam^®, the new i.v. application form of lormetazepam, which is much better tolerated than propofol. Because of its pharmacokinetic properties and because all its effects can be fully antagonized with the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil, this innovative intravenous application form of lormetazepam provides an excellent method for premedication, symptomatic treatment of excitation and anxiety in the context of surgical or diagnostic procedures including outpatient interventions and for basic sedation during anesthesia.

Comparative abuse liability of GHB and ethanol in humans

Gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB; sodium oxybate) is approved for narcolepsy symptom treatment, and it is also abused. This study compared the participant-rated, observer-rated effects, motor/cognitive, physiological, and reinforcing effects of GHB and ethanol in participants with histories of sedative (including alcohol) abuse. Fourteen participants lived on a residential unit for ∼1 month. Sessions were conducted Monday through Friday. Measures were taken before and repeatedly up to 24 hours after drug administration. Participants were administered GHB (1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 g/70 kg), ethanol (12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 g/70 kg), or placebo in a double-blind, within-subjects design. For safety, GHB and ethanol were administered in an ascending dose sequence, with placebos and both drugs intermixed across sessions. The sequence for each drug was stopped if significant impairment or intolerable effects occurred. Only 9 and 10 participants received the full dose range for GHB and ethanol, respectively. The highest doses of GHB and ethanol showed onset within 30 minutes, with peak effects at 60 minutes. GHB effects dissipated between 4 and 6 hours, whereas ethanol effects dissipated between 6 and 8 hours. Dose-related effects were observed for both drugs on a variety of measures assessing sedative drug effects, abuse liability, performance impairment, and physiological effects. Within-session measures of abuse liability were similar between the two drugs. However, postsession measures of abuse liability, including a direct preference test between the highest tolerated doses of each drug, suggested somewhat greater abuse liability for GHB, most likely as a result of the delayed aversive ethanol effects (e.g., headache).

A rapid UPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of flunitrazepam, 7-aminoflunitrazepam, methadone and EDDP in human, rat and rabbit plasma

A simple, high-throughput, sensitive LC-ESI-MS/MS method is presented for the simultaneous determination of methadone (MET), flunitrazepam (FNZ) and their major metabolites, EDDP (2-ethilidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidone) and 7-aminoflunitrazepam (7-AFNZ), respectively, in human, rat and rabbit plasma. The isolation of the selected compounds involved a liquid-liquid extraction with ethyl acetate at a basic pH. Good chromatographic separation was achieved on a HSS T3 column (1.8 μm particle size), with a 3 min gradient elution using a mixture of acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid (solvent A) and 5mM ammonium acetate (solvent B) as the mobile phase. The tandem mass spectrometric detection was performed in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode with ionization of the analytes in positive mode. The assay was fully validated according to current acceptance criteria for bioanalytical methods validation. It was proved to be linear in the range of 0.5-250 ng/mL, with adequate accuracy and precision over this range. Based on accuracy and CV% values the LOQ and ULOQ values were set at 0.509 ng/mL and 2036 ng/mL for MET, 0.520 ng/mL and 2080 ng/mL for EDDP, 0.524 ng/mL and 2096 ng/mL for FNZ and 0.528 ng/mL and 2114 ng/mL for 7-AFNZ, respectively. The method was tested for potential matrix effects, without observing significant ion suppression. The investigated compounds stability was examined in plasma at room temperature and after three freeze-thaw cycles and in the final extract when maintained at 4 °C in the autosampler. Potential stability issues were observed only for FNZ at room temperature. The method was successfully applied to quantify the selected compounds in human, rat and rabbit plasma samples, after exposure to FNZ or simultaneous exposure to FNZ and MET.

The reinforcing value of alcohol in a drinking to cope paradigm

BACKGROUND

Alcohol use is often regarded as a means of coping with sadness and distress. The present research was conducted to explore the relation between negative mood and the reinforcing value of alcohol, while clarifying the role of coping motives.

METHODS

Participants with a history of recent alcohol use (N=44; 72% female) attended a laboratory session and were randomly assigned to either a negative (n=22) or a neutral (n=22) mood condition. A manipulation check confirmed that participants in the negative mood condition, but not the neutral mood condition, displayed a significant increase in negative affect. The multiple choice procedure (MCP) was used to measure the reinforcing value of alcohol after the mood manipulation.

RESULTS

Regression models employing the MCP crossover point as the dependent variable and mood condition (neutral or negative) and drinking to cope as predictors indicated that a model with an interaction term accounted for the most variance.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the relation between mood and the reinforcing value of alcohol is moderated by drinking to cope, and help clarify the conditions under which drinking to cope may lead to negative outcomes.

Abuse liability of intra-nasal midazolam in inhaled-cocaine abusers

Intra-nasally instilled benzodiazepines have been proposed for acute anxiety episodes. However, routes with faster absorption may increase abuse liability. This study compared abuse liability of intra-nasal midazolam between subjects with a history of intra-nasal drug abuse and non-psychiatric subjects on a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Thirty-one inhaled-cocaine abusers and 34 normal volunteers received either 1 mg intra-nasal midazolam or active placebo. Visual analogue scales assessing desire to repeat the experience (ER) and Experience Liking (EL) assessed abuse liability. Profile analysis for repeated measures showed a significant effect of time over ER (F([5,57])=3.311, p=0.011) and EL (F([5,57])=3.947, p=0.004), diagnostic group (cocaine abusers scoring higher on both - F([5,57])=5.229, p=0.026; F([5,57])=4.946, p=0.030), regardless of the administered substance. It is concluded that the intra-nasal route does not seem to pose risks for non-psychiatric individuals, but it may represent a risk in itself for subjects with a history of drug abuse through this path.

Modulation of human risky decision making by flunitrazepam

RATIONALE

GABA-modulating drugs produce disinhibitory effects that increase the probability of risk-taking behavior. Previous reports suggest that the misuse of the benzodiazepine flunitrazepam is associated with several forms of harmful risky behavior, including theft, violence, and intoxication-related auto accidents.

OBJECTIVES

The present study examined the dose-response relationships between acute flunitrazepam administration and human decision making under conditions of risk. The analyses also examined flunitrazepam-mediated changes in decision-making processes using a computational modeling approach, the expectancy valence model (EVM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using a laboratory measure of risky decision making designed to address acute drug effects, 12 adults were administered placebo, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg/70 kg flunitrazepam in a within-subject, repeated measures counterbalanced design. Flunitrazepam was compounded and doses were administered in an 8-oz liquid solution. Primary data analyses examined subjective effects, response rates, distribution of choices between the risky and nonrisky option, and personality correlates related to peak drug effects. Individual-subject data were submitted to a computational modeling analysis (EVM) that provided parameter estimates corresponding to components of valence; updating expectancies about alternatives (learning/memory); and consistency between choices and expected outcomes (sensitivity to learned outcomes).

RESULTS

Flunitrazepam produced dose-related changes in subjective effects and response rates, and increased selection of the risky response option. High doses significantly changed decision-making processes related to the learning/memory and consistency parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

At sufficiently high doses, flunitrazepam can engender increases in risky decision making. Globally, these changes appear similar to previous effects we have observed after acute administration of alcohol and alprazolam. As suggested by the EVM outcomes, the mechanisms underlying the changes in risky decision making are more similar to alprazolam than alcohol.

Behavioral economic analysis of drug preference using multiple choice procedure data

The multiple choice procedure has been used to evaluate preference for psychoactive drugs, relative to money amounts (price), in human subjects. The present re-analysis shows that MCP data are compatible with behavioral economic analysis of drug choices. Demand curves were constructed from studies with intravenous fentanyl, intramuscular hydromorphone and oral methadone in opioid-dependent individuals; oral d-amphetamine, oral MDMA alone and during fluoxetine treatment, and smoked marijuana alone or following naltrexone pretreatment in recreational drug users. For each participant and dose, the MCP crossover point was converted into unit price (UP) by dividing the money value ($) by the drug dose (mg/70kg). At the crossover value, the dose ceases to function as a reinforcer, so "0" was entered for this and higher UPs to reflect lack of drug choice. At lower UPs, the dose functions as a reinforcer and "1" was entered to reflect drug choice. Data for UP vs. average percent choice were plotted in log-log space to generate demand functions. Rank of order of opioid inelasticity (slope of non-linear regression) was: fentanyl>hydromorphone (continuing heroin users)>methadone>hydromorphone (heroin abstainers). Rank order of psychostimulant inelasticity was d-amphetamine>MDMA>MDMA+fluoxetine. Smoked marijuana was more inelastic with high-dose naltrexone. These findings show this method translates individuals' drug preferences into estimates of population demand, which has the potential to yield insights into pharmacotherapy efficacy, abuse liability assessment, and individual differences in susceptibility to drug abuse.

Relative abuse liability of indiplon and triazolam in humans: a comparison of psychomotor, subjective, and cognitive effects

Indiplon [N-methyl-N-[3-[3-(2-thienylcarbonyl)-pyrazolo[1,5-alpha]pyrimidin-7-yl]phenyl]acetamide; NBI 34060] is a positive allosteric GABA(A) receptor modulator that is under development for the treatment of insomnia. This study compared the abuse potential of indiplon, a compound with preferential affinity for GABA(A) receptors containing an alpha(1) subunit, with triazolam in 21 volunteers with histories of drug abuse. Placebo, triazolam (0.25, 0.5, and 0.75 mg), and indiplon (30, 50, and 80 mg) were studied in counterbalanced order under double-blind conditions at two different residential research facilities. Both drugs impaired psychomotor and cognitive performance and produced similar dose-related increases in participant and observer ratings of drug strength. The onset of action of both drugs was rapid (30 min); however, the duration of action of indiplon (3-4 h) was shorter than that of triazolam (4-6 h). The profiles of subjective effects of triazolam and indiplon were similar; however, a maximum of 52% of participants identified indiplon as a benzodiazepine or barbiturate, compared with 81% of participants after 0.75 mg of triazolam. On participantrated subjective effects relevant to sedation, the slope of the triazolam dose-effect curve was significantly steeper than that of indiplon. Neither the largest doses of indiplon and triazolam nor the slope of the indiplon and triazolam dose-effect curves were significantly different from each other on any of the same-day or next-day measures of positive drug effects or next-day measures of reinforcing effects. Together, these data suggest that although the abuse potential of indiplon is not different from that of triazolam at these doses, psychomotor and cognitive impairment after large doses of indiplon might be less.

Relative abuse liability of GHB in humans: A comparison of psychomotor, subjective, and cognitive effects of supratherapeutic doses of triazolam, pentobarbital, and GHB

Although preclinical studies suggest that GHB has low likelihood for abuse, case reports indicate that GHB is abused. This study evaluated the relative abuse liability of GHB in 14 volunteers with histories of drug abuse. Psychomotor, subjective, and cognitive effects of a broad range of GHB doses (2-18 g/70 kg), up to a dose that produced severe behavioral impairment in each participant, were compared to placebo and two abused sedative/hypnotic drugs, triazolam (0.5 and 1 mg/70 kg) and pentobarbital (200 and 400 mg/70 kg), under double-blind, double-dummy conditions at a residential research facility. In general, GHB produced effects similar to triazolam and pentobarbital, although GHB was not identified as a benzodiazepine or barbiturate by participants that correctly identified triazolam and pentobarbital as such. On most measures of likelihood of abuse (eg ratings of liking, reinforcing effects), effects of pentobarbital were significantly greater than those of triazolam, with GHB being intermediate. GHB produced significantly greater negative subjective effects, including nausea, than the other drugs. Memory impairment after GHB was less than that after triazolam and pentobarbital. Within participants, the dose-effect function for sedation was steeper for GHB than for triazolam and pentobarbital. Also, at higher doses, GHB was associated with greater sedation and more variability across participants in sedation. Taken together, these data suggest that the profile of effects of GHB only partially overlaps with that of triazolam and pentobarbital. Although the likelihood for GHB to be abused is intermediate to triazolam and pentobarbital, the possibility of accidental overdose (ie greater sedation than intended) with GHB appears to be greater.

An abuse liability comparison of flunitrazepam and triazolam in sedative drug abusers

The present double-blind, placebo-controlled study compared the acute effects of oral administration of the benzodiazepine hypnotics flunitrazepam (6 mg/70 kg) and triazolam (1 and 2 mg/70 kg) on measures relevant to abuse liability as well as on psychomotor performance and observer- and participant-rated measures of drug effects in nine sedative drug abusers. Analysis of participant-rated measures collected 24 h after drug administration (next-day; assessing the overall effects of the drug received 24 h earlier) indicated that flunitrazepam, but neither triazolam dose, produced significant increases relative to placebo in next-day ratings of drug liking, the amount of money the drug would be worth on the street, and the amount of money the participant would be willing to pay for the drug on the street. Importantly, these abuse liability differences between flunitrazepam and triazolam were present at a dose of flunitrazepam (6 mg/70 kg) that produced overall drug effects that were comparable to, or significantly less than, those of a high triazolam dose (2 mg/70 kg). Consistent with results of a previous study in our laboratory, these results suggest that flunitrazepam may have a greater abuse liability than triazolam, and that this abuse liability difference emerges on measures taken 24 h after drug administration but not on same-day measures.

Self-injection of flunitrazepam alone and in the context of methadone maintenance in baboons

Patients in methadone maintenance programs use benzodiazepines to "boost" methadone's subjective effects, and flunitrazepam has been prominent in this context. Self-administration of flunitrazepam (0.001-0.32 mg/kg i.v.) alone and during daily oral methadone administration was evaluated in three baboons. Flunitrazepam maintained self-injection as an inverted U-shaped function of dose at rates higher than those maintained by most other benzodiazepines under the same procedure. In the context of demonstrated physical dependence on 3.2 mg/kg/day p.o. methadone, flunitrazepam doses on the ascending limb of the dose-effect curve maintained greater rates of self-injection than before methadone in two baboons. When the methadone dose decreased to 1.8 mg/kg/day, self-injection remained higher for those baboons and became higher than before methadone for the third baboon. Self-injection remained higher when methadone decreased to 1.0 mg/kg/day, except self-injection of the lowest flunitrazepam dose returned to or below the pre-methadone rate for two baboons. After methadone was discontinued, the dose-effect curve shifted to the right in one baboon but remained to the left in two. Flunitrazepam thus served as a reinforcer alone and in the context of methadone maintenance. Lower doses maintained higher self-injection during and shortly after methadone maintenance. Further research should explore the duration of higher self-injection rates following methadone maintenance.

A brief overview of the clinical pharmacology of "club drugs"

Four different "club drugs" are reviewed: MDMA (methylenedioxymethamphetamine, "Ecstasy"), GHB (gamma-hydroxybutyrate), ketamine, and Rohypnol (flunitrazepam). The neurobiology, clinical pharmacology, and treatment issues for each are discussed.

Reinforcing and subjective effects of the volatile anesthetic, sevoflurane

Sevoflurane is a volatile anesthetic that is chemically similar to volatile substances of abuse and can be safely administered to humans in laboratory research. In this study, the reinforcing and subjective effects of five concentrations of sevoflurane (0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8% sevoflurane in O2) were studied in 20 non-drug-abusers. During each of five sessions, subjects sampled a concentration of sevoflurane and 100% O2 (placebo) for 10 min each. Later, within the session, they chose nine times, once every 5 min, among sevoflurane (e.g. "Agent A"), placebo (e.g. "Agent B"), or neither (and were administered 100% O2, identified as "drug-free air"). Although "neither" was selected most frequently, mean preference ratios (sevoflurane choices/[sevoflurane choices+placebo choices]) and total sevoflurane choice peaked at the 0.4% concentration. Choice patterns varied across subjects, with some subjects never choosing sevoflurane and other subjects showing monotonic increasing or bitonic concentration-choice functions. Concentration-related increases in subjective effects were observed, including effects that are putatively associated with abuse liability. Ratings of drug liking and of wanting to inhale the drug again were positively correlated with sevoflurane choice. This study shows that sevoflurane can function as a reinforcer and produce abuse liability-related subjective effects in some healthy volunteers.

Acute toxic effects of club drugs

This article summarizes the short-term physiological toxicity and the adverse behavioral effects of four substances (GHB, ketamine, MDMA, and Rohypnol) that have been used at latenight dance clubs. The two primary data sources were case studies of human fatalities and experimental studies with laboratory animals. A safety ratio was calculated for each substance based on its estimated lethal dose and its customary recreational dose. GHB (gamma-hydroxybutyrate) appears to be the most physiologically toxic; Rohypnol (flunitrazepam) appears to be the least physiologically toxic. The single most risk-producing behavior of club drug users is combining psychoactive substances, usually involving alcohol. Hazardous drug-use sequelae such as accidents, aggressive behavior, and addiction were not factored into the safety ratio estimates.

Principles of initial experimental drug abuse liability assessment in humans

This paper describes the rationale and procedures for conducting what is considered by many to be the current "gold standard" for initial abuse liability testing of a novel compound: the classic acute dose-effect comparison study in volunteers with histories of drug abuse. Such a trial is most appropriate for predicting the likelihood of abuse by drug abusers and, in turn, the extent of drug diversion and illicit street sales if the novel compound became available in the community. The dose-effect abuse liability trial typically involves a double-blind complete crossover design in 10-14 subjects with histories of polydrug abuse in a controlled clinical pharmacology laboratory setting. Drug conditions usually involve placebo, three doses of the novel compound and three doses of an appropriate reference compound of known abuse liability. In each session, the time-course of effects of a single drug dose are evaluated. Intervals between experimental sessions are typically 1 to several days. The importance of testing high supra-therapeutic doses of the novel drug for the validity of the trial is emphasized, and the use of a dose run-up pilot study for selecting maximal doses and matching doses between the novel and comparison compound is explained. The rationale and description of outcome measures is discussed, including measures that reflect likelihood of abuse (e.g. drug vs. money choice and subject ratings of liking, good effects, estimated monetary street value), secondary measures that should be considered in interpreting likelihood of abuse (e.g. drug identification, subject-rated side effects and mood changes), and additional concurrent measures to establish equivalence of the novel and comparison compound (e.g. behavioral performance, observer-rated assessments, physiological measures).

Modulation of rate of onset and intensity of drug effects reduces abuse potential in healthy males

Low, medium, and high doses of flunitrazepam were tested in three independent randomized, double-blind, balanced cross-over, placebo-controlled trials to study the influence of rate of onset of effects and dose administered on its acute effects. Three groups of 12 healthy male volunteers received six oral doses of placebo or flunitrazepam in slow and fast onset conditions as follows: six capsules of 0.16 mg (slow) and a single capsule of 0.8 mg (fast) in the low dose trial; six 0.25 mg (slow) and a single 1.25 mg (fast) capsules for medium dose; and six 0.4 mg (slow) and a single 2 mg (fast) capsule for high dose. At each dose level, slow or fast increasing flunitrazepam plasma concentrations lead to similar peak levels, but induced differential subjective and behavioral effects. In addition to objective and subjective sedation, flunitrazepam induced some pleasurable feelings, which were more intense in the fast than in the slow conditions. At the highest dose, unpleasant sedative effects surmounted positive effects, while at the lowest dose pleasurable effects were of low intensity. At the medium dose, the balance between pleasurable and unpleasant feelings resulted in euphorigenic effects, which were evident in the fast condition but were blunted in the slow condition.

Behavioral effects of flunitrazepam: reinforcing and discriminative stimulus effects in rhesus monkeys and prevention of withdrawal signs in pentobarbital-dependent rats

Flunitrazepam was evaluated in several procedures that have been used extensively to study the behavioral effects and abuse potential of positive GABA(A) modulators. One group of monkeys (n=3) responded to receive injections of methohexital or saline (i.v.) while other groups (n=2-4/group) discriminated vehicle from either pentobarbital or triazolam. Other monkeys (n=2) received diazepam daily and discriminated flumazenil from vehicle. Finally, the ability of flunitrazepam to prevent the emergence of withdrawal signs in pentobarbital-treated rats was evaluated. Flunitrazepam maintained i.v. self-administration that was, on average, less than that maintained by methohexital and greater than that maintained by saline. In drug discrimination studies, flunitrazepam substituted for pentobarbital and for triazolam and failed to substitute for flumazenil. In rats (n=3-6/group), signs of withdrawal were not evident when flunitrazepam treatment replaced pentobarbital treatment; withdrawal signs emerged when either pentobarbital or flunitrazepam treatment was terminated. Taken together with data from previous studies, these data suggest that the abuse liability of flunitrazepam is comparable to that of other benzodiazepines.