Damage Control Surgery for Abdominal Trauma

External Bleeding and Advanced Biomacromolecules for Hemostasis

Hemorrhage is a significant medical problem that has been an active area of research over the past few decades. The human body has a complex response to bleeding that leads to blood clot formation and hemostasis. Many biomaterials based on various biomacromolecules have been developed to either accelerate or improve the body's natural response to bleeding. This review examines the mechanisms of hemostasis, types of bleeding, and the in vitro or in vivo models and techniques used to study bleeding and hemostatic materials. It provides a detailed overview of the diverse hemostatic materials, including those that are highly absorbent, wet adhesives, and those that accelerate the biochemical cascade of blood clotting. These materials are currently marketed, under preclinical testing, or being researched. In exploring the latest advancements in hemostatic technologies, this paper highlights the potential of these materials to significantly improve bleeding control in clinical and emergency situations.

The Safety and Efficacy of Hypertonic Saline in Achieving Primary Fascial Closure Following Damage Control Laparotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Effective fluid management is critical in patients undergoing damage control laparotomy (DCL) for trauma and sepsis. Hypertonic saline (HTS) has been proposed as an alternative to isotonic fluids to enhance primary fascial closure rates and optimize fluid balance. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HTS compared to isotonic fluids in patients undergoing DCL. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases up to the 14th of June 2024, identifying studies that compared HTS to isotonic fluids in adult patients undergoing DCL for trauma or sepsis. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting outcomes such as early primary fascial closure (EPFC) rates, time to fascial closure, fluid requirements, electrolyte imbalances, renal function, and mortality. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers, and pooled analyses were conducted using fixed-effect models where appropriate. Four studies encompassing 375 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 100 patients receiving HTS and 275 receiving isotonic fluids. HTS administration was associated with a significantly higher EPFC rate compared to isotonic fluids (odds ratio (OR): 0.314; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.142-0.696; p=0.004). The mean time to fascial closure was also significantly reduced in the HTS group by approximately eight hours (mean difference (MD): 8.007 hours; 95% CI: 5.558-10.596; p<0.001). Patients receiving HTS required significantly less total fluid over 48 hours (MD: 1.055 liters; 95% CI: 0.713-1.398; p<0.001). While HTS use led to higher peak sodium levels (MD: -4.318 mEq/L; 95% CI: -4.702 to -3.934; p<0.001), there were no significant differences in peak creatinine levels, need for inpatient renal replacement therapy, or 28-day mortality between the groups. HTS appears to be effective in improving EPFC rates and reducing both time to closure and overall fluid requirements in patients undergoing DCL for trauma and sepsis. Although associated with higher serum sodium levels, HTS did not increase the risk of renal dysfunction or mortality. These findings suggest that HTS is a safe and efficacious alternative to isotonic fluids in the management of critically ill patients requiring DCL. Further large-scale, randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these results and inform clinical guidelines.

Treatment outcomes of penetrating abdominal injury requiring laparotomy at Hiwot Fana Specialized University Hospital, Harar, Ethiopia

Background

Penetrating abdominal injury (PAI) is a public health problem and accounts for significant mortality and disability in both developing and developed countries. It often causes damage to internal organs, resulting in shock and infection. In this study, we assessed the outcomes of PAI and factors associated with post-surgical outcomes including surgical site infection (SSI) and in-hospital death.

Methods

An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted from 15 January to January 30, 2020, using a standard checklist to review the clinical charts of patients who presented to Hiwot Fana Specialized University Hospital (HFSUH) with PAI and underwent laparotomy between January 2015 and September 2019. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the characteristics of patients, and odds ratios (ORs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported for factors included in binary logistic regression. The statistical significance was declared at a P-value <0.05.

Results

A total of 352 charts of patients with PAI were reviewed. A majority of them (84.9%) were males and the mean age was 26.5 years. The anterior abdomen was the most common site of injury, accounting for 285 patients (81%), 329 patients (93.5%) suffered organ injury, 204 (62%) had a single organ injury, and 125 (38%) had more than one organ injury. The leading injured organs were small intestines 194 (55.1%), followed by the colon 88 (25%) and liver 40 (11.4%). The magnitude of SSI and hospital death was 84 (23.9%) and 12 (3.4%), respectively. Patients above 45 years of age (AOR = 2.9, 95% CI: 1.2, 9.2), with fluid collection (AOR = 2.7, 95% CI: 1.2, 5.9), colostomy (AOR = 3.9, 95% CI: 1.9, 7.8), body temperature >37.5 °C (AOR = 3.8,95% CI:1.9,7.6), and Hgb < 10 mg/dl (AOR = 7.4, 95% CI: 3.4,16.1) had a higher likelihood of SSI. Those patients admitted to the intensive care unit (AOR = 21.3, 95% CI: 1.1, 412.3) and who underwent damage control surgery (AOR = 9.6, 95% CI: 1.3, 73.3) had a higher likelihood of mortality.

Conclusions

SSI and death among patients with PAI were high. Age, fluid collection, colostomy, body temperature, and hemoglobin level were statistically associated with SSI, and intensive care unit and damage control surgery were statistically associated with death. Therefore, health professionals working in surgical wards should consider these factors to alleviate SSI and prevent death. Broadly speaking, the guidelines of the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) should consider these factors in their recommendations.

Laparotomy Due to War-Related Penetrating Abdominal Trauma in Civilians: Experience From Syria 2011-2017

OBJECTIVES

Penetrating abdominal trauma is one of the injuries that could affect civilians in wartime. This retrospective study investigates the commonly injured abdominal organs, and the impact of multiple injured organs on mortality.

METHODS

We reviewed the operating room (OR) logs of patients who presented to the surgical emergency department (SED) at Al-Mouwasat University Hospital with war-related abdominal penetrating trauma requiring exploratory laparotomy between April 1, 2011 and December 31, 2017.

RESULTS

Of 7826 patients with traumatic injuries, 898 patients (11.5%) required exploratory laparotomy. Of all patients who had an exploratory laparotomy (n = 898), 58 patients (6.5%) died in the perioperative period. Regarding complete laparotomies (n = 873 patients), small intestines, large intestines, and liver were the most commonly affected organs (36.4%, 33%, 22.9%, respectively). A total of 92 patients (10.2%) had negative laparotomy in which all the abdominal organs were not injured. The perioperative mortality rate (POMR) increased when more organs/organ systems were injured per patient reaching a peak at 3 organs/organ systems injuries with a POMR of 8.3%. POMR was highest in patients with musculoskeletal injuries (18.2%), followed by vascular injuries (11.8%), and liver injuries (7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The management of civilians' abdominal injuries remains a challenge for general and trauma surgeons, especially the civilian trauma team. The number and type of injured organs and their correlation with mortality should be considered during surgical management of penetrating abdominal injuries.

Modified Whipple on an 18-month-old with traumatic pancreatic transection and duodenal rupture

The emergence of the Whipple procedure revolutionized operative management of pancreatic disease since its introduction (Fernandez-del Castillo et al., 2012 [1]). This operation classically involves removal of the head of the pancreas along with the duodenum, gallbladder, a portion of the bile duct, and part of the stomach (Warshaw and Thayer, 2004; Evans et al., 2007 [2,3]). We report a beneficial outcome of a modified Whipple on a paediatric trauma patient post- motor vehicle accident (MVA). After Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) was initiated and haemodynamic stability was achieved, exploratory laparotomy revealed pancreatic transection and duodenal rupture. Partial pancreaticoduodenectomy, pancreaticoduodenostomy, cholecystojejunostomy, and pyloric-sparing gastrojejunostomy were performed. Post-operative acute pancreatitis resolved with antibiotics and supportive care.

While paediatric abdominal trauma does not typically warrant a Whipple, patients with severe injury to the pancreas and neighboring organs with major vascular injury may offer no other intra-operative choice (Adams, 2014; Thatte and Vaze, 2014; Debi et al., 2013 [[4], [5], [6]]). Our patient's growth was followed post-operatively. At a 20-year post-operative follow-up, he reported no further hospitalizations or complications such as diabetes, biliary stricture, gallstones, or growth retardation. We review the literature to expose the novelty of using a Whipple to treat paediatric abdominal trauma, and the advantages of a pylorus-preserving Whipple. Indications for damage control surgery and non-operative management were contrasted with those for definitive surgery to reconstruct the biliary tree to further elucidate why the latter option was chosen.

Management of horizontal duodenal perforation: a report of three cases and review of literature

Background

Perforation of the horizontal duodenum is very rare due to the presence in retroperitoneal space. It depicts an unusual clinical picture and is difficult to diagnose, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. The treatment strategies are usually varied and based on small series of cases, literature reviews, and expert opinions.

Case presentation

Here, we presented three cases of horizontal duodenal perforation in three different clinical processes. The first case, a 30-year-old male patient, presented with abdominal pain and hematemesis after experiencing a physical assault on the previous day. Computed tomography (CT) scan showed rupture of the horizontal duodenum. It was repaired by side-to-side duodenojejunostomy. Postoperatively, he had anastomotic leakage, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and pulmonary failure and recovered after a long hospital stay. The second case, an 81-year-old female, had duodenal perforation with endoscopic coagulation of the bleeding diverticulum. Segmental resection of the duodenum and side-to-side duodenojejunostomy were performed. Postoperatively, there was slight anastomotic leakage, but surgical intervention was not needed. The third case, an 89-year-old female, was a patient with obstructive jaundice due to pancreas head carcinoma, who developed perforation of the horizontal duodenum during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). After unsuccessful conservative management, duodenojejunostomy at the perforated site and gastric bypass were performed. The postoperative course was uneventful.

Conclusion

Early suspicion and investigation is necessary for cases of abdominal injuries. CT scan is the investigation of choice. The management options should be based on the clinical condition of the patient, comorbidities, surgical expertise, existing guidelines, and available resources.