High-performance liquid chromatographic method with electrochemical detection for the analysis of O6-methylguanine

Simultaneous determination of O6-methyl-2'-deoxyguanosine, 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine, and 1,N6-etheno-2'-deoxyadenosine in DNA using on-line sample preparation by HPLC column switching coupled to ESI-MS/MS

O(6)-Methyl-2'-deoxyguanosine (O(6)-mdGuo), 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-oxodGuo), and 1,N(6)-etheno-2'-deoxyadenosine (epsilondAdo) are promutagenic DNA lesions originating from both endogenous and exogenous agents and actions (methylation, hydroxylation, lipid peroxidation products). A highly sensitive quantitative method was developed to measure these DNA adducts simultaneously, using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry with column switching. Deuterated O(6)-[(2)H(3)]mdGuo was synthesized and used as internal standard. The limits of quantification for O(6)-mdGuo, 8-oxodGuo, and epsilondAdo were 24, 98, and 48 fmol on column, respectively. The method showed linearity in the range 0.24-125 pmol/ml, 0.98-125 pmol/ml, and 0.49-62.5 pmol/ml for the three adducts, respectively. The inter-day precision in the linear concentration range was between 1.7 and 9.3% for O(6)-mdGuo, 10.6 and 28.7% for 8-oxodGuo, and 6.2 and 10.4%, for epsilondAdo. In DNA isolated from liver of untreated 12-week-old female F344 rats, O(6)-mdGuo was above the limit of detection (37 adducts per 10(9) normal nucleosides) but could not be quantified. 8-oxodGuo and epsilondAdo showed background levels of 500 and 130 adducts per 10(9) normal nucleosides, respectively. DNA analyzed 1h after treatment of rats with dimethylnitrosamine by oral gavage of 50 microg/kg b.wt. did not affect the levels of 8-oxodGuo and epsilondAdo but resulted in 200 O(6)-mdGuo adducts per 10(9) normal nucleosides. The method developed will be of use to study the biological significance of exogenous DNA adducts as an increment to background DNA damage and the role of modulating factors, such as DNA repair.

Monitoring of DNA Adducts in Humans and 32P-Postlabelling Methods. A Review

DNA adduct formation in humans is a promising biomarker for elucidating the molecular epidemiology of cancer. For detection of DNA adducts, the most widely used methods include mass spectroscopy, fluorescence spectroscopy, immunoassays and 32P-postlabelling. Among them, the 32P-postlabelling method appears to meet best the criteria of sensitivity and amount of DNA needed, and, therefore, is one of the most appropriate methods for biomonitoring of human DNA adducts. Most classes of carcinogens have been subjected to 32P-postlabelling analysis, ranging from bulky and/or aromatic compounds to small and/or aliphatic compounds; it has also been used, with modifications, to detect apurinic sites in DNA, oxidative damage to DNA, UV-induced photodimers and, to a lesser extent, DNA damage caused by cytotoxic drugs. It has been used in human biomonitoring studies to detect DNA damage from occupational exposure to carcinogens, and also from environmental (i.e. non-occupational) exposures. It has also led to the discovery of the presence of numerous modifications in DNA arising from endogenous processes. The principle of the method is the enzymatic digestion of DNA to nucleotides, 5'-labelling of these nucleotides with an isotopically labelled phosphate group, and the resolution, detection and quantitation of the labelled products. Since the development of the original procedure in the early 1980s, many methods have been developed to increase the sensitivity by enrichment of modified nucleotides prior to labelling. The review presents the individual 32P-postlabelling techniques (standard procedure, enrichment methods) and a critical evaluation of these assays, besides reviewing the applications of the method to different DNA modifications, and its utilization in human biomonitoring studies. A review with 179 references.