Carbapenem antibiotics inhibit valproic acid transport in Caco-2 cell monolayers

A Clinical Nomogram for Predicting Substandard Serum Valproic Acid Concentrations in Chinese Patients With Epilepsy

Background

It is well-known that substandard serum valproic acid (VPA) concentrations may lead to treatment failure of epilepsy. However, there is still a lack of a quick method to predict whether a patient's serum VPA concentration will reach the standard.

Objective

The aims of this study were to investigate the factors leading to substandard serum VPA concentrations in Chinese patients with epilepsy and develop a related nomogram for risk prediction.

Methods

From January 2019 to March 2022, a total of 1143 serum VPA concentrations were collected from 630 hospitalized Chinese patients with epilepsy who were monitored by the Department of Pharmacy of Lu'an People's Hospital, and complete clinical data were collected from the corresponding patients for retrospective analysis. All monitored serum VPA concentrations were further divided into a training cohort and a validation cohort. For the training cohort, serum VPA concentrations below 50 µg/mL and between 50 and 100 µg/mL were classified into the subtherapeutic group and therapeutic group, respectively. The variables were selected from the clinical data, and differences between the variables of the subtherapeutic and therapeutic groups were analyzed. The influencing factors leading to substandard serum VPA concentrations were screened via logistic regression analysis, and the screened influencing factors were used to establish the nomogram prediction model.

Results

Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the daily dose per unit of body weight (mg/kg/d), route of administration, presence of hepatic lesions, hypoalbuminemia, and combination with carbapenems or barbiturates were independent factors influencing the occurrence of substandard serum VPA concentrations. On the basis of the results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis, a nomogram risk prediction model for substandard serum VPA concentration was established. The values of the C-index and internal verification results indicated that the nomogram model had good accuracy and discrimination. The decision curve revealed that the nomogram that predicted the risk of substandard serum VPA concentration had a greater net benefit value (ranging from 12% to 94%), indicating that the model had a wide prediction interval.

Conclusions

Our study established a nomogram risk prediction model for substandard serum VPA concentrations in Chinese patients with epilepsy, which can help doctors or patients control the serum VPA concentration within the target concentration range as soon as possible.

Combined carbapenem resulted in a 4.48-fold increase in valproic acid clearance: a population pharmacokinetic model in Chinese children and adults with epilepsy or after neurosurgery

Our study aims to explore the pharmacokinetics of valproic acid (VPA) in Chinese patients with epilepsy or after neurosurgery and establish a robust population pharmacokinetics (PPK) model. The PPK model was developed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling, incorporating a total of 615 VPA plasma concentration data points from 443 Chinese epilepsy or after neurosurgery patients. A one-compartment model with an additive residual model was established. Forward addition and backward elimination strategies were used to assess the impact of covariates on the model parameters. Goodness-of-fit plots, bootstrap, visual predict check and normalized prediction distribution errors were used for model validation. In the final model, the apparent clearance (CL) was estimated using the following formula: CL  L / h = 0.430 × BW / 60 0.787 × Cr / 50.3 - 0.253 × ALB / 39 - 0.873 × e gender × e CBP × e IND 2   × e η CL (gender = 0.121 when is female, otherwise = 0; CBP = 1.50 when combined with carbapenems, otherwise = 0; IND2 = 0.15 when combined with oxcarbazepine, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, or phenytoin, otherwise = 0). The volume of distribution (Vd) was estimated using the formula: Vd  L = 8.66 × BW / 60 0.751 . Comedication with carbapenems could increase VPA clearance by 4.48 times, and comedication with oxcarbazepine could enhance VPA clearance by 116%. Besides, creatinine and albumin could affect VPA clearance. Goodness-of-fit plots, bootstrap, visual predict check and normalized prediction distribution showed acceptable data fit, stability, and predictability of the model. In our study, a PPK model was utilized to attain a more comprehensive insight into these variables, improving the accuracy and individualization of VPA therapy in Chinese patients with epilepsy or after neurosurgery.

Clinical impact of carbapenems in critically ill patients with valproic acid therapy: A propensity-matched analysis

Background

Valproic acid (VPA) is one of the most widely used broad-spectrum antiepileptic drugs, and carbapenems (CBPs) remain the drug of choice for severe infection caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria in critically ill patients. The interaction between VPA and CBPs can lead to a rapid depletion of serum VPA level. This may then cause status epilepticus (SE), which is associated with significant mortality. However, the prognostic impact of drug interactions in critically ill patients remains an under-investigated issue.

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the prognosis of critically ill patients treated with VPA and concomitant CBPs or other broad-spectrum antibiotics.

Methods

Adult patients admitted to a medical center intensive care unit between January 2007 and December 2017 who concomitantly received VPA and antibiotics were enrolled. The risk of reduced VPA serum concentration, seizures and SE, mortality rate, length of hospital stay (LOS), and healthcare expenditure after concomitant administration were analyzed after propensity score matching.

Results

A total of 1,277 patients were included in the study, of whom 264 (20.7%) concomitantly received VPA and CBPs. After matching, the patients who received CBPs were associated with lower VPA serum concentration (15.8 vs. 60.8 mg/L; p < 0.0001), a higher risk of seizures (51.2 vs. 32.4%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.19; 95% CI, 1.48–3.24; p < 0.0001), higher risk of SE (13.6 vs. 4.7%; aOR, 3.20; 95% CI, 1.51–6.74; p = 0.0014), higher in-hospital mortality rate (33.8 vs. 24.9%; aOR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.03–2.20; p = 0.036), longer LOS after concomitant therapy (41 vs. 30 days; p < 0.001), and increased healthcare expenditure (US$20,970 vs. US$12,848; p < 0.0001) than those who received other broad-spectrum antibiotics.

Conclusion

The administration of CBPs in epileptic patients under VPA therapy was associated with lower VAP serum concentration, a higher risk of seizures and SE, mortality, longer LOS, and significant utilization of healthcare resources. Healthcare professionals should pay attention to the concomitant use of VPA and CBPs when treating patients with epilepsy. Further studies are warranted to investigate the reason for the poor outcomes and whether avoiding the co-administration of VPA and CBP can improve the outcomes of epileptic patients.

Valproate Interaction With Carbapenems: Review and Recommendations

Introduction: Valproic acid is a commonly used antiepileptic drug. Combining valproate derivatives with carbapenem antibiotics is associated with a potential drug interaction that decreases serum concentration of valproate and may expose the patient to uncontrolled seizure risk from valproate subtherapeutic concentration. Raising awareness of this drug interaction among health care providers including emergency department physicians, neurologists, and pharmacists is highly needed. The aim of this article was to review the current literature about the potential drug interaction resulting from combining valproate derivatives with carbapenem antibiotics and to establish therapeutic recommendations regarding their use together. Methods: A review of the literature was conducted using Medline (through PubMed), Ovid, Embase, Cochrane library using the following keywords: valproate, valproic acid, carbapenem, ertapenem, doripenem, meropenem, imipenem, and valproate drug interaction. In addition, a manual search through major journals for articles referenced in PubMed was performed. Related publications from January 1998 till November 2018 were included in the initial search. Relevant publications were reviewed, and data regarding patients, type of carbapenem used, valproic acid dosing and level, interaction severity, and clinical outcome were summarized. Results and Discussion: Few clinical trials and multiple case reports have shown that carbapenem antibiotics including meropenem, ertapenem, imipenem, and doripenem can decrease the serum concentration of valproate derivatives leading to a subtherapeutic serum concentration and seizures in some patients. Valproic acid serum concentration may be significantly decreased with addition of a carbapenem antibiotic but generally return toward normal shortly after discontinuation of the carbapenem antibiotic. Conclusions: Generally, the concurrent use of carbapenem antibiotics with valproate derivatives should be avoided due to the potential of drug-drug interaction that results in subtherapeutic valproate serum concentration. Other antimicrobial agents should be considered as alternatives to carbapenems but if a concurrent carbapenem is necessary, using an additional antiepileptic agent is recommended. Therapeutic drug monitoring of valproate serum concentrations is warranted when a carbapenem-valproic acid combination therapy is unavoidable.

Interactions of aliskiren, a direct renin inhibitor, with antiepileptic drugs in the test of maximal electroshock in mice

Experimental studies showed that certain angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin AT₁ receptor antagonists can decrease seizure severity in rodents. Additionally, some of these blockers of the renin-angiotensin system have been documented to enhance the anticonvulsant activity of antiepileptic drugs against maximal electroshock-induced seizures. The aim of the current study was to investigate the effect of aliskiren, a direct renin inhibitor and a novel antihypertensive drug, on the protective action of numerous antiepileptic drugs (carbamazepine, valproate, clonazepam, phenobarbital, oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, topiramate and pregabalin) in the test of maximal electroshock in mice. The examined drugs were administered intraperitoneally. Aliskiren up to a dose of 75mg/kg did not affect the threshold for electroconvulsions, however, aliskiren (75mg/kg) enhanced the anticonvulsant action of clonazepam and valproate. Following aliskiren treatment, a higher brain concentration of valproate was noted, suggesting a pharmacokinetic interaction. In the rota-rod test, the concomitant treatment with aliskiren (50 or 75mg/kg) and clonazepam (22.6mg/kg) impaired motor coordination while clonazepam (22.6mg/kg) alone showed strong tendency towards this impairment. The combination of aliskiren (75mg/kg) with phenobarbital (25.5mg/kg) caused long-term memory deficits in the passive avoidance task. This study shows that there are no negative interactions between aliskiren and the examined antiepileptic drugs as concerns their anticonvulsant activity. Aliskiren even potentiated the anticonvulsant action of clonazepam and valproate against maximal electroshock. The impact of aliskiren alone on seizure activity or on the anticonvulsant and adverse activity of antiepileptic drugs needs further evaluation in other animal models of seizures.

Carbapenems and valproate: A consumptive relationship

A clinical case series is presented to characterize the interaction between carbapenem antibiotics and sodium valproate. Six illustrative cases are presented in which carbapenem therapy led to the rapid depletion of serum valproate levels, and one case is presented to demonstrate the difficulty of initiating valproate therapy in patients already on meropenem. The speed of valproate depletion after the initiation of carbapenem therapy, the effect of treatment duration, clinical manifestations, delay in valproate level normalization after carbapenem therapy, the efficacy of supplemental valproate doses, and the usefulness of valproate dose escalation are evaluated. Five out of the 7 patients became acutely symptomatic owing to their subtherapeutic valproate levels. The presented cases also highlight the relatively slow normalization of valproate levels after discontinuation of the antibiotic therapy. Our cases suggest that the interaction is not absorption‐mediated because all of our patients received intravenous valproate. We observed that the introduction of alternative antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may be preferable to valproate dose escalation, which is ineffective in the presence of concomitant meropenem therapy. The characterization and recognition of this interaction have implications for the management of a particularly vulnerable patient cohort.

Novel carbapenem antibiotics for parenteral and oral applications: in vitro and in vivo activities of 2-aryl carbapenems and their pharmacokinetics in laboratory animals

SM-295291 and SM-369926 are new parenteral 2-aryl carbapenems with strong activity against major causative pathogens of community-acquired infections such as methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae (including penicillin-resistant strains), Streptococcus pyogenes, Enterococcus faecalis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Haemophilus influenzae (including β-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant strains), and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (including ciprofloxacin-resistant strains), with MIC(90)s of ≤ 1 μg/ml. Unlike tebipenem (MIC(50), 8 μg/ml), SM-295291 and SM-369926 had no activity against hospital pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MIC(50), ≥ 128 μg/ml). The bactericidal activities of SM-295291 and SM-369926 against penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae and β-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant H. influenzae were equal or superior to that of tebipenem and greater than that of cefditoren. The therapeutic efficacies of intravenous administrations of SM-295291 and SM-369926 against experimentally induced infections in mice caused by penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae and β-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant H. influenzae were equal or superior to that of tebipenem and greater than that of cefditoren, respectively, reflecting their in vitro activities. SM-295291 and SM-369926 showed intravenous pharmacokinetics similar to those of meropenem in terms of half-life in monkeys (0.4 h) and were stable against human dehydropeptidase I. SM-368589 and SM-375769, which are medoxomil esters of SM-295291 and SM-369926, respectively, showed good oral bioavailability in rats, dogs, and monkeys (4.2 to 62.3%). Thus, 2-aryl carbapenems are promising candidates that show an ideal broad spectrum for the treatment of community-acquired infections, including infections caused by penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae and β-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant H. influenzae, have low selective pressure on antipseudomonal carbapenem-resistant nosocomial pathogens, and allow parenteral, oral, and switch therapies.

Clarithromycin is absorbed by an intestinal uptake mechanism that is sensitive to major inhibition by rifampicin: results of a short-term drug interaction study in foals

Pulmonary penetration of clarithromycin (CLR) in epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and bronchoalveolar lavage cells (BALCs) can be influenced by CYP3A4, by P-glycoprotein, and, according to our hypothesis, by a member of the organic anion-transporting protein (OATP) family, for which rifampicin (RIF) is inhibiting in single doses but inducing after long-term coadministration. To assess the partial inhibitory effect, we measured absorption and pulmonary distribution of CLR after short-term (2.5-day) coadministration of RIF, after which up-regulation is not expected. The drug interaction study was performed with five doses (12-h interval) of CLR (7.5 mg/kg) and RIF (10 mg/kg) in nine healthy foals; horse transporters are very similar in protein sequence and transcriptional regulation to the human analogs. RIF was equally distributed in ELF but reached half the plasma levels in BALCs. The deacetylated metabolite accumulated 1.4- to 6-fold in ELF and 8- to 60-fold in BALCs. CLR did not significantly influence the distribution of RIF. CLR and 14-hydroxyclarithromycin (14OH-CLR) accumulated approximately 20- to 40-fold and 1.5- to 4.5-fold in ELF and 300- to 1800-fold and 25- to 90-fold in BALCs, respectively. With RIF, plasma levels of CLR decreased by more than 70% without changes in 14OH-CLR formation, the half-lives of CLR and 14OH-CLR, and the 4β-hydroxycholesterol/cholesterol ratio (a surrogate for CYP3A4 induction). CLR was an inhibitor of OATP1B3 (IC(50) = 9.50 ± 3.50 μM), OATP1B1 (IC(50) = 46.0 ± 2.27 μM), OATP1A2 (IC(50) = 92.6 ± 1.49 μM), and OATP2B1 (IC(50) = 384 ± 5.30 μM) but was not a substrate for these transporters in transfected human embryonic kidney cells. In conclusion, despite having no significant inducing effects, RIF decreased plasma levels of CLR below the minimal inhibitory concentration required to inhibit 90% of growth of pathogenic bacteria, most likely through inhibition of an unknown intestinal uptake transporter.

[Analysis of the valproic acid-meropenem interaction in hospitalised patients]

INTRODUCTION

Published data demonstrate a serious interaction between valproic acid and meropenem. However, recommendations about the management of concomitant treatment are contradictory; some experts recommend closer monitoring of valproic acid serum concentrations and others recommend avoiding concurrent therapy. The purpose of this study is to critically analyse the interaction and to evaluate the impact of pharmaceutical intervention in the use of these drugs in hospitalised patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Study of the concomitant prescription of valproic acid and meropenem in a general hospital of 1,080 beds divided in to two periods; the first period was retrospective and observational and it was followed by a prospective period involving pharmaceutical intervention. The prescription habits between both periods were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 26 patients received concurrent treatment with valproic acid and meropenem (13 per period) and none of them maintained therapeutic serum levels of the antiepileptic drug. Pharmaceutical intervention modified prescription habits, reducing by half the number of days of concomitant treatment, changing the antibiotherapy and/or monitoring serum concentrations more often.

CONCLUSIONS

The interaction between valproic acid and meropenem is serious, especially because of the dramatic decrease in the antiepileptic serum concentrations. The concomitant use of both drugs should be avoided, replacing the antibiotherapy empirically, or according to the resistance profiles of the microorganism and maintaining the same the anti-epileptic treatment.

Characterization of inhibitory effect of carbapenem antibiotics on the deconjugation of valproic acid glucuronide

Serum concentrations of valproic acid (VPA) are markedly decreased by coadministration of carbapenem antibiotics (CBPMs). Although inhibition of deconjugation of VPA-glucuronide (VPA-G) to VPA by CBPMs has been proposed as one of the mechanisms to account for this drug-drug interaction, little information is available on the mode of inhibition. In the present study, we characterized the enzyme involved in the deconjugation of VPA-G by using human and rat liver cytosol. It is suggested that 1) deconjugation activity inhibited by CBPMs may be selective for VPA-G, 2) deconjugation of VPA-G may be mediated by enzyme(s) other than β-glucuronidase, and 3) the irreversible inactivation may be responsible for the inhibition of deconjugation of VPA-G by CBPMs. Finally, the kinetic parameters for inactivation (K'(app) and k(inact)) were determined for four CBPMs of diverse structure from in vitro experiments. Based on the results of simulation analyses with these parameters and the degradation rate constant of the putative VPA-G deconjugation enzyme obtained from experiments using rats, it is probable that the deconjugation enzyme for VPA-G in the liver is rapidly and mostly inactivated by these CBPMs under clinical situations.

Drug interaction between carbapenems and extended-release divalproex sodium in a patient with schizoaffective disorder

BACKGROUND

Clinicians prescribing divalproex sodium (DVX) are well aware of its potential to cause a drug-drug interaction. One specific interaction occurs between the carbapenem antibiotics and DVX resulting in decreased valproic acid (VPA) levels immediately following the initiation of this antibiotic class.

OBJECTIVE/METHOD

We describe a case of a 46 year-old Caucasian male who had an undetectable VPA level following treatment with carbapenems.

RESULTS

On admission the patient's VPA level was 115 μg/ml; however, a routine VPA level on day 19 of his hospitalization returned a value of 16 μg/ml. At this point, he had received a total of 15 days of carbapenem antibiotics for treatment of lower leg cellulitis. His DVX dose was increased to a maximum of 6g daily, twice his home dose, but it did not produce a therapeutic VPA concentration. The patient was lost to follow-up before an outpatient VPA level was drawn.

CONCLUSION

Our case report is the first to document this drug-drug interaction in a patient diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type.

The Effect of Carbapenem Antibiotics on Plasma Concentrations of Valproic Acid

Objective:

To critically evaluate the mechanisms of the interaction between valproic acid and carbapenem antibiotics.

Data Sources:

A PubMed search (January 1971–June 2009) was performed to identify literature on the interaction between valproic acid and carbapenem antibiotics. Additional references were identified through review of bibliographies of identified articles.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

Data on the mechanisms of the interaction between valproic acid and carbapenem antibiotics were extracted from identified references that were published in English.

Data Synthesis:

Valproic acid plasma concentrations fall markedly during concomitant administration with carbapenem antibiotics due to a combination of absorption, distribution, and metabolism mechanisms. Carbapenems appear to inhibit the intestinal transporter of valproic acid, thereby reducing absorption of orally administered valproic acid. In vivo experiments in rats demonstrate a 57% reduction in absorption of orally administered valproic acid in the presence of imipenem. Followup studies in Caco-2 cells suggest that the inhibition probably occurs at the basolateral membrane. In addition, enterohepatic recycling of valproic acid may be diminished due to carbapenem activity against gut flora producing β-glucuronidase. When rabbits and rats were given intravenous valproic acid-glucuronide, the glucuronide metabolite of valproic acid, 50–90% of the conversion back into valproic acid was inhibited in the presence of a carbapenem. An increase in erythrocyte distribution of valproic acid has also been observed in the presence of carbapenems. After intravenous administration of a carbapenem and valproic acid, valproic acid plasma concentrations fell in the presence of a carbapenem, yet whole blood concentrations of valproic acid did not change significantly. Follow-up studies suggest that the mechanism of this distribution shift is that multidrug resistance proteins on adenosine triphosphate–binding cassette transporters on erythrocyte membranes are inhibited by carbapenems. Thus, valproic acid is not effluxed out of the erythrocytes. Finally, carbapenems may enhance glucuronidation of valproic acid by increasing UDP-glucuronic acid levels. In rats, UDP-glucuronic acid levels increased by 1,7-fold in the presence of panipenem, which was proportionate to the increase in valproic acid-glucuronide formation.

Conclusions:

Published data demonstrate a serious and complex interaction between valproic acid and carbapenem antibiotics. Coadministration should be avoided, but if no other antibiotic therapies exist, it is imperative to monitor valproic acid concentrations more frequently. Clinicians should anticipate higher doses of valproic acid to maintain therapeutic serum concentrations during coadministration and subsequent dose reductions upon discontinuation of the carbapenem antibiotic.

Interaction between valproic acid and carbapenem antibiotics

The serum concentration of valproic acid (VPA) in epilepsy patients decreased by the administration of carbapenem antibiotics, such as meropenem, panipenem or imipenem, to a sub-therapeutic level. This review summarized several case reports of this interaction between VPA (1-4 g dose) and carbapenem antibiotics to elucidate the possible mechanisms decreasing VPA concentration by carbapenem antibiotics. Studies to explain the decrease were carried out using rats by the following sites: absorption of VPA in the intestine, glucuronidation in the liver, disposition in blood and renal excretion. In the intestinal absorption site, there are two possible mechanisms: inhibition of the intestinal transporter for VPA absorption by carbapenem antibiotics, and the decrease of beta-glucuronidase supplied from enteric bacteria, which were killed by antibiotics. This is consistent with a view that the decrease of VPA originated from VPA-Glu, relating to entero-hepatic circulation. The second key site is in the liver, because of no decreased in VPA level by carbapenem antibiotics in hepatectomized rats. There are three possible mechanisms in the liver to explain the decreased phenomenon: first, decrease of the UDPGA level by carbapenem antibiotics. UDPGA is a co-factor for UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT)-mediated glucuronidation of VPA. Second, the direct activation of UGT by carbapenem antibiotics. This activation was observed after pre-incubation of human liver microsomes with carbapenem antibiotics. Third, the inhibition of beta-glucuronidase in liver by carbapenem antibiotics and the decreased VPA amount liberated from VPA-Glu. The third site is the distribution of VPA in blood (erythrocytes and plasma). Plasma VPA distributed to erythrocytes by the inhibition of transporters (Mrp4), which efflux VPA from erythrocytes to plasma, by carbapenem antibiotics. The increase of renal excretion of VPA as VPA-Glu depends on the increase of VPA-Glu level by UGT. One or a combination of some factors in these mechanisms might relate to the carbapenem-mediated decrease of the plasma VPA level.

Pharmacokinetic interaction on valproic acid and recurrence of epileptic seizures during chemotherapy in an epileptic patient

AIMS

To report a pharmacokinetic interaction between valproic acid (VPA) and anticancer agents observed in an epileptic patient.

METHODS

A 34-year old male epileptic patient receiving VPA underwent cisplatin-based chemotherapy for the treatment of a testicular tumour. The first chemotherapeutic cycle decreased the serum VPA concentration and caused severe generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Thus, thereafter, the serum VPA concentration was monitored along with the chemotherapy.

RESULTS

In a patient receiving VPA daily, severe seizures were observed 7 weeks after the first chemotherapeutic cycle, at which the serum VPA concentration was found to be reduced by approximately 50% of the initial level (90-100 microg ml(-1)). The following cycles (six cycles over a 7-month period) also caused seizures in association with decreased serum VPA concentrations. In contrast, the serum concentration of phenytoin, which was given daily after the second chemotherapeutic cycle, remained at a therapeutic concentration (10-20 microg ml(-1)). After the completion of chemotherapy, the serum concentration of a tumour marker, hCGbeta, decreased to 1.2 ng ml(-1) from more than 120 ng ml(-1) prior to the chemotherapy in this patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful monitoring of VPA concentrations are necessary during cisplatin-based chemotherapy because anticancer agents can reduce the serum concentration and antiepileptic activity of VPA.

Increased erythrocyte distribution of valproic acid in pharmacokinetic interaction with carbapenem antibiotics in rat and human

Carbapenem antibiotics cause pharmacokinetic interaction with valproic acid (VPA) in clinical pharmacotherapy. Here, we investigated the mechanism of interaction from the viewpoint of erythrocyte distribution of VPA in rats and humans. Imipenem or panipenem was administered intravenously and then VPA intravenously or into the intestinal lumen in rats. Both imipenem and panipenem significantly decreased plasma VPA levels. In contrast, these antibiotics did not affect, or rather increased, VPA levels in whole blood, and increased the erythrocyte distribution of VPA in vivo. In clinical, two patients receiving VPA were given imipenem intravenously, because of intractable infectious diseases. Imipenem lowered plasma VPA levels by approximately 40%-60% of original levels, and increased the erythrocyte distribution of VPA, as observed in rats. In conclusion, the pharmacokinetic interaction between VPA and carbapenem antibiotics, in which plasma VPA levels were markedly reduced, may partly be derived from the increased erythrocyte distribution of VPA.

Acute Seizures Due to a Probable Interaction between Valproic Acid and Meropenem

OBJECTIVE:

To report a probable interaction between meropenem and valproic acid that resulted in the development of epileptic seizures.

CASE SUMMARY:

A 21-year-old woman presented to our emergency department because of a new-onset, generalized tonic—clonic seizure and was admitted to the intensive care unit. Treatment with valproic acid 1000 mg as a continuous intravenous infusion over 24 hours was initiated. On day 6, the serum concentration of valproic acid was 52.5 μg/mL. On day 13, treatment with intravenous meropenem 1 g 3 times daily was started. On day 15, when the patient was afebrile, numerous myoclonic episodes occurred involving her arms and face; the serum concentration of valproic acid at that time was 42 μg/mL. The valproic acid dose was increased to 2880 mg. Two days later, a generalized tonic—clonic seizure occurred despite the increased dosage, and the plasma concentration of valproic acid fell to 7 μg/mL. The valproic acid dose was increased the following day to 3600 mg; however, the serum concentrations remained <10 μg/mL. On day 19, based on the results of a blood culture and the suspicion of an interaction between meropenem and valproic acid, meropenem therapy was suspended. The serum concentration of valproic acid was 52.4 μg/mL on day 27. Three days later, the patient was asymptomatic and was discharged.

DISCUSSION:

Coadministration of valproic acid and other drugs that are metabolized by the hepatic cytochrome P450 isoenzyme system can lead to clinically relevant interactions by induction or inhibition of enzymes in shared metabolic pathways. In view of studies in experimental models, the interaction between carbapenem antibiotics and valproic acid is at least possible. Use of the Naranjo probability scale indicated a probable relationship between acute seizures and a meropenem—valproic acid interaction in this patient.

CONCLUSIONS:

This case report provides strong evidence for an interaction between valproic acid and meropenem. Clinicians should be aware of this potential interaction that may be associated with a serious adverse effect as the result of the decrease of the valproic acid serum concentrations.

Epilepsy and comorbidity: infections and antimicrobials usage in relation to epilepsy management

Infections are probably the most common preventable cause of epilepsy worldwide. There are concerns that endemic infections and infestations, such as malaria and neurocysticercosis, could be responsible for the increased incidence of epilepsy in the developing world. Cases of epilepsy associated with neurocysticercosis are also being seen increasingly in developed countries due to migration from, and travel to, endemic areas. When prescribing antimicrobial agents in patients with epilepsy a number of issues need to be considered, such as potential adverse effects on seizure control and interactions with concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Some antimicrobial agents, including penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, quinolones and antimalarials, can have proconvulsant activity and may precipitate seizures, even in patients who do not have epilepsy. Moreover, many antimicrobials increase or decrease the plasma levels of AEDs, whereas some AEDs may adversely affect the efficacy of antimicrobials.

Clinically important drug interactions in epilepsy: interactions between antiepileptic drugs and other drugs

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are commonly prescribed for long periods, up to a lifetime, and many patients will require treatment with other agents for the management of concomitant or intercurrent conditions. When two or more drugs are prescribed together, clinically important interactions can occur. Among old-generation AEDs, carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, and primidone are potent inducers of hepatic enzymes, and decrease the plasma concentration of many psychotropic, immunosuppressant, antineoplastic, antimicrobial, and cardiovascular drugs, as well as oral contraceptive steroids. Most new generation AEDs do not have clinically important enzyme inducing effects. Other drugs can affect the pharmacokinetics of AEDs; examples include the stimulation of lamotrigine metabolism by oral contraceptive steroids and the inhibition of carbamazepine metabolism by certain macrolide antibiotics, antifungals, verapamil, diltiazem, and isoniazid. Careful monitoring of clinical response is recommended whenever a drug is added or removed from a patient's AED regimen.

Panipenem/betamipron

Panipenem is a parenteral carbapenem antibacterial agent with a broad spectrum of in vitro activity covering a wide range of Gram-negative and Gram-positive aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, including Streptococcus pneumoniae and species producing beta-lactamases. Panipenem is coadministered with betamipron to inhibit panipenem uptake into the renal tubule and prevent nephrotoxicity. In large, randomised clinical trials, panipenem/betamipron demonstrated good clinical and bacteriological efficacy (similar to that of imipenem/cilastatin) in adults with respiratory tract or urinary tract infections. Panipenem/betamipron was also effective in adults with surgical or gynaecological infections, and in paediatric patients with respiratory tract and urinary tract infections in noncomparative trials. In small trials in elderly patients reported as abstracts, panipenem/betamipron demonstrated clinical efficacy similar to intravenous piperacillin and greater than oral ofloxacin in urinary tract infections. Elderly patients with respiratory tract infections also responded to therapy. Panipenem/betamipron is well tolerated with few adverse events reported in clinical trials, most commonly elevated serum levels of hepatic transaminases and eosinophils, rash and diarrhoea.